Site-specific mutations in the myosin binding sites of actin affect structural transitions that control myosin binding.

We have examined the effects of actin mutations on myosin binding, detected by cosedimentation, and actin structural dynamics, detected by spectroscopic probes. Specific mutations were chosen that have been shown to affect the functional interactions of actin and myosin, two mutations (4Ac and E99A/E100A) in the proposed region of weak binding to myosin and one mutation (I341A) in the proposed region of strong binding. In the absence of nucleotide and salt, S1 bound to both wild-type and mutant actins with high affinity (K(d) < microM), but either ADP or increased ionic strength decreased this affinity. This decrease was more pronounced for actins with mutations that inhibit functional interaction with myosin (E99A/E100A and I341A) than for a mutation that enhances the interaction (4Ac). The mutations E99A/E100A and I341A affected the microsecond time scale dynamics of actin in the absence of myosin, but the 4Ac mutation did not have any effect. The binding of myosin eliminated these effects of mutations on structural dynamics; i.e., the spectroscopic signals from mutant actins bound to S1 were the same as those from wild-type actin. These results indicate that mutations in the myosin binding sites affect structural transitions within actin that control strong myosin binding, without affecting the structural dynamics of the strongly bound actomyosin complex.     

The C-terminal helix in subdomain 4 of the regulatory light chain is essential for myosin regulation.

In vertebrate smooth/non-muscle myosins, phosphorylation of the regulatory light chains by a specific calmodulin-activated kinase controls both myosin head interaction with actin and assembly of the myosin into filaments. Previous studies have shown that the C-terminal domain of the regulatory light chain is crucial for the regulation of these myosin functions. To further dissect the role of this region of the light chain in myosin regulation, a series of chicken smooth muscle myosin regulatory light chain mutants has been constructed with successive C-terminal deletions. These mutants were synthesized in Escherichia coli and analysed by their ability to restore Ca2+ regulation to scallop myosin that had been stripped of its native regulatory light chains ('desensitized'). The results show that regulatory light chain mutants with deletions in the C-terminal helix in subdomain 4 were able to reform the regulatory Ca2+ binding site on the scallop myosin head, but had lost the ability to suppress scallop myosin filament assembly and interaction with actin in the absence of Ca2+. Further deletions in the C-terminal domain led to a gradual loss of ability to restore the regulatory Ca2+ binding site. Thus, the regions in the C-terminal half of the regulatory light chain responsible for myosin regulation can be identified.     

Interaction of nonpolymerizable actins with myosin.

Polymerization of G-actin in the presence of salt and phalloidin was blocked by treatment of G-actin with m-maleimidobenzoic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS) (designated as m-actin). The actin dimer produced by chemical crosslinking of F-actin with N,N'-p-phenylenedimaleimide did not polymerize and was still dimeric or tetrameric after further treatment with MBS (designated as d-actin). The m- and d-actins retained the ability to bind to myosin heads with apparent dissociation constants of 3-8 x 10(-6) and 3-5 x 10(-7) M, respectively. d-Actin formed a 1:1 actin monomer-myosin head complex. However, m-actin formed a 2:1 m-actin-head complex, suggesting the presence of at least two latent actin-binding sites on a myosin head. ATP weakens only 2- to 6-fold the binding of these complexes. One of two m-actins on a myosin head was replaced by d-actin. Native F-actin blocked the binding of both m- and d-actins to myosin heads in the presence and absence of ATP, although the affinities of myosin head for MBS-treated actins and F-actin are similar in the presence of ATP. These results suggest that there are at least three actin binding sites on a myosin head: one is responsible for binding of F-, m-, and d-actins, the second for binding of F- and m-actins, and the third for binding of F-actin at least in the presence of ATP. F-Actin binding to the third site may in some way block the first and second binding sites.     

Three-dimensional reconstruction of thin filaments decorated with a Ca2+-regulated myosin

Three-dimensional reconstructions of “barbed” and “blunted” arrowheads (Craig et al., 1980) show that these two forms arise from arrangement of scallop myosin subfragments (S1) that appear about 40 Å longer in the presence of the regulatory light chain than in its absence. A similar difference in apparent length is indicated by images of single myosin subfragments in partially decorated filaments. The extra mass is located at the end of the subfragment furthest from actin, and probably comprises part of the regulatory light chain as well as a segment of the myosin heavy chain. The fact that barbed arrowheads are also formed by myosin subfragments from vertebrate striated and smooth muscles implies that the homologous light chains in these myosins have locations similar to that of the scallop light chain.The scallop light chain probably does not extend into the actin-binding site on the myosin head, and is therefore unlikely to interfere physically with binding. Rather, regulation of actin-myosin interaction by light chains may involve Ca²⁺-dependent changes in the structure of a region near the head-tail junction of myosin.The reconstructions suggest locations for actin and tropomyosin relative to myosin that are similar to those proposed by Taylor & Amos (1981) and are consistent with a revised steric blocking model for regulation by tropomyosin. The identification of actin from these reconstructions is supported by images of partially decorated filaments that display the polarity of the actin helix relative to that of bound myosin subfragments.     

Mechanism of formation of actomyosin interface

Force generation in muscle results from binding of myosin to F-actin. ATP binding to myosin provides energy to dissociate actomyosin complex while the hydrolysis of ATP is needed for re-binding of myosin to F-actin. At the end of each cycle myosin and actin form a tight complex with a substantial interface area. We investigated the dynamics of formation of actomyosin interface in presence and absence of nucleotides by quenched flow cross-linking technique. We showed previously that myosin head (subfragment 1, S1) directly interacts with at least two monomers in the actin filament. The quenched flow cross-linking experiments revealed that the initial contact (in presence or absence of nucleotides) occurs between loop 635-647 of S1 and 1-12 N-terminal residues of one actin and, then, the second contact forms between loop 567-574 of S1 and the N terminus of the second actin. The distance between these two loops in S1 corresponds to the distance between N termini of two actins in the same strand (53 A) but is smaller than that between two actins from the different strands (102 A). The formation of the actomyosin complex proceeds in ordered sequence: S1 initially binds to one actin then binds with the second actin located in the same strand but probably closer to the barbed end of F-actin. The presence of nucleotides slows down the interaction of S1 with the second actin, which correlates with recently proposed cleft movement in a 50 kDa domain of S1. The sequential mechanism of formation of actomyosin interface starting from one end and developing towards the barbed end might be involved in force generation and directional movement in actin-myosin system.     

Molecular properties and functions in vitro of chicken smooth-muscle alpha-actinin in comparison with those of striated-muscle alpha-actinins

alpha-Actinin purified from chicken gizzard smooth muscle was characterized in comparison with alpha-actinins from chicken striated muscles, or fast-skeletal muscle, slow-skeletal muscle, and cardiac muscle. The gizzard alpha-actinin molecule consisted of two apparently identical subunits with a molecular weight of 100,000 on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, as do striated-muscle alpha-actinins. Its isoelectric points in the presence of urea were similar to the striated-muscle counterparts. Despite these similarities, distinctive amino acid sequences between smooth-muscle alpha-actinin and striated-muscle alpha-actinins were revealed by peptide mapping using limited proteolysis in SDS. Gizzard alpha-actinin was immunologically distinguished from striated-muscle alpha-actinins. Gizzard alpha-actinin formed bundles of gizzard F-actin as well as of skeletal-muscle F-actin, but could not form any cross-bridges between adjacent actin filaments under conditions where skeletal-muscle alpha-actinin could. Temperature-dependent competition between gizzard alpha-actinin and tropomyosin on binding to gizzard thin filaments was demonstrated by electron microscopic observations. Gizzard alpha-actinin promoted Mg2+-ATPase activity of reconstituted skeletal actomyosin, gizzard acto-skeletal myosin, and gizzard actomyosin. This promoting effect was depressed by the addition of gizzard tropomyosin. These findings imply that, despite structural differences between gizzard and striated-muscle alpha-actinin molecules, they function similarly in vitro, and that gizzard alpha-actinin can interact not only with smooth-muscle actin (gamma- and beta-actin) but also with skeletal-muscle actin (alpha-actin).     

Myosin binding to actin. Structural analysis using myosin fragments

The actin-binding property of the myosin head 20 K (K = 10(3) Mr) fragment has been examined by a structural assay. A new fragment is produced by digestion of scallop myosin synthetic filaments with a lysine-specific protease. This fragment consists of the rod together with two "nubs" corresponding to the 20 K fragment, which retain both the regulatory and essential light chains. Myosin filaments, digested for different lengths of time, were mixed with F-actin and visualized by electron microscopy after negative staining. When the head is cleaved, but the head fragments remain associated, the filaments bind actin in an ATP-sensitive manner. Filaments made primarily of the nub-containing fragments, however, bind actin very poorly. In addition, electron microscopic characterization of actin-binding by the isolated tryptic 20 K fragment from chicken myosin indicates that binding of this fragment to actin is probably non-specific. These results suggest that interactions between the 20 K region and the other peptides in the head are essential for actin-binding.     

Correlation between polymerizability and conformation in scallop beta-like actin and rabbit skeletal muscle alpha-actin.

In order to investigate the structural basis for functional differences among actin isoforms, we have compared the polymerization properties and conformations of scallop adductor muscle beta-like actin and rabbit skeletal muscle alpha-actin. Polymerization of scallop Ca(2+)-actin was slower than that of skeletal muscle Ca(2+)-actin. Cleavage of the actin polypeptide chain between Gly-42 and Val-43 with Escherichia coli protease ECP 32 impaired the polymerization of scallop Mg(2+)-actin to a greater extent than skeletal muscle Mg(2+)-actin. When monomeric scallop and skeletal muscle Ca(2+)-actins were subjected to limited proteolysis with trypsin, subtilisin, or ECP 32, no differences in the conformation of actin subdomain 2 were detected. At the same time, local differences in the conformations of scallop and skeletal muscle actin subdomains 1 were revealed as intrinsic fluorescence differences. Replacement of tightly bound Ca(2+) with Mg(2+) resulted in more extensive proteolysis of segment 61-69 of scallop actin than in the case of skeletal muscle actin. Furthermore, segment 61-69 was more accessible to proteolysis with subtilisin in polymerized scallop Ca(2+)-actin than in polymerized skeletal muscle Ca(2+)-actin, indicating that, in the polymeric form, the nucleotide-containing cleft is in a more open conformation in beta-like scallop actin than in skeletal muscle alpha-actin. We suggest that this difference between scallop and skeletal muscle actins is due to a less efficient shift of scallop actin subdomain 2 to the position it has in the polymer. The possible consequences of amino acid substitutions in actin subdomain 1 in the allosteric regulation of the actin cleft, and hence in the different stabilities of polymers formed by different actins, are discussed.     

Chicken-gizzard actin. Interaction with skeletal-muscle myosin

Interaction of actin from chicken gizzard and from rabbit skeletal muscle with rabbit skeletal muscle myosin was compared by measuring the rate of superprecipitation, the activation of the Mg-ATPase and inhibition of K-ATPase activity of myosin and heavy meromyosin, and determination of binding of heavy meromyosin in the absence of ATP. Both the rate of superprecipitation of the hybrid actomyosin and the activation of myosin ATPase by gizzard actin are lower than those obtained with skeletal muscle actin. The activation of myosin Mg-ATPase by the two actin species also shows different dependence on substrate concentration: with gizzard actin the substrate inhibition starts at lower ATP concentration. The double-reciprocal plots of the Mg-ATPase activity of heavy meromyosin versus actin concentration yield the same value of the extrapolated ATPase activity at infinite actin concentration (V) for the two actins and nearly double the actin concentration needed to produce half-maximal activation (Kapp) in the case of gizzard actin. A corresponding difference in the abilities of the two actin species to inhibit the K-ATPase activity of heavy meromyosin in the absence of divalent cations was also observed. The results are discussed in terms of the effect of substitutions in the amino acid sequence of gizzard and skeletal muscle actins on their interaction with myosin.     

D-loop of Actin Differently Regulates the Motor Function of Myosins II and V

To gain more information on the manner of actin-myosin interaction, we examined how the motile properties of myosins II and V are affected by the modifications of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop) of actin, performed in two different ways, namely, the proteolytic digestion with subtilisin and the M47A point mutation. In an in vitro motility assay, both modifications significantly decreased the gliding velocity on myosin II-heavy meromyosin due to a weaker generated force but increased it on myosin V. On the other hand, single molecules of myosin V “walked” with the same velocity on both the wild-type and modified actins; however, the run lengths decreased sharply, correlating with a lower affinity of myosin for actin due to the D-loop modifications. The difference between the single-molecule and the ensemble measurements with myosin V indicates that in an in vitro motility assay the non-coordinated multiple myosin V molecules impose internal friction on each other via binding to the same actin filament, which is reduced by the weaker binding to the modified actins. These results show that the D-loop strongly modulates the force generation by myosin II and the processivity of myosin V, presumably affecting actin-myosin interaction in the actomyosin-ADP·P_i state of both myosins.     

Differences in structural dynamics of muscle and yeast actin accompany differences in functional interactions with myosin.

We have used spectroscopic probes ErIA and IAEDANS attached to Cys374 to compare the structural dynamics of yeast actin filaments with that of muscle actin, to understand the structural basis of the less productive interaction of yeast actin with myosin. Time-resolved phosphorescence anisotropy (TPA) of ErIA and steady-state fluorescence of IAEDANS were measured. TPA indicated more rapid rotational motion and more restricted angular amplitude in yeast actin. The fluorescence spectrum was less intense and more red-shifted in yeast actin, suggesting more exposure of the probe to solvent. These results indicate that the two actins differ substantially in the conformational dynamics of the C-terminal region. Binding of myosin S1 induced significantly different spectroscopic changes in TPA and fluorescence of muscle and yeast actin. As a result, the spectroscopic differences between the two actins were decreased by the addition of S1. These results suggest that yeast actin is less effective at activating myosin because of larger changes required in the structure of actin upon strong myosin binding. These results provide insight into the relationship between actomyosin dynamics and function, and they provide a useful framework for structure-function analysis of mutant yeast actin.     

Phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin heads regulates the head-induced movement of tropomyosin

It has been shown that skeletal and smooth muscle myosin heads binding to actin results in the movement of smooth muscle tropomyosin, as revealed by a change in fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a fluorescence donor on tropomyosin and an acceptor on actin (Graceffa, P. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11984-11992). In this work, tropomyosin movement was similarly monitored as a function of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated smooth muscle myosin double-headed fragment smHMM. In the absence of nucleotide and at low myosin head/actin ratios, only phosphorylated heads induced a change in energy transfer. In the presence of ADP, the effect of head phosphorylation was even more dramatic, in that at all levels of myosin head/actin, phosphorylation was necessary to affect energy transfer. It is proposed that the regulation of tropomyosin position on actin by phosphorylation of myosin heads plays a key role in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. In contrast, actin-bound caldesmon was not moved by myosin heads at low head/actin ratios, as uncovered by fluorescence resonance energy transfer and disulfide cross-linking between caldesmon and actin. At higher head concentration caldesmon was dissociated from actin, consistent with the multiple binding model for the binding of caldesmon and myosin heads to actin (Chen, Y., and Chalovich, J. M. (1992) Biophys. J. 63, 1063-1070).     

Actomyosin kinetics and in vitro motility of wild-type Drosophila actin and the effects of two mutations in the Act88F gene.

Two missense mutations of the flight muscle-specific actin gene of Drosophila melanogaster, Act88F, assemble into normally structured myofibrils but affect the flight ability of flies and the mechanical kinetics of isolated muscle fibers. We describe the isolation of actin from different homozygous Act88F strains, including wild-type, an Act88F null mutant (KM88), and two Act88F single point mutations (E316K and G368E), their biochemical interactions with rabbit myosin subfragment 1 (S1), and behavior with rabbit myosin and heavy meromyosin in in vitro motility assays. The rabbit and wild-type Drosophila actins have different association rate constants with S1 (2.64 and 1.77 microM-1 s-1, respectively) and in vitro motilities (2.51, 1.60 microns s-1) clearly demonstrating an isoform-specific difference. The G368E mutation shows a reduced affinity for rabbit S1 compared with the wild type (increasing from 0.11 to 0.17 microM) and a reduced velocity in vitro (reduced by 19%). The E316K mutant actin has no change in affinity for myosin S1 or in vitro motility with heavy meromyosin but does have a reduced in vitro motility (15%) with myosin. These results are discussed with respect to the recently published atomic models for the actomyosin structure and our findings that G368E fibers show a reduced rate constant for delayed tension development and increased fiber stiffness. We interpret these results as possibly caused either by effects on A1 myosin light chain binding or conformational changes within the subdomain 1 of actin, which contains the myosin binding site. E316K is discussed with respect to its likely position within the tropomyosin binding site of actin.     

Structural Comparisons of Muscle and Nonmuscle Actins Give Insights Into the Evolution of Their Functional Differences

Actin is a highly conserved protein although many isoforms exist. In vertebrates and insects the different actin isoforms can be grouped by their amino acid sequence and tissue-specific gene expression into muscle and nonmuscle actins, suggesting that the different actins may have a functional significance. We ask here whether atomic models for G- and F-actins may help to explain this functional diversity. Using a molecular graphics program we have mapped the few amino acids that differ between isoactins. A small number of residues specific for muscle actins are buried in internal positions and some present a remarkable organization. Within the molecule, the replacements observed between muscle and nonmuscle actins are often accompanied by compensatory changes. The others are dispersed on the protein surface, except for a cluster located at the N-terminus which protrudes outward. Only a few of these residues specific for muscle actins are present in known ligand binding sites except the N-terminus, which has a sequence specific for each isoactin and is directly implicated in the binding to myosin. When we simulated the replacements of side chains of residues specific for muscle actins to those specific for nonmuscle actins, the N-terminus appears to be less compact and more flexible in nonmuscle actins. This would represent the first conformational grounds for proposing that muscle and nonmuscle actins may be functionally distinguishable. The rest of the molecule is very similar or identical in all the actins, except for a possible higher internal flexibility in muscle actins. We propose that muscle actin genes have evolved from genes of nonmuscle actins by substitutions leading to some conformational changes in the protruding N-terminus and the internal dynamics of the main body of the protein. Received: 15 March 1996 / Accepted: 14 July 1996     

Orientation of the backbone structure of myosin filaments in relaxed and rigor muscles of the housefly: Evidence for non-equivalent crossbridge positions at the surface of thick filaments

The orientation of the backbone structure of myosin filaments of relaxed and rigor fibers of the flight muscles of the housefly, Musca domestica, relative to the actin filaments has been investigated. In relaxed muscles 23% of the myosin filaments have gaps in the wall of their shaft located opposite the surrounding actin filaments, while in 77% the subfilament pairs of the wall are thus located. These are the expected values if the backbone orientation is random. In rigor muscles 40% of the thick filaments have their gaps opposite the actins and 60%, the subfilament pairs are opposite the actins. This increase in the percentage of filaments with gaps opposite the actins therefore results from binding of the crossbridges in rigor with change in rotational orientation of the backbone. The findings are related to a model of Beinbrech et al. (1988) in which two populations of crossbridges have been postulated: one originating at the surface of the thick filaments, the other coming from within the gap between the subfilament pairs.     

The Association of Myosin IB with Actin Waves in Dictyostelium Requires Both the Plasma Membrane-Binding Site and Actin-Binding Region in the Myosin Tail

F-actin structures and their distribution are important determinants of the dynamic shapes and functions of eukaryotic cells. Actin waves are F-actin formations that move along the ventral cell membrane driven by actin polymerization. Dictyostelium myosin IB is associated with actin waves but its role in the wave is unknown. Myosin IB is a monomeric, non-filamentous myosin with a globular head that binds to F-actin and has motor activity, and a non-helical tail comprising a basic region, a glycine-proline-glutamine-rich region and an SH3-domain. The basic region binds to acidic phospholipids in the plasma membrane through a short basic-hydrophobic site and the Gly-Pro-Gln region binds F-actin. In the current work we found that both the basic-hydrophobic site in the basic region and the Gly-Pro-Gln region of the tail are required for the association of myosin IB with actin waves. This is the first evidence that the Gly-Pro-Gln region is required for localization of myosin IB to a specific actin structure in situ. The head is not required for myosin IB association with actin waves but binding of the head to F-actin strengthens the association of myosin IB with waves and stabilizes waves. Neither the SH3-domain nor motor activity is required for association of myosin IB with actin waves. We conclude that myosin IB contributes to anchoring actin waves to the plasma membranes by binding of the basic-hydrophobic site to acidic phospholipids in the plasma membrane and binding of the Gly-Pro-Gln region to F-actin in the wave.     

Segmental flexibility and head-head interaction in scallop myosin. A study using saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy

Saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to investigate the rotational motion of the head domains of native and desensitized scallop myosin and its proteolytic subfragments. Scallop myosin was spin-labelled with 4-(2-iodoacetamido)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinooxyl, which reacted with a heavy chain residue in the subfragment 1 domain. As previously shown for rabbit skeletal muscle myosin (Thomas et al., 1975), the two head domains of native scallop myosin appear to have independent motion (rotational correlation time, pi, = 0.8 X 10(-7) s for subfragment 1; 1.4 X 10(-7) s for myosin). However, removal of a regulatory light chain, to effect desensitization of the actin-activated ATPase, was associated with an increase in pi for myosin to a value of 2.4 X 10(-6) s. The Ca2+ sensitivity and initial correlation time were restored on recombination of the regulatory light chain in the presence of Mg2+. Sedimentation velocity profiles in an analytical ultracentrifuge indicated that the desensitized myosin preparations were largely monomeric and therefore the change in pi appears to reflect an intramolecular event. Addition of EDTA to spin-labelled scallop heavy meromyosin caused an immediate 2.5 to 4-fold increase in pi and a partial desensitization of the ATPase activity. Comparable experiments with subfragment 1 yielded a barely detectable increase in pi (1.5-fold) in the first ten minutes. The restricted rotational motion observed in desensitized myosin and heavy meromyosin could arise by a conformational change in the subfragment 1-subfragment 2 hinge region or by an association of one head with its partner. The latter mechanism, involving the exposed light chain binding site, would also explain the preferential release of one regulatory light chain from scallop myosin, and might account for some other co-operative effects observed in this molecule (Bagshaw, 1980).     

Molecular dynamics simulation of tropomyosin bound to actins/myosin in the closed and open states

Tropomyosin (Tpm) is a dimeric coiled-coil protein that binds to filamentous actin, and regulates actin-myosin interaction by moving between three positions corresponding to the blocked, closed, and open states. To elucidate how Tpm undergoes transitions between these functional states, we have built structural models and conducted extensive molecular dynamics simulations of the Tpm-actins/myosin complex in the closed and open states (total simulation time >1.4 μs). Based on the simulation trajectories, we have analyzed the dynamics and energetics of a truncated Tpm interacting with actins/myosin under the physiological conditions. Our simulations have shown distinct dynamics of four Tpm periods (P3-P6), featuring pronounced biased fluctuations of P4 and P5 toward the open position in the closed state, which is consistent with a conformational selection mechanism for Tpm-regulated myosin binding. Additionally, we have identified key residues of Tpm specifically binding to actins/myosin in the closed and open state. Some of them were validated as functionally important in comparison with past functional/clinical studies, and the rest will make promising targets for future mutational experiments.     

Protein-protein interactions in actin-myosin binding and structural effects of R405Q mutation: a molecular dynamics study

Detailed residue-wise interactions involved in the binding of myosin to actin in the rigor conformation without nucleotides have been examined using molecular dynamics simulations of the chicken skeletal myosin head complexed with two actin monomers, based on the cryo-microscopic model of Holmes et al. (Nature 2003;425:423-427). The overall interaction is largely electrostatic in nature, because of the charged residues in the four loops surrounding the central primary binding site. The 50k/20k loop, disordered in crystal structures and in simulations of free myosin in solution, was found to be in a conformation stabilized with 1 - 2 internal salt bridges. The cardiomyopathy loop forms 2 - 3 interprotein salt bridges with actin monomers upon binding, whereas its Arg405 residue, the mutation site associated with the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, forms a strong salt bridge with Glu605 in the neighboring helix away from actin in the actin-bound myosin. The myopathy loop of the R405Q mutant maintains a high degree of two-strand beta-sheet character when bound to actin with the corresponding salt bridges broken.     

Myosin light-chain domain rotates upon muscle activation but not ATP hydrolysis.

We have studied the correlation between myosin structure, myosin biochemistry, and muscle force. Two distinct orientations of the myosin light-chain domain were previously resolved using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of spin-labeled regulatory light chains in scallop muscle fibers. In the present study, we measured isometric force during EPR spectral acquisition, in order to define how these two light-chain domain orientations are coupled to force and the myosin ATPase cycle. When muscle fibers are partially activated with increasing amounts of calcium, the distribution between the two light-chain domain orientations shifts toward the one associated with strong actin binding. This shift in distribution is linearly related to the increase in force, suggesting that rotation of the light-chain domain is coupled to strong actin binding. However, when nucleotide analogues are used to trap myosin in the pre- and posthydrolysis states of its ATPase cycle in relaxed muscle, there is no change in the distribution between light-chain domain orientations, showing that the rotation of the light-chain domain is not directly coupled to the ATP hydrolysis step. Instead, it is likely that in relaxed muscle the myosin thick filament stabilizes two light-chain domain orientations that are independent of the nucleotide analogue bound at the active site. We conclude that a large and distinct rotation of the light-chain domain of myosin is responsible for force generation and is coupled to strong actin binding but is not coupled to a specific step in the myosin ATPase reaction.