Stimulation of phospholipase Cβ by membrane interactions,interdomain movement,and G protein binding — How many ways can you activate an enzyme?

Signaling proteins are usually composed of one or more conserved structural domains. These domains are usually regulatory in nature by binding to specific activators or effectors, or species that regulate cellular location, etc. Inositol-specific mammalian phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes are multidomain proteins whose activities are controlled by regulators, such as G proteins, as well as membrane interactions. One of these domains has been found to bind membranes, regulators, and activate the catalytic region. The recently solved structure of a major region of PLC-beta2 together with the structure of PLC-delta1 and a wealth of biochemical studies poises the system towards an understanding of the mechanism through which their regulations occurs.     

Membrane recognition by phospholipid-binding domains

Many different globular domains bind to the surfaces of cellular membranes, or to specific phospholipid components in these membranes, and this binding is often tightly regulated. Examples include pleckstrin homology and C2 domains, which are among the largest domain families in the human proteome. Crystal structures, binding studies and analyses of subcellular localization have provided much insight into how members of this diverse group of domains bind to membranes, what features they recognize and how binding is controlled. A full appreciation of these processes is crucial for understanding how protein localization and membrane topography and trafficking are regulated in cells.     

Computer modeling of the membrane interaction of FYVE domains

FYVE domains are membrane targeting domains that are found in proteins involved in endosomal trafficking and signal transduction pathways. Most FYVE domains bind specifically to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI(3)P), a lipid that resides mainly in endosomal membranes. Though the specific interactions between FYVE domains and the headgroup of PI(3)P have been well characterized, principally through structural studies, the available experimental structures suggest several different models for FYVE/membrane association. Thus, the manner in which FYVE domains adsorb to the membrane surface remains to be elucidated. Towards this end, recent experiments have shown that FYVE domains bind PI(3)P in the context of phospholipid bilayers and that hydrophobic residues on a conserved loop are able to penetrate the membrane interface in a PI(3)P-dependent manner.Here, the finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann (FDPB) method has been used to calculate the energetic interactions of FYVE domains with phospholipid membranes. Based on the computational analysis, it is found that (1) recruitment to membranes is facilitated by non-specific electrostatic interactions that occur between basic residues on the domains and acidic phospholipids in the membrane, (2) the energetic analysis can quantitatively differentiate among the modes of membrane association proposed by the experimentally determined structures, (3) FDPB calculations predict energetically feasible models for the membrane-associated states of FYVE domains, (4) these models are consistent with the observation that conserved hydrophobic residues insert into the membrane interface, and (5) the calculations provide a molecular model for the hydrophobic partitioning: binding of PI(3)P significantly neutralizes positive potential in the region of the hydrophobic residues, which acts as an "electrostatic switch" by reducing the energetic barrier for membrane penetration. Finally, the computational results are extended to FYVE domains of unknown structure through the construction of high quality homology models for human FYVE sequences.     

Src kinase activity and SH2 domain regulate the dynamics of Src association with lipid and protein targets

Src functions depend on its association with the plasma membrane and with specific membrane-associated assemblies. Many aspects of these interactions are unclear. We investigated the functions of kinase, SH2, and SH3 domains in Src membrane interactions. We used FRAP beam-size analysis in live cells expressing a series of c-Src-GFP proteins with targeted mutations in specific domains together with biochemical experiments to determine whether the mutants can generate and bind to phosphotyrosyl proteins. Wild-type Src displays lipid-like membrane association, whereas constitutively active Src-Y527F interacts transiently with slower-diffusing membrane-associated proteins. These interactions require Src kinase activity and SH2 binding, but not SH3 binding. Furthermore, overexpression of paxillin, an Src substrate with a high cytoplasmic population, competes with membrane phosphotyrosyl protein targets for binding to activated Src. Our observations indicate that the interactions of Src with lipid and protein targets are dynamic and that the kinase and SH2 domain cooperate in the membrane targeting of Src.     

Modes of Interaction of Pleckstrin Homology Domains with Membranes: Toward a Computational Biochemistry of Membrane Recognition

Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains mediate protein–membrane interactions by binding to phosphatidylinositol phosphate (PIP) molecules. The structural and energetic basis of selective PH–PIP interactions is central to understanding many cellular processes, yet the molecular complexities of the PH–PIP interactions are largely unknown. Molecular dynamics simulations using a coarse-grained model enables estimation of free-energy landscapes for the interactions of 12 different PH domains with membranes containing PIP₂ or PIP₃, allowing us to obtain a detailed molecular energetic understanding of the complexities of the interactions of the PH domains with PIP molecules in membranes. Distinct binding modes, corresponding to different distributions of cationic residues on the PH domain, were observed, involving PIP interactions at either the “canonical” (C) and/or “alternate” (A) sites. PH domains can be grouped by the relative strength of their C- and A-site interactions, revealing that a higher affinity correlates with increased C-site interactions. These simulations demonstrate that simultaneous binding of multiple PIP molecules by PH domains contributes to high-affinity membrane interactions, informing our understanding of membrane recognition by PH domains in vivo.     

Non-covalent binding of membrane lipids to membrane proteins

Polar lipids and membrane proteins are major components of biological membranes, both cell membranes and membranes of enveloped viruses. How these two classes of membrane components interact with each other to influence the function of biological membranes is a fundamental question that has attracted intense interest since the origins of the field of membrane studies. One of the most powerful ideas that driven the field is the likelihood that lipids bind to membrane proteins at specific sites, modulating protein structure and function. However only relatively recently has high resolution structure determination of membrane proteins progressed to the point of providing atomic level structure of lipid binding sites on membrane proteins. Analysis of X-ray diffraction, electron crystallography and NMR data over 100 specific lipid binding sites on membrane proteins. These data demonstrate tight lipid binding of both phospholipids and cholesterol to membrane proteins. Membrane lipids bind to membrane proteins by their headgroups, or by their acyl chains, or binding is mediated by the entire lipid molecule. When headgroups bind, binding is stabilized by polar interactions between lipid headgroups and the protein. When acyl chains bind, van der Waals effects dominate as the acyl chains adopt conformations that complement particular sites on the rough protein surface. No generally applicable motifs for binding have yet emerged. Previously published biochemical and biophysical data link this binding with function. This Article is Part of a Special Issue Entitled: Membrane Structure and Function: Relevance in the Cell's Physiology, Pathology and Therapy.     

The Protein-Binding Potential of C2H2 Zinc Finger Domains

There are over 10,000 C2H2-type zinc finger (ZF) domains distributed among more than 1,000 ZF proteins in the human genome. These domains are frequently observed to be involved in sequence-specific DNA binding, and uncharacterized domains are typically assumed to facilitate DNA interactions. However, some ZFs also facilitate binding to proteins or RNA. Over 100 Cys2-His2 (C2H2) ZF-protein interactions have been described. We initially attempted a bioinformatics analysis to identify sequence features that would predict a DNA- or protein-binding function. These efforts were complicated by several issues, including uncertainties about the full functional capabilities of the ZFs. We therefore applied an unbiased approach to directly examine the potential for ZFs to facilitate DNA or protein interactions. The human OLF-1/EBF associated zinc finger (OAZ) protein was used as a model. The human O/E-1-associated zinc finger protein (hOAZ) contains 30 ZFs in 6 clusters, some of which have been previously indicated in DNA or protein interactions. DNA binding was assessed using a target site selection (CAST) assay, and protein binding was assessed using a yeast two-hybrid assay. We observed that clusters known to bind DNA could facilitate specific protein interactions, but clusters known to bind protein did not facilitate specific DNA interactions. Our primary conclusion is that DNA binding is a more restricted function of ZFs, and that their potential for mediating protein interactions is likely greater. These results suggest that the role of C2H2 ZF domains in protein interactions has probably been underestimated. The implication of these findings for the prediction of ZF function is discussed.     

Differential membrane binding and diacylglycerol recognition by C1 domains of RasGRPs

RasGRPs (guanine-nucleotide-releasing proteins) are exchange factors for membrane-bound GTPases. All RasGRP family members contain C1 domains which, in other proteins, bind DAG (diacylglycerol) and thus mediate the proximal signal-transduction events induced by this lipid second messenger. The presence of C1 domains suggests that all RasGRPs could be regulated by membrane translocation driven by C1-DAG interactions. This has been demonstrated for RasGRP1 and RasGRP3, but has not been tested directly for RasGRP2, RasGRP4alpha and RasGRP4beta. Sequence alignments indicate that all RasGRP C1 domains have the potential to bind DAG. In cells, the isolated C1 domains of RasGRP1, RasGRP3 and RasGRP4alpha co-localize with membranes and relocalize in response to DAG, whereas the C1 domains of RasGRP2 and RasGRP4beta do not. Only the C1 domains of RasGRP1, RasGRP3 and RasGRP4alpha recognize DAG as a ligand within phospholipid vesicles and do so with differential affinities. Other lipid second messengers were screened as ligands for RasGRP C1 domains, but none was found to serve as an alternative to DAG. All of the RasGRP C1 domains bound to vesicles which contained a high concentration of anionic phospholipids, indicating that this could provide a DAG-independent mechanism for membrane binding by C1 domains. This concept was supported by demonstrating that the C1 domain of RasGRP2 could functionally replace the membrane-binding role of the C1 domain within RasGRP1, despite the inability of the RasGRP2 C1 domain to bind DAG. The RasGRP4beta C1 domain was non-functional when inserted into either RasGRP1 or RasGRP4, implying that the alternative splicing which produces this C1 domain eliminates its contribution to membrane binding.     

Specificity of Membrane Binding of the Neuronal Protein NAP-22

NAP-22, a major protein of neuronal rafts is known to preferentially bind to membranes containing cholesterol. In this work we establish the requirements for membrane binding of NAP-22. We find that other sterols can replace cholesterol to promote binding. In addition, bilayers containing phosphatidylethanolamine bind NAP-22 in the absence of cholesterol. Thus, there is not a specific interaction of NAP-22 with cholesterol that determines its binding to membranes. Addition of a mol fraction of phosphatidylserine of 0.05 to membranes of phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol enhances the membrane binding of NAP-22. The dependence of binding on the mol fraction of phosphatidylserine indicates that NAP-22 binds to membranes with its amino-terminal segment closer to the membrane than the remainder of the protein. We have also determined which segments of NAP-22 are required for membrane binding. A non-myristoylated form binds only weakly to membranes. Truncating the protein from 226 amino acids to the myristoylated amino-terminal 60 amino acids does not prevent binding to membranes in a cholesterol-dependent manner, but this binding is of weaker affinity. However, myristoylation is not sufficient to promote binding to cholesterol-rich domains. An N-terminal 19-amino-acid, myristoylated peptide binds to membranes but without requiring specific lipids. Thus, the remainder of the protein contributes to the lipid specificity of the membrane binding of NAP-22.     

Position of synaptotagmin I at the membrane interface: cooperative interactions of tandem C2 domains

Synaptotagmin I is a synaptic vesicle associated membrane protein that appears to regulate Ca(2+)-mediated exocytosis. Here, the Ca(2+)-dependent membrane interactions of a water soluble fragment of synaptotagmin I (C2AB) that contains its two C2 domains (C2A and C2B) were determined using site-directed spin labeling. Membrane depth parameters were obtained for 19 spin-labeled mutants of C2AB when bound to phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylserine membranes, and these distance constraints were used in combination with the high-resolution structures of C2A and C2B to generate a model for the membrane orientation and position of synaptotagmin at the bilayer interface. Both C2A and C2B bind to the membrane interface with their first and third Ca(2+) binding loops penetrating the membrane interface. The polybasic face of C2B does not interact with the membrane lipid but is available for electrostatic interaction with other components of the fusion machinery. When compared to positions determined previously for the isolated domains, both C2A and C2B have similar orientations; however, the two domains are positioned deeper into the bilayer interior when present in the tandem construct. These data indicate that C2A and C2B do not act independently but influence their mutual membrane penetration. This may explain the occurrence of multiple C2 domains in proteins that function in membrane trafficking and repair.     

Increased membrane affinity of the C1 domain of protein kinase Cdelta compensates for the lack of involvement of its C2 domain in membrane recruitment

Protein kinase C (PKC) family members are allosterically activated following membrane recruitment by specific membrane-targeting modules. Conventional PKC isozymes are recruited to membranes by two such modules: a C1 domain, which binds diacylglycerol (DAG), and a C2 domain, which is a Ca2+-triggered phospholipid-binding module. In contrast, novel PKC isozymes respond only to DAG, despite the presence of a C2 domain. Here, we address the molecular mechanism of membrane recruitment of the novel isozyme PKCdelta. We show that PKCdelta and a conventional isozyme, PKCbetaII, bind membranes with comparable affinities. However, dissection of the contribution of individual domains to this binding revealed that, although the C2 domain is a major determinant in driving the interaction of PKCbetaII with membranes, the C2 domain of PKCdelta does not bind membranes. Instead, the C1B domain is the determinant that drives the interaction of PKCdelta with membranes. The C2 domain also does not play any detectable role in the activity or subcellular location of PKCdelta in cells; in vivo imaging studies revealed that deletion of the C2 domain does not affect the stimulus-dependent translocation or activity of PKCdelta. Thus, the increased affinity of the C1 domain of PKCdelta allows this isozyme to respond to DAG alone, whereas conventional PKC isozymes require the coordinated action of Ca2+ binding to the C2 domain and DAG binding to the C1 domain for activation.     

The role of topogenic sequences in the movement of proteins through membranes.

Recent advances have led to considerable convergence in ideas of the way topogenic sequences act to translocate proteins across various intracellular membranes (Table 2). Whereas co-translational translocation and processing were previously considered the norm at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, several instances of post-translational translocation into endoplasmic reticulum microsomes in vitro have now been described. However, it must be noted that post-translational translocation in vitro is much less efficient than when endoplasmic reticulum membranes are present during translation, and it is possible that in the intact cell translocation occurs during translation. Movement of proteins into chloroplasts and mitochondria occurs after translation. When translocation is post-translational, proteins may perhaps traverse the membrane as folded domains, and the conformational effects of topogenic sequences on these domains may be as envisaged in Wickner's 'membrane-trigger hypothesis'. Both signal and transit sequences possess amphipathic structures which are capable of interacting with phospholipid bilayers, and these interactions may disturb the bilayer sufficiently to allow entry of the following domains of protein. There is increasing evidence that GTP is required to bind ribosomes and their associated nascent chains to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Precisely how the cell's energy is applied to achieve translocation is not clear, but one possibility at the endoplasmic reticulum is that a GTP-hydrolysing transducing mechanism may exist to couple signal sequence receptor binding to movement of the nascent chain across the membrane. Electrochemical gradients are required for protein movement to the mitochondrial inner membrane and across the bacterial inner membrane. Cytoplasmic factors such as SRP, the secA gene product or a 40 kDa protein (for mitochondrial precursors) may act by binding to topogenic sequences and preventing precursor proteins as they are translated from folding into forms which cannot be translocated. Specificity in the cell may be achieved both by targetting interactions between these cytoplasmic factors and their receptors located in target membranes, and also by specific binding of the topogenic sequences to specific proteins integrated into the target membranes. Possible candidates for the latter are the protein of microsomal membranes that reacts with a photoreactive signal peptide to give a 45 kDa complex (Fig. 1), the secY gene product of the bacterial inner membrane, and receptors on the outer membranes of chloroplasts and mitochondria. Whether these aid translocation as well as recognition is not clear.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Insights into links between autophagy and the ubiquitin system from the structure of LC3B bound to the LIR motif from the E3 ligase NEDD4

Members of the LC3/GABARAP family of ubiquitin‐like proteins function during autophagy by serving as membrane linked protein‐binding platforms. Their C‐termini are physically attached to membranes through covalent linkage to primary amines on lipids such as phosphatidylethanolamine, while their ubiquitin‐like fold domains bind “LIR” (LC3‐Interacting Region) sequences found within an extraordinarily diverse array of proteins including regulators of autophagy, adaptors that recruit ubiquitinated cargoes to be degraded, and even proteins controlling processes at membranes that are not associated with autophagy. Recently, LC3/GABARAP proteins were found to bind the ubiquitin E3 ligase NEDD4 to influence ubiquitination associated with autophagy in human cell lines. Here, we use purified recombinant proteins to define LC3B interactions with a specific LIR sequence from NEDD4, present a crystal structure showing atomic details of the interaction, and show that LC3B‐binding can steer intrinsic NEDD4 E3 ligase activity. The data provide detailed molecular insights underlying recruitment of an E3 ubiquitin ligase to phagophores during autophagy.     

Synthetic peptides mimic the assembly of transmembrane glycoproteins

The composition of the intramembranous domains of many receptors are remarkably uniform, yet there is evidence that many transmembrane proteins associate together to form specific noncovalent homo- or heterocomplexes within the membrane. We have synthesized peptides corresponding to transmembrane domains of glycophorin A, glycophorin C, and the interleukin 2-receptor Tac antigen to study the interactions between transmembrane domains in vitro. Synthetic transmembrane glycophorin A peptide formed a complex with native glycophorin and glycoproteins of erythrocyte and K562 cell membranes that was reversible, specific, and could be demonstrated in a natural bilayer system in the absence of detergents. Synthetic glycophorin C and interleukin 2-receptor Tac antigen transmembrane peptides, although similar in amino acid composition, did not interact with glycophorin and did not inhibit the binding of the synthetic glycophorin A transmembrane peptide to native glycophorin. It is proposed that the transmembrane segments of receptor proteins contain not only the structural information necessary for insertion and anchoring but specific binding sites that mediate interactions between transmembrane glycoproteins.     

Molecular dynamics study of the membrane interaction of a membranotropic dengue virus C protein-derived peptide

Dengue virus C protein, essential in the dengue virus life cycle, possesses a segment, peptide PepC, known to bind membranes composed of negatively charged phospholipids. To characterize its interaction with the membrane, we have used the molecular dynamics HMMM membrane model system. This approach is capable of achieving a stable system and sampling the peptide/lipid interactions which determine the orientation and insertion of the peptide upon membrane binding. We have been able to demonstrate spontaneous binding of PepC to the 1,2-divaleryl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate/1,2-divaleryl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine membrane model system, whereas no binding was observed at all for the 1,2-divaleryl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine one. PepC, adopting an α-helix profile, did not insert into the membrane but did bind to its surface through a charge anchor formed by its three positively charged residues. PepC, maintaining its three-dimensional structure along the whole simulation, presented a nearly parallel orientation with respect to the membrane when bound to it. The positively charged amino acid residues Arg-2, Lys-6, and Arg-16 are mainly responsible for the peptide binding to the membrane stabilizing the structure of the bound peptide. The segment of dengue virus C protein where PepC resides is a fundamental protein–membrane interface which might control protein/membrane interaction, and its positive amino acids are responsible for membrane binding defining its specific location in the bound state. These data should help in our understanding of the molecular mechanism of DENV life cycle as well as making possible the future development of potent inhibitor molecules, which target dengue virus C protein structures involved in membrane binding.     

Amphitropic proteins: regulation by reversible membrane interactions (review).

What do Src kinase, Ras-guanine nucleotide exchange factor, cytidylyltransferase, protein kinase C, phospholipase C, vinculin, and DnaA protein have in common? These proteins are amphitropic, that is, they bind weakly (reversibly) to membrane lipids, and this process regulates their function. Proteins functioning in transduction of signals generated in cell membranes are commonly regulated by amphitropism. In this review, the strategies utilized by amphitropic proteins to bind to membranes and to regulate their membrane affinity are described. The recently solved structures of binding pockets for specific lipids are described, as well as the amphipathic alpha-helix motif. Regulatory switches that control membrane affinity include modulation of the membrane lipid composition, and modification of the protein itself by ligand binding, phosphorylation, or acylation. How does membrane binding modulate the protein's function? Two mechanisms are discussed: (1) localization with the substrate, activator, or downstream target, and (2) activation of the protein by a conformational switch. This paper also addresses the issue of specificity in the cell membrane targetted for binding.     

Electrostatic control of the membrane targeting of C2 domains.

Many proteins involved in signal transduction and vesicle trafficking contain C2 domains whose membrane association is often regulated by calcium. Here, finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann calculations are used to describe the electrostatic interactions between C2 domains of known structure and phospholipid membranes. The results explain how calcium binding can drive the association of some C2 domains to negatively charged membranes and others to neutral, zwitterionic membranes. Nonspecific electrostatic interactions are shown to be a general feature of many C2 domains of known structure, including the calcium-independent C2 domain of the PTEN tumor suppressor.     

Membrane targeting of C2 domains of phospholipase C-delta isoforms.

The C2 domain is a Ca(2+)-dependent membrane-targeting module found in many cellular proteins involved in signal transduction or membrane trafficking. To understand the mechanisms by which the C2 domain mediates the membrane targeting of PLC-delta isoforms, we measured the in vitro membrane binding of the C2 domains of PLC-delta1, -delta3, and -delta4 by surface plasmon resonance and monolayer techniques and their subcellular localization by time-lapse confocal microscopy. The membrane binding of the PLC-delta1-C2 is driven by nonspecific electrostatic interactions between the Ca(2+)-induced cationic surface of protein and the anionic membrane and specific interactions involving Ca(2+), Asn(647), and phosphatidylserine (PS). The PS selectivity of PLC-delta1-C2 governs its specific Ca(2+)-dependent subcellular targeting to the plasma membrane. The membrane binding of the PLC-delta3-C2 also involves Ca(2+)-induced nonspecific electrostatic interactions and PS coordination, and the latter leads to specific subcellular targeting to the plasma membrane. In contrast to PLC-delta1-C2 and PLC-delta3-C2, PLC-delta4-C2 has significant Ca(2+)-independent membrane affinity and no PS selectivity due to the presence of cationic residues in the Ca(2+)-binding loops and the substitution of Ser for the Ca(2+)-coordinating Asp in position 717. Consequently, PLC-delta4-C2 exhibits unique pre-localization to the plasma membrane prior to Ca(2+) import and non-selective Ca(2+)-mediated targeting to various cellular membranes, suggesting that PLC-delta4 might have a novel regulatory mechanism. Together, these results establish the C2 domains of PLC-delta isoforms as Ca(2+)-dependent membrane targeting domains that have distinct membrane binding properties that control their subcellular localization behaviors.     

Lateral organization of biological membranes

The lateral organization of biological membranes is of great importance in many biological processes, both for the formation of specific structures such as super-complexes and for function as observed in signal transduction systems. Over the last years, AFM studies, particularly of bacterial photosynthetic membranes, have revealed that certain proteins are able to segregate into functional domains with a specific organization. Furthermore, the extended non-random nature of the organization has been suggested to be important for the energy and redox transport properties of these specialized membranes. In the work reported here, using a coarse-grained Monte Carlo approach, we have investigated the nature of interaction potentials able to drive the formation and segregation of specialized membrane domains from the rest of the membrane and furthermore how the internal organization of the segregated domains can be modulated by the interaction potentials. These simulations show that long-range interactions are necessary to allow formation of membrane domains of realistic structure. We suggest that such possibly non-specific interactions may be of great importance in the lateral organization of biological membranes in general and in photosynthetic systems in particular. Finally, we consider the possible molecular origins of such interactions and suggest a fundamental role for lipid-mediated interactions in driving the formation of specialized photosynthetic membrane domains. We call these lipid-mediated interactions a ‘lipophobic effect.’     

Characterization of alpha-crystallin-plasma membrane binding

Alpha-crystallin, a large lenticular protein complex made up of two related subunits (alphaA- and alphaB-crystallin), is known to associate increasingly with fiber cell plasma membranes with age and/or the onset of cataract. To understand better the binding mechanism, we developed a sensitive membrane binding assay using lens plasma membranes and recombinant human alphaA- and alphaB-crystallins conjugated to a small fluorescent tag (Alexa350). Both alphaA and alphaB homopolymer complexes, as well as a reconstituted 3:1 heteromeric complex, bind to lens membranes in a specific, saturable, and partially irreversible manner that is sensitive to both time and temperature. The amount of alpha-crystallin that binds to the membrane increases under acidic pH conditions and upon removal of exposed intrinsic membrane protein domains but is not affected at high ionic strength, suggesting that alpha-crystallin binds to the fiber cell plasma membranes mainly through hydrophobic interactions. The binding capacity and affinity for the reconstituted 3:1 heteromeric complex were measured to be 3. 45 +/- 0.11 ng/microg of membrane and 4.57 +/- 0.50 x 10(-4) microg(-1) of membrane, respectively. The present membrane binding data support the hypothesis that the physical properties of a mixed alpha-crystallin complex may hold particular relevance for the function of alpha-crystallin within the lens.