Folate Receptor-α (FOLR1) Expression and Function in Triple Negative Tumors

Folate receptor alpha (FOLR1) has been identified as a potential prognostic and therapeutic target in a number of cancers. A correlation has been shown between intense overexpression of FOLR1 in breast tumors and poor prognosis, yet there is limited examination of the distribution of FOLR1 across clinically relevant breast cancer subtypes. To explore this further, we used RNA-seq data from multiple patient cohorts to analyze the distribution of FOLR1 mRNA across breast cancer subtypes comprised of estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor positive (HER2+), and triple negative (TNBC) tumors. FOLR1 expression varied within breast tumor subtypes; triple negative/basal tumors were significantly associated with increased expression of FOLR1 mRNA, compared to ER+ and HER2+ tumors. However, subsets of high level FOLR1 expressing tumors were observed in all clinical subtypes. These observations were supported by immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays, with the largest number of 3+ positive tumors and highest H-scores of any subtype represented by triple negatives, and lowest by ER+ tumors. FOLR1 expression did not correlate to common clinicopathological parameters such as tumor stage and nodal status. To delineate the importance of FOLR1 overexpression in triple negative cancers, RNA-interference was used to deplete FOLR1 in overexpressing triple negative cell breast lines. Loss of FOLR1 resulted in growth inhibition, whereas FOLR1 overexpression promoted folate uptake and growth advantage in low folate conditions. Taken together, our data suggests patients with triple negative cancers expressing high FOLR1 expression represent an important population of patients that may benefit from targeted anti-FOLR1 therapy. This may prove particularly helpful for a large number of patients who would typically be classified as triple negative and who to this point have been left without any targeted treatment options.     

Estrogen receptor and C19-5-ene-steroid concentrations in the nuclear fraction from human breast carcinoma tissue.

The adrenal-derived estrogen 5-androstene-3 beta,17 beta-diol (ADIOL) is estrogenic at the concentrations found in the blood of Western women. We have now measured the concentrations of both ADIOL and the estrogen receptor (ER) in the nuclear fraction (800 g pellet) of 89 primary human mammary tumors. No difference was found in nuclear ADIOL concentrations in tumors from 45 pre- and 44 postmenopausal women. Significantly higher nuclear ADIOL concentrations were found in 49 ER negative tumors compared to 40 ER positive tumors (P < 0.005). A similar relationship applied in the postmenopausal group (P = 0.01) and the premenopausal group, but in this latter instance failed to reach significance (P = 0.1). In ER positive tumors there was no correlation between ADIOL and ER nuclear levels. ADIOL was present in the total particulate fraction (100,000 g pellet) at twice the concentration found in the nuclear 800 g pellet and again no difference was found in its concentration in tumors from 20 pre- compared to 34 postmenopausal women. Dehydroepiandrosterone was also measured in the 800 g fraction of 45 tumors and its concentration, which was some 10-fold higher than ADIOL and significantly correlated with that steroid, was again independent of menopausal status. The higher concentration of C19-5-ene-steroids in ER negative cellular fractions could be due to differences in their metabolism; ER negative tumors either lack, or possess very low levels of, hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase which catalyzes formation of sulfate esters of C19-5-ene-steroids previously observed to be major metabolites produced by ER positive cells. Higher concentrations of free steroids in ER negative cells would then be available for combination with membranes and non-specific binding sites throughout the cell.     

Expression of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in human breast cancer correlates with estrogen receptor status

The insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) have been implicated in the growth regulation of human breast cancer. Since the IGFs are associated with specific binding proteins (IGFBPs) which may modulate receptor/ligand interactions, production of IGFBPs by breast cancer cells could alter their IGF-dependent growth. This study examined the expression of IGFBPs 4, 5, and 6 in eight breast cancer cell lines (BCCLs) using ribonuclease (RNase) protection assays. IGFBP-4 mRNA was detected in all BCCLs studied. IGFBP-5 expression was higher in estrogen receptor (ER) positive cells, while IGFBP-6 mRNA was detected in only two ER negative BCCLs. We also found that E₂ treatment enhanced the expression of IGFBPs 2, 4, and 5 in T47-D cells. We next studied IGFBP mRNA expression in 40 primary breast tumors. All tumors expressed mRNA for IGFBPs 2–6 but none expressed IGFBP-1 message. IGFBP-3 expression was higher in ER negative tumors, while that of IGFBP-4 and -5 was higher in ER positive specimens. These differences were statistically significant (P < .05). Ligand blot analysis of tumor extracts confirmed the presence of IGFBPs in breast cancer tissues. Thus, differential IGFBP expression in ER positive and negative tumors suggests an important role for this protein in breast cancer biology.     

Estrogen receptor gene amplification is found in some estrogen receptor-positive human breast tumors

The genomic organization of the estrogen receptor (ER) gene has been analyzed in 21 primary human breast cancers and 1 axillary metastasis. No evidence of rearrangements of the ER gene was found in the analyzed tumors. In 6/14 ER-positive tumors a certain degree of amplification of the ER gene, ranging from 1.6 to 3-fold, was detected. No correlation was observed between the level of gene amplification and the amount of ER in the tumors. In the 8 ER-negative tumors analyzed no amplification could be detected. It is concluded that ER gene amplification may be one of the mechanisms underlying the increased ER expression in some breast tumors.     

Promoter Hypermethylation in Tumor Suppressing Genes p16 and FHIT and Their Relationship with Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Patients from Northern India

BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation has been recognized in human breast carcinogenesis as a common molecular alteration associated with the loss of expression of a number of key regulatory genes. The present study was undertaken to determine whether methylation and expression of p16 and FHIT genes would correlate with the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. METHODS: Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, messenger RNA (mRNA) expression analysis, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analysis were performed to study the methylation of p16 and FHIT genes in 351 pairs of malignant/normal breast tissues. We examined the expression of ER and PR in those specimens by immunohistochemistry. Mutations of p16 and FHIT genes in tumors were detected by direct sequencing. RESULTS: The frequency of hypermethylation was 31.9% and 36.8% in p16 and FHIT genes, respectively, and showed significant harmony in concordant hypermethylation (P < .0001). In postmenopausal patients, methylation frequency in both genes is significantly higher in poorly and moderately differentiated tumors. Loss of protein expression of p16 and FHIT in 77 and 74 tumors, respectively, is associated with their methylation status in premenopausal women. CONCLUSION: We did not find any significant differences in tumor-related gene methylation patterns relevant to both ER and PR status of breast tumors.     

Minimising immunohistochemical false negative ER classification using a complementary 23 gene expression signature of ER status

Background

Expression of the oestrogen receptor (ER) in breast cancer predicts benefit from endocrine therapy. Minimising the frequency of false negative ER status classification is essential to identify all patients with ER positive breast cancers who should be offered endocrine therapies in order to improve clinical outcome. In routine oncological practice ER status is determined by semi-quantitative methods such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) or other immunoassays in which the ER expression level is compared to an empirical threshold[1], [2]. The clinical relevance of gene expression-based ER subtypes as compared to IHC-based determination has not been systematically evaluated. Here we attempt to reduce the frequency of false negative ER status classification using two gene expression approaches and compare these methods to IHC based ER status in terms of predictive and prognostic concordance with clinical outcome.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Firstly, ER status was discriminated by fitting the bimodal expression of ESR1 to a mixed Gaussian model. The discriminative power of ESR1 suggested bimodal expression as an efficient way to stratify breast cancer; therefore we identified a set of genes whose expression was both strongly bimodal, mimicking ESR expression status, and highly expressed in breast epithelial cell lines, to derive a 23-gene ER expression signature-based classifier. We assessed our classifiers in seven published breast cancer cohorts by comparing the gene expression-based ER status to IHC-based ER status as a predictor of clinical outcome in both untreated and tamoxifen treated cohorts. In untreated breast cancer cohorts, the 23 gene signature-based ER status provided significantly improved prognostic power compared to IHC-based ER status (P = 0.006). In tamoxifen-treated cohorts, the 23 gene ER expression signature predicted clinical outcome (HR = 2.20, P = 0.00035). These complementary ER signature-based strategies estimated that between 15.1% and 21.8% patients of IHC-based negative ER status would be classified with ER positive breast cancer.

Conclusion/Significance

Expression-based ER status classification may complement IHC to minimise false negative ER status classification and optimise patient stratification for endocrine therapies.     

Loss of circadian clock gene expression is associated with tumor progression in breast cancer

Several studies suggest a link between circadian rhythm disturbances and tumorigenesis. However, the association between circadian clock genes and prognosis in breast cancer has not been systematically studied. Therefore, we examined the expression of 17 clock components in tumors from 766 node-negative breast cancer patients that were untreated in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In addition, their association with metastasis-free survival (MFS) and correlation to clinicopathological parameters were investigated. Aiming to estimate functionality of the clockwork, we studied clock gene expression relationships by correlation analysis. Higher expression of several clock genes (e.g., CLOCK, PER1, PER2, PER3, CRY2, NPAS2 and RORC) was found to be associated with longer MFS in univariate Cox regression analyses (HR<1 and FDR-adjusted P < 0.05). Stratification according to molecular subtype revealed prognostic relevance for PER1, PER3, CRY2 and NFIL3 in the ER+/HER2- subgroup, CLOCK and NPAS2 in the ER-/HER2- subtype, and ARNTL2 in HER2+ breast cancer. In the multivariate Cox model, only PER3 (HR = 0.66; P = 0.016) and RORC (HR = 0.42; P = 0.003) were found to be associated with survival outcome independent of established clinicopathological parameters. Pairwise correlations between functionally-related clock genes (e.g., PER2-PER3 and CRY2-PER3) were stronger in ER+, HER2- and low-grade carcinomas; whereas, weaker correlation coefficients were observed in ER- and HER2+ tumors, high-grade tumors and tumors that progressed to metastatic disease. In conclusion, loss of clock genes is associated with worse prognosis in breast cancer. Coordinated co-expression of clock genes, indicative of a functional circadian clock, is maintained in ER+, HER2-, low grade and non-metastasizing tumors but is compromised in more aggressive carcinomas.     

Fibrin sealant does not decrease seroma output or time to drain removal following inguino-femoral lymph node dissection in melanoma patients: A randomized controlled trial (NCT00506311)

Background

Breast carcinoma is a disease with a tremendous heterogeneity in its clinical behavior. Newer prognostic factors and predictors of response to therapy are needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of HER-2, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) in breast carcinoma and to compare it with other prognostic parameters such as histological type and grade, tumor size, patients' age, and lymph node metastases.

Patients and methods

This is a retrospective study conducted in the department of pathology at Sfax University Hospital. Confirmed 155 Cases of breast carcinoma were reviewed in the period between January 2000 and December 2004. We used immunohistochemistry to evaluate the expression of HER-2, ER, and PR receptor and Chi-square and Fisher exact test to correlate immunohistochemical findings with prognostic parameters for breast carcinoma such as patients' age, tumor size, histological type, histological grade and lymph node status.

Results

The mean age of patients was 51.5 years, ranging from 22 to 89 years. 80 (51.6%) of the patients were below 50 years. The percentage of expression of HER-2, ER and PR was 26, 59.4, and 52.3%, respectively. HER-2 was over-expressed (3+) in 18.1% of the cases, was inversely related to ER expression (p = 0.00) and to PR expression (p = 0.048). This over-expression was also associated with a high tumor grade with marginal significance (p = 0.072). A negative correlation was noted between ER and PR expression and SBR grade (p = 0.000) and ER and age (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

HER-2 over-expression was observed in 18.1% of Tunisian breast carcinoma affecting female patients. This group presents apparently an aggressive form of breast carcinoma with high histological grade and negative ER.     

Estrogen receptor alpha negative breast cancer patients: estrogen receptor beta as a therapeutic target

Clinical management of breast cancer is increasingly guided by assessment of tumor phenotypic parameters. One of these is estrogen receptor (ER) status, currently defined by ERalpha expression. However with the discovery of a second ER, ERbeta and its variant isoforms, the definition of ER status is potentially more complex. In breast tumors there are two ERbeta expression cohorts. One where ERbeta is co-expressed with ERalpha and the other expressing ERbeta alone. In the latter subgroup of currently defined ER negative patients ERbeta has the potential to be a therapeutic target. Characterization of the nature and role of ERbeta in ERalpha negative tumors is essentially unexplored but available data suggest that the role of ERbeta may be different when co-expressed with ERalpha and when expressed alone. This review summarizes available data and explores the possibility that ERbeta signaling may be a therapeutic target in these tumors. Evidence so far supports the idea that the role of ERbeta in breast cancer is different in ERalpha negative compared to ERalpha positive tumors. However, cohort size and numbers of independent studies are small to date, and more studies are needed with better standardization of antibodies and protocols. Also, the ability to determine the role of ERbeta in ERalpha negative breast cancer and therefore assess ERbeta signaling pathways as therapeutic targets would be greatly facilitated by identification of specific downstream markers of ERbeta activity in breast cancer.     

Epidermal growth factor receptors in human breast and endometrial carcinomas

The incidence and levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were studied in 67 breast tumors and 22 endometrial carcinomas. Estrogen receptors (ER) were also measured in all samples and progesterone receptors (PR) were analyzed in 57 breast samples and 21 endometrial tumors. A high level of EGFR expression is found in both breast and endometrial carcinomas, although the incidence of EGFR content is greater in breast carcinomas. 36% of breast tumors had EGFR at levels 3-49.5 fmol/mg membrane protein, whereas this percentage of positivity was 27% for endometrial tumors. In 51% of breast carcinoma and 73% of endometrial tumors, there was a positive ER content, whereas 53% of breast tumors and 62% of endometrial carcinomas were positive. A clear inverse relationship between EGFR content and ER and PR status has been observed in breast tumors. Our data confirm the previously described inverse correlation between expression of EGFR and estrogen receptors in human breast cancer. We also show here that there is a similar inverse relationship between EGFR content and ER levels in endometrial tumors.     

Dormancy signatures and metastasis in estrogen receptor positive and negative breast cancer

Breast cancers can recur after removal of the primary tumor and treatment to eliminate remaining tumor cells. Recurrence may occur after long periods of time during which there are no clinical symptoms. Tumor cell dormancy may explain these prolonged periods of asymptomatic residual disease and treatment resistance. We generated a dormancy gene signature from published experimental models and applied it to both breast cancer cell line expression data as well as four published clinical studies of primary breast cancers. We found that estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cell lines and primary tumors have significantly higher dormancy signature scores (P<0.0000001) than ER- cell lines and tumors. In addition, a stratified analysis combining all ER+ tumors in four studies indicated 2.1 times higher hazard of recurrence among patients whose tumors had low dormancy scores (LDS) compared to those whose tumors had high dormancy scores (HDS) (p<0.000005). The trend was shown in all four individual studies. Suppression of two dormancy genes, BHLHE41 and NR2F1, resulted in increased in vivo growth of ER positive MCF7 cells. The patient data analysis suggests that disseminated ER positive tumor cells carrying a dormancy signature are more likely to undergo prolonged dormancy before resuming metastatic growth. Furthermore, genes identified with this approach might provide insight into the mechanisms of dormancy onset and maintenance as well as dormancy models using human breast cancer cell lines.     

Synthesis and evaluation of aryl-substituted diarylpropionitriles,selective ligands for estrogen receptor β, as positron-emission tomographic imaging agents

We have investigated halogen-substituted non-steroidal estrogens with selective binding affinity for the estrogen receptor β (ERβ that might be used for imaging the levels of this ER-subtype in breast tumors by positron emission tomography (PET). Based on diarylpropionitrile (DPN, 1a), a compound previously reported that has a 72-fold binding selectivity for ERβ, we developed a series of DPN analogs having methyl-, hydroxyl-, and halogen substituents, including fluoroethyl and fluoropropyl groups. In competitive radiometric binding assays with [³H]estradiol, all of these DPN analogs showed high ERβ/ERα selectivity; while the selectivity varied, in some cases it reached nearly 300-fold (RBA: ERα, 0.023%; ERβ, 6.25%). The absolute ERβ binding affinities, however, were not sufficient to merit further consideration for developing these ligands as PET imaging agents.     

EGFR overexpression relates to triple negative profile and poor prognosis in breast cancer patients in Tunisia

Background: The prognosis of breast carcinoma is related to a large variety of clinical and pathological factors. Currently, only oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are used in routine pathological assessment as biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression individually and in combination to classical biomarkers (HER2, ER, and PR), and its relation to tumors with triple negative profile in Tunisian breast carcinoma.

Methods: Immunohistochemistry was used to estimate the rate expression of these receptors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the prognostic significance of EGFR in this study.

Results: The expression rate of EGFR was 28.6%. EGFR expression was inversely correlated to that of ER (P < 0.001). Significant correlations between the expression of EGFR and the high histological Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade (P = 0.038) and also with tumors size (P = 0.041) were observed. The triple negative profile (TN: ER?/PR?/HER2?) was present in 17.3% of cases. EGFR overexpression was positively associated with this clinical aggressive profile (P < 0.001). Survival analysis showed that EGFR expression was associated with poor survival of patients (P = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, EGFR expression (P = 0.035) was found to be independent prognostic factors (significantly correlated to survival).

Conclusion: EGFR overexpression was observed in 28.6% of Tunisian breast carcinoma, associated with unfavorable prognosis and with triple negative tumors. Systemically evaluation of EGFR in breast carcinoma could benefit especially to TN subgroup from EGFR targeting agents.     

Receptors for epidermal growth factor in breast cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) and cytosolic (cER) and nuclear (nER) estradiol receptors were quantified in 220 primary breast cancers. The EGFr was significantly more frequent (X2 = 5.9; P less than 0.025) and its concentration was significantly higher (P less than 0.001) among ER- tumors than in ER+ tumors. There was a significantly greater proportion (X2 = 6.4; P less than 0.05) of node involvement in EGFr+/ER+ tumors than in EFGr/ER+. Increases in the proportion of EGFr+ in ER- tumors are parallel to Scarff-Bloom scores (X2 = 6.1; P less than 0.05) and there is a significant trend towards increased EGFr concentrations with histologic dedifferentiation. In ER+ tumors the median concentrations of EGFr in the different age groups show linear correlation and follow a parallel profile with the medians of nER. These findings support the hypothesis that considers EGFr as a bad prognosis factor and suggest that EGFr expression and concentration in ER+ tumors might be considered an estrogenic action mediated through the binding of ER to their nuclear acceptors.