Activation of Mrc1, a mediator of the replication checkpoint, by telomere erosion

Background information. In budding yeast, the loss of either telomere sequences (in telomerase‐negative cells) or telomere capping (in mutants of two telomere end‐protection proteins, Cdc13 and Yku) lead, by distinct pathways, to telomeric senescence. After DNA damage, activation of Rad53, which together with Chk1 represents a protein kinase central to all checkpoint pathways, normally requires Rad9, a checkpoint adaptor. Results. We report that in telomerase‐negative (tlc1Δ) cells, activation of Rad53, although diminished, could still take place in the absence of Rad9. In contrast, Rad9 was essential for Rad53 activation in cells that entered senescence in the presence of functional telomerase, namely in senescent cells bearing mutations in telomere end‐protection proteins (cdc13‐1 yku70Δ). In telomerase‐negative cells deleted for RAD9, Mrc1, another checkpoint adaptor previously implicated in the DNA replication checkpoint, mediated Rad53 activation. Rad9 and Rad53, as well as other DNA damage checkpoint proteins (Mec1, Mec3, Chk1 and Dun1), were required for complete DNA‐damage‐induced cell‐cycle arrest after loss of telomerase function. However, unexpectedly, given the formation of an active Rad53–Mrc1 complex in tlc1Δ rad9Δ cells, Mrc1 did not mediate the cell‐cycle arrest elicited by telomerase loss. Finally, we report that Rad9, Mrc1, Dun1 and Chk1 are activated by phosphorylation after telomerase inactivation. Conclusions. These results indicate that loss of telomere capping and loss of telomere sequences, both of which provoke telomeric senescence, are perceived as two distinct types of damages. In contrast with the Rad53–Rad9‐mediated cell‐cycle arrest that functions in a similar way in both types of telomeric senescence, activation of Rad53–Mrc1 might represent a specific response to telomerase inactivation and/or telomere shortening, the functional significance of which has yet to be uncovered.     

The fission yeast MRN complex tethers dysfunctional telomeres for NHEJ repair

Telomeres protect the natural ends of chromosomes from being repaired as deleterious DNA breaks. In fission yeast, absence of Taz1 (homologue of human TRF1 and TRF2) renders telomeres vulnerable to DNA repair. During the G1 phase, when non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) is upregulated, taz1Δ cells undergo telomere fusions with consequent loss of viability. Here, we show that disruption of the fission yeast MRN (Rad23^MRE11‐Rad50‐Nbs1) complex prevents NHEJ at telomeres and, as a result, rescues taz1Δ lethality in G1. Neither Tel1^ATM activation nor 5′‐end resection was required for telomere fusion. Nuclease activity of Rad32^MRE11 was also dispensable for NHEJ. Mutants unable to coordinate metal ions required for nuclease activity were proficient in NHEJ repair. In contrast, Rad32^MRE11 mutations that affect binding and/or positioning of DNA ends leaving the nuclease function largely unaffected also impaired NHEJ at telomeres and restored the viability of taz1Δ in G1. Consistently, MRN structural integrity but not nuclease function is also required for NHEJ of independent DNA ends in a novel split‐molecule plasmid assay. Thus, MRN acts to tether unlinked DNA ends, allowing for efficient NHEJ.     

DDK phosphorylates checkpoint clamp component Rad9 and promotes its release from damaged chromatin

When inappropriate DNA structures arise, they are sensed by DNA structure-dependent checkpoint pathways and subsequently repaired. Recruitment of checkpoint proteins to such structures precedes recruitment of proteins involved in DNA metabolism. Thus, checkpoints can regulate DNA metabolism. We show that fission yeast Rad9, a 9-1-1 heterotrimeric checkpoint-clamp component, is phosphorylated by Hsk1(Cdc7), the Schizosaccharomyces pombe?Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) homolog, in response to replication-induced DNA damage. Phosphorylation of Rad9 disrupts its interaction with replication protein A (RPA) and is dependent on 9-1-1 chromatin loading, the Rad9-associated protein Rad4/Cut5(TopBP1), and prior phosphorylation by Rad3(ATR). rad9 mutants defective in DDK phosphorylation show wild-type checkpoint responses but abnormal DNA repair protein foci and decreased viability after replication stress. We propose that Rad9 phosphorylation by DDK releases Rad9 from DNA damage sites to facilitate DNA repair.     

Roles of the checkpoint sensor clamp Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 (911)-complex and the clamp loaders Rad17-RFC and Ctf18-RFC in Schizosaccharomyces pombe telomere maintenance

While telomeres must provide mechanisms to prevent DNA repair and DNA damage checkpoint factors from fusing chromosome ends and causing permanent cell cycle arrest, these factors associate with functional telomeres and play critical roles in the maintenance of telomeres. Previous studies have established that Tel1 (ATM) and Rad3 (ATR) kinases play redundant but essential roles for telomere maintenance in fission yeast. In addition, the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 (911) and Rad17-RFC complexes work downstream of Rad3 (ATR) in fission yeast telomere maintenance. Here, we investigated how 911, Rad17-RFC and another RFC-like complex Ctf18-RFC contribute to telomere maintenance in fission yeast cells lacking Tel1 and carrying a novel hypomorphic allele of rad3 (DBD-rad3), generated by the fusion between the DNA binding domain (DBD) of the fission yeast telomere capping protein Pot1 and Rad3. Our investigations have uncovered a surprising redundancy for Rad9 and Hus1 in allowing Rad1 to contribute to telomere maintenance in DBD-rad3 tel1 cells. In addition, we found that Rad17-RFC and Ctf18-RFC carry out redundant telomere maintenance functions in DBD-rad3 tel1 cells. Since checkpoint sensor proteins are highly conserved, genetic redundancies uncovered here may be relevant to telomere maintenance and detection of DNA damage in other eukaryotes.     

Initiation of DNA damage responses through XPG‐related nucleases

Lesion‐specific enzymes repair different forms of DNA damage, yet all lesions elicit the same checkpoint response. The common intermediate required to mount a checkpoint response is thought to be single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA), coated by replication protein A (RPA) and containing a primer‐template junction. To identify factors important for initiating the checkpoint response, we screened for genes that, when overexpressed, could amplify a checkpoint signal to a weak allele of chk1 in fission yeast. We identified Ast1, a novel member of the XPG‐related family of endo/exonucleases. Ast1 promotes checkpoint activation caused by the absence of the other XPG‐related nucleases, Exo1 and Rad2, the homologue of Fen1. Each nuclease is recruited to DSBs, and promotes the formation of ssDNA for checkpoint activation and recombinational repair. For Rad2 and Exo1, this is independent of their S‐phase role in Okazaki fragment processing. This XPG‐related pathway is distinct from MRN‐dependent responses, and each enzyme is critical for damage resistance in MRN mutants. Thus, multiple nucleases collaborate to initiate DNA damage responses, highlighting the importance of these responses to cellular fitness.     

Inviability of a DNA2 deletion mutant is due to the DNA damage checkpoint

Dna2 is a dual polarity exo/endonuclease, and 5' to 3' DNA helicase involved in Okazaki Fragment Processing (OFP) and Double-Strand Break (DSB) Repair. In yeast, DNA2 is an essential gene, as expected for a DNA replication protein. Suppression of the lethality of dna2Δ mutants has been found to occur by two mechanisms: overexpression of RAD27^scFEN1, encoding a 5' to 3' exo/endo nuclease that processes Okazaki fragments (OFs) for ligation, or deletion of PIF1, a 5' to 3' helicase involved in mitochondrial recombination, telomerase inhibition and OFP. Mapping of a novel, spontaneously arising suppressor of dna2Δ now reveals that mutation of rad9 and double mutation of rad9 mrc1 can also suppress the lethality of dna2Δ mutants. Interaction of dna2Δ and DNA damage checkpoint mutations provides insight as to why dna2Δ is lethal but rad27Δ is not, even though evidence shows that Rad27^ScFEN1 processes most of the Okazaki fragments, while Dna2 processes only a subset.     

Hsk1 kinase and Cdc45 regulate replication stress-induced checkpoint responses in fission yeast

In fission yeast, replication fork arrest activates the replication checkpoint effector kinase Cds1^Chk2/Rad53 through the Rad3^ATR/Mec1-Mrc1^Claspin pathway. Hsk1, the Cdc7 homolog of fission yeast required for efficient initiation of DNA replication, is also required for Cds1 activation. Hsk1 kinase activity is required for induction and maintenance of Mrc1 hyperphosphorylation, which is induced by replication fork block and mediated by Rad3. Rad3 kinase activity does not change in an hsk1 temperature-sensitive mutant, and Hsk1 kinase activity is not affected by rad3 mutation. Hsk1 kinase vigorously phosphorylates Mrc1 in vitro, predominantly at non-SQ/TQ sites, but this phosphorylation does not seem to affect the Rad3 action on Mrc1. Interestingly, the replication stress-induced activation of Cds1 and hyperphosphorylation of Mrc1 is almost completely abrogated in an initiation-defective mutant of cdc45, but not significantly in an mcm2 or polε mutant. These results suggest that Hsk1-mediated loading of Cdc45 onto replication origins may play important roles in replication stress-induced checkpoint.Key words: Cdc7, Cdc45, checkpoint, DNA replication, Mrc1     

Aph‐1 is required to regulate Presenilin‐mediated γ‐secretase activity and cell survival in Drosophila wing development

Aph‐1 is a multipass transmembrane protein and an essential component of the Presenilin (Psn)‐mediated γ‐secretase complex. During protease assembly, Aph‐1 stabilizes the newly synthesized Psn holoprotein to facilitate generation of the active form of Psn, which is a Psn‐NTF/Psn‐CTF heterodimer produced through a Presenilinase‐initiated endoproteolytic cleavage of the Psn holoprotein. Although it is clear that loss of Aph‐1 activity leads to failure of Psn heterodimer formation, little is understood about whether Aph‐1 plays a role in regulating γ‐secretase activity in addition to assisting Psn maturation. Using various modified Psn forms that do not require endoproteolysis or have a large deletion of the cytosolic loop, we show that in Drosophila Aph‐1 is still required for γ‐secretase activity independent of its role in promoting Psn endoproteolysis. In addition, our results indicate that Aph‐1 is required to promote cell survival in the wing imaginal disc; aph‐1 mutant cells are lost either through cell death or because of a defect in cell proliferation. This function of Aph‐1 is independent of its role in regulating γ‐secretase activity, but possibly involves downregulating the activity of uncleaved Psn holoprotein. genesis 47:169–174, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK is required for DNA damage checkpoint activation

The DNA damage checkpoint controls cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage, and activation of this checkpoint is in turn cell cycle-regulated. Rad9, the ortholog of mammalian 53BP1, is essential for this checkpoint response and is phosphorylated by the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Previous studies suggested that the CDK consensus sites of Rad9 are important for its checkpoint activity. However, the precise CDK sites of Rad9 involved have not been determined. Here we show that CDK consensus sites of Rad9 function in parallel to its BRCT domain toward checkpoint activation, analogous to its fission yeast ortholog Crb2. Unlike Crb2, however, mutation of multiple rather than any individual CDK site of Rad9 is required to completely eliminate its checkpoint activity in vivo. Although Dpb11 interacts with CDK-phosphorylated Rad9, we provide evidence showing that elimination of this interaction does not affect DNA damage checkpoint activation in vivo, suggesting that additional pathway(s) exist. Taken together, these findings suggest that the regulation of Rad9 by CDK and the role of Dpb11 in DNA damage checkpoint activation are more complex than previously suggested. We propose that multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK may provide a more robust system to allow Rad9 to control cell cycle-dependent DNA damage checkpoint activation.     

Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single‐stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends

Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinases are activated by DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs). Mec1/ATR recruitment to DSBs requires the formation of RPA‐coated single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA), which arises from 5′–3′ nucleolytic degradation (resection) of DNA ends. Here, we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 regulates resection of the DSB ends. The lack of Mec1 accelerates resection and reduces the loading to DSBs of the checkpoint protein Rad9, which is known to inhibit ssDNA generation. Extensive resection is instead inhibited by the Mec1‐ad mutant variant that increases the recruitment near the DSB of Rad9, which in turn blocks DSB resection by both Rad53‐dependent and Rad53‐independent mechanisms. The mec1‐ad resection defect leads to prolonged persistence at DSBs of the MRX complex that causes unscheduled Tel1 activation, which in turn impairs checkpoint switch off. Thus, Mec1 regulates the generation of ssDNA at DSBs, and this control is important to coordinate Mec1 and Tel1 signaling activities at these breaks.     

Hsk1 kinase and Cdc45 regulate replication stress-induced checkpoint responses in fission yeast

In fission yeast, replication fork arrest activates the replication checkpoint effector kinase Cds1^Chk2/Rad53 through the Rad3^ATR/Mec1-Mrc1^Claspin pathway. Hsk1, the Cdc7 homologue of fission yeast required for efficient initiation of DNA replication, is also required for Cds1 activation. Hsk1 kinase activity is required for induction and maintenance of Mrc1 hyperphosphorylation, which is induced by replication fork block and mediated by Rad3. Rad3 kinase activity does not change in an hsk1 temperature-sensitive mutant, and Hsk1 kinase activity is not affected by rad3 mutation. Hsk1 kinase vigorously phosphorylates Mrc1 in vitro, predominantly at non-SQ/TQ sites, but this phosphorylation does not seem to affect the Rad3 action on Mrc1. Interestingly, the replication stress-induced activation of Cds1 and hyperphosphorylation of Mrc1 is almost completely abrogated in an initiation-defective mutant of cdc45, but not in an mcm2 or polε mutant. The results suggest that Hsk1-mediated loading of Cdc45 onto replication origins may play important roles in replication stress-induced checkpoint.     

Unloading of homologous recombination factors is required for restoring double‐stranded DNA at damage repair loci

Cells use homology‐dependent DNA repair to mend chromosome breaks and restore broken replication forks, thereby ensuring genome stability and cell survival. DNA break repair via homology‐based mechanisms involves nuclease‐dependent DNA end resection, which generates long tracts of single‐stranded DNA required for checkpoint activation and loading of homologous recombination proteins Rad52/51/55/57. While recruitment of the homologous recombination machinery is well characterized, it is not known how its presence at repair loci is coordinated with downstream re‐synthesis of resected DNA. We show that Rad51 inhibits recruitment of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the platform for assembly of the DNA replication machinery, and that unloading of Rad51 by Srs2 helicase is required for efficient PCNA loading and restoration of resected DNA. As a result, srs2Δ mutants are deficient in DNA repair correlating with extensive DNA processing, but this defect in srs2Δ mutants can be suppressed by inactivation of the resection nuclease Exo1. We propose a model in which during re‐synthesis of resected DNA, the replication machinery must catch up with the preceding processing nucleases, in order to close the single‐stranded gap and terminate further resection.     

Structure-based predictions of Rad1, Rad9, Hus1 and Rad17 participation in sliding clamp and clamp-loading complexes

The repair of damaged DNA is coupled to the completion of DNA replication by several cell cycle checkpoint proteins, including, for example, in fission yeast Rad1^Sp, Hus1^Sp, Rad9^Sp and Rad17^Sp. We have found that these four proteins are conserved with protein sequences throughout eukaryotic evolution. Using computational techniques, including fold recognition, comparative modeling and generalized sequence profiles, we have made high confidence structure predictions for the each of the Rad1, Hus1 and Rad9 protein families (Rad17^Sc, Mec3^Sc and Ddc1^Sc in budding yeast, respectively). Each of these families was found to share a common protein fold with that of PCNA, the sliding clamp protein that tethers DNA polymerase to its template. We used previously reported genetic and biochemical data for these proteins from yeast and human cells to predict a heterotrimeric PCNA-like ring structure for the functional Rad1/Rad9/Hus1 complex and to determine their exact order within it. In addition, for each individual protein family, contact regions with neighbors within the PCNA-like ring were identified. Based on a molecular model for Rad17^Sp, we concluded that members of this family, similar to the subunits of the RFC clamp-loading complex, are capable of coupling ATP binding with conformational changes required to load a sliding clamp onto DNA. This model substantiates previous findings regarding the behavior of Rad17 family proteins upon DNA damage and within the RFC complex of clamp-loading proteins.     

Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9

We screened radiation-sensitive yeast mutants for DNA damage checkpoint defects and identified Dot1, the conserved histone H3 Lys 79 methyltransferase. DOT1 deletion mutants (dot1Delta) are G1 and intra-S phase checkpoint defective after ionizing radiation but remain competent for G2/M arrest. Mutations that affect Dot1 function such as Rad6-Bre1/Paf1 pathway gene deletions or mutation of H2B Lys 123 or H3 Lys 79 share dot1Delta checkpoint defects. Whereas dot1Delta alone confers minimal DNA damage sensitivity, combining dot1Delta with histone methyltransferase mutations set1Delta and set2Delta markedly enhances lethality. Interestingly, set1Delta and set2Delta mutants remain G1 checkpoint competent, but set1Delta displays a mild S phase checkpoint defect. In human cells, H3 Lys 79 methylation by hDOT1L likely mediates recruitment of the signaling protein 53BP1 via its paired tudor domains to double-strand breaks (DSBs). Consistent with this paradigm, loss of Dot1 prevents activation of the yeast 53BP1 ortholog Rad9 or Chk2 homolog Rad53 and decreases binding of Rad9 to DSBs after DNA damage. Mutation of Rad9 to alter tudor domain binding to methylated Lys 79 phenocopies the dot1Delta checkpoint defect and blocks Rad53 phosphorylation. These results indicate a key role for chromatin and methylation of histone H3 Lys 79 in yeast DNA damage signaling.     

Srs2 enables checkpoint recovery by promoting disassembly of DNA damage foci from chromatin

Following DNA repair, checkpoint signalling must be abated to resume cell cycling in a phenomenon known as checkpoint recovery. Although a number of genes have been implicated in the recovery process, it is still unknown whether checkpoint recovery is caused by a signalling network activated by DNA repair or whether it is the result of the loss of DNA structures that elicit the checkpoint. Here we show that checkpoint recovery can be uncoupled from bulk chromosome DNA repair if single-stranded (ss) DNA persists. This situation occurs in cells that are deficient in the Srs2 helicase, a protein that antagonizes Rad51. We report that srs2Δ cells fail to eliminate Ddc2 and RPA subnuclear foci following bulk chromosome repair due to the persistence of ssDNA. In contrast to cells with DNA double-strand breaks that remain unrepaired, srs2Δ cells remove the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp from chromatin after repair. However, despite the loss of the 9-1-1 clamp, Dpb11 remains associated with chromatin to promote checkpoint activity. Our work indicates that Srs2 promotes checkpoint recovery by removing Rad51 after DNA repair. A failure to remove Rad51 causes persistence of ssDNA and the checkpoint signal. Therefore, we conclude that cells initiate recovery when the DNA structures that elicit the checkpoint are eliminated.     

Molecular cloning and tissue-specific expression of Mrad9, a murine orthologue of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad9+ checkpoint control gene

We have isolated a murine cDNA, Mrad9, that is orthologous to the fission yeast rad9⁺ and human HRAD9 genes. Mrad9 encodes a 389 amino acid long, 42,032 Dalton protein that is 27% identical and 56% similar to Rad9p, and 82% identical and 88% similar to HRAD9, at the amino acid level. Expression of the Mrad9 cDNA in Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad9::ura4⁺ cells restores nearly wild-type levels of hydroxyurea resistance and early S phase checkpoint control to mutant fission yeast cell populations. However, UV resistance is only minimally restored, and mutant cells remain sensitive to gamma radiation. Mrad9 genomic DNA was isolated from a mouse 129/SvEv library. The Mrad9 gene was localized to a 15-kbp genomic DNA fragment, and contains 10 exons separated by 9 introns. Northern blot analysis indicates that the gene is expressed in many different tissues of the adult mouse, but the mRNA is most abundant in the heart and present at very low levels in the liver. These studies demonstrate the existence of a murine orthologue of the fission yeast rad9⁺ gene and underscore at least the partial evolutionary conservation of rad9⁺-dependent checkpoint control mechanisms. J. Cell. Physiol. 177:241–247, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK is required for DNA damage checkpoint activation

The DNA damage checkpoint controls cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage, and activation of this checkpoint is in turn cell cycle-regulated. Rad9, the ortholog of mammalian 53BP1, is essential for this checkpoint response and is phosphorylated by the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Previous studies suggested that the CDK consensus sites of Rad9 are important for its checkpoint activity. However, the precise CDK sites of Rad9 involved have not been determined. Here we show that CDK consensus sites of Rad9 function in parallel to its BRCT domain toward checkpoint activation, analogous to its fission yeast ortholog Crb2. Unlike Crb2, however, mutation of multiple rather than any individual CDK site of Rad9 is required to completely eliminate its checkpoint activity in vivo. Although Dpb11 interacts with CDK-phosphorylated Rad9, we provide evidence showing that elimination of this interaction does not affect DNA damage checkpoint activation in vivo, suggesting that additional pathway(s) exist. Taken together, these findings suggest that the regulation of Rad9 by CDK and the role of Dpb11 in DNA damage checkpoint activation are more complex than previously suggested. We propose that multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK may provide a more robust system to allow Rad9 to control cell cycle-dependent DNA damage checkpoint activation.     

高质量抗体揭示Rad1蛋白在细胞中新的潜在活动机理

一组在进化上(从酵母到人)保守的基因Rad9、Rad1和Hus1在细胞周期监控点调控和DNA损伤修复中发挥重要作用．这三个蛋白可以形成环形异源三聚体,即9-1-1蛋白复合体．9-1-1复合体被认为是Rad9、Rad1和Hus1行使功能的主要形式．到目前为止,没有一个好的抗Rad1的抗体,严重阻碍了对Rad1和9-1-1复合体的研究．在本研究中,我们成功地制备了一株小鼠抗Rad1蛋白的单克隆抗体．这个抗体能够有效地检测小鼠和人的内源Rad1蛋白,可以用于酶联免疫吸附、蛋白质免疫印迹、免疫共沉淀和免疫荧光等实验．利用该抗体,我们发现在DNA损伤剂羟基脲(HU)的诱导下,小鼠Rad1蛋白在Rad9^+/+小鼠胚胎干细胞中表达明显增加,而在Rad9^-/-的小鼠胚胎干细胞中没有观察到该现象,这表明Rad9对Rad1的蛋白表达有调控作用．此外,内源的Rad1蛋白主要分布在细胞质中,在HU处理后并没有迁移进入细胞核的现象,这与先前广泛被人们所接受的在DNA损伤压力下Rad1和Hus1能够迁移进入细胞核并与Rad9形成9-1-1蛋白复合体的说法相矛盾．综合看来,Rad1和9-1-1蛋白复合体的分子作用机制比预期的要复杂,我们成功制备的Rad1单克隆抗体将成为研究Rad1以及9-1-1蛋白复合体的强有力的工具．     

Human DNA damage checkpoint protein hRAD9 is a 3' to 5' exonuclease

Human RAD9 protein (hRAD9) is a homolog of the fission yeast Rad9 protein, one of the six so-called checkpoint Rad proteins involved in the early steps of DNA damage checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. It has been shown previously that, in vivo, a highly modified form of hRAD9 makes a ternary complex with two other checkpoint Rad proteins, hRAD1 and hHUS1 (Volkmer, E., and Karnitz, L. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 567-570; St. Onge, R. P., Udell, C. M., Casselman, R., and Davey, S. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell. 10, 1985-1995). However, the function of this complex is not known at present. To help define the functions of checkpoint Rad proteins in humans, we expressed hRAD9 in Escherichia coli, purified the recombinant protein and characterized it. We found that hRAD9 is a 3' to 5' exonuclease and located the nuclease active site to the region between residues 51 and 91 of the 391-amino acid-long protein. Our results suggest that exonucleolytic processing of primary DNA lesion by hRAD9 may contribute to DNA damage checkpoint response in humans.     

Nuclear factories for signalling and repairing DNA double strand breaks in living fission yeast

In mammalian and budding yeast cells treated with genotoxic agents, different proteins implicated in detecting, signalling or repairing DNA lesions form nuclear foci. We studied foci formed by proteins involved in these processes in living fission yeast cells, which is amenable to genetic and molecular analysis. Using fluorescent tags, we analysed subnuclear localisations of the DNA damage checkpoint protein Rad9, of the homologous recombination protein Rad22 and of PCNA, which are implicated in many aspects of DNA metabolism. After inducing double strand breaks (DSBs) with ionising radiations, Rad22, Rad9 and PCNA form a low number of nuclear foci. Rad9 recruitment to foci depends on the presence of Rad1, Hus1 and Rad17, but is independent of downstream checkpoint effectors and of homologous recombination proteins. Likewise, Rad22 and PCNA form foci despite inactive homologous recombination repair and impaired DNA damage checkpoint. Rad22 and Rad9 foci co-localise completely, whereas PCNA co-localises with Rad22 and Rad9 only partially. Foci do not disassemble in cells unable to repair DNA by homologous recombination. Thus, in fission yeast, DSBs are detected by the DNA damage checkpoint and are repaired by homologous recombination at a few spatially confined subnuclear compartments where Rad22, Rad9 and PCNA concentrate independently.