Genetic and Physical Interactions between Gα Subunits and Components of the Gβγ Dimer of Heterotrimeric G Proteins in Neurospora crassa

Heterotrimeric G proteins are critical regulators of growth and asexual and sexual development in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Three Gα subunits (GNA-1, GNA-2, and GNA-3), one Gβ subunit (GNB-1), and one Gγ subunit (GNG-1) have been functionally characterized, but genetic epistasis relationships between Gβ and Gα subunit genes have not been determined. Physical association between GNB-1 and FLAG-tagged GNG-1 has been previously demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation, but knowledge of the Gα binding partners for the Gβγ dimer is currently lacking. In this study, the three N. crassa Gα subunits are analyzed for genetic epistasis with gnb-1 and for physical interaction with the Gβγ dimer. We created double mutants lacking one Gα gene and gnb-1 and introduced constitutively active, GTPase-deficient alleles for each Gα gene into the Δgnb-1 background. Genetic analysis revealed that gna-3 is epistatic to gnb-1 with regard to negative control of submerged conidiation. gnb-1 is epistatic to gna-2 and gna-3 for aerial hyphal height, while gnb-1 appears to act upstream of gna-1 and gna-2 during aerial conidiation. None of the activated Gα alleles restored female fertility to Δgnb-1 mutants, and the gna-3^Q208L allele inhibited formation of female reproductive structures, consistent with a need for Gα proteins to cycle through the inactive GDP-bound form for these processes. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments using extracts from the gng-1-FLAG strain demonstrated that the three Gα proteins interact with the Gβγ dimer. The finding that the Gβγ dimer interacts with all three Gα proteins is supported by epistasis between gnb-1 and gna-1, gna-2, and gna-3 for at least one function.     

The products from papain and pepsin hydrolyses of guinea-pig immunoglobulins γ1G and γ2G

1. The products from papain and pepsin hydrolyses of the guinea-pig immunoglobulins gamma(1)G and gamma(2)G were isolated and characterized with regard to molecular weight, amino acid composition, hexose content and antigenic specificity. 2. Fragments Fab and (Fab')(2) from immunoglobulins gamma(1)G and gamma(2)G have similar electrophoretic and antigenic properties, but show some class-specific differences in amino acid composition. 3. Three Fc fragments were obtained after papain digestion of immunoglobulin gamma(2)G, namely, fragment Fc dimer (mol.wt. 58000), fragment Fc monomer (mol.wt. 29000) and fragment Fc' (mol.wt. 8000). A single crystalline fragment, namely fragment Fc' (mol.wt. 11000), was isolated after papain digestion of immunoglobulin gamma(1)G. 4. Peptic digestion of immunoglobulins gamma(1)G and gamma(2)G releases C-terminal fragments, namely, fragments pFc', of similar molecular weight (13000) but different amino acid compositions and distinct antigenic specificities. 5. Digestion-time studies show that immunoglobulin gamma(1)G is far more susceptible to proteolysis than is immunoglobulin gamma(2)G and suggest that at least a proportion of molecules are split primarily at a site that liberates fragment gamma(1)Fc'.     

Gβγ SNARE Interactions and Their Behavioral Effects

Presynaptic terminals possess interlocking molecular mechanisms that control exocytosis. An example of such complexity is the modulation of release by presynaptic G Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs). GPCR ubiquity at synapses—GPCRs are present at every studied presynaptic terminal—underlies their critical importance in synaptic function. GPCRs mediate presynaptic modulation by mechanisms including via classical Gα effectors, but membrane-delimited actions of Gβγ can also alter probability of release by altering presynaptic ionic conductances. This directly or indirectly modifies action potential-evoked presynaptic Ca²⁺ entry. In addition, Gβγ can interact directly with SNARE complexes responsible for synaptic vesicle fusion to reduce peak cleft neurotransmitter concentrations during evoked release. The interaction of Gβγ with SNARE is displaced via competitive interaction with C2AB-domain containing calcium sensors such as synaptotagmin I in a Ca²⁺-sensitive manner, restoring exocytosis. Synaptic modulation of this form allows selective inhibition of postsynaptic receptor-mediated responses, and this, in combination with Ca²⁺ sensitivity of Gβγ effects on SNARE complexes allows for specific behavioral outcomes. One such outcome mediated by 5-HT receptors in the spinal cord seen in all vertebrates shows remarkable synergy between presynaptic effects of Gβγ and postsynaptic 5-HT-mediated changes in activation of Ca²⁺-dependent K⁺ channels. While acting through entirely separate cellular compartments and signal transduction pathways, these effects converge on the same effect on locomotion and other critical functions of the central nervous system.

     

Characterization of centromere arrangements and test for random distribution in G0, G1, S,G2, G1, and early S′ phase in human lymphocytes

Summary The arrangement of centromeres, cluster formation and association with the nucleolus and the nuclear membrane were characterized in human lymphocytes during the course of interphase in a cell-phase-dependent manner. We evaluated 3 893 cell nuclei categorized by five parameters. The centromeres were visualized by means of indirect immunofluorescent labeling with anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) contained in serum of patients with CREST syndrome. The cell nuclei were classified as G₀, G₁, S, G₂, Gl₁ and early S phase by comparing microscopically identified groups of cell nuclei with flow cytometric determination of cell cycle stage of synchronized and unsynchronized lymphocyte cell cultures. Based on a discrimination analysis, a program was devised that calculated the probability for any cell nucleus belonging to the G₀, G₁, S, G₂, G₁ and early S phase using only two microscopic parameters. Various characteristics were determined in the G₀, S, and G₂ stages. A transition stage to S phase within G₁ was detected. This stage shows centromere arrangements not repeated in later cell cycles and which develop from the dissolution of centromere clusters in the periphery of the nucleus during G₀ and G₁. S phase exhibits various non-random centromere arrangements and associations of centromeres with the nucleolus. G₁ and early S phase of the second cell cycle display no characteristic centromere arrangement. The duplication of centromeres in G₂ is asynchronous in two phases. For all cell phases a test for random distribution of the centromeres in the cell nucleus was performed. There is a distinct tendency for centromeres to be in a peripheral position during Go and G₁; this tendency becomes weaker in S phase. Although the visual impression is a seemingly random distribution of centromeres in G₂ and G₁ statistical analysis still demonstrates a significant deviation from random distribution in favor of a peripheral location. Only the early S phase of the second cell cycle shows no significant deviation from a random distribution.     

Complex formation and reciprocal regulation between GSK3β and C3G

GSK3β, a ubiquitously expressed Ser/Thr kinase, regulates cell metabolism, proliferation and differentiation. Its activity is spatially and temporally regulated dependent on external stimuli and interacting partners, and its deregulation is associated with various human disorders. In this study, we identify C3G (RapGEF1), a protein essential for mammalian embryonic development as an interacting partner and substrate of GSK3β. In vivo and in vitro interaction assays demonstrated that GSK3β and Akt are present in complex with C3G. Molecular modelling and mutational analysis identified a domain in C3G that aids interaction with GSK3β, and overlaps with its nuclear export sequence. GSK3β phosphorylates C3G on primed as well as unprimed sites, and regulates its subcellular localization. Over-expression of C3G resulted in activation of Akt and inactivation of GSK3β. Huntingtin aggregate formation, dependent on GSK3β inhibition, was enhanced upon C3G overexpression. Stable clones of C2C12 cells generated by CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockdown of C3G, that cannot differentiate, show reduced Akt activity and S9-GSK3β phosphorylation compared to wild type cells. Co-expression of catalytically active GSK3β inhibited C3G induced myocyte differentiation. C3G mutant defective for GSK3β phosphorylation, does not alter S9-GSK3β phosphorylation and, is compromised for inducing myocyte differentiation. Our results show complex formation and reciprocal regulation between GSK3β and C3G. We have identified a novel function of C3G as a negative regulator of GSK3β, a property important for its ability to induce myogenic differentiation.     

Cloning and functional analysis of the Gβ gene Mgb1 and the Gγ gene Mgg1 in Monascus ruber

The ascomycetous fungus Monascus ruber is one of the most well-known species widely used to produce Monascus-fermentation products for natural food colorants and medicine. Our previous research on the Gα subunit Mga1 and the regulator of G protein signaling MrflbA indicated that heterotrimeric G protein signaling pathways were involved in aspects of growth, sporulation and secondary metabolite production in M. ruber. To better understand the G protein signaling pathways in this fungus, a Gβ subunit gene (Mgb1) and a GΓ subunit gene (Mgg1) were cloned and investigated in the current study. The predicted Mgb1 protein consisted of 353 amino acids and Mgg1 consisted of 94 amino acids, sharing marked similarity with Aspergillus Gβ and GΓ subunits, respectively. Targeted deletion (Δ) of Mgb1 or Mgg1 resulted in phenotypic alterations similar to those resulting from ΔMga1, i.e., restricted vegetative growth, lowered asexual sporulation, impaired cleistothecial formation, and enhanced citrinin and pigment production. Moreover, deletion of Mgg1 suppressed the defects in asexual development and in biosynthesis of citrinin and pigment caused by the absence of MrflbA function. These results provide evidence that Mgb1 and Mgg1 form a functional GβΓ dimer and the dimer interacts with Mga1 to mediate signaling pathways, which are negatively controlled by MrflbA, for growth, reproduction and citrinin and pigment biosynthesis in M. ruber.     

Palmitoylation and membrane cholesterol stabilize μ-opioid receptor homodimerization and G protein coupling

Background

A cholesterol-palmitoyl interaction has been reported to occur in the dimeric interface of the ??₂-adrenergic receptor crystal structure. We sought to investigate whether a similar phenomenon could be observed with ??-opioid receptor (OPRM1), and if so, to assess the role of cholesterol in this class of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling.

Results

C3.55(170) was determined to be the palmitoylation site of OPRM1. Mutation of this Cys to Ala did not affect the binding of agonists, but attenuated receptor signaling and decreased cholesterol associated with the receptor signaling complex. In addition, both attenuation of receptor palmitoylation (by mutation of C3.55[170] to Ala) and inhibition of cholesterol synthesis (by treating the cells with simvastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor) impaired receptor signaling, possibly by decreasing receptor homodimerization and G??i2 coupling; this was demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence colocalization and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analyses. A computational model of the OPRM1 homodimer structure indicated that a specific cholesterol-palmitoyl interaction can facilitate OPRM1 homodimerization at the TMH4-TMH4 interface.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that C3.55(170) is the palmitoylation site of OPRM1 and identify a cholesterol-palmitoyl interaction in the OPRM1 complex. Our findings suggest that this interaction contributes to OPRM1 signaling by facilitating receptor homodimerization and G protein coupling. This conclusion is supported by computational modeling of the OPRM1 homodimer.     

A complex interplay of Gβ and Gγ proteins regulates plant growth and defence traits in the allotetraploid Brassica juncea

Plant Molecular Biology - Gene expression analysis coupled with in-planta studies showed that specific Gβγ combination regulates plant growth and defence traits in the allotetraploid...     

Therapeutic potential of β-arrestin- and G protein-biased agonists

Members of the seven-transmembrane receptor (7TMR), or G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), superfamily represent some of the most successful targets of modern drug therapy, with proven efficacy in the treatment of a broad range of human conditions and disease processes. It is now appreciated that β-arrestins, once viewed simply as negative regulators of traditional 7TMR-stimulated G protein signaling, act as multifunctional adapter proteins that regulate 7TMR desensitization and trafficking and promote distinct intracellular signals in their own right. Moreover, several 7TMR biased agonists, which selectively activate these divergent signaling pathways, have been identified. Here we highlight the diversity of G protein- and β-arrestin-mediated functions and the therapeutic potential of selective targeting of these in disease states.     

A biased ligand for OXE-R uncouples Gα and Gβγ signaling within a heterotrimer

Differential targeting of heterotrimeric G protein versus β-arrestin signaling are emerging concepts in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) research and drug discovery, and biased engagement by GPCR ligands of either β-arrestin or G protein pathways has been disclosed. Herein we report on a new mechanism of ligand bias to titrate the signaling specificity of a cell-surface GPCR. Using a combination of biomolecular and virtual screening, we identified the small-molecule modulator Gue1654, which inhibits Gβγ but not Gα signaling triggered upon activation of Gα(i)-βγ by the chemoattractant receptor OXE-R in both recombinant and human primary cells. Gue1654 does not interfere nonspecifically with signaling directly at or downstream of Gβγ. This hitherto unappreciated mechanism of ligand bias at a GPCR highlights both a new paradigm for functional selectivity and a potentially new strategy to develop pathway-specific therapeutics.     

TNF promoter ?308 A/G and ?238 A/G polymorphisms and juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to determine whether the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) promoter polymorphisms confer susceptibility to juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). A meta-analysis was conducted on the A allele of the TNF -308 A/G and -238 A/G polymorphisms. The nine comparison studies including 1,132 JIA patients and 1,663 controls were included in the meta-analysis and consisted of 7 European, 1 Mexican, and 1 Turkish population. No association was found between JIA and the TNF -308 A allele and the TNF -238 A allele (odds ratio [OR] = 1.211, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.917-1.598, P = 0.177; OR = 1.135, 95 % CI = 0.603-1.861, P = 0.615, respectively). Stratification by ethnicity did not show the association of the TNF -308 and -238 polymorphisms with JIA in Europeans. Mexicans were found to have lower prevalences of A alleles (2.9, 4.1 %) of the TNF -308 A/G and -238 A/G polymorphisms than any other population studied, and the Turkish population the highest (31.2, 26.9 %). This meta-analysis shows no association between the A alleles of the TNF -308 A/G or -238 A/G polymorphisms and JIA in Europeans, but that the prevalences of these alleles are ethnicity dependent.     

Gβγ interacts with mTOR and promotes its activation

Diverse G protein-coupled receptors depend on Gβγ heterodimers to promote cell polarization and survival via direct activation of PI3Kγ and potentially other effectors. These events involve full activation of AKT via its phosphorylation at Ser473, suggesting that mTORC2, the kinase that phosphorylates AKT at Ser473, is activated downstream of Gβγ. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that Gβγ directly contributes to mTOR signaling. Here, we demonstrate that endogenous mTOR interacts with Gβγ. Cell stimulation with serum modulates Gβγ interaction with mTOR. The carboxyl terminal region of mTOR, expressed as a GST-fusion protein, including the serine/threonine kinase domain, binds Gβγ heterodimers containing different Gβ subunits, except Gβ₄. Both, mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes interact with Gβ₁γ₂ which promotes phosphorylation of their respective substrates, p70S6K and AKT. In addition, chronic treatment with rapamycin, a condition known to interfere with assembly of mTORC2, reduces the interaction between Gβγ and mTOR and the phosphorylation of AKT; whereas overexpression of Gαi interfered with the effect of Gβγ as promoter of p70S6K and AKT phosphorylation. Altogether, our results suggest that Gβγ positively regulates mTOR signaling via direct interactions and provide further support to emerging strategies based on the therapeutical potential of inhibiting different Gβγ signaling interfaces.     

The heterotrimeric G protein subunits Gα(q) and Gβ(1) have lysophospholipase D activity

In a previous study we purified a novel lysoPLD (lysophospholipase D) which converts LPC (lysophosphatidylcholine) into a bioactive phospholipid, LPA (lysophosphatidic acid), from the rat brain. In the present study, we identified the purified 42 and 35 kDa proteins as the heterotrimeric G protein subunits Gα(q) and Gβ(1) respectively. When FLAG-tagged Gα(q) or Gβ(1) was expressed in cells and purified, significant lysoPLD activity was observed in the microsomal fractions. Levels of the hydrolysed product choline increased over time, and the Mg(2+) dependency and substrate specificity of Gα(q) were similar to those of lysoPLD purified from the rat brain. Mutation of Gα(q) at amino acids Lys(52), Thr(186) or Asp(205), residues that are predicted to interact with nucleotide phosphates or catalytic Mg(2+), dramatically reduced lysoPLD activity. GTP does not compete with LPC for the lysoPLD activity, indicating that these substrate-binding sites are not identical. Whereas the enzyme activity of highly purified FLAG-tagged Gα(q) overexpressed in COS-7 cells was ~4 nmol/min per mg, the activity from Neuro2A cells was 137.4 nmol/min per mg. The calculated K(m) and V(max) values for lysoPAF (1-O-hexadecyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) obtained from Neuro2A cells were 21 μM and 0.16 μmol/min per mg respectively, similar to the enzyme purified from the rat brain. These results reveal a new function for Gα(q) and Gβ(1) as an enzyme with lysoPLD activity. Tag-purified Gα(11) also exhibited a high lysoPLD activity, but Gα(i) and Gα(s) did not. The lysoPLD activity of the Gα subunit is strictly dependent on its subfamily and might be important for cellular responses. However, treatment of Hepa-1 cells with Gα(q) and Gα(11) siRNAs (small interfering RNAs) did not change lysoPLD activity in the microsomal fraction. Clarification of the physiological relevance of lysoPLD activity of these proteins will need further studies.     

Membrane-Localized Extra-Large G Proteins and Gβγ of the Heterotrimeric G Proteins Form Functional Complexes Engaged in Plant Immunity in Arabidopsis

In animals, heterotrimeric G proteins, comprising Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are molecular switches whose function tightly depends on Gα and Gβγ interaction. Intriguingly, in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), multiple defense responses involve Gβγ, but not Gα. We report here that the Gβγ dimer directly partners with extra-large G proteins (XLGs) to mediate plant immunity. Arabidopsis mutants deficient in XLGs, Gβ, and Gγ are similarly compromised in several pathogen defense responses, including disease development and production of reactive oxygen species. Genetic analysis of double, triple, and quadruple mutants confirmed that XLGs and Gβγ functionally interact in the same defense signaling pathways. In addition, mutations in XLG2 suppressed the seedling lethal and cell death phenotypes of BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-associated receptor kinase1-interacting receptor-like kinase1 mutants in an identical way as reported for Arabidopsis Gβ-deficient mutants. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) three-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescent complementation assays revealed that XLG2 physically interacts with all three possible Gβγ dimers at the plasma membrane. Phylogenetic analysis indicated a close relationship between XLGs and plant Gα subunits, placing the divergence point at the dawn of land plant evolution. Based on these findings, we conclude that XLGs form functional complexes with Gβγ dimers, although the mechanism of action of these complexes, including activation/deactivation, must be radically different form the one used by the canonical Gα subunit and are not likely to share the same receptors. Accordingly, XLGs expand the repertoire of heterotrimeric G proteins in plants and reveal a higher level of diversity in heterotrimeric G protein signaling.Heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins), classically consisting of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are essential signal transduction elements in most eukaryotes. In animals and fungi, ligand perception by G protein-coupled receptors leads to replacement of GDP with GTP in Gα, triggering activation of the heterotrimer (Li et al., 2007; Oldham and Hamm, 2008). Upon activation, GTP-bound Gα and Gβγ are released and interact with downstream effectors, thereby transmitting signals to multiple intracellular signaling cascades. Signaling terminates when the intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα hydrolyzes GTP to GDP and the inactive heterotrimer reforms at the receptor. The large diversity of mammalian Gα subunits confers specificity to the multiple signaling pathways mediated by G proteins (Wettschureck and Offermanns, 2005). Five distinct classes of Gα have been described in animals (Gαi, Gαq, Gαs, Gα12 and Gαv), with orthologs found in evolutionarily primitive organisms such as sponges (Oka et al., 2009). Humans possess four classes of Gα involving 23 functional isoforms encoded by 16 genes (McCudden et al., 2005), while only a single prototypical Gα is usually found per plant genome (Urano et al., 2013). Multiple copies of Gα are present in some species with recently duplicated genomes, such as soybean (Glycine max) with four Gα genes (Blanc and Wolfe, 2004; Bisht et al., 2011). In the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), a prototypical Gα subunit (GPA1) is involved in a number of important processes, including cell proliferation (Ullah et al., 2001), inhibition of inward K⁺ channels and activation of anion channels in guard cells by mediating the abscisic acid pathway (Wang et al., 2001; Coursol et al., 2003), blue light responses (Warpeha et al., 2006, 2007), and germination and postgermination development (Chen et al., 2006; Pandey et al., 2006).It is well established that heterotrimeric G proteins play a fundamental role in plant innate immunity. In Arabidopsis, two different Gβγ dimers (Gβγ1 and Gβγ2) are generally considered to be the predominant elements in G protein defense signaling against a variety of fungal pathogens (Llorente et al., 2005; Trusov et al., 2006, 2007, 2009; Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012; Torres et al., 2013). By contrast, these studies attributed a small or no role to Gα, because mutants deficient in Gα displayed only slightly increased resistance against the fungal pathogens (Llorente et al., 2005; Trusov et al., 2006; Torres et al., 2013). The Gβγ-mediated signaling also contributes to defense against a model bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, by participating in programmed cell death (PCD) and inducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in response to at least three pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs; Ishikawa, 2009; Liu et al., 2013; Torres et al., 2013). Gα is not involved in PCD or PAMP-triggered ROS production (Liu et al., 2013; Torres et al., 2013). Nonetheless, Arabidopsis Gα plays a positive role in defense against P. syringae, probably by mediating stomatal function and hence physically restricting bacterial entry to the leaf interior (Zhang et al., 2008; Zeng and He, 2010; Lee et al., 2013). Given the small contribution from Gα, the involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins in Arabidopsis resistance could be explained in two ways: either the Gβγ dimer acts independently from Gα, raising a question of how is it activated upon a pathogen attack, or Gα is replaced by another protein for heterotrimer formation.The Arabidopsis genome contains at least three genes encoding Gα-like proteins that have been classified as extra-large G proteins (XLGs; Lee and Assmann, 1999; Ding et al., 2008). XLGs comprise two structurally distinct regions. The C-terminal region is similar to the canonical Gα, containing the conserved helical and GTPase domains, while the N-terminal region is a stretch of approximately 400 amino acids including a putative nuclear localization signal (Ding et al., 2008). GTP binding and hydrolysis were confirmed for all three XLG proteins, although their enzymatic activities are very slow and require Ca²⁺ as a cofactor, whereas canonical Gα utilizes Mg²⁺ (Heo et al., 2012). Several other features differentiate XLGs from Gα subunits. Comparative analysis of XLG1 and Gα at the DNA level showed that the genes are organized in seven and 13 exons, respectively, without common splicing sites (Lee and Assmann, 1999). XLGs have been reported to localize to the nucleus (Ding et al., 2008). Analysis of knockout mutants revealed a nuclear function for XLG2, as it physically interacts with the Related To Vernalization1 (RTV1) protein, enhancing the DNA binding activity of RTV1 to floral integrator gene promoters and resulting in flowering initiation (Heo et al., 2012). Therefore, it appears that XLGs may act independently of G protein signaling. On the other hand, functional similarities between XLGs and the Arabidopsis Gβ subunit (AGB1) were also discovered. For instance, XLG3- and Gβ-deficient mutants were similarly impaired in root gravitropic responses (Pandey et al., 2008). Knockout of all three XLG genes caused increased root length, similarly to the Gβ-deficient mutant (Ding et al., 2008). Furthermore, as observed in Gβ-deficient mutants, xlg2 mutants displayed increased susceptibility to P. syringae, indicating a role in plant defense (Zhu et al., 2009). Nevertheless, a genetic analysis of the possible functional interaction between XLGs and Gβ has not been established.In this report, we performed in-depth genetic analyses to test the functional interaction between the three XLGs and Gβγ dimers during defense-related responses in Arabidopsis. We also examined physical interaction between XLG2 and the Gβγ dimers using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) three-hybrid (Y3H) and bimolecular fluorescent complementation (BiFC) assays. Our findings indicate that XLGs function as direct partners of Gβγ dimers in plant defense signaling. To estimate relatedness of XLGs and Gα proteins, we carried out a phylogenetic analysis. Based on our findings, we conclude that plant XLG proteins most probably originated from a canonical Gα subunit and retained prototypical interaction with Gβγ dimers. They function together with Gβγ in a number of processes including plant defense, although they most probably evolved activation/deactivation mechanisms very different from those of a prototypical Gα.     

G��i and G�¦� Jointly Regulate the Conformations of a G�¦� Effector, the Neuronal G Protein-activated K+ Channel (GIRK)

Stable complexes among G proteins and effectors are an emerging concept in cell signaling. The prototypical Gβγ effector G protein-activated K⁺ channel (GIRK; Kir3) physically interacts with Gβγ but also with Gα_i/o. Whether and how Gα_i/o subunits regulate GIRK in vivo is unclear. We studied triple interactions among GIRK subunits 1 and 2, Gα_i3 and Gβγ. We used in vitro protein interaction assays and in vivo intramolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (i-FRET) between fluorophores attached to N and C termini of either GIRK1 or GIRK2 subunit. We demonstrate, for the first time, that Gβγ and Gα_i3 distinctly and interdependently alter the conformational states of the heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel. Biochemical experiments show that Gβγ greatly enhances the binding of GIRK1 subunit to Gα_i3^GDP and, unexpectedly, to Gα_i3^GTP. i-FRET showed that both Gα_i3 and Gβγ induced distinct conformational changes in GIRK1 and GIRK2. Moreover, GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits assumed unique, distinct conformations when coexpressed with a “constitutively active” Gα_i3 mutant and Gβγ together. These conformations differ from those assumed by GIRK1 or GIRK2 after separate coexpression of either Gα_i3 or Gβγ. Both biochemical and i-FRET data suggest that GIRK acts as the nucleator of the GIRK-Gα-Gβγ signaling complex and mediates allosteric interactions between Gα_i^GTP and Gβγ. Our findings imply that Gα_i/o and the Gα_iβγ heterotrimer can regulate a Gβγ effector both before and after activation by neurotransmitters.     

Myristoylation exerts direct and allosteric effects on Gα conformation and dynamics in solution

Coupling of heterotrimeric G proteins to activated G protein-coupled receptors results in nucleotide exchange on the Gα subunit, which in turn decreases its affinity for both Gβγ and activated receptors. N-Terminal myristoylation of Gα subunits aids in membrane localization of inactive G proteins. Despite the presence of the covalently attached myristoyl group, Gα proteins are highly soluble after GTP binding. This study investigated factors facilitating the solubility of the activated, myristoylated protein. In doing so, we also identified myristoylation-dependent differences in regions of Gα known to play important roles in interactions with receptors, effectors, and nucleotide binding. Amide hydrogen-deuterium exchange and site-directed fluorescence of activated proteins revealed a solvent-protected amino terminus that was enhanced by myristoylation. Furthermore, fluorescence quenching confirmed that the myristoylated amino terminus is in proximity to the Switch II region in the activated protein. Myristoylation also stabilized the interaction between the guanine ring and the base of the α5 helix that contacts the bound nucleotide. The allosteric effects of myristoylation on protein structure, function, and localization indicate that the myristoylated amino terminus of Gα(i) functions as a myristoyl switch, with implications for myristoylation in the stabilization of nucleotide binding and in the spatial regulation of G protein signaling.     

Gαq,Gγ1 and Plc21C Control Drosophila Body Fat Storage

mobilization of body fat is essential for energy homeostasis in animals. In insects, the adipokinetic hormone （Akh） systemically controls body fat mobilization. Biochemical evidence supports that Akh signals via a G protein-coupled receptor （GPCR） called Akh receptor （AkhR） using cyclic-AMP （cAMP） and Ca2＋ second messengers to induce storage lipid release from fat body cells. Recently, we provided genetic evidence that the intracellular calcium （iCa2＋） level in fat storage cells controls adiposity in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. However, little is known about the genes, which mediate Akh signalling downstream of the AkhR to regulate changes in iCa2＋. Here, we used thermogenetics to provide in vivo evidence that the GPCR signal transducers G protein α q subunit （Gαq）, G protein γ1 （Gγ1） and Phospholipase C at 21C （Plc21C） control cellular and organismal fat storage in Drosophila. Transgenic modulation of Gαq, Gγ1 and Plc21C affected the iCa2＋ of fat body cells and the expression profile of the lipid metabolism effector genes midway and brummer, which results in severely obese or lean flies. Moreover, functional impairment of Gαq, Gγ1 and Plc21C antagonised Akh-induced fat depletion. This study characterizes Gαq, Gγ1 and Plc21C as anti-obesity genes and supports the model that Akh employs the Gαq/Gγ1/Plc21C module of iCa2＋ control to regulate lipid mobilization in adult Drosophila.     

Direct interactions with G α i and G βγ mediate nongenomic signaling by estrogen receptor α

Estrogen induces G protein-dependent nongenomic signaling in a variety of cell types via the activation of a plasma membrane-associated subpopulation of estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha). Using pull-down experiments with purified recombinant proteins, we now demonstrate that ER alpha binds directly to G alpha i and G betagamma. Mutagenesis and the addition of blocking peptide reveals that this occurs via amino acids 251-260 and 271-595 of ER alpha, respectively. Studies of ER alpha complexed with heterotrimeric G proteins further show that estradiol causes the release of both G alpha i and G betagamma without stimulating GTP binding to G alpha i. Moreover, in COS-7 cells, the disruption of ER alpha-G alpha i interaction by deletion mutagenesis of ER alpha or expression of blocking peptide, as well as G betagamma sequestration with beta-adrenergic receptor kinase C terminus, prevents nongenomic responses to estradiol including src and erk activation. In endothelial cells, the disruption of ER alpha-G alpha i interaction prevents estradiol-induced nitric oxide synthase activation and the resulting attenuation of monocyte adhesion that contributes to estrogen-related cardiovascular protection. Thus, through direct interactions, ER alpha mediates a novel mechanism of G protein activation that provides greater diversity of function of both the steroid hormone receptor and G proteins.