Induction and persistence of suppression of contact hypersensitivity against bystander haptens and alloantigens in rats

The shift of suppression from a tolerizing hapten to a so-called bystander antigen was investigated in this study using contact hypersensitivity to trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB) and dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) to alloantigens in the rats as experimental models. Primary suppression of contact hypersensitivity was induced by intravenous injection of the water-soluble forms of TNCB and DNFB. A shift of the suppression to the bystander hapten was found if the tolerizing and bystander hapten were mixed and applied to the same area of skin during the sensitization procedure, but not if they were applied to separate areas of skin. With alloantigens, bystander suppression developed only when the sensitizing allogeneic cells were mixed with hapten-modified syngeneic cells. It was not induced by hapten-modified allogeneic cells. Once induced, such bystander suppression of the response to haptens persisted independently of the primarily tolerizing hapten, and it could be adoptively transferred with spleen cells. These results favour the concept that the bystander suppression is mediated by the non-specific action of suppressor cells generated specifically during the mixed sensitization rather than by an antigen bridge.     

Induced suppression of the efferent phase of contact sensitivity in rats

A study of the immunosuppressive systems of rats has been conducted with special attention to whether suppressor cells can be induced to down-regulate the efferent limb of contact sensitivity. Contact sensitivity (CS)1 was induced in DA rats 5 days after immunization with trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB). Intravenous pretreatment of naive rats with TNP-coupled syngeneic spleen cells 7 days before sensitization suppressed the induction of CS by 60%. Suppression of the inductive phase of CS could be transferred adoptively into syngeneic rats with spleen cells of such tolerized animals. Cell fractionation studies showed the OX8+ (CD8) T cell population (cytotoxic/suppressor) was responsible for the suppression in the afferent phase of CS. Such cells were incapable of suppressing preexisting CS. To investigate whether suppression could be induced for the efferent phase, spleen and peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) from rats tolerized by administering TNP-spleen cells iv plus epidermal paintings with TNCB were adoptively transferred into recipients sensitized 4 days earlier. Both spleen cells and PEC suppressed the efferent phase of CS but PEC did so more efficiently. Separation of splenic cells revealed the suppressors to be CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, separation of PEC into plastic adherent and nonadherent cells showed the nonadherent (T cell enriched) cells to be noneffective alone. The adherent subpopulation conveyed suppression but did so more effectively upon addition of the T cells. Thus, T cells and macrophages may operate in concert to achieve suppression of the efferent limb of CS. PEC from tolerized rats suppressed performed CS of any specificity but only after the suppressor cells were triggered with the same antigen that induced them. Since both the afferent and efferent phases of CS have now been shown to be suppressable, two separate suppressor mechanisms may be operable in rats.     

Orally induced tolerance generates an efferently acting suppressor T cell and an acceptor T cell that together down-regulate contact sensitivity

Intragastric administration of the hapten trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB) suppresses development of contact sensitivity (CS) to attempted epicutaneous sensitization with TNCB. Suppression induced by feeding TNCB is hapten specific and can be transferred to normal animals with lymphoid cells from fed mice. The lymphoid cells in hapten-fed mice that cause suppression of CS have been identified as Thy-1.2-positive cells in spleen and mesenteric nodes. The suppression with Peyer's patch cells from hapten-fed mice appears to be attributable to cells bearing Thy-1.2 antigen (T cell) and to cells with surface Ig (B cell). Feeding TNCB induces an efferent-acting suppressor T cell (Ts eff), as well as an intermediary acceptor T cell (T acc) with which it interacts to block adoptive transfer of CS with immune cells. Ts eff emanating from hapten-fed mice was identified by its specificity for the hapten, insensitivity to pretreatment with cyclophosphamide (CY), ability to produce soluble suppressor factor (SSF), and requirement for T acc to be functional. The presence of T acc in hapten-fed mice, on the other hand, was confirmed by its sensitivity to treatment with CY, interaction with Ts eff or SSF, and the ability to produce nonspecific inhibitor of TDTH cells. Thus, the suppressor T cells that are induced by administering the hapten intragastrically appear to function much like the cells of the suppressor T cell cascade that are induced by giving hapten via parenteral routes.     

Induction of in vivo hyporesponsiveness to contact allergens by hapten-modified Ia+ keratinocytes.

Because our previous in vitro studies of hapten-modified Ia+ keratinocytes (KC) indicated that these cells induced anergy in Ag-specific Th1 cells, we assayed such cells for their ability to induce unresponsiveness in an in vivo animal model system of delayed type hypersensitivity (allergic contact dermatitis). Naive animals that were treated with i.p. injections of FITC-modified Ia+ cultured Langerhans cells (cLC) developed allergic contact dermatitis to subsequent hapten challenge; whereas, animals treated with similar doses of FITC-Ia+ KC failed to become sensitized to epicutaneous application of FITC, as evidenced by absent ear swelling responses to a FITC challenge. Those animals that were first treated with intraperitoneal injections of hapten modified Ia+ KC could not be sensitized when they were subsequently exposed to sensitizing doses of FITC; whereas a similar first exposure to FITC-cultured Langerhans cells did not interfere with epicutaneous sensitization. This hyporesponsiveness to sensitization was hapten specific, as FITC-Ia+ KC-treated animals were hyporesponsive only to FITC but not to the irrelevant hapten, TNCB. Additionally, Ia- KC failed to induce unresponsiveness. Additional studies indicate that the hyporesponsiveness was not passively transferrable with splenocytes and was not related to the I-J MHC locus. In contrast to our in vitro studies, the unresponsiveness induced by hapten-modified Ia+ KC in vivo was transient in nature. These data indicate that hapten-modified Ia+ KC function in vivo as nonstimulatory accessory cells, by generating down-regulatory signals that can interfere with the induction of contact hypersensitivity.     

Oral administration of hapten inhibits in vivo induction of specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells mediating tissue inflammation: a role for regulatory CD4+ T cells

We investigated whether oral tolerance could block the development of an inflammatory response mediated by CD8+ T cells, using a mouse model of oral tolerance of contact sensitivity (CS) to the hapten 2, 4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB). In this system, the skin inflammatory response is initiated by hapten-specific class I-restricted cytotoxic CD8+ T (CTL) cells, independently of CD4 help. Oral delivery of DNFB before skin sensitization blocked the CS response by impairing the development of DNFB-specific CD8+ effector T cells in secondary lymphoid organs. This was shown by complete inhibition of DNFB-specific CTL and proliferative responses of CD8+ T cells, lack of specific IFN-gamma-producing CD8+ T cells, and inability of CD8+ T cells to transfer CS in RAG20/0 mice. RT-PCR and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that recruitment of CD8+ effectors of CS in the skin at the site of hapten challenge was impaired in orally tolerized mice. Sequential anti-CD4 Ab treatment showed that only depletion of CD4+ T cells during the afferent phase of CS abrogated oral tolerance induction by restoring high numbers of specific CD8+ effectors in lymphoid organs, whereas CD4 depletion during the efferent phase of CS did not affect oral tolerance. These data demonstrate that a single intragastric administration of hapten can block in vivo induction of DNFB-specific CD8+ CTL responsible for tissue inflammation and that a subset of regulatory CD4+ T cells mediate oral tolerance by inhibiting expansion of specific CD8+ effectors in lymph nodes.     

Immunomodulating activities of staphylococcal enterotoxins. I. Effects on in vivo antibody responses and contact sensitivity reaction

The immunomodulating effects of staphylococcal enterotoxins on in vivo immune responses in C57BL/6 mice were examined. Of the five serological types A (SEA), B, C, D, and E (SEE), only SEA and SEE markedly suppressed the antibody response to sheep red blood cells (SRBC) when injected 1 day before or on the day of immunization with SRBC. Further study of SEA revealed that it did not affect the antibody response to a thymus-independent antigen, salmonella flagella, but did affect the T-cell-mediated immune response. Contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) was suppressed when SEA was injected before sensitization or before challenge with DNFB, indicating that SEA affected both the afferent and efferent phases of DNFB contact sensitivity. As the suppression of DNFB contact sensitivity could be transferred by anti-Thy-1.2 antibody-sensitive spleen cells of SEA injected donors into normal or DNFB-sensitized recipients, the suppression was thought to be an active one. However, SEA could augment the DNFB contact sensitivity when injected on the third day after sensitization with DNFB. These results indicate that the immunomodulating effects of SEA can be mediated by the T-cell function.     

Ultraviolet radiation-induced regulatory T cells not only inhibit the induction but can suppress the effector phase of contact hypersensitivity

Epicutaneous application of haptens to UV-exposed skin induces hapten-specific tolerance. This is mediated via regulatory T cells (Tr), as i.v. injection of T cells from UV-tolerized mice into naive animals renders the recipients unresponsive to the respective hapten. However, when UV-induced Tr are injected i.v. into sensitized mice, contact hypersensitivity (CHS) is not suppressed, suggesting that Tr inhibit the induction, but not the elicitation, of CHS and are inferior to T effector cells. As sensitization takes place in the lymph nodes, but elicitation occurs in the area of challenge, we postulated that Tr injected i.v. locate to the lymph nodes and not to the periphery and therefore only suppress the induction, not the elicitation, of CHS. Indeed, i.v. injection of Tr into sensitized mice did not inhibit CHS, although injection of Tr into the ears of sensitized mice suppressed the challenge. Inhibition was hapten specific, as injection of dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB)-specific Tr into the ears of oxazolone (OXA)-sensitized mice did not affect challenge with OXA. However, when ears of OXA-sensitized mice were injected with DNFB-specific Tr and painted with DNFB before OXA challenge, CHS was suppressed. Inhibition correlated with the local expression of IL-10. Depletion studies and FACS analysis revealed that Tr express the lymph node-homing receptor L-selectin, but not the ligands for the skin-homing receptors E- and P-selectin, suggesting that UV-induced Tr, although able to inhibit T effector cells, do not suppress the elicitation of CHS upon i.v. injection, because they obviously do not migrate into the skin.     

Suppressor cells for the afferent phase of contact sensitivity to picryl chloride: inhibition of DNA synthesis induced by T cells from mice injected with picryl sulfonic acid.

Previous reports have shown that picryl sulfonic acid (PSA) induces suppressor T cells that inhibit the effector phase of contact sensitivity, whereeas its DNP counterpart, dinitrobenzenesulfonate (DNBS) induces cells that inhibit the afferent phase of sensitization. Accordingly, cells from mice injected with DNBS, but not PSA, could be shown to inhibit the DNA synthesis in the lymph nodes that occurs during sensitization. It is now shown that PSA does induce T cells that suppress DNA synthesis but this can only be detected with enriched T cells or by using a regimen of PSA injection different frm previously used to induce suppressor cells for the effector phase. The T cells did not affect responses to oxazolone or dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and were distinguishable from suppressors of the efferent phase in that they could be produced in adult thymectomized but not cyclophosphamide-treated mice. T cells from mice injected with DNBS that inhibited DNA synthesis to DNFB had the same properties.     

Phenotypic and functional characterization of ultraviolet radiation-induced regulatory T cells

Sensitization through UV-exposed skin induces regulatory T cells (Treg). In contrast to the classical CD4+CD25+ Treg that act contact dependent, UV-induced Treg (UV-Treg) suppress via IL-10, indicating a distinct subtype that requires further characterization. Depletion studies revealed that UV-Treg express the glucocorticoid-induced TNF family-related receptor (GITR) and the surface molecule neuropilin-1. The injection of T cells from UV-tolerized mice after depletion of UV-Treg into naive recipients enabled a contact hypersensitivity response, indicating that tolerization also induces T effector cells. Adoptive transfer experiments using IL-10-deficient mice indicated that the IL-10 required for suppression is derived from UV-Treg and not from host-derived cells. Activation of UV-Treg is Ag specific, however, once activated suppression is nonspecific (bystander suppression). Hence, speculations exist about the therapeutic potential of Treg generated in response to Ag that are not necessarily the precise Ag driving the pathogenic process. Thus, we studied the consequences of multiple injections of 2,4-dintrofluorobenzene (DNFB)-specific Treg into ears of naive mice followed by multiple DNFB challenges. DNFB-specific Treg were injected once weekly into the left ears of naive mice and DNFB challenge was performed always 24 h later. After three injections, a challenging dose of DNFB was applied on the right ear. This resulted in pronounced ear swelling, indicating that the subsequent boosting of DNFB-specific Treg had caused sensitization of the naive mice against DNFB. These data demonstrate that UV-Treg express GITR and neuropilin-1 and act via bystander suppression. However, constant boosting of Treg with Ag doses in the challenging range results in final sensitization that might limit their therapeutic potential.     

Prevention by the MER tubercle bacillus fraction of immunosuppression induced by cancer chemotherapeutic agents

Summary Contact hypersensitivity (CH) to 2,4 dinitro-1-fluorobenzene (DNFB) was induced in BALB/c mice by DNFB skin application. Development of skin CH was suppressed by exposure of the animals after sensitization to the cancer chemotherapeutic drugs cyclophosphamide (CY), sodium methotrexate (MTX), and 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Unresponsiveness to DNFB was also induced in parallel experiments by a single intravenous injection of dinitrobenzenesulfonate (DNBS), either before or concomitant with sensitization. Potentiation of CH skin reactivity was achieved by administration of CY prior to sensitization.Pretreatment by two injections of the methanol extraction residue (MER) tubercle bacillus fraction restored significantly the ability of animals exposed to CY, MTX, or 5FU to respond to DNFB sensitization. The agent did not impair the potentiation of CH skin reactivity that could be effected by administration of CY prior to sensitization.MER treatment was not effective in reversing hapten-induced (DNBS) tolerance in mice.These findings favor the assumption that MER, under the conditions tested, stimulates the function of positively reacting T cells and exerts no enhancing or protective action on suppressor T cells.     

Genetic control of contract hypersensitivity. II. Suppressor cells induced by intravenous injection of DNP-coupled syngeneic spleen cells possessing thy-1 antigen, I-J determinant, Lyt-2+, 3+ antigen, FcR- and DNP-membrane binding receptor on their surfaces

The characteristics of suppressor cells induced by 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP)-coupled syngeneic lymphocytes (syninduced suppressor cells) were studied. 2,4-dinitro-1-fluorobenzene (DNFB) contact hypersensitivity was completely suppressed when the syninduced suppressor cells were transferred intravenously. These syninduced suppressor cells had surface markers of Thy-1, FcR^? and Lyt-2⁺, 3⁺ antigens, as well as I-J gene products on their cell surfaces. The suppression of DNFB contact hypersensitivity was abrogated when these suppressor T cells were incubated in Petri dishes coated with the DNP-syngeneic lymphoid cell membrane, which suggests that these suppressor T cells had the specific antigen-binding receptors on their cell surfaces.     

Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. V. Induction of tolerance with DNP compounds and with free and membrane-associated DNFB.

Immunologic unresponsiveness (tolerance) was induced in a mouse model of contact sensitization to DNFB. The ability to induce tolerance varied with the chemical reactivity of the tolerogen; DNFB was highly tolerogenic, DNBSO3 was moderately tolerogenic, and DNP-lysine was not tolerogenic. Although DNFB is considered a highly reactive compound, tracer studies of injected DNFB showed that it was rapidly excreted. Further studies were therefore done with DNFB attached to mouse erythrocytes. Tolerance to DNFB-RBC was highly specific in vivo; mice tolerant to DNFB showed normal reactivity to TNCB (picryl chloride.) Cells of mice tolerant to DNFB-RBC were also unresponsive to DNBSO3 in vitro. Tolerance to DNFB, DNBSO3, and DNFB-RBC all required time to develop, suggesting that an active process was involved.     

Allergic contact dermatitis induced by intratracheal administration of hapten

It is known that the skin is the natural route for induction of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Because the lung is another potential portal of entry for sensitizing chemicals, studies were performed to evaluate immune responses to haptens deposited in the lung. As a result, a new method for inducing ACD was developed. Intratracheal (IT) inoculation of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) led to maximal ear swelling 24 hr after challenge on the ear with 2,4,6-trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB) in carrier. This response was specific for immunizing hapten. Furthermore, it was equally possible to induce ACD by intratracheal inoculation of trinitrophenyl- (TNP) modified bronchoalveolar cells (BAC) or haptenated spleen cells. Adoptive transfer studies demonstrated that the hypersensitivity that resulted from IT inoculation of TNBS or TNP BAC could be transferred with cells. With a monoclonal anti-hamster Ia reagent, it was demonstrated that, like Langerhans cells, 80 to 90% of cells in the bronchial lavage fluid expressed Ia determinants on their membrane. These cells were morphologically indistinguishable from macrophages. Because an individual is capable of being sensitized when hapten is introduced by the pulmonary or epicutaneous routes, the possibility is raised that the alveolar macrophages in the lung possess a similar capability for antigen presentation of hapten in the induction of ACD as does the Langerhans cell.     

Involvement of dectin-2 in ultraviolet radiation-induced tolerance

Hapten sensitization through UV-exposed skin induces hapten-specific tolerance which can be adoptively transferred by injecting T cells into naive recipients. The exact phenotype of the regulatory T cells responsible for inhibiting the immune response and their mode of action remain largely unclear. Dectin-2 is a C-type lectin receptor expressed on APCs. It was postulated that dectin-2 interacts with its putative ligands on T cells and that the interaction may deliver costimulatory signals in naive T cells. Using a soluble fusion protein of dectin-2 (sDec2) which should inhibit this interaction, we studied the effect on contact hypersensitivity (CHS) and its modulation by UV radiation. Injection of sDec2 affected neither the induction nor the elicitation phase of CHS. In contrast, UV-induced inhibition of the CHS induction was prevented upon injection of sDec2. In addition, hapten-specific tolerance did not develop. Even more importantly, injection of sDec2 into tolerized mice rendered the recipients susceptible to the specific hapten, indicating that sDec2 can break established tolerance. FACS analysis of spleen and lymph node cells revealed a significantly increased portion of sDec2-binding T cells in UV-tolerized mice. Furthermore, transfer of UV-mediated suppression was lost upon depletion of the sDec2-positive T cells. Taken together, these data indicate that dectin-2 and its yet unidentified ligand may play a crucial role in the mediation of UV-induced immunosuppression. Moreover, sDec2-reactive T cells appear to represent the regulatory T cells responsible for mediating UV-induced tolerance.     

Evidence for functional relevance of CTLA-4 in ultraviolet-radiation-induced tolerance

Hapten sensitization through UV-exposed skin induces hapten-specific tolerance that can be adoptively transferred by injecting T lymphocytes into naive recipients. The exact phenotype of T cells responsible for inhibiting the immune response and their mode of action remain unclear. Evidence exists that CTLA-4 negatively regulates T cell activation. We addressed whether CTLA-4 is involved in the transfer of UV-induced tolerance. Injection of lymph node cells from mice that were sensitized with dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) through UV-irradiated skin inhibited induction of contact hypersensitivity against DNFB in the recipient animals. When CTLA-4+ cells were depleted, transfer of suppression was lost. Likewise, significantly fewer lymphocytes enriched for CTLA-4+ cells were necessary to transfer suppression than unfractionated cells. Expression of CTLA-4 appears to be functionally relevant, since in vivo injection of a blocking anti-CTLA-4 Ab was able to break UV-induced tolerance and inhibited transfer of suppression. Upon stimulation with dendritic cells in the presence of the water-soluble DNFB analogue, DNBS, CTLA-4+ T cells from DNFB-tolerized mice secreted high levels of IL-10, TGF-beta, and IFN-gamma; low levels of IL-2; and no IL-4, resembling the cytokine pattern of T regulatory 1 cells. Ab blocking of CTLA-4 resulted in inhibition of IL-10 release. Accordingly, transfer of tolerance was not observed when recipients were treated with an anti-IL-10 Ab. Hence we propose that T cells, possibly of the T regulatory 1 type, transfer UV-mediated suppression through the release of IL-10. Activation of CTLA-4 appears to be important in this process.     

Soluble factors in tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. VII. Characterization of a monoclonal, efferent-acting suppressor factor with specificity for DNP/H-2Kd

To study further soluble factors which regulate contact sensitivity (CS) to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB), hapten-primed spleen cells from BALB/c mice were used to make T-cell hybridomas. A hybrid constitutively producing a suppressor factor was identified and cloned (clone 3-10). Incubation of BALB/c DNFB immune lymph node cells (LNC) in the 3-10 supernatant suppressed the ability of the immune cells to transfer CS to DNFB. The passive transfer of CS to oxazalone or to 2,4,6-trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB) was not suppressed by the 3-10 factor. The hapten specificity of the 3-10 factor further was demonstrated by the ability of DNFB immune LNC but not LNC from unsensitized or from TNCB-sensitized mice to absorb the factor. The 3-10 factor also was adsorbed by DNFB-immune LNC from mice that were syngeneic with BALB/c mice at the K locus of the MHC (e.g., B10.D2 and D2.GD). Pretreatment of DNFB-immune LNC with monoclonal anti-Kd antibody or with anti-DNP antibodies blocked the ability to adsorb the factor. These results indicated that the 3-10 suppressor factor binds to DNP/H-2Kd complexes on immune LNC. Nylon wool-purified T cells (83% Thy-1.2+) from DNFB-immune LNC were able to adsorb the factor as well as unseparated immune LNC. Furthermore, treatment of immune LNC with anti-Thy-1.2 plus C' abrogated the ability of the cells to adsorb the factor, indicating that the cellular target of the 3-10 factor is a T cell. In addition, treatment of the immune LNC with an autoantiidiotypic antiserum (CS 231) plus C', which depletes DNP-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity effector T (TDH) cells, also abrogated the ability of the cells to adsorb the factor. Finally, the suppressor factor was adsorbed and eluted from DNP affinity columns but was not adsorbed by TNP affinity columns. Collectively, these results indicate that although the monoclonal 3-10 suppressor factor has affinity for DNP, focusing of the factor on the TDH cells requires recognition of DNP in the context of the appropriate MHC determinant, Kd.     

IL-1 receptor signaling is required at multiple stages of sensitization and elicitation of the contact hypersensitivity response

Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) is a CD8 T cell-mediated response to hapten skin sensitization and challenge. The points at which IL-1R signaling is required during this complex, multistep immune response have not been clearly delineated. The role of IL-1R signaling during 2, 4 dinitro-1-fluorobenezene (DNFB) sensitization to induce hapten-specific CD8 effector T cells and in the trafficking of the effector T cells to the DNFB challenge site to elicit the response were investigated using IL-1R deficient mice. DNFB-sensitized IL-1R(-/-) mice had low CHS responses to hapten challenge that were caused in part by marked decreases in hapten-specific CD8 T cell development to IL-17- and IFN-γ-producing cells during sensitization. Hapten-primed wild type CD8 T cell transfer to naive IL-1R(-/-) mice did not result in T cell activation in response to hapten challenge, indicating a need for IL-1R signaling for the localization or activation, or both, of the CD8 T cells at the challenge site. Decreased CD8 T cell priming in sensitized IL-1R(-/-) mice was associated with marked decreases in hapten-presenting dendritic cell migration from the sensitized skin to draining lymph nodes. Transfer of hapten-presenting dendritic cells from wild type donors to naive IL-1R(-/-) mice resulted in decreased numbers of the dendritic cells in the draining lymph nodes and decreased priming of hapten-specific CD8 T cells compared with dendritic cell transfer to naive wild type recipients. These results indicate that IL-1R signaling is required at multiple steps during the course of sensitization and challenge to elicit CHS.     

CD4+ and CD8+ T cell priming for contact hypersensitivity occurs independently of CD40-CD154 interactions

The primary effector cells of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) responses to dintrofluorobenzene (DNFB) are IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells, whereas CD4(+) T cells regulate the magnitude and duration of the response. The requirement for CD40-CD154 engagement during CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell priming by hapten-presenting Langerhans cells (hpLC) is undefined and was tested in the current study. Similar CHS responses to DNFB were elicited in wild-type and CD154(-/-) animals. DNFB sensitization of CD154(-/-) mice primed IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells and IL-4-producing CD4(+) T cells. However, anti-CD154 mAb MR1 given during hapten sensitization inhibited hapten-specific CD8(+), but not CD4(+), T cell development and the CHS response to challenge. F(ab')(2) of MR1 failed to inhibit CD8(+) T cell development and the CHS response suggesting that the mechanism of inhibition is distinct from that of CD40-CD154 blockade. Furthermore, anti-CD154 mAb did not inhibit CD8(+) T cell development and CHS responses in mice depleted of CD4(+) T cells or in CD4(-/-) mice. During in vitro proliferation assays, hpLC from mice treated with anti-CD154 mAb during DNFB sensitization were less stimulatory for hapten-primed T cells than hpLC from either control mice or mice depleted of CD4(+) T cells before anti-CD154 mAb administration. These results demonstrate that development of IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells and the CHS response are not dependent on CD40-CD154 interactions. This study proposes a novel mechanism of anti-CD154 mAb-mediated inhibition of CD8(+) T cell development where anti-CD154 mAb acts indirectly through CD4(+) T cells to impair the ability of hpLC to prime CD8(+) T cells.     

Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. VI. Inhibition of afferent sensitivity by suppressor T cells in adoptive tolerance.

Tolerance in contact sensitivity to DNFB can be adoptively transferred to normal mice with lymph node cells from tolerant donors. This tolerance is antigen specific and is mediated by T cells, i.e., "suppressor" T cells. Experiments were carried out to investigate the mechanism(s) by which the suppressor T cells induce tolerance to DNFB contact sensitivity. The suppressor cells were effective only if they were present during the early stages of the afferent limb of sensitization. As measured by DNA synthesis, cell proliferation in the draining lymph nodes of recipients of suppressor cells was found to be significantly less than in control animals indicating that the suppressor cells acted, at least in part, by limiting or inhibiting DNFB-induced cell proliferation. This inhibition was shown to be antigen specific since the DNFB suppressor cells did not inhibit cell proliferation induced by oxazolone, an unrelated contact sensitizer. The ability to DNFB tolerant cells to block afferent sensitization pathways differs from the mechanism of tolerance to picryl chloride, reported by others, where efferent pathways are blocked.     

Key role for mast cells in nonatopic asthma

The mechanisms involved in nonatopic asthma are poorly defined. In particular, the importance of mast cells in the development of nonatopic asthma is not clear. In the mouse, pulmonary hypersensitivity reactions induced by skin sensitization with the low-m.w. compound dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) followed by an intra-airway application of the hapten have been featured as a model for nonatopic asthma. In present study, we used this model to examine the role of mast cells in the pathogenesis of nonatopic asthma. First, the effect of DNFB sensitization and intra-airway challenge with dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNS) on mast cell activation was monitored during the early phase of the response in BALB/c mice. Second, mast cell-deficient W/W(v) and Sl/Sl(d) mice and their respective normal (+/+) littermate mice and mast cell-reconstituted W/W(v) mice (bone marrow-derived mast cells-->W/W(v)) were used. Early phase mast cell activation was found, which was maximal 30 min after DNS challenge in DNFB-sensitized BALB/c, +/+ mice but not in mast cell-deficient mice. An acute bronchoconstriction and increase in vascular permeability accompanied the early phase mast cell activation. BALB/c, +/+ and bone marrow-derived mast cell-->W/W(v) mice sensitized with DNFB and DNS-challenged exhibited tracheal hyperreactivity 24 and 48 h after the challenge when compared with vehicle-treated mice. Mucosal exudation and infiltration of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid associated the late phase response. Both mast cell-deficient strains failed to show any features of this hypersensitivity response. Our findings show that mast cells play a key role in the regulation of pulmonary hypersensitivity responses in this murine model for nonatopic asthma.