Centromeric chromatin pliability and memory at a human neocentromere

We show that Trichostatin A (TSA)-induced partial histone hyperacetylation causes a unidirectional shift in the position of a previously defined binding domain for the centromere-specific histone H3 homologue CENP-A at a human neocentromere. The shift of approximately 320 kb is fully reversible when TSA is removed, but is accompanied by an apparent reduction in the density of CENP-A per unit length of genomic DNA at the neocentromere. TSA treatment also instigates a reversible abolition of a previously defined major domain of differentially delayed replication timing that was originally established at the neocentromeric site. None of these changes has any measurable deleterious effects on mitosis or neocentromere function. The data suggest pliability of centromeric chromatin in response to epigenetic triggers, and the non-essential nature of the regions of delayed replication for centromere function. Reversibility of the CENP-A-binding position and the predominant region of delayed replication timing following removal of TSA suggest strong memory at the original site of neocentromeric chromatin formation.     

Formation of novel CENP-A domains on tandem repetitive DNA and across chromosome breakpoints on human chromosome 8q21 neocentromeres

Endogenous human centromeres form on megabase-sized arrays of tandemly repeated alpha satellite DNA. Human neocentromeres form epigenetically at ectopic sites devoid of alpha satellite DNA and permit analysis of centromeric DNA and chromatin organization. In this study, we present molecular cytogenetic and CENP-A chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on CHIP analyses of two neocentromeres that have formed in chromosome band 8q21 each with a unique DNA and CENP-A chromatin configuration. The first neocentromere was found on a neodicentric chromosome 8 with an inactivated endogenous centromere, where the centromeric activity and CENP-A domain were repositioned to band 8q21 on a large tandemly repeated DNA. This is the first example of a neocentromere forming on repetitive DNA, as all other mapped neocentromeres have formed on single copy DNA. Quantitative fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis showed a 60% reduction in the alpha satellite array size at the inactive centromere compared to the active centromere on the normal chromosome 8. This neodicentric chromosome may provide insight into centromere inactivation and the role of tandem DNA in centromere structure. The second neocentromere was found on a neocentric ring chromosome that contained the 8q21 tandemly repeated DNA, although the neocentromere was localized to a different genomic region. Interestingly, this neocentromere is composed of two distinct CENP-A domains in bands 8q21 and 8q24, which are brought into closer proximity on the ring chromosome. This neocentromere suggests that chromosomal rearrangement and DNA breakage may be involved in neocentromere formation. These novel examples provide insight into the formation and structure of human neocentromeres.     

A neocentromere in the DAZ region of the human Y chromosome

We describe a novel rearranged human Y chromosome consisting of an inverted duplication of the long arm heterochromatin and a small amount of euchromatin: rea(Y)(qter-q11.2::q11.2-qter). The normal centromere has been deleted and a neocentromere containing CENP-A, -C, -E and Mad2 but not CENP-B has formed close to the breakpoint. A 2.7 Mb yeast artificial chromosome contig spanning the breakpoint was constructed and the breakpoint was localised to a region of <120 kb close to the DAZ gene cluster. Combined immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridisation showed that the centromeric protein-binding domain of the neocentromere was located near the breakpoint and within the DAZ cluster.     

An enzyme with self-control

The nearly ubiquitous presence of repetitive centromere DNA sequences across eukaryotic species is in paradoxical contrast to their apparent functional dispensability. Centromeric chromatin is spatially delineated into the kinetochore-forming array of centromere protein A (CENP-A)–containing nucleosomes and the inner centromeric heterochromatin that lacks CENP-A but recruits the aurora B kinase that is necessary for correcting erroneous attachments to the mitotic spindle. We found that the self-perpetuating network of CENPs at the foundation of the kinetochore is intact at a human neocentromere lacking repetitive α-satellite DNA. However, aurora B is inappropriately silenced as a consequence of the altered geometry of the neocentromere, thereby compromising the error correction mechanism. This suggests a model wherein the neocentromere represents a primordial inheritance locus that requires subsequent generation of a robust inner centromere compartment to enhance fidelity of chromosome transmission.     

Evolutionary and clinical neocentromeres: two faces of the same coin?

It has been hypothesized that human clinical neocentromeres and evolutionary novel centromeres (ENC) represent two faces of the same phenomenon. However, there are only two reports of loci harboring both a novel centromere and a clinical neocentromere. We suggest that only the tip of the iceberg has been scratched because most neocentromerization events have a very low chance of being observed. In support of this view, we report here on a neocentromere at 9q33.1 that emerged in a ring chromosome of about 12 Mb. The ring was produced by a balanced rearrangement that was fortuitously discovered because of its malsegregation in the propositus. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation-on-chip experiments using anti-centromere protein (CENP)-A and anti-CENP-C antibodies strongly indicated that a novel centromeric domain was present in the ring, in a chromosomal domain where an ENC emerged in the ancestor to Old World monkeys.     

Three-dimensional localization of CENP-A suggests a complex higher order structure of centromeric chromatin

The histone H3 variant centromere protein A (CENP-A) is central to centromere formation throughout eukaryotes. A long-standing question in centromere biology has been the organization of CENP-A at the centromere and its implications for the structure of centromeric chromatin. In this study, we describe the three-dimensional localization of CENP-A at the inner kinetochore plate through serial-section transmission electron microscopy of human mitotic chromosomes. At the kinetochores of normal centromeres and at a neocentromere, CENP-A occupies a compact domain at the inner kinetochore plate, stretching across two thirds of the length of the constriction but encompassing only one third of the constriction width and height. Within this domain, evidence of substructure is apparent. Combined with previous chromatin immunoprecipitation results (Saffery, R., H. Sumer, S. Hassan, L.H. Wong, J.M. Craig, K. Todokoro, M. Anderson, A. Stafford, and K.H.A. Choo. 2003. Mol. Cell. 12:509–516; Chueh, A.C., L.H. Wong, N. Wong, and K.H.A. Choo. 2005. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:85–93), our data suggest that centromeric chromatin is arranged in a coiled 30-nm fiber that is itself coiled or folded to form a higher order structure.     

Role of nuclear matrix proteins in the formation of heterochromatin]

Heterochromatin consists mainly of satellite DNAs (stDNA), the most rapidly evolving type of DNA sequences of the eucaryotic genome. On the other hand, stDNA is involved in the formation of the functionally conserved centromere structure. Centromeres and pericentromeric stDNA, are known to be in association with nuclear matrix or chromosome scaffold at all stages of the cell cycle. Several lines of evidence show that attachment of stDNA to the nuclear matrix is specific. The first defined parts of the genes found in association with nuclear matrix/scaffold, MAR/SAR, possess some common features with the stDNA. A number of different mechanisms have previously been implicated in heterochromatin formation and centromere conservation. The role of nuclear matrix proteins, which are able to recognize common structural features of MAR/SAR and stDNA, in constitutive heterochromatin organization is discussed in the current review.     

Genome characterization and CRISPR-Cas9 editing of a human neocentromere

The maintenance of genome integrity is ensured by proper chromosome inheritance during mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. The chromosomal counterpart responsible for chromosome segregation to daughter cells is the centromere, at which the spindle apparatus attaches through the kinetochore. Although all mammalian centromeres are primarily composed of megabase-long repetitive sequences, satellite-free human neocentromeres have been described. Neocentromeres and evolutionary new centromeres have revolutionized traditional knowledge about centromeres. Over the past 20 years, insights have been gained into their organization, but in spite of these advancements, the mechanisms underlying their formation and evolution are still unclear. Today, through modern and increasingly accessible genome editing and long-read sequencing techniques, research in this area is undergoing a sudden acceleration. In this article, we describe the primary sequence of a previously described human chromosome 3 neocentromere and observe its possible evolution and repair results after a chromosome breakage induced through CRISPR-Cas9 technologies. Our data represent an exciting advancement in the field of centromere/neocentromere evolution and chromosome stability.

     

A neocentromere on human chromosome 3 without detectable α-satellite DNA forms morphologically normal kinetochores

A neocentromere at 3q26 was observed in a father and his daughter on a chromosome 3 with deleted centromeric region. No α-satellite DNA was detectable at the 3q26 neocentromere, but it was weakly positive with anticentromere (CREST) antibodies. Electron microscopy showed that the neocentromere formed microtubule-associated kinetochores with normal morphology and of the same size as the kinetochores of other large chromosomes. The deleted centromere formed a small linear marker chromosome that reacted strongly with anticentromere antibodies, but showed reduced kinetochore size. The 3q26 neokinetochore was stable under adverse growth conditions, which often caused kinetochore loss in the original 3-centromere on the small marker. Received : 21 April 1998 / Accepted: 15 August 1998     

核骨架基质结合区(S/MAR)提高逆转录病毒载体介导egfp在NIH3T3细胞中的表达

为减轻逆转录病毒介导的外源基因的沉默 ,进一步提高逆转录病毒MFG载体介导的转移基因的表达 ,将人 β INF基因上游 80 0bp的核骨架基质结合区 (S MAR)分别反向和正向克隆至MFG载体 3′LTR上游 ,以egfp为报告基因观察S MAR对egfp基因表达水平以及对病毒滴度的影响 .结果显示 :反向和正向的S MAR在瞬时表达的情况都不能提高egfp的表达 ,但在稳定整合的情况下反向S MAR可明显提高egfp在NIH3T3细胞内的表达 ,而正向的S MAR作用不明显 ,另外反向S MAR可明显提高MFG逆转录病毒载体的滴度约 5倍 ;因此改造后的MFG逆转录病毒载体将能更好地用来介导外源治疗基因的表达 .同时还观察到 ,同一个载体骨架在稳定表达的情况下 ,磷酸钙介导较逆转录病毒载体介导的表达水平高 .提示逆转录病毒的生活史可能参与其介导的外源基因的沉默     

An episomally replicating vector binds to the nuclear matrix protein SAF-A in vivo

pEPI-1, a vector in which a chromosomal scaffold/matrix-attached region (S/MAR) is linked to the simian virus 40 origin of replication, is propagated episomally in CHO cells in the absence of the virally encoded large T-antigen and is stably maintained in the absence of selection pressure. It has been suggested that mitotic stability is provided by a specific interaction of this vector with components of the nuclear matrix. We studied the interactions of pEPI-1 by crosslinking with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II, after which it is found to copurify with the nuclear matrix. In a south-western analysis, the vector shows exclusive binding to hnRNP-U/SAF-A, a multifunctional scaffold/matrix specific factor. Immunoprecipitation of the crosslinked DNA-protein complex demonstrates that pEPI-1 is bound to this protein in vivo. These data provide the first experimental evidence for the binding of an artificial episome to a nuclear matrix protein in vivo and the basis for understanding the mitotic stability of this novel vector class.     

Activation of rye 5RL neocentromere by an organophosphate pesticide

An interstitial constriction located on the long arm of rye chromosome 5R (5RL) shows neocentromeric activity at meiosis. In some meiocytes this region is strongly stretched orienting with the true centromere to opposite poles at metaphase I, and keeping sister chromatid cohesion at anaphase I. We found previously that the frequency of neocentric activity varied dramatically in different generations suggesting the effect of environmental factors. Here we studied the behavior of the 5RL neocentromere in mono- and ditelosomic 5RL, and mono-, and disomic 5R wheat-rye addition lines, untreated and treated with an organophosphate pesticide. The treated plants form neocentromeres with an about 4.5-fold increased frequency compared to untreated ones, demonstrating that the pesticide promotes neocentric activity. The neocentromere was activated irrespectively of the pairing configuration or the presence of a complete or truncated 5R centromere. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with 2 repetitive sequences (UCM600 and pSc119.2) present at the constriction showed kinetic activity at several locations within this region. Immunostaining with anti-α-tubulin showed that treated plants have abnormal spindles in 46% of the metaphase I cells, indicating that disturbances in spindle formation might promote neocentromere activation.     

Chromosome 6 phylogeny in primates and centromere repositioning

A panel of 15 human BAC/PAC probes, covering the entire chromosome 6, was used in FISH experiments on great apes and on representatives of Old World monkeys, New World monkeys, and lemurs to delineate the chromosome 6 phylogeny in primates. The domestic cat was used as an outgroup. The analysis showed a high marker order conservation, with few rearrangements required to reconcile the hypothesized chromosome 6 organization in primate ancestor with marker arrangement in all the examined species. Contrary to this simple evolutionary scenario, however, the centromere was found to be located in three distinct regions, without any evidence of chromosomal rearrangement that would account for its movement. One of the two centromere repositioning events occurred in great apes ancestor. The centromere moved from 6p22.1 to the present day location after the inversion event that differentiated marker order of the primate ancestor from the ancestor of Catarrhini. A cluster of intrachromosomal segmental duplications was found at 6p22.1, scattered in a region of about 9 Mb, which we interpret as remains of duplicons that flanked the ancestral centromere. Our data, therefore, suggest that some duplicon clusters found in noncentromeric/nontelomeric locations may represent traces of evolutionary silenced centromeres that inactivated after the occurrence of a centromere repositioning. In addition, the neocentromere emergence we have documented in Old World monkeys at 6q24.3 appears to have arisen and progressed without affecting the displaced flanking sequences.