Imprintingstörungen in der Reproduktionsmedizin

Stochastic, environmentally and/or genetically induced errors (epimutations) during genome reprogramming in germ cells and shortly after fertilization are an important source of phenotypic variation and disease susceptibility. Animal experiments provide convincing evidence that assisted reproductive technologies (ART) interfere with sensitive time windows for epigenetic reprogramming. Epidemiological studies in humans suggest an increased risk for Beckwith-Wiedemann and Angelman syndrome; however, the absolute risk of receiving an ART child with imprinting disorder remains small. At least some genes display statistically significant methylation differences within the normal range of methylation variation between ART and non-ART pregnancies. Thus, either ART themselves or factors associated with parental infertility affect the epigenome of the next generation. Faulty methylation patterns in imprinted genes show a significant association with abnormal semen parameters. This supports the idea that epimutations can be transferred from the germline into the embryo.     

The effects of superovulation and reproductive aging on the epigenome of the oocyte and embryo

A societal preference of delaying maternal age at first childbirth has increased reliance on assisted reproductive technologies/therapies (ART) to conceive a child. Oocytes that have undergone physiologic aging (≥35 years for humans) are now commonly used for ART, yet evidence is building that suboptimal reproductive environments associated with aging negatively affect oocyte competence and embryo development—although the mechanisms underlying these relationship are not yet well understood. Epigenetic programming of the oocyte occurs during its growth within a follicle, so the ovarian stimulation protocols that administer exogenous hormones, as part of the first step for all ART procedures, may prevent the gamete from establishing an appropriate epigenetic state. Therefore, understanding how oocyte. Therefore, understanding how hormone stimulation and oocyte physiologic age independently and synergistically physiologic age independently and synergistically affect the epigenetic programming of these gametes, and how this may affect their developmental competence, are crucial to improved ART outcomes. Here, we review studies that measured the developmental outcomes affected by superovulation and aging, focusing on how the epigenome (i.e., global and imprinted DNA methylation, histone modifications, and epigenetic modifiers) of gametes and embryos acquired from females undergoing physiologic aging and exogenous ovarian stimulation is affected.     

Implications of epigenetics and genomic imprinting in assisted reproductive technologies

There have been several reports of an increased risk of genomic imprinting disorders associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, the connection between imprinting defects and ART is tenuous. In this review, this putative association is investigated in detail, with emphasis on particular steps of the ART process, and which of these may be prone to induction of imprinting errors due to synchrony with major imprinting events during gametogenesis, fertilization, and early embryonic development. While contributions from in vitro manipulation of gametes and embryos cannot be ruled out, it appears that superovulation and/or the condition of infertility, itself, may be largely responsible for the increased risk of genomic imprinting disorders observed with ART births. However, two significant shortcomings of all of these studies preclude rigorous exploration of this issue: the lack of large, longitudinal studies on specific cohorts of ART‐conceived children, and questions surrounding the primary generation of expression and epigenetic data from oocytes and embryos. Future directions for study are proposed, along with a preview of what may be in store as the art of ART advances. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76: 1006–1018, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19

Recent data in humans and animals suggest that assisted reproductive technology (ART) might affect the epigenetics of early embryogenesis and might cause birth defects. We report the first evidence, to our knowledge, that ART is associated with a human overgrowth syndrome-namely, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS). In a prospective study, the prevalence of ART was 4.6% (3 of 65), versus the background rate of 0.8% in the United States. A total of seven children with BWS were born after ART-five of whom were conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Molecular studies of six of the children indicate that five of the six have specific epigenetic alterations associated with BWS-four at LIT1 and one at both LIT1 and H19. We discuss the implications of our finding that ART is associated with human overgrowth, similar to the large offspring syndrome reported in ruminants.     

精子表观遗传修饰及其在胚胎发育过程中的潜在作用

精子发生(Spermatogenesis) 是一高度复杂的过程, 包括有丝分裂、减数分裂和精子形成。精母细胞经过独特而广泛的染色质与表观遗传修饰重塑之后, 最终分化产生了具有特定表观遗传修饰的精子。最近研究表明, 成熟精子中的表观遗传修饰在发育的胚胎中发挥了重要作用, 其表观遗传模式的改变会导致某些疾病风险提高, 如受精失败、胚胎发生机能障碍、早产、出生体重低、先天畸形、新生儿死亡以及其他在辅助生殖技术后代中发现的发生频率较高的妊娠相关并发症。文章通过评价成熟精子中DNA甲基化、保留组蛋白修饰、RNAs和精蛋白等表观遗传修饰的重要意义及其在胚胎发育过程中的潜在作用, 阐述了成熟精子中改变的表观遗传修饰与相关疾病之间的关系, 为不育症的防治、精子表观遗传质量评价以及降低辅助生殖技术后代表观遗传疾病风险等提供基础资料。     

Epigenetic deregulation of genomic imprinting in human disorders and following assisted reproduction

Imprinted genes play important roles in the regulation of growth and development, and several have been shown to influence behavior. Their allele-specific expression depends on inheritance from either the mother or the father, and is regulated by "imprinting control regions" (ICRs). ICRs are controlled by DNA methylation, which is present on one of the two parental alleles only. These allelic methylation marks are established in either the female or the male germline, following the erasure of preexisting DNA methylation in the primordial germ cells. After fertilization, the allelic DNA methylation at ICRs is maintained in all somatic cells of the developing embryo. This epigenetic "life cycle" of imprinting (germline erasure, germline establishment, and somatic maintenance) can be disrupted in several human diseases, including Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), Angelman syndrome and Hydatidiform mole. In the neurodevelopmental Rett syndrome, the way the ICR mediates imprinted expression is perturbed. Recent studies indicate that assisted reproduction technologies (ART) can sometimes affect the epigenetic cycle of imprinting as well, and that this gives rise to imprinting disease syndromes. This finding warrants careful monitoring of the epigenetic effects, and absolute risks, of currently used and novel reproduction technologies.     

Large offspring syndrome

Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a human loss-of-imprinting syndrome primarily characterized by macrosomia, macroglossia, and abdominal wall defects. BWS has been associated with misregulation of two clusters of imprinted genes. Children conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) appear to have an increased incidence of BWS. As in humans, ART can also induce a similar overgrowth syndrome in ruminants which is referred to as large offspring syndrome (LOS). The main goal of our study is to determine if LOS shows similar loss-of-imprinting at loci known to be misregulated in BWS. To test this, Bos taurus indicus × Bos taurus taurus F1 hybrids were generated by artificial insemination (AI; control) or by ART. Seven of the 27 conceptuses in the ART group were in the > 97th percentile body weight when compared with controls. Further, other characteristics reported in BWS were observed in the ART group, such as large tongue, umbilical hernia, and ear malformations. KCNQ1OT1 (the most-often misregulated imprinted gene in BWS) was biallelically-expressed in various organs in two out of seven overgrown conceptuses from the ART group, but shows monoallelic expression in all tissues of the AI conceptuses. Furthermore, biallelic expression of KCNQ1OT1 is associated with loss of methylation at the KvDMR1 on the maternal allele and with downregulation of the maternally-expressed gene CDKN1C. In conclusion, our results show phenotypic and epigenetic similarities between LOS and BWS, and we propose the use of LOS as an animal model to investigate the etiology of BWS.     

Reversal of cocaine-conditioned place preference through methyl supplementation in mice: altering global DNA methylation in the prefrontal cortex

Analysis of global methylation in cells has revealed correlations between overall DNA methylation status and some biological states. Recent studies suggest that epigenetic regulation through DNA methylation could be responsible for neuroadaptations induced by addictive drugs. However, there is no investigation to determine global DNA methylation status following repeated exposure to addictive drugs. Using mice conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure, we measured global DNA methylation level in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) associated with drug rewarding effects. We found that cocaine-, but not morphine- or food-CPP training decreased global DNA methylation in the PFC. Chronic treatment with methionine, a methyl donor, for 25 consecutive days prior to and during CPP training inhibited the establishment of cocaine, but not morphine or food CPP. We also found that both mRNA and protein level of DNMT (DNA methytransferase) 3b in the PFC were downregulated following the establishment of cocaine CPP, and the downregulation could be reversed by repeated administration of methionine. Our study indicates a crucial role of global PFC DNA hypomethylation in the rewarding effects of cocaine. Reversal of global DNA hypomethylation could significantly attenuate the rewarding effects induced by cocaine. Our results suggest that methionine may have become a potential therapeutic target to treat cocaine addiction.     

Epigenetic disorders and altered gene expression after use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in domestic cattle

The use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) in modern cattle breeding is an important tool for improving the production of dairy and beef cattle. A frequently employed ART in the cattle industry is in vitro production of embryos. However, bovine in vitro produced embryos differ greatly from their in vivo produced counterparts in many facets, including developmental competence. The lower developmental capacity of these embryos could be due to the stress to which the gametes and/or embryos are exposed during in vitro embryo production, specifically ovarian hormonal stimulation, follicular aspiration, oocyte in vitro maturation in hormone supplemented medium, sperm handling, gamete cryopreservation, and culture of embryos. The negative effects of some ARTs on embryo development could, at least partially, be explained by disruption of the physiological epigenetic profile of the gametes and/or embryos. Here, we review the current literature with regard to the putative link between ARTs used in bovine reproduction and epigenetic disorders and changes in the expression profile of embryonic genes. Information on the relationship between reproductive biotechnologies and epigenetic disorders and aberrant gene expression in bovine embryos is limited and novel approaches are needed to explore ways in which ARTs can be improved to avoid epigenetic disorders.     

Epigenetic disorders and altered gene expression after use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in domestic cattle

The use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) in modern cattle breeding is an important tool for improving the production of dairy and beef cattle. A frequently employed ART in the cattle industry is in vitro production of embryos. However, bovine in vitro produced embryos differ greatly from their in vivo produced counterparts in many facets, including developmental competence. The lower developmental capacity of these embryos could be due to the stress to which the gametes and/or embryos are exposed during in vitro embryo production, specifically ovarian hormonal stimulation, follicular aspiration, oocyte in vitro maturation in hormone supplemented medium, sperm handling, gamete cryopreservation, and culture of embryos. The negative effects of some ARTs on embryo development could, at least partially, be explained by disruption of the physiological epigenetic profile of the gametes and/or embryos. Here, we review the current literature with regard to the putative link between ARTs used in bovine reproduction and epigenetic disorders and changes in the expression profile of embryonic genes. Information on the relationship between reproductive biotechnologies and epigenetic disorders and aberrant gene expression in bovine embryos is limited and novel approaches are needed to explore ways in which ARTs can be improved to avoid epigenetic disorders.     

DNA甲基化在精子发生中的作用

精子发生(spermatogenesis)是一个高度特化的细胞复杂分化过程,其中DNA二核苷酸CpG甲基化变化与基因转录激活、染色质改构以及遗传印记相关,并且该甲基化与基因表达之间的关系是非直接的,其可通过染色质结构的改变或DNA与蛋白质的相互作用来介导。本文着重介绍精子发生过程中DNA甲基化及其跨代遗传风险、DNA甲基转移酶的调控机制以及DNA甲基化与男性不育之间的关系等,为不育症的防治、精子表观遗传质量评价以及降低辅助生殖技术后代表观遗传疾病风险等提供基础资料。     

Stability of genomic imprinting in embryonic stem cells: lessons from assisted reproductive technology

Imprinted genes are expressed predominantly or exclusively from one allele only. This mode of gene expression makes the regulation of imprinted genes susceptible to epigenetic insults, which may in turn lead to disease. There is compelling experimental evidence that certain aspects of assisted reproductive technology (ART) such as in vitro cell culture may have adverse effects on the regulation of epigenetic information in mammalian embryos, including the disruption of imprinted genes and epigenetic regulators. Moreover, in humans, disorders of genomic imprinting have been reported in children conceived by ART. The derivation and in vitro culture of embryonic stem (ES) cells are potential points of origin for epigenetic abnormalities. There is evidence that defects of genomic imprinting occur in mouse embryonic stem cells, with similar data now emerging in related studies in non-human primate and human ES cells. It is therefore pertinent to rigorously assess the epigenetic status of all stem cells and their derivatives prior to their therapeutic use in humans. Focusing on the stability of genomic imprinting, this review discusses the current evidence for epigenetic disruption in mammalian embryonic stem cells in light of the epigenetic disruption observed in ART-derived mammalian embryos.     

Progenitor Cells for Regenerative Medicine and Consequences of ART and Cloning-Associated Epimutations

The “holy grail” of regenerative medicine is the identification of an undifferentiated progenitor cell that is pluripotent, patient specific, and ethically unambiguous. Such a progenitor cell must also be able to differentiate into functional, transplantable tissue, while avoiding the risks of immune rejection. With reports detailing aberrant genomic imprinting associated with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and reproductive cloning, the idea that human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) derived from surplus in vitro fertilized embryos or nuclear transfer ESCs (ntESCs) harvested from cloned embryos may harbor dangerous epigenetic errors has gained attention. Various progenitor cell sources have been proposed for human therapy, from hESCs to ntESCs, and from adult stem cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS and piPS cells). This review highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each of these technologies, with particular emphasis on epigenetic stability.     

HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation

Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that ART will reduce HIV incidence at the population level. Observational investigations using ecological measures have been used to support the implementation of HIV treatment for the specific purpose of preventing transmission at the population level. Many of these studies note ecological associations between measures of increased ART uptake and decreased HIV transmission. Given the urgency of implementing HIV prevention measures, ecological studies must de facto be used to inform current strategies. However, the hypothesis that widespread ART can eliminate HIV infection may have raised expectations beyond what we may be able to achieve. Here we review and discuss the construct of the exposure and outcome measures and analysis methods used in ecological studies. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of ecological analyses, we aim to aid understanding of the findings from these studies to inform future policy decisions regarding the use of ART for HIV prevention.     

The health risks of ART

Assisted reproductive technologies enable subfertile couples to have children. But there are health risks attached for both mothers and children that need to be properly understood and managed.Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has become a standard intervention for couples with infertility problems, especially as ART is highly successful and overall carries low risks [1,2]. The number of infants born following ART has increased steadily worldwide, with more than 5,000,000 so far [3]. In industrialized countries, 1–4% of newborns have been conceived by using ART [4,5], probably owing to the fact that couples frequently delay childbearing until their late 30s, when fertility decreases in both men and women [2]. Considering the possibility that male fertility might be declining, as Richard Sharpe has discussed in this series [6], it is likely that ART will be even more widely used in the future. Yet, as the rate of ART and the total number of pregnancies has increased, it has become apparent that ART is associated with potential risks to the mother and fetus. The most commonly cited health problems pertain to multiple gestation pregnancies and multiple births. More recently, however, concerns about the risks of birth defects and genetic disorders have been raised. There are questions about whether the required manipulations and the artificial environments of gametes and embryos are potentially creating short- and long-term health risks in mothers and children by interfering with epigenetic reprogramming.Notwithstanding, ART represents a tremendous achievement in human reproductive medicine. The birth of Louise Brown, the first ‘test tube baby'' in 1978, was the result of the collaborative work of embryologist Robert Edwards and gynaecologist Patrick Steptoe [7]. This success was a culmination of many years of work at universities and clinics worldwide. An initial lack of support, as well as criticism from ethicists and the church, delayed the opening of the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic in Bourn Hall near Cambridge until 1980. By 1986, 1,000 children conceived by IVF at Bourn Hall had been born [8]. In 2010, Edwards received the Nobel Prize in Medicine for the development of IVF. Regrettably, Steptoe had passed away in 1988 and could not share the honour.…as the rate of ART and the total number of pregnancies has increased, it has become apparent that ART is associated with potential risks to mother and fetusOver the next decades, many improvements in IVF procedures were made to reduce the risks of adverse effects and increase success rates, including controlled ovarian stimulation, timed ovulation induction, ultrasound-guided egg retrieval, cryopreservation of embryos and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)—a technique in which a single sperm cell is injected into an oocyte using a microneedle. In addition, there were further improvements such as assisted hatching and in media composition, such as sequential media, which allow the in vitro culture of the embryo to reach the blastocyst stage [8].Current IVF procedures involve multiple steps including ovarian stimulation and monitoring, oocyte retrieval from the ovary, fertilization in vitro and embryo transfer to the womb. Whereas the first IVF cycles, including the conception of Louise Brown, used natural ovulatory cycles, which result in the retrieval of one or two oocytes, most IVF cycles performed today rely on controlled ovarian stimulation using injectable gonadotropins—follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone—in supraphysiological concentrations for 10–14 days, followed by injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 38–40 h before egg retrieval to trigger ovulation. This updated protocol makes it possible to grow multiple follicles and to retrieve 10–20 oocytes in one IVF cycle, thereby increasing the number of eggs available for fertilization.Post-retrieval, the embryologist places an egg and sperm together in a test tube for fertilization. Alternatively, a single sperm cell can be injected into an egg by using ICSI. This procedure was initially developed for couples with poor sperm quality [9], but has become the predominant fertilization technique used in many IVF clinics worldwide [8]. The developing embryos are monitored by microscopy, and viable embryos are transferred into the woman''s womb for implantation. Louise Brown, as with many embryos today, was transferred three days after egg retrieval, at approximately the eight-cell stage. However, using sequential media, many clinics advocate culturing embryos until day five when they reach the blastocyst stage. The prolonged culture period allows self-selection of the most viable embryos for transfer and increases the chance of a viable pregnancy. Excess embryos can be cryopreserved and transferred at a later date by using a procedure known as frozen embryo transfer (FET). In this article we use the term ART to refer to IVF procedures with or without ICSI and FET.

Science & Society Series on Sex and Science

Sex is the greatest invention of all time: not only has sexual reproduction facilitated the evolution of higher life forms, it has had a profound influence on human history, culture and society. This series explores our attempts to understand the influence of sex in the natural world, and the biological, medical and cultural aspects of sexual reproduction, gender and sexual pleasure.Embryos can also be screened for chromosomal aneuploidies—missing or extra chromosomes—by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) when indicated and when available. PGD can also be used to test fertile couples at increased risk of genetic disorders. To perform PGD, a single cell is obtained from three-day-old embryos for molecular testing, for example sequencing for inherited monogenic disorders or fluorescent in situ hybridization for chromosomal abnormalities [8]. Only embryos with a normal chromosomal constitution, and without the genetic disorder in question, would then be transferred into the woman''s womb.Despite tremendous progress during the past three decades, people undertaking ART still face a considerable risk of failure to achieve parenthood. The rate of clinical pregnancies in Bourn Hall between 1980 and 1985 was 24% and 14% in women younger and older than 40 years, respectively [10]. The reported rates for clinical pregnancies and live births vary by country; the average delivery rate is 22.4%, 23.3% and 17.1% for IVF, ICSI and FET cycles, respectively [11]. According to the last Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report in 2009, the average live-birth rate was 35% per fresh ART cycle, although it sharply declines with age, from 45% among women younger than 35 years to 7% among women older than 42 years [5]. The reasons include poor response to ovarian stimulation, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and failure of eggs to fertilize. However, these failures occur in only a minority of patients and the success rate of egg retrieval and fertilization leading to embryo transfer is a remarkable 90% [12].Implantation remains the least understood process and is a key rate-limiting step in ART. Poor embryo quality is considered to be the main cause of implantation failure and it reflects a high incidence of chromosomal aneuploidies, which increases with maternal age [13]. One obvious solution to improve implantation rates is to transfer more embryos. However, this also increases the risk of multiple births, and related morbidity and mortality in newborns. An alternative approach is to select for good-quality embryos by culturing them to the blastocyst stage, because it seems that aneuploid embryos arrest by this stage and that blactocysts are more likely to have a normal chromosomal complement. There is ongoing research aimed at identifying viable embryos through PGD and metabolic profiling [13].Despite tremendous progress during the past three decades, people undertaking ART still face a considerable risk of failure to achieve parenthoodIt has also been suggested that failure to implant could be caused by the inability of the embryo to hatch out of a glycoprotein layer surrounding the embryo, known as the ‘zona pellucida''; this layer hardens if the embryo is cultured or frozen. Assisted hatching by rupturing the zona pellucida before embryo transfer does increase clinical pregnancy rates, especially for thawed embryos [13]. Another factor linked to the failure of implantation is endometrial receptivity. The endometrium consists of multi-layered mucosa cells in the inner wall of the uterus, which undergoes coordinated remodelling during the menstrual cycle and there is a specific time window when it is receptive to embryo implantation. Several research studies have identified molecular biomarkers of poor endometrial receptivity, showing that prostaglandins, cell adhesion molecules, mucins and cytokines are important [13].When it comes to health risks for mothers and infants, the use of ART increases the risk of multiple births, including higher rates of caesarian sections, prematurity, low birth weight, infant death and disability. More recently, concerns regarding elevated risks of birth defects, genetic abnormalities, neurodevelopmental disorders and imprinting disorders have been reported; however, not all are substantiated. There are still many unanswered questions regarding the potential short- and long-term health risks of ART for women and children, and there are tremendous challenges in studying the safety of ART procedures. Apart from the subset of individuals undergoing ART for social reasons—single parents or same sex couples—most patients are subfertile couples. Subfertility, defined as a failure to conceive naturally after 12 months of unprotected intercourse, affects 8–20% of couples [2], and it can occur for a variety of unknown or known reasons including maternal factors—endocrine, hormonal, endometriosis and blocked fallopian tubes—and paternal factors such as spermatogenesis abnormalities.Most studies have assessed the risks of ART by comparing the outcomes of ART-conceived pregnancies to naturally conceived pregnancies. There is emerging evidence that underlying maternal or paternal subfertility might be an important factor in obstetric, neonatal and childhood outcomes in the ART population. Therefore, to determine the specific health risks associated with the ART process itself, the outcomes of ART-conceived pregnancies should be assessed in comparison with naturally conceived pregnancies in subfertile parents, which is methodologically difficult. Alternatively, studying the health risks of ART in fertile couples—for instance, same-sex couples and couples at risk of genetic disorders—would be informative, but the number of such couples is relatively small.Women who undergo ART are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). OHSS is a complication of ovulation induction resulting in enlargement of ovaries and retention of fluids leading to various secondary complications, which normally resolve within two weeks, but can persist if pregnancy occurs. Patients with OHSS can be offered embryo cryopreservation and frozen embryo transfer when symptoms resolve. Moderate forms of OHSS occur in 5% of patients undergoing ART; 2% of patients require hospitalization. Death occurs with an incidence of approximately 3 per 100,000 ART cycles [14]. OHSS is predominantly caused by human chorionic gonadotropin injection used for inducing final oocyte maturation and ovulation. Research is focused on optimizing alternative stimulation protocols [14].The use of supraphysiological concentrations of hormones during ovarian stimulation has also raised concerns that ART can increase cancer risks linked to hormonal fluctuations. These include breast, ovarian, endometrial, cervical and colon cancers, as well as melanoma. Studies evaluating the risks of cervical cancers, colon cancers and melanoma have not demonstrated increased risks for women undergoing ART [1]. The data for breast, ovarian and endometrial cancer is more complex, however, and more research is required to conclusively determine whether there is an increased risk.The perinatal and obstetric risks of ART are most significantly influenced by multiple pregnancies. These are at a more than 60% risk of low birth weight or premature delivery [2], and related risks of pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes, abnormal placentation and hypertensive disorders [1]. Multiple pregnancies occur in 1% of naturally conceived pregnancies and 25–50% of ART pregnancies, owing to multiple embryo transfer. In the Western world, about 30–50% of all twin pregnancies result from ART [2]. Whilst double or triple embryo transfer is still common, the development of cryopreservation techniques and extended blastocyst culture has increased the use of single embryo transfer (SET), especially for younger women. Many European countries and the province of Quebec, in Canada, where ART is publicly funded, have adopted a policy of SET, which has dramatically decreased the incidence of multiple pregnancies. In Belgium and Quebec, SET policies have reduced multiple pregnancies from 19% to 3% and from 27% to 6%, respectively. It has been argued that SET results in a lower live-birth rate than a double-embryo transfer, but this is almost completely overcome by an additional single frozen embryo cycle [2].…there are tremendous challenges in studying the safety of ART proceduresThe question of whether ART increases the risks of pregnancy complications, including prematurity and low birth weight in singletons, remains unresolved; several studies have found an increased risk, but others have not replicated these findings [1,2]. It has been suggested that the fertility history of patients undergoing ART is an important factor, as there is an association between the length of time to conception and prematurity and birth weight [15]. Prematurity and low birth weight are also known to be associated with long-term health effects, including adult onset coronary artery disease, hypertension, obesity and type 2 diabetes [16,17].Various studies have also reported a higher incidence of congenital anomalies in ART-conceived children, with a suggested 30% increase of malformations [2]. However, this is another risk that might be attributable to parental subfertility, as a study comparing children conceived by ART to subfertile parents and children conceived naturally to subfertile parents did not find any significant difference in the congenital anomaly rate [2]. Findings from another study of the risks of birth defects in children conceived naturally to women with and without a history of subfertility compared with children conceived with the assistance of ART also suggest that it is subfertility, rather than ART, that is associated with an increased risk of birth defects [18].Several studies reported an increased risk of cerebral palsy and other neurological abnormalities in children conceived by ART [2]. But again, these findings are mainly attributed to complications resulting from multiple pregnancies including prematurity and low birth weight. The increased utilization of SET is therefore expected to result in fewer multiple pregnancies, which should result in a concomitant decrease in neurological complications. Further evidence that neurological complications in ART children are not exclusively related to ART came from studies that have assessed neurodevelopmental outcomes, such as locomotion, cognition, language and behavioural development of ART children in comparison with naturally conceived children. These analyses did not reveal any differences when adjusted for confounding factors of low birth weight and prematurity. In a similar vein, numerous studies have investigated whether there is an increased incidence of autism in ART-conceived children, but these have been inconclusive [19].There are potential concerns regarding the fertility of ART children. However, this requires future studies as most of this population is younger than 30 years of age. There is some evidence that boys conceived through ICSI have an increased rate of genital anomalies [2] and that males with severe infertility, such as low sperm counts, are more likely to carry chromosomal abnormalities, which could be passed on to their children conceived through ICSI [15].It has also been suggested that there might be an increased risk of cancers in ART-conceived offspring. Although multiple studies have identified no such risk, a large Swedish study reported a marginally increased risk of cancer, including haematologic, eye, nervous system, solid tumours and histiocytosis [2]. Similarly to other ART-related adverse health outcomes, it has been suggested that the increased risk of cancer could be attributed to prematurity, a recognized risk factor for cancer, rather than to the ART procedure itself. Further long-term studies are required to determine if there is truly an increased risk of adult cancers in ART offspring.…there remain unanswered questions about both the health risks associated with ART and the potential mechanisms that could account for these findingsOne thing is clear from the available evidence to date: there remain unanswered questions about both the health risks associated with ART and the potential mechanisms that could account for these findings. One possible explanation is that the exposure of gametes and preimplantation embryos to the various steps of ART might affect growth and development of offspring through dysregulation of epigenetic pathways [20]. In addition, there is evidence that genetic and epigenetic alterations might be inherited from the gametes of subfertile parents, which would reinforce assertions that subfertility itself might play a role in ART-related health outcomes [1,20].Epigenetics refers to heritable changes in gene expression without alterations to the underlying DNA sequence. DNA methylation and modifications of histones are epigenetic modifications that determine active against repressive conformation of chromatin structure, thereby regulating gene expression and driving essential processes such as embryonic development, fetal organ development, cell differentiation and tissue-specific gene expression [21]. Genomic imprinting is a type of epigenetic gene regulation that uses epigenetic marks to silence specifically one of the parental alleles. There are approximately 100 known imprinted genes in humans [22]. Most imprinted genes are found in clusters across the genome and are regulated by parent-specific DNA methylation and histone modification marks at cis-acting imprinting centres, as well as non-coding RNAs. Most of the known imprinted genes have functions related to growth and behaviour; disruption of the normally programmed parental expression of imprinted genes can therefore result in disorders related to growth and neurodevelopment.Gametogenesis and embryogenesis are important stages of mammalian development that require genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming. During spermatogenesis, protamines replace most histone proteins to create a highly compacted DNA. Establishment of DNA methylation imprints at paternally methylated imprinting centres is complete in males at the time of birth. In females, the establishment of maternally methylated imprinting centres begins during puberty and is almost complete in ovulated oocytes. After fertilization, the paternal genome undergoes rapid active DNA demethylation in which protamines are replaced by histones, whilst the maternal genome is passively demethylated, so that DNA methylation patterns are lost through cell divisions. Although, the whole genome undergoes demethylation, parent-specific DNA methylation is maintained at imprinting centres. Subsequently, the genome is remethylated and cell-type-specific epigenetic patterns are established as embryonic development proceeds. The parent-specific DNA methylation at imprinting centres is maintained in somatic cells, but it is erased and re-established in the gametes starting a new cycle of imprinting (Fig 1; [23]). As the establishment and maintenance of imprinting marks coincides in timing with important stages of ART, such as oocyte maturation under supraphysiological hormone concentrations and embryo culture, it has been proposed that ART can lead to imprinting errors [24].Open in a separate windowFigure 1Life cycle of genomic imprinting and assisted reproductive technology. Erasure, re-establishment and maintenance of genomic imprinting occur during gametogenesis and preimplantation embryo development. Blue and red solid lines show paternal and maternal methylation at imprinting centres through gametogenesis and early stages of preimplantation development. Imprinting marks are erased at early stages of gametogenesis. Re-establishment of imprinting occurs throughout gametogenesis, but finishes much later in oocytes compared with sperm. During preimplantation development, both maternal and paternal imprinting marks are maintained whilst the rest of the genome is demethylated. The paternal genome is demethylated rapidly and actively (dashed blue line) whilst the maternal genome is demethylated at a slower rate passively through cell division (dashed red line). Various steps of assisted reproductive technology such as ovarian stimulation, ovulation induction, gamete and embryo manipulation and culturing create unusual environments for gametes and embryos and thus, can interfere with proper establishment of imprinting marks in oocytes or maintenance of imprinting marks in embryos. Subfertility can be associated with epigenetic errors in imprinting erasure and/or establishment in both oocytes and sperm. Adapted from [23].In 2001, the first evidence that genomic imprinting can be perturbed during ART procedures came from studying sheep fetuses derived from in vitro cultured embryos that presented with large offspring syndrome (LOS; [25]). LOS occurs sporadically in cattle and sheep conceived by IVF and is characterized by a 20–30% increase in birth weight frequently accompanied by congenital anomalies and placental dysfunction [24]. Owing to phenotypic similarities of LOS to the human overgrowth disorder Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), which is caused by the dysregulation of gene expression within an imprinted cluster on chromosome 11p15.5, the authors hypothesized that genes from the orthologous cluster in sheep or a closely related pathway could be dysregulated in LOS. They tested expression of the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) gene known to be overexpressed in BWS, and the IGF2R receptor gene, which is involved in clearance of IGF2 from the circulation. IGF2R is imprinted in sheep but not in humans. In sheep with LOS, no differences for IGF2 were found, but reduced expression of IGF2R was observed after loss of DNA methylation at the imprinting centre for this gene [25].In the following decade, several studies provided further evidence that children conceived by ART might be at increased risk of imprinting disorders. The strongest case has been made for BWS and Angelman syndrome. BWS is the most common human overgrowth syndrome characterized by prenatal and postnatal overgrowth, congenital anomalies and tumour predisposition [26]. Angelman syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by microcephaly, severe intellectual disability and a unique behavioural profile including frequent laughter, smiling and excitability [27]. Multiple case reports from various countries indicate an increased frequency of BWS and Angelman syndrome in ART children (3–10-fold) compared with the general population. However, two cohort studies failed to replicate this association [28]. The low incidence of both BWS (1 in 13,700) and Angelman syndrome (1 in 15,000) in the general population [28] makes epidemiological studies difficult—the two cohort studies reported 2,492 and 6,052 ART children, respectively, and are probably underpowered to detect an increased risk of BWS and Angelman syndrome. However, even if there might be increased relative risks for these syndromes in ART children, the absolute risks in this population remain low.The molecular causes of BWS and Angelman syndrome are heterogeneous. They include genomic (deletion, uniparental disomy and gene mutation) and epigenetic (loss of imprinting due to aberrant DNA methylation) alterations at imprinted gene clusters on chromosomes 11p5.5 and 15q11–q13, respectively. These alterations occur with specific frequencies for each of the two disorders [26,27]. Results of molecular testing in children with these syndromes and conceived using ART, reveal an excess of epigenetic compared with genetic molecular alterations. For example, loss of DNA methylation at imprinting centre 2 occurs in about 50% of BWS cases in the general population, whereas several studies found loss of DNA methylation at imprinting centre 2 in 96% (27/28) of BWS ART-conceived children. In Angelman syndrome, approximately 3% of cases in the general population have loss of methylation at 15q11–13, whereas 5 out of 19 (26%) Angelman syndrome children conceived by ART or naturally by parents with a history of subfertility had loss of DNA methylation at 15q11–13 (Fig 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 2Enrichment of epigenetic alterations in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome and Angelman syndrome after assisted reproductive technology. Loss of methylation (LOM) at imprinting centre 2 (IC2) on chromosome 11p15.5 contributes to 50% of Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) cases in the general population, whereas LOM at IC2 is found in 27 out of 28 cases (96%) in the BWS assisted reproductive technology (ART) population, which represents a 1.9-fold enrichment of this epigenetic defect. For Angelman syndrome (AS), methylation disruption at the 15q11–q13 imprinting centre contributes to 3% of AS cases, and in the AS ART and subfertility population it was found in 5 out of 19 cases (26%; eight fold enrichment). Data from the following publications were used for these calculations, BWS [31,32,33,34,35] AS [35,36].The data for loss of DNA methylation in Angelman syndrome cases conceived naturally by subfertile parents highlights the fact that epigenetic alterations could, at least in part, result from underlying parental subfertility. Indeed, several studies have shown that abnormalities of spermatogenesis, such as oligospermia (low sperm concentration), low sperm motility or abnormal sperm morphology are associated with altered DNA methylation at imprinted loci. These occur in both maternal and paternal alleles of imprinting centres in sperm and could be transmitted to offspring conceived by ART [26]. One study of chromosomally normal fetuses spontaneously aborted at six to nine weeks of gestation found that DNA methylation alterations at imprinted loci were sometimes inherited from sperm. Thus, it is possible that this dysregulation of imprinting in male gametes might be one cause of the association between imprinting disorders and ART.Studies of other known imprinted syndromes, such as Prader–Willi syndrome, Russell–Silver syndrome, maternal and paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14, pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b and transient neonatal diabetes mellitus, have either not demonstrated an association with ART or have been inconclusive owing to their small size [29]. A link has also been suggested between ART and the newly defined ‘multiple maternal hypomethylation syndrome'', which clinically presents either as BWS or transient neonatal diabetes mellitus, and is associated with loss of DNA methylation at multiple maternally methylated imprinting centres; loss of methylation at paternal imprinting centres has not been reported so far. Thus, human imprinting disorders that have been observed with increased relative frequency in ART offspring are confined to loss of DNA methylation at maternally methylated imprinting centres, similar to epimutations of IGF2R in LOS. One could propose that ART has a greater impact on female than male gametes, as the eggs are subjected to more environmental exposures—supraphysiological doses of hormones—and more manipulation than the sperm. However, studies of mouse in vitro cultured embryos and ART-exposed human and mouse gametes suggest that ART can also be associated with either loss or gain of DNA methylation on both maternal and paternal alleles [23].Mouse models are a valuable method to investigate which stages of ART procedures can disrupt normal imprinting patterns. The advantage of using mouse models is the ability to investigate each of the parameters of ART—ovulation stimulation and embryo culturing—separately and at different stages of development. Furthermore, mouse models allow investigators to alter ART parameters, such as concentration of hormones or media for embryo culturing. Most importantly, studies in animal models have shown that ART procedures without the confounding factor of subfertility do have a negative impact on imprint regulation [23].The exposure of maturing oocytes from mice to abnormally high doses of gonadotropins has been suggested to alter imprint establishment. Yet, studies performed directly on superovulated oocytes are inconclusive, as not all of them have demonstrated increased rates of DNA methylation errors at imprint centres compared with spontaneously ovulated oocytes. Interestingly, studies of DNA methylation in mouse blastocysts harvested from superovulated mothers identified an increased rate of DNA methylation errors at imprint centres. This included loss of DNA methylation at the paternally methylated H19—the imprinting centre on human chromosome 11 and mouse chromosome 7 implicated in BWS and the related undergrowth Russell–Silver syndrome. It suggests that superovulation also impairs imprinting maintenance; probably by affecting the ability of the oocyte to synthesize and store sufficient maternal factors (RNA and proteins; [23]). In support of this hypothesis, four maternal effect proteins have been previously identified that are involved in imprinting maintenance in preimplantation embryos. It was also found that imprint errors arise in blastocysts in a dose-dependent manner—higher doses of hormones resulted in DNA methylation errors in a larger number of embryos [23].As the establishment and maintenance of imprinting marks coincides in timing with important stages of ART […] it has been proposed that ART can lead to imprinting errorsAnother factor that might contribute to imprinting errors is the micromanipulation of gametes during IVF and ICSI procedures. Evidence supporting this hypothesis includes the observation in mouse models that a higher number of IVF embryos—resulting from superovulation alone or superovulation and embryo culturing—have aberrant H19 DNA methylation compared with in vivo conceived embryos [23]. Media with varying compositions are used in ART clinics, and whilst all of the media are suboptimal for normal maintenance of all DNA imprints in mouse embryos, the number of embryos with aberrant DNA methylation at imprinting centres varies depending on the media [23]. Interestingly, it was also found that embryos with faster rates of development are more prone to loss of DNA methylation at imprinting centres [23].Though it is not yet clear how these findings relate to ART in humans, the mouse research is crucial for informing human studies about which variables should be addressed to optimize the safety and efficacy of ART procedures. Apart from ART itself, it has been shown that compromised fertility in mice results in loss or delay of DNA methylation acquisition in one of three tested imprinted genes. The compromised fertility is induced by genetic manipulation of a gene involved in communication between oocytes and surrounding follicular cells, which is crucial for proper oocyte maturation. The results suggest that the observed loss of DNA methylation could be caused by impaired transport of metabolites from follicular cells to oocytes, which is important for imprint establishment [23].Data linking dysregulation of imprinted loci and ART is limited to several imprinted gene clusters associated with clinically recognizable syndromes. However, there are more genes in the human genome that have been discovered to be, or are predicted to be, imprinted [22] but are not yet known to be associated with clinical phenotypes. Potentially, ART can lead to dysregulation of these imprinted genes, which might be another, as yet unrecognized factor contributing to neonatal and long-term health problems of ART-conceived children. At this point, it is also not clear whether epigenetic disruption during ART is limited to imprinted genes or has more global effects on the genome. The data for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis are limited in both human and mouse to individuals with no apparent disease phenotype. So far, these data have been inconclusive [23,28].One could propose that ART has a greater impact on female than male gametes, as the eggs are subjected to more environmental exposures […] and more manipulation than the spermDespite significant advances in the efficacy and success of ART procedures during the past few decades, the health risks, especially related to long-term outcomes in ART-conceived children, remain poorly understood. Moreover, the phenomena known as ‘fetal programming''—when maternal and in utero exposures can lead to various adult onset disease susceptibilities—have been suggested to be transmissible to the next generations, probably through epigenetic mechanisms [30]. In the case of ART procedures, the effect of ‘unusual'' environments during gametogenesis and early embryonic development on adult-onset disease and trans-generational inheritance is still not clear. Additional research is needed to elucidate the effects of ART on genome-wide epigenetic patterns and their link to human disease. As ART will continue to be an important medical intervention and the number of children born with the help of ART procedures will probably continue to rise in the future, it is crucial to understand the associated health risks and underlying molecular mechanisms of these technologies. This will increase the safety of this intervention and enable couples using ART to be fully informed regarding both present and future health-related risks.? Open in a separate windowDaria GrafodatskayaOpen in a separate windowCheryl CytrynbaumOpen in a separate windowRosanna Weksberg     

Assisted Reproductive Technology affects developmental kinetics, <Emphasis Type="Italic">H19</Emphasis> Imprinting Control Region methylation and <Emphasis Type="Italic">H19</Emphasis>gene expression in individual mouse embryos

Background  

In the last few years, an increase in imprinting anomalies has been reported in children born from Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Various clinical and experimental studies also suggest alterations of embryo development after ART. Therefore, there is a need for studying early epigenetic anomalies which could result from ART manipulations, especially on single embryos. In this study, we evaluated the impact of superovulation, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo culture conditions on proper genomic imprinting and blastocyst development in single mouse embryos.     

Homocysteine

Homocysteine does not occur in the diet but it is an essential intermediate in normal mammalian metabolism of methionine. Each compound, methionine or homocysteine, is the precursor of the other. Similarly, the synthesis of one is the mechanism for the detoxification of the other. The ubiquitous methionine cycle is the metabolic basis for this relationship. In some tissues the transsulfuration pathway diverts homocysteine from the cycle and provides a means for the synthesis of cysteine and its derivatives. Methionine, (or homocysteine) metabolism is regulated by the disposition of homocysteine between these competing sequences. Both pathways require vitamin-derived cofactors, pyridoxine for transsulfuration and both folate and cobalamin in the methionine cycle. The clinical consequences of disruption of these pathways was apparent first in rare inborn errors of metabolism that cause homocystinuria, but recent studies focus on "hyperhomocysteinemia"--a lesser metabolic impairment that may result from genetic variations, acquired pathology, toxicity and nutritional inadequacy. Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk factor for thrombovascular diseases however it is not clear whether the minimally increased concentration of the amino acid is the causative agent or merely a marker for the pathology. Until we resolve that question we cannot predict the potential efficacy of therapies based on folate administration with or without additional cobalamin and pyridoxine.