Experimental unilateral coronal synostosis in rabbits

Immobilization of the coronal suture was produced unilaterally in 9-day-old rabbits to determine its effect on subsequent craniofacial development. The suture was immobilized unilaterally by the topical application of methylcyanoacrylate adhesive. Subsequent growth effects on the cranial vault, base, and facial skeleton were assessed by serial radiographic cephalometry. Unilateral coronal suture immobilization resulted in significantly decreased bone growth at the coronal suture (mean 0.95 mm +/- 0.35 SE) when compared to sham-treated control animals (mean 5.06 mm +/- 0.20 SE). Frontonasal suture bone growth contralateral to the immobilized half of the coronal suture, however, was significantly increased. The anterior cranial base became significantly shortened, and orbital asymmetry developed. The pattern of induced abnormalities simulates unilateral coronal synostosis in humans.     

Preoperative anthropometric dysmorphology in metopic synostosis

Anthropometric identification of dysmorphology in craniofacial anomalies, including the craniosynostoses, provides invaluable assistance in clinical diagnosis as well as offering a technique for interpreting possible deformities in skeletal remains. Premature closure of the metopic suture is a rare form of craniosynostosis, representing about 4% of clinically diagnosed synostoses. Accompanying this closure are defects of the head and face, particularly the upper face and orbits. To identify quantitatively the craniofacial dysmorphology associated with metopic synostosis, 50 patients with a diagnosis of primary (nonsyndromal) metopic synostosis were examined using a battery of 24 anthropometric measurements from which 11 proportion indices were calculated. The data were compared to sex- and age-matched normal standards and converted to standard (Z) scores before being analyzed using Student's t-test. The data indicate a complex pattern of dysmorphology arising from the synostosis which affects the upper face and orbits as well as the cranial vault. The entire fronto-orbito-zygomatic complex is narrowed, and vertex is reduced. There is compensatory sagittal and transverse growth of the posterior neurocranium and compensatory vertical and sagittal growth of the upper face. There are statistically significant differences in the pattern of dysmorphology between patients presenting prior to 6 months of age and those older but no significant differences between sexes. Am J Phys Anthropol 103:341–351, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Correction of unilateral coronal synostosis leads to resolution of mandibular asymmetry in rabbits

Mandibular dysmorphology in unilateral coronal synostosis has been recognized clinically. In patients with unilateral coronal synostosis, the chin point deviates away from the affected side. To investigate whether this mandibular asymmetry resolves after correction of unilateral coronal synostosis, familial nonsyndromic rabbits were used. Rabbits with unilateral coronal synostosis that underwent "correction" with resection of the affected suture were compared with "uncorrected" rabbits with unilateral coronal synostosis and normal, wild-type rabbits (n = 36; three equal groups of 12). Serial lateral cephalograms obtained at 10, 25, 42, and 84 days showed no asymmetries in wild-type rabbits and progressive asymmetries in the ramal height and mandibular length in uncorrected unilateral coronal synostosis rabbits. However, in corrected unilateral coronal synostosis rabbits, existing asymmetries at 10 and 25 days improved by 42 days and were not seen by maturity, at 84 days. In dry, mature, mandibular specimens, wild-type rabbits showed equal side-to-side measurements and uncorrected unilateral coronal synostosis rabbits showed the following on the affected side: longer ramal height (15 percent), shorter ramal width (13 percent), longer body height (10 percent), and shorter body width (13 percent). By contrast, the corrected unilateral coronal synostosis specimens showed no side-to-side differences in 10 of 11. There were no asymmetries in condylar shape or condylar volume in any of the three groups. Cranial base measurements showed asymmetries of the uncorrected unilateral coronal synostosis specimens that were consistent with an anteriorly positioned glenoid fossa on the affected side. However, only one of 11 corrected unilateral coronal synostosis specimens showed similar cranial base asymmetries. The data showed that mandibular asymmetries in nonsyndromic, familial rabbits with unilateral coronal synostosis are progressive with growth but improve after correction of synostosis.     

Molecular analysis of patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis)

Mutations in genes known to be responsible for most of the recognizable syndromes associated with bilateral coronal synostosis can be detected by molecular testing. The genetic alterations that could cause unilateral coronal synostosis are more elusive. It is recognized that FGFR and TWIST mutations can give rise to either bilateral or unilateral coronal synostosis, even in the same family. The authors undertook a prospective study of patients presenting with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis) to Children's Hospital Boston during the period from 1997 to 2000. Mutational analysis was performed on all patients and on selected parents whenever familial transmission was suspected. Intraoperative anthropometry was used in an effort to differentiate those patients in whom a mutation was detected from those in whom it was not. The anthropometric measures included bilateral sagittal orbital-globe distance, inter medial canthal distance, and nasal angulation. Macrocephaly and palpebral angulation were also considered possible determinants. There was a 2:1 female preponderance in 47 patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. Mutations were found in eight of 47 patients: two patients with different single-amino-acid changes in FGFR2, three patients with FGFR3 Pro250Arg, and three patients with TWIST mutations. Another patient had craniofrontonasal syndrome for which a causative locus has been mapped to chromosome X, although molecular testing is not yet available. Two features were strongly associated with a detectable mutation in patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly: asymmetrical brachycephaly (retrusion of both supraorbital rims) and orbital hypertelorism. Other abnormalities in the craniofacial region and extremities were clues to a particular mutation in FGFR2, FGFR3, TWIST, or the X-linked mutation. Neither macrocephaly nor degree of nasal angulation nor relative vertical position of the lateral canthi correlated with mutational detection. An additional four patients in this study had either unilateral or bilateral coronal synostosis in an immediate relative and had anthropometric findings that predicted a mutation, and yet no genetic alteration was found. This suggests either that the authors' screening methods were not sufficiently sensitive or that perhaps there are other unknown pathogenic loci. Nevertheless, molecular testing is recommended for infants who have unilateral coronal synostosis, particularly if there are the anthropometric findings highlighted in this study or an otherwise suspicious feature in the child or a parent. Infants with either an identified or a suspected mutation usually need bilateral asymmetric advancement of the bandeau and may be more likely to require frontal revision in childhood.     

Molecular diagnosis of bilateral coronal synostosis.

The authors performed a prospective study evaluating molecular diagnosis in patients with bilateral coronal synostosis. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) those clinically classified as having Apert, Crouzon, or Pfeiffer syndrome and (2) those clinically unclassified and labeled as having brachycephaly. Blood samples were drawn for genomic DNA analysis from 57 patients from 1995 to 1997. Polymerase chain reactions were performed using primers flanking exons in FGFR 1, 2, and 3. Each exon was screened for mutations using single-strand confirmation polymorphism, and mutations were identified by DNA sequencing. Mutations in FGFR2 or FGFR3 were found in all patients (n = 38) assigned a phenotypic (eponymous) diagnosis. All Apert syndrome patients (n = 13) carried one of the two known point mutations in exon 7 of FGFR2 (Ser252Trp and Pro253Arg). Twenty-five patients were diagnosed as having either Crouzon or Pfeiffer syndrome. Five patients with Crouzon syndrome of variable severity had mutations in exon 7 of FGFR2. Fifteen patients (12 with Crouzon, 3 with Pfeiffer) had a mutation in exon 9 of FGFR2, many of which involved loss or gain of a cysteine residue. A wide phenotypic range was observed in patients with identical mutations, including those involving cysteine. Two patients labeled as having Crouzon syndrome had the Pro250Arg mutation in exon 7 of FGFR3. All three patients with the crouzonoid phenotype and acanthosis nigricans had the same mutation in exon 10 of FGFR3 (Ala391Glu). This is a distinct disorder, characterized by jugular foraminal stenosis, Chiari I anomaly, and intracranial venous hypertension. Mutations were found in 14 of 19 clinically unclassifiable patients. Three mutations were in exon 9, and one was in the donor splice site of intron 9 on FGFR2. The most common mutation discovered in this group was Pro250Arg in exon 7 of FGFR3. These patients (n = 10) had either bilateral or unilateral coronal synostosis, minimal midfacial hypoplasia with class I or class II occlusion, and minor brachysyndactyly. No mutations in FGFR 1, 2, or 3 were detected in five patients with nonspecific brachycephaly. In conclusion, a molecular diagnosis was possible in all patients (n = 38) given a phenotypic (eponymous) diagnosis. Different phenotypes observed with identical mutations probably resulted from modulation by their genetic background. A molecular diagnosis was made in 74 percent of the 19 unclassified patients in this series; all mutations were in FGFR2 or FGFR3. Our data and those of other investigators suggest that we should begin integrating molecular diagnosis with phenotypic diagnosis of craniosynostoses in studies of natural history and dysmorphology and in analyses of surgical results.     

Bilateral aplasia of the thumb, proximal radioulnar synostosis and unilateral synostosis of metacarpals 4 and 5

We present a boy with bilateral aplasia of the thumb, bilateral proximal radioulnar synostosis and unilateral fusion of metacarpals 4 and 5. Apart from a small, asymptomatic ASD, no other abnormalities were noted.     

Coronal ring involvement in patients treated for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis

The etiopathology of the clinical entity normally referred to as unilateral coronal synostosis is commonly used to connote unilateral fusion of the frontoparietal suture. However, other sutures in the coronal ring may exhibit synostosis concomitant with or independent from frontoparietal synostosis and give rise to similar clinical phenotypes. This study retrospectively analyzes high-resolution computed tomographic data sets to determine patency of sutures within the coronal ring. Computed tomographic scan digital data from 33 infants who subsequently underwent surgical correction of unilateral coronal synostosis were assessed for sutural patency using Analyze imaging software. The frontosphenoidal suture was subdivided into intraorbital frontosphenoidal and extraorbital frontosphenoidal portions, and the patency of the frontoethmoidal suture was also assessed. Patients were sorted into two groups on the basis of the status of their frontosphenoidal sutures: group 1 had patent frontosphenoidal but synostotic frontoparietal sutures (n = 21) and group 2 had both frontosphenoidal and frontoparietal synostoses. Observer reproducibility was tested. The vertical and horizontal dimensions of the bony orbit and the endocranial base deflection angle were measured with the observer blinded with regard to sutural status group. Frontoethmoidal synostosis was not noted in any patients in either group. Two patients had no frontoparietal suture synostosis with isolated intraorbital frontosphenoidal and extraorbital frontosphenoidal suture closures. Suture diagnosis reproducibility was 99 percent. In group 1, the ipsilateral-to-contralateral vertical orbit dimension ratio averaged 1.11, whereas in group 2 it averaged 1.04 (p < 0.05). The ratio of horizontal orbit measurements was not significantly different between groups. In both groups, the endocranial base was deflected ipsilateral to the synostotic frontoparietal suture, with an average angle of 12 degrees in group 1 and 17 degrees in group 2 (p < 0.005). The extent of synostosis along the coronal sutural ring contributes to the dysmorphology of the orbit and the endocranial base deflection in patients whose clinical phenotypic diagnosis is unilateral coronal synostosis.     

Exposure through a coronal incision for initial treatment of facial fractures.

The coronal incision approach to Le Fort III fractures gives excellent exposure for anatomical reduction and internal fixation of the fracture sites. Either an extracranial, or a combined intracranial procedure, is feasible. The exposure obtained not only facilitates the reduction and the fixation but, with the addition of transconjunctival incisions, the patient benefits by not having multiple surgical scars in the face.     

Effect of unilateral partial facial paralysis on periosteal growth at the muscle-bone interface of facial muscles and facial bones

In a previous study, the influence of the midfacial musculature upon growth and development of the maxilla and mandible was established macroscopically. Dry skull measurements revealed a reduced premaxillary, maxillary, mandibular, and anterior corpus length with a simultaneous increase in mandibular ramal height on the paralyzed side. It was demonstrated that these reduced premaxillary and maxillary lengths were among others the result of reduced nasofrontal growth, whereas the increased ramal height was accompanied by condylar growth alterations. This study investigated whether the growth alterations at the mandibular corpus region could be explained by altered periosteal growth at the muscle-bone interface of the zygomatico-auricular muscle and the mandibular corpus, caused by altered muscle activity acting upon the periosteal sleeve. Fifty-six 12-day-old New Zealand White rabbits were randomly assigned to either a control or an experimental group. In the experimental group, left-sided partial facial paralysis was induced surgically when the animals were 12 days old. To study the muscle-bone interface, seven follow-up time intervals were defined between 3.5 and 60 days following the surgery. At these time intervals, four randomly selected control animals and four randomly selected experimental animals were killed. The anterior mandibular corpus region with the muscle-bone interface of the left control hemimandible and the left and right experimental hemimandibles was processed for undecalcified tissue preparation. Quantitative analysis of the total bone area at the muscle-bone interface revealed no significant differences between the left control hemimandible and the left and right experimental hemimandibles. Also, qualitative study of the histologic sections showed no major changes in the appearance or development of the trabecular pattern between the groups. However, slight differences in the distribution pattern of osteoblasts and osteoclasts along the bony surface were found between the left control hemimandible and the left and right experimental hemimandibles, which seemed to explain the alterations in mandibular corpus shape between these groups. It was suggested that these changes in the distribution pattern of osteoblasts and osteoclasts were the result of changes in the loading distribution pattern acting upon the mandible, caused by an altered neuromuscular recruitment pattern of the remaining functionally intact, mandibularly attached muscles. The latter was probably the result of adaptive mandibular positioning in response to an altered occlusal relationship, which was induced by the abnormal maxillary growth as a result of the unilateral partial facial paralysis.     

Craniofacial pattern profile (CFPP) evaluation of facial dysmorphology in a familial syndrome with corneal anesthesia and multiple congenital anomalies

Roentgencephalometric findings are presented for a family with an unusual facial morphology. Twenty measurements defining the size and shape of major anatomic areas of the head and face were taken. The measurements were transformed into Z-scores. Using the sigma z (i.e., standard deviation of the Z-scores) value, an estimate of craniofacial pattern deviation from the norms was made for each family member. All members of this family have highly aberrant, i.e., dysmorphic, craniofacial pattern profiles. Familial as well as syndromic craniofacial similarities vs. dissimilarities between Z-score values of pairs of family members were assessed by the Pearson's correlation coefficient rz. Results of correlation coefficients demonstrate a high level (far in excess of the expected value of rz 0.50) of craniofacial pattern profile (CFPP) similarity between sibs and between sibs and their mother. This strongly suggests that the two sibs and their mothers are the carrier of the same genetic syndrome.     

The use of dysmorphology in birth defects epidemiology.

Most human teratogens have been identified by the clinical recognition of characteristic patterns of congenital anomalies among children whose mothers were exposed to a particular agent during pregnancy. Although this dysmorphologic method has been valuable, it is criticized because it is not easily amenable to statistical evaluation. Conventional birth defects epidemiological studies are designed to permit rigorous statistical assessment, but such investigations usually classify congenital anomalies without adequate consideration of their known etiological heterogeneity. It is possible to combine the best aspects of these two approaches to identifying human teratogens in a "dysmorphologic case/control study." Instead of including all available cases with a given defect, only individuals having the anomaly in the context of a multiple congenital anomaly pattern without a recognizable cause would be selected for inclusion among the case group. The frequency of exposure to the putative teratogen would be determined among these selected cases and among appropriately chosen controls; conventional statistical analysis would then be performed. Although this design reduces the size of the case group compared to a conventional case/control study, the statistical power is unchanged or increased. In addition, biological plausibility is increased by concentrating upon a group of cases that is more likely to have a teratogenic cause.