Maxillary volume growth in craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis, and in particular, craniofacial dysostosis, exhibits abnormalities of the nasomaxillary complex in form, position, and development. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the volumetric maxillary abnormality in patients at the time of initial diagnosis of craniosynostosis and to make comparisons with a "normal" reference range for maxillary volumes throughout childhood. The technique of segmentation was applied to preoperative computed tomographic head scans obtained in 31 children (14 boys, 17 girls), between 1 and 34 months of age (mean, 11.06 months), who underwent cranial expansion surgery for craniosynostosis affecting the coronal suture complex. Maxillary volumes were plotted against age for the first 3 years of life and were compared with a healthy population. There was no statistical difference between the two sexes for mean maxillary volume. The mean maxillary volumes for the entire group were statistically smaller than the norm (p = 0.046, linear regression with age as a covariable), but there was no statistical difference among the four different groups of coronal synostosis (unilateral coronal, nonsyndromic bilateral coronal, nonsyndromic complex pansynostosis, syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis) (p = 0.407, one-way analysis of variance). On graphic data analysis, the maxillary volume was smaller than the norm in craniosynostotic children who presented in the first few months of life. However, by 7 months of age in nonsyndromic bilateral coronal synostosis and by 17 months of age in syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis, the maxillary volumes had increased toward the norm. This implies that the effect of the craniosynostotic process on the midface structures is present from birth and parallels the effect on the cranial vault sutures.     

Craniofacial variation and growth in the Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome

A study of anthropometric variation and craniofacial growth in individuals with the Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome (PLWS) illustrates the utility of anthropometry in clinical evaluation and research. Anthropometric measurements, including head length and breadth, minimum frontal diameter, and head circumference, were obtained on 38 PLWS individuals (21 with chromosome 15 deletions) with an age range from 2 weeks to 39 years. No anthropometric differences were found between the two chromosome subgroups. A relative deceleration in the growth of certain craniofacial dimensions (head circumference and length) is suggested by the negative correlations between age and Z-scores for the measurements. Raw values for minimum frontal diameter and head breadth were near or below the 5th percentile curve, while almost all values for head length and circumference fell within normal limits. The data support suggestions that dolichocephaly be considered an early diagnostic feature of PLWS. Furthermore, the status of narrow bifrontal diameter as a major feature of PLWS is confirmed.     

Craniofacial anthropometric analysis in Down's syndrome patients

Past investigations of Down's syndrome (DS) have indicated that there are marked abnormalities in the craniofacial morphology. The aim of this study was to establish the craniofacial anthropometric variables which discriminate DS group from healthy population and also to observe the changes occurring with growth. Using noninvasive method of craniofacial anthropometry, craniofacial pattern profile (CFPP) analysis (from twenty-five anthropometric measurements per person) was performed in 104 DS individuals and 365 healthy controls, aged seven to fifty-seven and divided into four age ranges. Z-scores were calculated for each variable and the variations in the craniofacial region have been identified by multivariate discriminative analysis. The results showed that three variables (head length (g-op), head circumference (OFC) and outer canthal distance (ex-ex) were responsible for 85.68% variability (p < 0.001). The analysis of z-scores showed that the majority of variables were in subnormal (under -2 SD) and normal range (from -2SD to +2SD), but none of them was in the supernormal range (over the +2SD). Some craniofacial characteristics are age-related. On the basis of craniofacial anthropometric traits it was possible to separate even 91.35% of DS patients from the healthy population. It could be concluded that these findings demonstrate the usefulness of application of CFPP in defining abnormal craniofacial dimensions in DS individuals.     

Craniofacial growth in juvenile Macaca mulatta: A cephalometric study

This paper describes a study of normal craniofacial growth of the juvenile rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Serial data of 13 young monkeys of specific dental age were studied for a five month period by cephalometric radiography and the metallic implant technique. Growth patterns were described and localized growth changes quantified to determine the range of variability. Variability was found within areas of specific bones, e.g., the gonial region of the mandible, and in the relative degree of change of interbony relationships, e.g., maxillo-mandibular. There was generally less variability for most measures in this study than usually found in man. Compensatory factors, such as the adaptability of the dentition and the selective apposition and resorption of osseous surfaces minimized the occlusion expression of this observed variation, for all animals maintained a constant Class I molar relationship during the period studied.     

Craniofacial growth in apert syndrome as measured by finite-element scaling analysis

A new tool for the study of biological form change is applied in a comparison of craniofacial growth in normal children and those affected with Apert syndrome. Using finite-element scaling analysis, the magnitude of size change during postnatal growth in the Apert sample was determined to be generally less than normal, and the magnitude of shape change was generally greater than normal. No consistent, statistically significant, alteration from normal growth was defined in the Apert sample, however. There appears to be no consistent effect on general cell and tissue proliferation in Apert syndrome. Rather, specific subpopulations of cells and tissues may be affected differentially over time.     

Coronal ring involvement in patients treated for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis

The etiopathology of the clinical entity normally referred to as unilateral coronal synostosis is commonly used to connote unilateral fusion of the frontoparietal suture. However, other sutures in the coronal ring may exhibit synostosis concomitant with or independent from frontoparietal synostosis and give rise to similar clinical phenotypes. This study retrospectively analyzes high-resolution computed tomographic data sets to determine patency of sutures within the coronal ring. Computed tomographic scan digital data from 33 infants who subsequently underwent surgical correction of unilateral coronal synostosis were assessed for sutural patency using Analyze imaging software. The frontosphenoidal suture was subdivided into intraorbital frontosphenoidal and extraorbital frontosphenoidal portions, and the patency of the frontoethmoidal suture was also assessed. Patients were sorted into two groups on the basis of the status of their frontosphenoidal sutures: group 1 had patent frontosphenoidal but synostotic frontoparietal sutures (n = 21) and group 2 had both frontosphenoidal and frontoparietal synostoses. Observer reproducibility was tested. The vertical and horizontal dimensions of the bony orbit and the endocranial base deflection angle were measured with the observer blinded with regard to sutural status group. Frontoethmoidal synostosis was not noted in any patients in either group. Two patients had no frontoparietal suture synostosis with isolated intraorbital frontosphenoidal and extraorbital frontosphenoidal suture closures. Suture diagnosis reproducibility was 99 percent. In group 1, the ipsilateral-to-contralateral vertical orbit dimension ratio averaged 1.11, whereas in group 2 it averaged 1.04 (p < 0.05). The ratio of horizontal orbit measurements was not significantly different between groups. In both groups, the endocranial base was deflected ipsilateral to the synostotic frontoparietal suture, with an average angle of 12 degrees in group 1 and 17 degrees in group 2 (p < 0.005). The extent of synostosis along the coronal sutural ring contributes to the dysmorphology of the orbit and the endocranial base deflection in patients whose clinical phenotypic diagnosis is unilateral coronal synostosis.     

Craniofacial features associated with amelogenesis imperfecta

Craniofacial alterations occur with increased frequency in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI). The purpose of this study was to characterize the craniofacial features associated with AI in families from the US. Twenty-seven people with AI and 14 unaffected family members from nine separate kindreds were evaluated. The diagnosis was established by history, clinical, and radiographic examination, and histological and or biochemical analysis of enamel. The kindreds were generally classified as hypoplastic AI (HPAI), hypocalcified AI (HCAI), or hypomaturation AI (HMAI) and then further subclassified based on phenotype and mode of inheritance. Linear and angular cephalometric measures were converted to z-scores using gender/age matched values from the Bolton and Behrent's standards. Statistical analyses included t-tests and ANOVA accepting P < or = 0.05 as significant. The vertical dimension of the lower face was significantly increased (ANSMe; P = 0.001), especially in affected individuals compared with unaffected relatives, in all kindreds with HCAI and HMAI but in only one kindred with autosomal recessive rough AI. Clinically, an anterior open bite (overbite < 0 mm) was observed in 26% of all dentate individuals with AI and none of their unaffected relatives. Skeletal morphology was highly variable depending on the AI type and kindred. While this study shows an association of altered craniofacial morphology with certain AI kindreds, the relationship of the AI genotype to the observed malocclusions remains to be defined.     

Craniofacial growth of fetal Macaca nemestrina: A cephalometric roentgenographic study

The prenatal growth of the macaque craniofacial skeleton is described using lateral radiographs of 82 fetal and 25 neonatal Macaca nemestrina whose known gestational ages range from 50 to 186 days. The ossification sequence of the craniofacial bones resembles that in the human fetus. During gestation, the macaque neurocranium loses its round, globular shape, becoming flattened and elongated in an anteroposterior direction. In contrast, the morphologic pattern of the face is established early in fetal life, and little change takes place during the remaining prenatal period. The macaque craniofacial dimensions develop along the general skeletal growth pattern, unlike the human craniofacial dimensions, which follow an intermediate pattern between the neural and general skeletal patterns. However, despite minor differences, the macaque and human fetal faces follow the same basic patterns of growth.     

Craniofacial sutures: morphology, growth, and in vivo masticatory strains.

The growth and morphology of craniofacial sutures are thought to reflect their functional environment. However, little is known about in vivo sutural mechanics. The present study investigates the strains experienced by the internasal, nasofrontal, and anterior interfrontal sutures during masticatory activity in 4-6-month-old miniature swine (Sus scrofa). Measurements of the bony/fibrous arrangements and growth rates of these sutures were then examined in the context of their mechanical environment. Large tensile strains were measured in the interfrontal suture (1,036 microepsilon +/- 400 SD), whereas the posterior internasal suture was under moderate compression (-440 microepsilon +/- 238) and the nasofrontal suture experienced large compression (-1,583 microepsilon +/- 506). Sutural interdigitation was associated with compressive strain. The collagen fibers of the internasal and interfrontal sutures were clearly arranged to resist compression and tension, respectively, whereas those of the nasofrontal suture could not be readily characterized as either compression or tension resisting. The average linear rate of growth over a 1-week period at the nasofrontal suture (133.8 micrometer, +/- 50.9 S.D) was significantly greater than that of both the internasal and interfrontal sutures (39.2 micrometer +/- 11.4 and 65. 5 micrometer +/- 14.0, respectively). Histological observations suggest that the nasofrontal suture contains chondroid tissue, which may explain the unexpected combination of high compressive loading and rapid growth in this suture.     

Management of craniosynostosis

Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Review the etiopathogenesis of craniosynostosis and craniofacial anomalies. 2. Develop a basic understanding of the clinical manifestations and diagnosis of craniofacial anomalies. 3. Describe the surgical principles of managing craniosynostosis and craniofacial anomalies.Craniosynostosis, or the premature closure of calvarial sutures, results in deformed calvaria at birth. Although the etiology of craniosynostosis is currently unknown, animal experiments and a recent interest in molecular biology point toward interplay between the dura and the underlying brain. This interaction occurs by means of a local alteration in the expression of transforming growth factor, MSX2, fibroblast growth factor receptor, and TWIST. The fused suture restricts growth of the calvaria, thus leading to a characteristic deformation, each associated with a different type of craniosynostosis. Uncorrected craniosynostosis leads to a continuing progression of the deformity, and in some cases, an elevation of intracranial pressure. Clinical examination should include not only an examination of the skull but also a general examination to rule out the craniofacial syndromes that accompany craniosynostosis. Because deformational plagiocephaly, or plagiocephaly without synostosis, occurs secondary to sleeping in the supine position during the early perinatal period, the physician should be aware of this abnormality. Treatment for deformational plagiocephaly is conservative when compared with treatment for craniosynostosis, which requires surgery. Appropriate investigations should include genetic screening, radiologic examination with a computerized tomographic scan, and neurodevelopmental analysis. Surgical intervention should be performed during infancy, preferably in the first 6 months of postnatal life, to prevent the further progression of the deformity and possible complications associated with increased intracranial pressure. The principles of surgical intervention are not only to excise the fused suture but also to attempt to normalize the calvarial shape. Long-term follow-up is critical to determine the effect of the surgical outcome.     

Craniofacial dermoids

Thirty-two patients with nasal dermal sinuses and cysts were treated during the 10-year period from 1978 to 1987. These patients presented with midline cysts (N = 18) or sinus ostia (N = 14). Only 6 of the 32 patients manifested intracranial extension (19 percent). All the patients with intracranial extension exhibited an intracranial mass on preoperative CT scans. Ten patients with no CT evidence of intracranial mass were noted to have only a fibrous cord extending to the base of the foramen cecum. In 4 of these 10 patients, craniotomy confirmed that there was no intracranial extension of the dermoid. Four other patients presented with sinus ostia at the base of the columella. None of these 4 patients had intracranial extension. Clinical examination and preoperative CT scans provide most of the information needed to determine the nature, course, and extent of these lesions.     

Craniofacial anomalies in twins

Studies of twins provide insight into the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors in the causality of structural anomalies. Thirty-five affected twin pairs were identified from a group of 1114 patients with congenital craniofacial deformities evaluated from 1972 to 1989. Forty-three of these 70 twins exhibited one or more craniofacial anomalies; these were analyzed for dysmorphic characteristics, zygosity, concordance, and family history. The anomalies were categorized into two groups: malformations and deformations. The malformations (n = 36) included hemifacial microsomia (n = 10), cleft lip and palate (n = 8), cleft palate (n = 4), rare facial cleft (n = 2), craniosynostosis (n = 2), Binder syndrome (n = 2), Treacher Collins syndrome (n = 2), craniopagus (n = 2), CHARGE association (n = 1), frontonasal dysplasia (n = 2), and constricted ears (n = 1). The deformations (n = 7) included plagiocephaly (n = 5), hemifacial hypoplasia (n = 1), and micrognathia (n = 1). Twenty-one monozygotic and 14 dizygotic twin pairs were identified. The concordance rate was 33 percent for monozygotic twins and 7 percent for dizygotic twins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Skull expansion in experimental craniosynostosis

Bilateral coronal suture immobilization was performed in 9-day-old rabbits to simulate the brachycephaly deformity characteristic of coronal synostosis. Growth abnormalities were documented by serial radiographic cephalometry. A "corrective" linear craniectomy procedure was performed on the rabbits with an immobilized coronal suture at 60 days of age. The degree of amelioration of the induced abnormalities by the surgery in these animals was compared with a similar group of animals that had the same surgery plus supplemental implantation of a spring expansion device at the coronal suture craniectomy site. The mean marker separation at the coronal suture was significantly greater (5.61 mm +/- 0.52 SE versus 2.53 mm +/- 0.38 SE; p less than 0.05) following spring expander implantation than with linear craniectomy alone. Similarly, induced anterior cranial base shortening and distortion of craniofacial cephalometrics were more significantly improved by the additional use of the spring expansion device.     

Mutational identification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 genes in craniosynostosis in Indian population

OBJECTIVE:

The Objective of this study was to identify the association of mutation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), FGFR2 genes with syndromic as well as non-syndromic craniosynostosis in Indian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of our records from January 2008 to December 2012 was done. A total of 41 cases satisfying the inclusion criteria and 51 controls were taken for the study. A total volume of 3 ml blood from the patient as well as parents was taken. Deoxyribonucleic acid extracted using phenol chloroform extraction method followed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method.

RESULTS:

There were 33 (80.4%) non-syndromic cases of craniosynostosis while 8 (19.5%) were syndromic. Out of these 8 syndromic cases, 4 were Apert syndrome, 3 were Crouzon syndrome and 1 Pfeiffer syndrome. Phenotypically the most common non-syndromic craniosynostosis was scaphocephaly (19, 57.7%) followed by plagiocephaly in (14, 42.3%). FGFR1 mutation (Pro252Arg) was seen in 1 (2.4%) case of non-syndromic craniosynostosis while no association was noted either with FGFR1 or with FGFR2 mutation in syndromic cases. None of the control group showed any mutation.

CONCLUSION:

Our study proposed that FGFR1, FGFR2 mutation, which confers predisposition to craniosynostosis does not exist in Indian population when compared to the western world.     

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T variant in Indian children with craniosynostosis: Its role in the pathogenesis,risk of craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND:

677C to T allele in the 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene has been implicated in the etiology of various syndromes and nonsyndromic diseases but till date no direct studies have been reported with craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim was to study the family-based association of MTHFR polymorphism in different categories of craniosynostosis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This was a cross-sectional study in which 30 patients classified as Apert syndrome, Pfeiffr syndrome and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients with their family were recruited. A sample of 3 ml intravenous blood was taken from patients and from their family members (father and mother) in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-anticoagulated vacutainer for the purpose of the study. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes by phenol chloroform extraction method. Primers for MTHFR gene were designed. The polymerase chain reaction was carried out. After successful amplification, a small aliquot (5 μl) of the MTHFR reaction mixture was treated with 1 units of Hinf I restriction enzyme (NEB). Results were obtained and compiled.

RESULTS:

A total of 30 patients/participants with craniosynostosis of Indian descent and their parents formed the study group. The genotyping did not confirm an association between the MTHFR 677C to T polymorphism and between different categories of craniosynostosis. When comparing the offspring of mothers statistically significant differences were found.

CONCLUSION:

C667T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene is unlikely to play a role in the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis though maternal MTHFR C677T polymorphism may be a genetic risk factor.     

Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis.

Intracranial volume and intracranial pressure have been measured in 66 children with craniosynostosis, 48 boys and 18 girls. The premature fusion of skull sutures is assumed to restrict skull growth and predispose to elevated intracranial pressure. Thirteen children (20 percent) had raised intracranial pressure and demonstrated a significant restriction of skull growth. In this series, volume measurement alone, however, did not serve as a reliable predictor that the intracranial pressure was raised.