Conformational isomerization in phage Mu transpososome assembly: effects of the transpositional enhancer and of MuB.

Initiation of phage Mu DNA transposition requires assembly of higher order protein-DNA complexes called Mu transpososomes containing the two Mu DNA ends and MuA transposase tetramer. Mu transpososome assembly is highly regulated and involves multiple DNA sites for transposase binding, including a transpositional enhancer called the internal activation sequence (IAS). In addition, a number of protein cofactors participate, including the target DNA activator MuB ATPase. We investigated the impact of the assembly cofactors on the kinetics of transpososome assembly with the aim of deciphering the reaction steps that are influenced by the cofactors. The transpositional enhancer IAS appears to have little impact on the initial pairing of the two Mu end segments bound by MuA. Instead, it accelerates the post-synaptic conformational step(s) that converts the reversible complex to the stable transpososome. The transpososome assembly stimulation by MuB does not require its stable DNA binding activity, which appears critical for directing transposition to sites distant from the donor transposon.     

Tn10 transpososome assembly involves a folded intermediate that must be unfolded for target capture and strand transfer

Tn10 transposition, like all transposition reactions examined thus far, involves assembly of a stable protein-DNA transpososome, containing a pair of transposon ends, within which all chemical events occur. We report here that stable Tn10 pre-cleavage transpososomes occur in two conformations: a folded form which contains the DNA-bending factor IHF and an unfolded form which lacks IHF. Functional analysis shows that both forms undergo double strand cleavage at the transposon ends but that only the unfolded form is competent for target capture (and thus for strand transfer to target DNA). Additional studies reveal that formation of any type of stable transpososome, folded or unfolded, requires not only IHF but also non-specific transposase-DNA contacts immediately internal to the IHF-binding site, implying the occurrence of a topo- logically closed loop at the transposon end. Overall, transpososome assembly must proceed via a folded intermediate which, however, must be unfolded in order for intermolecular transposition to occur. These and other results support key features of a recently proposed model for transpososome assembly and morphogenesis.     

Mini-Mu mediates deletion-inversions in vivo by intra-transposon transposition

We have shown that a mini-Mu can transpose into itself in vivo to generate a circle containing only transposon sequences. This deletion-inversion product, which has previously been observed in vitro, is formed by non-replicative transposition and has directly repeated Mu ends. It therefore cannot undergo further rounds of transposition and retains the two copies of the target sequence duplicated in the event. Thus we have been able to confirm that a mini-Mu can undergo non-replicative reactions in vivo and that these generate a 5 bp target site duplication, as has been shown to occur following replicative transposition and lysogenization with Mu.     

IS10/Tn10 transposition efficiently accommodates diverse transposon end configurations.

Transposon Tn10 and its component insertion sequence IS10 move by non-replicative transposition. We have studied the array of reaction intermediates and products in a high efficiency in vitro IS10/Tn10 transposition reaction. Synapsis of two transposon ends, followed by cleavage and strand transfer, can occur very efficiently irrespective of the relative locations and orientations of the two ends. The two participating ends can occur in inverted or direct orientation on the same molecule or, most importantly, on two different molecules. This behavior contrasts sharply with that of Mu, in which transposition is strongly biased in favor of inverted repeat synapsis. Mechanistically, the absence of discrimination amongst various end configurations implies that the architecture within the IS10/Tn10 synaptic complex is relatively simple, i.e. lacking any significant intertwining of component DNA strands. Biologically these observations are important because they suggest that the IS10 insertion sequence module has considerable flexibility in the types of DNA rearrangements that it can promote. Most importantly, it now seems highly probable that a single non-replicative IS10 element can promote DNA rearrangements usually attributed to replicative transposition, i.e. adjacent deletions and cointegrates, by utilizing transposon ends on two sister chromosomes. Other events which probably also contribute to the diversity of IS10/Tn10-promoted rearrangements are discussed.     

DNA recognition sites activate MuA transposase to perform transposition of non-Mu DNA.

Mu transposition occurs within a large protein-DNA complex called a transpososome. This stable complex includes four subunits of MuA transposase, each contacting a 22-base pair recognition site located near an end of the transposon DNA. These MuA recognition sites are critical for assembling the transpososome. Here we report that when concentrations of Mu DNA are limited, the MuA recognition sites permit assembly of transpososomes in which non-Mu DNA substitutes for some of the Mu sequences. These "hybrid" transpososomes are stable to competitor DNA, actively transpose the non-Mu DNA, and produce transposition products that had been previously observed but not explained. The strongest activator of non-Mu transposition is a DNA fragment containing two MuA recognition sites and no cleavage site, but a shorter fragment with just one recognition site is sufficient. Based on our results, we propose that MuA recognition sites drive assembly of functional transpososomes in two complementary ways. Multiple recognition sites help physically position MuA subunits in the transpososome plus each individual site allosterically activates transposase.     

The transpososome: control of transposition at the level of catalysis

Studies of several transposable genetic elements have pinpointed the importance of the transpososome, a nucleoprotein complex involving the transposon ends and a transposon-encoded enzyme--the transposase--as a key in regulating transposition. Transpososomes provide a precise architecture within which the chemical reactions involved in transposon displacement occur. Data are accumulating that suggest they are dynamic and undergo staged conformational changes to accommodate different steps in the transposition pathway. This has been underpinned by recent results obtained particularly with Tn5, Tn10 and bacteriophage Mu.     

Cyclic changes in the affinity of protein-DNA interactions drive the progression and regulate the outcome of the Tn10 transposition reaction

The Tn10 transpososome is a DNA processing machine in which two transposon ends, a transposase dimer and the host protein integration host factor (IHF), are united in an asymmetrical complex. The transitions that occur during one transposition cycle are not limited to chemical cleavage events at the transposon ends, but also involve a reorganization of the protein and DNA components. Here, we demonstrate multiple pathways for Tn10 transposition. We show that one series of events is favored over all others and involves cyclic changes in the affinity of IHF for its binding site. During transpososome assembly, IHF is bound with high affinity. However, the affinity for IHF drops dramatically after cleavage of the first transposon end, leading to IHF ejection and unfolding of the complex. The ejection of IHF promotes cleavage of the second end, which is followed by restoration of the high affinity state which in turn regulates target interactions.     

Host factors that promote transpososome disassembly and the PriA-PriC pathway for restart primosome assembly

Initiation of bacteriophage Mu DNA replication by transposition requires the disassembly of the transpososome that catalyses strand exchange and the assembly of a replisome promoted by PriA, PriB, PriC and DnaT proteins, which function in the host to restart stalled replication forks. Once the molecular chaperone ClpX weakens the very tight binding of the transpososome to the Mu ends, host disassembly factors (MRFalpha-DF) promote the dissociation of the transpososome from the DNA template and the assembly of a new nucleoprotein complex. Prereplisome factors (MRFalpha-PR) further alter the complex, allowing PriA binding and loading of major replicative helicase DnaB onto the template promoted by the restart proteins. MRFalpha-PR is essential for DnaB loading by restart proteins even on the deproteinized Mu fork whereas MRFalpha-DF is not required on the deproteinized template. When the transition from transpososome to replisome was reconstituted using MRFalpha-DF and MRFalpha-PR, initiation of Mu DNA replication was strictly dependent upon added PriC and PriA helicase. In contrast, initiation on the deproteinized template was predominantly dependent upon PriB and did not require PriA's helicase activity. The results indicate that transition mechanisms beginning with the transpososome disassembly can determine the pathway of replisome assembly by restart proteins.     

Progressive structural transitions within Mu transpositional complexes

Assembly of the Mu transpososome is dependent on specific binding sites for the MuA transposase near the ends of the phage genome. MuA also contacts terminal nucleotides but only upon transpososome assembly, and base-specific recognition of the terminal nucleotides is critical for assembly. We show that Mu ends lacking the terminal 5 bp can form transpososomes, while longer DNA substrates with mutated terminal nucleotides cannot. The impact of the mutations can be suppressed by base mismatches near the end of Mu. Deletion of the flanking strands or mutation of the terminal nucleotides has differential effects on the cleavage and strand transfer reactions. These results show that the terminal nucleotides control the assembly and activation of transpososomes by influencing conformational changes around the active site.     

Effect of mutations in the Mu-host junction region on transpososome assembly.

Mu transposition occurs through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The region where the Mu DNA joins the host DNA plays an integral role in the assembly of these transpososomes. We have created a series of point mutations at the Mu-host junction and characterized their effect on the Mu in vitro strand transfer reaction. Analysis of these mutant constructs revealed an inhibition in transpososome assembly at the point in the reaction pathway when the junction region is engaged by the transposase active site (i.e. the transition from LER to type 0). We found that the degree of inhibition was dependent upon the particular base-pair change at each position and whether the substitution occurred at the left or right transposon end. The MuB transposition protein, an allosteric effector of MuA, was shown to suppress all of the inhibitory Mu-host junction mutants. Most of the mutant constructs were also suppressed, to varying degrees, by the substitution of Mg(2+) with Mn(2+). Analysis of the mutant constructs has revealed hierarchical nucleotide preferences at positions -1 through +3 for transpososome assembly and suggests the possibility that specific metal ion-DNA base interactions are involved in DNA recognition and transpososome assembly.     

The mu transpososome through a topological lens

Phage Mu is the most efficient transposable element known, its high efficiency being conferred by an enhancer DNA element. Transposition is the end result of a series of well choreographed steps that juxtapose the enhancer and the two Mu ends within a nucleoprotein complex called the 'transpososome.' The particular arrangement of DNA and protein components lends extraordinary stability to the transpososome and regulates the frequency, precision, directionality, and mechanism of transposition. The structure of the transpososome, therefore, holds the key to understanding all of these attributes, and ultimately to explaining the runaway genetic success of transposable elements throughout the biological world. This review focuses on the path of the DNA within the Mu transpososome, as uncovered by recent topological analyses. It discusses why Mu topology cannot be analyzed by standard methods, and how knowledge of the geometry of site alignment during Flp and Cre site-specific recombination was harnessed to design a new methodology called 'difference topology.' This methodology has also revealed the order and dynamics of association of the three interacting DNA sites, as well as the role of the enhancer in assembly of the Mu transpososome.     

DNA gyrase requirements distinguish the alternate pathways of Mu transposition

The MuA transposase mediates transposition of bacteriophage Mu through two distinct mechanisms. The first integration event following infection occurs through a non-replicative mechanism. In contrast, during lytic growth, multiple rounds of replicative transposition amplify the phage genome. We have examined the influence of gyrase and DNA supercoiling on these two transposition pathways using both a gyrase-inhibiting drug and several distinct gyrase mutants. These experiments reveal that gyrase activity is not essential for integration; both lysogens and recombination intermediates are detected when gyrase is inhibited during Mu infection. In contrast, gyrase inhibition causes severe defects in replicative transposition. In two of the mutants, as well as in drug-treated cells, replicative transposition is almost completely blocked. Experiments probing for formation of MuA-DNA complexes in vivo reveal that this block occurs very early, during assembly of the transposase complex required for the catalytic steps of recombination. The findings establish that DNA structure-based signals are used differently for integrative and replicative transposition. We propose that transposase assembly, the committed step for recombination, has evolved to depend on different DNA /architectural signals to control the reaction outcome during these two distinct phases of the phage life cycle.     

Tn10 transposase mutants with altered transpososome unfolding properties are defective in hairpin formation

Transposition reactions take place in the context of higher-order protein-DNA complexes called transpososomes. In the Tn10 transpososome, IHF binding to an "outside end" creates a bend in the DNA that allows the transposase protein to contact the end at two different sites, the terminal and subterminal binding sites. Presumably this helps to stabilize the transposase-end interaction. However, the DNA loop that is formed must be unfolded at a later stage in order for the transposon to integrate into other DNA molecules. It has been proposed that transpososome unfolding also plays a role in transposon excision. To investigate this possibility further, we have isolated and characterized transposase mutants with altered transpososome unfolding properties. Two such mutants were identified, R182A and R184A. Both mutants fail to carry out hairpin formation, an intermediate step in transposon excision, specifically with outside end-containing substrates. These results support the idea that transpososome unfolding and excision are linked. Also, based on the importance of residues R182 and R184 in transpososome unfolding, we propose a new model for the Tn10 transpososome, wherein both DNA ends of the transpososome make subterminal contacts with transposase.     

IHF-independent assembly of the Tn10 strand transfer transpososome: implications for inhibition of disintegration

The frequency of DNA transposition in transposition systems that employ a strand transfer step may be significantly affected by the occurrence of a disintegration reaction, a reaction that reverses the strand transfer event. We have asked whether disintegration occurs in the Tn10 transposition system. We show that disintegration substrates (substrates constituting one half of the strand transfer product) are assembled into a transpososome that mimics the strand transfer intermediate. This strand transfer transpososome (STT) does appear to support an intermolecular disintegration reaction, but only at a very low level. Strikingly, assembly of the STT is not dependent on IHF, a host protein that is required for de novo assembly of all previously characterized Tn10 transpososomes. We suggest that disintegration substrates are able to form both transposon end and target type contacts with transposase because of their enhanced conformational flexibility. This probably allows the conformation of DNA within the complex that prevents the destructive disintegration reaction, and is responsible for relaxing the DNA sequence requirements for STT formation relative to other Tn10 transpososomes.     

The Mu Transpososome Through a Topological Lens

ABSTRACT

Phage Mu is the most efficient transposable element known, its high efficiency being conferred by an enhancer DNA element. Transposition is the end result of a series of well choreographed steps that juxtapose the enhancer and the two Mu ends within a nucleoprotein complex called the ‘transpososome.’ The particular arrangement of DNA and protein components lends extraordinary stability to the transpososome and regulates the frequency, precision, directionality, and mechanism of transposition. The structure of the transpososome, therefore, holds the key to understanding all of these attributes, and ultimately to explaining the runaway genetic success of transposable elements throughout the biological world. This review focuses on the path of the DNA within the Mu transpososome, as uncovered by recent topological analyses. It discusses why Mu topology cannot be analyzed by standard methods, and how knowledge of the geometry of site alignment during Flp and Cre site-specific recombination was harnessed to design a new methodology called ‘difference topology.’ This methodology has also revealed the order and dynamics of association of the three interacting DNA sites, as well as the role of the enhancer in assembly of the Mu transpososome.     

Transpososome dynamics and regulation in Tn10 transposition

Tn10 is a bacterial transposon that transposes through a non-replicative mechanism. This mode of DNA transposition is widely used in bacteria and is also used by "DNA-based" transposons in eukaryotes. Tn10 has served as a paradigm for this mode of transposition and continues to provide novel insights into how steps in transposition reactions occur and how these steps are regulated. A common feature of transposition reactions is that they require the formation of a higher order protein-DNA complex called a transpososome. A major objective in the last few years has been to better understand the dynamics of transpososome assembly and progression through the course of transposition reactions. This problem is particularly interesting in the Tn10 system because two important host proteins, IHF and H-NS, have been implicated in regulating transpososome assembly and/or function. Interestingly, H-NS is an integral part of stress response pathways in bacteria, and its function is known to be sensitive to changes in environmental conditions. Consequently, H-NS may provide a means of allowing Tn10 to responed to changing environmental conditions. The current review focuses on the roles of both IHF and H-NS on Tn10 transposition.     

Mechanisms of metal ion action in Tn10 transposition

Tn10/IS10 transposition involves assembly of a synaptic complex (or transpososome) in which two transposon ends are paired, followed by four distinct chemical steps at each transposon end. The chemical steps are dependent on the presence of a suitable divalent metal cation (Me(2+)). Transpososome assembly and structure are also affected by Me(2+). To gain further insight into the mechanisms of Me(2+) action in Tn10/IS10 transposition we have investigated the effects of substituting Mn(2+) for Mg(2+), the physiologic Me(2+), in transposition. We have also investigated the significance of an Me(2+)-assisted conformational change in transpososome structure. We show that Mn(2+) has two previously unrecognized effects on the Tn10 donor cleavage reaction. It accelerates the rates of hairpin formation and hairpin resolution without significantly affecting the rate of the first chemical step, first strand nicking. Mn(2+) also relaxes the specificity of first strand nicking. We also show that Me(2+)-assisted transpososome unfolding coincides with a structural transition in the transposon-donor junction that may be necessary for hairpin formation. Possible mechanisms for these observations are considered.     

Carboxyl-terminal mutants of phage Mu transposase

A study of the properties of deletion mutants at the 3’ end ofA, the gene encoding the transposase protein of phage Mu, shows that the mutants are defective in the high-frequency non-replicative transposition observed early after Mu infection as well as the high-frequency replicative transposition observed during Mu lytic growth. They show near-normal levels of lysogenization, low frequency transposition and precise excision. The mutants behave as if they are “blind” to the presence of Mu B, a protein whose function is essential for the high frequency of both replicative and non-replicative Mudna transposition. We have sequenced these deletion mutants as well as the amber mutant A 7110 which is known to be defective in replicative transposition.A 7110 maps at the 3’ end of geneA. We suggest that the carboxyl-terminal region of the A-protein is involved in protein-protein interactions, especially with the B-protein. We also show in this study that mutations upstream of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of geneA and within the preceding genener, perturb the synthesis of A-protein and that higher levels of A-protein cause an inhibition ofA activity.