Initial limb budding is independent of apical ectodermal ridge activity; evidence from a limbless mutant

Outgrowth of normal chick limb bud mesoderm is dependent on the presence of a specialized epithelium called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ectodermal ridge is induced by the mesoderm at about the time of limb bud formation. The limbless mutation in the chick affects apical ectodermal ridge formation in the limb buds of homozygotes. The initial formation of the limb bud appears to be unaffected by the mutation but no ridge develops and further outgrowth, which is normally dependent on the ridge, does not take place. As a result, limbless chicks develop without limbs. In the present study, which utilized a pre-limb-bud recombinant technique, limbless mesoderm induced an apical ectodermal ridge in grafted normal flank ectoderm. However, at stages when normal flank ectoderm is capable of responding to ridge induction, limbless flank ectoderm did not form a ridge or promote outgrowth of a limb in response to normal presumptive wing bud mesoderm. We conclude from this that the limbless mutation affects the ability of the ectoderm to form a ridge. In addition, because the limbless ectoderm has no morphological ridge and no apparent ridge activity (i.e. it does not stabilize limb elements in stage-18 limb bud mesoderm), the limbless mutant demonstrates that the initial formation of the limb bud is independent of apical ectodermal ridge activity.     

Inductive activity and enduring cellular constitution of a supernumerary apical ectodermal ridge grafted to the limb bud of the chick embryo.

Apical ectodermal ridges (AERs) isolated from 3- to 4-day chick and quail embryos were prepared by means of trypsinization and microdissection and then were grafted to the dorsal or ventral side of a host chick wing bud. They induced supernumerary limb outgrowths from the host bud showing, respectively, a bidorsal or biventral organization, as determined by the patterns of feather germs. The grafted ridge cells persisted, as revealed by histological sections of supernumerary chick limb parts growing under the influence of quail AERs, whose cells are readily distinguished after application of the Feulgen reagent.These results show that the AER induces limb outgrowth regardless of whether it is associated with dorsal or ventral limb ectoderm and that its continued existence is not dependent on contributions of ectodermal cells from the opposed ectodermal faces of the limb bud. The AER is pictured as maintaining the subjacent mesoderm in a condition of developmental plasticity without specifying its differentiation with respect to the proximodistal axis. It remains uncertain whether the positional values of cells that develop under the influence of the AER arise within these cells themselves or appear in response to influences from proximal sources.     

Formation of supernumerary structures by the embryonic chick wing depends on the position and orientation of a graft in a host limb bud

The relationship between the position transplanted in a host limb bud, the orientation of a graft in a host limb bud, and the extra limb structures formed was studied by juxtaposing normally nonadjacent embryonic chick wing bud tissue. In one series of transplantation operations, two different wedges (ectoderm and mesoderm) of stage 21 right donor posterior wing bud tissue were transplanted to the middle of a host stage 20 to 22 right wing bud such that the dorsal-ventral polarity of the graft and host were the same or reversed. The results of these transplantation operations show that the formation of supernumerary limb structures depends on the position of origin of the donor tissue, the anterior-posterior position transplanted in a host limb bud, and the orientation of the graft in the host limb bud. In a second series of transplantation operations, the relationship between the proximodistal position where posterior donor tissue is transplanted in an anterior host site and the extra structures formed was studied. A wedge of posterior stage 21 right wing bud tissue was transplanted to an anterior proximal or anterior distal site of a stage 22 to 24 host right wing bud. The results of these transplantation operations show that when the donor tissue is transplanted to an anterior proximal position in a host wing bud, then limbs with only a duplicated humerus result, whereas, when transplanted to an anterior distal position, then limbs with a duplicated forearm element and extra digits result.     

Role of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-4.6 and GHox-8 in the specification of positional identities during the development of normal and polydactylous chick limb buds.

During early stages of normal chick limb development, the homeobox-containing (HOX) gene GHox-4.6 is expressed throughout the posterior mesoderm of the wing bud from which most of the skeletal elements including the digits will develop, whereas GHox-8 is expressed in the anterior limb bud mesoderm which will not give rise to skeletal elements. In the present study, we have examined the expression of GHox-4.6 and GHox-8 in the wing buds of two polydactylous mutant chick embryos, diplopodia-5 and talpid2, from which supernumerary digits develop from anterior limb mesoderm, and have also examined the expression of these genes in response to polarizing zone grafts and retinoic acid-coated bead implants which induce the formation of supernumerary digits from anterior limb mesoderm. We have found that the formation of supernumerary digits from the anterior mesoderm in mutant and experimentally induced polydactylous limb buds is preceded by the ectopic expression of GHox-4.6 in the anterior mesoderm and the coincident suppression of GHox-8 expression in the anterior mesoderm. These observations suggest that the anterior mesoderm of the polydactylous limb buds is "posteriorized" and support the suggestion that GHox-8 and GHox-4.6, respectively, are involved in specifying the anterior non-skeletal and posterior digit-forming regions of the limb bud. Although the anterior mesodermal domain of GHox-8 expression is severely impaired in the mutant and experimentally induced polydactylous limb buds, this gene is expressed by the prolonged, thickened apical ectodermal ridges of the polydactylous limb buds that extend along the distal anterior as well as the distal posterior mesoderm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The in vitro maintenance of the apical ectodermal ridge of the chick embryo wing bud: an assay for polarizing activity.

We have devised an in vitro bioassay for limb bud polarizing activity in the chick embryo. This assay has proven to be a relatively quick and effective test for a morphogenetic factor asymmetrically distributed in the limb bud which is capable of maintaining or thickening the apical ectodermal ridge.A small section of the preaxial border of the chick embryo wing bud was cultured alone, with tissue from the posterior border, mid-dorsal or anterior corner of a second donor wing, or from the flank. The tissue from the preaxial border (responding tissue) consisted of mesoderm with overlying ectoderm and apical ectodermal ridge. When the responding tissue was cultured alone, with flank, or with anterior corner limb tissue, the apical ectodermal ridge flattened in 24–36 hr and many macrophages appeared in the underlying mesoderm. When cultured with posterior border limb tissue however, the apical ridge of the responding tissue remained thickened for up to 48 hr., and no macrophages appear in the underlying mesoderm. The behavior of responding tissue was intermediate between these two extremes when cultured with mid-dorsal limb tissue. The morphogenetic activity assayed by this procedure thus seems to be present as a gradient in the wing bud, with activity decreasing from posterior to anterior. Contact with the responding tissue is not required to enable posterior border tissue to elicit ridge thickening and inhibit the cell death.     

Supernumerary limb structures after juxtaposing dorsal and ventral chick wing bud cells

The formation of duplicated wing skeletal elements and/or extra wing muscles was studied by juxtaposing normally nonadjacent embryonic chick wing bud cells. A wedge of right or left stage 21 wing bud ectoderm and mesoderm was inserted in a slit made in a host stage 20 to 22 right wing bud at the same anteroposterior position as its position of origin. The distal edge of the donor wedge and host wing bud were aligned with each other. Donor tissue was grafted into a host wing bud in one of the following four axial relationships: both the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axes corresponded with each other (aadd); only the anteroposterior axes were opposed (apdd); only the dorsoventral axes were opposed (aadv); both the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axes were opposed (apdv). Of the 63 wings resulting from the control aadd operation and the 45 wings from the apdd operation, only 12 wings had a duplicated skeletal element; of the 69 wings sectioned from these two groups of operations, only one had an extra muscle. However, of the wings resulting from the aadv and apdv operations (48 and 52 cases, respectively), 23 had a duplicated skeletal element; of the 54 wings sectioned from these operations, 43 wings had one to four extra muscles. Furthermore, when the aadv operation was performed with a wedge of donor quail wing bud ectoderm and mesoderm or mesoderm alone, supernumerary muscles formed in these chimeric wings and they were made up of donor quail and host chick cells or only donor quail cells.     

Inductive and axial properties of prospective wing-bud mesoderm in the chick embryo

Prospective wing-bud mesoderm, stripped of ectoderm mechanically through the use of glass needles, or chemically by means of EDTA or trypsin, was obtained from donor embryos of stages 11 through 21. Grafts were made in both homopleural (aadd and apdv) and heteropleural (aadv and apdd) combinations to the right flank of host embryos of the same range of stages. Flank ectoderm from the host healed over the graft in a few hours and, in combinations between donors and hosts in the range of stages 12 through 17, the composite formed, with high frequency, a limb bud capped by an apical ectodermal ridge, and then developed into a supernumerary wing in which all proximodistal levels were represented. When either member of the combination was older than stage 17, only incomplete limbs, if any, were formed. Regardless of their orientation on the host, the supernumerary limbs always showed the axial characteristics appropriate to their side of origin.Supernumerary wings failed to form if the grafts were inserted into a space tunneled between flank ectoderm and its underlying mesoderm. If the covering ectoderm were deliberately torn and forced to heal over the graft, however, an ectodermal ridge formed and a supernumerary limb developed.It is concluded, therefore, that: (1) the wing-bud mesoderm, appropriately combined with flank ectoderm, has the property of morphological and axial self-differentiation by stage 12; (2) the apical ectodermal ridge is induced in flank ectoderm by prospective wing-bud mesoderm; (3) this inductive power is restricted to prospective wing-bud mesoderm from donors of stages 12 through 17; (4) the response competence is limited to flank ectoderm that has healed over the mesoderm; and (5) this competence is lost by the end of stage 17.     

Experimental manipulation leading to induction of dorsal ectodermal ridges on normal limb buds results in a phenocopy of the eudiplopodia chick mutant

Elongation of chick limb buds depends on the presence of the apical ectodermal ridge which is induced by subjacent limb bud mesoderm. Recombination experiments have shown that the limb bud mesoderm loses the capacity to induce ridges by late stage 17. Moreover, in normal limb development only one ridge forms. However, in the eudiplopodia chick mutant accessory ectodermal ridges form on the dorsal surface of limb buds as late as stage 22. Tissue recombinant experiments show that the mutation affects the ectoderm, extending the time it responds to ridge induction (Fraser and Abbott, 1971a, Fraser and Abbott, 1971b while the mesoderm is normal. The result is polydactyly, with extra digits dorsal to the normal digits. Because eudiplopodia limb bud dorsal mesoderm can induce ridges at stage 22 but is unaffected by the gene, genetically normal dorsal limb bud mesoderm may also be able to induce ridges after stage 17. To test this possibility we grafted stages 14–18 flank ectoderm to normal limb bud dorsal mesoderm and found that mesoderm from stages 17 through 20 was able to induce a ridge and subsequently dorsal digits developed. Limbs with duplicate digits were similar to eudiplopodia limbs. In other experiments, stage 18, 19, and 20 leg bud dorsal ectoderm did not form ridges when grafted to leg bud dorsal mesoderm of the same stage, indicating a lack of response to the mesoderm. Finally, the inductive capacity of limb bud mesoderm appeared to be reduced compared to mesoderm at pre-limb bud stages. These experiments demonstrate a spatially generalized potential in limb bud dorsal mesoderm to induce ridges during the stages when the apical ridge is induced. The determination of where the ridge will form and the acquired inability of limb bud dorsal ectoderm to respond to induction by underlying mesoderm are necessary early pattern forming events which assure that a single proximodistal limb axis will form.     

Inhibitory effect on limb morphogenesis by cells of the polarizing zone coaggregated with pre- or postaxial wing bud mesoderm.

The influence of cells of the polarizing zone mesoderm on the morphogenesis of recombinant chick limbs was studied. The recombinant buds were composed of leg bud ectoderm and different regions of the wing bud mesoderm, which had been dissociated and reaggregated. In any case where the polarizing zone mesoderm was coaggregated with the wing mesoderm the morphogenetic capabilities of the recombinant were reduced. This was the case with postaxial mesoderm, preaxial mesoderm plus polarizing tissue, and postaxial mesoderm from which a piece of the nonpolarizing mesoderm (comparable in size to the polarizing zone) had been removed. All of these gave outgrowths with digits in only a very low percentage of cases. In contrast, those recombinants without polarizing mesoderm developed outgrowths with digits in a high percentage of cases, indicating good morphogenesis. Finally, if the polarizing zone were removed prior to dissociation, the recombinant limb, composed of the total remaining wing bud mesoderm plus leg bud ectoderm, exhibited a higher percentage of complete morphogenesis than if the polarizing zone had been part of the recombinant.It is clear that cells of the polarizing zone, when dissociated, and coaggregated with wing mesoderm, are inhibitory to the morphogenetic performance of that mesoderm in the recombinant limb situation.     

Pattern formation in epithelial development: the vertebrate limb and feather bud spacing.

The ectoderm of the vertebrate limb and feather bud are epithelia that provide good models for epithelial patterning in vertebrate development. At the tip of chick and mouse limb buds is a thickening, the apical ectodermal ridge, which is essential for limb bud outgrowth. The signal from the ridge to the underlying mesoderm involves fibroblast growth factors. The non-ridge ectoderm specifies the dorsoventral pattern of the bud and Wnt7a is a dorsalizing signal. The development of the ridge involves an interaction between dorsal cells that express radical fringe and those that do not. There are striking similarities between the signals and genes involved in patterning the limb ectoderm and the epithelia of the Drosophila imaginal disc that gives rise to the wing. The spacing of feather buds involves signals from the epidermis to the underlying mesenchyme, which again include Wnt7a and fibroblast growth factors.     

The ectodermal control of mesodermal patterns of differentiation in the developing chick wing

The influence of limb ectoderm on the dorso-ventral muscle and skeletal patterns in the chick wing was studied by recombining stage 14-21 limb mesoderm with the same stage ectoderm in dorso-ventrally reversed orientation. Recombinants grafted to the flank of host embryos were allowed to develop for 10 days. Fully developed wings obtained from stage 15-21 donor embryos have at their distal half d-v polarity conforming to the reversed ectoderm and proximally polarity conforming with the mesoderm. The ectodermal effect is generally observed as a bidorsal feather pattern at the autopod and an almost complete d-v reversal of muscle and skeletal patterns. In experimental wings from donor embryos younger than stage 15, the dorso-ventral pattern conforms with the polarity of the limb mesoderm. The results suggest that control of dorso-ventral polarity resides in the mesoderm until the onset of limb development at stage 15. At this stage, the ectoderm acquires dorso-ventral information which it can impose on the mesoderm.     

Pattern regulation in the embryonic chick limb: Supernumerary limb formation with anterior (non-ZPA) limb bud tissue

The formation of supernumerary limbs and limb structures was studied by juxtaposing normally nonadjacent embryonic chick limb bud tissue. A “wedge” (ectoderm and mesoderm) of anterior or mid donor right wing bud (stage 21) was inserted in a slit made in a host right limb bud (stage 21) at the same position as its position of origin or to a more posterior position. The AER of the donor tissue and host wing bud were aligned with each other. Donor tissue was grafted with its dorsalventral polarity the same as the host's limb bud or reversed to that of the host's. Depending on the position of origin of the donor limb bud tissue and the position to which it was transplanted in a host, supernumerary wings or wing structures formed. Furthermore, depending on the orientation of the graft in the host, supernumerary limbs with either left or right asymmetry developed. The results of experiments performed here are considered in light of two current models which have been used to describe supernumerary limb formation: one based on local, short-range, cell-cell interactions and the other based on long-range positional signaling via a diffusible morphogen.     

Altered expression of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-7 and GHox-8 in the limb buds of limbless mutant chick embryos.

It has been suggested that the reciprocal expression of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-8 and GHox-7 by the apical ectodermal ridge and subjacent limb mesoderm might be involved in regulating the proximodistal outgrowth of the developing chick limb bud. In the present study the expression of GHox-7 and GHox-8 has been examined by in situ and dot blot hybridization in the developing limb buds of limbless mutant chick embryos. The limb buds of homozygous mutant limbless embryos form at the proper time in development (stage 17/18), but never develop an apical ectodermal ridge, fail to undergo normal elongation, and eventually degenerate. At stage 18, which is shortly following the formation of the limb bud, the expression of GHox-7 is considerably reduced (about 3-fold lower) in the mesoderm of limbless mutant limb buds compared to normal limb bud mesoderm. By stages 20 and 21, as the limb buds of limbless embryos cease outgrowth, GHox-7 expression in limbless mesoderm declines to very low levels, whereas GHox-7 expression increases in the mesoderm of normal limb buds which are undergoing outgrowth. In contrast to GHox-7, expression of GHox-8 in limbless mesoderm at stage 18 is quantitatively similar to its expression in normal limb bud mesoderm, and in limbless and normal mesoderm GHox-8 expression is highly localized in the anterior mesoderm of the limb bud. In normal limb buds, GHox-8 is also expressed in high amounts by the apical ectodermal ridge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Spatial and temporal patterns of cell death in limb bud mesoderm after apical ectodermal ridge removal

A spatiotemporal pattern of cell death occurred in the chick wing and leg bud mesoderm after removal of apical ectodermal ridge at stages 18–20. Cells died in a region extending from the limb bud distal surface to 150–200 μm into the mesoderm. Limb buds from which ridge was removed at later stages in development did not exhibit a spatiotemporal pattern of cell death. In control experiments in which dorsal ectoderm was removed, a pattern of cell death did not occur. Removal of the ridge and part of the 150- to 200-μm zone of prospective cell death resulted in cell death in an area approximately equal to the amount of the zone remaining. After removal of all of the prospective zone of cell death plus the apical ridge, cell death was observed in the remaining limb bud mesoderm. In these limb buds, cell death occurred in a region in which it had not been seen in limb bud with apical ridge alone removed. We conclude that at stages 18–20 the mesodermal cells 150–200 μm beneath the ridge require the apical ridge to survive. More proximal mesodermal cells do not die after ridge removal alone, but apparently require the presence of the more distal mesoderm to survive. Whether this is a requirement for something intrinsic to the distal mesoderm or something it possesses by way of the ridge is unknown. After stage 23, the limb mesoderm cells do not die when the apical ridge is removed. Nevertheless, at the later stages, ridge continues to be required for limb bud proximal-distal elongation and the differentiation of distal limb elements.     

The ability of the chick wing bud to regulate positional disparity along the anterior-posterior axis

When wedges of wing bud tissue are added to a host wing bud so there is positional disparity between graft and host, skeletal duplications result (L. E. Iten and D. J. Murphy 1980) Dev Biol. 75, 373-385. The polarity of the duplications is predictable by the polar coordinate model, leading to the interpretation that the positional disparity caused the duplications. To determine whether positional disparity alone causes duplications, without the complication of added tissue, we rotated wedges of ectoderm and mesoderm around the proximodistal axis within the wing bud. Wedges measuring 200-800 micron along the distal edge were rotated 180 degrees at stages 20-22, reversing the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axes relative to the bud. This caused positional disparity, similar to that achieved by Iten and Murphy (1980), without the addition of tissue. We found that rotations involving no polarizing zone tissue produced normal wings or wings lacking some distal parts, as did rotations of tissue lying entirely within the polarizing zone. However, when polarizing zone mesoderm was displaced, so that polarizing and nonpolarizing tissues were juxtaposed, a majority of the operations produced polarized skeletal duplications. Our data demonstrate that positional disparity alone does not cause skeletal duplications in the chick wing bud, unless polarizing zone tissue is displaced. Further, these data demonstrate that the chick wing bud can regulate to form a normal wing skeleton in the face of large positional disparity, provided that the polarizing zone is not moved. Finally, our results may be explained by the action of the proposed polarizing morphogen on the displaced cells causing repolarization.     

Posterior apical ectodermal ridge removal in the chick wing bud triggers a series of events resulting in defective anterior pattern formation

The ability of the anterior apical ectodermal ridge to promote outgrowth in the chick wing bud when disconnected from posterior apical ridge was examined by rotating the posterior portion of the stage-19/20 to stage-21 wing bud around its anteroposterior axis. This permitted contact between the anterior and posterior mesoderm, without removing wing bud tissue. In a small but significant number of cases (10/54), anterior structures (digit 2) formed spatially isolated from posterior structures (digits 3 and 4). Thus, continuity with posterior ridge is not a prerequisite for anterior-ridge function in the wing bud. Nevertheless, posterior-ridge removal does result in anterior limb truncation. To investigate events leading to anterior truncation, we examined cell death patterns in the wing bud following posterior-ridge removal. We observed an abnormal area of necrosis along the posterior border of the wing bud at 6-12 h following posterior-ridge removal. This was followed by necrosis in the distal, anterior mesoderm at 48 h postoperatively and subsequent anterior truncation. Clearly, healthy posterior limb bud mesoderm is needed for anterior limb bud survival and development. We propose that anterior truncation is the direct result of anterior mesodermal cell death and that this may not be related to positional specification of anterior cells. In our view, cell death of anterior mesoderm, after posterior mesoderm removal, should not be used as evidence for a role in position specification by the polarizing zone during the limb bud stages of development. We suggest that the posterior mesoderm that maintains the anterior mesoderm need not be restricted to the mapped polarizing zone, but is more extensively distributed in the limb bud.     

The control of the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axes in embryonic chick limbs constructed of dissociated and reaggregated limb-bud mesoderm

In the 3- to 4-day embryonic avian limb bud, a unique zone of mesodermal tissue is located posteriorly at the junction of bud and body wall. Appropriately grafted to a host limb bud, it induces the formation of a supernumerary limb outgrowth from preaxial tissue and determines that its posterior side will face the graft. It is called the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA).When limb-bud mesoderm is isolated, dissociated, reaggregated centrifugally, jacketed in the mesoderm-free hull of another limb bud, and grown as a graft on a host embryo, the recombinant frequently forms a limb-like structure terminating in digits that fail to show differentiation with respect to the anteroposterior axis. When, however, a bit of ZPA tissue is implanted in the recombinant subjacent to the anterior or posterior margin of the ectoderm, the resulting outgrowth shows a characteristic anteroposterior order of digits that corresponds to the placement of the implant, regardless of its relationship with the anteroposterior axis of the ectoderm or of the host embryo.Dorsoventral differentials have been recognized only in limbs formed from reaggregated leg-bud mesoderm. The direction of the dorsoventral axis always corresponds to the original axis of the ectodermal jacket regardless of the orientation of the recombinant on the host.     

Position of origin of donor posterior chick wing bud tissue transplanted to an anterior host site determines the extra structures formed

The formation of supernumerary limb structures was studied by juxtaposing normally nonadjacent embryonic chick limb bud tissue. Different “wedges” (ectodern and mesoderm) of posterior donor right wing bud (stage 21) were transplanted to a slit made in stage 20–23 host right wing buds. Donor posterior tissue was transplanted to an anterior position in a host wing bud or, as a control, to the same position as its position of origin. Transplanting different wedges of posterior tissue to the same anterior host position results in wings with supernumerary structures, and different extra structures form depending on the position of origin of the donor tissue. The identification of extra limb structures formed was based on the skeletal and integumentary patterns of resulting wings and the pattern of muscles as seen in serial sections of resulting limbs. The results of experiments presented here are considered in light of current models that have been used to describe the formation of supernumerary limb structures by the embryonic chick limb bud.     

Normal development of the skeleton in chick limb buds devoid of dorsal ectoderm

It has been suggested that the ectoderm on the dorsal and ventral faces of the limb bud plays a part in controlling the pattern of cartilage differentiation. To test this, the dorsal wing bud ectoderm in the chick embryo was destroyed by irradiation with ultraviolet light at stage 17-19, at the very beginning of limb bud development, but the apical ectodermal ridge was spared. The irradiated ectoderm disappeared within 24 hr (by stage 23-24) and did not regenerate thereafter; thus the dorsal surface of the limb bud was kept denuded throughout most of the period of skeletal pattern formation. By 6 or 7 days after the irradiation (stage 35), when the rudiments of all the adult skeletal elements are normally present in recognizable form, the irradiated wings could be placed into two categories, those that were approximately normal in shape and those that had curled dorsally. All of these limbs were reduced in size, to varying degrees, when compared to their controls and lacked dorsal soft tissues. The limbs that were normal in shape, however, even though sometimes denuded over practically the whole extent of their dorsal surface, almost always had a complete and normally proportioned cartilage pattern, suggesting that ectoderm (other than the apical ectodermal ridge) does not exert any direct control over the development of the limb cartilage pattern. However, many of those limbs that had curled as a result of the irradiation did have major pattern deformities, suggesting that the topology of cartilage differentiation does depend on the shape of the limb bud.