普通小麦祖先种类TaNAC2a基因的生物信息和表达分析

采用生物信息学方法,利用核酸、蛋白数据库对普通小麦祖先种乌拉尔图小麦(Triticum urartu L.)和粗山羊草(Aegilops tauschii L.)NAC转录因子基因家族进行分析,分别鉴定出107、126个NAC蛋白家族成员。根据拟南芥、水稻NAC基因家族分类系统,将其分为15个亚族。通过与抗逆相关基因TaNAC2a进行同源进化树分析,发现5个TuNAC、6个AetNAC基因与其高度同源,对这些基因的蛋白结构域、基因结构、启动子顺式作用元件及组织表达特性进行分析。结果表明,11个NAC蛋白具有典型的NAC结构域。进化关系较近的基因具有相似基因结构;启动子区域预测发现其均含有逆境胁迫响应作用元件。实时荧光定量PCR结果显示,TuNAC、AetNAC基因分别在乌拉尔图小麦和粗山羊草根、胚芽鞘、叶组织中均有表达,并呈现出明显的组织表达特异性。通过芯片表达数据和逆境胁迫基因表达试验,推测AetNAC2c基因可能参与植物干旱胁迫响应,AetNAC2b可能参与调控植物的耐旱、耐低温胁迫反应。上述分析结果为普通小麦祖先种基因家族的系统研究,优异候选功能基因的预测、筛选提供了试验依据。     

5个毛果杨PtrZFP基因的鉴定和表达分析

ZFP转录因子是植物中的一类具有指环结构域的转录因子。从毛果杨中鉴定出5条ZFP基因（命名为PtrZFP1-5）,对其特性和表达模式进行了分析,以期初步了解这些基因是否能对胁迫做出应答。对PtrZFP1-5基因进行生物学分析,进一步利用qRT-PCR技术分析NaCl、PEG₆₀₀₀和ABA胁迫处理后毛果杨根、茎和叶中5条基因的表达情况。PtrZFP1-5基因编码蛋白氨基酸残基数为258~338 aa,编码蛋白的分子量为27.7~37.3 kDa,理论等电点为4.87~8.61,5个基因不均等的分布在毛果杨基因组的3条染色体上。qRT-PCR结果显示,0.2 mol·L^-1 NaCl、15%（w/v）PEG6000和100 μmol·L^-1 ABA胁迫处理后,5个PtrZFP基因在毛果杨根、茎和叶中的表达模式明显不同。PtrZFP1基因在3种胁迫后毛果杨中均被明显的上调表达;PtrZFP2基因在盐、渗透和ABA胁迫处理后,叶中的表达都明显被抑制;PtrZFP3基因受到干旱胁迫时在根中的响应最为明显;而叶和茎中,表达量在大部分胁迫的大部分时间点无明显改变。PtrZFP4基因也能在根和茎中对干旱胁迫做出明显应答。PtrZFP5基因在经受盐和ABA胁迫后,在叶中的表达受到明显抑制。PtrZFP1-5这5个基因至少能在一种器官中对一种胁迫处理做出应答,但参与的胁迫应答类型和机制可能不同。     

Responses of plants to dehydration stress: a molecular analysis

Over more than a decade molecular techniques have been applied to analyse the response of plants to drought with the objective to identify genes which contribute to drought tolerance. The studies have used a variety of experimental strategies, and they have resulted in the characterization of a large number of genes which are expressed upon dehydration. A very prominent group among these genes are the so-called Lea (=late embryogenesis abundant) genes which appear to occur ubiquitously in most higher plants. A challenge for future research is still to identify the role of the gene products in dehydration stress; it is particularly necessary to distinguish gene products with a potential in osmoprotection and those which are only involved in secondary reactions. Another area of research activities has been to elucidate the dehydration stress-triggered signal transduction and the role of ABA in this process. For this part transgenic plants have been used to evaluate promoter sequences and to characterize cis-acting regulatory promoter elements crucial for a distinct expression pattern.     

cDNA微阵列技术研究干旱胁迫下星星草基因的表达

运用cDNA微阵列技术研究干旱胁迫下星星草基因的表达。制备了载有660条星星草单一基因的cDNA微阵列。分别对干旱胁迫和对照星星草的mRNA进行荧光标记,并与载有星星草基因的cDNA微阵列进行杂交,通过芯片的杂交信号强度分析,共获得22个下调表达和17个上调表达的基因。BLASTX分析表明这些基因按功能可以分为脱水保护、信号转导与调控、活性氧清除、代谢、核糖体蛋白等几大类。发现了一些与干旱胁迫相关的功能未知基因和新基因。     

发菜PspA基因克隆及其转基因植物的抗旱性分析

为探讨发菜噬菌体休克蛋白A(PspA)的分子信息和基因功能,本研究通过设计特异引物克隆发菜PspA基因,采用qRT-PCR技术,分析发菜PspA基因在干旱胁迫下的表达模式;构建PspA真核表达载体pCAM35 s-GFP-PspA,对PspA进行亚细胞定位和PspA基因拟南芥遗传转化,并对阳性转化拟南芥分别进行Sout...     

The jasmonic acid‐signalling and abscisic acid‐signalling pathways cross talk during one,but not repeated,dehydration stress: a non‐specific ‘panicky’ or a meaningful response?

Experiencing diverse and recurring biotic and abiotic stresses throughout life, plants have evolved mechanisms to respond, survive and, eventually, adapt to changing habitats. The initial response to drought involves a large number of genes that are involved also in response to other stresses. According to current models, this initial response is non‐specific, becoming stress‐specific only at later time points. The question, then, is whether non‐specific activation of various stress‐signalling systems leading to the expression of numerous stress‐regulated genes is a false‐alarm (panicky) response or whether it has biologically relevant consequences for the plant. Here, it is argued that the initial activation of genes associated other stresses reflects an important event during which stress‐specific mechanisms are generated to prevent subsequent activation of non‐drought signalling pathways. How plants discriminate between a first and a repeated dehydration stress and how repression of non‐drought specific genes is achieved will be discussed on the example of jasmonic acid‐associated Arabidopsis genes activated by a first, but not subsequent, dehydration stresses. Revealing how expression of various biotic/abiotic stress responding genes is prevented under recurring drought spells may be critical for our understanding of how plants respond to dynamically changing environments.     

Mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Lactuca sativa plants exhibit contrasting responses to exogenous ABA during drought stress and recovery

The arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis enhances plant tolerance to water deficit through the alteration of plant physiology and the expression of plant genes. These changes have been postulated to be caused (among others) by different contents of abscisic acid (ABA) between AM and non-AM plants. However, there are no studies dealing with the effects of exogenous ABA on the expression of stress-related genes and on the physiology of AM plants. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of AM symbiosis and exogenous ABA application on plant development, physiology, and expression of several stress-related genes after both drought and a recovery period. Results show that the application of exogenous ABA had contrasting effects on AM and non-AM plants. Only AM plants fed with exogenous ABA maintained shoot biomass production unaltered by drought stress. The addition of exogenous ABA enhanced considerably the ABA content in shoots of non-AM plants, concomitantly with the expression of the stress marker genes Lsp5cs and Lslea and the gene Lsnced. By contrast, the addition of exogenous ABA decreased the content of ABA in shoots of AM plants and did not produce any further enhancement of the expression of these three genes. AM plants always exhibited higher values of root hydraulic conductivity and reduced transpiration rate under drought stress. From plants subjected to drought, only the AM plants recovered their root hydraulic conductivity completely after the 3 d recovery period. As a whole, the results indicate that AM plants regulate their ABA levels better and faster than non-AM plants, allowing a more adequate balance between leaf transpiration and root water movement during drought and recovery.