The C-terminal portion of RAG2 protects against transposition in vitro

The assembly of antigen receptor genes by V(D)J recombination is initiated by the RAG1/RAG2 protein complex, which introduces double-strand breaks between recombination signal sequences and their coding DNA. Truncated forms of RAG1 and RAG2 are functional in vivo and have been used to study V(D)J cleavage, hybrid joint formation and transposition in vitro. Here we have characterized the activities of the full-length proteins. Unlike core RAG2, which supports robust transposition in vitro, full-length RAG2 blocks transposition of signal ends following V(D)J cleavage. Thus, one role of this non-catalytic domain may be to prevent transposition in developing lymphoid cells. Although full-length RAG1 and RAG2 proteins rarely form hybrid joints in vivo in the absence of non-homologous end-joining factors, we show that the full-length proteins alone can catalyze this reaction in vitro.     

Regulation of RAG1/RAG2-mediated transposition by GTP and the C-terminal region of RAG2

The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins perform critical DNA recognition and cleavage functions in V(D)J recombination, and also catalyze efficient DNA transposition in vitro. No transposition in vivo by the RAG proteins has been reported, suggesting regulation of the reaction by as yet unknown mechanisms. Here we report that RAG-mediated transposition is suppressed by physiological concentrations of the guanine nucleotide GTP, and by the full-length RAG2 protein. Both GTP and full-length RAG2 inhibit transposition by blocking the non-covalent 'capture' of target DNA, and both are capable of inhibiting RAG-mediated hybrid joint formation in vitro. We also observe that another intracellular signaling molecule, Ca(2+), stimulates RAG-mediated transposition and is capable of activating transposition even in reactions containing full-length RAG2 and GTP. RAG-mediated transposition has been proposed to contribute to the chromosomal translocations that underlie the development of lymphoid malignancies, and our findings highlight regulatory mechanisms that might prevent such occurrences, and circumstances in which these regulatory mechanisms could be overcome.     

RAG1/2-mediated resolution of transposition intermediates: two pathways and possible consequences

During B and T cell development, the RAG1/RAG2 protein complex cleaves DNA at conserved recombination signal sequences (RSS) to initiate V(D)J recombination. RAG1/2 has also been shown to catalyze transpositional strand transfer of RSS-containing substrates into target DNA to form branched DNA intermediates. We show that RAG1/2 can resolve these intermediates by two pathways. RAG1/2 catalyzes hairpin formation on target DNA adjacent to transposed RSS ends in a manner consistent with a model leading to chromosome translocations. Alternatively, disintegration removes transposed donor DNA from the intermediate. At high magnesium concentrations, such as are present in mammalian cells, disintegration is the favored pathway of resolution. This may explain in part why RAG1/2-mediated transposition does not occur at high frequency in cells.     

Ordered DNA release and target capture in RAG transposition

Following V(D)J cleavage, the newly liberated DNA signal ends can be either fused together into a signal joint or used as donor DNA in RAG-mediated transposition. We find that both V(D)J cleavage and release of flanking coding DNA occur before the target capture step of transposition can proceed; no coding DNA is ever detected in the target capture complex. Separately from its role in V(D)J cleavage, the DDE motif of the RAG1/2 active site is specifically required for target DNA capture. The requirement for cleavage and release of coding DNA prior to either physical target binding or functional target commitment suggests that the RAG1/2 transposase contains a single binding site for non-RSS DNA that can accommodate either target DNA or coding DNA, but not both together. Perhaps the presence of coding DNA may aid in preventing transpositional resolution of V(D)J recombination intermediates.     

Distinct Roles of RAG1 and RAG2 in Binding the V(D)J Recombination Signal Sequences

The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing double-strand breaks at the border between a recombination signal sequence (RSS) and a coding segment. To understand the distinct functions of RAG1 and RAG2 in signal recognition, we have compared the DNA binding activities of RAG1 alone and RAG1 plus RAG2 by gel retardation and footprinting analyses. RAG1 exhibits only a three- to fivefold preference for binding DNA containing an RSS over random sequence DNA. Although direct binding of RAG2 by itself was not detected, the presence of both RAG1 and RAG2 results in the formation of a RAG1-RAG2-DNA complex which is more stable and more specific than the RAG1-DNA complex and is active in V(D)J cleavage. These results suggest that biologically effective discrimination between an RSS and nonspecific sequences requires both RAG1 and RAG2. Unlike the binding of RAG1 plus RAG2, RAG1 can bind to DNA in the absence of a divalent metal ion and does not require the presence of coding flank sequence. Footprinting of the RAG1-RAG2 complex with 1,10-phenanthroline-copper and dimethyl sulfate protection reveal that both the heptamer and the nonamer are involved. The nonamer is protected, with extensive protein contacts within the minor groove. Conversely, the heptamer is rendered more accessible to chemical attack, suggesting that binding of RAG1 plus RAG2 distorts the DNA near the coding/signal border.     

Assembly of the RAG1/RAG2 Synaptic Complex

Assembly of antigen receptor genes by V(D)J recombination requires the site-specific recognition of two distinct DNA elements differing in the length of the spacer DNA that separates two conserved recognition motifs. Under appropriate conditions, V(D)J cleavage by the purified RAG1/RAG2 recombinase is similarly restricted. Double-strand breakage occurs only when these proteins are bound to a pair of complementary signals in a synaptic complex. We examine here the binding of the RAG proteins to signal sequences and find that the full complement of proteins required for synapsis of two signals and coupled cleavage can assemble on a single signal. This complex, composed of a dimer of RAG2 and at least a trimer of RAG1, remains inactive for double-strand break formation until a second complementary signal is provided. Thus, binding of the second signal activates the complex, possibly by inducing a conformational change. If synaptic complexes are formed similarly in vivo, one signal of a recombining pair may be the preferred site for RAG1/RAG2 assembly.     

The RAG1 Homeodomain Recruits HMG1 and HMG2 To Facilitate Recombination Signal Sequence Binding and To Enhance the Intrinsic DNA-Bending Activity of RAG1-RAG2

V(D)J recombination is initiated by the specific binding of the RAG1-RAG2 (RAG1/2) complex to the heptamer-nonamer recombination signal sequences (RSS). Several steps of the V(D)J recombination reaction can be reconstituted in vitro with only RAG1/2 plus the high-mobility-group protein HMG1 or HMG2. Here we show that the RAG1 homeodomain directly interacts with both HMG boxes of HMG1 and HMG2 (HMG1,2). This interaction facilitates the binding of RAG1/2 to the RSS, mainly by promoting high-affinity binding to the nonamer motif. Using circular-permutation assays, we found that the RAG1/2 complex bends the RSS DNA between the heptamer and nonamer motifs. HMG1,2 significantly enhance the binding and bending of the 23RSS but are not essential for the formation of a bent DNA intermediate on the 12RSS. A transient increase of HMG1,2 concentration in transfected cells increases the production of the final V(D)J recombinants in vivo.     

Joining-deficient RAG1 mutants block V(D)J recombination in vivo and hairpin opening in vitro

The RAG proteins cleave at V(D)J recombination signal sequences then form a postcleavage complex with the broken ends. The role of this complex in end processing and joining, if any, is undefined. We have identified two RAG1 mutants proficient for DNA cleavage but severely defective for coding and signal joint formation, providing direct evidence that RAG1 is critical for joining in vivo and strongly suggesting that the postcleavage complex is important in end joining. We have also identified a RAG1 mutant that is severely defective for both hairpin opening in vitro and coding joint formation in vivo. These data suggest that the hairpin opening activity of the RAG proteins plays an important physiological role in V(D)J recombination.     

Effect of CpG methylation on RAG1/RAG2 reactivity: implications of direct and indirect mechanisms for controlling V(D)J cleavage

It has been suggested that DNA methylation/demethylation is involved in regulating V(D)J rearrangement. Although methylated DNA is thought to induce an inaccessible chromatin structure, it is unclear whether DNA methylation can directly control V(D)J recombination independently of chromatin structure. In this study, we tested whether DNA methylation directly affects the reactivity of the RAG1/RAG2 complex. Specific methylation within the heptamer of the recombination signal sequences (RSS) markedly reduced V(D)J cleavage without inhibiting RAG1/RAG2–DNA complex formation. By contrast, methylation at other positions around the RSS did not affect the reactivity of the RAG proteins. The presence of a methyl-CpG binding-domain protein inhibited the binding of the RAG1/RAG2 complex to all the methylated CpG sites that were tested. Our findings suggest that DNA methylation around the RSS may have a previously unexpected function in regulating V(D)J recombination by directly inhibiting V(D)J cleavage, in addition to its general function of inducing an inaccessible chromatin configuration.     

Cell cycle-dependent accumulation in vivo of transposition-competent complexes between recombination signal ends and full-length RAG proteins

V(D)J recombination is initiated by a specialized transposase consisting of RAG-1 and RAG-2. Because full-length RAG proteins are insoluble under physiologic conditions, most previous analyses of RAG activity in vitro have used truncated core RAG-1 and RAG-2 fragments. These studies identified an intermediate in V(D)J recombination, the signal end complex (SEC), in which core RAG proteins remain associated with recombination signal sequences at the cleaved signal ends. From transfected cells expressing affinity-tagged RAG proteins, we have isolated in vivo assembled SECs containing full-length RAG proteins and cleaved recombination substrates. SEC formation in vivo did not require the repair proteins DNA-dependent protein kinase, Ku80, or XRCC4. In the presence of full-length RAG-2, SEC formation in vivo was cell cycle-regulated and restricted to the G(0)/G(1) phases. In contrast, complexes accumulated throughout cell cycle in cells expressing a RAG-2 CDK2 phosphorylation site mutant. Both core and full-length SECs supported transposition in vitro with similar efficiencies. Intracellular SECs, which are likely to persist in the absence of coding ends, represent potential donors whose transposition is not suppressed by the non-core regions of the RAG proteins.     

Repair of chromosomal RAG-mediated DNA breaks by mutant RAG proteins lacking phosphatidylinositol 3-like kinase consensus phosphorylation sites

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunits (DNA-PKcs) are members of the phosphatidylinositol 3-like family of serine/threonine kinases that phosphorylate serines or threonines when positioned adjacent to a glutamine residue (SQ/TQ). Both kinases are activated rapidly by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and regulate the function of proteins involved in DNA damage responses. In developing lymphocytes, DSBs are generated during V(D)J recombination, which is required to assemble the second exon of all Ag receptor genes. This reaction is initiated through a DNA cleavage step by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, which together comprise an endonuclease that generates DSBs at the border of two recombining gene segments and their flanking recombination signals. This DNA cleavage step is followed by a joining step, during which pairs of DNA coding and signal ends are ligated to form a coding joint and a signal joint, respectively. ATM and DNA-PKcs are integrally involved in the repair of both signal and coding ends, but the targets of these kinases involved in the repair process have not been fully elucidated. In this regard, the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, which each have several SQ/TQ motifs, have been implicated in the repair of RAG-mediated DSBs. In this study, we use a previously developed approach for studying chromosomal V(D)J recombination that has been modified to allow for the analysis of RAG1 and RAG2 function. We show that phosphorylation of RAG1 or RAG2 by ATM or DNA-PKcs at SQ/TQ consensus sites is dispensable for the joining step of V(D)J recombination.     

Target DNA structure plays a critical role in RAG transposition

Antigen receptor gene rearrangements are initiated by the RAG1/2 protein complex, which recognizes specific DNA sequences termed RSS (recombination signal sequences). The RAG recombinase can also catalyze transposition: integration of a DNA segment bounded by RSS into an unrelated DNA target. For reasons that remain poorly understood, such events occur readily in vitro, but are rarely detected in vivo. Previous work showed that non-B DNA structures, particularly hairpins, stimulate transposition. Here we show that the sequence of the four nucleotides at a hairpin tip modulates transposition efficiency over a surprisingly wide (>100-fold) range. Some hairpin targets stimulate extraordinarily efficient transposition (up to 15%); one serves as a potent and specific transposition inhibitor, blocking capture of targets and destabilizing preformed target capture complexes. These findings suggest novel regulatory possibilities and may provide insight into the activities of other transposases.     

DNA-dependent protein kinase mediates V(D)J recombination via RAG2 phosphorylation

V(D)J recombination, a site-specific gene rearrangement process occurring during the lymphocyte development, begins with DNA double strand breaks by two recombination activating gene products (RAG1/2) and finishes with the repair process by several proteins including DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). In this report, we found that RAG2 was specifically phosphorylated by DNA-PK at the 365(th) serine residue, and this phosphorylated RAG2 affected the V(D)J recombination activity in cells in the GFP expression-based assay. While the V(D)J recombination activity between wild-type RAG2 and mutant S365A RAG2 in the assay using a signal joint substrate was undistinguishable in DNA-PK deficient cells (M059J), the activity with wild-type RAG2 was largely increased in DNA-PK proficient cells (M059K) in comparison with mutant RAG2, suggesting that RAG2 phosphorylation by DNA-PK plays a crucial role in the signal joint formation during V(D)J recombination.     

Cooperative recruitment of HMGB1 during V(D)J recombination through interactions with RAG1 and DNA

During V(D)J recombination, recombination activating gene (RAG)1 and RAG2 bind and cleave recombination signal sequences (RSSs), aided by the ubiquitous DNA-binding/-bending proteins high-mobility group box protein (HMGB)1 or HMGB2. HMGB1/2 play a critical, although poorly understood, role in vitro in the assembly of functional RAG–RSS complexes, into which HMGB1/2 stably incorporate. The mechanism of HMGB1/2 recruitment is unknown, although an interaction with RAG1 has been suggested. Here, we report data demonstrating only a weak HMGB1–RAG1 interaction in the absence of DNA in several assays, including fluorescence anisotropy experiments using a novel Alexa488-labeled HMGB1 protein. Addition of DNA to RAG1 and HMGB1 in fluorescence anisotropy experiments, however, results in a substantial increase in complex formation, indicating a synergistic binding effect. Pulldown experiments confirmed these results, as HMGB1 was recruited to a RAG1–DNA complex in a RAG1 concentration-dependent manner and, interestingly, without strict RSS sequence specificity. Our finding that HMGB1 binds more tightly to a RAG1–DNA complex over RAG1 or DNA alone provides an explanation for the stable integration of this typically transient architectural protein in the V(D)J recombinase complex throughout recombination. These findings also have implications for the order of events during RAG–DNA complex assembly and for the stabilization of sequence-specific and non-specific RAG1–DNA interactions.     

DNA mismatches and GC-rich motifs target transposition by the RAG1/RAG2 transposase

In addition to their essential role in V(D)J recombination, the RAG proteins function as a transposase capable of inserting the V(D)J recombination intermediate, the signal end DNA fragment, into target DNA. RAG-mediated transposition has been suggested to contribute to genome instability and the development of lymphoid malignancies. Previous studies suggested that the RAG transposase exhibits a target site preference for GC rich sequences and hairpin structures. Here we demonstrate that a transposition hot spot (5′-GCCGCCGGGCC-3′), smaller portions of this hot spot and other GC rich motifs are able to target RAG-mediated transposition. Tracks of GC base pairs have been shown to have an unusually high rate of base pair breathing. Intriguingly, we find that DNA mismatches can efficiently target RAG-mediated transposition and suppress the use of other target sites. Hairpins, however, are not generally preferred targets. Our results indicate that target DNA melting may be a crucial step during RAG-mediated transposition, and that target site selection by the RAG transposase may be intimately linked to mutagenic and metabolic processes that transiently present favorable DNA structures to the transposition machinery.     

An interdomain boundary in RAG1 facilitates cooperative binding to RAG2 in formation of the V(D)J recombinase complex

V(D)J recombination assembles functional antigen receptor genes during lymphocyte development. Formation of the recombination complex containing the recombination activating proteins, RAG1 and RAG2, is essential for the site-specific DNA cleavage steps in V(D)J recombination. However, little is known concerning how complex formation leads to a catalytically-active complex. Here, we combined limited proteolysis and mass spectrometry methods to identify regions of RAG1 that are sequestered upon association with RAG2. These results show that RAG2 bridges an interdomain boundary in the catalytic region of RAG1. In a second approach, mutation of RAG1 residues within the interdomain boundary were tested for disruption of RAG1:RAG2 complex formation using fluorescence-based pull down assays. The core RAG1 mutants demonstrated varying effects on complex formation with RAG2. Interestingly, two mutants showed opposing results for the ability to interact with core versus full length RAG2, indicating that the non-core region of RAG2 participates in binding to core RAG1. Significantly, all of the RAG1 interdomain mutants demonstrated altered stoichiometries of the RAG complexes, with an increased number of RAG2 per RAG1 subunit compared to the wild type complex. Based on our results, we propose that interaction of RAG2 with RAG1 induces cooperative interactions of multiple binding sites, induced through conformational changes at the RAG1 interdomain boundary, and resulting in formation of the DNA cleavage active site.     

A RAG1 and RAG2 Tetramer Complex Is Active in Cleavage in V(D)J Recombination

During V(D)J recombination two proteins, RAG1 and RAG2, assemble as a protein-DNA complex with the appropriate DNA targets containing recombination signal sequences (RSSs). The properties of this complex require a fairly elaborate set of protein-protein and protein-DNA contacts. Here we show that a purified derivative of RAG1, without DNA, exists predominantly as a homodimer. A RAG2 derivative alone has monomer, dimer, and larger forms. The coexpressed RAG1 and RAG2 proteins form a mixed tetramer in solution which contains two molecules of each protein. The same tetramer of RAG1 and RAG2 plus one DNA molecule is the form active in cleavage. Additionally, we show that both DNA products following cleavage can still be held together in a stable protein-DNA complex.     

Joining mutants of RAG1 and RAG2 that demonstrate impaired interactions with the coding-end DNA

In V(D)J joining of antigen receptor genes, two recombination signal sequences (RSSs), 12- and 23-RSSs, form a complex with the protein products of recombination activating genes, RAG1 and RAG2. DNaseI footprinting demonstrates that the interaction of RAG proteins with substrate RSS DNA is not just limited to the signal region but involves the coding sequence as well. Joining mutants of RAG1 and RAG2 demonstrate impaired interactions with the coding region in both pre- and postcleavage type complexes. A possible role of this RAG coding region interaction is discussed in the context of V(D)J recombination.     

DNA Hairpin Opening Mediated by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins

The lymphoid cell-specific proteins RAG1 and RAG2 initiate V(D)J recombination by cleaving DNA adjacent to recombination signals, generating blunt signal ends and covalently sealed, hairpin coding ends. A critical next step in the reaction is opening of the hairpins, but the factor(s) responsible has not been identified and had been thought to be a ubiquitous component(s) of the DNA repair machinery. Here we demonstrate that RAG1 and RAG2 possess an intrinsic single-stranded nuclease activity capable of nicking hairpin coding ends at or near the hairpin tip. In Mn2+, a synthetic hairpin is nicked 5 nucleotides (nt) 5' of the hairpin tip, with more distant sites of nicking suppressed by HMG2. In Mg2+, hairpins generated by V(D)J cleavage are nicked whereas synthetic hairpins are not. Cleavage-generated hairpins are nicked at the tip and predominantly 1 to 2 nt 5' of the tip. RAG1 and RAG2 may therefore be responsible for initiating the processing of coding ends and for the generation of P nucleotides during V(D)J recombination.     

Amino acid residues in RAG1 responsible for the interaction with RAG2 during the V(D)J recombination process

The V(D)J recombinase, a complex of RAG1 and RAG2, carries out a gene rearrangement process that is required for the achievement of diverse antigen receptor repertoires during the early developmental stage of lymphocytes. It recognizes a specific site spanning the coding DNA region of antigen receptor genes and produces double-stranded DNA breaks at the board between coding and signal sequences. Two broken DNA ends are joined by a double-stranded break repair system. Both RAG (recombination activation gene) 1 and RAG2 proteins are absolutely required for this process although the catalytic residues of V(D)J recombinase are exclusively located at RAG1 according to recent mutational analyses. In this study we identified some acidic amino acid residues in RAG1 responsible for the interaction with RAG2. Mutation on these residues caused a decrease of cleavage activity in vitro and failure of RAG-RSS DNA synaptic complex formation. This result is complementary to previous reports in which positively charged amino acids in RAG2 play an important role in RAG1 binding.