Manufacturing and characterization of extracellular vesicles from umbilical cord–derived mesenchymal stromal cells for clinical testing

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may deliver therapeutic effects that are comparable to their parental cells. MSC-EVs are promising agents for the treatment of a variety of diseases. To reach the intermediate goal of clinically testing safety and efficacy of EVs, strategies should strive for efficient translation of current EV research. On the basis of our in vitro an in vivo findings regarding the biological actions of EVs and our experience in manufacturing biological stem cell therapeutics for routine use and clinical testing, we discuss strategies of manufacturing and quality control of umbilical cord–derived MSC-EVs. We introduce guidelines of good manufacturing practice and their practicability along the path from the laboratory to the patient. We present aspects of manufacturing and final product quality testing and highlight the principle of “The process is the product.” The approach presented in this perspective article may facilitate translational research during the development of complex biological EV-based therapeutics in a very early stage of manufacturing as well as during early clinical safety and proof-of-concept testing.     

Effect of novel arecoline thiazolidinones as muscarinic receptor 1 agonist in Alzheimer's dementia models

The discovery of cholinergic deficit in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patient's brain has triggered research efforts, using cholinomimetic approaches for their efficacy in AD therapy. Various therapies may be of potential clinical use in AD. Among these are cholinergic agents, which include muscarinic agonists, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and acetylcholine releasing agents. One of the muscarinic agonists tested in AD is arecoline and its bioisosters, which are widely explored as muscarinic receptor 1 agonist (M1 receptor agonist) in AD research. In this regard, five-membered heterocyclic ring system attached arecoline basic nucleus (N-methyl tetrahydropyridines) at third position has been extensively researched on. The present research involved synthesis of arecoline thiazolidinones 5(a-j) by using dipolar addition of 3-aminopyridine and alkyl/aryl carboxaldehydes in presence of gamma ferrite as catalyst. The resulting products were methylated and reduced to get desired products. Subsequently the synthesized arecoline thiazolidinones were subjected to in vitro muscarinic receptor binding studies using male Wistar rat brain (cerebral cortex) membrane homogenate and extended this in vitro study to in vivo pharmacological evaluation of memory and learning in male Wistar rats. Four derivatives (5a-5c and 5e) showed considerable M1 receptor binding affinity (in vitro) and elicited beneficial effects in vivo memory and learning models (Rodent memory evaluation, plus and Y maze studies).     

Estrogen receptor ligands counteract cognitive deficits caused by androgen deprivation in male rats

Androgen deprivation causes impairment of cognitive tasks in rodents and humans, and this deficit can be reverted by androgen replacement therapy. Part of the effects of androgens in the male may be mediated by their local metabolism to estradiol or 3-alpha androstanediol within the brain and the consequent activation of estrogen receptors. In this study we have assessed whether the administration of estradiol benzoate, the estrogen receptor β selective agonist diarylpropionitrile or the estrogen receptor α selective agonist propyl pyrazole triol affect performance of androgen-deprived male Wistar rats in the cross-maze test. In addition, we tested the effect of raloxifene and tamoxifen, two selective estrogen receptor modulators used in clinical practice. The behavior of the rats was assessed 2 weeks after orchidectomy or sham surgery. Orchidectomy impaired acquisition in the cross-maze test. Estradiol benzoate and the selective estrogen receptor β agonist significantly improved acquisition in the cross-maze test compared to orchidectomized animals injected with vehicle. Raloxifene and tamoxifen at a dose of 1 mg/kg, but not at doses of 0.5 or 2 mg/kg, also improved acquisition of orchidectomized animals. Our findings suggest that estrogenic compounds with affinity for estrogen receptor β and selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as raloxifene and tamoxifen, may represent good candidates to promote cognitive performance in androgen-deprived males.     

Selective oestrogen receptor modulators

Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are compounds which act like oestrogens in some target tissues but which antagonise their effects in others. The first example of a SERM (referred to as a first-generation compound) was tamoxifen, for which oestrogen-like agonist activity on bone was seen to occur simultaneously with oestrogen antagonist activity on the breast. An unwanted effect of tamoxifen was its oestrogen-like action on the endometrium. Second-generation compounds have since been developed, most notably raloxifene, which has oestrogen-like actions on bone, lipids and the coagulation system, and oestrogen antagonist effects on the breast and uterus. Raloxifene has undergone very extensive, prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised trial evaluation, in which anti-fracture efficacy (to date only for vertebral fracture) has been accompanied by a major reduction in the incidence of new breast cancer. The compound is similar to placebo in its uterine effects, and similar to oestrogen in causing a two- to threefold increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism. Its lipid effects are similar to those of oestrogen, except for a relatively small effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and no significant effect on triglycerides. Data on cardiovascular event rates are not yet available; data on cognitive function are preliminary and, to date, reassuring. The mechanisms by which the same compound can exert oestrogen agonist effects on one target and antagonist effects on another are still being clarified. Important aspects include the fact that the oestrogen receptor undergoes different conformational changes according to the ligand. Thus the crystal structure of oestradiol bound to the oestrogen receptor differs from that of raloxifene bound to the same receptor. The existence of two oestrogen receptor subtypes may also be relevant. Mechanisms include differing interactions with various domains of the oestrogen receptor, and tissue-specific recruitment of steroid receptor co-activators and co-repressors may underlie some of the tissue-specific effects. The SERMs may be the prototype for other selective steroid receptor modulators, for example the androgen and progesterone receptors. The development of tissue target-specific agents is an exciting advance in endocrine pharmacology and can be extended to agents, such as tibolone, which exert some of their tissue specificity through their metabolites.     

Signal transduction by steroid hormones: nuclear localization is differentially regulated in estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors.

The glucocorticoid receptor accumulates in nuclei only in the presence of bound hormone, whereas the estrogen receptor has been reported to be constitutively nuclear. To investigate this distinction, we compared the nuclear localization domains of the two receptors and the capacity of their respective hormone-binding regions to regulate nuclear localization activity. As with the glucocorticoid receptor, we showed that the human estrogen receptor contained a nuclear localization signal between the DNA-binding and hormone-binding regions (amino acids 256-303); however, in contrast to the glucocorticoid receptor, the estrogen receptor lacked a second nuclear localization domain within the hormone-binding region. Moreover, the hormone-binding domain of the unliganded estrogen receptor failed to regulate nuclear localization signals, although it efficiently regulated other receptor functions. We conclude that the two receptors employ a common mechanism for signal transduction involving a novel "inactivation" function, but that they differ in their control of nuclear localization. Thus, despite the strong relatedness of the estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors in structure and activity, certain differences in their properties could have important functional implications.     

Crosstalk between ER stress and immunogenic cell death

Preclinical and clinical findings suggest that tumor-specific immune responses may be responsible – at least in part – for the clinical success of therapeutic regimens that rely on immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers, including anthracyclines and oxaliplatin. The molecular pathways whereby some, but not all, cytotoxic agents promote bona fide ICD remain to be fully elucidated. Nevertheless, a central role for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response has been revealed in all scenarios of ICD described thus far. Hence, components of the ER stress machinery may constitute clinically relevant druggable targets for the induction of ICD. In this review, we will summarize recent findings in the field of ICD research with a special focus on ER stress mechanisms and their implication for cancer therapy.     

Translational science: past, present, and future

The concept of translational science is at least 15 years old. However, in its most recent incarnation, it represents the identification of a funding category designed to encourage academic participation in a critical stage of the drug discovery and product development process. It is hoped that this will make the process both shorter and more efficient. In this review, the author first considers the historical development of the pharmaceutical R&D process. The place of translational science in the process, the scientific techniques involved, and aspects of the business environment necessary for its success are then considered. Translational science does not displace preclinical development. Both concepts are relevant to the paramount importance of successfully and expeditiously bridging the gap between preclinical science and clinical testing, "from bench to bedside." Translational science is particularly likely to stimulate biomarker research in the universities and related business community and will probably give a modest boost to early clinical testing and commercialization of discoveries within the academic setting. Whether there will be a consequent improvement in the quality and efficiency of the overall process remains to be seen.     

The glucocorticoid antagonist 17 alpha-methyltestosterone binds to the 10 S glucocorticoid receptor and blocks agonist-mediated dissociation of the 10 S oligomer to the 4 S deoxyribonucleic acid-binding subunit

The glucocorticoid antagonist 17 alpha-methyltestosterone inhibits binding of the agonist [3H]triamcinolone acetonide ot the glocucorticoid receptor in cytosol prepared from rat pituitary tumor GH1 cells. Competitive binding studies indicate that the dissociation constant for 17 alpha-methyltestosterone is about 1 microM. After incubation of intact GH1 cells with 10 nM [3H]triamcinolone acetonide at 37 C and subsequent cell fractionation at 4 C, three glucocorticoid receptor forms are observed: cytosolic 10 S receptor, cytosolic 4 S receptor, and nuclear receptor. Concurrent incubation with 17 alpha-methyltestosterone reduces the amount of [3H]triamcinolone acetonide bound to each of these receptor forms. Ligand-exchange assays performed at 0 C in intact cells using [3H]triamcinolone acetonide show that the exchangeable antagonist is associated predominantly with cytosolic 10 S receptor. Immunochemical analysis using monoclonal antibody BuGR2 indicates that 17 alpha-methyltestosterone does not cause substantial accumulation of glucocorticoid receptors in GH1 cell nuclei and, when present together with agonist, reduces nuclear accumulation of receptor seen with agonist alone. Results from dense amino acid labeling studies show that unlike [3H]triamcinolone acetonide, 17 alpha-methyltestosterone does not reduce the total amount of cellular glucocorticoid receptor and does not reduce receptor half-life. These results are consistent with a model for glucocorticoid receptor transformation in which binding of agonist promotes the dissociation of an oligomeric 10 S cytosolic receptor protein to its DNA-binding 4 S subunit. The antagonist 17 alpha-methyltestosterone competes with agonist for binding to the 10 S cytosolic receptor but does not appear to promote dissociation of the oligomer, thus inhibiting agonist-mediated nuclear actions of the glucocorticoid receptor.     

Estrogen-like effects of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene on the female rat hypothalamo-pituitary axis

We have recently demonstrated that 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA), a potent inducer of mammary tumors in rodents, can in vitro decrease the number of membrane dopamine D2 receptors and stimulate prolactin (PRL) release, by direct estrogen-like actions on anterior pituitary. In the present study, we tested the ability of DMBA to mimic the in vivo estradiol (17 beta E2) effects on pituitary D2 receptors and on PRL as well as LH release. We have found that DMBA, like 17 beta E2, when injected to ovariectomized rats, induced a decrease in the number of anterior pituitary D2 receptors, a release of PRL and exerted a biphasic (acute negative and longer term positive) action on LH secretion. We thus examined the ability of DMBA to interact with 17 beta E2 receptors in the hypothalamo-pituitary axis: DMBA binds to the pituitary cytosolic estrogen receptors with an affinity 0.001% that of 17 beta E2. Finally [3H]DMBA binds to hypothalamus-containing brain sections. This binding was displaced partially by RU 2858 a pure estrogen agonist and totally by tamoxifen, a purported estrogen antagonist. No competition for [3H]DMBA binding was observed with an androgen (RU 1881) or a glucocorticoid (RU 26988) agonist. From these data, it may be concluded that DMBA can act as a partial estrogen in pituitary and hypothalamic tissues.     

Selective regulation of bone cell apoptosis by translational isoforms of the glucocorticoid receptor

Glucocorticoids are widely used in the treatment of inflammatory and other diseases. However, high-dose or chronic administration often triggers troublesome side effects such as metabolic syndrome and osteoporosis. We recently described that one glucocorticoid receptor gene produces eight translational glucocorticoid receptor isoforms that have distinct gene-regulatory abilities. We show here that specific, but not all, glucocorticoid receptor isoforms induced apoptosis in human osteosarcoma U-2 OS bone cells. Whole human genome microarray analysis revealed that the majority of the glucocorticoid target genes were selectively regulated by specific glucocorticoid receptor isoforms. Real-time PCR experiments confirmed that proapoptotic enzymes necessary for cell death, granzyme A and caspase-6, were induced by specific glucocorticoid receptor isoforms. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays further suggested that glucocorticoid receptor isoform-dependent induction of proapoptotic genes was likely due to selective coregulator recruitment and chromatin modification. Interestingly, the capabilities to transrepress proinflammatory genes were similar among glucocorticoid receptor isoforms. Together, these findings provide new evidence that translational glucocorticoid receptor isoforms can elicit distinct glucocorticoid responses and may be useful for the development of safe glucocorticoids with reduced side effects.     

Genetic and pharmacologic strategies to determine the function of estrogen receptor α and estrogen receptor β in cardiovascular system

Background: The biological functions of estrogens extend beyond the female and male reproductive tract, affecting the cardiovascular and renal systems. Traditional views on the role of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) in protecting against heart disease, which were challenged by clinical end point studies that found adverse effects of combined HT, are now being replaced by more differentiated concepts suggesting a beneficial role of early and unopposed HT that does not include a progestin.Objective: We reviewed recent insights, concepts, and research results on the biology of both estrogen receptor (ER) subtypes, ERα and ERβ, in cardiac and vascular tissues. Knowledge of these ER subtypes is crucial to understanding gender and estrogen effects and to developing novel, exciting strategies that may have a profound clinical impact.Methods: This review focuses on in vivo studies and includes data presented at the August 2007 meeting of the American Physiological Society as well as data from a search of the MEDLINE and Ovid databases from January 1986 to November 2007. Search results were restricted to English-language publications, using the following search terms: estrogen, estrogen receptor α, estrogen receptor β, estrogen receptor α agonist, estrogen receptor α antagonist, estrogen receptor β agonist, estrogen receptor β antagonist, PPT, DPN, heart, vasculature, ERKO mice, BERKO mice, transgenic mice, and knockout mice.Results: Genetic mouse models and pharmacologic studies that employed selective as well as nonselective ER agonists support the concept that both ER subtypes confer protective effects in experimental models of human heart disease, including hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and chronic heart failure.Conclusions: Genetic models and novel ligands hold the promise of further improving our understanding of estrogen action in multiple tissues and organs. These efforts will ultimately enhance the safety and efficacy of HT and may also result in new applications for synthetic female sex hormone analogues.     

MCF-7; a human breast cancer cell line with estrogen, androgen, progesterone, and glucocorticoid receptors.

We have identified receptors for glucocorticoids, progestins, and androgens in a human breast tumor cell line (MCF-7) known to have estrogen receptor. Sucrose density gradients show that MCF-7 cytosol contains approximately 100 fm/mg protein estradiol (E2-3H) receptor, more than 300 fm/mg protein progesterone receptor (measured with R5020-3H), about 40 fm/mg protein 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (5alpha-DHT-3H) receptor, and 800 fm/mg glucocorticoid receptor (measured with dexamethasone-3H). Dissociation constants obtained by Scatchard analyses were approximately 0.6 x 10(-10)M (E2), 1 x 10(-9)M (R5020), 2.8 x 10(-10)M (5alpha-DHT) and 8 x 10(-9)M (dexamethasone). No cross competition was found for estrogen receptor, but progestins competed for androgen and glucocorticoid binding. The androgen, but not the glucocorticoid, partially competed for R5020 binding to progesterone receptor. This first demonstration of 4 classes of steroid receptors in human breast cancer means that MCF-7 may be an excellent in vitro model for studying the mechanism of tumor response to endocrine therapy as well as the complex relationships between binding and biological actions of these hormones.     

Role of nonhuman primate models in the discovery and clinical development of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs)

Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) represent a new class of progesterone receptor ligands that exert clinically relevant tissue-selective progesterone agonist, antagonist, partial, or mixed agonist/antagonist effects on various progesterone target tissues in an in vivo situation depending on the biological action studied. The SPRM asoprisnil is being studied in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata and endometriosis. Asoprisnil shows a high degree of uterine selectivity as compared to effects on ovulation or ovarian hormone secretion in humans. It induces amenorrhea and decreases leiomyoma volume in a dose-dependent manner in the presence of follicular phase estrogen concentrations. It also has endometrial antiproliferative effects. In pregnant animals, the myometrial, i.e. labor-inducing, effects of asoprisnil are blunted or absent. Studies in non-human primates played a key role during the preclinical development of selective progesterone receptor modulators. These studies provided the first evidence of uterus-selective effects of asoprisnil and structurally related compounds, and the rationale for clinical development of asoprisnil.