How initiation factors tune the rate of initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria

The kinetics of initiator transfer RNA (tRNA) interaction with the messenger RNA (mRNA)-programmed 30S subunit and the rate of 50S subunit docking to the 30S preinitiation complex were measured for different combinations of initiation factors in a cell-free Escherichia coli system for protein synthesis with components of high purity. The major results are summarized by a Michaelis-Menten scheme for initiation. All three initiation factors are required for maximal efficiency (kcat/KM) of initiation and for maximal in vivo rate of initiation at normal concentration of initiator tRNA. Spontaneous release of IF3 from the 30S preinitiation complex is required for subunit docking. The presence of initiator tRNA on the 30S subunit greatly increases the rate of 70S ribosome formation by increasing the rate of IF3 dissociation from the 30S subunit and the rate of 50S subunit docking to the IF3-free 30S preinitiation complex. The reasons why IF1 and IF3 are essential in E. coli are discussed in the light of the present observations.     

Stage-specific initiation factors for protein synthesis during insect development

In insects, as in bacteria, the smaller (40 S) ribosomal subunit binds messenger RNA during initiation of protein synthesis. An 80 S ribosomal unit is formed by association of free 40 S and 60 S subunits. Formation of the complete initiation complex requires GTP, aminoacyl-tRNA, protein initiation factors and messenger RNA. The complex sediments as an 80 S band on sucrose gradient. Protein initiation factors are extracted from unwashed ribosomes and appear to be able to discriminate between messenger RNAs obtained from different stages of development. They promote formation of the 80 S complex only when messenger RNA is extracted from the same stage of development, providing a mechanism for control of protein synthesis by which ribosomes can select the messenger RNA to be translated. Two possibilities have been proposed to explain this phenomenon: (1) that a group of messenger RNAs from a given stage of development may have a specific sequence of nucleotides preceding the AUG codon. This sequence is recognized by a stage-specific element of the initiation machinery; (2) and or, the secondary structure of messenger RNA from a given stage of development may be specific and therefore recognized by a unique initiation factor.     

Host interference with viral gene expression: mode of action of bacterial factor i

The mechanism of interference with R17 viral RNA expression by a host protein, factor i, was studied. Formation of initiation complexes on native bacteriophage R17 RNA molecules, as well as translation of R17 RNA in vitro, is blocked almost quantitatively by factor i. This inhibition is readily overcome by the addition of excess R17 RNA. Extensive complex formation between factor i and R17 RNA occurs during inhibition of initiation complex formation. Moreover, the extent of inhibition of R17 RNA translation correlates closely with the extent of complex formation between factor i and R17 RNA, and exhibits the same sigmoid concentration dependence on factor i.Although initiation complex formation is totally dependent upon initiation factor IF-3, neither this function of IF-3, nor its ability to prevent the association of 30 S and 50 S ribosomal subunits into single ribosomes, is affected by factor i. IF-3, even when present in tenfold molar excess over factor i, fails to relieve the inhibition of initiation on R17 RNA.It is concluded that factor i is a translational represser acting directly on messenger RNA. It is suggested that this repression is cistron-specific, affecting only viral coat protein synthesis. Messenger RNA discrimination by factor i does not involve initiation factor IF-3.     

How initiation factors maximize the accuracy of tRNA selection in initiation of bacterial protein synthesis

During initiation of bacterial protein synthesis, messenger RNA and fMet-tRNAfMet bind to the 30S ribosomal subunit together with initiation factors IF1, IF2, and IF3. Docking of the 30S preinitiation complex to the 50S ribosomal subunit results in a peptidyl-transfer competent 70S ribosome. Initiation with an elongator tRNA may lead to frameshift and an aberrant N-terminal sequence in the nascent protein. We show how the occurrence of initiation errors is minimized by (1) recognition of the formyl group by the synergistic action of IF2 and IF1, (2) uniform destabilization of the binding of all tRNAs to the 30S subunit by IF3, and (3) an optimal distance between the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and the initiator codon. We suggest why IF1 is essential for E. coli, discuss the role of the G-C base pairs in the anticodon stem of some tRNAs, and clarify gene expression changes with varying IF3 concentration in the living cell.     

The effects of initiation factor 3 on the formation of 30S initiation complexes with synthetic and natural messengers

Initiation factor IF-3 is required for the binding of fMet-tRNA to 70S ribosomes directed by AUG, poly (U,G), f₂RNA and T₄ late RNA as well as for the binding of acPhe-tRNA directed by poly (U). In contrast, IF-3 is not required for the binding of the initiator aminoacyl-tRNAs to isolated 30S subunits directed by the synthetic messengers, but is required for maximal formation of initiation complexes with natural messengers. These data indicate that with synthetic messengers the sole function of IF-3 is to dissociate the 70S ribosomes into subunits, whereas with natural messengers IF-3 is required not only for dissociation of the ribosomes but also for the binding of the messenger to the 30S subunit.     

Identification of features in 5' terminal fragments from reovirus mRNA which are important for ribosome binding

Four types of experiments were carried out with reovirus messenger RNAs or with 5′ terminal fragments of known sequence to identify features in mRNA which appear to be important for formation of initiation complexes with ribosomes. With a number of reovirus mRNAs, 40S initiation complexes had been previously shown to protect a significantly larger segment of the RNA (including the 5′ terminal m7G) than that protected by 80S initiation complexes. Each 80S-protected sequence had an AUG codon and was a subset of the 40S-protected sequence from the same message. When 40S- and 80S-protected fragments were tested for ability to rebind to ribosomes, the 80S-protected fragments showed considerably lower binding ability, implying that the “extra” sequences protected by 40S initiation complexes contribute to ribosome attachment. Nevertheless, wheat germ ribosomes select the same 5′ terminal initiation site in each reovirus mRNA, irrespective of the presence or absence of m7G on the message. This was demonstrated by comparing fingerprints of the ribosome-protected regions obtained with methylated versus unmethylated RNA. The contribution of m7G to formation of initiation complexes is therefore quantitative rather than qualitative. Limited T1 RNAase digestion of isolated 5′ terminal fragments from several reovirus messages generated a series of smaller fragments which were analyzed for ability to rebind to ribosomes. Partial digestion products up to 30 nucleotides in length which retained the 5′ cap but not the AUG codon were unable to associate stably with ribosomes, whereas every AUG-containing fragment that was analyzed was able to form initiation complexes. The efficiency of binding of certain AUG-containing fragments, however, was reduced by removal of either the 5′ terminal region, including the cap, or of sequences comprising the beginning of the coding region, on the 3′ side of the AUG. Complex formation between messenger RNA and ribosomes was inhibited by the trinucleotide AUG, but not by various other oligonucleotides. Although the inhibition was specific, a vast excess of trinucleotide was required for moderate inhibition of 80S complex formation, and the same concentration of AUG failed to inhibit formation of 40S initiation complexes.     

Involvement of ribosomal protein S1 in the assembly of the initiation complex.

Antibodies against ribosomal protein S1 (anti-S1) have been used to determine the function of S1 in the partial reactions involved in the translation of MS2 RNA in vitro. Vacant ribosomes are fully sensitive to the antibodies, whereas elongating ribosomes are resistant. We have determined at which stage of translation the resistance to anti-S1 is acquired. We find that insensitivity to anti-S1 already arises upon mixing 30-S subunits with MS2 RNA. Apparently the two particles form a complex in which S1 is functionally protected against its antibody. Complex formation depends on elevated temperature, a suitable ionic environment and it is stimulated by the initiation factor IF-3. It does not depend on IF-1, IF-2 or fMet-tRNA. Thus ribosomes have the potential to recognize the messenger in the absence of fMet-tRNA. Protein S1 appears directly involved in this primary recognition reaction.     

Translation by Escherichia coli ribosomes of alfalfa mosaic virus RNA 4 can be initiated at two sites on the monocistronic message.

Substantial evidence is provided to corroborate our previous finding that Escherichia coli ribosomes recognize two binding sites on the 5' end of alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV) RNA 4 [for a preliminary report see Castel, A., Kraal, B., Kerklaan, P. R. M., Klok, J., and Bosch, L. (1977) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 5509--5513]. Translation can start at either site using AcPhe-tRNA or fMet-RNA as initiator and takes place in the same reading frame along the monocistronic mRNA. The size and composition of the isolated extra NH2-terminal fragment of the acetylphenylalanyl product were found to be in agreement with the 5' non-coding region of the messenger. Removal of the 5'-terminal cap structure of AMV RNA 4 did not influence significantly both initiation reactions. Ribosomal protein S1 was essential for binding as well as incorporation of both fMet-tRNA and AcPhe-tRNA. A similar interaction on the ribosome was found for AcPhe-tRNA directed by AMV RNA 4 as for fMet-tRNA directed by either AMV RNA 4 or MS2 RNA with respect to the influence of initiation factors. It is concluded that the heterologous plant viral messenger is reliably translated in the E. coli system and that E. coli ribosomes recognize with high specificity an extra initiation site close to the 5' extremity of the messenger. The relationship of this site to a hypothetical entry site involved in the early recognition in the initiation mechanism between ribosome and messenger is discussed.     

Translation initiation without IF2-dependent GTP hydrolysis

Translation initiation factor IF2 is a guanine nucleotide-binding protein. The free energy change associated with guanosine triphosphate hydrolase (GTPase) activity of these proteins is believed to be the driving force allowing them to perform their functions as molecular switches. We examined role and relevance of IF2 GTPase and demonstrate that an Escherichia coli IF2 mutant bearing a single amino acid substitution (E571K) in its 30S binding domain (IF2-G3) can perform in vitro all individual translation initiation functions of wild type (wt) IF2 and supports faithful messenger RNA translation, despite having a reduced affinity for the 30S subunit and being completely inactive in GTP hydrolysis. Furthermore, the corresponding GTPase-null mutant of Bacillus stearothermophilus (E424K) can replace in vivo wt IF2 allowing an E. coli infB null mutant to grow with almost wt duplication times. Following the E571K (and E424K) mutation, which likely disrupts hydrogen bonding between subdomains G2 and G3, IF2 acquires a guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-like conformation, no longer responsive to GTP binding thereby highlighting the importance of interdomain communication in IF2. Our data underlie the importance of GTP as an IF2 ligand in the early initiation steps and the dispensability of the free energy generated by the IF2 GTPase in the late events of the translation initiation pathway.     

Messenger RNA conformations in the ribosomal E site revealed by X-ray crystallography

A comparison of messenger RNA in X-ray crystal structures of 70S ribosomal complexes in the initiation, post-initiation and elongation states of translation shows distinct conformational differences in the exit (E) codon. Here, we present structural evidence indicating that, after the initiation event, the E codon nucleotides relax and form a classical A-helical conformation. This conformation is similar to that of the P and A codons, and is favourable for establishing Watson-Crick interactions with the anticodon of E-site transfer RNA.     

Structural dynamics of bacterial ribosomes: II. Preparation and characterization of ribosomes and subunits active in the translation of natural messenger RNA

Ribosomes from Escherichia coli were tested for activity in initiation with R17 RNA as messenger. All vacant 70 S ribosomes but not all subunits were found to be active. The ability of 30 S and 50 S subunits to form a 70 S couple at Mg²⁺ concentrations above 4 mm is a stringent test for activity.Fresh extracts, prepared at 10 mm-Mg²⁺ from cells harvested after slow cooling contain up to 80% of the ribosomes in the form of vacant 70 S couples and 20% of free subunits. The proportion of subunits increases with standing as a result of the preferential inactivation of the 50 S particles. “Native” subunits are heterogeneous and consist mostly of active 30 S and inactive 50 S particles.In contrast to 50 S subunits, 30 S subunits prepared by exposure of 70 S ribosomes to low Mg²⁺ concentrations, are largely inactive and unable to reassociate with their active 50 S counterparts. However, both initiation and association activity can be restored by heating.The results imply that the structures necessary for subunit association are most critical for the biological activity of ribosomes, presumably because they are topologically closely related to the binding sites for messenger RNA, transfer RNA, and the protein factors for initiation, translocation and termination.     

Ribosomal Binding of Labelled Initiation Factor F<Subscript>3</Subscript>

The following two articles clarify the involvement of initiation factor F₃ in the translation of messenger RNA. First, Sabol and Ochoa tell how they used ³⁵S-labelled F₃ to prove that 70S ribosomes, released at polypeptide chain termination, are dissociated when F₃ binds to the 30S ribosomal subunit.     

Initiation factor IF-3 and the binary complex between initiation factor IF-2 and formylmethionyl-tRNA are mutually exclusive on the 30-S ribosomal subunit.

The formation of 30-S initiation complexes depends strongly on initiation factor IF-3; at molar ratios of IF-3 to 30-S ribosomes up to one a stimulation is observed, whereas at ratios higher than one, initiation complex formation declines strongly. The target of the observed inhibition of fMet-tRNA binding at high concentrations of IF-3 is the 30-S initiation complex itself. On the one hand addition of IF-3 to preformed 30-S initiation complexes leads to a release of bound fMet-tRNA which is linear with the amount of factor added, whereas no effect on isolated 70-S initiation complexes is seen. The release of fMet-tRNA from preformed 30-S initiation complexes is accompanied by a release of IF-2 in a one-to-one molar ratio which is in agreement with our previous findings showing that binding of fMet-tRNA takes place via a binary complex: IF-2 . fMet-tRNA (Eur. J. Biochem. 66, 181--192 and 77, 69--75). On the other hand increasing amounts of both IF-2 and fMet-tRNA relieve the IF-3-induced inhibition of 30-S initiation complex formation. From these findings it is concluded that IF-3 and the IF-2 . fMet-tRNA complex are mutually exclusive on the 30-S ribosome. This implies that under our experimental conditions MS2 RNA binding precedes fMet-tRNA binding if one accepts that the presence of IF-3 on the 30-S subunit is obligatory for messenger binding.     

Resistance of bacterial protein synthesis to double-stranded RNA

Double-stranded RNA fails to inhibit the formation of translation initiation complexes on R17 bacteriophage RNA, overall synthesis of R17 proteins, or the ability of bacterial initiation factor IF-3 to prevent the association of 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits into single ribosomes. Yet, IF-3 can form complexes with double-stranded RNA. However, IF-3 binds to double-stranded RNA with lower apparent affinity than to either R17 RNA or 30S ribosomal subunits; this may explain the resistance of bacterial protein synthesis to double-stranded RNA.     

Requirement of chain initiation factor 3 and ribosomal protein S1 in translation of synthetic and natural messenger RNA.

Amino acid incorporation directed by poly(A), poly(U) or R17 RNA has been examined in S1-depleted protein synthesizing systems. We observe that the translation of either synthetic or natural messenger RNA is strictly dependent on the presence of chain initiation factor 3 and ribosomal protein S1. With poly(A) or poly(U) both IF-3 and S1 stimulate amino acid incorporation at least 25-fold, and with R17 RNA the stimulation is approximately 15-fold. More than one copy of S1 per ribosome decreases amino acid incorporation directed by poly(U) or R17 RNA. Initiation complex formation with R17 RNA is also stimulated optimally by the addition of one copy of S1 per ribosome. The function of IF-3 and S1 in protein synthesis is considered.     

Translation of Synthetic and Endogenous Messenger Ribonucleic Acid In Vitro by Ribosomes and Polyribosomes from Clostridium pasteurianum

Ribosomes and polyribosomes from Clostridium pasteurianum were isolated and their activities were compared with those of ribosomes from Escherichia coli in protein synthesis in vitro. C. pasteurianum ribosomes exhibited a high level of activity due to endogenous messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA). For translation of polyuridylic acid [poly(U)], C. pasteurianum ribosomes required a higher concentration of Mg(2+) and a much higher level of poly(U) than did E. coli ribosomes. Phage f2 RNA added to the system with C. pasteurianum ribosomes gave no significant stimulation of protein synthesis in a homologous system or with E. coli initiation factors. The 30S and 50S subunits prepared from C. pasteurianum ribosomes reassociated less readily than subunits from E. coli. The ability of the C. pasteurianum subunits to reassociated was found to be dependent upon the presence of a reducing agent during preparation and during analysis of the reassociation products. In heterologous combinations, E. coli 30S subunits associated readily with C. pasteurianum 50S subunits to form 70S particles, but C. pasteurianum 30S subunits and E. coli 50S subunits did not associate. In poly(U) translation, E. coli 30S subunits were active in combination with 50S subunits from either E. coli or C. pasteurianum, but C. pasteurianum 30S subunits were not active in combination with either type of 50S subunits. Polyribosomes prepared from C. pasteurianum were very active in protein synthesis, and well-defined ribosomal aggregates as large as heptamers could be seen on sucrose gradients. An attempt was made to demonstrate synthesis in vitro of ferredoxin.