Specific Conformations and Interactions in Chicken Erythrocyte Histone F2C

THE close association of histones with DNA in the eukaryote chromosome has implicated them in two possible functions; first, a structural role in maintaining and controlling the conformations of the chromosome through the cell cycle and second, involvement in genetic control mechanisms¹. The relatively small number of histones and the rigid conservation of sequence found for histone F2A1 (see ref. 2) and suspected for other histones argue more for a structural role and involvement in the gross repression of inactive genes than for a role in the precise control of active genes. The sequence studies of histones^2–6 have delineated well defined regions of the chain, rich either in basic and helix-destabilizing residues or rich in apolar, acidic and aromatic residues. Physical studies^7–11 have demonstrated that the later regions are the sites of secondary structure and histone-histone interaction, while the former are the sites of DNA interaction. Thus, although particular regions of the histone chains have been correlated with quite different functions, there has been no evidence so far to show that the relatively non-basic segments fold up so specifically as in globular proteins. If, however, histones are involved in controlling the conformation of chromosomes, then specific and reversible interactions are to be expected. The very lysine-rich histones are distinguished from other histones in that microheterogeneity has been found for F1 (refs. 12–14), while F2C is polymorphic¹⁵ and it has been suggested that they have a function additional to structural. Histone F2C is unique to nucleated erythrocytes¹⁶, largely replacing F1 therein and could be involved in the total repression of erythrocyte genes.     

Histone synthesis in early amphibian development: histone and DNA syntheses are not co-ordinated

The synthesis of basic proteins has been studied in the oocytes, eggs and embryos of the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. A group of newly synthesized proteins has been identified as histones by the following criteria: solubility properties; incorporation of [³H]lysine and [³H]arginine in the correct proportions, but lack of incorporation of [³H]tryptophan; co-cleotrophoresis with marker histones in various types of polyacrylamide gels, including a type run in two dimensions; peptide analysis of the arginine-rich fraction, F2A1. The four main histone fractions other than F1 were found to be synthesized at all stages of development. F1 histone synthesis was first detected at the late blastula stage.Rates of histone synthesis were estimated for the different stages of development and it was concluded that histone synthesis was not co-ordinated with DNA synthesis either temporally or quantitatively. Histone synthesis was unusual in the following major respects: histones were synthesized in oocytes, and yet in these cells DNA replication had not occurred for several months; histones were synthesized in activated or fertilized eggs at a rate far in excess (about 500 times) of the immediate requirements. We suggest that in order to provide enough histones for the late blastula embryo a store of histone is accumulated during the early cleavage stages and possibly during oogenesis.     

Proton Magnetic Resonance Studies of Conformational Changes in Cleaved Halves of Histone F2B

THE amino-acid sequences of the histones F2A1¹ and F2B² are of particular interest in that they have such a high degree of non-uniformity that different regions of the polypeptide chains have quite different characters. The amino-halves of the molecules have a high density of basic residues while the carboxyl-halves have far fewer basic residues and higher proportions of apolar residues and other residues which favour the formation of helical conformations. These properties have led to the suggestions that the regions of high basicity are the primary sites for interaction with DNA^1–4 in chromatin and that the non-basic regions contain any secondary structure that the molecule is capable of forming^1–4 and are the sites for histone–histone interactions^3,4. Evidence in support of this scheme has been obtained from nuclear magnetic resonance and optical spectroscopic studies of conformational changes and interactions in histones F1 and F2A1³ and F2B⁴. In these studies, however, the whole molecule has been examined and the possibility of the formation of some secondary structure in the basic region of the molecule cannot be excluded.     

Circular dichroism of histone-bound regions in chromatin.

Native, NaCl-treated, trypsin-treated, and polylysine-bound nucleohistones were studied in 2.5 × 10^?4 M EDTA, pH 8.0, using circular dichroism (CD) and thermal denaturation. Removal of histone I by 0.6 M NaCl has a much smaller effect on both Δε₂₂₀ and Δε₂₇₈ than the removal of other histones. This indicates that histone I has less helical content and less conformational effect on the DNA in nucleohistone. By extrapolating to 100% binding by histones other than I, the positive CD band near 275 nm is close to zero. Comparison is also made between the effects of binding by the more basic and the less basic halves of histones by trypsin-digestion and polylysine-binding experiments. Trypsin digestion of nucleohistone reduces melting band IV at 82°C much more than melting band III at 72°C. However, the CD changes of Δε₂₇₈ and Δε₂₂₀ induced by trypsin digestion are small, unless melting band III is also reduced by the use of a higher trypsin level. This implies that the less basic halves of histones, which stabilize DNA to 72°C (melting band III), have more helical structure and are more responsible for conformational change in DNA than are the more basic halves, which stabilize DNA to 82°C (melting band IV). Polylysine binding to nucleohistone diminishes melting band III but has no effect on melting band IV. This binding affects only slightly the Δε₂₂₀ of nucleohistone, indicating that polylysine interferes very little with the structure of the less basic halves of bound histones. The implications of these studies with respect to chromatin structure are discussed.     

Affinity of chromatin constituents for isopeptidase

Isopeptidase is a novel eukaryotic enzyme that cleaves a structural chromatin protein, A24, stoichiometrically into H2A and ubiquitin. To understand the rapid turnover of ubiquitin in mitosis as wells as the high specific activity of the enzyme associated with metaphase chromosomes, attempts were made to determine chromatin constituents that show high affinity for this enzyme. Endogenous protease-free isopeptidase was prepared from calf thymus and applied to a Sepharose 4B affinity column on which histones, DNA, NHCP and ubiquitin were respectively immobilized. The enzyme proved to bind only histones. To further determine which of the histone fractions is involved, affinity columns with each histone fraction were also used. The enzyme showed affinity for all histone fractions. However, the strength of affinity varied in the order H2A>H³ H2B≥H4?H1, being inversely correlated with the ratio of basic/acidic amino acids in these molecules. These results suggest that the turnover of A24 in mitosis is controlled, at least in part, by the affinity of enzyme for histones, and also that such affinity is caused by a mechanism which cannot be explained simply by the electrostatic interaction between negatively charged enzyme molecules and positively charged histones.     

In vitro interactions of histones and α-crystallin

The aggregation of crystallins in lenses is associated with cataract formation. We previously reported that mutant crystallins are associated with an increased abundance of histones in knock-in and knockout mouse models. However, very little is known about the specific interactions between lens crystallins and histones. Here, we performed in vitro analyses to determine whether α-crystallin interacts with histones directly. Isothermal titration calorimetry revealed a strong histone–α-crystallin binding with a K_d of 4 × 10^?7 M, and the thermodynamic parameters suggested that the interaction was both entropy and enthalpy driven. Size-exclusion chromatography further showed that histone–α-crystallin complexes are water soluble but become water insoluble as the concentration of histones is increased. Right-angle light scattering measurements of the water-soluble fractions of histone–α-crystallin mixtures showed a decrease in the oligomeric molecular weight of α-crystallin, indicating that histones alter the oligomerization of α-crystallin. Taken together, these findings reveal for the first time that histones interact with and affect the solubility and aggregation of α-crystallin, indicating that the interaction between α-crystallin and histones in the lens is functionally important.     

A Mechanism for Histone Chaperoning Activity of Nucleoplasmin: Thermodynamic and Structural Models

Nucleoplasmin (NP), a histone chaperone, acts as a reservoir for histones H2A-H2B in Xenopus laevis eggs and can displace sperm nuclear basic proteins and linker histones from the chromatin fiber of sperm and quiescent somatic nuclei. NP has been proposed to mediate the dynamic exchange of histones during the expression of certain genes and assists the assembly of nucleosomes by modulating the interaction between histones and DNA. Here, solution structural models of full-length NP and NP complexes with the functionally distinct nucleosomal core and linker histones are presented for the first time, providing a picture of the physical interactions between the nucleosomal and linker histones with NP core and tail domains. Small-angle X-ray scattering and isothermal titration calorimetry reveal that NP pentamer can accommodate five histones, either H2A-H2B dimers or H5, and that NP core and tail domains are intimately involved in the association with histones. The analysis of the binding events, employing a site-specific cooperative model, reveals a negative cooperativity-based regulatory mechanism for the linker histone/nucleosomal histone exchange. The two histone types bind with drastically different intrinsic affinity, and the strongest affinity is observed for the NP variant that mimicks the hyperphosphorylated active protein. The different “affinity windows” for H5 and H2A-H2B might allow NP to fulfill its histone chaperone role, simultaneously acting as a reservoir for the core histones and a chromatin decondensing factor. Our data are compatible with the previously proposed model where NP facilitates nucleosome assembly by removing the linker histones and depositing H2A-H2B dimers onto DNA.     

Characterization of pea histone deacetylases

The present paper is the first report on histone deacetylases from plants. Three enzyme fractions with histone deacetylase activity (HD0, HD1 and HD2) have been partially purified from pea (Pisum sativum) embryonic axes. They deacetylate biologically acetylated chicken histones and, to a lesser extent, chemically acetylated histones, this being a criterion of their true histone deacetylase nature. The three enzymes are able to accept nucleosomes as substrates. HD1 is not inhibited by n-butyrate up to 50 mM, whereas HD0 and HD2 are only slightly inhibited, thereby establishing a clear difference to animal histone deacetylases. The three activities are inhibited by acetate, Cu²⁺ and Zn²⁺ ions and mercurials, but are only scarcely affected by polyamines, in strong contrast with yeast histone deacetylase. Several criteria have been used to obtain cumulative evidence that HD0, HD1 and HD2 actually are three distinct enzymes. In vitro experiments with free histones show that HD0 deacetylates all four core histones, whereas HD1 and HD2 show a clear preference for H2A and H2B, the arginine-rich histones being deacetylated more slowly.     

Establishment of Histone Modifications after Chromatin Assembly

Every cell has to duplicate its entire genome during S-phase of the cell cycle. After replication, the newly synthesized DNA is rapidly assembled into chromatin. The newly assembled chromatin ‘matures’ and adopts a variety of different conformations. This differential packaging of DNA plays an important role for the maintenance of gene expression patterns and has to be reliably copied in each cell division. Posttranslational histone modifications are prime candidates for the regulation of the chromatin structure. In order to understand the maintenance of chromatin structures, it is crucial to understand the replication of histone modification patterns. To study the kinetics of histone modifications in vivo, we have pulse-labeled synchronized cells with an isotopically labeled arginine (¹⁵N₄) that is 4 Da heavier than the naturally occurring ¹⁴N₄ isoform. As most of the histone synthesis is coupled with replication, the cells were arrested at the G1/S boundary, released into S-phase and simultaneously incubated in the medium containing heavy arginine, thus labeling all newly synthesized proteins. This method allows a comparison of modification patterns on parental versus newly deposited histones. Experiments using various pulse/chase times show that particular modifications have considerably different kinetics until they have acquired a modification pattern indistinguishable from the parental histones.     

The histones of the sperm of Spisula solidissima include a novel, cysteine-containing H-1 histone

The histones remaining at the end of the spermiogenic differentiation, which are found associated with a highly basic protamine-like component [Ausio, J. and K.E. Van Holde (1987) Eur. J. Biochem. 165, 363-371] in the mature sperm of Spisula solidissima, have been isolated and characterized for the first time. All four core histones H2A, H2B, H3, H4, and the lysine-rich histone H1 are present. The core histones are found in equal stoichiometric amounts. As has been observed in other bivalve molluscs, the amino acid compositions of the core histones of S. solidissima sperm are very close to those of their counterparts in the calf thymus somatic histones. The spermatic histone H1 exhibits an amino acid composition and structural features similar to other histones of the histone H1 family. Yet this latter histone seems to be sperm-specific, and it contains at least two cysteine residues per molecule, which makes it unique in its class.     

Histone acetyltransferase in chromatin. Extraction of transferase activity from chromatin

Previous work has attempted to localize nuclear histone acetyltransferase activity in the cromatin. Evidence was presented indicating that the transfer of ¹⁴C-acetate from ¹⁴C-acetyl CoA to histones in chromatin was an enzymatic process. We now report on the extraction of part of the histone acetyltransferase activity from rat liver chromatin, employing a procedure originally described for extraction of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The K_m of the extracted transferase activity for the substrate acetyl CoA was 5 × 10⁻⁷, the Q₁₀: 1.8 and the optimal pH: 7.1. Serum albumine, protamine and polylysine were poor substrates as compared to histones. Activity of extracted or heated chromatin was not restored upon incubation in the presence of extract. Also the selectivity exhibited by the transferase activity in unextracted chromatin towards arginine-rich histones, was much less pronounced in the extracts prepared from it. It is possible that the influence of steric factors contributing to this specificity in native chromatin is lost upon isolation of the enzyme from it. Alternatively, a less specific isoenzyme may have been extracted.     

Lysine-rich histone H1 kinase from soybean hypocotyl.

A protein kinase (ATP: histone phosphotransferase) with high specificity for the phosphorylation of the very lysine-rich histone H1 has been partially purified and characterized from soybean hypocotyl. The enzyme has a molecular weight of about 48,500. Its activity and sedimentation behavior are refractory to cyclic nucleoside monophosphates. No significant amount of cyclic AMP or cyclic GMP binding activity could be detected in the crude or partially purified enzyme preparations. Km for ATP and histone H1 are 0.4 μM and 0.7 μM, respectively. The enzyme requires Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺ for activity, while addition of 0.5 mM Ca²⁺, Zn²⁺ or Hg²⁺ results in 50% inhibition. Arginine-rich histones H3 and H4 are inhibitory to histone H1 phosphorylation; these histones affect the Vmax of the enzyme, but not the Km for histone H1.     

Evidence from triton X-100 polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis that histone f2a2, not f2b, is phosphorylated in Chinese hamster cells

Chinese hamster cells (line CHO) were labeled in suspension culture with ³H-lysine and ³²PH₃PO₄. Preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of histone fractions from these cells was performed in the presence of 8 $\text{M}$ urea, 6 mM Triton X-100, and 0.9 N acetic acid. This method separates histones f2a2 and f2b by a Large distance, thus making it possible to resolve the controversy concerning which histone -- f2b or f2a2 -- is phosphorylated. It is shown that the two most highly phosphorylated histones in interphase CHO cells are f1 and f2a2. Histones f2b and f3 are shown to contain no significant incorporation of ³²PO₄ in interphase cells, while histone f2a1 contains a small but detectable amount of incorporated ³²PO₄. Binding of the nonionic detergent Triton X-100 to hydrophobic centers appears to be greatest for histones f2a2 and f3, thus significantly retarding the mobility of these two histones during electrophoresis.     

The vertebrate linker histones H10, H5, and H1M are descendants of invertebrate “orphon” histone H1 genes

We investigated the evolutionary history of the divergent vertebrate linker histones H1⁰, H5, and HIM. We observed that the sequence of the central conserved domain of these vertebrate proteins shares characteristic features with histone H1 proteins of plants and invertebrate animals which otherwise never appear in any vertebrate histone H1 protein. A quantitative analysis of 58 linker histone sequences also reveals that these proteins are more similar to invertebrate and plant histone H1 than to histone H1 of vertebrates. A phylogenetic tree deduced from an alignment of the central domain of all known linker histones places H1⁰, H5, and HIM in close vicinity to invertebrate sperm histone H1 proteins and to invertebrate histone H1 proteins encoded by polyadenylated mRNAs. We therefore conclude that the ancestors of the vertebrate linker histones H1⁰, H5, and HIM diverged from the main group of histone H1 proteins before the vertebrate type of histone H1 was established in evolution. We discuss this observation in the general context of linker histone evolution. Correspondence to: B. and E. Schulze     

Uncoordinate synthesis of histone H1 in cells arrested in the G1 phase

It has been known for several years that DNA replication and histone synthesis occur concomitantly in cultured mammalian cells. Normally all five classes of histones are synthesized coordinately. However, mouse myeloma cells, synchronized by starvation for isoleucine, synthesize increased amounts of histone H1 relative to the four nucleosomal core histones. This unscheduled synthesis of histone H1 is reduced within 1 h after refeeding isoleucine, and is not a normal component of G1. The synthesis of H1 increases coordinately again with other histones during the S phase. The DNA synthesis inhibitors, cytosine arabinoside and hydroxyurea, block all histone synthesis in S-phase cells. The levels of histone H1 mRNA, relative to the other histone mRNAs, is increased in isoeleucine-starved cells and decreases rapidly after refeeding isoleucine. The increased incorporation of histone H1 is at least partially due to the low isoleucine content of histone H1. Starvation of cells for lysine resulted in a decrease in H1 synthesis relative to core histones. Again the ratio was altered on refeeding the amino acid. 3T3 cells starved for serum also incorporated only H1 histones into chromatin. The ratio of different H1 proteins also changed. The synthesis of the H1⁰ protein was predominant in G₀ cells, and reduced in S-phase cells. These data indicate the metabolism of H1 is independent of the other histones when cell growth is arrested.     

Cloning and Functional Analysis of Histones H3 and H4 in Nuclear Shaping during Spermatogenesis of the Chinese Mitten Crab,Eriocheir sinensis

During spermatogenesis in most animals, the basic proteins associated with DNA are continuously changing and somatic-typed histones are partly replaced by sperm-specific histones, which are then successively replaced by transition proteins and protamines. With the replacement of sperm nuclear basic proteins, nuclei progressively undergo chromatin condensation. The Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) is also known as the hairy crab or river crab (phylum Arthropoda, subphylum Crustacea, order Decapoda, and family Grapsidae). The spermatozoa of this species are aflagellate, and each has a spherical acrosome surrounded by a cup-shaped nucleus, peculiar to brachyurans. An interesting characteristic of the E. sinensis sperm nucleus is its lack of electron-dense chromatin. However, its formation is not clear. In this study, sequences encoding histones H3 and H4 were cloned by polymerase chain reaction amplification. Western blotting indicated that H3 and H4 existed in the sperm nuclei. Immunofluorescence and ultrastructural immunocytochemistry demonstrated that histones H3 and H4 were both present in the nuclei of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids and mature spermatozoa. The nuclear labeling density of histone H4 decreased in sperm nuclei, while histone H3 labeling was not changed significantly. Quantitative real-time PCR showed that the mRNA expression levels of histones H3 and H4 were higher at mitotic and meiotic stages than in later spermiogenesis. Our study demonstrates that the mature sperm nuclei of E. sinensis contain histones H3 and H4. This is the first report that the mature sperm nucleus of E. sinensis contains histones H3 and H4. This finding extends the study of sperm histones of E. sinensis and provides some basic data for exploring how decapod crustaceans form uncondensed sperm chromatin.     

Histone rearrangements accompany nuclear differentiation and dedifferentiation in Tetrahymena

Histone synthesis and deposition into specific classes of nuclei has been investigated in starved and conjugating Tetrahymena. During starvation and early stages of conjugation (between 0 and 5 hr after opposite mating types are mixed), micronuclei selectively lose preexisting micronuclear-specific histones α, β, γ, and H3^F. Of these histones, only α appears to accumulate in micronuclear chromatin through active synthesis and deposition during the mating process. Curiously, α is not observed (by stain or label) in young macronuclear anlagen (4C, 10 hr of conjugation). Thus, young macronuclear anlagen are missing all of the histones which are known to be specific to micronuclei of vegetative cells. By 14–16 hr of conjugation, we observe active synthesis and deposition of macronuclear-specific histones, hv1, hv2, and H1, into new macronuclear anlagen (8C). Thus macronuclear differentiation seems well underway by this time of conjugation. It is also in this time period (14–16 hr) that we first detect significant amounts of micronuclear-specific H1-like polypeptides β and γ in micronuclear extracts. These polypeptides do not seem to be synthesized during this period, which suggests that β and γ are derived from a precursor molecule(s). Since these micronuclear-specific histones do not appear in micronuclear chromatin until after other micronuclei have been selected to differentiate as macronuclei, we suspect that micronuclear differentiation is also an important process which occurs in 10–16 hr mating cells. Our results also suggest that proteolytic processing of micronuclear H3^S into H3^F (which occurs in a cell cycle dependent fashion during vegetative growth) is not operative during most if not all of conjugation. Thus micronuclei of mating cells contain only H3^S which also seems consistent with the fact that some micronuclei differentiate into new macronuclei (micronuclear H3^S is indistinguishable from macronuclear H3). Interestingly, the only H3 synthesized and deposited into the former macronucleus of mating cells is the relatively minor macronuclear-specific H3-like variant, hv2. These results demonstrate that significant histone rearrangements occur during conjugation in Tetrahymena in a manner consistent with the fact that during conjugation some micronuclei eventually differentiate into new macronuclei. Our results suggest that selective synthesis and deposition of specific histones (and histone variants) plays an important role in the nuclear differentiation process in Tetrahymena. The disappearance of specific histones also raises the possibility that developmentally regulated proteolytic processing of specific histones plays an important (and previously unsuspected) role in this system.