AML1/RUNX1 increases during G1 to S cell cycle progression independent of cytokine-dependent phosphorylation and induces cyclin D3 gene expression

AML1/RUNX1, a member of the core binding factor (CBF) family stimulates myelopoiesis and lymphopoiesis by activating lineage-specific genes. In addition, AML1 induces S phase entry in 32Dcl3 myeloid or Ba/F3 lymphoid cells via transactivation. We now found that AML1 levels are regulated during the cell cycle. 32Dcl3 and Ba/F3 cell cycle fractions were prepared using elutriation. Western blotting and a gel shift/supershift assay demonstrated that endogenous CBF DNA binding and AML1 levels were increased 2-4-fold in S and G(2)/M phase cells compared with G(1) cells. In addition, G(1) arrest induced by mimosine reduced AML1 protein levels. In contrast, AML1 RNA did not vary during cell cycle progression relative to actin RNA. Analysis of exogenous Myc-AML1 or AML1-ER demonstrated a significant reduction in G(1) phase cells, whereas levels of exogenous DNA binding domain alone were constant, lending support to the conclusion that regulation of AML1 protein stability contributes to cell cycle variation in endogenous AML1. However, cytokine-dependent AML1 phosphorylation was independent of cell cycle phase, and an AML1 mutant lacking two ERK phosphorylation sites was still cell cycle-regulated. Inhibition of AML1 activity with the CBFbeta-SMMHC or AML1-ETO oncoproteins reduced cyclin D3 RNA expression, and AML1 bound and activated the cyclin D3 promoter. Signals stimulating G(1) to S cell cycle progression or entry into the cell cycle in immature hematopoietic cells might do so in part by inducing AML1 expression, and mutations altering pathways regulating variation in AML1 stability potentially contribute to leukemic transformation.     

Cyclin D1: mechanism and consequence of androgen receptor co-repressor activity.

Androgen receptor regulation is pivotal for prostate growth and development. Activation of the receptor is dictated by association with androgen (ligand) and through interaction with co-activators and co-repressors. We have shown previously that cyclin D1 functions as a co-repressor to inhibit ligand-dependent androgen receptor activation. We demonstrate that cyclin D1 directly binds the N terminus of the androgen receptor and that this interaction is independent of ligand. Furthermore, we show that the interaction occurs in the nucleus and does not require the LXXLL motif of cyclin D1. Although two distinct transactivation domains exist in the N terminus (AF-1 and AF-5), the data shown support the hypothesis that cyclin D1 targets the AF-1 transactivation function. The constitutively active AF-5 domain was refractory to cyclin D1 inhibition. By contrast, cyclin D1 completely abolished androgen receptor activity, even in the presence of potent androgen receptor co-activators. This action of cyclin D1 at least partially required de-acetylase activity. Finally, we show that transient, ectopic expression of cyclin D1 results in reduced cell cycle progression in androgen-dependent LNCaP cells independent of CDK4 association. Collectively, our data support a model wherein cyclin D1 has a mitogenic (CDK4-dependent) function and an anti-mitogenic function (dependent on regulation of the AF-1 domain) that can collectively control the rate of androgen-dependent cellular proliferation. These findings provide insight into the non-cell cycle functions of cyclin D1 and provide the impetus to study its pleiotropic effects in androgen-dependent cells, especially prostatic adenocarcinomas.     

Progesterone inhibits the estrogen-induced phosphoinositide 3-kinase-->AKT-->GSK-3beta-->cyclin D1-->pRB pathway to block uterine epithelial cell proliferation

The mammalian cell cycle is regulated by the cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (pRB) family of proteins. Cyclin D1 with its CDK4/6 partners initiates the cell cycle and acts as the link between extracellular signals and the cell cycle machinery. Estradiol-17beta (E2) stimulates uterine epithelial cell proliferation, a process that is completely inhibited by pretreatment with progesterone (P4). Previously, we identified cyclin D1 localization as a key point of regulation in these cells with E2 causing its nuclear accumulation and P4 retaining it in the cytoplasm with the resultant inhibition of pRB phosphorylation. Here we show that E2 stimulates phosphoinositide 3-kinase to activate phosphokinase B/AKT to effect an inhibitory phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3beta). This pathway is suppressed by P4. Inhibition of the GSK-3beta activity in P4-treated uteri by the specific inhibitor, LiCl, reversed the nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1 and in doing so, caused pRB phosphorylation and the induction of downstream genes, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki67. Conversely, inhibition of phosphoinositide 3 kinase by LY294002 or Wortmanin reversed the E2-induced GSK-3beta Ser9 inhibitory phosphorylation and blocked nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1. These data show the reciprocal actions of E2 and P4 on the phosphoinositide 3-kinase through to the GSK-3beta pathway that in turn regulates cyclin D1 localization and cell cycle progression. These data reveal a novel signaling pathway that links E2 and P4 action to growth factor-mediated signaling in the uterus.     

Natural Pesticide Dihydrorotenone Arrests Human Plasma Cancer Cells at the G0/G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle

Dihydrorotenone (DHR) is a natural pesticide used for farming including organic produces. We recently found that DHR induces human plasma cell apoptosis by provoking endoplasmic reticulum stress. In the present study, we found that DHR arrested human plasma cancer cells at the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. Mechanistical studies demonstrated that cell cycle arrest was associated with downregulated cell cycle promotors including cyclin D2, cyclin D3, cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDK4, CKD6), and phosphorylated‐Rb. DHR inhibited cyclin D2 transactivation, thus inhibiting its mRNA expression. In addition, DHR upregulated the cell cycle repressors p21 and p53. DHR also increased the phosphorylation level of p53, suggesting the upregulated transactivation function of p53, which was confirmed by the induction of p21, a substrate of activated p53. Moreover, DHR downregulated AKT and ERK phosphorylation, an incentive of cell cycle progression. Therefore, these results collectively demonstrated that DHR disrupts the cell cycle progress, which suggests that DHR is toxic to human plasma cells. Caution is thus suggested when handling with this agent.     

G1 cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase-coordinated phosphorylation of endogenous pocket proteins differentially regulates their interactions with E2F4 and E2F1 and gene expression

Mitogenic stimulation leads to activation of G(1) cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which phosphorylate pocket proteins and trigger progression through the G(0)/G(1) and G(1)/S transitions of the cell cycle. However, the individual role of G(1) cyclin-CDK complexes in the coordinated regulation of pocket proteins and their interaction with E2F family members is not fully understood. Here we report that individually or in concert cyclin D1-CDK and cyclin E-CDK complexes induce distinct and coordinated phosphorylation of endogenous pocket proteins, which also has distinct consequences in the regulation of pocket protein interactions with E2F4 and the expression of p107 and E2F1, both E2F-regulated genes. The up-regulation of these two proteins and the release of p130 and pRB from E2F4 complexes allows formation of E2F1 complexes not only with pRB but also with p130 and p107 as well as the formation of p107-E2F4 complexes. The formation of these complexes occurs in the presence of active cyclin D1-CDK and cyclin E-CDK complexes, indicating that whereas phosphorylation plays a role in the abrogation of certain pocket protein/E2F interactions, these same activities induce the formation of other complexes in the context of a cell expressing endogenous levels of pocket and E2F proteins. Of note, phosphorylated p130 "form 3," which does not interact with E2F4, readily interacts with E2F1. Our data also demonstrate that ectopic overexpression of either cyclin is sufficient to induce mitogen-independent growth in human T98G and Rat-1 cells, although the effects of cyclin D1 require downstream activation of cyclin E-CDK2 activity. Interestingly, in T98G cells, cyclin D1 induces cell cycle progression more potently than cyclin E. This suggests that cyclin D1 activates pathways independently of cyclin E that ensure timely progression through the cell cycle.     

Id2 specifically alters regulation of the cell cycle by tumor suppressor proteins.

Cells which are highly proliferative typically lack expression of differentiated, lineage-specific characteristics. Id2, a member of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein family known to inhibit cell differentiation, binds to the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and abolishes its growth-suppressing activity. We found that Id2 but not Id1 or Id3 was able to bind in vitro not only pRb but also the related proteins p107 and p130. Also, an association between Id2 and p107 or p130 was observed in vivo in transiently transfected Saos-2 cells. In agreement with these results, expression of Id1 or Id3 did not affect the block of cell cycle progression mediated by pRb. Conversely, expression of Id2 specifically reversed the cell cycle arrest induced by each of the three members of the pRb family. Furthermore, the growth-suppressive activities of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p16 and p21 were efficiently antagonized by high levels of Id2 but not by Id1 Id3. Consistent with the role of p16 as a selective inhibitor of pRb and pRb-related protein kinase activity, p16-imposed cell cycle arrest was completely abolished by Id2. Only a partial reversal of p21-induced growth suppression was observed, which correlated with the presence of a functional pRb. We also documented decreased levels of cyclin D1 protein and mRNA and the loss of cyclin D1-cdk4 complexes in cells constitutively expressing Id2. These data provide evidence for important Id2-mediated alterations in cell cycle components normally involved in the regulatory events of cell cycle progression, and they highlight a specific role for Id2 as an antagonist of multiple tumor suppressor proteins.     

The Rho GTPase effector ROCK regulates cyclin A, cyclin D1, and p27Kip1 levels by distinct mechanisms

The members of the Rho GTPase family are well known for their regulation of actin cytoskeletal structures. In addition, they influence progression through the cell cycle. The RhoA and RhoC proteins regulate numerous effector proteins, with a central and vital signaling role mediated by the ROCK I and ROCK II serine/threonine kinases. The requirement for ROCK function in the proliferation of numerous cell types has been revealed by studies utilizing ROCK-selective inhibitors such as Y-27632. However, the mechanisms by which ROCK signaling promotes cell cycle progression have not been thoroughly characterized. Using a conditionally activated ROCK-estrogen receptor fusion protein, we found that ROCK activation is sufficient to stimulate G1/S cell cycle progression in NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Further analysis revealed that ROCK acts via independent pathways to alter the levels of cell cycle regulatory proteins: cyclin D1 and p21(Cip1) elevation via Ras and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, increased cyclin A via LIM kinase 2, and reduction of p27(Kip1) protein levels. Therefore, the influence of ROCK on cell cycle regulatory proteins occurs by multiple independent mechanisms.     

Wnt1 and MEK1 cooperate to promote cyclin D1 accumulation and cellular transformation

Members of the Wnt family of signal transducers regulate cellular differentiation/reorganization and cellular proliferation. However, few pro-proliferative targets of Wnt have been identified. We now show that cyclin D1, a critical mediator of cell cycle progression, is a downstream target of Wnt-dependent signaling. NIH-3T3 cell lines engineered to overexpress Wnt1 displayed reduced glycogen synthase kinase-3beta activity. Wnt1-dependent glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibition corresponded with decreased cyclin D1 proteolysis and, thus, hyperaccumulation of active cyclin D1.CDK4 (cyclin-dependent kinase 4) kinase. However, in the absence of serum-derived growth factors, Wnt-1 was not sufficient to drive cyclin D1 accumulation or S-phase entry. In contrast, cells engineered to co-express Wnt1 and activated MEK1 accumulated high levels of cyclin D1 and entered the DNA synthetic phase in the absence of serum-derived growth factors, a characteristic of neoplastic transformation. The ability of a dominant-negative cyclin D1 mutant, D1-T156A, to inhibit Wnt1/MEK1-dependent S-phase entry suggests that cyclin D1 is a critical downstream target for Wnt1- and MEK1-dependent cellular proliferation.     

The protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 is required during angiotensin II-mediated activation of cyclin D1 promoter in CHO-AT1A cells

Angiotensin II (Ang II) binds to specific G protein-coupled receptors and is mitogenic in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing a rat vascular angiotensin II type 1A receptor (CHO-AT(1A)). Cyclin D1 protein expression is regulated by mitogens, and its assembly with the cyclin-dependent kinases induces phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein pRb, a critical step in G(1) to S phase cell cycle progression contributing to the proliferative responses. In the present study, we found that in CHO-AT(1A) cells, Ang II induced a rapid and reversible tyrosine phosphorylation of various intracellular proteins including the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2. Ang II also induced cyclin D1 protein expression in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK)-dependent manner. Using a pharmacological and a co-transfection approach, we found that p21(ras), Raf-1, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and also the catalytic activity of SHP-2 and its Src homology 2 domains are required for cyclin D1 promoter/reporter gene activation by Ang II through the regulation of MAPK/ERK activity. Our findings suggest for the first time that SHP-2 could play an important role in the regulation of a gene involved in the control of cell cycle progression resulting from stimulation of a G protein-coupled receptor independently of epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation.     

Regulation of glioblastoma progression by cord blood stem cells is mediated by downregulation of cyclin D1

Background

The normal progression of the cell cycle requires sequential expression of cyclins. Rapid induction of cyclin D1 and its associated binding with cyclin-dependent kinases, in the presence or absence of mitogenic signals, often is considered a rate-limiting step during cell cycle progression through the G₁ phase.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In the present study, human umbilical cord blood stem cells (hUCBSC) in co-cultures with glioblastoma cells (U251 and 5310) not only induced G₀-G₁ phase arrest, but also reduced the number of cells at S and G₂-M phases of cell cycle. Cell cycle regulatory proteins showed decreased expression levels upon treatment with hUCBSC as revealed by Western and FACS analyses. Inhibition of cyclin D1 activity by hUCBSC treatment is sufficient to abolish the expression levels of Cdk 4, Cdk 6, cyclin B1, β-Catenin levels. Our immuno precipitation experiments present evidence that, treatment of glioma cells with hUCBSC leads to the arrest of cell-cycle progression through inactivation of both cyclin D1/Cdk 4 and cyclin D1/Cdk 6 complexes. It is observed that hUCBSC, when co-cultured with glioma cells, caused an increased G₀-G₁ phase despite the reduction of G₀-G₁ regulatory proteins cyclin D1 and Cdk 4. We found that this reduction of G₀-G₁ regulatory proteins, cyclin D1 and Cdk 4 may be in part compensated by the expression of cyclin E1, when co-cultured with hUCBSC. Co-localization experiments under in vivo conditions in nude mice brain xenografts with cyclin D1 and CD81 antibodies demonstrated, decreased expression of cyclin D1 in the presence of hUCBSC.

Conclusions/Significance

This paper elucidates a model to regulate glioma cell cycle progression in which hUCBSC acts to control cyclin D1 induction and in concert its partner kinases, Cdk 4 and Cdk 6 by mediating cell cycle arrest at G₀-G₁ phase.