微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石

目的:探讨微创经皮肾取石术(MPCNL)治疗上尿路结石的效果.方法:分别应用激光碎石术和气压弹道超声碎石术通过经皮肾镜通道治疗76例、82例上尿路结石,分析比较其结石清除率、出血量、手术时间等指标.结果:①微创经皮肾镜气压弹道超声碎石术Ⅰ期结石清除率为95.12%,高于激光碎石术的88.16%Ⅰ期结石清除率,差异具有显著性(P＜0.05).②气压弹道超声碎石术平均手术时间(74 min)和平均出血量(35 ml),显著少于激光碎石术的平均手术时间(92 min)和平均出血量(65 ml),差异具有显著性(P＜0.05).③两种治疗方法在造瘘管置留时间、平均住院时间、积水好转率、术后复发率上差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论:微创经皮肾镜气压弹道超声碎石术相较于微创经激光碎石术在上尿路结石治疗中更为安全有效.     

输尿管上段嵌顿性结石两种微创钬激光碎石术临床疗效对比研究

目的:探讨应用钬激光在输尿管镜碎石术及微创经皮肾穿刺取石术处理输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效和并发症的比较。方法:2009年2月～2011年6月我院182例输尿管上段嵌顿性结石患者,应用钬激光经URL治疗85例,MPCNL治疗97例,对两种方法疗效进行临床评价比较。结果:MPCNL术中一期碎石清除率为(93/97)95.88%,5例残石者残石大小0.2～0.4 mm,术后1月结石清除率为(97/97)100%,平均手术时间75±29 min,平均住院时间为12±5 d,平均住院费用14589±3284 RMB;URL术一期碎石清除率为(39/85)45.88%,46例残石者残石大小0.3～1.5 mm,需术后联合体外冲击波碎石术等治疗排石,术后1月结石清除率为(72/85)84.71%,平均手术时间102±43 min,平均住院时间为6±3 d,平均住院费用9086±1259 RMB。MPCNL术中有1例因穿刺后出血改行二期MPCNL术。URL术中输尿管扭曲、狭窄、息肉出血视野模糊不清,需改行切开取石术6例,结石移位到肾内改行MPCNL术11例。结论:对于嵌顿性输尿管上段结石,采用MPCNL和URL联合钬激光治疗各有其优缺点。MPCNL安全、高效、并发症少、创伤小、结石清除率高;URL相对具有恢复快、住院时间短、费用较低等优点,但结石移位发生率、残石率较高,需其他辅助方式治疗结石。因此输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的手术方式选择应根据结石位置、大小、梗阻程度、肾积水量、患者经济状况,术前检查结果,充分评估手术风险和难度,结合患者个体差异,术者的经验制定出最佳治疗方案。     

Ⅱ期经皮输尿管镜治疗输尿管上段结石梗阻致孤立肾急性肾功能衰竭

目的:探讨经皮肾微造瘘术后Ⅱ期经皮输尿管镜治疗输尿管上段结石致孤立肾急性肾功能衰竭的安全性与有效性。方法:从2004年7月～2009年5月,利用经皮肾微造瘘建立经皮肾通道,引流1周后肾功能明显好转,再行经皮肾输尿管镜碎石治疗孤立肾输尿管上段结石。结果:16例患者中,所有患者均为单通道取石,结石清除率例(81.2%),未出现高热、出血等并发症。术后1月复查13例无结石残留。结论:微创经皮输尿管镜分期治疗输尿管上段结石致孤立肾急性肾功能衰竭是安全、有效的,同传统经皮肾镜相比,具有对病人创伤小,易恢复等优点。     

输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的疗效观察

目的探讨输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的临床效果。方法选择2018年1月～2019年6月在我院行输尿管上段结石及肾结石治疗的70例患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法进行分组,每组35例。A组采用经皮肾镜碎石术,B组行输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术,观察比较两组患者结石清除率及手术情况(包括手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量)。结果两组患者的结石清除率比较,A组为91.43%、B组为94.29%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。B组患者的手术时间、住院时间均短于A组,手术出血量少于A组,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论经皮肾镜碎石术与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术的疗效相近,但输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术的手术时间短,患者恢复快。     

侧卧体位下经皮肾穿刺取石术联合经尿道输尿管镜取石术治疗复杂上尿路结石的临床应用价值

目的：探讨侧卧体位下经皮肾穿刺取石术联合经尿道输尿管镜取石术治疗复杂上尿路结石的可行性及临床应用价值。方法：回顾性分析2009年8月至2011年9月我院采用侧卧体住下经皮肾穿刺取石术联合经尿道输尿管镜取石术治疗复杂上尿路结石患者52例的临床资料：患者同时存在肾脏铸型结石或多发结石和或输尿管上段结石,单个结石最大径8-30mm。结果：平均手术时间60分钟（50—120分钟）;术前血红蛋白116±30g／L,术后第一天复查105±26g／L,无大出血需要输血病例;一次结石取净率为86．5％（45／52）,总取净率为92．3％（48／52）。结论：侧卧体位下经皮肾穿刺取石术及经尿道输尿管镜取石术两种术式联合应用具有可行性及互补性,在预防及减少术中出血、获得清晰的手术视野、减少灌注液外渗、增加结石清除速度及碎石成功率、缩短手术时间、减少术后发热等方面疗效显著,为治疗复杂上尿路结石提供了一个可行的新方法。     

微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石

目的:分析微创经皮肾镜碎石术(minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy,mPCNL)治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的临床疗效.方法:采用B超或X线定位,mPCNL治疗102例嵌顿性输尿管上段结石,其中2例经皮穿刺抽吸脓性尿液,留置造瘘管,抗炎治疗后二期手术.术后生命体征、B超和尿路平片(kindey ureter bladder,KUB)等检查并随访.结果:100例Ⅰ期穿刺成功并气压弹道或钬激光mPCNL,手术时间55-75 min.碎石、取石时间15-35 min.术后住院4-7 d.无穿刺损伤腹腔脏器、术中未有肾孟穿孔和输尿管损伤、无大出血等术中和术后并发症.mPCNL术后2 dKUB检查结石清除率为91.1%(93/102),9例残留结石,术后辅以体外冲击波碎石治疗.术后1个月结石清除率为100%(102/102).结论:微创经皮肾穿刺取石治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石创伤小、恢复快且有很高的清除率,值得临床推广应用.     

妊娠合并上尿路结石致肾绞痛的临床诊治策略

目的:探讨妊娠期上尿路结石致肾绞痛的诊断和治疗方法.方法:对103例妊娠期上尿路结石致肾绞痛患者的临床资料及诊治过程进行分析,结合文献讨论本病的临床特点及诊治方法.结果:92例B型超声检查发现结石,11例仅发现患侧肾脏积水.所有患者均先行保守治疗;期间14例行输尿管置管术,7例行输尿管镜下气压弹道碎石术,2例行经皮肾穿刺造瘘术;101例患者顺利足月分娩;2例终止妊娠,孕妇平安.结论:妊娠期上尿路结石的诊断首选超声检查.对于有症状发作者保守治疗是主要治疗方法.治疗用药物应注意保护胎儿.对于顽固性肾绞痛患者,外科治疗首选逆行插管引流尿液,必要时可选择输尿管镜检查或经皮肾穿刺.开放手术为最后的治疗手段.     

输尿管软镜治疗小儿上尿路结石的疗效及对血清炎症因子的影响

目的:探讨输尿管软镜治疗小儿上尿路结石的疗效及对血清炎症因子的影响。方法:选择2013年4月至2016年4月我院收治的上尿路结石患儿60例,通过随机数表法分为观察组(n=30)和对照组(n=30),对照组给予经皮肾镜激光碎石,观察组采用输尿管软镜取石术进行治疗。观察记录两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、住院天数及疼痛评分;比较两组患者白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞(WBC)水平、并发症发生情况及结石的清除率。结果:观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数以及疼痛评分均低于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患儿术前IL-10、CRP及WBC水平无明显差异;术后两组患儿各项炎性因子均明显增加(P0.05),观察者患儿IL-10、CRP及WBC水平显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);术后,观察组患者并发症总发生率为6.67%,明显低于对照组的33.33%,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者结石清除率无明显差异(P0.05)。结论:输尿管软镜取石术治疗上尿路结石安全有效、创伤小、并发症少,患者产生的应激反应小,值得临床推广和应用。     

后腹腔镜治疗输尿管上段结石42例临床分析

目的 探讨后腹腔镜输尿管上段切开取石术的技术要点和临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析后腹腔镜治疗输尿管上段结石42例临床资料.结果 41例患者手术取石成功,1例单侧2个结石,近端结石因患者体位改变上移至肾盂,后经ESWL治疗排出.术后随访6～12月,经B超复查患侧肾输尿管积水均明显好转.结论 后腹腔镜输尿管上段切开取石术是一种安全有效的微创技术,可作为开放手术或其他微创方法的替代或补充.     

微通道经皮肾镜取石术和标准通道经皮肾镜取石术的临床对比研究

目的：比较微通道经皮肾镜取石术和标准通道经皮肾镜取石术的临床效果。方法：选取2010 年1 月至2014 年5 月我院收 治的118 例肾结石患者,根据治疗方案分为微通道经皮肾镜取石术（MPCNL）（M 组,62 例）和标准通道经皮肾镜取石术（SPCNL） （S组,56 例）,比较两组术中术后相关指标和并发症情况。结果：与S 组相比,M组的手术时间更长,冲水量更多,但手术中出血量 更少,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;M 组术后血肌酐(Scr)、住院时间、卧床时间以及术后费用均小于或短于S 组,差异有统计学意 义（P<0.05）;两组结石清除率没有显著差异（P>0.05）;两组术后发热、出血、介入栓塞、结合穿孔、脓毒血症等并发症比较差异无统 计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：行MPCNL患者相比行SPCNL患者术后效果更好,临床上可根据结石的大小选择手术类型。     

80例血液透析患者上尿路结石患病率及危险因素分析

摘要 目的：分析血液透析患者上尿路结石的患病率及其危险因素,为早期干预提供依据。方法：回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年12月我院肾内科收治的CKD 5期持续性血液透析患者（血液透析组）上尿路结石的患病情况,并与健康体检者80名（对照组,n=80）、CKD1~3期患者（非血液透析组,n=80）进行比较。比较血液透析患者中结石和非结石者人口学资料、血清白蛋白、血糖、血脂、肾功能等生化指标,并记录二者透析时间及24 h尿量。采用多因素logistic回归分析上尿路结石的患病情况的危险因素。结果：血液透析组上尿路结石患病率为25.0%,显著高于非血液透析组13.8%、对照组10.0%(P<0.05);非血液透析组、对照组上尿路结石患病率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结石与非结石患者在性别、透析时间、TG、TC、UA、ALB、24 h尿量方面比较,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。多因素logistic回归分析显示,透析时间、UA、TC是血液透析患者发生上尿路结石的独立危险因素,而ALB则是保护性因素（P<0.05）。结论：血液透析患者上尿路结石的患病率较高,对血脂代谢异常、高血UA、低血清ALB及长期透析者应早期筛查,并纠正脂代谢紊乱和低蛋白血症。     

微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜碎石取石术对输尿管上段结石患者血液流变学及男性性功能指标的影响

摘要 目的：以血液流变学及男性性功能指标为主要观察指标分析微通道经皮肾镜取石术（MPCNL）与输尿管软镜碎石取石术（FURL）在输尿管上段结石（UUC）中的应用价值。方法：将80例男性UUC患者按简单随机化法分MPCNL组、FURL组各40例;比较两组清石率、血液流变学、性功能指标及不良反应。结果：两组术后1w（82.50% vs 85.00%）、术后1mo（92.50% vs 97.50%）、术后3mo（100.00% vs 100.00%）的清石率无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。FURL组术后1天、术后7天的血液流变学指标水平均低于MPCNL组（P＜0.05）。两组术后男性性功能指标较术前显著改善,但FURL组术后3mo、6mo的男性性功能指标改善更显著（P＜0.05）。结论：对于UUC患者,MPCNL和FURL均能有效清除结石,都是安全有效的方法,但FURL较MPCNL对患者术后血液流变学的影响更小,且更利于术后性功能的恢复。     

微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗感染性结石合并尿液CRPA感染两例

目的:总结一期行微通道经皮肾镜碎石术(microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotripsy,m PCNL)治疗上尿路感染性结石合并尿培养为耐碳青霉烯铜绿假单胞菌(carbapenem resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa,CRPA)的经验。方法:选择我院收治两例左肾结石合并尿培养为CRPA的患者,经积极抗感染治疗后,病例一行左侧经皮肾镜碎石术,病例二先行右肾穿刺造瘘术成功后行左侧经皮肾镜碎石术,观察分析两例患者术后结石清除情况,术中术后出现发热、腰痛、大出血、尿路损伤及肾功能衰竭等并发症情况。结果:两例患者术后复查双J管位置良好,结石基本清除;术中、术后均未出现发热、腰痛、大出血、尿路损伤及肾功能衰竭等并发症。结论:经过合适的围手术期处理,一期微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗感染性结石合并尿培养为耐药菌的患者是安全可行的。     

钙敏感受体(CaSR)基因986、990多态性与尿石症的相关性研究

目的:探讨钙敏感受体(Ca SR)基因单核昔酸多态性与泌尿系结石的关系。方法:选取90例黑龙江地区的泌尿系结石患者及90例健康对照者外周血标本中的基因组DNA,采用PCR(聚合酶链反应)结合DNA测序,检测并分析Ca SR基因的单核苷酸多态性位点的分布。结果:泌尿系结石组和对照组Ca SR基因第986位、990位频率分布符合Hardy-Weinberg定律,其基因型分布频率在泌尿系结石患者和健康对照者中差异无统计学意义(P0.05),但在泌尿系结石患者组内Ca SR第990位GG纯合子和RG杂合子出现频率明显偏高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:Ca SR基因第7外显子第986、990多态性位点与泌尿系结石的形成无直接相关性,但第7外显子第990位A/G单核苷酸多态性可能与泌尿系结石的形成密切相关。     

Ultrasonic Destruction of Kidney Stones

Kidney stones may be removed without using a surgical incision by a combination of techniques and skills recently developed in the fields of urology and radiology. Percutaneous access to the kidney is established under fluoroscopic control. A guide wire placed into the renal pelvis allows a nephroscope to be inserted and the collecting system visualized. A long hollow metal probe is advanced through the nephroscope and placed in contact with the stone. This probe conducts the ultrasonic energy. The stone absorbs the energy and breaks into fine granules, which are evacuated by suction.Twenty-three consecutively seen patients presenting with 27 upper urinary tract calculi for which removal was indicated underwent successful percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy. Fifteen stones were located in the renal pelvis, eight in a calix, three at the ureteropelvic junction and one in the upper ureter. One infected staghorn calculus was removed. Two complications resulted in extended hospital stays, but in no patients were surgical incisions required. Of the 23 patients, 9 had previously had a surgical lithotomy. The authors believe that most renal and upper ureteral calculi for which removal is indicated may be extracted percutaneously with the aid of the ultrasonic lithotriptor. The patients may expect a rapid convalescence with diminished pain.     

Clinical comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating renal calculi.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for efficacy in treating renal calculi. DESIGN: Non-randomised multicentre cohort study with 3 month follow up and 13 month data collection period. SETTING: Lithotripter centre in London, tertiary referral hospital, and urological clinics in several secondary and tertiary care centres. PATIENTS: 933 of 1001 patients treated by lithotripsy at the lithotripter centre were compared with 195 treated by nephrolithotomy. Missing patients were due to incomplete collection of data. Age and sex distributions and characteristics of the stones were similar in the two treatment groups. Two patients died in the lithotripsy group. Three month follow up was achieved in about 84% of both groups (783/933 for lithotripsy; 163/195 for nephrolithotomy). INTERVENTIONS: The nephrolithotomy group had surgical nephrolithotomy alone. In the lithotripsy group 83% (774/933) had lithotripsy alone, 11% (103/933) had combined lithotripsy and nephrolithotomy, and 6% (56/933) had lithotripsy plus ureteroscopy. Single and combined lithotripter treatments were analysed as one group and compared with nephrolithotomy. END POINT: Presence of stones three months after treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Presence of residual stones was assessed by plain radiography, ultrasonography, or intravenous urography. After adjustment for age and size and position of stone for patients with single stones the likelihood of being free of stones three months after treatment was significantly greater in the nephrolithotomy group than the lithotripsy group (odds ratio 6.6; 95% confidence interval 3.0 to 14.6) and the response was particularly pronounced with staghorn calculi (62% (8/13) v 15% (141/96) patients free of stones after nephrolithotomy and lithotripsy, respectively). OTHER FINDINGS: 19%(146/775) of patients who had had lithotripsy had to be readmitted within three months after treatment compared with 14%(23/162) who had nephrolithotomy; and 64%(94/146) of readmissions after lithotripsy were for complications compared with 30%(7/23) of readmissions after nephrolithotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrolithotomy may be preferable to lithotripsy for treating renal stones and it may not be wise to invest heavily in lithotripsy facilities.     

Adjunctive Medical Therapy with α-Blocker after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Although some trials assessed the efficacy and safety of the α-blocker in facilitating renal and ureteral stones expulsion after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), the role of the α-blocker in facilitating upper urinary calculi expulsion after ESWL remain controversial.

Aims

To determine the efficacy and safety of the α-blocker in facilitating renal and ureteral stones expulsion after ESWL.

Methods

A literature search was carried out using the PubMed database, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database to identify relevant studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Pooled effect estimates were obtained using a fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

The meta-analysis included 23 RCTs, α-blocker significantly enhanced expulsion rate of upper urinary tract calculi after ESWL (P<0.00001; RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.12–1.31), significantly promoted steinstrasse expulsion (P=0.03; RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.03–1.53), significantly shortened the discharge time of upper urinary tract calculi (P=0.0001; MD -2.12; 95% CI -3.20–-1.04), significantly reduced the patient''s pain VAS score (P=0.001; RR -1.0; 95% CI -1.61–-0.39). Compared with the control group, dizziness (P=0.002; RR 5.48; 95% CI 1.91–15.77), anejaculation (P=0.02; RR 12.17; 95% CI 1.61–91.99) and headache (P=0.04; RR 4.03; 95% CI 1.04–15.72) in the α-blocker group was associated with a higher incidence.

Conclusions

Treatment with α-blocker after ESWL appears to be effective in enhancing expulsion rate of upper urinary tract calculi, shortening the discharge time of upper urinary tract calculi, reducing the patient''s pain. The side effects of α-blocker were light and few.     

排石汤联合盐酸坦洛新辅助体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效分析

目的:探讨排石汤联合盐酸坦洛新辅助体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效。方法:选择我院2015年1月~2016年9月收治的120例上尿路结石患者,采取随机数字表将其分成两组,每组60例。两组患者均行ESWL治疗,并于术后辅助使用盐酸坦洛新,观察组在上述治疗基础上联合排石汤治疗,对比两组的临床疗效以及治疗前后血清肌酐(Scr)、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关载脂蛋白(NGAL)、半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C(Cys-C)、肾小球滤过率(GFR)水平的变化情况。结果:观察组总有效率为96.60%,对照组为86.67%,观察组总有效率明显高于对照组(P0.05)。观察组结石排净率为95.00%,明显高于对照组(P0.05);肾绞痛发生率为6.67%,明显低于对照组(P0.05),结石排出时间、血尿持续时间均显著短于对照组(P0.01)。两组1年复发率对比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者术后2 h、1 d血清NGAL、Cys-C水平逐渐升高,GFR逐渐下降,术后3 d上述指标逐渐恢复。观察组术后1 d、3 d NGAL、Cys-C水平明显低于对照组,GFR明显高于对照组(P0.01)。两组术前术后各时点Scr比较差异均无明显统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:排石汤联合盐酸坦洛新辅助ESWL治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效显著,并可有效改善ESWL引起的肾损伤。     

输尿管软镜结合输尿管硬镜治疗复杂上尿路结石的效果评价及对预后的影响

目的 探讨输尿管软镜协同输尿管硬镜治疗复杂上尿路结石的临床效果.方法 选择我院收治的复杂上尿路结石患者96例,按入院顺序分为对照组和观察组,每组48例.对照组采取输尿管硬镜钬激光碎石术治疗,观察组采取输尿管软镜协同输尿管硬镜钬激光碎石术治疗.比较两组患者1次性碎石成功率、结石彻底清除率、炎症反应情况以及生活质量、住院时...