The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly

Two very similar H3 histones-differing at only four amino acid positions-are produced in Drosophila cells. Here we describe a mechanism of chromatin regulation whereby the variant H3.3 is deposited at particular loci, including active rDNA arrays. While the major H3 is incorporated strictly during DNA replication, amino acid changes toward H3.3 allow replication-independent (RI) deposition. In contrast to replication-coupled (RC) deposition, RI deposition does not require the N-terminal tail. H3.3 is the exclusive substrate for RI deposition, and its counterpart is the only substrate retained in yeast. RI substitution of H3.3 provides a mechanism for the immediate activation of genes that are silenced by histone modification. Inheritance of newly deposited nucleosomes may then mark sites as active loci.     

The localization of histone H3.3 in germ line chromatin of Drosophila males as established with a histone H3.3-specific antiserum

A rabbit antiserum, specific for the histone H3.3 replacement variant, was raised with the aid of a histone H3.3-specific peptide. Immuno blot experiments demonstrated the specificity of this polyclonal antiserum. In addition, we showed on immuno blots that two monoclonal antibodies isolated from mice with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) display strong reactivity with the H3.3 histone, but not with its replication-dependent counterparts. Our observations indicate that histone H3.3 might play a role as autoantigen in SLE. We used the histone H3.3-specific antiserum to characterize the germ line chromatin in cytological preparations of Drosophila testes, because our previous studies had shown that a histone H3.3-encoding gene is strongly expressed in the germ line of Drosophila males. The antiserum reacted with some of the lampbrush loops in spermatocytes and with chromatin of the postmeiotic germ cells of males. Our data indicate that histone H3.3 is not evenly distributed throughout the chromatin of germ cells, but is concentrated in distinct regions. Histone H3.3 disappears from the spermatid nuclei, along with the other core histones, during the late stages of spermatogenesis. In Drosophila polytene chromosomes, however, a rather uniform distribution of the histone H3.3 was observed. The possible role of histone H3.3 is discussed. Received: 12 May 1997 / Accepted: 4 July 1997     

DAXX adds a de novo H3.3K9me3 deposition pathway to the histone chaperone network

1. Download : Download high-res image (189KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Dynamics of histone H3 acetylation in the nucleosome core during mouse pre-implantation development

In mammals, the time period that follows fertilization is characterized by extensive chromatin remodeling, which enables epigenetic reprogramming of the gametes. Major changes in chromatin structure persist until the time of implantation, when the embryo develops into a blastocyst, which comprises the inner cell mass and the trophectoderm. Changes in DNA methylation, histone variant incorporation, and covalent modifications of the histones tails have been intensively studied during pre-implantation development. However, modifications within the core of the nucleosomes have not been systematically analyzed. Here, we report the first characterization and temporal analysis of 3 key acetylated residues in the core of the histone H3: H3K64ac, H3K122ac, and H3K56ac, all located at structurally important positions close to the DNA. We found that all 3 acetylations occur during pre-implantation development, but with different temporal kinetics. Globally, H3K64ac and H3K56ac were detected throughout cleavage stages, while H3K122ac was only weakly detectable during this time. Our work contributes to the understanding of the contribution of histone modifications in the core of the nucleosome to the “marking” of the newly established embryonic chromatin and unveils new modification pathways potentially involved in epigenetic reprogramming.     

Mapping the interaction surface of linker histone H1(0) with the nucleosome of native chromatin in vivo

H1 linker histones stabilize the nucleosome, limit nucleosome mobility and facilitate the condensation of metazoan chromatin. Here, we have combined systematic mutagenesis, measurement of in vivo binding by photobleaching microscopy, and structural modeling to determine the binding geometry of the globular domain of the H1(0) linker histone variant within the nucleosome in unperturbed, native chromatin in vivo. We demonstrate the existence of two distinct DNA-binding sites within the globular domain that are formed by spatial clustering of multiple residues. The globular domain is positioned via interaction of one binding site with the major groove near the nucleosome dyad. The second site interacts with linker DNA adjacent to the nucleosome core. Multiple residues bind cooperatively to form a highly specific chromatosome structure that provides a mechanism by which individual domains of linker histones interact to facilitate chromatin condensation.     

Mitosis-specific histone H3 phosphorylation in vitro in nucleosome structures

A mechanism of mitosis-specific enhancement of histone H3 phosphorylation was analyzed in vitro in terms of nucleosome structure. The incorporation of [32P]phosphate into DNA-bound H3 was approximately 5-7 times higher than in DNA-free H3 using the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. The two major N-terminal serine sites, including the mitosis-specific site (Ser10) and Ser28, were extensively phosphorylated in the DNA-bound forms. These phosphorylation patterns were identical to those of nucleosomal H3. In contrast, the H3 in DNA-free octamers was very slightly phosphorylated. The major site of H3 phosphorylation in DNA-free H3 was Thr118 in the C-terminus. Results indicate that DNA-binding is essential for the high level of mitosis-specific H3 phosphorylation, and that the nucleosome structure promotes H3 N-terminal phosphorylation in vitro. It also suggests the possibility that H1 prevents H3 phosphorylation during interphase of the cell cycle.     

In silico approaches reveal the potential for DNA sequence-dependent histone octamer affinity to influence chromatin structure in vivo

Nucleosome positioning signals embedded within the DNA sequence have the potential to influence the detailed structure of the higher-order chromatin fibre. In two previous studies of long stretches of DNA, encompassing the chicken beta-globin and ovine beta-lactoglobulin genes, respectively, we mapped the relative affinity of every site for the core histone octamer. In both cases a periodic arrangement of the in vitro positioning sites suggests that they might influence the folding of a nucleosome chain into higher-order structure; this hypothesis was borne out in the case of the beta-lactoglobulin gene, where the distribution of the in vitro positioning sites is related to the positions nucleosomes actually occupy in sheep liver cells. Here, we have exploited the in vitro nucleosome positioning datasets to simulate nucleosomal organisation using in silico approaches. We use the high-resolution, quantitative positioning maps to define a one-dimensional positioning energy lattice, which can be populated with a defined number of nucleosomes. Monte Carlo techniques are employed to simulate the behaviour of the model at equilibrium to produce a set of configurations, which provide a probability-based occupancy map. Employing a variety of techniques we show that the occupancy maps are a sensitive function of the histone octamer density (nucleosome repeat length) and find that a minimal change in this property can produce dramatic localised changes in structure. Although simulations generally give rise to regular periodic nucleosomal arrangements, they often show octamer density-dependent discontinuities, which tend to co-localise with sequences that adopt distinctive chromatin structure in vivo. Furthermore, the overall organisation of simulated chromatin structures are more closely related to the situation in vivo than is the original in vitro positioning data, particularly at a nucleosome density corresponding to the in vivo state. Although our model is simplified, we argue that it provides a unique insight into the influence that DNA sequence can have in determining chromatin structure and could serve as a useful basis for the incorporation of other parameters.     

Replacement of histone H1 by H5 in vivo does not change the nucleosome repeat length of chromatin but increases its stability.

In vivo competition between histones H1 and H5 for chromatin has been studied in rat sarcoma XC10 cells transfected with a glucocorticoid responsive MMTV-H5 gene. Activation of H5 expression results in accumulation of H5 in the nuclei where it partially replaces H1. H5 displaces H1 from its primary binding sites presumably during chromatin replication and also binds with high affinity to secondary chromatin sites normally not occupied by H1. Replacement of H1 by H5 to levels similar to those of mature chicken erythrocytes does not alter the nucleosome repeat length of chromatin. This indicates that H5 is not solely responsible for the increase in nucleosome spacing of maturing erythroid cells. Exchange of H1 by H5 in vivo or in vitro results in a higher compaction/stability of chromatin.