SNARE assembly and membrane fusion, a kinetic analysis

SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) assembly may promote intracellular membrane fusion, an essential process for vesicular transport in cells. Core complex formation between vesicle-associated SNARE and target membrane SNARE perhaps drives the merging of two membranes into a single bilayer. Using spin-labeling EPR, trans-SNARE complex formation was monitored "locally" at four different core locations of recombinant yeast SNAREs, which are individually reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. The results indicate that the time scales of core formation are virtually the same at all four locations throughout the core region, indicating the possibility of a single step core assembly, which appears to be somewhat different from what has been postulated by the "zipper" model. The EPR data were then compared with the kinetics of the lipid mixing measured with the fluorescence assay. The analysis suggests that SNARE core assembly occurs on a much faster time scale than the lipid mixing, providing a new insight into the timing of individual events in SNARE-induced membrane fusion.     

Formation and Turnover of NSF- and SNAP-containing “Fusion” Complexes Occur on Undocked, Clathrin-coated Vesicle–derived Membranes

Specificity of vesicular transport is determined by pair-wise interaction between receptors (SNAP receptors or SNAREs) associated with a transport vesicle and its target membrane. Two additional factors, N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) and soluble NSF attachment protein (SNAP) are ubiquitous components of vesicular transport pathways. However, the precise role they play is not known. On the basis that NSF and SNAP can be recruited to preformed SNARE complexes, it has been proposed that NSF- and SNAP-containing complexes are formed after SNARE-dependent docking of transport vesicles. This would enable ATPase-dependent complex disassembly to be coupled directly to membrane fusion. Alternatively, binding and release of NSF/SNAP may occur before vesicle docking, and perhaps be involved in the activation of SNAREs. To gain more information about the point at which so-called 20S complexes form during the transport vesicle cycle, we have examined NSF/SNAP/SNARE complex turnover on clathrin-coated vesicle–derived membranes in situ. This has been achieved under conditions in which the extent of membrane docking can be precisely monitored. We demonstrate by UV-dependent cross-linking experiments, coupled to laser light-scattering analysis of membranes, that complexes containing NSF, SNAP, and SNAREs will form and dissociate on the surface of undocked transport vesicles.     

A partially zipped SNARE complex stabilized by the membrane

The SNARE complex acts centrally for intracellular membrane fusion, an essential process for vesicular transport in cells. Association between vesicle-associated (v-) SNARE and target membrane (t-) SNARE results in the coiled coil core that bridges two membranes. Here, the structure of the SNARE complex assembled by recombinant t-SNARE Sso1p/Sec9 and v-SNARE Snc2p, which are involved in post-Golgi trafficking in yeast, was investigated using EPR. In detergent solutions, SNAREs formed a fully assembled core. However, when t-SNAREs were reconstituted into the proteoliposome and mixed with the soluble SNARE motif of Snc2p, a partially zipped core in which the N-terminal region is structured, whereas the C-terminal region is frayed, was detected. The partially zipped and fully assembled complexes coexisted with little free energy difference between them. Thus, the core complex formation of yeast SNAREs might not serve as the energy source for the fusion, which is different from what has been known for neuronal SNAREs. On the other hand, the results from the proteoliposome fusion assay, employing cysteine- and nitroxide-scanning mutants of Sso1p, suggested that the formation of the complete core is required for membrane fusion. This implies that core SNARE assembly plays an essential role in setting up the proper geometry of the lipid-protein complex for the successful fusion.     

Syntaxin 6: the promiscuous behaviour of a SNARE protein

Vesicle flow within the cell is responsible for the dynamic maintenance of and communication between intracellular compartments. In addition, vesicular transport is crucial for communication between the cell and its surrounding environment. The ability of a vesicle to recognise and fuse with an appropriate compartment or vesicle is determined by its protein and lipid composition as well as by proteins in the cytosol. SNARE proteins present on both vesicle as well as target organelle membranes provide one component necessary for the process of membrane fusion. While in mammalian cells the main focus of interest about SNARE function has centred on those involved in exocytosis, recent data on SNAREs involved in intracellular membrane-trafficking steps have provided a deeper insight into the properties of these proteins. We take, as an example, the promiscuous SNARE syntaxin 6, a SNARE involved in multiple membrane fusion events. The properties of syntaxin 6 reveal similarities but also differences in the behaviour of intracellular SNAREs and the highly specialised exocytotic SNARE molecules.     

Cysteine-disulfide cross-linking to monitor SNARE complex assembly during endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi transport

Assembly of cognate SNARE proteins into SNARE complexes is required for many intracellular membrane fusion reactions. However, the mechanisms that govern SNARE complex assembly and disassembly during fusion are not well understood. We have devised a new in vitro cross-linking assay to monitor SNARE complex assembly during fusion of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-derived vesicles with Golgi-acceptor membranes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, anterograde ER-Golgi transport requires four SNARE proteins: Sec22p, Bos1p, Bet1p, and Sed5p. After tethering of ER-derived vesicles to Golgi-acceptor membranes, SNARE proteins are thought to assemble into a four-helix coiled-coil bundle analogous to the structurally characterized neuronal and endosomal SNARE complexes. Molecular modeling was used to generate a structure of the four-helix ER-Golgi SNARE complex. Based on this structure, cysteine residues were introduced into adjacent SNARE proteins such that disulfide bonds would form if assembled into a SNARE complex. Our initial studies focused on disulfide bond formation between the SNARE motifs of Bet1p and Sec22p. Expression of SNARE cysteine derivatives in the same strain produced a cross-linked heterodimer of Bet1p and Sec22p under oxidizing conditions. Moreover, this Bet1p-Sec22p heterodimer formed during in vitro transport reactions when ER-derived vesicles containing the Bet1p derivative fused with Golgi membranes containing the Sec22p derivative. Using this disulfide cross-linking assay, we show that inhibition of transport with anti-Sly1p antibodies blocked formation of the Bet1p-Sec22p heterodimer. In contrast, chelation of divalent cations did not inhibit formation of the Bet1p-Sec22p heterodimer during in vitro transport but potently inhibited Golgi-specific carbohydrate modification of glyco-pro-alpha factor. This data suggests that Ca(2+) is not directly required for membrane fusion between ER-derived vesicles and Golgi-acceptor membranes.     

Docking of liposomes to planar surfaces mediated by trans-SNARE complexes

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) play a key role in membrane fusion in the secretory pathway. In vitro, SNAREs spontaneously assemble into helical SNARE complexes with the transmembrane domains at the C-terminal end. During fusion, SNAREs are thought to bridge the two membranes and assemble in a zipper-like fashion, pulling the membranes together and initiating fusion. However, it is not clear to what extent SNARE assembly contributes to membrane attachment and membrane fusion. Using the neuronal SNAREs synaptobrevin (VAMP), SNAP-25, and syntaxin as examples, we show here that liposomes containing synaptobrevin firmly attach to planar surfaces containing immobilized syntaxin. Attachment requires the formation of SNARE complexes because it is dependent on the presence of SNAP-25. Binding is competed for by soluble SNARE fragments, with noncognate SNAREs such as endobrevin (VAMP8), VAMP4, and VAMP7 (Ti-VAMP) being effective but less potent in some cases. Furthermore, although SNAP-23 is unable to substitute for SNAP-25 in the attachment assay, it forms complexes of comparable stability and is capable of substituting in liposome fusion assays. Vesicle attachment is initiated by SNARE assembly at the N-terminal end of the helix bundle. We conclude that SNAREs can indeed form stable trans-complexes that result in vesicle attachment if progression to fusion is prevented, further supporting the zipper model of SNARE function.     

Asymmetric requirements for a Rab GTPase and SNARE proteins in fusion of COPII vesicles with acceptor membranes

Soluble NSF attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins are essential for membrane fusion in transport between the yeast ER and Golgi compartments. Subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrate that the ER/Golgi SNAREs Bos1p, Sec22p, Bet1p, Sed5p, and the Rab protein, Ypt1p, are distributed similarly but localize primarily with Golgi membranes. All of these SNARE proteins are efficiently packaged into COPII vesicles and suggest a dynamic cycling of SNARE machinery between ER and Golgi compartments. Ypt1p is not efficiently packaged into vesicles under these conditions. To determine in which membranes protein function is required, temperature-sensitive alleles of BOS1, BET1, SED5, SLY1, and YPT1 that prevent ER/Golgi transport in vitro at restrictive temperatures were used to selectively inactivate these gene products on vesicles or on Golgi membranes. Vesicles bearing mutations in Bet1p or Bos1p inhibit fusion with wild-type acceptor membranes, but acceptor membranes containing these mutations are fully functional. In contrast, vesicles bearing mutations in Sed5p, Sly1p, or Ypt1p are functional, whereas acceptor membranes containing these mutations block fusion. Thus, this set of SNARE proteins is symmetrically distributed between vesicle and acceptor compartments, but they function asymmetrically such that Bet1p and Bos1p are required on vesicles and Sed5p activity is required on acceptor membranes. We propose the asymmetry in SNARE protein function is maintained by an asymmetric distribution and requirement for the Ypt1p GTPase in this fusion event. When a transmembrane-anchored form of Ypt1p is used to restrict this GTPase to the acceptor compartment, vesicles depleted of Ypt1p remain competent for fusion.     

Extracting sequence motifs and the phylogenetic features of SNARE-dependent membrane traffic

The SNARE proteins are required for membrane fusion during intracellular vesicular transport and for its specificity. Only the unique combination of SNARE proteins (cognates) can be bound and can lead to membrane fusion, although the characteristics of the possible specificity of the binding combinations encoded in the SNARE sequences have not yet been determined. We discovered by whole genome sequence analysis that sequence motifs (conserved sequences) in the SNARE motif domains for each protein group correspond to localization sites or transport pathways. We claim that these motifs reflect the specificity of the binding combinations of SNARE motif domains. Using these motifs, we could classify SNARE proteins from 48 organisms into their localization sites or transport pathways. The classification result shows that more than 10 SNARE subgroups are kingdom specific and that the SNARE paralogs involved in the plasma membrane-related transport pathways have developed greater variations in higher animals and higher plants than those involved in the endoplasmic reticulum-related transport pathways throughout eukaryotic evolution.     

Action of complexin on SNARE complex

Calcium-dependent synaptic vesicle exocytosis requires three SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment protein receptor) proteins: synaptobrevin/vesicle-associated membrane protein in the vesicular membrane and syntaxin and SNAP-25 in the presynaptic membrane. The SNAREs form a thermodynamically stable complex that is believed to drive fusion of vesicular and presynaptic membranes. Complexin, also known as synaphin, is a neuronal cytosolic protein that acts as a positive regulator of synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Complexin binds selectively to the neuronal SNARE complex, but how this promotes exocytosis remains unknown. Here we used purified full-length and truncated SNARE proteins and a gel shift assay to show that the action of complexin on SNARE complex depends strictly on the transmembrane regions of syntaxin and synaptobrevin. By means of a preparative immunoaffinity procedure to achieve total extraction of SNARE complex from brain, we demonstrated that complexin is the only neuronal protein that tightly associates with it. Our data indicated that, in the presence of complexin, the neuronal SNARE proteins assemble directly into a complex in which the transmembrane regions interact. We propose that complexin facilitates neuronal exocytosis by promoting interaction between the complementary syntaxin and synaptobrevin transmembrane regions that reside in opposing membranes prior to fusion.     

Distinct cellular locations of the syntaxin family of proteins in rat pancreatic acinar cells.

Syntaxins are cytoplasmically oriented integral membrane soluble NEM-sensitive factor receptors (SNAREs; soluble NEM-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors) thought to serve as targets for the assembly of protein complexes important in regulating membrane fusion. The SNARE hypothesis predicts that the fidelity of vesicle traffic is controlled in part by the correct recognition of vesicle SNAREs with their cognate target SNARE partner. Here, we show that in the exocrine acinar cell of the pancreas, multiple syntaxin isoforms are expressed and that they appear to reside in distinct membrane compartments. Syntaxin 2 is restricted to the apical plasma membrane whereas syntaxin 4 is found most abundantly on the basolateral membranes. Surprisingly, syntaxin 3 was found to be localized to a vesicular compartment, the zymogen granule membrane. In addition, we show that these proteins are capable of specific interaction with vesicle SNARE proteins. Their nonoverlapping locations support the general principle of the SNARE hypothesis and provide new insights into the mechanisms of polarized secretion in epithelial cells.     

v-SNARE actions during Ca(2+)-triggered exocytosis

Assembly of SNARE proteins between opposing membranes mediates fusion of synthetic liposomes, but it is unknown whether SNAREs act during exocytosis at the moment of Ca(2+) increase, providing the molecular force for fusion of secretory vesicles. Here, we show that execution of pre- and postfusional steps during chromaffin granule exocytosis depends crucially on a short molecular distance between the complex-forming SNARE motif and the transmembrane anchor of the vesicular SNARE protein synaptobrevin II. Extending the juxtamembrane region of synaptobrevin by insertion of flexible "linkers" reduces priming of granules, delays initiation of exocytosis upon stepwise elevation of intracellular calcium, attenuates fluctuations of early fusion pores, and slows rapid expansion of the pore in a linker-length dependent fashion. These observations provide evidence that v-SNARE proteins drive Ca(2+)-triggered membrane fusion at millisecond time scale and support a model wherein continuous molecular pulling by SNAREs guides the vesicle throughout the consecutive stages of exocytosis.     

Regulation of neuronal SNARE assembly by the membrane

In the neuron, SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors) assembly acts centrally in driving membrane fusion, a required process for neurotransmitter release. In the cytoplasm, vesicular SNARE VAMP-2 (vesicle-associated membrane protein-2) engages with two plasma membrane SNAREs, syntaxin 1A and SNAP-25 (synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kDa), to form the core complex that bridges two membranes. Although various factors regulate SNARE assembly, the membrane also aids in regulation by trapping VAMP-2 in the membrane. Fluorescence and EPR analyses revealed that the insertion of seven C-terminal core-forming residues into the membrane controls complex formation of the entire core region, even though the preceding 54 core-forming residues are fully exposed and freely moving. When two interfacial tryptophan residues in this region were replaced with hydrophilic serine residues, the mutation supported rapid complex formation. The results suggest that the membrane-proximal region of VAMP-2 is a regulatory module for SNARE assembly, providing new insights into calcium-triggered membrane fusion.     

Sly1 protein bound to Golgi syntaxin Sed5p allows assembly and contributes to specificity of SNARE fusion complexes

Fusion of transport vesicles with their target organelles involves specific membrane proteins, SNAREs, which form tight complexes bridging the membranes to be fused. Evidence from yeast and mammals indicates that Sec1 family proteins act as regulators of membrane fusion by binding to the target membrane SNAREs. In experiments with purified proteins, we now made the observation that the ER to Golgi core SNARE fusion complex could be assembled on syntaxin Sed5p tightly bound to the Sec1-related Sly1p. Sly1p also bound to preassembled SNARE complexes in vitro and was found to be part of a vesicular/target membrane SNARE complex immunoprecipitated from yeast cell lysates. This is in marked contrast to the exocytic SNARE assembly in neuronal cells where high affinity binding of N-Sec1/Munc-18 to syntaxin 1A precluded core SNARE fusion complex formation. We also found that the kinetics of SNARE complex formation in vitro with either Sly1p-bound or free Sed5p was not significantly different. Importantly, several presumably nonphysiological SNARE complexes easily generated with Sed5p did not form when the syntaxin was first bound to Sly1p. This indicates for the first time that a Sec1 family member contributes to the specificity of SNARE complex assembly.     

Sec22p export from the endoplasmic reticulum is independent of SNARE pairing

Molecularly distinct sets of SNARE proteins localize to specific intracellular compartments and catalyze membrane fusion events. Although their central role in membrane fusion is appreciated, little is known about the mechanisms by which individual SNARE proteins are targeted to specific organelles. Here we investigated functional domains in Sec22p that direct this SNARE protein to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), to Golgi membranes, and into SNARE complexes with Bet1p, Bos1p, and Sed5p. A series of Sec22p deletion mutants were monitored in COPII budding assays, subcellular fractionation gradients, and SNARE complex immunoprecipitations. We found that the N-terminal "profilin-like" domain of Sec22p was required but not sufficient for COPII-dependent export of Sec22p from the ER. Interestingly, versions of Sec22p that lacked the N-terminal domain were assembled into ER/Golgi SNARE complexes. Analyses of Sec22p SNARE domain mutants revealed a second signal within the SNARE motif (between layers -4 and -1) that was required for efficient ER export. Other SNARE domain mutants that contained this signal were efficiently packaged into COPII vesicles but failed to assemble into SNARE complexes. Together these results indicated that SNARE complex formation is neither required nor sufficient for Sec22p packaging into COPII transport vesicles and subsequent targeting to the Golgi complex. We propose that the COPII budding machinery has a preference for unassembled ER/Golgi SNARE proteins.     

Is Assembly of the SNARE Complex Enough to Fuel Membrane Fusion?

The three key players in the exocytotic release of neurotransmitters from synaptic vesicles are the SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins synaptobrevin 2, syntaxin 1a, and SNAP-25. Their assembly into a tight four-helix bundle complex is thought to pull the two membranes into close proximity. It is debated, however, whether the energy generated suffices for membrane fusion. Here, we have determined the thermodynamic properties of the individual SNARE assembly steps by isothermal titration calorimetry. We found extremely large favorable enthalpy changes counterbalanced by positive entropy changes, reflecting the major conformational changes upon assembly. To circumvent the fact that ternary complex formation is essentially irreversible, we used a stabilized syntaxin-SNAP-25 heterodimer to study synaptobrevin binding. This strategy revealed that the N-terminal synaptobrevin coil binds reversibly with nanomolar affinity. This suggests that individual, membrane-bridging SNARE complexes can provide much less pulling force than previously claimed.The molecular machinery that drives the Ca²⁺-dependent release of neurotransmitters from synaptic vesicles is studied intensively. Three key players in the underlying exocytotic fusion of the vesicle with the plasma membrane are the proteins synaptobrevin 2/VAMP2 (vesicle-associated membrane protein), syntaxin 1a, and SNAP-25³ (for review, see Refs. 1-7). They belong to the so-called SNARE protein family, the members of which are involved in all vesicle fusion steps in the endocytic and secretory pathway. In general, SNARE proteins are relatively small, tail-anchored membrane proteins. Their key characteristic is the so-called SNARE motif, an extended stretch of heptad repeats that is usually connected to a single transmembrane domain by a short linker. Syntaxin and synaptobrevin each contain a single SNARE motif, whereas SNAP-25 contains two SNARE motifs connected by a palmitoylated linker region serving as a membrane anchor. The SNARE motifs of the three proteins assemble into a very tight four-helix bundle between opposing membranes; during this process the plasma membrane proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25 provide the binding site for the vesicular synaptobrevin. Formation of this complex is accompanied by extensive structural rearrangements (8-10). Based on these findings, it was put forward that the formation of the SNARE bundle provides the energy that drives membrane fusion. As the bundle is oriented in parallel, it is thought that formation of this complex starts from the membrane-proximal N termini and proceeds toward the C-terminal membrane anchors, effectively pulling the membranes together (the “zipper” model) (11). Although the zipper scenario is intuitive, it has been difficult to demonstrate directly.A decade ago it was shown that the three neuronal SNARE proteins are sufficient to fuse artificial vesicles (12). However, this reductionist approach yields rather slow fusion rates (12-14). Over the years various different end products of SNARE catalysis (complete fusion, hemifusion, and only tethered membranes) have been reported (15-19). These unsatisfactory results have fueled the debate over whether the assembly process indeed provides enough impetus to fuse bilayers. Not surprisingly, an alternative scenario has been put forward in which repulsive forces between membranes bring the SNARE assembly to a grinding halt. According to this idea, other factors like the Ca²⁺ sensor synaptotagmin or the small soluble protein complexin are needed to induce membrane merging (20-22).In simple terms, to find out whether the SNARE complex assembly is enough for membrane fusion, only the amount of energy released during complex formation and the amount of energy needed for membrane fusion need to be compared. However, the physics of membrane fusion are very complicated, and it is even more challenging to understand how proteins modulate the process. The free energy for bilayer fusion in an aqueous environment is not very high, but fusion is thought to require a large activation energy of about 40 k_BT, as two charged membranes have to be brought into close apposition. According to a theoretical model, the apposing membranes then need to be modified into a stalk-like configuration. Before fusion occurs, the process is thought to pass through a hemifusion intermediate in which only the outer monolayers are merged (for review, see Refs. 23 and 24). The role of fusion proteins is thought to lower the energy barrier for membrane fusion, but understanding how they modulate the lipid membrane and how their conformational changes are translated into a mechanical force is still in its infancy. It is not clear, for instance, whether SNARE-catalyzed fusion indeed proceeds through a stalk-like structure or just locally alters the membranes, a mechanism that might need much less activation energy.As the folding and unfolding transitions of the ternary SNARE complex exhibit a marked hysteresis (25), the question of how much energy is released during complex formation has been difficult to answer as well. To avoid the quasi-irreversibility of the process, the problem has been elegantly tackled by atomic force microscopy by two different research groups (26-28). In these experiments individual complexes affixed to solid supports were ruptured, yielding energy values of 43 and 33 k_BT. In another approach, which used a surface-force apparatus (SFA), a comparable energy of 35 k_BT has recently been determined (29). Strikingly, these values appear to correspond closely with the activation energy needed to fuse two membranes, substantiating the view that SNAREs are nano-fusion machineries. However, one should be cautious about the conclusion that these sophisticated procedures in fact yield the genuine SNARE assembly energy. For example, with the SFA approach, the number of complexes had to be deduced rather indirectly to estimate the free energy. Moreover, these approaches offered only indirect information about the reaction pathway.In this study we set out to determine the SNARE assembly energy more directly by using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) complemented by kinetic measurements. ITC is a powerful technique for studying the thermodynamics of macromolecular interactions by directly measuring the heat changes associated with complex formation, which at constant pressure is equal to the enthalpy change (ΔH). The titration approach also yields the stoichiometry (n), the entropy change (ΔS), and the association constant (K_A) of the reaction. We studied the consecutive reaction steps individually to gain deeper insights into the rugged energy landscape of complex formation. To study synaptobrevin binding in isolation, we used a stabilized syntaxin-SNAP-25 heterodimer, which has been shown to greatly accelerate liposome fusion rates (30). This strategy revealed that the N-terminal coil of synaptobrevin binds reversibly, making it feasible to access the free energy of SNARE assembly. Overall, our results suggest that individual SNARE complexes might provide much less pulling energy than previously claimed.     

Phosphorylation of residues inside the SNARE complex suppresses secretory vesicle fusion

Membrane fusion is essential for eukaryotic life, requiring SNARE proteins to zipper up in an α‐helical bundle to pull two membranes together. Here, we show that vesicle fusion can be suppressed by phosphorylation of core conserved residues inside the SNARE domain. We took a proteomics approach using a PKCB knockout mast cell model and found that the key mast cell secretory protein VAMP8 becomes phosphorylated by PKC at multiple residues in the SNARE domain. Our data suggest that VAMP8 phosphorylation reduces vesicle fusion in vitro and suppresses secretion in living cells, allowing vesicles to dock but preventing fusion with the plasma membrane. Markedly, we show that the phosphorylation motif is absent in all eukaryotic neuronal VAMPs, but present in all other VAMPs. Thus, phosphorylation of SNARE domains is a general mechanism to restrict how much cells secrete, opening the door for new therapeutic strategies for suppression of secretion.     

Differential roles of syntaxin 7 and syntaxin 8 in endosomal trafficking

To understand molecular mechanisms that regulate the intricate and dynamic organization of the endosomal compartment, it is important to establish the morphology, molecular composition, and functions of the different organelles involved in endosomal trafficking. Syntaxins and vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) families, also known as soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), have been implicated in mediating membrane fusion and may play a role in determining the specificity of vesicular trafficking. Although several SNAREs, including VAMP3/cellubrevin, VAMP8/endobrevin, syntaxin 13, and syntaxin 7, have been localized to the endosomal membranes, their precise localization, biochemical interactions, and function remain unclear. Furthermore, little is known about SNAREs involved in lysosomal trafficking. So far, only one SNARE, VAMP7, has been localized to late endosomes (LEs), where it is proposed to mediate trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor to LEs and lysosomes. Here we characterize the localization and function of two additional endosomal syntaxins, syntaxins 7 and 8, and propose that they mediate distinct steps of endosomal protein trafficking. Both syntaxins are found in SNARE complexes that are dissociated by alpha-soluble NSF attachment protein and NSF. Syntaxin 7 is mainly localized to vacuolar early endosomes (EEs) and may be involved in protein trafficking from the plasma membrane to the EE as well as in homotypic fusion of endocytic organelles. In contrast, syntaxin 8 is likely to function in clathrin-independent vesicular transport and membrane fusion events necessary for protein transport from EEs to LEs.     

A SNARE complex unique to seed plants is required for protein storage vacuole biogenesis and seed development of Arabidopsis thaliana

The SNARE complex is a key regulator of vesicular traffic, executing membrane fusion between transport vesicles or organelles and target membranes. A functional SNARE complex consists of four coiled-coil helical bundles, three of which are supplied by Q-SNAREs and another from an R-SNARE. Arabidopsis thaliana VAMP727 is an R-SNARE, with homologs only in seed plants. We have found that VAMP727 colocalizes with SYP22/ VAM3, a Q-SNARE, on a subpopulation of prevacuolar compartments/endosomes closely associated with the vacuolar membrane. Genetic and biochemical analyses, including examination of a synergistic interaction of vamp727 and syp22 mutations, histological examination of protein localization, and coimmunoprecipitation from Arabidopsis lysates indicate that VAMP727 forms a complex with SYP22, VTI11, and SYP51 and that this complex plays a crucial role in vacuolar transport, seed maturation, and vacuole biogenesis. We suggest that the VAMP727 complex mediates the membrane fusion between the prevacuolar compartment and the vacuole and that this process has evolved as an essential step for seed development.     

SNARE Complex Zipping as a Driving Force in the Dilation of Proteinaceous Fusion Pores

The assembly of SNARE proteins into a tight complex has been hypothesized to drive membrane fusion. A model of the initial fusion pore as a proteinaceous channel formed by SNARE proteins places their membrane anchors in separate membranes. This leaves the possibility of a final assembly step that brings the membrane anchors together and drives fusion pore expansion. The present study develops a model for expansion in which the final SNARE complex zipping step drives a transition from a proteinaceous fusion pore to a lipidic fusion pore. An estimate of the energy released upon merger of the helical segments of the SNARE motifs with the helical segments of the membrane anchors indicates that completing the assembly of a few SNARE complexes can overcome the elastic energy that opposes lipid bilayer deformation into a narrow fusion pore. The angle between the helical axes of the membrane anchor and SNARE motif serves as a useful reaction coordinate for this transition. Energy was calculated as a function of this angle, incorporating contributions from membrane bending, SNARE complex assembly, membrane anchor flexing and hydrophobic interactions. The rate of this transition was evaluated as a process of diffusion over the barrier imposed by these combined energies, and the rates estimated were consistent with experimental measurements.     

The syntaxins

Summary  

The SNARE hypothesis predicts that a family of SNAP receptors are localized to and function in diverse intracellular membrane compartments where membrane fusion processes take place. Syntaxins, the prototype family of SNARE proteins, have a carboxy-terminal tail-anchor and multiple coiled-coil domains. There are 15 members of the syntaxin family in the human genome and 7 syntaxin-like genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In conjunction with other SNAREs and with the cytoplasmic NSF and SNAP proteins, syntaxins mediate vesicle fusion in diverse vesicular transport processes along the exocytic and the endocytic pathway. They are crucial components that both drive and provide specificity to the myriad vesicular fusion processes that characterize the eukaryotic cell.