RAP-1 factor is necessary for DNA loop formation in vitro at the silent mating type locus HML

DNA fragments containing the silencers that flank the mating type genes at HML alpha are shown to bind specifically to the nuclear scaffold of yeast. The scaffold proteins are solubilized with urea and then renatured to form a soluble extract which allows reconstitution of sequence-specific DNA loops. At the silent mating type locus HML alpha, loops are formed by either silencer-silencer (E-I) interaction or silencer-promoter interactions (E-P and I-P). The nuclear protein RAP-1 fractionates efficiently with the nuclear scaffold, and binds to the E, I, and promoter regions. Affinity purification of RAP-1 and oligonucleotide competition show that RAP-1 is necessary for reconstitution of loops in vitro. These results are consistent with a model in which silencers define a chromatin loop within which occur modifications that maintain the promoter in an inactive state.     

Identification of a non-basic domain in the histone H4 N-terminus required for repression of the yeast silent mating loci.

We have shown previously that a stretch of four charged residues (16-19) at the histone H4 N-terminus is involved in repression of the yeast silent mating loci. One of these residues, Lys16, is a site for acetylation, which may prevent repression of the silent mating loci. In this paper we ask whether other sequences in histone H4, possibly in conjunction with H3 residues, are required for repression. We find that even in combination, the other seven acetylatable lysines in H3 and H4 do not function in repression. In contrast, we have found that an adjacent relatively uncharged domain (residues 21-29) is required for repression and that single amino acid insertions and deletions in this region are extremely detrimental. We propose that the basic and non-basic domains together form a DNA (or protein) induced amphipathic alpha-helix required in the formation of a repressive chromatin structure.     

Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast

Yeast histone H4 function was probed in vivo by deleting segments of this extremely conserved 102 amino acid protein. Deletions in the hydrophobic core of H4 are lethal and block chromosomal segregation. In contrast, deletions at the hydrophilic N terminus (residues 4-28) and C terminus (residues 100-102) are viable. However, N-terminal deletion alters normal chromatin structure and lengthens the cell cycle, especially G2. Surprisingly, removal of the H4 N terminus also derepresses the silent mating type loci, HML alpha and HMRa, disrupting mating. This activation is specific since other regulated genes (GAL10, PHO5, CUP1) are repressed and induced normally in these cells. Deletions of the hydrophilic N termini of H2A or H2B do not show this effect on mating. These experiments allow us to define a unique H4 function that is not shared by other histones (H2A and H2B).     

Specific repression of the yeast silent mating locus HMR by an adjacent telomere.

The yeast silent mating loci HML and HMR are located at opposite ends of chromosome III adjacent to the telomeres. Mutations in the N terminus of histone H4 have been previously found to derepress the yeast silent mating locus HML to a much greater extent than HMR. Although differences in the a and alpha mating-type regulatory genes and in the cis-acting silencer elements do not appear to strongly influence the level of derepression at HMR, we have found that the differential between the two silent cassettes is largely due to the position of the HMR cassette relative to the telomere on chromosome III. While HML is derepressed to roughly the same extent by mutations in histone H4 regardless of its chromosomal location, HMR is affected to different extends depending upon its chromosomal positioning. We have found that HMR is more severely derepressed by histone H4 mutations when positioned far from the telomere (cdc14 locus on chromosome VI) but is only minimally affected by the same mutations when integrated immediately adjacent to another telomere (ADH4 locus on chromosome VII). These data indicate that the degree of silencing at HMR is regulated in part by its neighboring telomere over a distance of at least 23 kb and that this form of regulation is unique for HMR and not present at HML. These data also indicate that histone H4 plays an important role in regulating the silenced state at both HML and HMR.     

Rearrangements at the mating type locus in fission yeast

Summary Crosses involving the partially defective mating type mutant B102 (functional in conjugation, defective in meiosis) have confirmed the notion that, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, certain mating type mutations can arise by transposition. A copy of the mat2 ^P segment (specifying + mating type) is transposed and inserted into the mat1 ^M segment (usually specifying mating type). The mat1 ^M segment affected by the insertion loses its former function entirely. The function is, however, fully regained upon excision of the transposed and inserted mat2 ^P segment.At either position, the mat2 ^P segments can undergo inactivations to different states of residual activity. These events can occur about as frequent as other mutations of the mating type locus (ca. 10^–4 per cell division). In certain diploid strains, such inactivations were significantly correlated with recombination. Spontaneous reversions to full activity were also observed.     

Design of a minimal silencer for the silent mating-type locus HML of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The silent mating-type loci HML and HMR of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contain mating-type information that is permanently repressed. This silencing is mediated by flanking sequence elements, the E- and I-silencers. They contain combinations of binding sites for the proteins Rap1, Abf1 and Sum1 as well as for the origin recognition complex (ORC). Together, they recruit other silencing factors, foremost the repressive Sir2/Sir3/Sir4 complex, to establish heterochromatin-like structures at the HM loci. However, the HM silencers exhibit considerable functional redundancy, which has hampered the identification of further silencing factors. In this study, we constructed a synthetic HML-E silencer (HML-SS ΔI) that lacked this redundancy. It consisted solely of Rap1 and ORC-binding sites and the D2 element, a Sum1-binding site. All three elements were crucial for minimal HML silencing, and mutations in these elements led to a loss of Sir3 recruitment. The silencer was sensitive to a mutation in RAP1, rap1-12, but less sensitive to orc mutations or sum1Δ. Moreover, deletions of SIR1 and DOT1 lead to complete derepression of the HML-SS ΔI silencer. This fully functional, minimal HML-E silencer will therefore be useful to identify novel factors involved in HML silencing.     

Control of yeast cell type by the mating type locus: I. Identification and control of expression of the a-specific gene BAR1

The MATα allele of the yeast mating type locus confers the α mating phenotype and contains two complementation groups, MATα1 and MATα2. The α1–α2 hypothesis proposes that MATα1 is a positive regulator of α-specific genes and that MATα2 is a negative regulator of a-specific genes. According to this hypothesis, matα2 mutants, which are defective in mating and in production of extracellular α-factor, express both a-specific functions (because they lack MATα2 product) and α-specific functions (because they contain MATα1 product). Failure to produce extracellular α-factor results from antagonism between these functions; in particular, because α-factor (an α-specific function) is degraded by an a-specific function. If this view is correct, matα2 mutants should acquire the ability to produce α-factor if they also carry a defect in the gene(s) responsible for α-factor degradation. We have isolated a derivative of a matα2 mutant that produces α-factor and have characterized the suppressor mutation in this strain. (1) This strain carries a mutation (bar1-1) tightly linked to HIS6 (on chromosome IX) that allows matα2 mutants to produce α-factor. (2) It does not allow matα1 mutants to produce α-factor. (3) Haploids of the a mating type bearing the bar1-1 mutation still mate, but are unable to act as a barrier to the diffusion of α-factor. MATa bar1-1 cells display increased sensitivity to α-factor. (4) A mutation (sst1?2) that causes increased sensitivity to α-factor is allelic to bar1-1 and also allows α-factor synthesis by matα2 mutants. The ability of matα2 bar1 double mutants to produce extracellular α-factor indicates that matα2 mutants do produce α-factor but that it is degraded by the Barrier function. These results suggest that BAR1 is normally expressed only in a cells, and is negatively regulated in α cells by the MATα2 product.     

Centromere silencing and function in fission yeast is governed by the amino terminus of histone H3

BACKGROUND: Centromeric domains often consist of repetitive elements that are assembled in specialized chromatin, characterized by hypoacetylation of histones H3 and H4 and methylation of lysine 9 of histone H3 (K9-MeH3). Perturbation of this underacetylated state by transient treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors leads to defective centromere function, correlating with delocalization of the heterochromatin protein Swi6/HP1. Likewise, deletion of the K9-MeH3 methyltransferase Clr4/Suvar39 causes defective chromosome segregation. Here, we create fission yeast strains retaining one histone H3 and H4 gene; the creation of these strains allows mutation of specific N-terminal tail residues and their role in centromeric silencing and chromosome stability to be investigated. RESULTS: Reduction of H3/H4 gene dosage to one-third does not affect cell viability or heterochromatin formation. Mutation of lysines 9 or 14 or serine 10 within the amino terminus of histone H3 impairs centromere function, leading to defective chromosome segregation and Swi6 delocalization. Surprisingly, silent centromeric chromatin does not require the conserved lysine 8 and 16 residues of histone H4. CONCLUSIONS: To date, mutation of conserved N-terminal residues in endogenous histone genes has only been performed in budding yeast, which lacks the Clr4/Suvar39 histone methyltransferase and Swi6/HP1. We demonstrate the importance of conserved residues within the histone H3 N terminus for the maintenance of centromeric heterochromatin in fission yeast. In sharp contrast, mutation of two conserved lysines within the histone H4 tail has no impact on the integrity of centromeric heterochromatin. Our data highlight the striking divergence between the histone tail requirements for the fission yeast and budding yeast silencing pathways.     

Novel mating type-dependent transcripts at the mating type locus in Magnaporthe oryzae

The mating type locus (MAT1) of Magnaporthe oryzae has similar structural organization to MAT in other ascomycetes and encodes the mating type genes MAT1-1-1 with an alpha-box motif and MAT1-2-1 with an HMG-box motif in the MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 idiomorphs, respectively. Sequence and expression analyses of the MAT1 locus indicated a second open reading frame (ORF), MAT1-1-2, in the MAT1-1 idiomorph, and novel mating-type dependent ORFs (MAT1-1-3 and MAT1-2-2) at the locus. The MAT1-1-3 ORF initiated within the MAT1-1 idiomorph while the MAT1-2-2 ORF initiated at the border of the MAT1-2 idiomorph with both ORFs sharing most of their reading frames in the MAT1 flanking region. This suggests that the encoded proteins (MAT1-1-3 and MAT1-2-2) should be similar in their primary structures but can be distinguished by distinct N-termini with amino acids of 1 and 32, respectively, in each mating type. A CT dinucleotide repeat, (CT)n, present in the upstream region of MAT1-1-3, was polymorphic among the isolates.