共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Yung-Kuo Lin Yen-Yu Lu Yao-Chang Chen Yi-Jen Chen Shih-Ann Chen 《Journal of biomedical science》2010,17(1):20
Background
Pulmonary veins (PVs) are the most important sources of ectopic beats with the initiation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, or the foci of ectopic atrial tachycardia and focal atrial fibrillation. Elimination of nitric oxide (NO) enhances cardiac triggered activity, and NO can decrease PV arrhythmogensis through mechano-electrical feedback. However, it is not clear whether NO may have direct electrophysiological effects on PV cardiomyocytes. This study is aimed to study the effects of nitroprusside (NO donor), on the ionic currents and arrhythmogenic activity of single cardiomyocytes from the PVs. 相似文献2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
M. Kottmaier F. Bourier S. Wünscher M. Kornmayer V. Semmler S. Lengauer M. Telishevska K. Koch-Büttner E. Risse S. Brooks G. Hessling I. Deisenhofer T. Reents 《Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal》2018,18(6):203-207
Background
Pulmonary vein (PV) reconduction after PV isolation (PVI) unmasked by adenosine is associated with a higher risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) recurrence. It is unknown if the reconnected PVs after adenosine testing and immediate re-ablation can predict reconnection and reconnection patterns of PVs at repeat procedures. We assessed reconnection of PVs with and without dormant-conduction (DC) during the first and the repeat procedure.Methods
We included 67 patients undergoing PVI for PAF and a second procedure for PAF recurrence. DC during adenosine administration at first procedure was seen in 31 patients (46%). 264 PVs were tested with adenosine; DC was found in 48?PVs (18%) and re-ablated during first procedure. During the second procedure, all PVs where checked for reconnection.Results
Fifty-eight patients (87%) showed PV reconnection during the second procedure. Reconnection was found in 152/264?PVs (58%). Of 216?PVs without reconnection during adenosine testing at the first ablation, 116?PVs (53.7%) showed reconnection at the repeat procedure. Overall, 14.9% of patients showed the same PV reconnection pattern in the first and second procedure, expected statistical probability of encountering the same reconnection pattern was only 6.6%(p?=?0.012).Conclusions
In repeat procedures PVs showed significantly more often the same reconnection pattern as during first procedure than statistically expected. More than 50% of initial isolated PVs without reconnection during adenosine testing showed a reconnection during repeat ablation. Techniques to detect susceptibility for PV re-connection like prolonged waiting-period should be applied. Elimination of DC should be expanded from segmental to circumferential re-isolation or vaster RF application. 相似文献7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Annette D. Rieg Rolf Rossaint Eva Verjans Nina A. Maih?fer Stefan Uhlig Christian Martin 《PloS one》2013,8(6)