Identification of the different intermediates in the interaction of (A)BC excinuclease with its substrates by DNase I footprinting on two uniquely modified oligonucleotides

(A)BC excinuclease is the enzymatic activity resulting from the joint actions of UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins of Escherichia coli. The enzyme removes from DNA many types of adducts of dissimilar structures with different efficiencies. To understand the mechanism of substrate recognition and the basis of enzyme specificity, we investigated the interactions of the three subunits with two synthetic substrates, one containing a psoralen-thymine monoadduct and the other a thymine dimer. Using DNase I as a probe, we found that UvrA makes a 33 base-pair footprint around the psoralen-thymine adduct and that UvrA-UvrB make a 45 base-pair asymmetric footprint characterized by a hypersensitive site 11 nucleotides 5' to the adduct and protection mostly on the 3' side of the damage. Conditions that favor dissociation of UvrA from the UvrA-UvrB-DNA complex, such as addition of excess undamaged DNA to the reaction mixture, resulted in the formation of a 19 base-pair UvrB footprint. In contrast, a thymine dimer in a similar sequence context failed to elicit a UvrA, a UvrA-UvrB or UvrB footprint and gave rise to a relatively weak DNase I hypersensitive site typical of a UvrA-UvrB complex. Dissociation of UvrA from the UvrA-UvrB-DNA complex stimulated the rate of incision of both substrates upon addition of UvrC, leading us to conclude that UvrA is not a part of the incision complex and that it actually interferes with incision. The extent of incision of the two substrates upon addition of UvrC (70% for the psoralen adduct and 20% for the thymine dimer) was proportional to the extent of formation of the UvrA-UvrB-DNA (i.e. UvrB-DNA) complex, indicating that substrate discrimination occurs at the preincision step.     

Role of the two ATPase domains of Escherichia coli UvrA in binding non-bulky DNA lesions and interaction with UvrB

The UvrA protein is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and detects a wide variety of structurally unrelated lesions. After initial recognition of DNA damage, UvrA loads the UvrB protein onto the DNA. This protein then verifies the presence of a lesion, after which UvrA is released from the DNA.UvrA contains two ATPase domains, both belonging to the ABC ATPase superfamily. We have determined the activities of two mutants, in which a single domain was deactivated. Inactivation of either one ATPase domain in Escherichia coli UvrA results in a complete loss of ATPase activity, indicating that both domains function in a cooperative way. We could show that this ATPase activity is not required for the recognition of bulky lesions by UvrA, but it does promote the specific binding to the less distorting cyclobutane–pyrimidine dimer (CPD). The two ATPase mutants also show a difference in UvrB-loading, depending on the length of the DNA substrate. The ATPase domain I mutant was capable of loading UvrB on a lesion in a 50 bp fragment, but this loading was reduced on a longer substrate. For the ATPase domain II mutant the opposite was found: UvrB could not be loaded on a 50 bp substrate, but this loading was rescued when the length of the fragment was increased. This differential loading of UvrB by the two ATPase mutants could be related to different interactions between the UvrA and UvrB subunits.     

Architecture of nucleotide excision repair complexes: DNA is wrapped by UvrB before and after damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair mechanism that recognizes a broad range of DNA damages. In Escherichia coli, damage recognition in NER is accomplished by the UvrA and UvrB proteins. We have analysed the structural properties of the different protein-DNA complexes formed by UvrA, UvrB and (damaged) DNA using atomic force microscopy. Analysis of the UvrA(2)B complex in search of damage revealed the DNA to be wrapped around the UvrB protein, comprising a region of about seven helical turns. In the UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex the DNA is wrapped in a similar way and this DNA configuration is dependent on ATP binding. Based on these results, a role for DNA wrapping in damage recognition is proposed. Evidence is presented that DNA wrapping in the pre-incision complex also stimulates the rate of incision by UvrC.     

Dynamics of the UvrABC nucleotide excision repair proteins analyzed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

UvrB plays a key role in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. It is the ultimate damage-binding protein that interacts with both UvrA and UvrC. The oligomeric state of UvrB and the UvrAB complex have been subject of debate for a long time. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between GFP and YFP fused to the C-terminal end of Escherichia coli UvrB, we unambiguously show that in solution two UvrB subunits bind to UvrA, most likely as part of a UvrA2B2 complex. This complex is most stable when both UvrA and UvrB are in the ATP-bound form. Analysis of a truncated form of UvrB shows that binding to UvrA promotes dimerization of the two C-terminal domain 4 regions of UvrB. The presence of undamaged DNA leads to dissociation of the UvrA2B2 complex, but when the ATPase site of UvrB is inactivated, the complex is trapped on the DNA. When the complex is bound to a damaged site, FRET between the two UvrB subunits could still be detected, but only as long as UvrA remains associated. Dissociation of UvrA from the damage-bound UvrB dimer leads to the reduction of the magnitude of the FRET signal, indicating that the domain 4 regions no longer interact. We propose that the UvrA-induced dimerization of the domain 4 regions serves to shield these domains from premature UvrC binding. Only after specific binding of the UvrB dimer to a damaged site and subsequent release of UvrA is the contact between the domain 4 regions broken, allowing recruitment of UvrC and subsequent incisions.     

Electron microscopic study of (A)BC excinuclease. DNA is sharply bent in the UvrB-DNA complex.

Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli is initiated by the UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins. UvrA is the damage recognition subunit, makes an A2B1 complex with the targeting subunit UvrB, and the complex binds to the lesion site; UvrA dissociates leaving behind a very stable UvrB-DNA complex that is recognized by the trigger subunit, UvrC, and the ensuing UvrB-UvrC heterodimer makes two incisions, one on either side of the lesion. Using electron microscopy, we investigated the structures of these early A, A-B intermediates on DNA containing ultraviolet light photoproducts. UvrA, which is known to bind to DNA as a dimer and produce a DNase I footprint of 33 base-pairs does not change the trajectory of DNA appreciably. The A2B1 complex clearly shows a bipartite structure and its effect on the trajectory of the DNA was not consistently straight or kinked. In contrast, the DNA in the preincision UvrB-DNA complex appears to be severely kinked; 43% of the molecules are bent by 80 degrees or more, with an average bending angle of 127 degrees. It appears that protein-induced bending is an important step on the pathway leading to excision of the damaged nucleotide by (A)BC excinuclease.     

The effect of the DNA flanking the lesion on formation of the UvrB-DNA preincision complex. Mechanism for the UvrA-mediated loading of UvrB onto a DNA damaged site

The UvrB-DNA preincision complex plays a key role in nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. To study the formation of this complex, derivatives of a DNA substrate containing a cholesterol adduct were constructed. Introduction of a single strand nick into either the top or the bottom strand at the 3' side of the adduct stabilized the UvrB-DNA complex, most likely by the release of local stress in the DNA. Removal of both DNA strands up to the 3' incision site still allowed formation of the preincision complex. Similar modifications at the 5' side of the damage, however, gave different results. The introduction of a single strand nick at the 5' incision site completely abolished the UvrA-mediated formation of the UvrB-DNA complex. Deletion of both DNA strands up to the 5' incision site also prevented the UvrA-mediated loading of UvrB onto the damaged site, but UvrB by itself could bind very efficiently. This demonstrates that the UvrB protein is capable of recognizing damage without the matchmaker function of the UvrA protein. Our results also indicate that the UvrA-mediated loading of the UvrB protein is an asymmetric process, which starts at the 5' side of the damage.     

DNA damage recognition of mutated forms of UvrB proteins in nucleotide excision repair

The DNA repair protein UvrB plays an indispensable role in the stepwise and sequential damage recognition of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. Our previous studies suggested that UvrB is responsible for the chemical damage recognition only upon a strand opening mediated by UvrA. Difficulties were encountered in studying the direct interaction of UvrB with adducts due to the presence of UvrA. We report herein that a single point mutation of Y95W in which a tyrosine is replaced by a tryptophan results in an UvrB mutant that is capable of efficiently binding to structure-specific DNA adducts even in the absence of UvrA. This mutant is fully functional in the UvrABC incisions. The dissociation constant for the mutant-DNA adduct interaction was less than 100 nM at physiological temperatures as determined by fluorescence spectroscopy. In contrast, similar substitutions at other residues in the beta-hairpin with tryptophan or phenylalanine do not confer UvrB such binding ability. Homology modeling of the structure of E. coli UvrB shows that the aromatic ring of residue Y95 and only Y95 directly points into the DNA binding cleft. We have also examined UvrB recognition of both "normal" bulky BPDE-DNA and protein-cross-linked DNA (DPC) adducts and the roles of aromatic residues of the beta-hairpin in the recognition of these lesions. A mutation of Y92W resulted in an obvious decrease in the efficiency of UvrABC incisions of normal adducts, while the incision of the DPC adduct is dramatically increased. Our results suggest that Y92 may function differently with these two types of adducts, while the Y95 residue plays an unique role in stabilizing the interaction of UvrB with DNA damage, most likely by a hydrophobic stacking.     

Repair of DNA-containing pyrimidine dimers

Ultraviolet light-induced pyrimidine dimers in DNA are recognized and repaired by a number of unique cellular surveillance systems. The most direct biochemical mechanism responding to this kind of genotoxicity involves direct photoreversal by flavin enzymes that specifically monomerize pyrimidine:pyrimidine dimers monophotonically in the presence of visible light. Incision reactions are catalyzed by a combined pyrimidine dimer DNA-glycosylase:apyrimidinic endonuclease found in some highly UV-resistant organisms. At a higher level of complexity, Escherichia coli has a uvr DNA repair system comprising the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins responsible for incision. There are several preincision steps governed by this pathway, which includes an ATP-dependent UvrA dimerization reaction required for UvrAB nucleoprotein formation. This complex formation driven by ATP binding is associated with localized topological unwinding of DNA. This same protein complex can catalyze an ATPase-dependent 5'----3'-directed strand displacement of D-loop DNA or short single strands annealed to a single-stranded circular or linear DNA. This putative translocational process is arrested when damaged sites are encountered. The complex is now primed for dual incision catalyzed by UvrC. The remainder of the repair process involves UvrD (helicase II) and DNA polymerase I for a coordinately controlled excision-resynthesis step accompanied by UvrABC turnover. Furthermore, it is proposed that levels of repair proteins can be regulated by proteolysis. UvrB is converted to truncated UvrB* by a stress-induced protease that also acts at similar sites on the E. coli Ada protein. Although UvrB* can bind with UvrA to DNA, it cannot participate in helicase or incision reactions. It is also a DNA-dependent ATPase.     

The role of ATP binding and hydrolysis by UvrB during nucleotide excision repair

We have isolated UvrB-DNA complexes by capture of biotinylated damaged DNA substrates on streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. With this method the UvrB-DNA preincision complex remains stable even in the absence of ATP. For the binding of UvrC to the UvrB-DNA complex no cofactor is needed. The subsequent induction of 3' incision does require ATP binding by UvrB but not hydrolysis. This ATP binding induces a conformational change in the DNA, resulting in the appearance of the DNase I-hypersensitive site at the 5' side of the damage. In contrast, the 5' incision is not dependent on ATP binding because it occurs with the same efficiency with ADP. We show with competition experiments that both incision reactions are induced by the binding of the same UvrC molecule. A DNA substrate containing damage close to the 5' end of the damaged strand is specifically bound by UvrB in the absence of UvrA and ATP (Moolenaar, G. F., Monaco, V., van der Marel, G. A., van Boom, J. H., Visse, R., and Goosen, N. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8038-8043). To initiate the formation of an active UvrBC-DNA incision complex, however, UvrB first needs to hydrolyze ATP, and subsequently a new ATP molecule must be bound. Implications of these findings for the mechanism of the UvrA-mediated formation of the UvrB-DNA preincision complex will be discussed.     

Deletion mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli UvrA protein localizes domains for DNA binding, damage recognition, and protein-protein interactions.

The UvrA protein is the DNA binding and damage recognition subunit of the damage-specific UvrABC endonuclease. In addition, it is an ATPase/GTPase, and the binding energy of ATP is linked to dimerization of the UvrA protein. Furthermore, the UvrA protein interacts with the UvrB protein to modulate its activities, both in solution and in association with DNA, where the UvrAB complex possesses a helicase activity. The domains of the UvrA protein that sponsor each of these activities were localized within the protein by studying the in vitro properties of a set of purified deletion mutants of the UvrA protein. A region located within the first 230 amino acids was found to contain the minimal region necessary for interactions with UvrB, the UvrA dimerization interface was localized to within the first 680 amino acids, and the DNA binding domain lies within the first 900 amino acids of the 940-amino acid UvrA protein. Two damage recognition domains were detected. The first domain, which coincides with the DNA binding region, is required to detect the damage. The second domain, located on or near the C-terminal 40 amino acids, stabilizes the protein-DNA complex when damage is encountered.     

Role of the insertion domain and the zinc-finger motif of Escherichia coli UvrA in damage recognition and ATP hydrolysis

UvrA is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each protomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase domains, that belong to the family of ATP-binding cassette domains. Three structural domains are inserted in these ATPase domains: the insertion domain (ID) and UvrB binding domain (in ATP domain I) and the zinc-finger motif (in ATP domain II). In this paper we analyze the function of the ID and the zinc finger motif in damage specific binding of Escherichia coli UvrA. We show that the ID is not essential for damage discrimination, but it does stabilize UvrA on the DNA, most likely by forming a clamp around the DNA helix. We present evidence that two conserved arginine residues in the ID contact the phosphate backbone of the DNA, leading to strand separation after the ATPase-driven movement of the ID's. Remarkably, deletion of the ID generated a phenotype in which UV-survival strongly depends on the presence of photolyase, indicating that UvrA and photolyase form a ternary complex on a CPD-lesion. The zinc-finger motif is shown to be important for the transfer of the damage recognition signal to the ATPase of UvrA. In the absence of this domain the coupling between DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis is completely lost. Mutation of the phenylalanine residue in the tip of the zinc-finger domain resulted in a protein in which the ATPase was already triggered when binding to an undamaged site. As the zinc-finger motif is connected to the DNA binding regions on the surface of UvrA, this strongly suggests that damage-specific binding to these regions results in a rearrangement of the zinc-finger motif, which in its turn activates the ATPase. We present a model how damage recognition is transmitted to activate ATP hydrolysis in ATP binding domain I of the protein.     

The nucleotide excision repair protein UvrB, a helicase-like enzyme with a catch

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a universal DNA repair mechanism found in all three kingdoms of life. Its ability to repair a broad range of DNA lesions sets NER apart from other repair mechanisms. NER systems recognize the damaged DNA strand and cleave it 3', then 5' to the lesion. After the oligonucleotide containing the lesion is removed, repair synthesis fills the resulting gap. UvrB is the central component of bacterial NER. It is directly involved in distinguishing damaged from undamaged DNA and guides the DNA from recognition to repair synthesis. Recently solved structures of UvrB from different organisms represent the first high-resolution view into bacterial NER. The structures provide detailed insight into the domain architecture of UvrB and, through comparison, suggest possible domain movements. The structure of UvrB consists of five domains. Domains 1a and 3 bind ATP at the inter-domain interface and share high structural similarity to helicases of superfamilies I and II. Not related to helicase structures, domains 2 and 4 are involved in interactions with either UvrA or UvrC, whereas domain 1b was implicated for DNA binding. The structures indicate that ATP binding and hydrolysis is associated with domain motions. UvrB's ATPase activity, however, is not coupled to the separation of long DNA duplexes as in helicases, but rather leads to the formation of the preincision complex with the damaged DNA substrate. The location of conserved residues and structural comparisons with helicase-DNA structures suggest how UvrB might bind to DNA. A model of the UvrB-DNA interaction in which a beta-hairpin of UvrB inserts between the DNA double strand has been proposed recently. This padlock model is developed further to suggest two distinct consequences of domain motion: in the UvrA(2)B-DNA complex, domain motions lead to translocation along the DNA, whereas in the tight UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex, they lead to distortion of the 3' incision site.     

Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling

To better define the molecular architecture of nucleotide excision repair intermediates it is necessary to identify the specific domains of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC that are in close proximity to DNA damage during the repair process. One key step of nucleotide excision repair that is poorly understood is the transfer of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB, prior to incision by UvrC. To study this transfer, we have utilized two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity reagents that probe residues in the Uvr proteins that are closest to either the damaged or non-damaged strands. The damaged strand probes consisted of dNTP analogs linked to a terminal arylazido moiety. These analogs were incorporated into double-stranded DNA using DNA polymerase beta and functioned as both the damage site and the cross-linking reagent. The non-damaged strand probe contained an arylazido moiety coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Six site-directed mutants of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB located in different domains within the protein (Y96A, E99A, R123A, R183E, F249A, and D510A), and two domain deletions (Delta2 and Deltabeta-hairpin), were assayed. Data gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a three-step process: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to the damaged site, with UvrA in direct contact; 2) a transfer reaction with UvrB contacting mostly the non-damaged DNA strand; 3) lesion engagement by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB with concomitant release of UvrA.     

Interactions between UvrA and UvrB: the role of UvrB's domain 2 in nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism present in all kingdoms of life. UvrB is a central component of the bacterial NER system, participating in damage recognition, strand excision and repair synthesis. None of the three presently available crystal structures of UvrB has defined the structure of domain 2, which is critical for the interaction with UvrA. We have solved the crystal structure of the UvrB Y96A variant, which reveals a new fold for domain 2 and identifies highly conserved residues located on its surface. These residues are restricted to the face of UvrB important for DNA binding and may be critical for the interaction of UvrB with UvrA. We have mutated these residues to study their role in the incision reaction, formation of the pre-incision complex, destabilization of short duplex regions in DNA, binding to UvrA and ATP hydrolysis. Based on the structural and biochemical data, we conclude that domain 2 is required for a productive UvrA-UvrB interaction, which is a pre-requisite for all subsequent steps in nucleotide excision repair.     

Analysis of UvrABC endonuclease reaction intermediates on cisplatin-damaged DNA using mobility shift gel electrophoresis.

One of the least understood steps in the UvrABC mediated excision repair process is the recognition of lesions in the DNA. The isolation of different reaction intermediates is of vital importance for the unraveling of the mechanism. A mobility shift gel electrophoresis assay is described which visualizes such intermediates. After incubation of a DNA substrate containing a specific cisplatin adduct with UvrA alone or with UvrA and UvrB, UvrA.DNA, UvrAB.DNA and UvrB.DNA complexes were observed which could be identified using specific antibodies. At low UvrA concentrations in the presence of UvrB only the UvrB.DNA complex is observed. Bands corresponding to the UvrAB.DNA complex and also other nonspecific bands are found at relatively high UvrA concentrations. The DNase-I footprint for the UvrAB.- and UvrB.DNA complex are very similar and protect about 20 bases. Both complexes are incised in the presence of UvrC with comparable efficiency. The UvrAB.- and the UvrB.DNA complex were both incised at the 8th phosphodiester bond 5' to a specific cisplatin adduct. In addition the UvrAB.DNA complex could also be incised at the 15th phosphodiesterbond 5' to the damaged site. The results suggest that the UvrB.DNA complex is the natural substrate for UvrC-induced incision.     

DNase I footprint of ABC excinuclease

The incision and excision steps of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli are mediated by ABC excinuclease, a multisubunit enzyme composed of three proteins, UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. To determine the DNA contact sites and the binding affinity of ABC excinuclease for damaged DNA, it is necessary to engineer a DNA fragment uniquely modified at one nucleotide. We have recently reported the construction of a 40 base pair (bp) DNA fragment containing a psoralen adduct at a central TpA sequence (Van Houten, B., Gamper, H., Hearst, J. E., and Sancar, A. (1986a) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 14135-14141). Using similar methodology a 137-bp fragment containing a psoralen-thymine adduct was synthesized, and this substrate was used in DNase I-footprinting experiments with the subunits of ABC excinuclease. It was found that the UvrA subunit binds specifically to the psoralen modified 137-bp fragment with an apparent equilibrium constant of K8 = 0.7 - 1.5 X 10(8) M-1, while protecting a 33-bp region surrounding the DNA adduct. The equilibrium constant for the nonspecific binding of UvrA was Kns = 0.7 - 2.9 X 10(5) M-1 (bp). In the presence of the UvrB subunit, the binding affinity of UvrA for the damaged substrate increased to K8 = 1.2 - 6.7 X 10(8) M-1 while the footprint shrunk to 19 bp. In addition the binding of the UvrA and UvrB subunits to the damaged substrate caused the 11th phosphodiester bond 5' to the psoralen-modified thymine to become hypersensitive to DNase I cleavage. These observations provide evidence of an alteration in the DNA conformation which occurs during the formation of the ternary UvrA.UvrB.DNA complex. The addition of the UvrC subunit to the UvrA.UvrB.DNA complex resulted in incisions on both sides of the adduct but did not cause any detectable change in the footprint. Experiments with shorter psoralen-modified DNA fragments (20-40 bp) indicated that ABC excinuclease is capable of incising a DNA fragment extending either 3 or 1 bp beyond the normal 5' or 3' incision sites, respectively. These results suggest that the DNA beyond the incision sites, while contributing to ABC excinuclease-DNA complex formation, is not essential for cleavage to occur.     

A Structural Model for the Damage-sensing Complex in Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair

Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a wide range of structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In bacteria, damage recognition is achieved by the UvrA·UvrB ensemble. Here, we report the structure of the complex between the interaction domains of UvrA and UvrB. These domains are necessary and sufficient for full-length UvrA and UvrB to associate and thereby form the DNA damage-sensing complex of bacterial nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure and accompanying biochemical analyses suggest a model for the complete damage-sensing complex.Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a diverse set of lesions. In bacteria, the initial steps are carried out by three proteins: UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. The UvrA·UvrB complex conducts surveillance of DNA and recognizes damage. Having located a lesion, UvrA “loads” UvrB onto the DNA at the damaged sites and then dissociates. Damage searching, formation of the UvrB·DNA “preincision” complex, and dissociation of UvrA are regulated by ATP (1). UvrB subsequently recruits the endonuclease UvrC, which catalyzes incisions on either side of the lesion (2, 3). Following incision, UvrC and the damage-containing oligonucleotide are removed by UvrD (helicase II), whereas UvrB remains bound to the gapped DNA and recruits DNA polymerase I for repair synthesis. Sealing of the single-stranded nick completes the repair process and restores the original DNA sequence (4).Since its discovery more than 40 years ago, bacterial nucleotide excision repair has been extensively studied, resulting in a large body of work that describes the protein components and the details of how they operate. Notwithstanding the trove of genetic and biochemical data, several key questions remain unanswered. For example, how does the same set of proteins handle a diverse set of lesions while maintaining specificity? How do UvrA and UvrB cooperate during damage recognition, and what is the precise role of ATP? Ongoing studies in the field, including those described below, aim to address these issues.Recently, we reported the structure of Geobacillus stearothermophilus UvrA and the identification of binding sites for DNA and UvrB (5). We also established that the identified UvrB-binding domain is necessary and sufficient to mediate the UvrA-UvrB interaction and that the isolated interaction domains of UvrA (5) and UvrB (6) bind to each other in solution.To understand the interaction between UvrA and UvrB, we have determined the crystal structure of the complex between the two isolated interaction domains. The structure revealed that UvrA-UvrB interaction interface is largely polar, mediated by several highly conserved charged residues. Site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical characterization of the mutant proteins confirmed the importance of the observed interactions. Based on the interaction domain complex structure, we have constructed a structural model for the full-length UvrA·UvrB ensemble and propose two models for lesion recognition that will serve as a basis for future experiments.     

Small‐angle X‐ray scattering reveals architecture and A2B2 stoichiometry of the UvrA–UvrB DNA damage sensor

The UvrA–UvrB (AB) protein complex operates in the bacterial nucleotide excision repair pathway as the main sensor of DNA damage. Crystallographic analysis of the AB complex revealed a linear UvrB–UvrA–UvrA–UvrB arrangement of subunits with an internal two‐fold axis that became incorporated into the crystal. Here, we have used small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) to show close correspondence between the crystal structure and the entity in solution. This result confirms the number and disposition of subunits in the crystallographic model and rules out other possible arrangements suggested by packing in the crystal. The current SAXS analysis failed to detect significant changes to the structure as a function of nucleotide. Proteins 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The beta -hairpin motif of UvrB is essential for DNA binding, damage processing, and UvrC-mediated incisions.

UvrB plays a major role in recognition and processing of DNA lesions during nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure of UvrB revealed a similar fold as found in monomeric DNA helicases. Homology modeling suggested that the beta-hairpin motif of UvrB might be involved in DNA binding (Theis, K., Chen, P. J., Skorvaga, M., Van Houten, B., and Kisker, C. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6899-6907). To determine a role of the beta-hairpin of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB, we have constructed a deletion mutant, Deltabetah UvrB, which lacks residues Gln-97-Asp-112 of the beta-hairpin. Deltabetah UvrB does not form a stable UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex and is inactive in UvrABC-mediated incision. However, Deltabetah UvrB is able to bind to UvrA and form a complex with UvrA and damaged DNA, competing with wild type UvrB. In addition, Deltabetah UvrB shows wild type-like ATPase activity in complex with UvrA that is stimulated by damaged DNA. In contrast to wild type UvrB, the ATPase activity of mutant UvrB does not lead to a destabilization of the damaged duplex. These results indicate that the conserved beta-hairpin motif is a major factor in DNA binding.     

Interaction of UvrA and UvrB proteins with a fluorescent single-stranded DNA. Implication for slow conformational change upon interaction of UvrB with DNA

UvrA and UvrB proteins play key roles in the damage recognition step in the nucleotide excision repair. However, the molecular mechanism of damage recognition by these proteins is still not well understood. In this work we analyzed the interaction between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) labeled with a fluorophore tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) and Thermus thermophilus HB8 UvrA (ttUvrA) and UvrB (ttUvrB) proteins. TMR-labeled ssDNA (TMR-ssDNA) as well as UV-irradiated ssDNA stimulated ATPase activity of ttUvrB more strongly than did normal ssDNA, indicating that this fluorescent ssDNA was recognized as damaged ssDNA. The addition of ttUvrA or ttUvrB enhanced the fluorescence intensity of TMR-ssDNA, and the intensity was much greater in the presence of ATP. Fluorescence titration indicated that ttUvrA has higher specificity for TMR-ssDNA than for normal ssDNA in the absence of ATP. The ttUvrB showed no specificity for TMR-ssDNA, but it took over 200 min for the fluorescence intensity of the ttUvrB-TMR-ssDNA complex to reach saturation in the presence of ATP. This time-dependent change could be separated into two phases. The first phase was rapid, whereas the second phase was slow and dependent on ATP hydrolysis. Time dependence of ATPase activity and fluorescence polarization suggested that changes other than the binding reaction occurred during the second phase. These results strongly suggest that ttUvrB binds ssDNA quickly and that a conformational change in ttUrvB-ssDNA complex occurs slowly. We also found that DNA containing a fluorophore as a lesion is useful for directly investigating the damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB.