Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: why patience is a virtue! The case for salvage radiation therapy

Without reliable clinical or pathologic predictors of local recurrence, selection of patients for adjuvant radiotherapy based on any combination of clinical or pathological parameters is bound to lead to the unnecessary treatment of significant numbers of patients whose disease might not have ultimately recurred or who might have been destined to have recurrence with extrapelvic metastatic disease, for which pelvic radiation would be ineffective. Furthermore, new ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays can identify patients actually failing surgery with a detectable and rising PSA earlier than ever, when disease volume is low and still amenable to salvage radiation therapy, and can allow the calculation of the PSA doubling time, which is gaining widespread acceptance as a proven predictor of response to salvage radiation therapy in this setting. Therefore, the rationale for preemptive adjuvant radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy is weaker than ever.     

Prostate cancer in elderly men

Due to increasing life expectancy and the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, a rising number of elderly men are diagnosed with prostate cancer. Besides PSA serum levels and Gleason score, age is considered to be a key prognostic factor in terms of treatment decisions. In men older than 70 years, treatment without curative intent may deprive the frail patient of years of life. Modern radical prostatectomy techniques are associated with low perioperative morbidity, excellent clinical outcome, and documented long-term disease control. Thus, radical prostatectomy should be considered because local treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer potentially cures disease. The huge extent of PSA screening programs may lead to overdiagnosis of prostate cancer. Not every man who is diagnosed with prostate cancer will develop clinically significant disease. This has led to the concept of expectant management for screen-detected, small-volume, low-grade disease, with the intention of providing therapy for those men with disease progression.     

Biochemical (Prostate-Specific Antigen) Relapse: An Oncologist's Perspective

Consensus has not been reached on the exact definition of biochemical relapse after prostatectomy; individual institution definitions of relapse after prostatectomy range from consecutively rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of > 0.2 to > 0.6 ng/mL. PSA measurements after radiation are even less predictable. PSA level is a sensitive marker of occult prostate-cancer relapse and provides early notification of recurrence, but a PSA relapse does not equal a clinical relapse or death from prostate cancer. Data are reviewed from retrospective, single-institution trials that have clarified features of PSA relapse after both prostatectomy and radiation, such as the PSA doubling time and the time to the first PSA elevation, which are associated with clinical progression. Various options for treatment of biochemical relapse are also reviewed; these include hormone therapy, combined chemohormonal therapy, alternative medicine and dietary tactics, new agents, and future strategies, such as vaccination. Currently, there is no standard treatment for biochemical failure with proven benefit in terms of quality of life, time to metastases, or survival. Current options include observation for patients with long PSA doubling times or comorbid medical issues and standard or nontraditional hormone therapy or a clinical trial for men who desire early therapy or who have rapid PSA doubling times (< 10-12 months). Trials combining the early use of chemotherapy with hormone therapy are promising. Patients should be encouraged to enroll in clinical trials to help establish standards of care.     

Treatment options after failure of radiation therapy-a review

Radioresistant or recurrent prostate cancer represents a serious health risk for approximately 20%-30% of patients treated with primary radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The majority of patients exhibit large volume and poorly differentiated disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the ability of salvage therapy to eradicate the cancer. Early detection with serum PSA monitoring and prostate needle biopsy following primary radiation therapy may identify residual adenocarcinoma at an earlier stage and increase the likelihood of successful salvage therapy. Radical prostatectomy, prostate cryoablation, and brachytherapy comprise the options for salvage treatment available for radiorecurrent prostate cancer. The goal of disease eradication must be balanced against the potential for serious treatment-related side effects. As a result, many patients receive noncurative therapy with androgen ablation despite the real risk of disease progression and mortality.     

E-1899: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study Comparing Ketoconazole Plus Hydrocortisone with Docetaxel Plus Estramustine for Asymptomatic, Androgen-Independent, Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Patients with Rising PSA Levels

Many prostate cancer patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy receive "early" hormonal therapy, despite its uncertain benefit. When these patients ultimately progress to androgen independence, their management remains controversial, with many receiving second-line hormonal therapy. Chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer has a defined palliative benefit; studies to establish its potential impact on survival are ongoing. E-1899 is an intergroup phase III trial comparing second-line hormonal therapy with ketoconazole plus hydrocortisone with docetaxel plus estramustine in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer with rising PSA levels who have no evidence of metastases.     

Management of clinically localized prostate cancer

Critics of screening have stated that early detection of prostate cancer does not necessarily reflect a diminishing death rate from the disease. However, several recent reports have demonstrated that the death rate from prostate cancer is decreasing, representing the most compelling validation for aggressive screening. Prostate cancer can be halted only if there is no evidence of systemic or regional metastases and the disease is confined to the surgical field or the radiation template. Surgeons and radiation oncologists must make a concerted effort to exclude men with regional and systemic metastases who are unlikely to benefit from treatment. With the widespread acceptance of prostate-specific antigen screening, a greater proportion of men are being diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer. Both radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are able to halt disease spread in this significant subset of men, but survival outcomes indicate that radical prostatectomy is a more reliable treatment than radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Overall, the immediate treatment-related morbidity of radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in the modern era is quite low. Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy appear to have a similar impact on continence and erectile function. There is a need for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies that can be utilized in those cases where radical prostatectomy and radiation are less likely to completely eradicate or destroy the cancer.     

Current Clinical Applications of the In-capromab Pendetide Scan (ProstaScint(R) Scan, Cyt-356)

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been extremely helpful in the detection of new or recurrent prostate cancer. However, localization of the recurrent tumor has been challenging with currently available radiographic modalities. The (111)In-capromab pendetide scan was developed to diagnose accurately and, more importantly, localize and stage a new or recurrent prostate cancer. Studies suggest that the (111)In-capromab pendetide scan can provide more accurate staging of clinically localized prostate cancer prior to staging lymphadenectomy or definitive therapy. It can also provide valuable information when local adjuvant radiation therapy is considered in men with biochemical cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy.     

The possible role of chromogranin A as a prognostic factor in organ-confined prostate cancer

The clinical significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in patients who have undergone surgery for localized prostate cancer is still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess the relationship between serum neuroendocrine markers and well-known prognostic factors in prostate cancer (pathological staging, definitive Gleason score and serum PSA) and to search for correlations between serum chromogranin A (CgA) levels and pathological findings. Forty-one consecutive patients who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were evaluated. Serum PSA, CgA and neuron-specific enolase were measured immediately before surgery. Twenty-six surgical specimens were phenotypically and immunohistochemically evaluated using an antibody against CgA. Significant correlations were found between serum CgA, pathological staging and Gleason score (p=0.049 and p=0.038, respectively). Serum CgA did not correlate with PSA, patient age, or immunohistochemical findings. There was a significant correlation between positive immunohistochemical CgA staining and Gleason score (p=0.014). An increase in serum CgA levels, independent of PSA values, might be the expression of pathologically more advanced tumor stage and higher Gleason score; this could help to identify a high-risk patient group eligible for adjuvant therapy.     

Cancer de la prostate : la maladie localisée

Localized prostate cancer is characterized by a tumor confined to the prostate gland at clinical evaluation. Since the onset of PSA screening, the detection of localized prostate cancer has increased. Prognosis factors are clinical stadification, PSA value, PSA doubling time, tumor volume related to needle biopsy pathologic findings (Gleason score, percentage biopsies involved). Treatment depends on tumor prognosis, symptoms and performance status of the patient. Localized prostate cancer can be treated by surgery (radical prostatectomy, high intensity focused ultrasound) or radiotherapy (conformational radiation therapy, brachytherapy). Active follow-up can be proposed to very low risk patients.     

TEP/TDM au 68Ga-PSMA-11 quand la 18F-fluorocholine ne localise pas la récidive biologique du cancer de la prostate : à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature

A rise in prostate-specific antigen serum level (PSA) is an increasing issue, which occurs in more than one third of the patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Thus, imaging these patients is of importance in order to localize residual disease and then to propose suitable therapy. The usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT in this indication has been demonstrated for several years. Recently, specific ligands of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), which is expressed by almost all prostate cancers, were labelled with PET radionuclides. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 (PSMA-11) PET/CT has been described as superior to FCH and conventional imaging to detect prostate cancer recurrence. We present the case of a patient with history of prostate cancer, treated by surgery, referred for a rise in PSA serum level and without any residual disease targeted neither on FCH, nor on pelvic MRI. The PSMA-11 PET/CT demonstrated a pelvic lymph node, which was suspect of recurrence and allowed to initiate a specific curative therapy, replacing the “palliative” hormonotherapy, which was planned. A short review of the literature on this topic, focusing on the published PSMA-11 performances and main known interpretation pitfalls.     

Serum methionine metabolites are risk factors for metastatic prostate cancer progression

Background

Clinical decision for primary treatment for prostate cancer is dictated by variables with insufficient specificity. Early detection of prostate cancer likely to develop rapid recurrence could support neo-adjuvant therapeutics and adjuvant options prior to frank biochemical recurrence. This study compared markers in serum and urine of patients with rapidly recurrent prostate cancer to recurrence-free patients after radical prostatectomy. Based on previous identification of urinary sarcosine as a metastatic marker, we tested whether methionine metabolites in urine and serum could serve as pre-surgical markers for aggressive disease.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Urine and serum samples (n = 54 and 58, respectively), collected at the time of prostatectomy were divided into subjects who developed biochemical recurrence within 2 years and those who remained recurrence-free after 5 years. Multiple methionine metabolites were measured in urine and serum by GC-MS. The role of serum metabolites and clinical variables (biopsy Gleason grade, clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen [PSA]) on biochemical recurrence prediction were evaluated. Urinary sarcosine and cysteine levels were significantly higher (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007 respectively) in the recurrent group. However, in serum, concentrations of homocysteine (p = 0.003), cystathionine (p = 0.007) and cysteine (p<0.001) were more abundant in the recurrent population. The inclusion of serum cysteine to a model with PSA and biopsy Gleason grade improved prediction over the clinical variables alone (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Higher serum homocysteine, cystathionine, and cysteine concentrations independently predicted risk of early biochemical recurrence and aggressiveness of disease in a nested case control study. The methionine metabolites further supplemented known clinical variables to provide superior sensitivity and specificity in multivariable prediction models for rapid biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy.     

Radiation therapy failure in prostate cancer patients: risk factors and methods of detection

Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostatic carcinoma remains one of the mainstays among therapeutic approaches; however, patients continue to fail radiation therapy at too high a rate. This article reviews the risk factors and methods of detection for prostate cancer recurrence. The relative merits of the three major pre-therapy prognostic indicators-TNM staging, Gleason score, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels-are discussed. The use of staging and Gleason score, as well as digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, and post-radiation prostate biopsies in detecting failure of radiation therapy is reviewed. Challenges relating to the use of serum PSA levels as an indicator of recurrence are examined. Finally, this article makes recommendations as to procedure for evaluating patients suspected of failing radiation therapy.     

Prostate cancer: progression of prostate-specific antigen after external beam irradiation

This paper is concerned with the development of a stochastic path of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radiation treatment for prostate cancer. PSA is a biomarker for prostate cancer, higher levels of which indicate the seriousness of the cancer progression. Following the deterministic modeling of the data by the previous authors, Cox et al., this paper is concerned with the theoretical knowledge that could be gained by the stochastic modeling in discrete form of the PSA path over time. The expected value of the PSA level is computed and compared with the deterministic model and it is found that they are the same for about the first year after radiation therapy. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology has set a consensus panel definition of biochemical failure following radiation therapy: the rise in three consecutive levels of PSA is considered to be a failure of the radiation therapy. Knowledge of the path of PSA presented in this paper would be useful in the management of the radiation treatment and in particular assessing quantitatively any clinically based policy for defining recurrence after radiation therapy. Application of the model is illustrated by fitting it to clinical data available in the University of Michigan cancer center.     

Discovery and Validation of a Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier that Predicts Early Metastasis Following Radical Prostatectomy

Purpose

Clinicopathologic features and biochemical recurrence are sensitive, but not specific, predictors of metastatic disease and lethal prostate cancer. We hypothesize that a genomic expression signature detected in the primary tumor represents true biological potential of aggressive disease and provides improved prediction of early prostate cancer metastasis.

Methods

A nested case-control design was used to select 639 patients from the Mayo Clinic tumor registry who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 2001. A genomic classifier (GC) was developed by modeling differential RNA expression using 1.4 million feature high-density expression arrays of men enriched for rising PSA after prostatectomy, including 213 who experienced early clinical metastasis after biochemical recurrence. A training set was used to develop a random forest classifier of 22 markers to predict for cases - men with early clinical metastasis after rising PSA. Performance of GC was compared to prognostic factors such as Gleason score and previous gene expression signatures in a withheld validation set.

Results

Expression profiles were generated from 545 unique patient samples, with median follow-up of 16.9 years. GC achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (0.67–0.83) in validation, outperforming clinical variables and gene signatures. GC was the only significant prognostic factor in multivariable analyses. Within Gleason score groups, cases with high GC scores experienced earlier death from prostate cancer and reduced overall survival. The markers in the classifier were found to be associated with a number of key biological processes in prostate cancer metastatic disease progression.

Conclusion

A genomic classifier was developed and validated in a large patient cohort enriched with prostate cancer metastasis patients and a rising PSA that went on to experience metastatic disease. This early metastasis prediction model based on genomic expression in the primary tumor may be useful for identification of aggressive prostate cancer.     

Treatment- and disease-related complications of prostate cancer

One of the highlights of the 16th International Prostate Cancer Update was a session on treatment- and disease-related complications of prostate disease. It began with presentation of a challenging case of rising prostate-specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy, followed by an overview of the use of zoledronic acid in prostate cancer, a review of side effects of complementary medicines, an overview of complications of cryotherapy, an assessment of complications of brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy, and a comparison of laparoscopy versus open prostatectomy.     

Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radical prostatectomy

The most common treatment options for men with clinically localized prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. The choice between these options is often controversial, and selecting the optimal treatment poses a great challenge for patients and physicians. Factors important to the decision include age and life expectancy of the patient, the natural history of the prostate cancer, how curable the disease is, and the morbidity of treatment. Use of these criteria to select treatment for a healthy, 70-year-old man presenting with a nonpalpable tumor, stage T1c disease, serum prostate-specific antigen of 12 ng/mL, and an adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 8 that is present in 2 of 12 biopsy cores would lead to the choice of radical prostatectomy over radiation therapy. Data show that such a patient has a life expectancy of more than 12.3 years if the prostate cancer can be cured and a high probability of dying from the disease if it is not cured. Data further show that radical prostatectomy in such a patient would confer a survival advantage over radiation therapy without resulting in greater complications or reduction in quality of life.     

A tissue biomarker panel predicting systemic progression after PSA recurrence post-definitive prostate cancer therapy

Background

Many men develop a rising PSA after initial therapy for prostate cancer. While some of these men will develop a local or metastatic recurrence that warrants further therapy, others will have no evidence of disease progression. We hypothesized that an expression biomarker panel can predict which men with a rising PSA would benefit from further therapy.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A case-control design was used to test the association of gene expression with outcome. Systemic (SYS) progression cases were men post-prostatectomy who developed systemic progression within 5 years after PSA recurrence. PSA progression controls were matched men post-prostatectomy with PSA recurrence but no evidence of clinical progression within 5 years. Using expression arrays optimized for paraffin-embedded tissue RNA, 1021 cancer-related genes were evaluated–including 570 genes implicated in prostate cancer progression. Genes from 8 previously reported marker panels were included. A systemic progression model containing 17 genes was developed. This model generated an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84–0.92). Similar AUCs were generated using 3 previously reported panels. In secondary analyses, the model predicted the endpoints of prostate cancer death (in SYS cases) and systemic progression beyond 5 years (in PSA controls) with hazard ratios 2.5 and 4.7, respectively (log-rank p-values of 0.0007 and 0.0005). Genes mapped to 8q24 were significantly enriched in the model.

Conclusions/Significance

Specific gene expression patterns are significantly associated with systemic progression after PSA recurrence. The measurement of gene expression pattern may be useful for determining which men may benefit from additional therapy after PSA recurrence.     

Expression signatures that correlated with Gleason score and relapse in prostate cancer

Predicting prognosis in prostate carcinoma remains a challenge when using clinical and pathologic criteria only. We used an array-based DASL assay to identify molecular signatures for predicting prostate cancer relapse in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) prostate cancers, through gene expression profiling of 512 prioritized genes. Of the 71 patients that we analyzed, all but 3 had no evidence of residual tumor (defined as negative surgical margins) following radical prostatectomy and no patient received adjuvant therapy following surgery. All of the 71 patients had an undetectable serum PSA following radical prostatectomy. Follow-up period was 44+/-15 months. Highly reproducible gene expression patterns were obtained with these samples (average R(2)=0.99). We identified a panel of 11 genes that correlated positively and 5 genes that correlated negatively with Gleason grade. A gene expression score (GEX) was derived from the expression levels of the 16 genes. We assessed the prognostic value of these genes and found the GEX significantly correlated with disease relapse (p=0.007). These results suggest that the approach we used is effective for expression profiling in heterogeneous FFPE tissues for cancer diagnosis/prognosis biomarker discovery and validation.     

Initial experience with single-agent docetaxel as neoadjuvant therapy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer

Patients with locally advanced prostate cancer have worse outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) than patients with more favorable parameters. The findings of large, contemporary, RP series have led investigators at a number of centers to evaluate the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced disease. A currently ongoing study of 28 patients explores the antitumor response of a regimen of single-agent, docetaxel, 40 mg/m(2), administered intravenously on a weekly schedule for 6 weeks to patients with locally advanced prostate cancer before RP. Docetaxel has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced, androgen-independent disease. Study results showed that 75% of patients had reductions in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ranging from 9%-79% at the completion of docetaxel therapy. In 25% of the patients, PSA levels increased by 2%-18% from baseline to completion of chemotherapy. In addition, noncastrate levels of testosterone were maintained in all patients. The docetaxel therapy has also been relatively well tolerated. Reporting of the primary endpoint of pathologic response is pending completion of accrual and surgery.     

Success and failure of single-modality treatment for early prostate cancer

Many men who undergo radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for early prostate cancer have an excellent outcome; however, a significant proportion subsequently experience disease recurrence and/or cancer-related death. Adjuvant hormonal therapy after treatment of curative intent is given with the aim of eradicating undetected cancer cells outside the surgical margins or radiation field and/or micrometastatic disease. In the analogous setting of early breast cancer, adjuvant hormonal therapy is already established as standard care. Efficacy and tolerability data from the ongoing bicalutamide ('Casodex') Early Prostate Cancer program are expected to determine the role of adjuvant hormonal therapy with antiandrogens in early prostate cancer.