Does the first LH surge of the breeding season initiate the first full-length cycle in the ewe?

To determine whether the first LH surge of the breeding season initiates a transient rise in progesterone in most ewes, serum progesterone (daily) and LH (every 4 h) concentrations were measured in samples collected from 7 ewes between 19 July and first oestrus or 8 September, whichever came first. In 6 of the 7 ewes, the first LH surge of the breeding season was followed within 5 days by a transient, 2-day rise in progesterone. Within less than 5 (N = 4), or 9 (N = 1) or 10 (N = 1) days later, a second LH surge occurred, which was similar in maximum amplitude and duration to the first surge, and which initiated the first full-length luteal phase of the breeding season. In the remaining ewe, the first LH surge of the breeding season induced an abbreviated (9 days) and insufficient (maximum progesterone, 0.94 ng/ml) luteal phase. These results demonstrate that most ewes have more than one LH surge before the first full-length luteal phase, the first surge inducing a transient rise in progesterone. Therefore, although the seasonal decrease in response to oestradiol negative feedback is sufficient for initiation of the first LH surge of the breeding season, additional endocrine mechanisms may be necessary to induce the first full-length luteal phase.     

Does the seasonal increase in estradiol negative feedback prevent luteinizing hormone surges in anestrous ewes by suppressing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency?

To test the hypothesis that the anestrous increase in estradiol negative feedback prevents estrous cycles by suppressing hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency, a variety of regimens of increasing GnRH pulse frequency were administered to anestrous ewes for 3 days. A luteinizing hormone (LH) surge was induced in 45 of 46 ewes regardless of amplitude or frequency of GnRH pulses, but only 19 had luteal phases. Estradiol administration induced LH surges in 6 of 6 ewes, only 3 having luteal phases. Anestrous luteal phase progesterone profiles were similar in incidence, time course, and amplitude to those of the first luteal phases of the breeding season, which in turn had lower progesterone maxima than late breeding season luteal phases. In the remaining ewes, progesterone increased briefly or not at all, the increases being similar to the transient rises in progesterone occurring in most ewes at the onset of the breeding season. These results demonstrate that increasing GnRH pulse frequency induces LH surges in anestrus and that the subsequent events are similar to those at the beginning of the breeding season. Finally, they support the hypothesis that the negative feedback action of estradiol prevents cycles in anestrus by suppressing the frequency of the hypothalamic pulse generator.     

Effects of an opioid antagonist on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the ewe vary with changes in steroid negative feedback

In ewes during the breeding season, estradiol (E) and progesterone (P) synergistically regulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. E primarily inhibits LH pulse amplitude and P inhibits LH pulse frequency. To determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) mediate these negative feedback effects, we administered the long-acting opioid antagonist WIN 44,441-3 (WIN) to intact ewes during the luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle and to ovariectomized ewes treated with no steroids, E, P, or E plus P. Steroid levels were maintained at levels seen during the estrous cycle by Silastic implants placed shortly after surgery. WIN increased LH pulse frequency, but not amplitude, in luteal phase ewes. In contrast, during the follicular phase, LH pulse amplitude was increased by WIN and pulse frequency was unchanged. Neither LH pulse frequency nor pulse amplitude was affected by WIN in long-term ovariectomized ewes untreated with steroids. In contrast, WIN slightly increased LH pulse frequency in short-term ovariectomized ewes. WIN also increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes treated with P or E plus P. WIN did not affect pulse frequency but did increase LH pulse amplitude in E-treated ewes. These results support the hypothesis that EOP participate in the negative feedback effects of E and P on pulsatile LH secretion during the breeding season and that the inhibitory effects of EOP may persist for some time after ovariectomy.     

Seasonal changes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in the ewe.

A sustained volley of high-frequency pulses of GnRH secretion is a fundamental step in the sequence of neuroendocrine events leading to ovulation during the breeding season of sheep. In the present study, the pattern of GnRH secretion into pituitary portal blood was examined in ewes during both the breeding and anestrous seasons, with a focus on determining whether the absence of ovulation during the nonbreeding season is associated with the lack of a sustained increase in pulsatile GnRH release. During the breeding season, separate groups (n = 5) of ovary-intact ewes were sampled during the midluteal phase of the estrous cycle and following the withdrawal of progesterone (removal of progesterone implants) to synchronize onset of the follicular phase. During the nonbreeding season, another two groups (n = 5) were sampled either in the absence of hormonal treatments or following withdrawal of progesterone. Pituitary portal and jugular blood for measurement of GnRH and LH, respectively, were sampled every 10 min for 6 h during the breeding season or for 12 h in anestrus. During the breeding season, mean frequency of episodic GnRH release was 1.4 pulses/6 h in luteal-phase ewes; frequency increased to 7.8 pulses/6 h during the follicular phase (following progesterone withdrawal). In marked contrast, GnRH pulse frequency was low (mean less than 1 pulse/6 h) in both groups of anestrous ewes (untreated and following progesterone withdrawal), but GnRH pulse amplitude exceeded that in both luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The introduction of rams induces an increase in pulsatile LH secretion in cyclic ewes during the breeding season

Application of the ram effect during the breeding season has been previously disregarded because the ewe reproductive axis is powerfully inhibited by luteal phase progesterone concentrations. However, anovulatory ewes treated with exogenous progestagens respond to ram introduction with an increase in LH concentrations. We therefore tested whether cyclic ewes would respond to ram introduction with an increase in pulsatile LH secretion at all stages of the estrous cycle. We did two experiments using genotypes native to temperate or Mediterranean regions. In Experiment 1 (UK), 12 randomly cycling, North of England Mule ewes were introduced to rams midway through a frequent blood-sampling regime. Ewes in the early (EL; n=3) [corrected] and late luteal (LL; n=6) phase responded to ram introduction with an increase in LH pulse frequency and mean and basal concentration [corrected] of LH (at least P<0.05). In Experiment 2 (Australia), the cycles of 32 Merino ewes were synchronised using intravaginal progestagen pessaries. Pessary insertion was staggered to produce eight ewes at each stage of the estrous cycle: follicular (F), early luteal (EL), mid-luteal (ML) and late luteal (LL). In all stages of the cycle, ewes responded to ram introduction with an increase in LH pulse frequency (P<0.01); EL, ML and LL ewes also had an increase in mean LH concentration (P<0.05). In conclusion, ram introduction to cyclic ewes stimulated an increase in pulsatile LH secretion, independent of ewe genotype or stage of the estrous cycle.     

Ovarian function in ewes at the onset of the breeding season

Transrectal ultrasonography of ovaries was performed each day, during the expected transition from anoestrus to the breeding season (mid-August to early October), in six Western white-faced cross-bred ewes, to record ovarian antral follicles > or = 3 mm in size and luteal structures. Jugular blood samples were collected daily for radioimmunoassay (RIA) of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), oestradiol and progesterone. The first ovulation of the breeding season was followed by the full-length oestrous cycle in all ewes studied. Prior to the ovulation, all ewes exhibited a distinct increase in circulating concentrations of progesterone, yet no corpora lutea (CL) were detected and luteinized unovulated follicles were detected in only three ewes. Secretion of FSH was not affected by the cessation of anoestrus and peaks of episodic FSH fluctuations were associated with the emergence of ovarian follicular waves (follicles growing from 3 to > or = 5 mm). During the 17 days prior to the first ovulation of the breeding season, there were no apparent changes in the pattern of emergence of follicular waves. Mean daily numbers of small antral follicles (not growing beyond 3 mm in diameter) declined (P < 0.05) after the first ovulation. The ovulation rate, maximal total and mean luteal volumes and maximal serum progesterone concentrations, but not mean diameters of ovulatory follicles, were ostensibly lower during the first oestrous cycle of the breeding season compared with the mid-breeding season of Western white-faced ewes. Oestradiol secretion by ovarian follicles appeared to be fully restored, compared with anoestrous ewes, but it was not synchronized with the growth of the largest antral follicles of waves until after the beginning of the first oestrous cycle. An increase in progesterone secretion preceding the first ovulation of the breeding season does not result, as previously suggested, from the ovulation of immature ovarian follicles and short-lived CL, but progesterone may be produced by luteinized unovulated follicles and/or interstitial tissue of unknown origin. This increase in serum concentrations of progesterone does not alter the pattern of follicular wave development, hence it seems to be important mainly for inducing oestrous behaviour, synchronizing it with the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH), and preventing premature luteolysis during the ensuing luteal phase. Progesterone may also enhance ovarian follicular responsiveness to circulating gonadotropins through a local mechanism.     

Luteinizing hormone, oestrogen and progesterone levels in peripheral serum of anoestrous and cyclic ewes as determined by radioimmunoassay.

Jugular vein blood was collected daily from four mature ewes throughout anoestrus and the first oestrous cycle of the breeding season until 4 days after the second oestrus. The levels of oestrogen, progesterone and LH were determined by radioimmunoassay. There were fluctuations in the LH level throughout most of the observed anoestrous period with a mean plus or minus S.E. value of 2-3 plus or minus 0-9 ng/ml. High LH values of 20-0, 41-2 and 137-5 ng/ml were observed in three ewes on Day - 24 of anoestrus. A brief minor rise in progesterone level was also observed around this period. Progesterone levels were consistently low (0.11 plus or minus 0-01 ng/ml) before Day - 25 of anoestrus. A major rise occurred on Day - 12 of anoestrous and this was followed by patterns similar to those that have been previously reported for the oestrous cycle of the ewe. Random fluctuations of oestrogens deviating from a mean level of 4-40 plus or minus 0-1 pg/ml were observed during anoestrus and the mean level during the period from the first to the second oestrus was 5-2 plus or minus 0-3 pg/ml. A well-defined peak of 13-3 plus or minus 0-7 pg/ml was seen in all ewes on the day of the second oestrus. Results of the present study suggest that episodic releases of LH occur during anoestrus and periods of low luteal activity. The fluctuations in LH levels, as observed during the period of low luteal activity, i.e. before Day - 25 of anoestrus, were less pronounced during the periods of high luteal activity. The view that luteal activity precedes the first behavioural oestrus of the breeding season is supported.     

Changes in pulsatile LH secretion after ovariectomy in Ile-de-France ewes in two seasons

Two experiments were conducted in Ile-de-France ewes to study changes in pulsatile LH secretion in ewes ovariectomized during anoestrus or during the midluteal phase of the oestrous cycle. In Exp. 1, blood samples were taken every 20 min for 12 h the day before ovariectomy (Day 0). After ovariectomy, samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group), on Days 1, 3, 7 and 15. In Exp. 2 samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h (10 ewes per group) on Days 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 after ovariectomy. Further samples were taken (5 ewes per group) at 9 and 12 months after ovariectomy. There were significant interactions between season and day of sampling for the interval between LH pulses in both experiments. LH pulse frequency increased within 1 day of ovariectomy and the increase was more rapid during the breeding season. There were clear seasonal differences in pulse frequency in Exp. 2. Compared with ewes ovariectomized in anoestrus, pulse frequency was significantly higher for ewes ovariectomized in the breeding season, from Day 7 until Day 120. Once pulse frequency had increased in ewes about the time of the normal breeding season, pulse frequency remained high and subsequent seasonal changes were greatly reduced. Pulse amplitude increased immediately after ovariectomy to reach a maximum on Day 7 and there were no differences between season of ovariectomy in the initial changes in amplitude. In Exp. 2, changes in amplitude followed changes in pulse interval and there was a significant interaction between season and day of sampling. There were no significant effects of season on nadir LH concentrations which increased throughout the duration of the experiments. These results show that, in ovariectomized ewes, LH pulse frequency observed on a given day depends on time after ovariectomy, season at the time of sampling and on previous exposure of ewes to stimulatory effects of season. The direct effects of season on LH pulse frequency and seasonal changes in sensitivity to steroid feedback may contribute to control of the breeding season and their relative contributions to the beginning and end of the breeding season may differ.     

Effects of pentobarbital anesthesia on tonic luteinizing hormone secretion in the ewe: evidence for active inhibition of luteinizing hormone in anestrus

In the ewe, seasonal anestrus appears to result from two effects of inhibitory photoperiod: 1) estradiol gains the capacity to suppress luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency and hence becomes a potent inhibitor of tonic LH secretion and 2) a steroid-independent decrease in LH pulse frequency occurs in ovariectomized ewes. In this study, we have obtained evidence, using pentobarbital anesthesia, that both these actions of photoperiod reflect the activation, in anestrus, of an inhibitory neural system. Administration of pentobarbital to intact anestrous ewes produced a dramatic, 3-fold increase in LH pulse frequency during the 6 h of anesthesia. In contrast, during the breeding season, pentobarbital inhibited LH pulse frequency in luteal phase animals. There was also a seasonal variation in the effects of pentobarbital in ovariectomized ewes. During the breeding season this drug again suppressed LH secretion, inhibiting both LH pulse amplitude and frequency. In anestrus, pentobarbital also suppressed pulse amplitude, but it produced a transitory increase (lasting 3 h) in pulse frequency. To account for the stimulatory actions of pentobarbital, we propose that in anestrus, but not the breeding season, LH pulse frequency is held in check by a set of estradiol-sensitive inhibitory neurons. Further, we suggest that these neurons are activated by inhibitory photoperiod and account for both the steroid-dependent and steroid-independent actions of photoperiod.     

Effect of transport on pulsatile LH release in ovariectomized ewes with or without prior steroid exposure at different times of year

The initial aim of the present study was to test whether the stress of transport suppresses LH pulsatile secretion in ewes. In a pilot experiment in the late breeding season, transport resulted in an unexpected response in three out of five transported, ovariectomized ewes pretreated with oestradiol and progesterone. Before transport, seasonal suppression of LH pulses had occurred earlier than anticipated, but LH pulsatility suddenly restarted for the period of transport. This finding was reminiscent of unexplained results obtained in ovariectomized ewes infused centrally with high doses of corticotrophin-releasing hormone after pretreatment with low doses of oestradiol with or without progesterone. Hence, an additional aim of the present study was to examine whether these latter results with corticotrophin-releasing hormone could be reproduced by increasing endogenous corticotrophin-releasing hormone secretion by transport. Subsequent experiments used groups of at least eight ovariectomized ewes at different times of the year with or without prior exposure to steroids to assess whether these unexpected observations were associated with season or the prevailing endocrine milieu. In the mid-breeding season, transport for 4 h in the absence of steroid pretreatment for 8 months reduced LH pulse frequency from 7.5 +/- 0.3 to 6.3 +/- 0.4 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) and LH pulse amplitude from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.3 ng ml-1 (P < 0.05). Similarly, in the mid-breeding season, 34 h after the cessation of pretreatment with oestradiol and progesterone, transport suppressed LH pulse frequency from 6.1 +/- 0.4 to 5.5 +/- 0.3 pulses per 4 h (P < 0.05) with a tendency of effect on amplitude (6.2 +/- 2.7 to 2.61 +/- 0.6 ng ml-1; P = 0.07; note the large variance in the pretransport data). During mid-anoestrus, evidence of a suppressive effect of transport was only observed on LH pulse amplitude (4.7 +/- 0.6 versus 3.0 +/- 0.5 pulses per 4 h; P < 0.05) in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to ovarian steroids for 4 months. Repetition of the pilot experiment with 12 ewes during the transition into anoestrus resulted in one ewe with LH pulses seasonally suppressed but increased by transport; 11 ewes had a distinct pulsatile LH pattern which was decreased by transport in six ewes. In anoestrus, there was no effect of transport on LH pulse frequency or amplitude in intact ewes, or those ovariectomized 2-3 weeks previously, with or without prior oestradiol and progesterone treatment. However, basal concentrations of cortisol were greater in anoestrus than in the breeding season, and the increment in cortisol during transport was similar in anoestrus and the breeding season but greater during the transition into anoestrus (P < 0.05). Progesterone concentrations increased from 0.31 +/- 0.02 ng ml-1 before transport to 0.48 +/- 0.05 ng ml-1 during the second hour of transport (P < 0.05). In conclusion, transport reduced LH pulse frequency and amplitude in ovariectomized ewes that had not been exposed to exogenous steroids for at least 4 months. In most animals, the previously observed increase in LH pulsatility induced by exogenous CRH was not reproduced by increasing endogenous CRH secretion by transport. However, in four ewes, transport did increase LH pulsatility, but only during the transition into anoestrus in ewes with seasonally suppressed LH profiles after withdrawal of steroid pretreatment.     

First postpartum ovulations and corpora lutea in ewes which lamb in the breeding season

Two experiments involving crossbred ewes which lambed during the breeding season were performed to determine whether: (a) the interval to first postpartum ovulation could be reduced by weaning or mastectomy; (b) there are differences in luteal structure and luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor concentration between first postpartum corpora lutea induced with GnRH and normal cycling corpora lutea and (c) pretreatment of postpartum ewes with progesterone would affect luteal LH receptor concentration and luteal phase serum progesterone concentration.In experiment I, the mean interval (±SEM) to the first postpartum ovulation was 22.3 ± 1.1 days and was not significantly altered by weaning or mastectomy. More than half of the ewes had small, short-lived peaks of serum progesterone associated with short-lived corpora lutea prior to the normal luteal phase rise of serum progesterone. In experiment II, 2 h after GnRH injection on day 18 postpartum, serum LH concentrations were higher in ewes which received progesterone treatment on days 13 and 14 than in control ewes. Progesterone treatment did not affect mean corpus luteum weight (157 mg) or concentration of LH receptors (0.95 fmol/mg) in first postpartum corpora lutea, but progesterone-treated ewes had significantly higher endogenous serum progesterone concentrations on days 21–24. GnRH-induced corpora lutea from postpartum ewes were lighter in weight, paler in color, had lower LH receptor concentrations and had a more regressed histological appearance than corpora lutea of a similar age from normal, cycling ewes.     

Effect of luteinizing hormone (LH), pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB), or arachidonic acid (AA) on secretion of progesterone and prostaglandins (PG) E (PGE; PGE(1) and PGE(2)) and F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) by ovine corpora lutea of the estrous cycle or pregnancy in vitro

LH regulates luteal progesterone secretion during the estrous cycle in ewes and cows. However, PGE, not LH, stimulated ovine luteal progesterone secretion in vitro at day 90 of pregnancy and at day 200 in cows. The hypophysis is not obligatory after day 50 nor the ovaries after day 55 to maintain pregnancy in ewes. LH has been reported to regulate ovine placental PGE secretion up to day 50 of pregnancy and by pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB) after day 50 of pregnancy. The objective of this experiment was to determine if and when a switch from LH to PGE occurred as the luteotropin regulating luteal progesterone secretion during pregnancy in ewes. Ovine luteal tissue slices of the estrous cycle (days 8, 11, 13, and 15) or pregnancy (days 8, 11, 13, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 90) were incubated in vitro with vehicle, LH, AA (precursor to PGE(2) and PGF(2alpha) synthesis), or PSPB in M199 for 4 h and 8 h. Concentrations of progesterone in jugular venous plasma of bred ewes increased (P< or =0.05) after day 50 and continued to increase through day 90. Secretion of progesterone by luteal tissue of non-bred ewes on days 8, 11, 13 and 15 and by bred ewes on days 8, 11, 13, 15, 20, 30, 40, and 50 was increased (P< or =0.05) by LH, but not by luteal tissue from pregnant ewes after day 50 (P> or =0.05). LH-stimulated progesterone secretion by luteal tissue from day 15 bred ewes was greater (P< or =0.05) than day 15 luteal tissue from non-bred ewes. Concentrations of progesterone in media were increased (P< or =0.05) when luteal tissue from pregnant ewes on day 50, 60, or 90 were incubated with AA or PSPB. Concentrations of PGE in media of non-bred ewes on days 8, 11, 13, or 15 and bred ewes on days 8 and 11 did not differ (P> or =0.05). Concentrations of PGE were increased (P< or =0.05) in media by luteal slices from bred ewes on days 13, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 90 of vehicle, LH, AA or PSPB-treated ewes. In addition, PSPB increased (P< or =0.05) PGE in media by luteal slices from pregnant ewes only on days 40, 50, 60, and 90. Concentrations of PGF(2alpha) were increased in media (P<0.05) of vehicle, AA, LH, or PSPB-treated luteal tissue from non-bred ewes and bred ewes on day 15 and by luteal tissue from bred ewes on days 20 and 30 after which concentrations of PGF(2alpha) in media declined (P< or =0.05) and did not differ (P> or =0.05) from non-bred or bred ewes on days 8, 11, or 13. It is concluded that LH regulates luteal progesterone secretion during the estrous cycle of non-bred ewes and up to day 50 of pregnancy, while only PGE regulates luteal progresterone secretion by ovine corpora lutea from days 50 to 90 of pregnancy. In addition, PSPB appears to regulate luteal secretion of progesterone from days 50 to 90 of pregnancy through stimulation of PGE secretion by ovine luteal tissue.     

Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in the ewe: relationship of frequency of LH pulses to day length and response to estradiol negative feedback

Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized ewes were examined over the course of 2 yr in relation to annual changes in environmental photoperiod, shifts in response to estradiol negative feedback control of LH secretion, and timing of the breeding season. Under natural environmental conditions, the frequency of LH pulses in individual ovariectomized ewes changed gradually and in close association with the annual cycle of day length. As days became shorter in late summer and autumn, LH pulse frequency increased; conversely, as day length increased in late winter and spring, frequency declined. Under artificial conditions in which ovariectomized ewes were exposed to different photoperiods, a similar inverse relationship was observed between day length and LH pulse frequency. The seasonal changes in frequency of LH pulses in ovariectomized ewes, although symmetric with the annual photoperiodic cycle, were not temporally coupled to the dramatic shifts in response to estradiol feedback inhibition of LH secretion at the transitions between breeding season and anestrus. The feedback shifts occurred abruptly and at times when LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes was at, or near, the annual maximum or minimum. The tight coupling between LH pulse frequency and photoperiod leads to the conclusion that there is a photoperiodic drive to the LH pulse-generating system of the ewe. The temporal dissociation between changes in this photoperiodic drive and the seasonal shifts in response to estradiol negative feedback support the hypothesis that the neuroendocrine basis for these two phenomena is not one and the same.     

Differential regulation of gonadotropin subunit messenger ribonucleic acids by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in ewes

Changes in the frequency of GnRH and LH pulses have been shown to occur between the luteal and preovulatory periods in the ovine estrous cycle. We examined the effect of these different frequencies of GnRH pulses on pituitary concentrations of LH and FSH subunit mRNAs. Eighteen ovariectomized ewes were implanted with progesterone to eliminate endogenous GnRH release during the nonbreeding season. These animals then received 3 ng/kg body weight GnRH in frequencies of once every 4, 1, or 0.5 h for 4 days. These frequencies represent those observed during the luteal and follicular phases, and the preovulatory LH and FSH surge of the ovine estrous cycle, respectively. On day 4, the ewes were killed and their anterior pituitary glands were removed for measurements of pituitary LH, FSH, and their subunit mRNAs. Pituitary content of LH and FSH, as assessed by RIA, did not change (P greater than 0.10) in response to the three different GnRH pulse frequencies. However, subunit mRNA concentrations, assessed by solution hybridization assays and expressed as femtomoles per mg total RNA, did change as a result of different GnRH frequencies. alpha mRNA concentrations were higher (P less than 0.05) when the GnRH pulse frequency was 1/0.5 h and 1 h, whereas LH beta and FSH beta mRNA concentrations were maximal (P less than 0.05) only at a pulse frequency of 1/h. Additionally, pituitary LH and FSH secretory response to GnRH on day 4 was maximal (P = 0.05) when the pulse infusion was 1/h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Early pituitary LH response to injections of GnRH in ewes

In the deep anoestrous period (June), five intact ewes and five ovariectomized ewes received 50 ug synthetic gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In the mid-breeding season (October), the GnRH administrations were repeated in five intact and four ovariectomized ewes; the former were in the luteal phase of the cycle. Blood samples were collected every 30 sec for 15 min, then at 15-min intervals. Release of luteinizing hormone (LH) occurred as soon as the second minute after injection in all ewes. This early response was earlier and more abrupt in the ovariectomized ewes than in the intact animals. In a second experiment three intact ewes that were in deep anoestrus received 50 ug GnRH followed 5 h 20 min later by a second identical injection. Another three intact ewes in deep anoestrus received two injections of 1 ug GnRH. Blood samples were taken every 15 sec for 15 min, then every 20 min until the next injection, and for a further 5 h after the second injection. This regimen was repeated in mid-breeding season during the luteal phase. There was again a very early release of LH; the magnitude of response was similar after the first injection of either 50 ug or 1 ug GnRH to intact ewes either in the breeding season or during deep anoestrus. However, a greater early release of LH was obtained at the lower dose only after the second injection of GnRH. Apart from this exception, the similar early release of LH occurred in spite of different amounts of LH released thereafter in response to the two doses of GnRH. It is suggested that the early response to GnRH consists of LH stored in a "readily releasable" pool in the pituitary, whereas the main release of LH may be a result of increased synthesis and/or release of a more stable pool.     

Oestradiol and the preovulatory surges of luteinising hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in ewes during the breeding season and transition into anoestrus

This study was designed to see if giving exogenous oestradiol, during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle of intact ewes, during the breeding season or transition into anoestrus, would alter the occurrence, timing or magnitude of the preovulatory surge of secretion of luteinising hormone (LH) or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). During the breeding season and the time of transition, separate groups of ewes were infused (intravenously) with either saline (30 ml h⁻¹; n = 6) or oestradiol in saline (n = 6) for 30 h. Infusion started 12 h after removal of progestin-containing intravaginal sponges that had been in place for 12 days. The initial dose of oestradiol was 0.02 μg h⁻¹; this was doubled every 4 h for 20 h, followed by every 5 h up to 30 h, to reach a maximum of 1.5 μg h⁻¹. Following progestin removal during the breeding season, peak serum concentrations of oestradiol in control ewes were 10.31 ± 1.04 pg ml⁻¹, at 49.60 ± 3.40 h after progestin removal. There was no obvious peak during transition, but at a time after progestin removal equivalent to the time of the oestradiol peak in ewes at mid breeding season, oestradiol concentrations were 6.70 ± 1.14 pg ml⁻¹ in ewes in transition (P < 0.05). In oestradiol treated ewes, peak serum oestradiol concentrations (24.8 ± 2.1 pg ml⁻¹) and time to peak (41.00 ± 0.05 h) did not differ between seasons (P > 0.05). During the breeding season, all six control ewes and four of six ewes given oestradiol showed oestrus with LH and FSH surges. The two ewes not showing oestrus did not respond to oestrus synchronisation and had persistently high serum concentrations of progesterone. During transition, three of six control ewes showed oestrus but only two had LH and FSH surges; all oestradiol treated ewes showed oestrus and gonadotrophin surges (P < 0.05). The timing and magnitude of LH and FSH surges did not vary with treatment or season. In blood samples collected every 12 min for 6 h, from 12 h after the start of oestradiol infusion, mean serum concentrations of LH and LH pulse frequency were lower in control ewes during transition than during mid breeding season (P < 0.05). Oestradiol treatment resulted in lower mean serum concentrations of LH in season and lower LH pulse frequency in transition (P < 0.05). We concluded that enhancing the height of the preovulatory peak in serum concentrations of oestradiol during the breeding season did not alter the timing or the magnitude of the preovulatory surge of LH and FSH secretion and that at transition into anoestrus, oestradiol can induce oestrus and the surge release of LH and FSH as effectively as during the breeding season.     

Effects of luteinizing hormone on luteal cell populations in hypophysectomized ewes

To examine the effect of purified LH on development and function of luteal cells, 27 ewes were assigned to: (1) hypophysectomy plus 2 micrograms ovine LH given i.v. at 4-h intervals from Days 5 to 12 of the oestrous cycle (oestrus = Day 0; Group H + LH; N = 7); (2) hypophysectomy with no LH replacement (Group N-LH; N = 6); (3) control (no hypophysectomy) plus LH replacement as in Group H + LH (Group S + LH; N = 7); (4) control with no LH treatment (Group S-LH; N = 7). Blood samples were collected at 4-h intervals throughout the experiment to monitor circulating concentrations of LH, cortisol and progesterone. On Day 12 of the oestrous cycle corpora lutea were collected and luteal progesterone concentrations, unoccupied receptors for LH and number and sizes of steroidogenic and non-steroidogenic luteal cell types were determined. Corpora lutea from ewes in Group H-LH were significantly smaller (P less than 0.05), had lower concentrations of progesterone, fewer LH receptors, fewer small luteal cells and fewer non-steroidogenic cells than did corpora lutea from ewes in Group S-LH. The number of large luteal cells was unaffected by hypophysectomy, but the sizes of large luteal cells, small luteal cells and fibroblasts were reduced. LH replacement in hypophysectomized ewes maintained luteal weight and the numbers of small steroidogenic and non-steroidogenic luteal cells at levels intermediate between those observed in ewes in Groups L-LH and S-LH. In Group H + LH ewes, luteal and serum concentrations of progesterone, numbers of luteal receptors for LH, and the sizes of all types of luteal cells were maintained. Numbers of small steroidogenic and non-steroidogenic cells were also increased by LH in hypophysectomized ewes. In Exp. II, 14 ewes were assigned to: (1) sham hypophysectomy with no LH replacement therapy (Group S-LH; N = 5); (2) sham hypophysectomy with 40 micrograms ovine LH given i.v. at 4-h intervals from Day 5 to Day 12 of the oestrous cycle (Group S + LH; N = 5); and (3) hypophysectomy plus LH replacement therapy (Group H + LH; N = 4). Experimental procedures were similar to those described for Exp. I. Treatment of hypophysectomized ewes with a larger dose of LH maintained luteal weight, serum and luteal progesterone concentrations and the numbers of steroidogenic and non-steroidogenic luteal cells at control levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Effects of time after ovariectomy, season and oestradiol on luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in ovariectomized ewes.

During the breeding season, five groups of three ewes were implanted at ovariectomy with 0.36, 0.5, 1.0 and 6.0 cm oestradiol implants or implants containing no steroid. Eleven days after receiving implants, blood samples were taken every 10 min for 6 h; implants were then removed. Treatments were repeated three times during each of two consecutive breeding seasons and four times during the intervening anoestrus. In ovariectomized ewes without steroid treatment, luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency increased from early to mid-breeding season, decreased to a minimum at mid-anoestrus and increased to reach a maximum at the mid-point of the second breeding season, subsequently declining. LH pulse amplitude was inversely related to frequency. Basal serum LH concentrations decreased gradually from the first breeding season to reach a minimum at mid-anoestrus and gradually increased to reach a maximum at the end of the second breeding season. Mean serum LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were higher at the end of the second breeding season compared with the beginning of the first breeding season. All parameters of gonadotrophin secretion were decreased much more by oestradiol during the anoestrus than during the breeding season. LH pulse frequency was decreased during anoestrus and at high oestradiol concentrations during the first breeding season. Apart from LH pulse amplitude, the decreases in all parameters of gonadotrophin secretion were less during the second compared with the first breeding season. The minimum effective dose of oestradiol required to decrease mean and basal serum concentrations of LH during anoestrus was lower than in the breeding season. The minimum effective dose of oestradiol required to decrease mean serum concentrations of FSH was lower in the first compared with the second breeding season. Oestradiol depression of LH pulse amplitude and mean serum concentrations of LH and FSH showed a dose dependency during the breeding season. During anoestrus dose dependency was seen for basal concentrations of LH and mean serum concentrations of LH and FSH. We conclude that significant chronic changes in gonadotrophin secretion occur in the ewe with time after ovariectomy. Sensitivity to oestradiol also changes, and the effects of oestradiol are not always dose dependent. We suggest that the circannual pattern of LH pulse frequency and basal LH secretion are directly linked to the circannual cycle of photoperiod.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Effect of oxytocin infusion on secretion of progesterone and luteinizing hormone and the concentration of uterine oxytocin receptors during the periovulatory period in cloprostenol-treated ewes.

Oxytocin infusions were initiated on day 10 of the oestrous cycle in ewes, and luteal regression was induced by injection of 100 micrograms cloprostenol on day 12. Blood samples were collected at frequent intervals via an indwelling jugular vein cannula to measure concentrations of progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) during the luteal and follicular phases in saline (n = 6) and oxytocin (n = 5) infused animals. The oxytocin infusion maintained peripheral plasma concentrations of 53 +/- 3.2 pg oxytocin ml-1 (mean +/- SEM) compared with values of about 1 pg ml-1 during oestrus in control ewes. Oxytocin infusion had no effect on luteal phase progesterone concentrations, the timing of luteolysis, basal luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, LH pulse frequency, or the timing or height of the LH surge. Treated ewes came into oestrus significantly earlier than controls (P < 0.05) but ovulated normally. Uterine samples collected 96 h after cloprostenol injection (approximately day 2 of the cycle) showed that oxytocin receptor concentrations were significantly higher in the endometrium in ewes that had been given a 5 day oxytocin infusion than in control animals (556 and 262 fmol mg-1 protein, respectively: geometric means from ANOVA, P < 0.001), whereas myometrial receptor concentrations were not affected (113 and 162 fmol mg-1 protein, respectively). We conclude that the previously reported delay in luteal development caused by oxytocin infusion (Wathes et al., 1991) is not due to the inhibition or delay of ovulation, but must instead occur via a direct influence on the developing corpus luteum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Changing frequency of pulsatile luteinizing hormone and progesterone secretion during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of rhesus monkeys

Experiments were conducted to examine the pulsatile nature of biologically active luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone secretion during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in rhesus monkeys. As the luteal phase progressed, the pulse frequency of LH release decreased dramatically from a high of one pulse every 90 min during the early luteal phase to a low of one pulse every 7-8 h during the late luteal phase. As the pulse frequency decreased, there was a corresponding increase in pulse amplitude. During the early luteal phase, progesterone secretion was not episodic and there were increments in LH that were not associated with elevations in progesterone. However, during the mid-late luteal phase, progesterone was secreted in a pulsatile fashion. During the midluteal phase (Days 6-7 post-LH surge), 67% of the LH pulses were associated with progesterone pulses, and by the late luteal phase (Days 10-11 post-LH surge), every LH pulse was accompanied by a dramatic and sustained release of progesterone. During the late luteal phase, when the LH profile was characterized by low-frequency, high-amplitude pulses, progesterone levels often rose from less than 1 ng/ml to greater than 9 ng/ml and returned to baseline within a 3-h period. Thus, a single daily progesterone determination is unlikely to be an accurate indicator of luteal function. These results suggest that the changing pattern of mean LH concentrations during the luteal phase occurs as a result of changes in frequency and amplitude of LH release. These changes in the pulsatile pattern of LH secretion appear to have profound effects on secretion of progesterone by the corpus luteum, especially during the mid-late luteal phase when the patterns of LH concentrations are correlated with those of progesterone.