Molecular biology of the cell cycle

Genes and cDNA clones have been identified in animal cells that are cell cycle-regulated, i.e. they are preferentially expressed in a phase of the cell cycle. Some of these genes, including four oncogenes, are induced when G0 cells are stimulated to proliferate. Four approaches are described to identify the genes that regulate the transition of cells from a resting to a growing stage. The interrelationship among cell cycle-regulated genes, oncogenes, growth factors and receptors for growth factors points the way to a genetic dissection of cell cycle progression.     

Caveolin-1 expression negatively regulates cell cycle progression by inducing G(0)/G(1) arrest via a p53/p21(WAF1/Cip1)-dependent mechanism

Caveolin-1 is a principal component of caveolae membranes in vivo. Caveolin-1 mRNA and protein expression are lost or reduced during cell transformation by activated oncogenes. Interestingly, the human caveolin-1 gene is localized to a suspected tumor suppressor locus (7q31.1). However, it remains unknown whether caveolin-1 plays any role in regulating cell cycle progression. Here, we directly demonstrate that caveolin-1 expression arrests cells in the G(0)/G(1) phase of the cell cycle. We show that serum starvation induces up-regulation of endogenous caveolin-1 and arrests cells in the G(0)/G(1) phase of the cell cycle. Moreover, targeted down-regulation of caveolin-1 induces cells to exit the G(0)/G(1) phase. Next, we constructed a green fluorescent protein-tagged caveolin-1 (Cav-1-GFP) to examine the effect of caveolin-1 expression on cell cycle regulation. We directly demonstrate that recombinant expression of Cav-1-GFP induces arrest in the G(0)/G(1) phase of the cell cycle. To examine whether caveolin-1 expression is important for modulating cell cycle progression in vivo, we expressed wild-type caveolin-1 as a transgene in mice. Analysis of primary cultures of mouse embryonic fibroblasts from caveolin-1 transgenic mice reveals that caveolin-1 induces 1) cells to exit the S phase of the cell cycle with a concomitant increase in the G(0)/G(1) population, 2) a reduction in cellular proliferation, and 3) a reduction in the DNA replication rate. Finally, we demonstrate that caveolin-1-mediated cell cycle arrest occurs through a p53/p21-dependent pathway. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that caveolin-1 expression plays a critical role in the modulation of cell cycle progression in vivo.     

Activated eIF4E-binding protein slows G1 progression and blocks transformation by c-myc without inhibiting cell growth

Translation initiation is poised between global regulation of cell growth and specific regulation of cell division. The mRNA cap-binding protein (eIF4E) is a critical integrator of cell growth and division because it is rate-limiting for translation initiation and is also rate-limiting for G(1) progression. Translation initiation factor eIF4E is also oncogenic and a candidate target of c-myc. Recently, an activated inhibitory 4E-binding protein (4EBP) that blocks eIF4E was used to study its regulation of Drosophila growth. We adopted this approach in mammalian cells after identifying an autosensing mechanism that protects against increased levels of 4EBP1. Increased 4EBP1 induced a quantitative increase in the inactivated phosphorylated form of 4EBP1 in vitro and in vivo. To overcome this protective mechanism, we introduced alanine substitutions at four phosphorylation/inactivation sites in 4EBP1 to constitutively activate a 4EBP mu to block eIF4E. Overexpression of activated 4EBP mu inhibited cell proliferation and completely blocked transformation by both eIF4E and c-myc, although it did not block all tested oncogenes. Surprisingly, expression of the activated 4EBP mu increased cell size and protein content. Activated 4EBP mu blocked both cell proliferation and c-myc transformation by inhibiting G(1) progression and increasing apoptosis, without decreasing protein synthesis. Our results identify mammalian eIF4E as rate-limiting for cell cycle progression before it regulates cell growth. It further identifies G(1) control by translation initiation factors as an essential genetic target of c-myc that is necessary for its ability to transform cells.     

Jumonji/ARID1 B (JARID1B) protein promotes breast tumor cell cycle progression through epigenetic repression of microRNA let-7e

MicroRNAs (miRs) function as tumor suppressors or oncogenes in multiple tumor types. Although miR expression is tightly regulated, the molecular basis of miR regulation is poorly understood. Here, we investigated the influence of the histone demethylase Jumonji/ARID1 B (JARID1B) on miR regulation in breast tumor cells. In MCF-7 cells with stable RNAi-mediated suppression of JARID1B expression we identified altered regulation of multiple miRs including let-7e, a member of the let-7 family of tumor suppressor miRs. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated JARID1B binding to the let-7e promoter region as well as removal of the of H3K4me3 histone mark associated with active gene expression. These results suggest that JARID1B epigenetically represses let-7e expression. JARID1B stimulates tumor cell proliferation by promoting the G(1) to S transition. As predicted, suppression of JARID1B resulted in an accumulation of MCF-7 cells in G(1). We confirmed that cyclin D1, which also promotes G(1) progression, is a direct target of let-7e, and we show that cyclin D1 expression is suppressed in JARID1B knockdown cells. Cyclin D1 expression and cell cycle progression were restored following inhibition of let-7e, suggesting that JARID1B repression of let-7e contributes to cyclin D1 expression and JARID1B-mediated cell cycle progression. Our results indicate that the JARID1B demethylase contributes to tumor cell proliferation through the epigenetic repression of a tumor suppressor miR.     

Oncogenes result in genomic alterations that activate a transcriptionally silent, dominantly selectable reporter gene (neo).

Although oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have been implicated in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, their relationship to the development of genomic instability has not been elucidated. To examine this role, we transfected oncogenes (polyomavirus middle [Py] and large T [MT and LT]) and adenovirus serotype 5 E1A) into two NIH 3T3-derived cell lines, EN/NIH 2-4 and EN/NIH 2-20. Both cell lines contain two stable integrants of a variant of the retrovirus vector pZipNeoSV(x)1 that has been modified by deletion of the enhancer elements from the long terminal repeats. DNA rearrangements activating the silent neomycin phosphotransferase gene (neo) present in these integrants were identified by selection of cells in the antibiotic G418. Whereas control-transfected EN/NIH cell lines do not yield G418-resistant subclones (GRSs), a fraction of oncogene-transfected EN/NIH 2-4 (8 of 19 Py MT, 5 of 17 Py LT, and 11 of 19 E1A) and 2-20 (7 of 15 Py MT) cell lines gave rise to GRSs at differing frequencies (0.33 x 10(-6) to 46 x 10(-6) for line 2-4 versus 0.11 x 10(-6) to 1.3 x 10(-6) for line 2-20) independent of cell generation time. In contrast, a distinctly smaller fraction of mutant Py MT-transfected EN/NIH cell lines (1 of 10 MT23, 1 of 10 MT1015, and 0 of 10 MT59b) resulted in GRSs. Southern analysis of DNA from selected oncogene-transfected GRSs demonstrated genomic rearrangements of neo-containing cellular DNA that varied in type (amplification and/or novel fragments) and frequency depending on the specific oncogene and EN/NIH cell line used in transfection. Furthermore, only one of the two neo-containing genomic loci present in both EN/NIH cell lines appeared to be involved in these genomic events. In addition to effects related to the genomic locus, these observations support a role for oncogenes in the development of genetic changes associated with tumor progression.     

Increased G2 delay in radiation-resistant cells obtained by transformation of primary rat embryo cells with the oncogenes H-ras and v-myc

Cell cycle perturbation after irradiation was studied in five cell lines transfected with oncogenes. Two immortalized, radio-sensitive cell lines with D0s of 1.06 and 1.08 Gy were compared to three radioresistant cell lines with D0s of 1.68-2.17 Gy. The sensitive cell lines were transfected with the v-myc or c-myc oncogenes, the resistant cell lines with the v-myc plus H-ras oncogenes. Exponentially growing populations were exposed to 5, 10, or 15 Gy of orthovoltage radiation. The percentage of cells in each phase of the cell cycle was determined at various times after irradiation using flow cytometry. All cell lines underwent a dose-dependent arrest in G2 phase after irradiation, but the resistant cell lines underwent a significantly longer arrest in G2 phase after irradiation than did the sensitive cell lines. In conjunction with other results from our laboratories, we suggest that this difference in G2 arrest may be the basis for the increased resistance of cells transfected with oncogenes to irradiation.     

Oncogene expression cloning by retroviral transduction of adenovirus E1A-immortalized rat kidney RK3E cells: transformation of a host with epithelial features by c-MYC and the zinc finger protein GKLF.

The function of several known oncogenes is restricted to specific host cells in vitro, suggesting that new genes may be identified by using alternate hosts. RK3E cells exhibit characteristics of epithelia and are susceptible to transformation by the G protein RAS and the zinc finger protein GLI. Expression cloning identified the major transforming activities in squamous cell carcinoma cell lines as c-MYC and the zinc finger protein gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor (GKLF)/epithelial zinc finger. In oral squamous epithelium, GKLF expression was detected in the upper, differentiating cell layers. In dysplastic epithelium, expression was prominently increased and was detected diffusely throughout the entire epithelium, indicating that GKLF is misexpressed in the basal compartment early during tumor progression. The results demonstrate transformation of epithelioid cells to be a sensitive and specific assay for oncogenes activated during tumorigenesis in vivo, and identify GKLF as an oncogene that may function as a regulator of proliferation or differentiation in epithelia.     

Insights into the G1/S transition in plants

The G1/S transition generally represents the principal point of commitment to cell division. Many of the components of the cell cycle core machinery regulating the G1/S transition in plants have been recently identified. Although plant regulators of the G1/S transition display structural and biochemical homologies with their animal counterparts, their functions in integrating environmental stimuli and the developmental program within cell cycle progression are often plant-specific. In this review, recent progress in understanding the role of plant G1/S transition regulators is presented. Emerging evidence concerning the mechanisms of G1/S control in response to factors triggering the cell cycle and the integration of these mechanisms with plant development is also discussed.     

Insulin delays the progression of Drosophila cells through G2/M by activating the dTOR/dRaptor complex

In Drosophila and mammals, insulin signalling can increase growth, progression through G1/S, cell size and tissue size. Here, we analyse the way insulin affects cell size and cell-cycle progression in two haemocyte-derived Drosophila cell lines. Surprisingly, we find that although insulin increases cell size, it slows the rate at which these cells increase in number. By using BrdU pulse-chase to label S-phase cells and follow their progression through the cell cycle, we show that insulin delays progression through G2/M, thereby slowing cell division. The ability of insulin to slow progression through G2/M is independent of its ability to stimulate progression through G1/S, so is not a consequence of feedback by the cell-cycle machinery to maintain cell-cycle length. Insulin's effects on progression through G2/M are mediated by dTOR/dRaptor signalling. Partially inhibiting dTOR/dRaptor signalling by dsRNAi or mild rapamycin treatment can increase cell number in cultured haemocytes and the Drosophila wing, respectively. Thus, insulin signalling can influence cell number depending on a balance between its ability to accelerate progression through G1/S and delay progression through G2/M.     

Defining the molecular mechanisms of human cell immortalization.

Although the immortalization of human cells is a key step in oncogenic progression, the molecular mechanisms underlying this event are poorly understood. After reviewing the use of chemicals, physical agents, oncogenes and DNA tumor viruses as immortalizing agents, we consider the importance of negative regulators of cell growth (RB and p53), their inactivation, as well as genomic instability in the pathogenesis of cancer. Finally, a molecular model for human cell immortalization that integrates many of the above observations is presented along with supporting evidence.     

Ras-mediated cell cycle arrest is altered by nuclear oncogenes to induce Schwann cell transformation.

The cellular responses to ras and nuclear oncogenes were investigated in purified populations of rat Schwann cells. v-Ha-ras and SV40 large T cooperate to transform Schwann cells, inducing growth in soft agar and allowing proliferation in the absence of added mitogens. Expression of large T alone reduces their growth factor requirements but is insufficient to induce full transformation. In contrast, expression of v-Ha-ras leads to proliferation arrest in Schwann cells expressing a temperature-sensitive mutant of large T at the restrictive temperature. Cells arrest in either the G1 or G2/M phases of the cell cycle, and can re-enter cell division at the permissive temperature even after prolonged periods at the restrictive conditions. Oncogenic ras proteins also inhibit DNA synthesis when microinjected into Schwann cells. Adenovirus E1a and c-myc oncogenes behave similarly to SV40 large T. They cooperate with Ha-ras oncogenes to transform Schwann cells, and prevent ras-induced growth arrest. Thus nuclear oncogenes fundamentally alter the response of Schwann cells to a ras oncogene from cell cycle arrest to transformation.     

Control of the yeast cell cycle is associated with assembly/disassembly of the Cdc28 protein kinase complex

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene CDC28 encodes a protein kinase required for progression from G1 to S phase in the cell cycle. We present evidence that the active form of the Cdc28 protein kinase is a complex of approximately 160 kd containing an endogenous substrate, p40, and possibly other polypeptides. This complex phosphorylates p40 and exogenous histone H1 in vitro. Cell cycle arrest during G1 results in inactivation of the protein kinase accompanied by the disassembly of the complex. Furthermore, assembly of the complex is regulated during the cell cycle, reaching a maximum during G1. Partial complexes thought to be intermediates in the assembly process phosphorylate histone H1 but not p40. Addition of soluble factors to these partial complexes in vitro restores p40 phosphorylation and causes the complex to increase to the mature size. A model is presented in which p40 phosphorylation is required during G1 for cells to initiate a new cell cycle.     

New insights into the kinetic resistance to anticancer agents

Kinetic resistance plays a major role in the failure of chemotherapy towards many solid tumors. Kinetic resistance to cytotoxic drugs can be reproduced in vitro by growing the cells as multicellular spheroids (Multicellular Resistance) or as hyperconfluent cultures (Confluence-Dependent Resistance). Recent findings on the cell cycle regulation have permitted a better understanding why cancer cells which arrest in long quiescent phases are poorly sensitive to cell-cycle specific anticancer drugs. Two cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKI) seem particularly involved in the cell cycle arrest at the G1 to S transition checkpoint: the p53-dependent p21^cip1 protein which is activated by DNA damage and the p27^kip1 which is a mediator of the contact inhibition signal. Cell quiescence could alter drug-induced apoptosis which is partly dependent on an active progression in the cell cycle and which is facilitated by overexpression of oncogenes such as c-Myc or cyclins. Investigations are yet necessary to determine the influence of the cell cycle on the balance between antagonizing (bcl-2, bcl-X_L...) or stimulating (Bax, Bcl-X_S, Fas...) factors in chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Quiescent cells could also be protected from toxic agents by an enhanced expression of stress proteins, such as HSP27 which is induced by confluence. New strategies are required to circumvent kinetic resistance of solid tumors: adequate choice of anticancer agents whose activity is not altered by quiescence (radiation, cisplatin), recruitment from G1 to S/G2 phases by cell pretreatment with alkylating drugs or attenuation of CDKI activity by specific inhibitors. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

High resolution analysis of cell cycle-correlated vimentin expression in asynchronously grown,TPA-treated MPC-11 cells by the novel flow cytometric multiparameter BrdU-hoechst/PI and immunolabeling technique

High resolution, multiparameter analysis using the flow cytometric BrdU/Hoechst quenching technique has been applied to study cell cycle kinetics and vimentin expression in individual cells of asynchronously grown MPC-11 mouse plasmacytoma cell cultures treated with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) to induce in vitro differentiation. BrdU treatment up to 16 h in the absence or presence of TPA did not affect either cell cycle progression or the kinetics or quantity of vimentin expression. TPA-treated cells became arrested in G1 phase of the second cell cycle; however, this G1 phase arrest was transient only. In addition, G1 phase cells located prior to a putative transition point at the beginning of TPA treatment were completely blocked in cell cycle progression. There is also evidence that cells located in G1 or G2/M phase at the beginning of TPA treatment finally expressed low levels of vimentin. On the contrary, cells located in S phase at TPA exposure showed high vimentin levels after treatment. The results presented here show that, with the flow cytometric BrdU/Hoechst quenching technique, one can correlate time-dependent protein expression at the single cell level in asynchronously grown cultures not only with the actual cell cycle state, but also with the history of cell replication. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Effects of 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine on the cell cycle in the human leukemia EHEB cell line

To explain why 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine (CdA) is unable to block DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression, and paradoxically enhances progression from G1 into S phase in the CdA-resistant leukemia EHEB cell line, we studied its metabolism and effects on proteins regulating the transition from G1 to S phase. A low deoxycytidine kinase activity and CdATP accumulation, and a lack of p21 induction despite p53 phosphorylation and accumulation may account for the inability of CdA to block the cell cycle. An alternative pathway involving pRb phosphorylation seems implicated in the CdA-induced increase in G1 to S phase progression.     

Growth regulation by oncogenes--new insights from model organisms

A great deal of work has focused on how oncogenes regulate the cell cycle during normal development and in cancer, yet their roles in regulating cell growth have been largely unexplored. Recent work in several model organisms has demonstrated that homologs of several oncogenes regulate cell growth and has suggested that some of the effects of oncogenes on the cell cycle may be a result of growth promotion. These studies have also suggested how growth and cell-cycle progression may be coupled.