A sedimentation study of the interaction of superhelical SV40 DNA with H1 histone.

By moving boundary sedimentation it is shown that the interaction of H1 histone with superhelical circular SV40 DNA results in the formation of giant heterogeneous aggregates. The size of these aggregates grows with increasing H1 concentration. s20,w values of some 10 000 S were measured. As compared with open relaxed circular DNA a preferential interaction of superhelical DNA with H1 histone is observed, irrespective of the sign of the superhelical turns which was reversed by the addition to DNA of ethidium bromide. The addition to the H1 complexed aggregates of ethidium bromide effects a progressive breakdown of the aggregates. Furthermore, the superhelicity of DNA is not changed by the addition of small amounts of H1 histone.     

Cooperative interaction of histone H1 with DNA.

The cooperative binding of histone H1 with DNA was studied using a fluorescently labelled histone H1. The titration data were analysed in terms of the large ligand model. The stoichiometric number, n = 65 +/- 10 bases/H1, was independent of NaCl concentration (0.02 - 0.35 M). The nucleation and the cooperative binding constants, K' and K, and the cooperativity parameter q were sensitive to salt concentration; K = 3.6 +/- 0.8 X 10(7) M-1 and q = 1.1 +/- 0.4 X 10(3) at 0.2 M NaCl. The dependence of K' on NaCl concentration revealed that 6 Na+ ions were released from DNA upon complex formation. An extrapolation of K' to 1M NaCl yielded a small value, K' = 5 +/- 2 M-1. Thus the binding of H1 is essentially electrostatic, being compatible with its independence of temperature. A calculation of K' based on the counterion release reproduced the salt concentration dependence of K'. Therefore, the binding of H1 is of an electrostatic territorial type. Thus, H1 may move along the DNA chain to a certain extent, when both salt concentration and the degree of saturation are sufficiently low. The condition is so restricted that the sliding would not play an important role in vivo. It was concluded from the DNA concentration independent binding isotherm that H1 can cooperatively bind onto a single DNA molecule. A simple power law dependence of the cooperativity parameter q upon NaCl concentration was found; q oc[NaCl]h with h = 0.72, though the physical basis of this dependence remains unknown.     

Linker histone binding to superhelical DNA: Electrophoretic and filter binding studies

It has been known for years that linker histones bind preferentially to supercoiled DNA. This preference has been demonstrated by a number of different techniques including deoxyfibonucleoprotein electrophoresis, sedimentation, and filter binding under non-competitive conditions. In an attempt to further study this issue, we used one- and two-dimensional electrophoretic gels and filter binding under competitive conditions, with all DNA forms of interest being simultaneously present in the incubation mixture. Comparison between results obtained by the two methods showed that whereas the preference for superhelical molecules was clearly seen in the electrophoretic gels, the filter binding assay failed to reveal this preference. These results reveal limitations to the filter binding technique, which must be borne in mind in studies involving superhelical DNA molecules.     

Specific interaction of histone H1 with eukaryotic DNA.

The interaction of calf thymus histone H1 with homologous and heterologous DNA has been studied at different ionic strengths. It has been found that about 0.5 M NaCl histone H1, and its fragments N-H1 (residues 1-72) and C-H1 (residues 73-C terminal), precipitate selectively a small fraction of calf thymus DNA. This selective precipitation is preserved up to very high values (less than 2.0) of the input histone H1/DNA ratio. The percentage of DNA insolubilized by histone H1 under these ionic conditions is dependent upon the molecular weight of the nucleic acid, diminishing from 18% fro a Mw equals 1.0 x 10(7) daltons to 5% for a Mw equals 8.0 x 10(4) daltons. The base composition of the precipitated DNA is similar to that of the bulk DNA. Calf thymus histone H1 also selectively precipitates a fraction of DNA from other eukaryotes (herring, trout), but not from some prokaryotes (E. coli, phage gamma. On the other hand, at 0.5 M NaCl, the whole calf thymus DNA (but not E. coli DNA) presents a limited number of binding sites for histone H1, the saturation ratio histone H1 bound/total DNA being similar to that found in chromatin. A similar behavior is observed from the histone H1 fragments, N-H1 and C-H1, which bind to DNA in complementary saturation ratios. It is suggested that in eukaryotic organisms histone H1 molecules maintain specific interactions with certain DNA sequences. A fraction of such specific complexes could act as nucleation points for the high-order levels of chromatin organization.     

Interaction of histone H1 from sea urchin sperm with superhelical and relaxed DNA

Complexes of histone H1 from sea urchin sperm (H1S) and calf thymus (H1T) with superhelical DNA I and relaxed circular DNA II have been analyzed by analytical sedimentation. Similar to H1T, the highly basic and relatively arginine-rich histone H1S preferentially interacts with DNA I compared to DNA II under competition conditions. However, H1S induces a stronger aggregation of bothforms of DNA than H1T. Below 0.05 M NaCl, the soluble complexes formed by both histones have similar properties, but aggregation proceeds in a different manner: H1S induces a stronger aggregation of DNA II as compared to DNA I, whereas H1T fails to aggregate DNA I.The results are explained on the basis of differences in amino acid sequence and structure of the two histones and related to the special chromatin condensing ability of histone H1S.     

Interaction of histone H1 with superhelical DNA conformational studies and influence of ionic strength

The interaction of histone H1 with superhelical SV40 DNA at low ionic strength (0.02 M NaCl) results in the formation of DNP double-fibers and bundle-and cablelike twisted side-by-side associates of several of these double-fibers. On the basis of simple cylindrical or ellipsoidal models the sedimentation properties of these structures can be calculated in accordance with the experiment allowing a direct assignment of electron microscopical and hydrodynamic results. Sedimentation measurements in dependence on the ionic strength indicate a redistribution of H1 resulting in the formation of associates at 0.04 M NaCl and of aggregates at higher salt concentration. Double-fibers are present up to physiological salt concentrations.     

The interaction of core histones with DNA: equilibrium binding studies.

The binding of core histone proteins to DNA, measured as a function of [NaCl[ is a reversible process. Dissociation and reassociation occurs in two stages. Between 0.7 and 1.2 M NaCl H2a H2b bind non-cooperatively as an equimolar complex with deltaGo = 1.6 Kcals/mole at 4 degree C and 1.0 M NaCl. Between 1.2 and 2.0 M NaCl H3 and H4 bind cooperatively as an equimolar complex with delta Go = 7.4 Kcal/mole at 4 degree C and 1.0 M NaCl. The proper binding of H2a and H2b requires the presence of bound H3 and H4. Nuclease digestion of the H3-H4 DNA produces a tetramer of H3-H4 bound to fragments of DNA 145, 125 and 104 base pairs long. Thus an H3-H4 tetramer can protect fragments of DNA as long as those found in complete core particles and must therefore span the nucleosome core particle.     

The interaction of DNA with sperm-specific histones of the H1 family

We have studied the interactions of DNA with sperm-specific histones of the H1 family of sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius, sea starfish Aphelasterias japonica and bivalve mollusk Chlamis islandicus using circular dichroism and DNA melting analysis. It was shown that echinoderm's sperm H1 protein has additional alpha-helical domains in its C-terminus and it demonstrates stronger DNA compaction. The differential melting curves of DNA-protein complexes have two peaks. The low temperature peak characterized the melting temperature of free DNA within the complex. The higher temperature peak characterizes the melting temperature of DNA bond to protein. DNA is found to be in the most stable state in the complexes with mollusk sperm H1 protein.     

Interaction of histone H1 with superhelical DNA. Sedimentation and electron microscopical studies at low salt concentration

Complexes of histones H1 with superhelical SV40 DNA obtained by direct mixing were studied in 0.1 SSC buffer corresponding to 0.02 M Na+. Depending on the molar input ratio H1/DNA three classes of sedimenting species were observed: (1) a component sedimenting similar to superhelical DNA with a sedimentation coefficient s2o,w of 25 S observable up to 335 Mol H1/Mol DNA (w/w = 2); (2) a component with s2o,w = 120 S appearing at 135 Mol H1/Mol DNA and (3) growing amounts of heterogeneous aggregates greater than 1000 S. Electron micrographs revealed the 25 S component to consist of double-fibers formed from one DNA molecule and the 120 S component to consist of bundles of several such double-fibers. The aggregates represent cable-like structures. The addition of ethidium bromide to 25 S complexes induces the formation of bundles, if H1 is present in a quantity which alone is not sufficient to bring about this effect. This result indicates that ethidium bromide effects a redistribution of H1 molecules and that H1 is responsible for the bundle formation.     

Cooperative binding of the globular domains of histones H1 and H5 to DNA.

In view of the likely role of H1-H1 interactions in the stabilization of chromatin higher order structure, we have asked whether interactions can occur between the globular domains of the histone molecules. We have studied the properties of the isolated globular domains of H1 and the variant H5 (GH1 and GH5) and we have shown (by sedimentation analysis, electron microscopy, chemical cross-linking and nucleoprotein gel electrophoresis) that although GH1 shows no, and GH5 little if any, tendency to self-associate in dilute solution, they bind highly cooperatively to DNA. The resulting complexes appear to contain essentially continuous arrays of globular domains bridging 'tramlines' of DNA, similar to those formed with intact H1, presumably reflecting the ability of the globular domain to bind more than one DNA segment, as it is likely to do in the nucleosome. Additional (thicker) complexes are also formed with GH5, probably resulting from association of the primary complexes, possibly with binding of additional GH5. The highly cooperative nature of the binding, in close apposition, of GH1 and GH5 to DNA is fully compatible with the involvement of interactions between the globular domains of H1 and its variants in chromatin folding.     

Differences among subfractions of H1 histone in retention of linear and superhelical DNA on filters

Four kinds of rabbit thymus H1 histone differ among themselves in their ability to retain DNA on nitrocellulose filters. This is true for linear, or superhelical DNA, but the order of effectiveness of the different H1 histones depends on the physical conformation of the DNA. For linear DNA the binding efficiencies of the H1 histones are: RTL2 = RTL3 greater than RTL4 greater than RTL1. This order of effectiveness parallels the effectiveness of the H1 histones previously found for the condensation of linear DNA as observed by circular dichroism and viscosity. The binding efficiencies of the various histones toward superhelical DNA were: RTL4 greater than RTL3 greater than RTL1 greater than RTL2. The variation in amino acid sequence between different rabbit thymus H1 histones might thus introduce structural variations in nucleohistone fibers and perhaps in chromatin.     

Salt-dependent co-operative interaction of histone H1 with linear DNA

The nature of the complexes formed between histone H1 and linear double-stranded DNA is dependent on ionic strength and on the H1 : DNA ratio. At an input ratio of less than about 60% (w/w) H1 : DNA, there is a sharp transition from non-co-operative to co-operative binding at a critical salt concentration that depends on the DNA size and is in the range 20 to 50 mM-NaCl. Above this critical ionic strength the H1 binds to only some of the DNA molecules leaving the rest free, as shown by sedimentation analysis. The ionic strength range over which this change in behaviour occurs is also that over which chromatin folding is induced. Above the salt concentration required for co-operative binding of H1 to DNA, but not below it, H1 molecules are in close proximity as shown by the formation of H1 polymers upon chemical cross-linking. The change in binding mode is not driven by the folding of the globular domain of H1, since this is already folded at low salt in the presence of DNA, as indicated by its resistance to tryptic digestion. The H1-DNA complexes at low salt, where H1 is bound distributively to all DNA molecules, contain thickened regions about 6 nm across interspersed with free DNA, as shown by electron microscopy. The complexes formed at higher salt through co-operative interactions are rods of relatively uniform width (11 to 15 nm) whose length is about 1.6 times shorter than that of the input DNA, or are circular if the DNA is long enough. They contain approximately 70% (w/w) H1 : DNA and several DNA molecules. These thick complexes can also be formed at low salt (15 mM-NaCl) when the H1 : DNA input ratio is sufficiently high (approximately 70%).     

The interaction of histone H3 with histone H4 and with other histones studied by 19F nuclear magnetic resonance.

The behaviour, upon variations in ionic strength, pH and temperature of 19F nuclear nuclear magnetic resonance signals of the trifluoroacetonylated derivative of histone H3 is compared with those of the H3-H4 complex and of the Hv fraction (an equimolar mixture of H2A, H2B, H3 and h4). The line width of the 19F-labelled histone H3 signals increases with ionic strength or pH, an effect consistent with aggregation of the protein. In the case of H3-H4 complex or Hv the line width decreases at intermediate ionic strengths (0.1-0.25 M NaCl). This effect is interpreted as the consequence of the formation of a well defined structure with ionic strength. At high salt concentrations the line width increases as a consequence of the final rigid quaternary structure or of the formation of higher aggregates.     

Chemical cross-linking of H1 histone to the nucleosomal histones.

When whole steer kidney nuclei were treated with dimethyl-3,3'-dithiobisproprionimidate, N,N'-bis(2-carboxyimidomethyl) tartaramide dimethyl ester, or 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide under approximately physiological ionic conditions, H1 histone was cross-linked to each of the four histones in the nucleosome core. The carbodiimide reagent, which introduces no atoms between the amino acid side chains being joined, seemed to give the same result as did the longer di-imidate cross-linking reagents. When conditions were optimized for the production of of H1-containing dimers, the total yield of H1-core histone heterodimers was nearly equal to the yield of H1 homodimers. Naturally occurring H1 dimers and cross-linked heterodimers of high mobility group proteins 14 and 17 with H1 and core histones were also observed.     

Distinct regions of the chicken p46 polypeptide are required for its in vitro interaction with histones H2B and H4 and histone acetyltransferase-1

We cloned cDNA encoding the chicken p46 polypeptide, chp46, homologous to the p48 subunit of chicken chromatin assembly factor-1, chCAF-1p48. It comprises 424 amino acids including a putative initiation Met, is a member of the WD protein family, with seven WD repeat motifs, and exhibits 90.3% identity to chCAF-1p48 and 94.3% identity to the human and mouse p46 polypeptides (hup46 and mop46). The in vitro immunoprecipitation experiment established that chp46 interacts with histones H2B and H4 and chicken histone acetyltransferase-1, chHAT-1, whereas hup46 interacts with histones H2A and H4 and chHAT-1 and chCAF-1p48 with histone H4 and chHAT-1. The in vitro immunoprecipitation experiment, involving truncated mutants of chp46, revealed not only that two regions comprising amino acids 33-179 and 375-404 are necessary for its binding to H2B, but also that two regions comprising amino acids 1-32 and 405-424 are necessary for its binding to H4. Furthermore, the GST pulldown affinity assay, involving truncated mutants of chp46, revealed that a region comprising amino acids 359-404 (in fact, 375-404) binds to chHAT-1 in vitro. Taken together, these results indicate not only that chp46 should participate differentially in a number of DNA-utilizing processes through interactions of its distinct regions with chHAT-1 and histones H2B and H4, but also that the proper propeller structure of chp46 is not necessary for its interaction with chHAT-1.     

Cooperative interaction of the C-terminal domain of histone H1 with DNA

We have studied the interaction of the isolated C-terminal domain of histone H1 with linear DNA using precipitation curves and electron microscopy. The C-terminal domain shows a salt-dependent transition towards cooperative binding, which reaches completion at 60 mM NaCl. At this salt concentration, the C-terminal domain binds to some of the DNA molecules, leaving the rest free. A binding site of 22 base-pairs can be calculated from the stoichiometry of the precipitated fractions. The C-terminal domain condenses the DNA in toroidal particles. The average inner radius of the particles is of the order of 195 A. Consideration of the value of the inner radius of the toroids in the light of counterion condensation theory suggests that in these complexes the isolated C-terminal domain is capable of nearly full electrostatic neutralization of the DNA phosphate charge.