Size of vesicle pools, rates of mobilization, and recycling at neuromuscular synapses of a Drosophila mutant, shibire

Two vesicle pools, readily releasable (RRP) and reserve (RP) pools, are present at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. Using a temperature-sensitive mutant, shibire(ts), we studied pool sizes and vesicle mobilization rates. In shibire(ts), due to lack of endocytosis at nonpermissive temperatures, synaptic currents continuously declined during tetanic stimulation until they ceased as the result of vesicle depletion. By then, approximately 84,000 quanta were released. Vesicles were mobilized from RP at a rate 1/7-1/10 of RRP. Cytochalasin D inhibited mobilization of vesicles from RP, allowing us to estimate the size of RRP as 14%-19% of all vesicles. Vesicle recycling supports synaptic transmission during prolonged tetanic stimulation and the maximum recycling rate was 1000 vesicles/s.     

Role of Drosophila Rab5 during endosomal trafficking at the synapse and evoked neurotransmitter release

During constitutive endocytosis, internalized membrane traffics through endosomal compartments. At synapses, endocytosis of vesicular membrane is temporally coupled to action potential-induced exocytosis of synaptic vesicles. Endocytosed membrane may immediately be reused for a new round of neurotransmitter release without trafficking through an endosomal compartment. Using GFP-tagged endosomal markers, we monitored an endosomal compartment in Drosophila neuromuscular synapses. We showed that in conditions in which the synaptic vesicles pool is depleted, the endosome is also drastically reduced and only recovers from membrane derived by dynamin-mediated endocytosis. This suggests that membrane exchange takes place between the vesicle pool and the synaptic endosome. We demonstrate that the small GTPase Rab5 is required for endosome integrity in the presynaptic terminal. Impaired Rab5 function affects endo- and exocytosis rates and decreases the evoked neurotransmitter release probability. Conversely, Rab5 overexpression increases the release efficacy. Therefore, the Rab5-dependent trafficking pathway plays an important role for synaptic performance.     

Temperature-dependent differences between readily releasable and reserve pool vesicles in chromaffin cells

Statistical differences between amperometric traces recorded from chromaffin cells using K(+) and Ba(2+) secretagogues support the assertion that readily releasable pool (RRP) and reserve pool (RP) vesicles can be probed with pool-specific secretagogues. Release from the RRP was evoked by K(+) while release from the RP was evoked by Ba(2+). Similar temperature-dependent changes in spike area and half-width for both pools suggest that the content of RRP and RP vesicles is similar and packaged in the same way. Differences between the vesicle pools were revealed in the temperature dependence of spike frequency. While the burst spike frequency of the RRP, which is comprised of pre-docked and primed vesicles, increased 2.8% per degrees C, the RP spike frequency increased 12% per degrees C. This difference is attributed to a temperature-dependent mobilization of the RP. Furthermore, the RP exhibited more foot events at room temperature than the RRP but this difference was not apparent at 37 degrees C. This trend suggests that RP vesicle membranes have a compromised surface tension compared to RRP vesicles. Collectively, the changes of release characteristics with temperature reveal distinctions between the RRP and the RP.     

Properties of synaptic vesicle pools in mature central nerve terminals

Readily releasable and reserve pools of synaptic vesicles play different roles in neurotransmission, and it is important to understand their recycling and interchange in mature central synapses. Using adult rat cerebrocortical synaptosomes, we have shown that 100 mosm hypertonic sucrose caused complete exocytosis of only the readily releasable pool (RRP) of synaptic vesicles containing glutamate or gamma-aminobutyric acid. Repetitive hypertonic stimulations revealed that this pool recycled (and reloaded the neurotransmitter from the cytosol) fully in <30 s and did so independently of the reserve pool. Multiple rounds of exocytosis could occur in the constant absence of extracellular Ca(2+). However, although each vesicle cycle includes a Ca(2+)-independent exocytotic step, some other stage(s) critically require an elevation of cytosolic [Ca(2+)], and this is supplied by intracellular stores. Repetitive recycling also requires energy, but not the activity of phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase, which maintains the normal level of phosphoinositides. By varying the length of hypertonic stimulations, we found that approximately 70% of the RRP vesicles fused completely with the plasmalemma during exocytosis and could then enter silent pools, probably outside active zones. The rest of the RRP vesicles underwent very fast local recycling (possibly by kiss-and-run) and did not leave active zones. Forcing the fully fused RRP vesicles into the silent pool enabled us to measure the transfer of reserve vesicles to the RRP and to show that this process requires intact phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase and actin microfilaments. Our findings also demonstrate that respective vesicle pools have similar characteristics and requirements in excitatory and inhibitory nerve terminals.     

Synaptotagmin-7 controls the size of the reserve and resting pools of synaptic vesicles in hippocampal neurons

Continuous neurotransmitter release is subjected to synaptic vesicle availability, which in turn depends on vesicle recycling and the traffic of vesicles between pools. We studied the role of Synaptotagmin-7 (Syt-7) in synaptic vesicle accessibility for release in hippocampal neurons in culture. Synaptic boutons from Syt-7 knockout (KO) mice displayed normal basal secretion with no alteration in the RRP size or the probability of release. However, stronger stimuli revealed an increase in the size of the reserve and resting vesicle pools in Syt-7 KO boutons compared with WT. These data suggest that Syt-7 plays a significant role in the vesicle pool homeostasis and, consequently, in the availability of vesicles for synaptic transmission during strong stimulation, probably, by facilitating advancing synaptic vesicles to the readily releasable pool.     

Do different endocytic pathways make different synaptic vesicles?

At a wide range of synapses, synaptic vesicles reside in distinct pools that respond to different stimuli. The recycling pool supplies the vesicles required for release in response to modest stimulation, whereas the reserve pool is mobilized only by strong stimulation. Multiple pathways have been proposed for the recycling of synaptic vesicles after exocytosis, but the relationship of these pathways to the different synaptic vesicle pools has remained unclear. Synaptic vesicle proteins have also been assumed to undergo recycling as a unit. However, emerging data indicate that differences in the association with distinct endocytic adaptors such as the heterotetrameric adaptor AP3 influence the trafficking of individual synaptic vesicle proteins, affecting the composition of synaptic vesicles and hence their functional characteristics. These observations might begin to account for differences in the properties of different vesicle pools.     

Heterogeneous presynaptic release probabilities: functional relevance for short-term plasticity

We discuss a model of presynaptic vesicle dynamics, which allows for heterogeneity in release probability among vesicles. Specifically, we explore the possibility that synaptic activity is carried by two types of vesicles; first, a readily releasable pool and, second, a reluctantly releasable pool. The pools differ regarding their probability of release and time scales on which released vesicles are replaced by new ones. Vesicles of both pools increase their release probability during repetitive stimulation according to the buildup of Ca(2+) concentration in the terminal. These properties are modeled to fit data from the calyx of Held, a giant synapse in the auditory pathway. We demonstrate that this arrangement of two pools of releasable vesicles can account for a variety of experimentally observed patterns of synaptic depression and facilitation at this synapse. We conclude that synaptic transmission cannot be accurately described unless heterogeneity of synaptic release probability is taken into account.     

Tetanic stimulation recruits vesicles from reserve pool via a cAMP-mediated process in Drosophila synapses

At Drosophila neuromuscular junctions, there are two synaptic vesicle pools, namely the exo/endo cycling pool (ECP) and the reserve pool (RP). We studied the recruitment process from RP using a fluorescent dye, FMI-43. During high-frequency nerve stimulation, vesicles in RP were recruited for release, and endocytosed vesicles were incorporated into both pools, whereas with low-frequency stimulation, vesicles were incorporated into and released from ECP. Release of vesicles from RP was detected electrophysiologically after emptying vesicles in the ECP of transmitter by a H+ pump inhibitor. Recruitment from RP was depressed by inhibitors of steps in the cAMP/PKA cascade and enhanced by their activators. In rutabaga (rut) with low cAMP levels, mobilization of vesicles from RP during tetanic stimulation was depressed, while it was enhanced in dunce (dnc) with high cAMP levels.     

Synaptic vesicle pools at the frog neuromuscular junction

We have characterized the morphological and functional properties of the readily releasable pool (RRP) and the reserve pool of synaptic vesicles in frog motor nerve terminals using fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy, and electrophysiology. At rest, about 20% of vesicles reside in the RRP, which is depleted in about 10 s by high-frequency nerve stimulation (30 Hz); the RRP refills in about 1 min, and surprisingly, refilling occurs almost entirely by recycling, not mobilization from the reserve pool. The reserve pool is depleted during 30 Hz stimulation with a time constant of about 40 s, and it refills slowly (half-time about 8 min) as nascent vesicles bud from randomly distributed cisternae and surface membrane infoldings and enter vesicle clusters spaced at regular intervals along the terminal. Transmitter output during low-frequency stimulation (2-5 Hz) is maintained entirely by RRP recycling; few if any vesicles are mobilized from the reserve pool.     

Rapid reuse of readily releasable pool vesicles at hippocampal synapses

Functional presynaptic vesicles have been subdivided into readily releasable (RRP) and reserve (RP) pools. We studied recycling properties of RRP vesicles through differential retention of FM1-43 and FM2-10 and by varying the time window for FM dye uptake. Both approaches indicated that vesicles residing in the RRP underwent rapid endocytosis (tau approximately 1s), whereas newly recruited RP vesicles were recycled slowly (tau approximately 30 s). With repeated challenges (hypertonic or electrical stimuli), the ability to release neurotransmitter recovered 10-fold more rapidly than restoration of FM2-10 destaining. Finding neurotransmission in the absence of destaining implied that rapidly endocytosed RRP vesicles were capable of reuse, a process distinct from repopulation from the RP. Reuse would greatly expand the functional capabilities of a limited number of vesicles in CNS terminals, particularly during intermittent bursts of activity.     

Evidence for a primary endocytic vesicle involved in synaptic vesicle biogenesis

The regulated release of neurotransmitters at synapses is mediated by the fusion of neurotransmitter-filled synaptic vesicles with the plasma membrane. Continuous synaptic activity relies on the constant recycling of synaptic vesicle proteins into newly formed synaptic vesicles. At least two different mechanisms are presumed to mediate synaptic vesicle biogenesis at the synapse as follows: direct retrieval of synaptic vesicle proteins and lipids from the plasma membrane, and indirect passage of synaptic vesicle proteins through an endosomal intermediate. We have identified a vesicle population with the characteristics of a primary endocytic vesicle responsible for the recycling of synaptic vesicle proteins through the indirect pathway. We find that synaptic vesicle proteins colocalize in this vesicle with a variety of proteins known to recycle from the plasma membrane through the endocytic pathway, including three different glucose transporters, GLUT1, GLUT3, and GLUT4, and the transferrin receptor. These vesicles differ from "classical" synaptic vesicles in their size and their generic protein content, indicating that they do not discriminate between synaptic vesicle-specific proteins and other recycling proteins. We propose that these vesicles deliver synaptic vesicle proteins that have escaped internalization by the direct pathway to endosomes, where they are sorted from other recycling proteins and packaged into synaptic vesicles.     

Synapsin I-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase mediates synaptic vesicle delivery to the readily releasable pool

Maintaining synaptic transmission requires replenishment of docked synaptic vesicles within the readily releasable pool (RRP) from synaptic vesicle clusters in the synapsin-bound reserve pool. We show that synapsin forms a complex with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) in intact nerve terminals and that synapsin-associated kinase activity increases on depolarization. Disruption of either PI 3-kinase activity or its interaction with synapsin inhibited replenishment of the RRP, but did not affect exocytosis from the RRP. Thus we conclude that a synapsin-associated PI 3-kinase activity plays a role in synaptic vesicle delivery to the RRP. This also suggests that PI 3-kinase contributes to the maintenance of synaptic transmission during periods of high activity, indicating a possible role in synaptic plasticity.     

v-SNARE composition distinguishes synaptic vesicle pools

Synaptic vesicles belong to two distinct pools, a recycling pool responsible for the evoked release of neurotransmitter and a resting pool unresponsive to stimulation. The uniform appearance of synaptic vesicles has suggested that differences in location or cytoskeletal association account for these differences in function. We now find that the v-SNARE tetanus toxin-insensitive vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP7) differs from other synaptic vesicle proteins in its distribution to the two pools, providing evidence that they differ in molecular composition. We also find that both resting and recycling pools undergo spontaneous release, and when activated by deletion of the longin domain, VAMP7 influences the properties of release. Further, the endocytosis that follows evoked and spontaneous release differs in mechanism, and specific sequences confer targeting to the different vesicle pools. The results suggest that different endocytic mechanisms generate synaptic vesicles with different proteins that can endow the vesicles with distinct properties.     

Immunocytochemical Localization of Synaptic Proteins at Vesicular Organelles in PC12 Cells

The distribution of the three synaptic vesicle proteins SV2, synaptophysin and synaptotagmin, and of SNAP-25, a component of the docking and fusion complex, was investigated in PC12 cells by immunocytochemistry. Colloidal gold particle-bound secondary antibodies and a preembedding protocol were applied. Granules were labeled for SV2 and synaptotagmin but not for synaptophysin. Electron-lucent vesicles were labeled most intensively for synaptophysin but also for SV2 and to a lesser extent for synaptotagmin. The t-SNARE SNAP-25 was found at the plasma membrane but also at the surface of granules. Labeling of Golgi vesicles was observed for all antigens investigated. Also components of the endosomal pathway such as multivesicular bodies and multilamellar bodies were occasionally marked. The results suggest that the three membrane-integral synaptic vesicle proteins can have a differential distribution between electron-lucent vesicles (of which PC12 cells may possess more than one type) and granules. The membrane compartment of granules appears not to be an immediate precursor of that of electron-lucent vesicles.     

基于成串刺激计算立即释放囊泡池（RRP）大小的改进方法

突触囊泡的立即释放囊泡池（RRP）概念已被广泛用于突触传递的分析. 基于这些囊泡池中囊泡性质是均匀的假设，通过外推成串刺激累积诱发的突触后兴奋性电流，已经开发了几种确定RRP大小的方法. 然而，使用不同刺激频率确定这些成串刺激得到的RRP大小结果不同. 这种频率依赖性显示了这些估算方法的不完备性，与RRP的定义相矛盾. 因此，我们提出了基于成串刺激计算RRP大小的改进算法. 假设RRP的填充率正比于RRP释放的部分，并且矫正RRP的未使用部分，给出RRP释放过程的完整数学描述，得到具体的解析结果. 与已知的两种常用方法做比较，该方法很好地描述了RRP的释放和填充过程，得到了比较良好的RRP大小和囊泡释放概率大小的评估. 该方法不受刺激频率的条件限制，可以很好地适用于不能给予高频刺激的细胞.     

Regulation of synaptic vesicles pools within motor nerve terminals during short-term facilitation and neuromodulation.

The reserve pool (RP) and readily releasable pool (RRP) of synaptic vesicles within presynaptic nerve terminals were physiologically differentiated into distinctly separate functional groups. This was accomplished in glutamatergic nerve terminals by blocking the glutamate transporter with dl-threo-beta-benzyloxyaspartate (TBOA; 10 microM) during electrical stimulation with either 40 Hz of 10 pulses within a train or 20- or 50-Hz continuous stimulation. The 50-Hz continuous stimulation decreased the excitatory postsynaptic potential amplitude 60 min faster than for the 20-Hz continuous stimulation in the presence of TBOA (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the train stimulation and 20-Hz continuous stimulation in the run-down time in the presence of TBOA. After TBOA-induced synaptic depression, the excitatory postsynaptic potentials were rapidly (<1 min) revitalized by exposure to serotonin (5-HT, 1 microM) in every preparation tested (P < 0.05). At this glutamatergic nerve terminal, 5-HT promotes an increase probability of vesicular docking and fusion. Quantal recordings made directly at nerve terminals revealed smaller quantal sizes with TBOA exposure with a marked increase in quantal size as well as a continual appearance of smaller quanta upon 5-HT treatment after TBOA-induced depression. Thus 5-HT was able to recruit vesicles from the RP that were not rapidly depleted by acute TBOA treatment and electrical stimulation. The results support the notion that the RRP is selectively activated during rapid electrical stimulation sparing the RP; however, the RP can be recruited by the neuromodulator 5-HT. This suggests at least two separate kinetic and distinct regulatory paths for vesicle recycling within the presynaptic nerve terminal.     

Loss of skywalker reveals synaptic endosomes as sorting stations for synaptic vesicle proteins

Exchange of proteins at sorting endosomes is not only critical to numerous signaling pathways but also to receptor-mediated signaling and to pathogen entry into cells; however, how this process is regulated in synaptic vesicle cycling remains unexplored. In this work, we present evidence that loss of function of a single neuronally expressed GTPase activating protein (GAP), Skywalker (Sky) facilitates endosomal trafficking of synaptic vesicles at Drosophila neuromuscular junction boutons, chiefly by controlling Rab35 GTPase activity. Analyses of genetic interactions with the ESCRT machinery as well as chimeric ubiquitinated synaptic vesicle proteins indicate that endosomal trafficking facilitates the replacement of dysfunctional synaptic vesicle components. Consequently, sky mutants harbor a larger readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles and show a dramatic increase in basal neurotransmitter release. Thus, the trafficking of vesicles via endosomes uncovered using sky mutants provides an elegant mechanism by which neurons may regulate synaptic vesicle rejuvenation and neurotransmitter release.     

SV2 and o-rab3 Remain Associated with Recycling Synaptic Vesicles

Abstract: o-rab3 is an electric ray homologue of low molecular weight GTP-binding proteins thought to be involved in targeting of secretory vesicles to sites of exocytosis. The stimulation-dependent association of o-rab3 with synaptic vesicles was compared with that of the membrane-integral synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2). On application of immunoelectron microscopy and the colloidal gold technique, antibodies against either protein labeled the synaptic vesicle membrane compartment. Synaptic vesicles recycled under conditions of low frequency stimulation (0.1 Hz) retained their complement of both SV2 and o-rab3. Isolation of synaptic vesicles by density-gradient centrifugation and subsequent column chromatography yielded no indication of a stimulation-dependent release of o-rab3 from synaptic vesicles. In contrast, multivesicular bodies and vacuoles occasionally observed in the nerve terminals contained SV2 but little if any o-rab3. It is concluded that o-rab3 remains associated with the synaptic vesicle membrane compartment during stimulation-induced cycles of repeated exo- and endocytosis. o-rab3 may be lost once the vesicle enters the prelysosomal pathway.     

Membrane Composition of Adrenergic Large and Small Dense Core Vesicles and of Synaptic Vesicles: Consequences for Their Biogenesis

The membrane proteins of adrenergic large dense core vesicles, in particular those of chromaffin granules, have been characterized in detail. With the exception of the nucleotide carrier all major peptides have been cloned. There has been a controversy whether these vesicles contain antigens like synaptophysin, synaptotagmin and VAMP or synaptobrevin found in high concentration in synaptic vesicles. One can now conclude that large dense core vesicles also contain these peptides although in lower concentrations. The biosynthesis of large dense core vesicles is analogous to that of other peptide secreting vesicles of the regulated pathway. One cannot yet definitely define the biosynthesis of small dense core vesicles which apparently have a very similar membrane composition to that of large dense core vesicles. They may form directly from large dense core vesicles when their membranes have been retrieved after exocytosis. These membranes may become sorted in an endosomal compartment where peptides may be deleted or added. Such an addition could be derived from synaptophysin-rich vesicles present in adrenergic axons. However small dense core vesicle peptides may also be transported axonally independent of large dense core vesicles. For proving one of these possibilities some crucial experiments have been suggested.     

Compartmentalization of monoaminergic synaptic vesicles in the storage and release of neurotransmitter

Monoaminergic nerves are characterized by the presence of a population of small synaptic vesicles (40-60 nm in diameter) containing a few large vesicles (80-90 nm in diameter). Thus, although both types of vesicles contain monoamines, the small vesicles must be considered as the organoid responsible for the storage and release of the neurotransmitter, whereas the large ones possibly are involved in the modulation of the process. The small vesicles are electron-lucent or have an osmiophilic electron-dense core that is always linked to the vesicle membrane. Considering morphological and histochemical evidence under different experimental conditions, we proposed the existence of two compartments in the small vesicles: the core and the matrix, corresponding respectively to the electron-dense core and the electron-lucent space between the core and the vesicle membrane in osmium tetroxide fixations. The sizes of both compartments are inversely related, i.e., the smaller the core, the larger the matrix and vice versa. The core even disappears, giving way to a small electron-lucent vesicle made exclusively by the matrix. Thus, the matrix is a constant component of the vesicle, whereas the core is a transient one. Each compartment has a different pool of amine: a loosely bound, easily releasable pool in the matrix and a tightly bound, more resistant pool in the core. These two pools subserve, respectively, a tonic or phasic release of the neurotransmitter, correlated with a tonic or phasic stimulation of the receptor. The core may be considered as a storage or reserve pool. Experimental evidence from our laboratory supports the concept that different mechanisms are operative in both compartments in the release of the neurotransmitter. For instance, a Ca2(+)-independent release would be primarily concerned with the neurotransmitter contained in the matrix, and a Ca2(+)-dependent efflux would be primarily related with the neurotransmitter stored in the core. However, it still must be established that a simple relationship exists between each kind of stimulus and each vesicle compartment, rather than both compartments being integrated in a dynamic functional unit.