The role of experience and chemical alarm signalling in predator recognition by fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas

Young-of-the-year, predator-naive fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas , from a pikesympatric population did not respond to chemical stimuli from northern pike, Esox Indus , while wild-caught fish of the same age and size did. These results suggest that chemical predator recognition is a result of previous experience and not genetic factors, Wild young-of-the-year minnows responded to pike odour with a response intensity that was similar to that of older fish, demonstrating that the ability to recognize predators is learned within the first year. The intensity of response of wild minnows which had been maintained in a predator free environment for 1 year was similar to that of recently caught minnows of the same age, suggesting that reinforcement was not required for predator recognition to be retained. Naive minnows that were exposed simultaneously to chemical stimuli from pike (a neutral stimulus) and minnow alarm substance exhibited a fright response upon subsequent exposure to the pike stimulus alone. Predator-naive minnows exposed simultaneously to chemical stimuli from pike and glass-distilled water did not exhibit a fright response to the pike stimulus alone. These results demonstrate that fathead minnows can acquire predator recognition through releaserinduced recognition learning, thus confirming a known mechanism through which alarm substance may benefit the receivers of an alarm signal.     

Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) learn to recognize chemical stimuli from high-risk habitats by the presence of alarm substance

We exposed fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) to water fromone of two distinct habitat types (an open water site or a vegetatedcover site in the same stream) that we mixed with either alarmsubstance or a distilled water control. Upon subsequent exposuresto the habitat waters alone, minnows showed a fright responseto the habitat water that they received in conjunction withalarm substance but not to the other habitat water. These resultsindicate that minnows can learn to recognize high-risk habitatsbased on the association of habitat specific chemical cues withalarm substance. The ability to recognize these habitats couldpotentially lower the minnows' risk of predation. These resultsprovide evidence of a long-term benefit to receivers of a chemicalalarm signal.     

Chemical alarm signals increase the survival time of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) during encounters with northern pike (Esox Lucius)

We tested the hypothesis that exposure to a conspecific alarmpheromone improves survival of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas)during staged encounters with an unfamiliar predator (northernpike: Esox luaus). Minnows exposed to the alarm pheromone survived39. 5% longer than controls. This difference in survival timeappeared to result not from direct inhibition of the pike butrather from some aspect of the minnows' antipredator behavior.Minnows exhibited significant increases in both shoaling andshelter use after exposure to the alarm pheromone. For controlminnows, the degree of shoaling was positively correlated withsurvival time, suggesting that increased shoaling is an effectiveantipredator response. This study provides the first directexperimental evidence that chemical alarm signals in fishesimprove survival of receivers.     

Fathead minnows avoid conspedfic and heterospedfic alarm pheromones in the faeces of northern pike

Groups of fathead minnows Pimephales promelas were tested to determine if they avoided areas of a test tank labelled with the faeces of a predator (northern pike, Esox lucius ) which had recently been fed minnows, brook sticklebacks Culaea inconstans , or swordtails Xiphophorus helleri. Minnows exhibited a fright reaction upon presentation of sponges labelled with faeces, when the pike had consumed minnows or sticklebacks, but not swordtails (which lack alarm pheromones). The fright reaction was characterized by increased shoal cohesiveness and increased dashing and freezing behaviour. Minnows avoided the area of the tank containing the faeces from pike on diets of minnows or sticklebacks, but not from pike fed a diet of swordtails. These data demonstrate that: (1) minnows actively avoid the faeces of pike fed minnows or brook sticklebacks, and (2) minnows exhibit a fright reaction to the faeces of a pike fed brook sticklebacks.     

Differential learning rates of chemical versus visual cues of a northern pike by fathead minnows in a natural habitat

We stocked 39 juvenile pike, Esox lucius, into a previously pike free pond which contained a population of approximately 78 000 fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. Fathead minnows sampled prior to pike stocking did not show a stereotypic fright response to either visual or chemical cues from pike. After stocking pike, we sampled minnows every two days for a period of two weeks. Minnows sampled six days after stocking still did not show a fright response to the sight of a pike, but those sampled eight days after stocking did exhibit a significant fright response, indicating that acquired predator recognition based on vision occurred between six and eight days. Minnows sampled two days after stocking did not show a fright response to chemical cues of a pike. Those sampled four days after did, however, exhibit a significant fright response, indicating that acquired predator recognition based on chemical cues occurred between two and four days. These data indicate that acquired predator recognition occurs very rapidly and that the rate of learning of predator identity differs for chemical versus visual cues.     

Effects of exposure to predatory cues on territorial behaviour of male fathead minnows

We conducted a laboratory study to determine if male fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, altered their territorial behaviour associated with reproduction in response to combinations of visual and chemical cues from northern pike, Esox lucius. We introduced the following stimuli to a territorial male: a brick (control), fathead minnow alarm pheromone, a pike fed brook stickleback, Culea inconstans, or a pike fed fathead minnow. The territorial behaviour of males did not change when the control was added. Male minnows experiencing threat from pike fed stickleback significantly reduced the frequency at which they performed three territorial behaviours, but, within 12 h, had returned to pre-exposure activity levels. Male minnows subjected to alarm pheromone alone and to pike fed fathead minnow significantly reduced their territorial behaviour, abandoned their nests, and did not return to pre-exposure levels of activity after 24 h. We suggest that because risk of predation triggers prolonged decreases in territorial defense, it may affect competition between nesting males and female mate choice. We conclude that fathead minnows can assess the severity of predatory threat and adjust their reproductive behaviour accordingly.     

Survival of fathead minnows after injury by predators and its possible role in the evolution of alarm signals

Synopsis Some mechanisms proposed to account for the evolution of animal alarm signals require that the signal sender survive in order to benefit. The ostariophysan alarm pheromone system requires mechanical damage for the release of the alarm pheromone. A natural situation is described in which up to 16% of the fathead minnows in a population have survived damaging encounters with predators. This indicates that post-signal selective benefits can operate in the evolution of the ostariophysan alarm system.     

Substitution of top predators: effects of pike invasion in a subarctic lake

1. Invasions of top predators may have strong cascading effects in ecosystems affecting both prey species abundance and lower trophic levels. A recently discussed factor that may enhance species invasion is climate change and in this context, we studied the effects of an invasion of northern pike into a subarctic lake ecosystem formerly inhabited by the native top predator Arctic char and its prey fish, ninespined stickleback. 2. Our study demonstrated a strong change in fish community composition from a system with Arctic char as top predator and high densities of sticklebacks to a system with northern pike as top predator and very low densities of sticklebacks. A combination of both predation and competition from pike is the likely cause of the extinction of char. 3. The change in top predator species also cascaded down to primary consumers as both zooplankton and predator‐sensitive macroinvertebrates increased in abundance. 4. Although the pike invasion coincided with increasing summer temperatures in the study area we have no conclusive evidence that the temperature increase is the causal mechanism behind the pike invasion. But still, our study provides possible effects of future pike invasions in mountain lakes related to climate change. We suggest that future pike invasions will have strong effects in lake ecosystems, both by replacing native top consumers and through cascading effects on lower trophic levels.     

Antipredator responses to skin extract of redbelly dace, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Phoxinus eos, </Emphasis>by free-ranging populations of redbelly dace and fathead minnows,<Emphasis Type="Italic">Pimephales promelas</Emphasis>

Synopsis Fishes in the superorder Ostariophysi possess specialized epidermal cells that contain a chemical alarm cue. The alarm cue is released when the skin is damaged during a predatory attack. Therefore, the cue serves as a reliable indicator of predation risk to nearby conspecifics and ecologically similar heterospecifics with which it shares predators. Antipredator behavior in response to these alarm cues has been demonstrated in numerous studies in confined spaces (laboratory aquaria, field traps, fluvarium). When tested on a natural field population however, behavioral response has been inconsistent. Here, we expose free-ranging redbelly dace and fathead minnows to skin extract of redbelly dace and record their behavioral response with an underwater video camera. We observed avoidance of areas in which skin extract was introduced, but no avoidance of areas in which water (control) was introduced. These data confirm the ecological function of skin extract in mediating predator–prey interactions in aquatic habitats, and argue against the hypothesis that alarm reactions are an artifact of confined spaces.     

Sound the alarm: learned association of predation risk with novel auditory stimuli by fathead minnows ( Pimephales promelas ) and glowlight tetras ( Hemigrammus erythrozonus ) after single simultaneous pairings with conspecific chemical alarm cues

Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, and glowlight tetras, Hemigrammus erythrozonus, were tested for their ability to associate predation risk with novel auditory stimuli after auditory stimuli were presented simultaneously with chemical alarm cues. Minnows and tetras gave a fright response when exposed to skin extract (alarm cue) and an artificial auditory sound stimulus, but no response to water (control) and sound, indicating that they did not have a pre-existing aversion to the auditory stimulus. When retested with sound stimuli alone, minnows and glowlight tetras that had previously been conditioned with water and sound showed no response, but those that had been conditioned with alarm cues and sound exhibited antipredator behaviour (reduced activity) in response to the auditory cue. This is the first known demonstration of learned association of an auditory cue with predation risk, and raises questions about the role of sound in mediating predator-prey interactions in fishes.