Bidirectional silencing and DNA methylation-sensitive methylation-spreading properties of the Kcnq1 imprinting control region map to the same regions

The mechanisms underlying the phenomenon of genomic imprinting are poorly understood. Accumulating evidence suggests that imprinting control regions (ICR) associated with the imprinted genes play an important role in creation of imprinted expression domains by propagating parent-of-origin-specific epigenetic modifications. We have recently documented that the Kcnq1 ICR unidirectionally blocks enhancer-promoter communications in a methylation-dependent manner in Hep-3B and Jurkat cell lines. In this report we show that the Kcnq1 ICR harbors bidirectional silencing and methylation-sensitive methylation-spreading properties in a lineage-specific manner. We fine map both of these functions to two critical regions, and loss of one these regions results in loss of silencing as well as methylation spreading. The cell type-specific functions of the Kcnq1 ICR suggest binding of cell type-specific factors to various cis elements within the ICR. Fine mapping of the silencing and methylation-spreading functions to the same regions explains the fact that the silencing factors associated with this region primarily repress the neighboring genes and that methylation occurs as a consequence of silencing.     

A differentially methylated imprinting control region within the Kcnq1 locus harbors a methylation-sensitive chromatin insulator

The mechanisms underlying the phenomenon of genomic imprinting remain poorly understood. In one instance, a differentially methylated imprinting control region (ICR) at the H19 locus has been shown to involve a methylation-sensitive chromatin insulator function that apparently partitions the neighboring Igf2 and H19 genes in different expression domains in a parent of origin-dependent manner. It is not known, however, if this mechanism is unique to the Igf2/H19 locus or if insulator function is a common feature in the regulation of imprinted genes. To address this question, we have studied an ICR in the Kcnq1 locus that regulates long range repression on the paternally derived p57Kip2 and Kcnq1 alleles in an imprinting domain that includes Igf2 and H19. We show that this ICR appears to possess a unidirectional chromatin insulator function in somatic cells of both mesodermal and endodermal origins. Moreover, we document that CpG methylation regulates this insulator function suggesting that a methylation-sensitive chromatin insulator is a common theme in the phenomenon of genomic imprinting.     

Antisense noncoding RNA promoter regulates the timing of de novo methylation of an imprinting control region

Epigenetic marks at cis acting imprinting control regions (ICRs) regulate parent of origin-specific expression of multiple genes in imprinted gene clusters. Epigenetic marks are acquired during gametogenesis and maintained faithfully thereafter. However, the mechanism by which differential epigenetic marks are established and maintained at ICRs is currently unclear. By using Kcnq1 ICR as a model system, we have investigated the functional role of genetic signatures in the acquisition and maintenance of epigenetic marks. Kcnq1 ICR is methylated on the maternal chromosome but remains unmethylated on the paternal chromosome. Here, we show that a paternal allele of Kcnq1 ICR lacking the Kcnq1ot1 promoter remains unmethylated during spermatogenesis; however, it becomes methylated specifically during pre-implantation development. Analysis of the chromatin structure at the paternal ICR in spermatogenic cells and in E13.5 embryonic tissues revealed that the ICRs of both wild type and mutant mice are enriched with H3K4me2 in spermatiogenic cells of the testicular compartment, but the mutant ICR lost H3K4me2 specifically in epididymal sperm and an increase in repressive marks was observed in embryonic tissues. Interestingly, we also detected a decrease in nucleosomal histone levels at the mutant ICR in comparison to the wild-type ICR in epididymal sperm. Taken together, these observations suggest that the Kcnq1ot1 promoter plays a critical role in establishing an epigenetic memory in the male germline by ensuring that the paternal allele remains in an unmethylated state during pre-implantation development.     

Differential regulation of imprinting in the murine embryo and placenta by the Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting control region

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism controlling parental-origin-specific gene expression. Perturbing the parental origin of the distal portion of mouse chromosome 12 causes alterations in the dosage of imprinted genes resulting in embryonic lethality and developmental abnormalities of both embryo and placenta. A 1 Mb imprinted domain identified on distal chromosome 12 contains three paternally expressed protein-coding genes and multiple non-coding RNA genes, including snoRNAs and microRNAs, expressed from the maternally inherited chromosome. An intergenic, parental-origin-specific differentially methylated region, the IG-DMR, which is unmethylated on the maternally inherited chromosome, is necessary for the repression of the paternally expressed protein-coding genes and for activation of the maternally expressed non-coding RNAs: its absence causes the maternal chromosome to behave like the paternally inherited one. Here, we characterise the developmental consequences of this epigenotype switch and compare these with phenotypes associated with paternal uniparental disomy of mouse chromosome 12. The results show that the embryonic defects described for uniparental disomy embryos can be attributed to this one cluster of imprinted genes on distal chromosome 12 and that these defects alone, and not the mutant placenta, can cause prenatal lethality. In the placenta, the absence of the IG-DMR has no phenotypic consequence. Loss of repression of the protein-coding genes occurs but the non-coding RNAs are not repressed on the maternally inherited chromosome. This indicates that the mechanism of action of the IG-DMR is different in the embryo and the placenta and suggests that the epigenetic control of imprinting differs in these two lineages.     

An 11p15 imprinting centre region 2 deletion in a family with Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome provides insights into imprinting control at CDKN1C

We report a three generation family with Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) in whom we have identified a 330 kb deletion within the KCNQ1 locus, encompassing the 11p15.5 Imprinting Centre II (IC2). The deletion arose on the paternal chromosome in the first generation and was only associated with BWS when transmitted maternally to subsequent generations. The deletion on the maternal chromosome was associated with a lower median level of CDKN1C expression in the peripheral blood of affected individuals when compared to a cohort of unaffected controls (p<0.05), however was not significantly different to the expression levels in BWS cases with loss of methylation (LOM) within IC2 (p<0.78). Moreover the individual with a deletion on the paternal chromosome did not show evidence of elevated CDKN1C expression or features of Russell Silver syndrome. These observations support a model invoking the deletion of enhancer elements required for CDKN1C expression lying within or close to the imprinting centre and importantly extend and validate a single observation from an earlier study. Analysis of 94 cases with IC2 loss of methylation revealed that KCNQ1 deletion is a rare cause of loss of maternal methylation, occurring in only 3% of cases, or in 1.5% of BWS overall.