Insights into mu opioid pharmacology the role of mu opioid receptor subtypes

Although mu opioids share many pharmacological characteristics, they also reveal many differences. Many approaches over the years have suggested the existence of multiple mu opioid receptors. The unique selectivities of naloxonazine, for example, provided a way of distinguishing mu, from mu2 actions. Studies of morphine-6beta-gluruconide suggested that its actions involved yet another mu opioid receptor subtype. The cloning of a mu opioid receptor, MOR-1, provided a way of exploring this possibility at the molecular level. Recent studies have now identified a number of splice variants of this gene that appear to be important in the production of mu opioid analgesia.     

Role for the C-terminus in agonist-induced mu opioid receptor phosphorylation and desensitization

Determining which domains and amino acid residues of the mu opioid receptor are phosphorylated is critical for understanding the mechanism of mu opioid receptor phosphorylation. The role of the C-terminus of the receptor was investigated by examining the C-terminally truncated or point-mutated mu opioid receptors in receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. Both wild-type and mutated receptors were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The receptor expression was confirmed by receptor radioligand binding and immunoblottting. After exposure to 5 microM of DAMGO, phosphorylation of the C-terminally truncated receptor and the mutant receptor T394A was reduced to 40 and 10% of that of the wild-type receptor, respectively. Mutation effects on agonist-induced desensitization were studied using adenylyl cyclase inhibition assays. The C-terminally truncated receptor and mutant receptor T394A both showed complete loss of DAMGO-induced desensitization, while the mutant T/S-7A receptor only lost part of its ability to desensitize. Taken together, these results suggest that the C-terminus of the mu opioid receptor participates in receptor phosphorylation and desensitization with threonine 394, a crucial residue for both features. DAMGO-induced mu opioid receptor phosphorylation and desensitization are associated and appear to involve both the mu opioid receptor C-terminus and other domains of the receptor.     

Upregulation of opioid receptor subtypes correlates with potency changes of morphine and DADLE

Chronic treatment with opioid antagonists increases the potency of opioid agonists and produces an increase in brain opioid binding sites. In the present study, 8 day treatment with naltrexone blocked morphine and DADLE analgesia for the entire treatment period and increased mu 1, mu 2 and delta opioid receptor binding sites in mouse brain. mu 1 and mu 2 binding were increased by 81 and 67%, respectively, while delta binding was increased by 31%. Consistent with these binding changes, the potency of ICV morphine to produce analgesia was increased by over 3-fold, while the potency of ICV DADLE was increased by only 1.7. These findings indicate that relative increases in opioid receptor subtypes agree with pharmacodynamic studies on potency changes of opioid agonists.     

14-O-Heterocyclic-substituted naltrexone derivatives as non-peptide mu opioid receptor selective antagonists: Design,synthesis, and biological studies

Mu opioid receptor antagonists have clinical utility and are important research tools. To develop non-peptide and highly selective mu opioid receptor antagonist, a series of 14-O-heterocyclic-substituted naltrexone derivatives were designed, synthesized, and evaluated. These compounds showed subnanomolar-to-nanomolar binding affinity for the mu opioid receptor. Among them, compound 1 exhibited the highest selectivity for the mu opioid receptor over the delta and kappa receptors. These results implicated an alternative ‘address’ domain in the extracellular loops of the mu opioid receptor.     

Involvement of opioid receptor subtypes in rat feeding behavior

The short-acting opiate antagonist naloxone decreases food intake in three models of ingestive behavior: free feeding, food-deprivation induced feeding and deoxyglucose-induced feeding. Twenty-four hours after administration, the long-acting, mu1 selective antagonist naloxonazine inhibits food intake to the same extent as naloxone in freely feeding and food-deprived rats, but not in animals treated with 2-deoxyglucose. These results indicate that 1) opiates modulate feeding through multiple opioid receptor mechanisms, one of which is the mu subtype, and 2) the feeding observed in various experimental paradigms are modulated by different receptor subtypes. Furthermore, these results illustrate the usefulness of naloxone in defining a behavior as opioid but point out its limitations in discriminating between opioid receptor subtypes.     

Diversity and complexity of the mu opioid receptor gene: alternative pre-mRNA splicing and promoters

Mu opioid receptors play an important role in mediating the actions of a class of opioids including morphine and heroin. Binding and pharmacological studies have proposed several mu opioid receptor subtypes: mu(1), mu(2), and morphine-6beta-glucuronide (M6G). The cloning of a mu opioid receptor, MOR-1, has provided an invaluable tool to explore pharmacological and physiological functions of mu opioid receptors at the molecular level. However, only one mu opioid receptor (Oprm) gene has been isolated. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing has been proposed as a molecular explanation for the existence of pharmacologically identified subtypes. In recent years, we have extensively investigated alternative splicing of the Oprm gene, particularly of the mouse Oprm gene. So far we have identified 25 splice variants from the mouse Oprm gene, which are controlled by two diverse promoters, eight splice variants from the rat Oprm gene, and 11 splice variants from the human Oprm gene. Diversity and complexity of the Oprm gene was further demonstrated by functional differences in agonist-induced G protein activation, adenylyl cyclase activity, and receptor internalization among carboxyl terminal variants. This review summarizes these recent results and provides a new perspective on understanding and exploring complex opioid actions in animals and humans.     

Comparison of opioid receptor distributions in the rat central nervous system

The opioid receptors, mu, delta and kappa, conduct the major pharmacological effects of opioid drugs, and exhibit intriguing functional relationships and interactions in the CNS. Previously established hypotheses regarding the mechanisms underlying these phenomena specify theoretical patterns of relative cellular localisation for the different receptor types. In this study, we have used double-label immunohistochemistry to compare the cellular distributions of delta and kappa receptors with those of mu receptors in the rat CNS. Regions of established significance in opioid addiction were examined. Extensive mu/delta co-localisation was observed in neuron-like cells in several regions. mu and kappa receptors were also often co-localised in neuron-like cell bodies in several regions. However, intense kappa immunoreactivity (ir) also appeared in a separate, morphologically distinct population of cells that did not express mu receptors. These small, ovoid cells were often closely apposed against the larger, mu-ir cell bodies. Such cellular appositions were seen in several regions, but were particularly common in the medial thalamus, the periaqueductal grey and brainstem regions. These findings support proposals that functional similarities, synergy and cooperativity between mu and delta receptors arise from widespread co-expression by cells and intracellular molecular interactions. Although co-expression of mu and kappa receptors was also detected, the appearance of a separate population of kappa-expressing cells supports proposals that the contrasting and functionally antagonistic properties of mu and kappa receptors are due to expression in physiologically distinct cell types. Greater understanding of opioid receptor interaction mechanisms may provide possibilities for therapeutic intervention in opioid addiction and other conditions.     

Disruption of the mu-delta opioid receptor heteromer

The crystal structure of the mu and kappa opioid receptors has revealed dimeric structural arrangements. Mu-delta receptors heteromers also exist and we have identified discrete cytoplasmic regions in each receptor required for oligomer formation. In the carboxyl tail of the delta receptor we identified three glycine residues (-GGG), substitution of any of these residues prevented heteromer formation. In intracellular loop 3 of both mu and delta receptors we identified three residues (-SVR), substitution of any of these residues prevented heteromer formation.     

MAP kinase activation by mu opioid receptor involves phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase but not the cAMP/PKA pathway.

The involvement of protein kinases was studied in mu opioid receptor activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase using cells transfected with the receptor clone. The cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway is known to be the major biochemical pathway for mu opioid receptor signaling. However, our data showed that stimulating adenylyl cyclase or activating PKA had no effect on mu receptor enhancement of MAP kinase activity, suggesting that the cAMP/PKA pathway is not involved in mediating the mu receptor activation of MAP kinase. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase reduced mu receptor enhancement of MAP kinase activity, suggesting PI 3-kinase involvement. Together, these results show that cross-talk between the mu opioid receptor and the MAP kinase cascade is not mediated by the cAMP/PKA pathway, but involves PI 3-kinase.     

Mu opioid receptor: a gateway to drug addiction

Mu opioid receptors mediate positive reinforcement following direct (morphine) or indirect (alcohol, cannabinoids, nicotine) activation, and our understanding of mu receptor function is central to the development of addiction therapies. Recent data obtained in native neurons confirm that mu receptor signaling and regulation are strongly agonist-dependent. Current functional mapping reveals morphine-activated neurons in the extended amygdala and early genomic approaches have identified novel mu receptor-associated proteins. A classification of about 30 genes either promoting or counteracting the addictive properties of morphine is proposed from the analysis of knockout mice data. The targeting of effectors or regulatory proteins, beyond the mu receptor itself, might provide valuable strategies to treat addictive disorders.     

Constitutive activity of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor regulates the function of co-expressed Mu opioid receptors

The human mu opioid receptor was expressed stably in Flp-In T-REx HEK293 cells. Occupancy by the agonist DAMGO (Tyr-d-Ala-Gly-N-methyl-Phe-Gly-ol) resulted in phosphorylation of the ERK1/2 MAP kinases, which was blocked by the opioid antagonist naloxone but not the cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonist SR141716A. Expression of the human cannabinoid CB1 receptor in these cells from the inducible Flp-In T-REx locus did not alter expression levels of the mu opioid receptor. This allowed the cannabinoid CB1 agonist WIN55212-2 to stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation but resulted in a large reduction in the capacity of DAMGO to activate these kinases. Although lacking affinity for the mu opioid receptor, co-addition of SR141716A caused recovery of the effectiveness of DAMGO. In contrast co-addition of the CB1 receptor neutral antagonist O-2050 did not. Induction of the CB1 receptor also resulted in an increase of basal [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding and thereby a greatly reduced capacity of DAMGO to further stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. CB1 inverse agonists attenuated basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and restored the capacity of DAMGO to stimulate. Flp-In T-REx HEK293 cells were generated, which express the human mu opioid receptor constitutively and harbor a modified D163N cannabinoid CB1 receptor that lacks constitutive activity. Induction of expression of the modified cannabinoid CB1 receptor did not limit DAMGO-mediated ERK1/2 MAP kinase phosphorylation and did not allow SR141716A to enhance the function of DAMGO. These data indicate that it is the constitutive activity inherent in the cannabinoid CB1 receptor that reduces the capacity of co-expressed mu opioid receptor to function.     

Impedance-based analysis of mu opioid receptor signaling and underlying mechanisms

The mu opioid receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor able to signal through the Gα_i/o class of G-protein and β-arrestin pathways, stimulating down-stream effector pathways. Signaling bias occurs when different receptor agonists lead to different signaling outcomes. Traditionally these have been studied using end-point assays. Real-time cellular analysis platforms allow for the analysis of the holistic effects of receptor activation as an integrated output. While this allows for different ligands to be compared rapidly, the cellular mechanisms underlying the signal are not well described. Using an impedance based system, the impedance responses for two opioid ligands, morphine and DAMGO were examined.The impedance responses for these two agonists, while showing similar features, were distinct from each other. Some of the mechanisms underlying the mu opioid receptor coupled impedance changes were investigated. It was found that the response is a result of discrete cellular processes, including G-protein signaling and protein kinase phosphorylation.     

Biotinylated human beta-endorphins as probes for the opioid receptor

The reaction of human beta-endorphin and biotinyl N-hydroxysuccinimide with or without spacer arm, afforded a series of products that were separated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Liquid secondary ion mass spectrometry of the biotinylated products and their tryptic digests produced abundant protonated molecular ions (MH+), which specified the number and location of biotinylation. Between 1 and 4 biotinyl residues were incorporated per human beta-endorphin molecule, at Lys-9, -19, -24, -28, and -29, but not at the amino-terminal Tyr-1. Three HPLC fractions were isolated for receptor binding studies with monobiotinylation of Lys-9 (B1 beta and B1X beta; X = C6 spacer arm), Lys-19 (B1 gamma), and a mixture of Lys-24, Lys-28, and Lys-29 derivatives (B1 alpha, BX1 alpha). All derivatives displayed tight binding to avidin, and no dissociation from avidin was detectable over several hours at 0 degrees C for the derivatives (BX1 alpha) tested. IC50 values for binding to mu and delta opioid receptor sites were 3-8 times higher for monobiotinylated derivatives than for the parent human beta-endorphin (IC50,mu = 1.5 nM, IC50,delta = 1.3 nM). Association with avidin decreased opioid receptor affinities for the C6 spacer derivative biotinylated at position Lys-9, which is close to the (1-5) enkephalin receptor region. In contrast, avidin did not affect or even increased apparent affinities to mu and delta sites for derivatives biotinylated at the alpha-helical part of the molecule (Lys-19, -24, -28, and -29). Thus, when bound to avidin, the biotinylated human beta-endorphin derivatives with spacer arm (BX1 alpha), substituted near the carboxyl terminal (Lys-24, -28, and -29), displayed mu binding affinities equal to and delta binding affinities only four times lower than underivatized human beta-endorphin. Biotinylated human beta-endorphins also bound to low affinity nonopioid binding sites on NG-108-15 cells; however, affinities to these sites were considerably reduced when derivatives were bound to avidin. The ability of biotinylated human beta-endorphin to cross-link the mu and delta opioid receptors to avidin allows application of the biotin-avidin system as a molecular probe of the opioid receptor.     

Identification of an opioid receptor subunit carrying the mu binding site

The enkephalin affinity reagent [3H]Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Phe-Leu-CH2Cl [( 3H]DALECK) was synthesized. It exhibited high-affinity reversible binding, at pH 7.4, to both mu and delta opioid receptor sites in rat brain membranes. At pH 8.1, nanomolar levels of [3H]DALECK produced an irreversible labeling in synaptic membranes, essentially only in one subunit of 58 000 daltons. The irreversible phase of the reaction reduced the subsequent binding of a mu-selective enkephalin derivative but not that of a delta-selective one. It is concluded that a mu subunit of the opioid receptor exists, can be alkylated specifically, and is of Mr 58 000.     

Structure-activity relationship studies of carboxamido-biaryl ethers as opioid receptor antagonists (OpRAs). Part 1

A structurally unique and new class of opioid receptor antagonists (OpRAs) that bear no structural resemblance with morphine or endogenous opioid peptides has been discovered. A series of carboxamido-biaryl ethers were identified as potent receptor antagonists against mu, kappa and delta opioid receptors. The structure-activity relationship indicated para-substituted aryloxyaryl primary carboxamide bearing an amine tether on the distal phenyl ring was optimal for potent in vitro functional antagonism against three opioid receptor subtypes.     

Modifications of the cyclic mu receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et): effects on opioid receptor binding and activation.

The previously described cyclic mu opioid receptor-selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et) (JOM-6) was modified at residues 1 and 3 by substitution with various natural and synthetic amino acids, and/or by alteration of the cyclic system. Effects on mu and delta opioid receptor binding affinities, and on potencies and efficacies as measured by the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay, were evaluated. Affinities at mu and delta receptors were not influenced dramatically by substitution of Tyr1 with conformationally restricted phenolic amino acids. In the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay, all of the peptides tested exhibited a maximal response comparable with that of fentanyl at the mu opioid receptor, and all showed high potency, in the range 0.4-9nM. However, potency changes did not always correlate with affinity, suggesting that the conformation required for binding and the conformation required for activation of the opioid receptors are different. At the delta opioid receptor, none of the peptides were able to produce a response equivalent to that of the full delta agonist BW 373,U86 and only one had an EC50 value of less than 100nM. Lastly, we have identified a peptide, D-Hat-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et), with high potency and > 1,000-fold functional selectivity for the mu over delta opioid receptor as measured by the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay.     

Proteasome involvement in agonist-induced down-regulation of mu and delta opioid receptors

This study investigated the mechanism of agonist-induced opioid receptor down-regulation. Incubation of HEK 293 cells expressing FLAG-tagged delta and mu receptors with agonists caused a time-dependent decrease in opioid receptor levels assayed by immunoblotting. Pulse-chase experiments using [(35)S]methionine metabolic labeling indicated that the turnover rate of delta receptors was accelerated 5-fold following agonist stimulation. Inactivation of functional G(i) and G(o) proteins by pertussis toxin-attenuated down-regulation of the mu opioid receptor, while down-regulation of the delta opioid receptor was unaffected. Pretreatment of cells with inhibitors of lysosomal proteases, calpain, and caspases had little effect on mu and delta opioid receptor down-regulation. In marked contrast, pretreatment with proteasome inhibitors attenuated agonist-induced mu and delta receptor down-regulation. In addition, incubation of cells with proteasome inhibitors in the absence of agonists increased steady-state mu and delta opioid receptor levels. Immunoprecipitation of mu and delta opioid receptors followed by immunoblotting with ubiquitin antibodies suggested that preincubation with proteasome inhibitors promoted accumulation of polyubiquitinated receptors. These data provide evidence that the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway plays a role in agonist-induced down-regulation and basal turnover of opioid receptors.