Microtubules,chromosome movement,and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation

The relationship between chromosome movement and mirotubules was explored by combining micromanipulation of living grasshopper spermatocytes with electron microscopy. We detached chromosomes from the spindle and placed them far out in the cytoplasm. Soon, the chromosomes began to move back toward the spindle and the cells were fixed at a chosen moment. The microtubules seen in three-dimensional reconstructions were correlated with the chromosome movement just prior to fixation. Before movement began, detached chromosomes had no kinetochore microtubules or a single one at most. Renewed movement was always accompanied by the reappearance of kinetochore microtubules; a single kinetochore microtubule appeared to suffice. Chromosome movements and kinetochore microtubule arrangements were unusual after reattachment, but their relationship was not: poleward forces, parallel to the kinetochore microtubule axis (as in normal anaphase), would explain the movement, however odd. The initial arrangement of kinetochore microtubules would have led to aberrant chromosome distribution if it persisted, but instead, reorientation to the appropriate arrangement always followed. Observations on living cells permitted us to place in sequence the kinetochore microtubule arrangements seen in fixed cells, revealing the microtubule transformations during reorientation. From the sequence of events we conclude that chromosome movement can cause reorientation to begin and that in the changes which follow, an unstable attachment of kinetochore microtubules to the spindle plays a major role.     

Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle

During mitosis a monooriented chromosome oscillates toward and away from its associated spindle pole and may be positioned many micrometers from the pole at the time of anaphase. We tested the hypothesis of Pickett-Heaps et al. (Pickett-Heaps, J. D., D. H. Tippit, and K. R. Porter, 1982, Cell, 29:729-744) that this behavior is generated by the sister kinetochores of a chromosome interacting with, and moving in opposite direction along, the same set of polar microtubules. When the sister chromatids of a monooriented chromosome split at the onset of anaphase in newt lung cells, the proximal chromatid remains stationary or moves closer to the pole, with the kinetochore leading. During this time the distal chromatid moves a variable distance radially away from the pole, with one or both chromatid arms leading. Subsequent electron microscopy of these cells revealed that the kinetochore on the distal chromatid is free of microtubules. These results suggest that the distal kinetochore is not involved in the positioning of a monooriented chromosome relative to the spindle pole or in its oscillatory movements. To test this conclusion we used laser microsurgery to create monooriented chromosomes containing one kinetochore. Correlative light and electron microscopy revealed that chromosomes containing one kinetochore continue to undergo normal oscillations. Additional observations on normal and laser-irradiated monooriented chromosomes indicated that the chromosome does not change shape, and that the kinetochore region is not deformed, during movement away from the pole. Thus movement away from the pole during an oscillation does not appear to arise from a push generated by the single pole-facing kinetochore fiber, as postulated (Bajer, A. S., 1982, J. Cell Biol., 93:33-48). When the chromatid arms of a monooriented chromosome are cut free of the kinetochore, they are immediately ejected radially outward from the spindle pole at a constant velocity of 2 micron/min. This ejection velocity is similar to that of the outward movement of an oscillating chromosome. We conclude that the oscillations of a monooriented chromosome and its position relative to the spindle pole result from an imbalance between poleward pulling forces acting at the proximal kinetochore and an ejection force acting along the chromosome, which is generated within the aster and half-spindle.     

Structure of kinetochore fibres in crane-fly spermatocytes after irradiation with an ultraviolet microbeam: neither microtubules nor actin filaments remain in the irradiated region

We studied chromosome movement after kinetochore microtubules were severed. Severing a kinetochore fibre in living crane-fly spermatocytes with an ultraviolet microbeam creates a kinetochore stub, a birefringent remnant of the spindle fibre connected to the kinetochore and extending only to the edge of the irradiated region. After the irradiation, anaphase chromosomes either move poleward led by their stubs or temporarily stop moving. We examined actin and/or microtubules in irradiated cells by means of confocal fluorescence microscopy or serial-section reconstructions from electron microscopy. For each cell thus examined, chromosome movement had been recorded continuously until the moment of fixation. Kinetochore microtubules were completely severed by the ultraviolet microbeam in cells in which chromosomes continued to move poleward after the irradiation: none were seen in the irradiated regions. Similarly, actin filaments normally present in kinetochore fibres were severed by the ultraviolet microbeam irradiations: the irradiated regions contained no actin filaments and only local spots of non-filamentous actin. There was no difference in irradiated regions when the associated chromosomes continued to move versus when they stopped moving. Thus, one cannot explain motion with severed kinetochore microtubules in terms of either microtubules or actin-filaments bridging the irradiated region. The data seem to negate current models for anaphase chromosome movement and support a model in which poleward chromosome movement results from forces generated within the spindle matrix that propel kinetochore fibres or kinetochore stubs poleward.     

The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore

I have tested two contending views of chromosome-to-pole movement in anaphase. Chromosomes might be pulled poleward by a traction fiber consisting of the kinetochore microtubules and associated motors, or they might propel themselves by a motor in the kinetochore. I cut through the spindle of demembranated grasshopper spermatocytes between the chromosomes and one pole and swept the polar region away, removing a portion of the would-be traction fiber. Chromosome movement continued, and in the best examples, chromosomes moved to within 1 micron of the cut edge. There is nothing beyond the edge to support movement, and a push from the rear is unlikely because cuts in the interzone behind the separating chromosomes did not stop movement. Therefore, I conclude that the motor must be in the kinetochore or within 1 micron of it. Less conclusive evidence points to the kinetochore itself as the motor. The alternative is an external motor pulling on the kinetochore microtubules or directly on the kinetochore. A pulling motor would move kinetochore microtubules along with the chromosome, so that in a cut half-spindle, the microtubules should protrude from the cut edge as chromosomes move toward it. No protrusion was seen; however, the possibility that microtubules depolymerize as they are extruded, though unlikely, is not ruled out. What is certain is that the motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase must be in the kinetochore or very close to it.     

Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase

Micromanipulation of living grasshopper spermatocytes in anaphase has been combined with electron microscopy to reveal otherwise obscure features of spindle organization. A chromosome is pushed laterally outside the spindle and stretched, and the cell is fixed with a novel, agar-treated glutaraldehyde solution. Two- and three-dimensional reconstructions from serial sections of seven cells show that kinetochore microtubules of the manipulated chromosome are shifted outside the confusing thicket of spindle microtubules and mechanical associations among microtubules are revealed by bent or shifted microtubules. These are the chief results: (a) The disposition of microtubules invariably is consistent with a skeletal role for spindle microtubules. (b) The kinetochore microtubule bundle is composed of short and long microtubules, with weak but recognizable mechanical associations among them. Some kinetochore microtubules are more tightly linked to one other microtubule within the bundle. (c) Microtubules of the kinetochore microtubule bundle are firmly connected to other spindle microtubules only near the pole, although some nonkinetochore microtubules of uncertain significance enter the bundle nearer to the kinetochore. (d) The kinetochore microtubules of adjacent chromosomes are mechanically linked, which provides an explanation for interdependent chromosome movement in "hinge anaphases." In the region of the spindle open to analysis after chromosome micromanipulation, microtubules may be linked mechanically by embedment in a gel, rather than by dynein or other specific, cross-bridging molecules.     

Chromosome movement and spindle birefringence in locally heated cells: Interaction versus local control

A microheater was used to produce a temperature gradient within the mitotic spindle of living cells. The slope of the temperature gradient was estimated from thermal conductivity calculations and confirmed by measurements of spindle birefringence and by experiments on striated muscle. When the microheater was placed at one spindle pole or at one group of kinetochores, the gradient was steep enough to cause a large difference in birefringence between the two half-spindles, but the velocity of chromosome movement in anaphase was nearly the same in the warmer and cooler half-spindles. When the heater was shifted from the pole toward the interzone, the average velocity of chromosome movement increased approximately two-fold but was, again, nearly uniform in the two half-spindles. The rate of spindle elongation was especially sensitive to the site of heating, increasing ten-fold when the heater was shifted from the pole to the interzone. Regardless of heater position, the rate of chromosome movement was determined largely by the temperature of the coolest spindle region —chromosomes in the warmer half-spindle moved more slowly than expected from estimates of the temperature in that region. Since the microheater produces a substantial temperature gradient within the spindle, the near uniformity of chromosome velocity in both half-spindles must be due to some biological property of the spindle. Two very different explanations for the results are considered the most likely. According to one explanation, the near uniformity of velocity in both half-spindles is determined by the structure of the interpolar spindle, while changes in velocity involve force producers located both in the half-spindles and in the interzone. On the other explanation, the velocity is nearly the same in both half-spindles because the force producers are located exclusively in the interzone (Margolis et al., 1978).This paper is dedicated to Professor Sally Hughes-Schrader with admiration and affection     

Kinetochores and microtubules wed without a ring

Proper chromosome segregation in mitosis requires tethering of spindle microtubules to the kinetochore. Using electron tomography of mammalian cells, McIntosh et al. (2008) now report the presence of fibrils that connect the inner kinetochore to the curved protofilaments at microtubule ends, suggesting a new model for force generation in chromosome movement.     

Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells

In mitotic cells, an error in chromosome segregation occurs when a chromosome is left near the spindle equator after anaphase onset (lagging chromosome). In PtK1 cells, we found 1.16% of untreated anaphase cells exhibiting lagging chromosomes at the spindle equator, and this percentage was enhanced to 17.55% after a mitotic block with 2 microM nocodazole. A lagging chromosome seen during anaphase in control or nocodazole-treated cells was found by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy to be a single chromatid with its kinetochore attached to kinetochore microtubule bundles extending toward opposite poles. This merotelic orientation was verified by electron microscopy. The single kinetochores of lagging chromosomes in anaphase were stretched laterally (1.2--5.6-fold) in the directions of their kinetochore microtubules, indicating that they were not able to achieve anaphase poleward movement because of pulling forces toward opposite poles. They also had inactivated mitotic spindle checkpoint activities since they did not label with either Mad2 or 3F3/2 antibodies. Thus, for mammalian cultured cells, kinetochore merotelic orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy not detected by the mitotic spindle checkpoint. The expanded and curved crescent morphology exhibited by kinetochores during nocodazole treatment may promote the high incidence of kinetochore merotelic orientation that occurs after nocodazole washout.     

Effect of elevated temperatures on spindle microtubules and chromosome movements in cultured newt lung cells

The effect of elevated temperature shocks (ETS) on anaphase chromosome movements and spindle structure was studied in lung epithelial cells cultured from the newt Taricha granulosa granulosa. Mitosis proceeds normally up to temperatures of 31--32 degrees C. At slightly higher temperatures (33--34 degrees C) anaphase is desynchronized while still higher temperatures (35--36 degrees C) arrest chromosome movements. The desynchronization of chromosome movement is related on the ultrastructural level to the re-arrangement of kinetochore fibre microtubules (Mts) into hexagonally packed structures, and with the disappearance of non-kinetochore Mts. During desynchronized movement the distance a chromosome travels depends on the structure of its kinetochore fibre: those which have divergent kinetochore fibre Mts approach the poles, while those with hexagonally packed kinetochore fibre Mts do not. The data provide evidence concerning the anchorage of Mts and demonstrate that normal anaphase chromosome movements are functionally related both to the rearrangement of kinetochore Mts and to Mt disassembly.     

Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle

We have microinjected biotinylated tubulin into mitotic fibroblast cells to identify the sites in the spindle at which new subunits are incorporated into microtubules (MTs). Labeled subunits were visualized in the electron microscope using an antibody to biotin followed by a secondary antibody coupled to colloidal gold. Astral MTs incorporate labeled subunits very rapidly by elongation of existing MTs and by new nucleation from the centrosome. At a slower rate, kinetochore MTs incorporate subunits at the kinetochore progressively during metaphase, suggesting a slow poleward flux of subunits in the kinetochore fiber. When cells injected in metaphase were examined in anaphase, a significant fraction of kinetochore MTs was unlabeled, suggesting that depolymerization had occurred at the kinetochore concomitant with chromosome to pole movement. The existence of opposite fluxes at the kinetochore during metaphase and anaphase suggests that two separate forces are responsible for chromosome congression and anaphase movement.     

The mechanism of kinetochore-spindle attachment and polewards movement analyzed in PtK2 cells at the prophase-prometaphase transition

PtK2 cells at the prophase-prometaphase transition were analyzed to study the origin of kinetochore microtubules, the mode of kinetochore fiber construction and the mechanism of polewards movement. Attention was focused on chromosomes which, as deduced from video time-lapse tapes, had just started their initial characteristic movement towards one of the poles. In the same cell, the arrangement of microtubules in the vicinity of the kinetochore region was visualized either with indirect immunofluorescence and confocal fluorescence microscopy, or with electron microscopy in semithin sections of cells, immunostained for microtubules and embedded in epon. The results strengthen the evidence that kinetochore microtubules are nucleated in the centrosomal region. Bundles of microtubules, some ending at the kinetochore and others passing beyond it, are formed rapidly, seemingly without influencing the rapid rate of movement. They also show that microtubules often establish contact with kinetochores by lateral interaction, prior to kinetochore-pole orientation, and that kinetochores can move polewards along the microtubule wall of attached microtubules, independently of the latter's dynamics. These findings confirm and extend to the earliest chromosome movements at the prophase-prometaphase transition, the results of Rieder and Alexander (J. Cell Biol. 110, 81-95, (1990)), who studied the attachment and polewards movement of chromosomes strongly delayed in forming an attachment to the spindle. They are discussed in the light of recent evidence for the localization of dynein to kinetochores and contemporary models for kinetochore structure and function.     

Direct visualization of microtubule flux during metaphase and anaphase in crane-fly spermatocytes

Microtubule flux in spindles of insect spermatocytes, long-used models for studies on chromosome behavior during meiosis, was revealed after iontophoretic microinjection of rhodamine-conjugated (rh)-tubulin and fluorescent speckle microscopy. In time-lapse movies of crane-fly spermtocytes, fluorescent speckles generated when rh-tubulin incorporated at microtubule plus ends moved poleward through each half-spindle and then were lost from microtubule minus ends at the spindle poles. The average poleward velocity of approximately 0.7 microm/min for speckles within kinetochore microtubules at metaphase increased during anaphase to approximately 0.9 microm/min. Segregating half-bivalents had an average poleward velocity of approximately 0.5 microm/min, about half that of speckles within shortening kinetochore fibers. When injected during anaphase, rhtubulin was incorporated at kinetochores, and kinetochore fiber fluorescence spread poleward as anaphase progressed. The results show that tubulin subunits are added to the plus end of kinetochore microtubules and are removed from their minus ends at the poles, all while attached chromosomes move poleward during anaphase A. The results cannot be explained by a Pac-man model, in which 1) kinetochore-based, minus end-directed motors generate poleward forces for anaphase A and 2) kinetochore microtubules shorten at their plus ends. Rather, in these cells, kinetochore fiber shortening during anaphase A occurs exclusively at the minus ends of kinetochore microtubules.     

The three-dimensional architecture of chromosome fibres in the crane fly

Microtubules of amphitelically oriented sex univalent chromosome fibres were traced in longitudinal serial sections. The investigated chromosomes were from four different cells representing consecutive stages of anaphase segregation. A correlation was found between chromosome movement and a characteristic distribution of free microtubules (fMTs) oriented obliquely with respect to the kinetochore microtubules. During chromosome segregation the proportion of these skew fMTs (the proportion of skew fMTs is a measure of the degree of disorder in the fibre) is higher in the fibre pointing in the direction of movement than in the trailing fibre. The results are discussed in relation to spindle forces. Although the anaphase of amphitelic sex chromosomes is different in several respects (orientation of chromosome fibres, mutual connexion of chromosomes via kinetochore microtubules, spindle elongation occurring simultaneously), the observations on the distribution of fMTs in the chromosome fibres is, in principle, compatible with those previously made on syntelic autosomes.     

Rapid backward movement of anaphase chromosome whose kinetochore fibers were cut by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation

Summary— kinetochore spindle fibers in meiosis I and II grasshopper spermatocytes were cut with a heterochromatic ultraviolet (UV) microbeam converging on the specimen to form a slit-shaped microspot 1.5 × 8 μm or 3 × 8 μm. A total exposure of 3 × 10^?8 joules per μm² was administered within 0.8–2.4 s, which was sufficient for severing. The cells were observed with a high extinction polarizing microscope or phase contrast optics and a record made by time-lapse video microscopy, continuously before, during and after the irradiation. When kinetochore fibers were irradiated i anaphase with UV, an area of reduced birefringence (ARB) was produced at the exposed site. The newly created + ends of the microtubules rapidly disassembled poleward, at a constant speed of 17 μm/min. The — ends at the edge of ARB also depolymerized at a slower rate. When a kinetochore fiber was cut with UV in early anaphase at which time its associated chromosome had not disjoined from the partner chromosome, the chromosome of the irradiated kinetochore fiber moved rapidly back to its partner. The speed during this movement was faster than the normal poleward chromosome movement in anaphase by an order to magnitude or more. When a kinetochore and its associated kinetochore fiber were included in the irradiation are, the effects were more pronounced than the effects of irradiation on a kinetochore fiber alone; the direction of the line connecting the irradiated half-bivalent with the partner half-bivalent deviated so much from the longitudinal axis of the original spindle with time that the division assumed a tripolar figure.     

Cell division and the microtubular cytoskeleton]

Kinetochore microtubules result from an interaction between astral microtubules and the kinetochore of the chromosomes after breakdown of the nuclear envelope at the end of prophase. In this process, the end of a microtubule projecting from one of the polar regions contacts the primary constriction of a chromosome. The latter then undergoes rapid poleward movement. Concerning the mechanism of anaphase chromosome movement, the motive force for the chromosome-to-pole movement appears to be generated at the kinetochore or in the region very close to it. It has not been determined whether chromosomes propel themselves along stationary kinetochore microtubules by a motor at the kinetochore, or they are pulled poleward by a traction fiber consisting of kinetochore microtubules and associated motors. As chromosomes move poleward coordinate disassembly of kinetochore microtubules might occur from their kinetochore ends. In diatom and yeast spindles, elongation of the spindle in anaphase (anaphase B) may be explained by microtubule assembly at polar microtubule ends in the spindle mid-zone and sliding of the antiparallel microtubules from the opposite poles. The sliding force appears to be generated through an ATP-dependent microtubule motor. In isolated sea urchin spindles, the microtubule assembly at the equator alone might provide the force for spindle elongation, although, in addition, involvement of microtubule sliding by a GTP-requiring mechanochemical enzyme cannot be excluded. Discussions were made on possible participation in anaphase chromosome movement of such microtubule motors as dynein, kinesin, dynamin and the claret segregation protein.     

Mitotic Protein CSPP1 Interacts with CENP-H Protein to Coordinate Accurate Chromosome Oscillation in Mitosis

Mitotic chromosome segregation is orchestrated by the dynamic interaction of spindle microtubules with the kinetochores. During chromosome alignment, kinetochore-bound microtubules undergo dynamic cycles between growth and shrinkage, leading to an oscillatory movement of chromosomes along the spindle axis. Although kinetochore protein CENP-H serves as a molecular control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics, the mechanistic link between CENP-H and kinetochore microtubules (kMT) has remained less characterized. Here, we show that CSPP1 is a kinetochore protein essential for accurate chromosome movements in mitosis. CSPP1 binds to CENP-H in vitro and in vivo. Suppression of CSPP1 perturbs proper mitotic progression and compromises the satisfaction of spindle assembly checkpoint. In addition, chromosome oscillation is greatly attenuated in CSPP1-depleted cells, similar to what was observed in the CENP-H-depleted cells. Importantly, CSPP1 depletion enhances velocity of kinetochore movement, and overexpression of CSPP1 decreases the speed, suggesting that CSPP1 promotes kMT stability during cell division. Specific perturbation of CENP-H/CSPP1 interaction using a membrane-permeable competing peptide resulted in a transient mitotic arrest and chromosome segregation defect. Based on these findings, we propose that CSPP1 cooperates with CENP-H on kinetochores to serve as a novel regulator of kMT dynamics for accurate chromosome segregation.     

Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells

During mitosis in cultured newt pneumocytes, one or more chromosomes may become positioned well removed (greater than 50 microns) from the polar regions during early prometaphase. As a result, these chromosomes are delayed for up to 5 h in forming an attachment to the spindle. The spatial separation of these chromosomes from the polar microtubule-nucleating centers provides a unique opportunity to study the initial stages of kinetochore fiber formation in living cells. Time-lapse Nomarski-differential interference contrast videomicroscopic observations reveal that late-attaching chromosomes always move, upon attachment, into a single polar region (usually the one closest to the chromosome). During this attachment, the kinetochore region of the chromosome undergoes a variable number of transient poleward tugs that are followed, shortly thereafter, by rapid movement of the chromosome towards the pole. Anti-tubulin immunofluorescence and serial section EM reveal that the kinetochores and kinetochore regions of nonattached chromosomes lack associated microtubules. By contrast, these methods reveal that the attachment and subsequent poleward movement of a chromosome correlates with the association of a single long microtubule with one of the kinetochores of the chromosome. This microtubule traverses the entire distance between the spindle pole and the kinetochore and often extends well past the kinetochore. From these results, we conclude that the initial attachment of a chromosome to the newt pneumocyte spindle results from an interaction between a single polar-nucleated microtubule and one of the kinetochores on the chromosome. Once this association is established, the kinetochore is rapidly transported poleward along the surface of the microtubule by a mechanism that is not dependent on microtubule depolymerization. Our results further demonstrate that the motors for prometaphase chromosome movement must be either on the surface of the kinetochore (i.e., within the corona but not the plate), distributed along the surface of the kinetochore microtubules, or both.     

Micromanipulation of Chromosomes in Mitotic Vertebrate Tissue Cells: Tension Controls the State of Kinetochore Movement

In mitotic vertebrate tissue cells, chromosome congression to the spindle equator in prometaphase and segregation to the poles in anaphase depend on the movements of kinetochores at their kinetochore microtubule attachment sites. To test if kinetochores sense tension to control their states of movement poleward (P) and away from the pole (AP), we applied an external force to the spindle in preanaphase newt epithelial cells by stretching chromosome arms with microneedles. For monooriented chromosomes (only one kinetochore fiber), an abrupt stretch of an arm away from the attached pole induced the single attached kinetochore to persist in AP movement at about 2 μm/min velocity, resulting in chromosome movement away from the pole. When the stretch was reduced or the needle removed, the kinetochore switched to P movement at about 2 μm/min and pulled the chromosome back to near the premanipulation position within the spindle. For bioriented chromosomes (sister kinetochores attached to opposite poles) near the spindle equator, stretching one arm toward a pole placed the kinetochore facing away from the direction of stretch under tension and the sister facing toward the stretch under reduced tension or compression. Kinetochores under increased tension exhibited prolonged AP movement while kinetochores under reduced tension or compression exhibited prolonged P movement, moving the centromeres at about 2 μm/min velocities off the metaphase plate in the direction of stretch. Removing the needle resulted in centromere movement back to near the spindle equator at similar velocities. These results show that tension controls the direction of kinetochore movement and associated kinetochore microtubule assembly/disassembly to position centromeres within the spindle of vertebrate tissue cells. High tension induces persistent AP movement while low tension induces persistent P movement. The velocity of P and AP movement appears to be load independent and governed by the molecular mechanisms which attach kinetochores to the dynamic ends of kinetochore microtubules.     

Structural implications of kinetochore function in sucrose-treated PtK1 cells

Treatment of PtK1 cells during metaphase with solutions containing hyperosmotic concentrations of sucrose resulted in an alteration of kinetochore structure and function in a concentration-dependent manner. This alteration in kinetochore morphology was shown to be rapidly reversible upon removal of the sucrose-containing tissue culture medium. A 10-min treatment with both 0.2 M and 0.4 M sucrose resulted in a concentration-dependent aggregation of spindle fibers into bundles, loss of trilaminar kinetochore morphology as judged by electron microscopy, and induction of anaphase B-like spindle elongation as previously described. Electron microscopy showed that a 10-min treatment of metaphase cells with hyperosmotic concentrations of sucrose changed the trilaminar kinetochore structure to one of a single lamina, with an amorphous, lightly staining material distally associated with it. Sucrose-induced bundles of microtubules could usually be seen embedded or tangentially associated with this material. Rate and extent of spindle elongation in sucrose-treated metaphase cells were greater in the higher concentrations of sucrose employed. The degree of microtubule bundling was also concentration dependent, with reduced bundling occurring at lower sucrose concentrations. Within 2 min after sucrose removal kinetochores returned to a bi- or trilaminar morphology with reduction in the amount of amorphous material. Reformation of the kinetochore trilaminar structure resembled that of the normal maturation process which occurs from prophase through anaphase. These rapid changes in kinetochore morphology following release from sucrose treatment were temporally associated with restoration of spindle function and suggested that kinetochore integrity was necessary for the expression of spindle forces responsible for spindle shortening. These forces are probably generated or transduced by the continuum formed between the two spindle poles, the kinetochore microtubules, and the sister chromatids.     

Polarity of kinetochore microtubules in Chinese hamster ovary cells after recovery from a colcemid block

The polarity of kinetochore microtubules was determined in a system for which kinetochore-initiated microtubule assembly has been demonstrated. Chinese hamster ovary cells were treated with 0.3 micrograms/ml colcemid for 8 h and then released from the block. Prior to recovery, microtubules were completely absent from the cells. The recovery was monitored using light and electron microscopy to establish that the cells progress through anaphase and that the kinetochore fibers are fully functional. Since early stages of recovery are characterized by short microtubule segments that terminate in the kinetochore fibrous corona rather than on the outer disk, microtubule polarity was determined at later stages of recovery when longer kinetochore bundles had formed, allowing us to establish unambiguously the spatial relationship between microtubules, kinetochores, and chromosomes. The cells were lysed in a detergent mixture containing bovine brain tubulin under conditions that allowed the formation of polarity-revealing hooks. 20 kinetochore bundles were assayed for microtubule polarity in either thick or thin serial sections. We found that 95% of the decorated kinetochore microtubules had the same polarity and that, according to the hook curvature, the plus ends of the microtubules were at the kinetochores. Hence, the polarity of kinetochore microtubules in Chinese hamster ovary cells recovering from a colcemid block is the same as in normal untreated cells. This result suggests that microtubule polarity is likely to be important for spindle function since kinetochore microtubules show the same polarity, regardless of the pattern of spindle formation.