Distinct Roles of β-Arrestin 1 and β-Arrestin 2 in ORG27569-induced Biased Signaling and Internalization of the Cannabinoid Receptor 1 (CB1)

The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is a G protein-coupled receptor primarily expressed in brain tissue that has been implicated in several disease states. CB1 allosteric compounds, such as {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569, offer enormous potential as drugs over orthosteric ligands, but their mechanistic, structural, and downstream effects upon receptor binding have not been established. Previously, we showed that {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 enhances agonist binding affinity to CB1 but inhibits G protein-dependent agonist signaling efficacy in HEK293 cells and rat brain expressing the CB1 receptor (Ahn, K. H., Mahmoud, M. M., and Kendall, D. A. (2012) J. Biol. Chem. 287, 12070–12082). Here, we identify the mediators of CB1 receptor internalization and {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569-induced G protein-independent signaling. Using siRNA technology, we elucidate an {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569-induced signaling mechanism for CB1 wherein β-arrestin 1 mediates short term signaling to ERK1/2 with a peak at 5 min and other upstream kinase components including MEK1/2 and c-Src. Consistent with these findings, we demonstrate co-localization of CB1-GFP with red fluorescent protein-β-arrestin 1 upon {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 treatment using confocal microscopy. In contrast, we show the critical role of β-arrestin 2 in CB1 receptor internalization upon treatment with CP55940 (agonist) or treatment with {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569. These results demonstrate for the first time the involvement of β-arrestin in CB1-biased signaling by a CB1 allosteric modulator and also define the differential role of the two β-arrestin isoforms in CB1 signaling and internalization.     

Allosteric modulator ORG27569 induces CB1 cannabinoid receptor high affinity agonist binding state, receptor internalization, and Gi protein-independent ERK1/2 kinase activation

The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1), a member of the class A G protein-coupled receptor family, is expressed in brain tissue where agonist stimulation primarily activates the pertussis toxin-sensitive inhibitory G protein (G(i)). Ligands such as CP55940 ((1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3- hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol) and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol are orthosteric agonists for the receptor, bind the conventional binding pocket, and trigger G(i)-mediated effects including inhibition of adenylate cyclase. ORG27569 (5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-(4-piperidin-1-yl-phenyl)ethyl]amide) has been identified as an allosteric modulator that displays positive cooperativity for CP55940 binding to CB1 yet acts as an antagonist of G protein coupling. To examine this apparent conundrum, we used the wild-type CB1 and two mutants, T210A and T210I (D'Antona, A. M., Ahn, K. H., and Kendall, D. A. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 5606-5617), which collectively cover a spectrum of receptor states from inactive to partially active to more fully constitutively active. Using these receptors, we demonstrated that ORG27569 induces a CB1 receptor state that is characterized by enhanced agonist affinity and decreased inverse agonist affinity consistent with an active conformation. Also consistent with this conformation, the impact of ORG27569 binding was most dramatic on the inactive T210A receptor and less pronounced on the already active T210I receptor. Although ORG27569 antagonized CP55940-induced guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding, which is indicative of G protein coupling inhibition in a concentration-dependent manner, the ORG27569-induced conformational change of the CB1 receptor led to cellular internalization and downstream activation of ERK signaling, providing the first case of allosteric ligand-biased signaling via CB1. ORG27569-induced ERK phosphorylation persisted even after pertussis toxin treatment to abrogate G(i) and occurs in HEK293 and neuronal cells.     

Allosteric Modulation of a Cannabinoid G Protein-coupled Receptor: BINDING SITE ELUCIDATION AND RELATIONSHIP TO G PROTEIN SIGNALING*

The cannabinoid 1 (CB₁) allosteric modulator, 5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-(4-piperidin-1-yl-phenyl)-ethyl]-amide) ({"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569), has the paradoxical effect of increasing the equilibrium binding of [³H](−)-3-[2-hydroxyl-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-[3-hydroxylpropyl]cyclohexan-1-ol (CP55,940, an orthosteric agonist) while at the same time decreasing its efficacy (in G protein-mediated signaling). {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 also decreases basal signaling, acting as an inverse agonist for the G protein-mediated signaling pathway. In ligand displacement assays, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 can displace the CB₁ antagonist/inverse agonist, N-(piperidiny-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide(SR141716A). The goal of this work was to identify the binding site of {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 at CB₁. To this end, we used computation, synthesis, mutation, and functional studies to identify the {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569-binding site in the CB₁ TMH3-6-7 region. This site is consistent with the results of K3.28¹⁹²A, F3.36²⁰⁰A, W5.43²⁷⁹A, W6.48³⁵⁶A, and F3.25¹⁸⁹A mutation studies, which revealed the {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569-binding site overlaps with our previously determined binding site of SR141716A but extends extracellularly. Additionally, we identified a key electrostatic interaction between the {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 piperidine ring nitrogen and K3.28¹⁹² that is important for {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 to act as an inverse agonist. At this allosteric site, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 promotes an intermediate conformation of the CB₁ receptor, explaining {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569''s ability to increase equilibrium binding of CP55,940. This site also explains {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569''s ability to antagonize the efficacy of CP55,940 in three complementary ways. 1) {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 sterically blocks movements of the second extracellular loop that have been linked to receptor activation. 2) {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 sterically blocks a key electrostatic interaction between the third extracellular loop residue Lys-373 and D2.63¹⁷⁶. 3) {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ORG27569","term_id":"1179174593","term_text":"ORG27569"}}ORG27569 packs against TMH6, sterically hindering movements of this helix that have been shown to be important for receptor activation.     

A Lipid Pathway for Ligand Binding Is Necessary for a Cannabinoid G Protein-coupled Receptor

Recent isothiocyanate covalent labeling studies have suggested that a classical cannabinoid, (−)-7′-isothiocyanato-11-hydroxy-1′,1′dimethylheptyl-hexahydrocannabinol (AM841), enters the cannabinoid CB2 receptor via the lipid bilayer (Pei, Y., Mercier, R. W., Anday, J. K., Thakur, G. A., Zvonok, A. M., Hurst, D., Reggio, P. H., Janero, D. R., and Makriyannis, A. (2008) Chem. Biol. 15, 1207–1219). However, the sequence of steps involved in such a lipid pathway entry has not yet been elucidated. Here, we test the hypothesis that the endogenous cannabinoid sn-2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) attains access to the CB2 receptor via the lipid bilayer. To this end, we have employed microsecond time scale all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the interaction of 2-AG with CB2 via a palmitoyl-oleoyl-phosphatidylcholine lipid bilayer. Results suggest the following: 1) 2-AG first partitions out of bulk lipid at the transmembrane α-helix (TMH) 6/7 interface; 2) 2-AG then enters the CB2 receptor binding pocket by passing between TMH6 and TMH7; 3) the entrance of the 2-AG headgroup into the CB2 binding pocket is sufficient to trigger breaking of the intracellular TMH3/6 ionic lock and the movement of the TMH6 intracellular end away from TMH3; and 4) subsequent to protonation at D3.49/D6.30, further 2-AG entry into the ligand binding pocket results in both a W6.48 toggle switch change and a large influx of water. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration via unbiased molecular dynamics that a ligand can access the binding pocket of a class A G protein-coupled receptor via the lipid bilayer and the first demonstration via molecular dynamics of G protein-coupled receptor activation triggered by a ligand binding event.     

Molecular Basis of Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Coupling to the G Protein Heterotrimer Gαiβγ: IDENTIFICATION OF KEY CB1 CONTACTS WITH THE C-TERMINAL HELIX α5 OF Gαi*

The cannabinoid (CB1) receptor is a member of the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. The human CB1 receptor, which is among the most expressed receptors in the brain, has been implicated in several disease states, including drug addiction, anxiety, depression, obesity, and chronic pain. Different classes of CB1 agonists evoke signaling pathways through the activation of specific subtypes of G proteins. The molecular basis of CB1 receptor coupling to its cognate G protein is unknown. As a first step toward understanding CB1 receptor-mediated G protein signaling, we have constructed a ternary complex structural model of the CB1 receptor and G_i heterotrimer (CB1-G_i), guided by the x-ray structure of β₂-adrenergic receptor (β₂AR) in complex with G_s (β₂AR-G_s), through 824-ns duration molecular dynamics simulations in a fully hydrated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine bilayer environment. We identified a group of residues at the juxtamembrane regions of the intracellular loops 2 and 3 (IC2 and IC3) of the CB1 receptor, including Ile-218^3.54, Tyr-224^IC2, Asp-338^6.30, Arg-340^6.32, Leu-341^6.33, and Thr-344^6.36, as potential key contacts with the extreme C-terminal helix α₅ of Gα_i. Ala mutations of these residues at the receptor-G_i interface resulted in little G protein coupling activity, consistent with the present model of the CB1-G_i complex, which suggests tight interactions between CB1 and the extreme C-terminal helix α₅ of Gα_i. The model also suggests that unique conformational changes in the extreme C-terminal helix α₅ of Gα play a crucial role in the receptor-mediated G protein activation.     

Synthesis and structure–activity relationship of novel diarylpyrazole imide analogues as CB1 cannabinoid receptor ligands

A myriad of research groups have been engaged in searching for novel CB1 receptor antagonists, since SR141716A (rimonabant), a CB1 receptor antagonist, was discovered for an obesity treatment. In this research, extended series, based on the 1,5-diarylpyrazole template of rimonabant, was synthesized and tested for CB1 receptor binding affinity. In the present study, N-piperidinylcarboxamide group of rimonabant was replaced with the corresponding sulfonamide, imide, N-methyl imide and methylenediamide, respectively. The SAR studies to optimize the CB1 binding affinity led to the potent imide derivatives. The in vivo efficacy test of a derivative (16f) gave a promising result for this novel scaffold. In order to explore physicochemical properties (hydrophobic, steric and electronic) of the representative imide derivatives responsible for their CB1 receptor binding affinity, quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) studies were performed. Hansch QSAR models, which were moderate in the explanation for SAR, were generated with hydrophobic, steric and electronic properties of substituents. Especially, the Taft Es-based parabolic model was obtained with the best correlation result (r² = 0.846).     

Characterization of the progesterone receptor of rabbit uterus with the synthetic progestin 16α-ethyl-21-hydroxy-19-norpregn-4-ene-3,20-dione

The synthetic progestin 16α-ethyl-21-hydroxy-19-norpregn-4-ene-3,20-dione (Org 2058) was used to characterize the progesterone receptor in the uterine cytosol of the rabbit. [³H] Org 2058 binds to a homogeneous population of protin binding sites with an apparent association equilibrium constant of 7.7· 10⁸ M⁻¹ at 0°C. The concentration of protein-bound steroid at saturation is 2.3 pmol per mg of cytosol protein. [³H] Progesterone binds to the same set of binding sites but exhibits a 4–5 fold lower apparent association constant. The difference in affinity is mainly due to a 13-fold slower rate of dissociation of the synthetic progestin compared with progesterone. Org 2058 competes very efficiently for the binding of [³H] progesterone to the uterine cytosol, and progesterone also competes, although less efficiently, for the binding of [³H]-Org 2058. There is a good correlation between the progestational activity of various steroids and their ability to compete with [³H] Org 2058 binding to the cytosol. At 0°C, there is no metabolic transformation of either Org 2058 or progesterone in the uterine cytosol.When filled with the steroid, the progesterone receptor is stable, but in the absence of the steroid the receptor binding sites are thermolabile and show a rapid decay at 20°C . Org 2058 is more effective than progesterone in protecting the receptor against thermal inactivation. The rate constant of association and dissociation of [³H] Org 2058 and the cytosol receptor are strongly dependent on temperature and the activation energy of the dissociation reaction is 17.8 kcal/mol. The equilibrium association constant is less dependent on temperature and exhibits ΔH° of −4.7 kcal/mol. The binding reaction shows a positive entropy change of 23 cal · K⁻¹ · mol⁻¹.At low ionic strength the complex of Org 2058 and the progesterone receptor tends ot aggregate. It sediments as a broad peak on sucrose gradients (4–6 S), and is excluded from columns of Sephadex G-100 and G-200. At concentrations of NaCl above 0.15 M, the receptor sediments in sucrose gradients as an homogeneous peak at 3.6 S, but upon gel filtration it aggregates and a complex elution pattern is observed, that prevents a precise estimation of the molecular weight.     

Conformational Selection and Equilibrium Governs the Ability of Retinals to Bind Opsin

Despite extensive study, how retinal enters and exits the visual G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin remains unclear. One clue may lie in two openings between transmembrane helix 1 (TM1) and TM7 and between TM5 and TM6 in the active receptor structure. Recently, retinal has been proposed to enter the inactive apoprotein opsin (ops) through these holes when the receptor transiently adopts the active opsin conformation (ops*). Here, we directly test this “transient activation” hypothesis using a fluorescence-based approach to measure rates of retinal binding to samples containing differing relative fractions of ops and ops*. In contrast to what the transient activation hypothesis model would predict, we found that binding for the inverse agonist, 11-cis-retinal (11CR), slowed when the sample contained more ops* (produced using M257Y, a constitutively activating mutation). Interestingly, the increased presence of ops* allowed for binding of the agonist, all-trans-retinal (ATR), whereas WT opsin showed no binding. Shifting the conformational equilibrium toward even more ops* using a G protein peptide mimic (either free in solution or fused to the receptor) accelerated the rate of ATR binding and slowed 11CR binding. An arrestin peptide mimic showed little effect on 11CR binding; however, it stabilized opsin·ATR complexes. The TM5/TM6 hole is apparently not involved in this conformational selection. Increasing its size by mutagenesis did not enable ATR binding but instead slowed 11CR binding, suggesting that it may play a role in trapping 11CR. In summary, our results indicate that conformational selection dictates stable retinal binding, which we propose involves ATR and 11CR binding to different states, the latter a previously unidentified, open-but-inactive conformation.     

Probing the Interaction of SR141716A with the CB1 Receptor

SR141716A binds selectively to the brain cannabinoid (CB1) receptor and exhibits a potent inverse agonist/antagonist activity. Although SR141716A, also known as rimonabant, has been withdrawn from the market due to severe side effects, there remains interest in some of its many potential medical applications. Consequently, it is imperative to understand the mechanism by which SR141716A exerts its inverse agonist activity. As a result of using an approach combining mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations, we determined the binding mode of SR141716A. We found from the simulation of the CB1-SR141716A complex that SR141716A projects toward TM5 to interact tightly with the major binding pocket, replacing the coordinated water molecules, and secures the Trp-356^6.48 rotameric switch in the inactive state to promote the formation of an extensive water-mediated H-bonding network to the highly conserved SLAXAD and NPXXY motifs in TM2/TM7. We identify for the first time the involvement of the minor binding pocket formed by TM2/TM3/TM7 for SR141716A binding, which complements the major binding pocket formed by TM3/TM5/TM6. Simulation of the F174^2.61A mutant CB1-SR141716A complex demonstrates the perturbation of TM2 that attenuates SR141716A binding indirectly. These results suggest SR141716A exerts inverse agonist activity through the stabilization of both TM2 and TM5, securing the Trp-356^6.48 rotameric switch and restraining it from activation.     

Profiling two indole‐2‐carboxamides for allosteric modulation of the CB1 receptor

Allosteric modulation of G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represents a novel approach for fine‐tuning GPCR functions. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor, a GPCR associated with the CNS, has been implicated in the treatment of drug addiction, pain, and appetite disorders. We report here the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of two indole‐2‐carboxamides:5‐chloro‐3‐ethyl‐1‐methyl‐N‐(4‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)phenethyl)‐1H‐indole‐2‐carboxamide (ICAM‐a) and 5‐chloro‐3‐pentyl‐N‐(4‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)phenethyl)‐1H‐indole‐2‐carboxamide (ICAM‐b). Although both ICAM‐a and ICAM‐b enhanced CP55, 940 binding, ICAM‐b exhibited the strongest positive cooperativity thus far demonstrated for enhancing agonist binding to the CB1 receptor. Although it displayed negative modulatory effects on G‐protein coupling to CB1, ICAM‐b induced β‐arrestin‐mediated downstream activation of extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) signaling. These results indicate that this compound represents a novel class of CB1 ligands that produce biased signaling via CB1.     

Oximes short-acting CB1 receptor agonists

New oximes short-acting CB1 agonists were explored by the introduction of an internal oxime and polar groups at the C3 alkyl tail of Δ⁸-THC. The scope of the research was to drastically alter two important physicochemical properties hydrophobicity (log P) and topological surface area (tPSA) of the compound, which play a critical role in tissue distribution and sequestration (depot effect). Key synthesized analogs demonstrated sub-nanomolar affinity for CB1, marked reduction in hydrophobicity (ClogP～2.5–3.5 vs 9.09 of Δ⁸-THC-DMH), and found to function as either agonists (trans-oximes) or neutral antagonists (cis-oximes) in a cAMP functional assay. All oxime analogs showed comparable affinity at the CB2 receptor, but surprisingly they were found to function as inverse agonists for CB2. In behavioral studies (i.e. analgesia, hypothermia) trans-oxime 8a exhibited a predictable fast onset (～20?min) and short duration of pharmacological action (～180?min), in contrast to the very prolonged duration of Δ⁸-THC-DMH (>24?h), thus limiting the potential for severe psychotropic side-effects associated with persistent activation of the CB1 receptor. We have conducted 100?ns molecular dynamic (MD) simulations of CB1 complexes with AM11542 (CB1 agonist) and both trans-8a and cis-8b isomeric oximes. These studies revealed that the C3 alkyl tail of cis-8b orientated within the CB1 binding pocket in a manner that triggered a conformational change that stabilized the CB1 receptor at its inactive-state (antagonistic functional effect). In contrast, the trans-8a isomer’s conformation was coincided with that of the AM11542 CB1 agonist-bound structure, stabilizing the CB1 receptor at the active-state (agonistic functional effect). We have selected oxime trans-8a based on its potency for CB1, and favorable pharmacodynamic profile, such as fast onset and predictable duration of pharmacological action, for evaluation in pre-clinical models of anorexia nervosa.     

Neuron‐type specific cannabinoid‐mediated G protein signalling in mouse hippocampus

Type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1) is expressed in different neuronal populations in the mammalian brain. In particular, CB1 on GABAergic or glutamatergic neurons exerts different functions and display different pharmacological properties in vivo. This suggests the existence of neuron‐type specific signalling pathways activated by different subpopulations of CB1. In this study, we analysed CB1 expression, binding and signalling in the hippocampus of conditional mutant mice, bearing CB1 deletion in GABAergic (GABA‐CB1‐KO mice) or cortical glutamatergic neurons (Glu‐CB1‐KO mice). Compared to their wild‐type littermates, Glu‐CB1‐KO displayed a small decrease of CB1 mRNA amount, immunoreactivity and [³H]CP55,940 binding. Conversely, GABA‐CB1‐KO mice showed a drastic reduction of these parameters, confirming that CB1 is present at much higher density on hippocampal GABAergic interneurons than glutamatergic neurons. Surprisingly, however, saturation analysis of HU210‐stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding demonstrated that ‘glutamatergic’ CB1 is more efficiently coupled to G protein signalling than ‘GABAergic’ CB1. Thus, the minority of CB1 on glutamatergic neurons is paradoxically several fold more strongly coupled to G protein signalling than ‘GABAergic’ CB1. This selective signalling mechanism raises the possibility of designing novel cannabinoid ligands that differentially activate only a subset of physiological effects of CB1 stimulation, thereby optimizing therapeutic action.     

7-Azaindolequinuclidinones (7-AIQD): A novel class of cannabinoid 1 (CB1) and cannabinoid 2 (CB2) receptor ligands

A series of N-benzyl-7-azaindolequinuclidinone (7-AIQD) analogs have been synthesized and evaluated for affinity toward CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors and identified as a novel class of cannabinoid receptor ligands. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies indicate that 7-AIQD analogs are dual CB1/CB2 receptor ligands exhibiting high potency with somewhat greater selectivity towards CB2 receptors compared to the previously reported indolequinuclidinone (IQD) analogs. Initial binding assays showed that 7-AIQD analogs 8b, 8d, 8f, 8g and 9b (1 μM) produced more that 50% displacement of the CB1/CB2 non-selective agonist CP-55,940 (0.1 nM). Furthermore, Ki values determined from full competition binding curves showed that analogs 8a, 8b and 8g exhibit high affinity (110, 115 and 23.7 nM, respectively) and moderate selectivity (26.3, 6.1 and 9.2-fold, respectively) for CB2 relative to CB1 receptors. Functional studies examining modulation of G-protein activity demonstrated that 8a acts as a neutral antagonist at CB1 and CB2 receptors, while 8b exhibits inverse agonist activity at these receptors. Analogs 8f and 8g exhibit different intrinsic activities, depending on the receptor examined. Molecular docking and binding free energy calculations for the most active compounds (8a, 8b, 8f, and 8g) were performed to better understand the CB2 receptor-selective mechanism at the atomic level. Compound 8g exhibited the highest predicted binding affinity at both CB1 and CB2 receptors, and all four compounds were shown to have higher predicted binding affinities with the CB2 receptor compared to their corresponding binding affinities with the CB1 receptor. Further structural optimization of 7-AIQD analogs may lead to the identification of potential clinical agents.     

Computational analysis of the CB1 carboxyl‐terminus in the receptor‐G protein complex

Despite the important role of the carboxyl‐terminus (Ct) of the activated brain cannabinoid receptor one (CB1) in the regulation of G protein signaling, a structural understanding of interactions with G proteins is lacking. This is largely due to the highly flexible nature of the CB1 Ct that dynamically adapts its conformation to the presence of G proteins. In the present study, we explored how the CB1 Ct can interact with the G protein by building on our prior modeling of the CB1‐Gi complex (Shim, Ahn, and Kendall, The Journal of Biological Chemistry 2013;288:32449–32465) to incorporate a complete CB1 Ct (Glu416^Ct–Leu472^Ct). Based on the structural constraints from NMR studies, we employed ROSETTA to predict tertiary folds, ZDOCK to predict docking orientation, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to obtain two distinct plausible models of CB1 Ct in the CB1‐Gi complex. The resulting models were consistent with the NMR‐determined helical structure (H9) in the middle region of the CB1 Ct. The CB1 Ct directly interacted with both Gα and Gβ and stabilized the receptor at the Gi interface. The results of site‐directed mutagenesis studies of Glu416^Ct, Asp423^Ct, Asp428^Ct, and Arg444^Ct of CB1 Ct suggested that the CB1 Ct can influence receptor‐G protein coupling by stabilizing the receptor at the Gi interface. This research provided, for the first time, models of the CB1 Ct in contact with the G protein. Proteins 2016; 84:532–543. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

G Protein-regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth (GRIN) modulates Sprouty protein repression of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation by growth factor stimulation

Gα(o/i) interacts directly with GRIN (G protein-regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth). Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we identified Sprouty2 as an interacting partner of GRIN. Gα(o) and Sprouty2 bind to overlapping regions of GRIN, thus competing for GRIN binding. Imaging experiments demonstrated that Gα(o) expression promoted GRIN translocation to the plasma membrane, whereas Sprouty2 expression failed to do so. Given the role of Sprouty2 in the regulation of growth factor-mediated MAPK activation, we examined the contribution of the GRIN-Sprouty2 interaction to CB1 cannabinoid receptor regulation of FGF receptor signaling. In Neuro-2A cells, a system that expresses all of the components endogenously, modulation of GRIN levels led to regulation of MAPK activation. Overexpression of GRIN potentiated FGF activation of MAPK and decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of Sprouty2. Pretreatment with G(o/i)-coupled CB1 receptor agonist attenuated subsequent FGF activation of MAPK. Decreased expression of GRIN both diminished FGF activation of MAPK and blocked CB1R attenuation of MAPK activation. These observations indicate that Gα(o) interacts with GRIN and outcompetes GRIN from bound Sprouty. Free Sprouty then in turn inhibits growth factor signaling. Thus, here we present a novel mechanism of how G(o/i)-coupled receptors can inhibit growth factor signaling to MAPK.     

The conformation of the cytoplasmic helix 8 of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor using NMR and circular dichroism

The cytoplasmic helix domain (fourth cytoplasmic loop, helix 8) of numerous GPCRs such as rhodopsin and the β-adrenergic receptor exhibits unique structural and functional characteristics. Computational models also predict the existence of such a structural motif within the CB1 cannabinoid receptor, another member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. To gain insights into the conformational properties of this GPCR component, a peptide corresponding to helix 8 of the CB1 receptor with a small contiguous segment from transmembrane helix 7 (TM7) was chemically synthesized and its secondary structure determined by circular dichroism (CD) and solution NMR spectroscopy. Our studies in DPC and SDS micelles revealed significant α-helical structure while in an aqueous medium, the peptide exhibited a random coil configuration. The relative orientation of helix 8 within the CB1 receptor was obtained from intermolecular ³¹P-¹H and ¹H-¹H NOE measurements. Our results suggest that in the presence of an amphipathic membrane environment, helix 8 assumes an alpha helical structure with an orientation parallel to the phospholipid membrane surface and perpendicular to TM7. In this model, positively charged side chains interact with the lipid headgroups while the other polar side chains face the aqueous region. The above observations may be relevant to the activation/deactivation of the CB1 receptor.     

Phase I hydroxylated metabolites of the K2 synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018 retain in vitro and in vivo cannabinoid 1 receptor affinity and activity

Background

K2 products are synthetic cannabinoid-laced, marijuana-like drugs of abuse, use of which is often associated with clinical symptoms atypical of marijuana use, including hypertension, agitation, hallucinations, psychosis, seizures and panic attacks. JWH-018, a prevalent K2 synthetic cannabinoid, is structurally distinct from Δ⁹-THC, the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. Since even subtle structural differences can lead to differential metabolism, formation of novel, biologically active metabolites may be responsible for the distinct effects associated with K2 use. The present study proposes that K2''s high adverse effect occurrence is due, at least in part, to distinct JWH-018 metabolite activity at the cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R).

Methods/Principal Findings

JWH-018, five potential monohydroxylated metabolites (M1–M5), and one carboxy metabolite (M6) were examined in mouse brain homogenates containing CB1Rs, first for CB1R affinity using a competition binding assay employing the cannabinoid receptor radioligand [³H]CP-55,940, and then for CB1R intrinsic efficacy using an [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay. JWH-018 and M1–M5 bound CB1Rs with high affinity, exhibiting K_i values that were lower than or equivalent to Δ⁹-THC. These molecules also stimulated G-proteins with equal or greater efficacy relative to Δ⁹-THC, a CB1R partial agonist. Most importantly, JWH-018, M2, M3, and M5 produced full CB1R agonist levels of activation. CB1R-mediated activation was demonstrated by blockade with O-2050, a CB1R-selective neutral antagonist. Similar to Δ⁹-THC, JWH-018 and M1 produced a marked depression of locomotor activity and core body temperature in mice that were both blocked by the CB1R-preferring antagonist/inverse agonist AM251.

Conclusions/Significance

Unlike metabolites of most drugs, the studied JWH-018 monohydroxylated compounds, but not the carboxy metabolite, retain in vitro and in vivo activity at CB1Rs. These observations, combined with higher CB1R affinity and activity relative to Δ⁹-THC, may contribute to the greater prevalence of adverse effects observed with JWH-018-containing products relative to cannabis.     

Design,synthesis and biological evaluation of CB1 cannabinoid receptor ligands derived from the 1,5-diarylpyrazole scaffold

The CB1 receptor belongs to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily. CB1 antagonism has been considered as a new therapeutic target for the treatment of obesity. In this study, we report the synthesis and in vitro binding affinity assay of some 1,5-diarylpyrazole scaffold compounds. The binding results showed that some of the target compounds had an excellent potency toward the CB1 receptor with IC₅₀ values lying at the nanomole level.