Replication control in plasmid R1: duplex formation between the antisense RNA, CopA, and its target, CopT, is not required for inhibition of RepA synthesis.

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is regulated by an antisense RNA, CopA, which inhibits the synthesis of the rate-limiting initiator protein RepA. The inhibition requires an interaction between the antisense RNA and its target, CopT, in the leader of the RepA mRNA. This binding reaction has previously been studied in vitro, and the formation of a complete RNA duplex between the two RNAs has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. Here we investigate whether complete duplex formation is required for CopA-mediated inhibition in vivo. A mutated copA gene was constructed, encoding a truncated CopA which is impaired in its ability to form a complete CopA/CopT duplex, but which forms a primary binding intermediate (the 'kissing complex'). The mutated CopA species (S-CopA) mediated incompatibility against wild-type R1 plasmids and inhibited RepA-LacZ fusion protein synthesis. Northern blot, primer extension and S1 analyses indicated that S-CopA did not form a complete duplex with CopT in vivo since bands corresponding to RNase III cleavage products were missing. An in vitro analysis supported the same conclusion. These data suggest that formation of the 'kissing complex' suffices to inhibit RepA synthesis, and that complete CopA/CopT duplex formation is not required. The implications of these findings are discussed.     

Characterizing the structural features of RNA/RNA interactions of the F-plasmid FinOP fertility inhibition system

F-like plasmid transfer is mediated by the FinOP fertility inhibition system. Expression of the F positive regulatory protein, TraJ, is controlled by the action of the antisense RNA, FinP, and the RNA-binding protein FinO. FinO binds to and protects FinP from degradation and promotes duplex formation between FinP and traJ mRNA, leading to repression of both traJ expression and conjugative F transfer. FinP antisense RNA secondary structure is composed of two stem-loops separated by a 4-base single-stranded spacer and flanked on each side by single-stranded tails. Here we show that disruption of the expected Watson-Crick base pairing between the loops of FinP stem-loop I and its cognate RNA binding partner, traJ mRNA stem-loop Ic, led to a moderate reduction in the rate of duplex formation in vitro. In vivo, alterations of the anti-ribosome binding site region in the loop of FinP stem-loop I reduced the ability of the mutant FinP to mediate fertility inhibition and to inhibit TraJ expression when expressed in trans at an elevated copy number. Alterations of intermolecular complementarity between the stems of these RNAs reduced the rate of duplex formation. Our results suggest that successful interaction between stem-loop I of FinP and stem-loop Ic of traJ mRNA requires that base pairing must proceed from an initial loop-loop interaction through the top portion of the stems for stable duplex formation to occur.     

Antisense RNA inhibits splicing of pre-mRNA in vitro.

Antisense RNAs complementary to human beta-globin pre-mRNA or to a chimeric globin/adenovirus E2a pre-mRNA specifically and efficiently inhibit pre-mRNA splicing in vitro. The level of inhibition depends on the length, position and concentration of the antisense RNA relative to the pre-mRNA substrate. Antisense RNAs complementary to sequences greater than 80 nucleotides downstream of the globin 3' splice site inhibit at least as efficiently as those extending across the splice sites. Thus splicing is sensitive to perturbations involving exon sequences some distance from the splice sites. Inhibition is mediated by factors which affect the annealing of antisense and substrate RNAs. Direct analysis of RNA duplex formation demonstrates the presence of an activity in HeLa cell nuclear extract which promotes the rapid annealing of complementary RNAs in an ATP-independent manner. Both annealing and inhibition are greatly reduced when antisense RNA is added to the splicing reaction greater than or equal to 5 min after substrate. This result may reflect a transition between an open structure, in which annealing of antisense RNA with pre-mRNA is facilitated, and a closed complex in which pre-mRNA is sequestered at an early stage of spliceosome assembly.     

Inhibition of flower pigmentation by antisense CHS genes: promoter and minimal sequence requirements for the antisense effect

Introduction of a constitutive antisense full-length chalcone synthase (CHS) cDNA gene in petunia can result in an inhibition of flower pigmentation. We have evaluated some of the factors which may be important for the effectiveness of an antisense CHS gene.Antisense CHS genes encoding half-length or quarter-length RNA complementary to the 3 half of CHS mRNA are able to affect flower pigmentation, while a gene encoding RNA complementary to the 5 half of CHS mRNA did not show phenotypic effects in transgenic petunia plants. We demonstrate that the RNA encoded by the latter gene has a much lower average steady-state level in leaf tissue than the RNAs encoded by the other antisense gene constructs. We have compared the CaMV 35S and endogenous CHS promoter strengths and intrinsic stabilities of sense and antisense CHS RNAs. From the data we conclude that the constitutive antisense CHS genes are not likely to provide an excess of antisense RNA compared to the CHS mRNA derived from the endogenous genes.Effective inhibition of flower pigmentation is also observed when the antisense CHS gene is under control of the homologous CHS promoter. The results indicate that the mechanism of antisense inhibition cannot solely operate via RNA duplex formation between sense and antisense RNA.     

A two unit antisense RNA cassette test system for silencing of target genes.

This communication describes a two unit antisense RNA cassette system for use in gene silencing. Cassettes consist of a recognition unit and an inhibitory unit which are transcribed into a single RNA that carries sequences of non-contiguous complementarity to the chosen target RNA. The recognition unit is designed as a stem-loop for rapid formation of long- lived binding intermediates with target sequences and resembles the major stem-loop of a naturally occurring antisense RNA, CopA. The inhibitory unit consists of either a sequence complementary to a ribosome binding site or of a hairpin ribozyme targeted at a site within the chosen mRNA. The contributions of the individual units to inhibition was assessed using the lacI gene as a target. All possible combinations of recognition and inhibitory units were tested in either orientation. In general, inhibition of lacI expression was relatively low. Fifty per cent inhibition was obtained with the most effective of the constructs, carrying the recognition stem-loop in the antisense orientation and the inhibitory unit with an anti-RBS sequence. Several experiments were performed to assess activities of the RNAs in vitro and in vivo : antisense RNA binding assays, cleavage assays, secondary structure analysis as well as Northern blotting and primer extension analysis of antisense and target RNAs. The problems associated with this antisense RNA approach as well as its potential are discussed with respect to possible optimization strategies.     

An antisense/target RNA duplex or a strong intramolecular RNA structure 5' of a translation initiation signal blocks ribosome binding: the case of plasmid R1.

Antisense RNAs in prokaryotic systems often inhibit translation of mRNAs. In some cases, this involves sequestration of Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequences and start codons. In other cases, antisense/target RNA duplexes do not overlap these signals, but form upstream. We have performed toeprinting analyses on repA mRNA of plasmid R1, both free and in duplex with the antisense RNA, CopA. An intermolecular RNA duplex 2 nt upstream of the tap SD prevents ribosome binding. An intrastrand stem-loop at this location yields the same inhibition. Thus, stable secondary structures immediately upstream of the tap SD sequence inhibit translation, as shown by toeprinting in vitro and repA-lacZ expression in vivo. Previous work showed that repA (initiator protein) expression requires tap (leader peptide) translation. Toeprinting data confirm that the tap ribosome binding site (RBS) is accessible, whereas the repA RBS, which is sequestered by a stable stem-loop, is weakly recognized by the ribosome. Truncated CopA RNA (CopI) is unable to pair completely with target RNA, but proceeds normally to a kissing intermediate. This mutant RNA species inhibits repA expression in vivo. By a kinetic toeprint inhibition protocol, we have shown that the structure of the kissing complex is sufficient to sterically prevent ribosome binding. These results are discussed in comparison with the effect of RNA structures elsewhere in the ribosome-binding region of an mRNA.     

Inhibition of pre-mRNA splicing by antisense RNA in vitro: effect of RNA containing sequences complementary to exons.

The objective of the experiments described in this paper was to determine the feasibility of inhibition of pre-mRNA splicing by antisense RNA in vitro. Three different types of antisense RNA were utilized: antisense RNA complementary to the spliced RNA molecule; antisense RNA complementary to the unprocessed mRNA precursor molecule; and antisense RNA complementary to the 5' and 3' splice junctions. Whereas antisense RNA complementary to mRNA had little effect on splicing, antisense RNAs complementary to mRNA precursor or to splice junctions strongly inhibited splicing of pre-mRNA molecule. The results obtained indicate that the inhibitory effect is most likely due to hybrid formation between pre-mRNA and antisense RNA molecules and that antisense RNA complementary to the exon portion but not to the intron portion of splice junction exhibit an inhibitory effect. This inhibition can be overcome by bringing together 5' and 3' splice junctions via hybrid formation with antisense RNA complementary to the spliced RNA molecule.     

Masked antisense: a molecular configuration for discriminating similar RNA targets

Antisense technology has great potential for the control of RNA expression, but there remain few successful applications of the technology. Expressed antisense RNA can effectively down-regulate expression of a gene over long periods, but cannot differentiate partly identical sequences, such as the mRNA of fusion genes or those with point mutants. We have designed a structured form of expressed antisense, which can discriminate between highly similar mRNA molecules. These ‘masked’ antisense RNAs have most of the antisense sequence sequestered within duplex elements, leaving a short single-stranded region to initiate binding to target RNA. After contacting the correct target, the structured RNA can unravel, releasing the masked antisense region to form a stable duplex with the mRNA. We demonstrate that suitable masked antisense RNA can discriminate between the two forms of BCR–ABL mRNA that result from the Philadelphia chromosomal translocations, as well as discriminating the normal BCR and ABL mRNA.     

Functional anatomy of a dsRNA trigger: differential requirement for the two trigger strands in RNA interference

In RNA-mediated interference (RNAi), externally provided mixtures of sense and antisense RNA trigger concerted degradation of homologous cellular RNAs. We show that RNAi requires duplex formation between the two trigger strands, that the duplex must include a region of identity between trigger and target RNAs, and that duplexes as short as 26 bp can trigger RNAi. Consistent with in vitro observations, a fraction of input dsRNA is converted in vivo to short segments of approximately 25 nt. Interference assays with modified dsRNAs indicate precise chemical requirements for both bases and backbone of the RNA trigger. Strikingly, certain modifications are well tolerated on the sense, but not the antisense, strand, indicating that the two trigger strands have distinct roles in the interference process.     

Recognition of duplex DNA by RNA polynucleotides.

We are interested in creating artificial gene repressors based on duplex DNA recognition by nucleic acids. Homopyrimidine RNA oligonucleotides bind to duplex DNA at homopurine/homopyrimidine sequences under slightly acidic conditions. Recognition is sequence-specific, involving rU.dA.dT and rC+.dG.dC base triplets. Affinities were determined for folded polymeric RNAs (ca. 100-200 nt) containing 0, 1 or 3 copies of a 21 nt RNA sequence that binds duplex DNA by triple helix formation. When this recognition sequence was inserted into the larger folded RNAs, micromolar concentrations of the resulting RNA ligands bound a duplex DNA target at pH 5. However, these binding affinities were at least 20-fold lower than the affinity of an RNA oligonucleotide containing only the recognition sequence. Enzymatic probing of folded RNAs suggests that reduced affinity arises from unfavorable electrostatic, structural and topological considerations. The affinity of a polymeric RNA with three copies of the recognition sequence was greater than that of a polymeric RNA with a single copy of the sequence. This affinity difference ranged from 2.6- to 13-fold, depending on pH. Binding of duplex DNA by polymeric RNA might be improved by optimizing the RNA structure to efficiently present the recognition sequence.     

RNA aptamers binding the double-stranded RNA-binding domain

Specific RNA recognition of proteins containing the double-strand RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) is essential for several biological pathways such as ADAR-mediated adenosine deamination, localization of RNAs by Staufen, or RNA cleavage by RNAse III. Structural analysis has demonstrated the lack of base-specific interactions of dsRBDs with either a perfect RNA duplex or an RNA hairpin. We therefore asked whether in vitro selections performed in parallel with individual dsRBDs could yield RNAs that are specifically recognized by the dsRBD on which they were selected . To this end, SELEX experiments were performed using either the second dsRBD of the RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 or the second dsRBD of Xlrbpa, a homolog of TRBP that is involved in RISC formation. Several RNA families with high binding capacities for dsRBDs were isolated from either SELEX experiment, but no discrimination of these RNAs by different dsRBDs could be detected. The selected RNAs are highly structured, and binding regions map to two neighboring stem-loops that presumably form stacked helices and are interrupted by mismatches and bulges. Despite the lack of selective binding of SELEX RNAs to individual dsRBDS, selected RNAs can efficiently interfere with RNA editing in vivo.     

Four-way junctions in antisense RNA-mRNA complexes involved in plasmid replication control: a common theme?

In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. In plasmid R1, we have recently shown that the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by the formation of two intermolecular helices, resulting in a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. Based on lead-induced cleavage and ribonuclease (RNase) V(1) probing combined with molecular modeling, a strikingly similar topology is supported for the complex formed between the antisense RNA (Inc) and mRNA (RepZ) of plasmid Col1b-P9. In particular, the position of the four-way junction and the location of divalent ion-binding site(s) indicate that the structural features of these two complexes are essentially the same in spite of sequence differences. Comparisons of several target and antisense RNAs in other plasmids further indicate that similar binding pathways are used to form the inhibitory antisense-target RNA complexes. Thus, in all these systems, the structural features of both antisense and target RNAs determine the topologically possible and kinetically favored pathway that is essential for efficient in vivo control.     

Control of replication of plasmid R1: formation of an initial transient complex is rate-limiting for antisense RNA--target RNA pairing.

The replication frequency of plasmid R1 is determined by the availability of the initiator protein RepA. Synthesis of RepA is negatively controlled by an antisense RNA, CopA, which forms a duplex with the upstream region of the RepA mRNA, CopT. We have previously shown that the in vitro formation of the CopA-CopT duplex follows second-order kinetics and occurs in at least two steps. The first step is the formation of a transient (kissing) complex, which is subsequently converted to a persistent duplex. Here, we investigate the details of the reaction scheme and determine the rate constants of the pathway from the free RNAs to the complete duplex. Using a shortened CopA RNA (CopI) we have been able to determine the association and dissociation rate constants (k1,k-1) for the kissing complex (which are inferred to be the same for CopI-T and CopA-T), and measured the hybridization rate constant k2 (for CopA-T k2 is at least 1000-fold greater than for CopI-T). The analysis of CopA derivatives of mutant and wild-type origin shows that the rate of formation of the kissing complex is rate-limiting for the overall pairing reaction between CopA and CopT, both in vitro and in vivo. The biological implications of the kinetically irreversible RNA-RNA binding reaction scheme are discussed.     

Bulged residues promote the progression of a loop-loop interaction to a stable and inhibitory antisense-target RNA complex

In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. These RNAs are characterized by a long hairpin structure interrupted by several unpaired residues or bulged loops. In plasmid R1, the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. This topology facilitates the formation of a stabilizer intermolecular helix between distal regions of both RNAs, essential for in vivo control. The bulged residues in CopA/CopT were shown to be required for high in vitro binding rate and in vivo activity. This study addresses the question of why removal of bulged nucleotides blocks stable complex formation. Structure mapping, modification interference, and molecular modeling of bulged-less mutant CopA–CopT complexes suggests that, subsequent to loop–loop contact, helix propagation is prevented. Instead, a fully base paired loop–loop interaction is formed, inducing a continuous stacking of three helices. Consequently, the stabilizer helix cannot be formed, and stable complex formation is blocked. In contrast to the four-way junction topology, the loop–loop interaction alone failed to prevent ribosome binding at its loading site and, thus, inhibition of RepA translation was alleviated.     

Poly-2'-DNP-RNAs with enhanced efficacy for inhibiting cancer cell growth

It is often believed that small interfering RNA (siRNA) is at least 10-fold more effective than the single-stranded antisense oligonucleotide for silencing the same target gene in the same cells. In view of the recent discovery that the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) contains only a single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) molecule and can be reconstituted using single-stranded antisense RNA, such a large difference in efficacy seems puzzling. One possible reason is that hybridization protects siRNA from hydrolysis by endogenous RNase activity until it is incorporated in the RISC, whereas ssRNA is rapidly hydrolyzed. Because the single-stranded poly-2'-O-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-RNA (DNP-ssRNA) is both RNase resistant and membrane permeable, we synthesized homologous native siRNAs, DNP-siRNAs, native ssRNAs, and DNP-ssRNAs and made a comparative study of their efficacies for inhibiting the growth of two cancer cell lines with different overexpressed target genes under equivalent experimental conditions. It was found that the efficacy of antisense DNP-ssRNA is higher than that of the corresponding siRNA and that the efficacy of native siRNA for inhibiting cell growth can also be enhanced from 2-fold to 6-fold by replacing the native strands of RNA in siRNA with homologous DNP-RNA. Thermal denaturation data show that the hybridization affinity of the DNP-RNA/RNA duplex is higher than that of the native RNA/RNA duplex. Western blotting analysis of A549 cells treated with antisense DNP-ssRNAs containing single mismatching bases shows that the gene silencing by antisense DNP-ssRNA is as sequence specific as that by siRNA. The observed large enhancement of inhibition efficacy of native RNAs by DNP derivatization should be advantageous for both gene silencing studies and therapeutic applications.