The C-terminus of the G protein α subunit controls the affinity of nucleotides

The C-terminus of the G protein α subunit has a well-known role in determining the selective coupling with the cognate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). In fact, rhodopsin, a prototypical GPCR, exhibits active state [metarhodopsin II (MII)] stabilization by interacting with G protein [extra formation of MII (eMII)], and the extent of stabilization is affected by the C-terminal sequence of Gα. Here we examine the relationship between the amount of eMII and the activation efficiency of Gi mutants whose Giα forms have different lengths of the C-terminal sequence of Goα. The results show that both the activation efficiencies of Gi and the amounts of eMII were affected by mutations; however, there was no correlation between them. This finding suggested that the C-terminal region of Gα not only stabilizes MII (active state) but also affects the nucleotide-binding site of Gα. Therefore, we measured the activation efficiency of these mutants by MII at several concentrations of GDP and GTP and calculated the rate constants of GDP release, GDP uptake, and GTP uptake. These rate constants of the Gi mutants were substantially different from those of the wild type, indicating that the replacement of the amino acid residues in the C-terminus alters the affinity of nucleotides. The rate constants of GDP uptake and GTP uptake showed a strong correlation, suggesting that the C-terminus of Giα controls the accessibility of the nucleotide-binding site. Therefore, our results strongly suggest that there is a long-range interlink between the C-terminus of Giα and its nucleotide-binding site.     

Phototautomerism of the GC base pair of DNA

Electronic spectra and ground and excited state electronic structures of normal G and rare tautomeric G1z.sbnd;C1 base pairs as well as of the individual rare tautomeric bases (purines and pyrimidines) have been studied using the VE-PPP molecular orbital method. The nature and consequences of the lowest energy purine-localized and purine to pyrimidine charge transfer type π?π1 singlet excitations of the base pairs have been investigated. The results indicate that in these excited states, particularly in the charge transfer excited state, the probability for the GC base pair to change over to G1C1 would be larger than in the ground state. The likeliness of the relevance of results obtained experimentally by other workers from the study of a model system to the GC base pair is discussed.     

Expression profile of the α subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein in rice

Previous studies on the activity of the rice Gα promoter using a β-Glucuronidase (GUS) reporter construct indicated that Gα expression was highest in developing organs and changed in a developmental stage-dependent manner. In this paper, GUS activity derived from the rice Gα promoter was analyzed in seeds and developing leaves. In seeds, GUS activity was detected in the aleurone layer, embryo, endosperm and scutellar epithelium. In developing leaves, the activity was detected in the mesophyll tissues, phloem and xylem of the leaf sheath and in the mesophyll tissue of the leaf blade. The activity in the aleurone layer and scutellar epithelium suggests that the Gα subunit may be involved in gibberellin signaling. The activity in the mesophyll tissues of the leaf blade suggests that the Gα subunit may be related to the intensity of disease resistance. The pattern of the activity in the developing leaf also indicates that the expression of Gα follows a developmental profile at the tissue level.Key words: expression pattern, Gα subunit, GUS staining pattern, heterotrimeric G protein, riceThe rice mutant d1 is deficient in the heterotrimeric G protein α subunit (Gα). Recently it was found that the dwarfism phenotype of d1 is due to a reduction in cell numbers.¹ This discovery has led to new questions regarding how rice Gα regulates cell number, and which other signaling molecules are involved in this process in various tissues and at different development stages. Studies of d1 suggest that rice Gα participates in both gibberellin signaling^2–4 and brassinosteroid signaling.^5–8 Promoter studies using the β-Glucuronidase (GUS) reporter indicate that Gα expression is highest in developing organs.¹ In this paper, we report on the expression pattern of a Gα promoter::GUS construct in seeds and developing leaves of rice.     

Activation of Gαq subunits up-regulates the expression of the tumor suppressor Fhit

The tumor suppressor Fhit protein is defective or absent in many tumor cells due to methylation, mutation or deletion of the FHIT gene. Despite numerous attempts to unravel the functions of Fhit, the mechanisms by which the function and expression of Fhit are regulated remain poorly understood. We have recently shown that activated Gα_q subunits interact directly with Fhit and enhance its inhibitory effect on cell growth. Here we investigated the regulation of Fhit expression by G_q. Our results showed that Fhit was up-regulated specifically by activating Gα subunits of the G_q subfamily but not by those of the other G protein subfamilies. This up-regulation effect was mediated by a PKC/MEK pathway independent of Src-mediated Fhit Tyr¹¹⁴ phosphorylation. We further demonstrated that elevated Fhit expression was due to the specific regulation of Fhit protein synthesis in the ribosome by activated Gα_q, where the regulations of cap-dependent protein synthesis were apparently not required. Moreover, we showed that activated Gα_q could increase cell–cell adhesion through Fhit. These findings provide a possible handle to modulate the level of the Fhit tumor suppressor by manipulating the activity of G_q-coupled receptors.     

Pivotal Role of Extended Linker 2 in the Activation of Gα by G Protein-coupled Receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) relay extracellular signals mainly to heterotrimeric G-proteins (Gαβγ) and they are the most successful drug targets. The mechanisms of G-protein activation by GPCRs are not well understood. Previous studies have revealed a signal relay route from a GPCR via the C-terminal α5-helix of Gα to the guanine nucleotide-binding pocket. Recent structural and biophysical studies uncover a role for the opening or rotating of the α-helical domain of Gα during the activation of Gα by a GPCR. Here we show that β-adrenergic receptors activate eight Gα_s mutant proteins (from a screen of 66 Gα_s mutants) that are unable to bind Gβγ subunits in cells. Five of these eight mutants are in the αF/Linker 2/β2 hinge region (extended Linker 2) that connects the Ras-like GTPase domain and the α-helical domain of Gα_s. This extended Linker 2 is the target site of a natural product inhibitor of G_q. Our data show that the extended Linker 2 is critical for Gα activation by GPCRs. We propose that a GPCR via its intracellular loop 2 directly interacts with the β₂/β₃ loop of Gα to communicate to Linker 2, resulting in the opening and closing of the α-helical domain and the release of GDP during G-protein activation.     

Regulators of G Protein Signaling Attenuate the G Protein–mediated Inhibition of N-Type Ca Channels

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind to the α subunits of certain heterotrimeric G proteins and greatly enhance their rate of GTP hydrolysis, thereby determining the time course of interactions among Gα, Gβγ, and their effectors. Voltage-gated N-type Ca channels mediate neurosecretion, and these Ca channels are powerfully inhibited by G proteins. To determine whether RGS proteins could influence Ca channel function, we recorded the activity of N-type Ca channels coexpressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells with G protein–coupled muscarinic (m2) receptors and various RGS proteins. Coexpression of full-length RGS3T, RGS3, or RGS8 significantly attenuated the magnitude of receptor-mediated Ca channel inhibition. In control cells expressing α1B, α2, and β3 Ca channel subunits and m2 receptors, carbachol (1 μM) inhibited whole-cell currents by ∼80% compared with only ∼55% inhibition in cells also expressing exogenous RGS protein. A similar effect was produced by expression of the conserved core domain of RGS8. The attenuation of Ca current inhibition resulted primarily from a shift in the steady state dose–response relationship to higher agonist concentrations, with the EC₅₀ for carbachol inhibition being ∼18 nM in control cells vs. ∼150 nM in RGS-expressing cells. The kinetics of Ca channel inhibition were also modified by RGS. Thus, in cells expressing RGS3T, the decay of prepulse facilitation was slower, and recovery of Ca channels from inhibition after agonist removal was faster than in control cells. The effects of RGS proteins on Ca channel modulation can be explained by their ability to act as GTPase-accelerating proteins for some Gα subunits. These results suggest that RGS proteins may play important roles in shaping the magnitude and kinetics of physiological events, such as neurosecretion, that involve G protein–modulated Ca channels.     

The β1 domain of protein G can replace the chorismate mutase domain of the T-protein

T-protein is composed of chorismate mutase (AroQ(T)) fused to the N-terminus of prephenate dehydrogenase (TyrA). Here, we report the replacement of AroQ(T) with the β1-domain of protein G (Gβ1). The TyrA domain shows a strong dehydrogenase activity within the context of this fusion, and our data indicate that Gβ1-TyrA folds into a dimeric conformation. Amino acid substitutions in the Gβ1 domain of Gβ1-TyrA identified residues involved in stabilizing the TyrA dimeric conformation. Gβ1 substitutions in the N-terminal β-hairpin eliminated Gβ1-TyrA expression, whereas Gβ1-TyrA tolerated Gβ1 substitutions in the C-terminal β-hairpin and in the α-helix. All of the characterized variants folded into a dimeric conformation. The importance of the β2-strand in forming a Gβ1 homo-dimerization interface explains the relevance of the first-β-hairpin in stabilizing the dimeric TyrA protein.     

A commentary on the G₂/M transition of the plant cell cycle

Background

The complex events of mitosis rely on precise timing and on immaculate preparation for their success, but the G₂/M transition in the plant cell cycle is currently steeped in controversy and alternative models.

Scope

In this brief review, the regulation of the G₂/M transition in plants is commented on. The extent to which the G₂/M transition is phosphoregulated by WEE1 kinase and CDC25 phosphatase, as exemplified in yeasts and animals, is discussed together with an alternative model that excludes these proteins from this transition. Arabidopsis T-DNA insertional lines for WEE1 and CDC25 that develop normally prompted the latter model. An argument is then presented that environmental stress is the norm for higher plants in temperate conditions. If so, the repressive role that WEE1 has under checkpoint conditions might be part of the normal cell cycle for many proliferative plant cells. Arabidopsis CDC25 can function as either a phosphatase or an arsenate reductase and recent evidence suggests that cdc25 knockouts are hypersensitive to hydroxyurea, a drug that induces the DNA-replication checkpoint. That other data show a null response of these knockouts to hydroxyurea leads to an airing of the controversy surrounding the enigmatic plant CDC25 at the G₂/M transition.     

Incorporation of a β-turn mimic in the N-terminal fragment of the B1 domain of streptococcal protein G

Summary A dibenzofuran-based β-turn mimic has been incorporated in the B1_2–29 fragment of the B1 domain of streptococcal protein G. This amino acid sequence adopts a β-hairpin structure in the complete B1 domain (B1_2–56). The modified peptide was studied by CD and NMR spectroscopy and its solution behavior was compared with the conformation adopted by the same sequence in the modified B1 domain.     

Genetic and Physical Interactions between Gα Subunits and Components of the Gβγ Dimer of Heterotrimeric G Proteins in Neurospora crassa

Heterotrimeric G proteins are critical regulators of growth and asexual and sexual development in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Three Gα subunits (GNA-1, GNA-2, and GNA-3), one Gβ subunit (GNB-1), and one Gγ subunit (GNG-1) have been functionally characterized, but genetic epistasis relationships between Gβ and Gα subunit genes have not been determined. Physical association between GNB-1 and FLAG-tagged GNG-1 has been previously demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation, but knowledge of the Gα binding partners for the Gβγ dimer is currently lacking. In this study, the three N. crassa Gα subunits are analyzed for genetic epistasis with gnb-1 and for physical interaction with the Gβγ dimer. We created double mutants lacking one Gα gene and gnb-1 and introduced constitutively active, GTPase-deficient alleles for each Gα gene into the Δgnb-1 background. Genetic analysis revealed that gna-3 is epistatic to gnb-1 with regard to negative control of submerged conidiation. gnb-1 is epistatic to gna-2 and gna-3 for aerial hyphal height, while gnb-1 appears to act upstream of gna-1 and gna-2 during aerial conidiation. None of the activated Gα alleles restored female fertility to Δgnb-1 mutants, and the gna-3^Q208L allele inhibited formation of female reproductive structures, consistent with a need for Gα proteins to cycle through the inactive GDP-bound form for these processes. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments using extracts from the gng-1-FLAG strain demonstrated that the three Gα proteins interact with the Gβγ dimer. The finding that the Gβγ dimer interacts with all three Gα proteins is supported by epistasis between gnb-1 and gna-1, gna-2, and gna-3 for at least one function.     

G��i and G�¦� Jointly Regulate the Conformations of a G�¦� Effector, the Neuronal G Protein-activated K+ Channel (GIRK)

Stable complexes among G proteins and effectors are an emerging concept in cell signaling. The prototypical Gβγ effector G protein-activated K⁺ channel (GIRK; Kir3) physically interacts with Gβγ but also with Gα_i/o. Whether and how Gα_i/o subunits regulate GIRK in vivo is unclear. We studied triple interactions among GIRK subunits 1 and 2, Gα_i3 and Gβγ. We used in vitro protein interaction assays and in vivo intramolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (i-FRET) between fluorophores attached to N and C termini of either GIRK1 or GIRK2 subunit. We demonstrate, for the first time, that Gβγ and Gα_i3 distinctly and interdependently alter the conformational states of the heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel. Biochemical experiments show that Gβγ greatly enhances the binding of GIRK1 subunit to Gα_i3^GDP and, unexpectedly, to Gα_i3^GTP. i-FRET showed that both Gα_i3 and Gβγ induced distinct conformational changes in GIRK1 and GIRK2. Moreover, GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits assumed unique, distinct conformations when coexpressed with a “constitutively active” Gα_i3 mutant and Gβγ together. These conformations differ from those assumed by GIRK1 or GIRK2 after separate coexpression of either Gα_i3 or Gβγ. Both biochemical and i-FRET data suggest that GIRK acts as the nucleator of the GIRK-Gα-Gβγ signaling complex and mediates allosteric interactions between Gα_i^GTP and Gβγ. Our findings imply that Gα_i/o and the Gα_iβγ heterotrimer can regulate a Gβγ effector both before and after activation by neurotransmitters.     

PAMAM G4 dendrimers affect the aggregation of α-synuclein

α-Synuclein (ASN) aggregation plays a key role in neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson's disease, and inhibition of fibril formation is a potential therapeutic strategy for these conditions. The aim of the present study was to investigate polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers (generations 4 and 3.5) as inhibitors of fibril formation in vitro by examining their interaction with ASN intrinsic tyrosine fluorescence. Furthermore, the effect of dendrimers on ASN aggregation was studied using circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and CD studies were complemented by a fluorescence assays using the dye thioflavin T (ThT). The PAMAM G4 dendrimer caused an increase in tyrosine residue fluorescence, and inhibited fibrillation of ASN; inhibited fibrillation was not observed with PAMAM G3.5 dendrimers.     

The β Subunit of the Heterotrimeric G Protein Triggers the Kluyveromyces lactis Pheromone Response Pathway in the Absence of the γ Subunit

The Kluyveromyces lactis heterotrimeric G protein is a canonical Gαβγ complex; however, in contrast to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where the Gγ subunit is essential for mating, disruption of the KlGγ gene yielded cells with almost intact mating capacity. Expression of a nonfarnesylated Gγ, which behaves as a dominant-negative in S. cerevisiae, did not affect mating in wild-type and ΔGγ cells of K. lactis. In contrast to the moderate sterility shown by the single ΔKlGα, the double ΔKlGα ΔKlGγ mutant displayed full sterility. A partial sterile phenotype of the ΔKlGγ mutant was obtained in conditions where the KlGβ subunit interacted defectively with the Gα subunit. The addition of a CCAAX motif to the C-end of KlGβ, partially suppressed the lack of both KlGα and KlGγ subunits. In cells lacking KlGγ, the KlGβ subunit cofractionated with KlGα in the plasma membrane, but in the ΔKlGα ΔKlGγ strain was located in the cytosol. When the KlGβ-KlGα interaction was affected in the ΔKlGγ mutant, most KlGβ fractionated to the cytosol. In contrast to the generic model of G-protein function, the Gβ subunit of K. lactis has the capacity to attach to the membrane and to activate mating effectors in absence of the Gγ subunit.     

Integration of G Protein α (Gα) Signaling by the Regulator of G Protein Signaling 14 (RGS14)

RGS14 contains distinct binding sites for both active (GTP-bound) and inactive (GDP-bound) forms of Gα subunits. The N-terminal regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) domain binds active Gα_i/o-GTP, whereas the C-terminal G protein regulatory (GPR) motif binds inactive Gα_i1/3-GDP. The molecular basis for how RGS14 binds different activation states of Gα proteins to integrate G protein signaling is unknown. Here we explored the intramolecular communication between the GPR motif and the RGS domain upon G protein binding and examined whether RGS14 can functionally interact with two distinct forms of Gα subunits simultaneously. Using complementary cellular and biochemical approaches, we demonstrate that RGS14 forms a stable complex with inactive Gα_i1-GDP at the plasma membrane and that free cytosolic RGS14 is recruited to the plasma membrane by activated Gα_o-AlF₄⁻. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer studies showed that RGS14 adopts different conformations in live cells when bound to Gα in different activation states. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry revealed that RGS14 is a very dynamic protein that undergoes allosteric conformational changes when inactive Gα_i1-GDP binds the GPR motif. Pure RGS14 forms a ternary complex with Gα_o-AlF₄⁻ and an AlF₄⁻-insensitive mutant (G42R) of Gα_i1-GDP, as observed by size exclusion chromatography and differential hydrogen/deuterium exchange. Finally, a preformed RGS14·Gα_i1-GDP complex exhibits full capacity to stimulate the GTPase activity of Gα_o-GTP, demonstrating that RGS14 can functionally engage two distinct forms of Gα subunits simultaneously. Based on these findings, we propose a working model for how RGS14 integrates multiple G protein signals in host CA2 hippocampal neurons to modulate synaptic plasticity.     

Regulation of G-Protein Signaling by RKTG via Sequestration of the Gβγ Subunit to the Golgi Apparatus

Upon ligand binding, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) impart the signal to heterotrimeric G proteins composed of α, β, and γ subunits, leading to dissociation of the Gα subunit from the Gβγ subunit. While the Gα subunit is imperative for downstream signaling, the Gβγ subunit, in its own right, mediates a variety of cellular responses such as GPCR desensitization via recruiting GRK to the plasma membrane and AKT stimulation. Here we report a mode of spatial regulation of the Gβγ subunit through alteration in subcellular compartmentation. RKTG (Raf kinase trapping to Golgi apparatus) is a newly characterized membrane protein specifically localized at the Golgi apparatus. The N terminus of RKTG interacts with Gβ and tethers Gβγ to the Golgi apparatus. Overexpression of RKTG impedes the interaction of Gβγ with GRK2, abrogates the ligand-induced change of subcellular distribution of GRK2, reduces isoproterenol-stimulated phosphorylation of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), and alters β2AR desensitization. In addition, RKTG inhibits Gβγ- and ligand-mediated AKT phosphorylation that is enhanced in cells with downregulation of RKTG. Silencing of RKTG also alters GRK2 internalization and compromises ligand-induced Gβ translocation to the Golgi apparatus. Taken together, our results reveal that RKTG can modulate GPCR signaling through sequestering Gβγ to the Golgi apparatus and thereby attenuating the functions of Gβγ.Heterotrimeric G proteins are composed of distinct Gα, β, and γ subunits which relay extracellular signals from heptahelical G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to downstream effectors (16, 25, 30). Gα binds Gβγ when Gα is bound with GDP but dissociates from Gβγ after GDP is replaced with GTP upon activation of GPCRs by extracellular ligand (25). Under physiologic conditions, the Gβ and Gγ subunits form a dimer in which the two subunits are not separable (10, 30). Although Gα is the primary protein that transmits the signal of GPCRs to specific intracellular effectors, such as adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C, emerging evidence has indicated that Gβγ is able to regulate GPCR signaling through interacting with GPCRs, the Gα subunit, and downstream effectors (30). Predominantly, Gβγ is able to directly interact with and affect the functions of a variety of membrane and intracellular effectors, such as ion channels, adenylyl cyclase, G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) (30). The current model of Gβγ-mediated signaling restricts it mostly to the plasma membrane (PM) (30). In the case of membrane-bound effectors, such as adenylyl cyclases or GIRK channels, Gβγ regulates the activities of these transmembrane proteins through conformational alteration. In the case of cytosolic proteins such as PLCβ2 or GRK2, whose substrates are localized to PM, Gβγ regulates their activity by recruiting the proteins to PM. The activity of Gβγ is primarily regulated by GPCR and Gα, in which GPCR activation leads to conformational changes of Gα. Such change causes replacement of Gα-bound GDP with GTP and release of Gβγ from the heterotrimeric G proteins. The activity of Gβγ could also be regulated by interacting with cytosolic proteins such as RACK1 (7). However, how Gβγ-mediated signaling is regulated in a spatial manner via subcellular compartmentation is largely unknown.GRK2 is a member of a family of GRKs that can phosphorylate the agonist-occupied GPCRs (4). Specific phosphorylation of activated receptors is associated with a decreased responsiveness of GPCR to prolonged stimulation by the agonist, also known as desensitization (15, 26). Gβγ regulates the activities of GRK2 and GRK3 toward several GPCRs (9). In cooperation with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, Gβγ binds to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of GRK2 and recruits GRK2 to PM, in which it phosphorylates activated GPCRs (18, 30). The crystallographic structure of GRK2 in complex with Gβ1γ2 has been solved (20, 32). On the other hand, AKT is an intracellular target of PI3K and plays a critical role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. It has been reported that Gβγ could activate AKT in a PI3K-dependent fashion (5), and Gβγ could mediate AKT activation at endosomes (13). Recent data also indicate that the p110β subunit of PI3K signals downstream of GPCR, and the AKT activation mediated by p110β is G protein dependent (14, 17).PAQR3 is a member of the progestin and adipoQ receptor (PAQR) family, and the members of this family are predicted to have seven transmembrane domains similar to GPCRs (31). Recently, we demonstrated that PAQR3 is localized at the Golgi apparatus and is involved in the spatial regulation of Raf kinase, whereby this protein was named Raf kinase trapping to Golgi apparatus (RKTG) (12). Biochemical analysis of RKTG suggested that its N terminus is localized on the cytoplasmic side of the Golgi membrane (21). Using the N terminus of RKTG to screen a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid library, we determined that RKTG is able to interact with Gβ, and detailed analyses indicate that RKTG is a spatial regulator of Gβγ signaling.     

Characterization of the putative α subunit of a heterotrimeric G protein in rice

A recombinant protein with a cDNA that encodes the putative subunit of a rice heterotrimeric G protein was synthesized in Escherichia coli and purified. The recombinant protein (rGrice ) with an apparent molecular mass of 45 kDa was bound with guanosine 5-(3-O-thio)triphosphate with an apparent association constant (kapp) of 0.36. The protein also hydrolyzed GTP and its Kcat was 0.44. rGrice was ADP-ribosylated by activated cholera toxin.Monoclonal antibodies raised against rGrice reacted with a 45 kDa polypeptide localized in the plasma membrane of rice seedlings. The peptide map of this polypeptide after digestion with V8 protease was identical to that of rGrice . A 45 kDa polypeptide in the plasma membrane, as well as rGrice , was ADP-ribosylated by activated cholera toxin. The GTPase activity of the plasma membrane was stimulated 2.5-fold by mastoparan 7 but not mastoparan 17. These properties were similar to those of the subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins in animals, suggesting that the putative subunit is truly the subunit itself.     

A constitutively active Gα subunit provides insights into the mechanism of G protein activation

The activation of Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a critical event underlying a variety of biological responses. Understanding how G proteins are activated will require structural and biochemical analyses of GPCRs complexed to their G protein partners, together with structure-function studies of Gα mutants that shed light on the different steps in the activation pathway. Previously, we reported that the substitution of a glycine for a proline at position 56 within the linker region connecting the helical and GTP-binding domains of a Gα chimera, designated αT*, yields a more readily exchangeable state for guanine nucleotides. Here we show that GDP-GTP exchange on αT*(G56P), in the presence of the light-activated GPCR, rhodopsin (R*), is less sensitive to the β1γ1 subunit complex than to wild-type αT*. We determined the X-ray crystal structure for the αT*(G56P) mutant and found that the G56P substitution leads to concerted changes that are transmitted to the conformationally sensitive switch regions, the α4-β6 loop, and the β6 strand. The α4-β6 loop has been proposed to be a GPCR contact site that signals to the TCAT motif and weakens the binding of the guanine ring of GDP, whereas the switch regions are the contact sites for the β1γ1 complex. Collectively, these biochemical and structural data lead us to suggest that αT*(G56P) may be adopting a conformation that is normally induced within Gα subunits by the combined actions of a GPCR and a Gβγ subunit complex during the G protein activation event.     

Association analysis of the E-selectin 98G > T polymorphism and the risk of childhood ischemic stroke

Genes related to platelet and arterial endothelial function have been recently considered as independent risk factors for stroke. We aimed to analyze a relationship between the E‐selectin 98G > T polymorphism and stroke in children and to observe the transmission of E‐selectin alleles from heterozygous parents to their affected children. We studied 59 children after stroke, 112 parents, and 87 healthy children. The E‐selectin 98G > T polymorphism was analyzed with the polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP) method. The frequency of the 98T allele in patients was almost twofold lower than in controls (5.1% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.145, odds ratios (OR) = 0.49) as well as carriers of the 98T allele (19.5% in controls vs. 8.5% in cases, p = 0.067, OR = 0.38). The G allele of the E‐selectin 98G > T polymorphism was more frequently transmitted to the children after stroke compared to the T allele (68% vs. 32%). In conclusion, we did not confirm the relationship between the 98G > T polymorphism of the E‐selectin gene and childhood ischemic stroke. There is still a need for further studies. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.