Molecular basis for Rac1 recognition by guanine nucleotide exchange factors.

Rho GTPases are activated by a family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) known as Dbl family proteins. The structural basis for how GEFs recognize and activate Rho GTPases is presently ill defined. Here, we utilized the crystal structure of the DH/PH domains of the Rac-specific GEF Tiam1 in complex with Rac1 to determine the structural elements of Rac1 that regulate the specificity of this interaction. We show that residues in the Rac1 beta2-beta3 region are critical for Tiam1 recognition. Additionally, we determined that a single Rac1-to-Cdc42 mutation (W56F) was sufficient to abolish Rac1 sensitivity to Tiam1 and allow recognition by the Cdc42-specific DH/PH domains of Intersectin while not impairing Rac1 downstream activities. Our findings identified unique GEF specificity determinants in Rac1 and provide important insights into the mechanism of DH/PH selection of GTPase targets.     

Structure of Arf6-GDP suggests a basis for guanine nucleotide exchange factors specificity

Arf6 is an isoform of Arf that localizes at the periphery of the cell where it has an essential role in endocytotic pathways. Its function does not overlap with that of Arf1, although the two proteins share approximately 70% sequence identity and they have switch regions, whose conformation depends on the nature of the guanine nucleotide, with almost identical sequences. The crystal structure of Arf6-GDP at 2.3 A shows that it has a conformation similar to that of Arf1-GDP, which cannot bind membranes with high affinity. Significantly, the switch regions of Arf6 deviate by 2-5 A from those of Arf1. These differences are a consequence of the shorter N-terminal linker of Arf6 and of discrete sequence changes between Arf6 and Arf1. Mutational analysis shows that one of the positions which differs between Arf1 and Arf6 affects the configuration of the nucleotide binding site and thus the nucleotide binding properties of the Arf variant. Altogether, our results provide a structural basis for understanding how Arf1 and Arf6 can be distinguished by their guanine nucleotide exchange factors and suggest a model for the nucleotide/membrane cycle of Arf6.     

Structural insights into the small GTPase specificity of the DOCK guanine nucleotide exchange factors

The dedicator of cytokinesis (DOCK) family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) regulates cytoskeletal dynamics by activating the GTPases Rac and/or Cdc42. Eleven human DOCK proteins play various important roles in developmental processes and the immune system. Of these, DOCK1–5 proteins bind to engulfment and cell motility (ELMO) proteins to perform their physiological functions. Recent structural studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of the complex and diverse mechanisms of DOCK GEF activity and GTPase recognition and its regulation by ELMO. This review is focused on gaining structural insights into the substrate specificity of the DOCK GEFs, and discuss how Rac and Cdc42 are specifically recognized by the catalytic DHR-2 and surrounding domains of DOCK or binding partners.     

Structural basis of guanine nucleotide exchange mediated by the T-cell essential Vav1

The guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Vav1 plays an important role in T-cell activation and tumorigenesis. In the GEF superfamily, Vav1 has the ability to interact with multiple families of Rho GTPases. The structure of the Vav1 DH-PH-CRD/Rac1 complex to 2.6 Å resolution reveals a unique intramolecular network of contacts between the Vav1 cysteine-rich domain (CRD) and the C-terminal helix of the Vav1 Dbl homology (DH) domain. These unique interactions stabilize the Vav1 DH domain for its intimate association with the Switch II region of Rac1 that is critical for the displacement of the guanine nucleotide. Small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) studies support this domain arrangement for the complex in solution. Further, mutational analyses confirms that the atypical CRD is critical for maintaining both optimal guanine nucleotide exchange activity and broader specificity of Vav family GEFs. Taken together, the data outline the detailed nature of Vav1's ability to contact a range of Rho GTPases using a novel protein-protein interaction network.     

The RasGrf family of mammalian guanine nucleotide exchange factors

RasGrf1 and RasGrf2 are highly homologous mammalian guanine nucleotide exchange factors which are able to activate specific Ras or Rho GTPases. The RasGrf genes are preferentially expressed in the central nervous system, although specific expression of either locus may also occur elsewhere. RasGrf1 is a paternally-expressed, imprinted gene that is expressed only after birth. In contrast, RasGrf2 is not imprinted and shows a wider expression pattern. A variety of isoforms for both genes are also detectable in different cellular contexts. The RasGrf proteins exhibit modular structures composed by multiple domains including CDC25H and DHPH motifs responsible for promoting GDP/GTP exchange, respectively, on Ras or Rho GTPase targets. The various domains are essential to define their intrinsic exchanger activity and to modulate the specificity of their functional activity so as to connect different upstream signals to various downstream targets and cellular responses. Despite their homology, RasGrf1 and RasGrf2 display differing target specificities and non overlapping functional roles in a variety of signaling contexts related to cell growth and differentiation as well as neuronal excitability and response or synaptic plasticity. Whereas both RasGrfs are activatable by glutamate receptors, G-protein-coupled receptors or changes in intracellular calcium concentration, only RasGrf1 is reported to be activated by LPA, cAMP, or agonist-activated Trk and cannabinoid receptors. Analysis of various knockout mice strains has uncovered a specific functional contribution of RasGrf1 in processes of memory and learning, photoreception, control of post-natal growth and body size and pancreatic β-cell function and glucose homeostasis. For RasGrf2, specific roles in lymphocyte proliferation, T-cell signaling responses and lymphomagenesis have been described.     

Discriminatory residues in Ras and Rap for guanine nucleotide exchange factor recognition

The inability of the S17N mutant of Rap1A to sequester the catalytic domain of the Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor C3G (van den Berghe, N., Cool, R. H., Horn, G., and Wittinghofer, A. (1997) Oncogene 15, 845-850) prompted us to study possible fundamental differences in the way Rap1 interacts with C3G compared with the interaction of Ras with the catalytic domain of the mouse Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor Cdc25(Mm). A variety of mutants in both Ras and Rap1A were designed, and both the C3G and Cdc25(Mm) catalyzed release of guanine nucleotide from these mutants was studied. In addition, we could identify regions in Rap2A that are responsible for the lack of recognition by C3G and induce high C3G activity by replacement of these residues with the corresponding Rap1A residues. The different Ras and Rap mutants showed that many residues were equally important for both C3G and Cdc25(Mm), suggesting that they interact similarly with their substrates. However, several residues were also identified to be important for the exchange reaction with only C3G (Leu70) or only Cdc25(Mm) (Gln61 and Tyr40). These results are discussed in the light of the structure of the Ras-Sos complex and suggest that some important differences in the interaction of Rap1 with C3G and Ras with Cdc25(Mm) indeed exist and that marker residues have been identified for the different structural requirements.     

Characterization of the interactions between the small GTPase RhoA and its guanine nucleotide exchange factors

A novel spectrophotometric method to study the kinetics of the guanine nucleotide exchange factors-catalyzed reactions is presented. The method incorporates two coupling enzyme systems: (a). GTPase-activating protein which stimulates the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis reaction of small GTPases and (b). purine nucleotide phosphorylase and its chromophoric substrate, 7-methyl-6-thioguanosine, for quantitation of the resultant inorganic phosphate. The continuous coupled enzyme system was used for characterization of the interactions between the small GTPase RhoA and its guanine nucleotide exchange factors, Lbc and Dbl. Kinetic parameters obtained here show that there is no significant difference in kinetic mechanism of these GEFs in interaction with RhoA. The Michaelis-Menten constants were determined to be around 1micro M, and the rate constants k(cat) were around 0.1s(-1).     

Proteomic analysis of Rac1 signaling regulation by guanine nucleotide exchange factors

The small GTPase Rac1 is implicated in various cellular processes that are essential for normal cell function. Deregulation of Rac1 signaling has also been linked to a number of diseases, including cancer. The diversity of Rac1 functioning in cells is mainly attributed to its ability to bind to a multitude of downstream effectors following activation by Guanine nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs). Despite the identification of a large number of Rac1 binding partners, factors influencing downstream specificity are poorly defined, thus hindering the detailed understanding of both Rac1's normal and pathological functions. In a recent study, we demonstrated a role for 2 Rac-specific GEFs, Tiam1 and P-Rex1, in mediating Rac1 anti- versus pro-migratory effects, respectively. Importantly, via conducting a quantitative proteomic screen, we identified distinct changes in the Rac1 interactome following activation by either GEF, indicating that these opposing effects are mediated through GEF modulation of the Rac1 interactome. Here, we present the full list of identified Rac1 interactors together with functional annotation of the differentially regulated Rac1 binding partners. In light of this data, we also provide additional insights into known and novel signaling cascades that might account for the GEF-mediated Rac1-driven cellular effects.     

Specific recognition of Rac2 and Cdc42 by DOCK2 and DOCK9 guanine nucleotide exchange factors

Recognition of cognate Rho GTPases by guanine-nucleotide exchange factors (GEF) is fundamental to Rho GTPase signaling specificity. Two main GEF families use either the Dbl homology (DH) or the DOCK homology region 2 (DHR-2) catalytic domain. How DHR-2-containing GEFs distinguish between the GTPases Rac and Cdc42 is not known. To determine how these GEFs specifically recognize the two Rho GTPases, we studied the amino acid sequences in Rac2 and Cdc42 that are crucial for activation by DOCK2, a Rac-specific GEF, and DOCK9, a distantly related Cdc42-specific GEF. Two elements in the N-terminal regions of Rac2 and Cdc42 were found to be essential for specific interactions with DOCK2 and DOCK9. One element consists of divergent amino acid residues in the switch 1 regions of the GTPases. Significantly, these residues were also found to be important for GTPase recognition by Rac-specific DOCK180, DOCK3, and DOCK4 GEFs. These findings were unexpected because the same residues were shown previously to interact with GTPase effectors rather than GEFs. The other element comprises divergent residues in the beta3 strand that are known to mediate specific recognition by DH domain containing GEFs. Remarkably, Rac2-to-Cdc42 substitutions of four of these residues were sufficient for Rac2 to be specifically activated by DOCK9. Thus, DOCK2 and DOCK9 specifically recognize Rac2 and Cdc42 through their switch 1 as well as beta2-beta3 regions and the mode of recognition via switch 1 appears to be conserved among diverse Rac-specific DHR-2 GEFs.     

Molecular basis for the substrate specificity of plant guanine nucleotide exchange factors for ROP

Plant G proteins of the ROP/RAC family regulate cellular processes including cytoskeletal rearrangement in polar growth. Activation of the ROP molecular switch is triggered by guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Plant-specific RopGEFs are exclusively active on ROPs despite their high homology to animal Rho proteins. Based on a sequence comparison of ROPs vs. animal Rho proteins together with structural data on distinct ROPs, we identified unique substrate determinants of RopGEF specificity by mutational analysis: asparagine 68 next to switch II, arginine 76 of a putative phosphorylation motif and the Rho insert are essential for substrate recognition by RopGEFs. These data also provide first evidence for a function of the Rho insert in interactions with GEFs.     

Chlamydial entry involves TARP binding of guanine nucleotide exchange factors

Chlamydia trachomatis attachment to cells induces the secretion of the elementary body-associated protein TARP (Translocated Actin Recruiting Protein). TARP crosses the plasma membrane where it is immediately phosphorylated at tyrosine residues by unknown host kinases. The Rac GTPase is also activated, resulting in WAVE2 and Arp2/3-dependent recruitment of actin to the sites of chlamydia attachment. We show that TARP participates directly in chlamydial invasion activating the Rac-dependent signaling cascade to recruit actin. TARP functions by binding two distinct Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), Sos1 and Vav2, in a phosphotyrosine-dependent manner. The tyrosine phosphorylation profile of the sequence YEPISTENIYESI within TARP, as well as the transient activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K), appears to determine which GEF is utilized to activate Rac. The first and second tyrosine residues, when phosphorylated, are utilized by the Sos1/Abi1/Eps8 and Vav2, respectively, with the latter requiring the lipid phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate. Depletion of these critical signaling molecules by siRNA resulted in inhibition of chlamydial invasion to varying degrees, owing to a possible functional redundancy of the two pathways. Collectively, these data implicate TARP in signaling to the actin cytoskeleton remodeling machinery, demonstrating a mechanism by which C.trachomatis invades non-phagocytic cells.     

Activation of H-Ras in the endoplasmic reticulum by the RasGRF family guanine nucleotide exchange factors

Recent findings indicate that in addition to its location in the peripheral plasma membrane, H-Ras is found in endomembranes like the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi complex. In these locations H-Ras is functional and can efficiently engage downstream effectors, but little is known about how its activation is regulated in these environments. Here we show that the RasGRF family exchange factors, both endogenous and ectopically expressed, are present in the endoplasmic reticulum but not in the Golgi complex. With the aid of H-Ras constructs specifically tethered to the plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi complex, we demonstrate that RasGRF1 and RasGRF2 can activate plasma membrane and reticular, but not Golgi-associated, H-Ras. We also show that RasGRF DH domain is required for the activation of H-Ras in the endoplasmic reticulum but not in the plasma membrane. Furthermore, we demonstrate that RasGRF mediation favors the activation of reticular H-Ras by lysophosphatidic acid treatment whereas plasma membrane H-Ras is made more responsive to stimulation by ionomycin. Overall, our results provide the initial insights into the regulation of H-Ras activation in the endoplasmic reticulum.     

Identification of residues of the H-ras protein critical for functional interaction with guanine nucleotide exchange factors.

Ras proteins are activated in vivo by guanine nucleotide exchange factors encoded by genes homologous to the CDC25 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have taken a combined genetic and biochemical approach to probe the sites on Ras proteins important for interaction with such exchange factors and to further probe the mechanism of CDC25-catalyzed GDP-GTP exchange. Random mutagenesis coupled with genetic selection in S. cerevisiae was used to generate second-site mutations within human H-ras-ala15 which could suppress the ability of the Ala-15 substitution to block CDC25 function. We transferred these second-site suppressor mutations to normal H-ras and oncogenic H-rasVal-12 to test whether they induced a general loss of function or whether they selectively affected CDC25 interaction. Four highly selective mutations were discovered, and they affected the surface-located amino acid residues 62, 63, 67, and 69. Two lines of evidence suggested that these residues may be involved in binding to CDC25: (i) using the yeast two-hybrid system, we demonstrated that these mutants cannot bind CDC25 under conditions where the wild-type H-Ras protein can; (ii) we demonstrated that the binding to H-Ras of monoclonal antibody Y13-259, whose epitope has been mapped to residues 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, and 73, is blocked by the mouse sos1 and yeast CDC25 gene products. We also present evidence that the mechanism by which CDC25 catalyzes exchange is more involved than simply catalyzing the release of bound nucleotide and passively allowing nucleotides to rebind. Most critically, a complex of Ras and CDC25 protein, unlike free Fas protein, possesses significantly greater affinity for GTP than for GDP. Furthermore, the Ras CDC25 complex is more readily dissociated into free subunits by GTP than it is by GDP. Both of these results suggest a function for CDC25 in promoting the selective exchange of GTP for GDP.     

Structural basis for guanine nucleotide exchange on Ran by the regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1)

RCC1 (regulator of chromosome condensation), a beta propeller chromatin-bound protein, is the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for the nuclear GTP binding protein Ran. We report here the 1.8 A crystal structure of a Ran*RCC1 complex in the absence of nucleotide, an intermediate in the multistep GEF reaction. In contrast to previous structures, the phosphate binding region of the nucleotide binding site is perturbed only marginally, possibly due to the presence of a polyvalent anion in the P loop. Biochemical experiments show that a sulfate ion stabilizes the Ran*RCC1 complex and inhibits dissociation by guanine nucleotides. Based on the available structural and biochemical evidence, we present a unified scenario for the GEF mechanism where interaction of the P loop lysine with an acidic residue is a crucial element for the overall reaction.     

Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S disrupts Ras-mediated signal transduction by inhibiting guanine nucleotide exchange factor-catalyzed nucleotide exchange.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S double ADP-ribosylates Ras at Arg(41) and Arg(128). Since Arg(41) is adjacent to the switch 1 region of Ras, ADP-ribosylation could interfere with Ras-mediated signal transduction via several mechanisms, including interaction with Raf, or guanine nucleotide exchange factor-stimulated or intrinsic nucleotide exchange. Initial experiments showed that ADP-ribosylated Ras (ADP-r-Ras) and unmodified Ras (Ras) interacted with Raf with equal efficiencies, indicating that ADP-ribosylation did not interfere with Ras-Raf interactions. While ADP-r-Ras and Ras possessed equivalent intrinsic nucleotide exchange rates, guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25) stimulated the nucleotide exchange of ADP-r-Ras at a 3-fold slower rate than Ras. ADP-r-Ras did not affect the nucleotide exchange of Ras, indicating that the ADP-ribosylation of Ras was not a dominant negative phenotype. Ras-R41K and ADP-r-Ras R41K possessed similar exchange rates as Ras, indicating that ADP-ribosylation at Arg(128) did not inhibit Cdc25-stimulated nucleotide exchange. Consistent with the slower nucleotide exchange rate of ADP-r-Ras as compared with Ras, ADP-r-Ras bound its guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25) less efficiently than Ras in direct binding experiments. Together, these data indicate that ADP-ribosylation of Ras at Arg(41) disrupts Ras-Cdc25 interactions, which inhibits the rate-limiting step in Ras signal transduction, the activation of Ras by its guanine nucleotide exchange factor.     

Identification and characterization of a new family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the ras-related GTPase Ral

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) are responsible for coupling cell surface receptors to Ras protein activation. Here we describe the characterization of a novel family of differentially expressed GEFs, identified by database sequence homology searching. These molecules share the core catalytic domain of other Ras family GEFs but lack the catalytic non-conserved (conserved non-catalytic/Ras exchange motif/structurally conserved region 0) domain that is believed to contribute to Sos1 integrity. In vitro binding and in vivo nucleotide exchange assays indicate that these GEFs specifically catalyze the GTP loading of the Ral GTPase when overexpressed in 293T cells. A central proline-rich motif associated with the Src homology (SH)2/SH3-containing adapter proteins Grb2 and Nck in vivo, whereas a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain was located at the GEF C terminus. We refer to these GEFs as RalGPS 1A, 1B, and 2 (Ral GEFs with PH domain and SH3 binding motif). The PH domain was required for in vivo GEF activity and could be functionally replaced by the Ki-Ras C terminus, suggesting a role in membrane targeting. In the absence of the PH domain RalGPS 1B cooperated with Grb2 to promote Ral activation, indicating that SH3 domain interaction also contributes to RalGPS regulation. In contrast to the Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator family of Ral GEFs, the RalGPS proteins do not possess a Ras-GTP-binding domain, suggesting that they are activated in a Ras-independent manner.     

Biochemical characterisation of TCTP questions its function as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rheb

Translationally controlled tumour protein (TCTP) is involved in malignant transformation and regulation of apoptosis. It has been postulated to serve as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small G-protein Rheb. Rheb functions in the PI3 kinase/mTOR pathway. The study presented here was initiated to characterise the interaction between TCTP and Rheb biochemically. Since (i) no exchange activity of TCTP towards Rheb could be detected in vitro, (ii) no interaction between TCTP and Rheb could be detected by NMR spectroscopy, and (iii) no effect of TCTP depletion in cells on the direct downstream targets of Rheb could be observed in vivo, this study shows that TCTP is unlikely to be a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rheb.     

Structural basis of the differential binding of the SH3 domains of Grb2 adaptor to the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Sos1

Grb2-Sos1 interaction, mediated by the canonical binding of N-terminal SH3 (nSH3) and C-terminal SH3 (cSH3) domains of Grb2 to a proline-rich sequence in Sos1, provides a key regulatory switch that relays signaling from activated receptor tyrosine kinases to downstream effector molecules such as Ras. Here, using isothermal titration calorimetry in combination with site-directed mutagenesis, we show that the nSH3 domain binds to a Sos1-derived peptide containing the proline-rich consensus motif PPVPPR with an affinity that is nearly threefold greater than that observed for the binding of cSH3 domain. We further demonstrate that such differential binding of nSH3 domain relative to the cSH3 domain is largely due to the requirement of a specific acidic residue in the RT loop of the β-barrel fold to engage in the formation of a salt bridge with the arginine residue in the consensus motif PPVPPR. While this role is fulfilled by an optimally positioned D15 in the nSH3 domain, the chemically distinct and structurally non-equivalent E171 substitutes in the case of the cSH3 domain. Additionally, our data suggest that salt tightly modulates the binding of both SH3 domains to Sos1 in a thermodynamically distinct manner. Our data further reveal that, while binding of both SH3 domains to Sos1 is under enthalpic control, the nSH3 binding suffers from entropic penalty in contrast to entropic gain accompanying the binding of cSH3, implying that the two domains employ differential thermodynamic mechanisms for Sos1 recognition. Our new findings are rationalized in the context of 3D structural models of SH3 domains in complex with the Sos1 peptide. Taken together, our study provides structural basis of the differential binding of SH3 domains of Grb2 to Sos1 and a detailed thermodynamic profile of this key protein-protein interaction pertinent to cellular signaling and cancer.     

Mechanism of the guanine nucleotide exchange reaction of Ras GTPase--evidence for a GTP/GDP displacement model

Ras GTPases function as binary switches in the signaling pathways controlling cell growth and differentiation by cycling between the inactive GDP-bound and the active GTP-bound states. They are activated through interaction with guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that catalyze the exchange of bound GDP with cytosolic GTP. In a conventional scheme, the biochemical roles of GEFs are postulated as stimulating the release of the bound GDP and stabilizing a nucleotide-free transition state of Ras. Herein we have examined in detail the catalyzed GDP/GTP exchange reaction mechanism by a Ras specific GEF, GRF1. In the absence of free nucleotide, GRF1 could not efficiently stimulate GDP dissociation from Ras. The release of the Ras-bound GDP was dependent upon the concentration and the structure of the incoming nucleotide, in particular, the hydrophobicity of the beta and gamma phosphate groups, suggesting that the GTP binding step is a prerequisite for GDP dissociation, is the rate-limiting step in the GEF reaction, or both. Using a pair of fluorescent guanine nucleotides (N-methylanthraniloyl GDP and 2',3'-O-(2,4,6-trinitrocyclohexadienylidene)-GTP) as donor and acceptor probes, we were able to detect fluorescence resonance energy transfer between the incoming GTP and the departing GDP on Ras under controlled kinetic conditions, providing evidence that there may exist a novel intermediate of the GEF-Ras complex that transiently binds to two nucleotides simultaneously. Furthermore, we found that Ras was capable of binding pyrophosphate (PPi) with a dissociation constant of 26 microM and that PPi and GMP, but neither alone, synergistically potentiated the GRF1-stimulated GDP dissociation from Ras. These results strongly support a GEF reaction mechanism by which nucleotide exchange occurs on Ras through a direct GTP/GDP displacement model.     

Identification of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the Rap1 GTPase. Regulation of MR-GEF by M-Ras-GTP interaction

Although the Ras subfamily of GTPases consists of approximately 20 members, only a limited number of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that couple extracellular stimuli to Ras protein activation have been identified. Furthermore, no novel downstream effectors have been identified for the M-Ras/R-Ras3 GTPase. Here we report the identification and characterization of three Ras family GEFs that are most abundantly expressed in brain. Two of these GEFs, MR-GEF (M-Ras-regulated GEF, KIAA0277) and PDZ-GEF (KIAA0313) bound specifically to nucleotide-free Rap1 and Rap1/Rap2, respectively. Both proteins functioned as Rap1 GEFs in vivo. A third GEF, GRP3 (KIAA0846), activated both Ras and Rap1 and shared significant sequence homology with the calcium- and diacylglycerol-activated GEFs, GRP1 and GRP2. Similarly to previously identified Rap GEFs, C3G and Smg GDS, each of the newly identified exchange factors promoted the activation of Elk-1 in the LNCaP prostate tumor cell line where B-Raf can couple Rap1 to the extracellular receptor-activated kinase cascade. MR-GEF and PDZ-GEF both contain a region immediately N-terminal to their catalytic domains that share sequence homology with Ras-associating or RalGDS/AF6 homology (RA) domains. By searching for in vitro interaction with Ras-GTP proteins, PDZ-GEF specifically bound to Rap1A- and Rap2B-GTP, whereas MR-GEF bound to M-Ras-GTP. C-terminally truncated MR-GEF, lacking the GEF catalytic domain, retained its ability to bind M-Ras-GTP, suggesting that the RA domain is important for this interaction. Co-immunoprecipitation studies confirmed the interaction of M-Ras-GTP with MR-GEF in vivo. In addition, a constitutively active M-Ras(71L) mutant inhibited the ability of MR-GEF to promote Rap1A activation in a dose-dependent manner. These data suggest that M-Ras may inhibit Rap1 in order to elicit its biological effects.