Chronic epididymitis: a practical approach to understanding and managing a difficult urologic enigma

Many patients with unilateral or bilateral testicular, epididymal, or scrotal pain as their sole presenting symptom receive a diagnosis of "chronic epididymitis." This common clinical entity is diagnosed and treated by practicing urologists but essentially ignored by academic urologists. This article defines chronic epididymitis, reviews current knowledge regarding its etiology, and describes appropriate physical examination and clinical testing for patients with the condition. The recently developed Chronic Epididymitis Symptom Index is presented, which can be used for baseline evaluation and follow-up of patients with chronic epididymitis, both in clinical practice and in research treatment trials. Treatment options, from watchful waiting to medical therapy to epididymectomy, are reviewed.     

Smoking: Its Impact on Urologic Health

Tobacco use remains the single largest preventable cause of disease and premature death in the United States, and smoking is a leading cause of cancer and death from cancer. There is also evidence that smoking is associated with several urologic diseases. Urologists have a unique opportunity to help our patients lead healthy lifestyles, which includes ending their dependence on nicotine and tobacco. This article points out the various urologic conditions associated with smoking and tobacco use with the intention of providing physicians and patients with knowledge and education regarding this connection.Key words: Bladder cancer, Prostate cancer, Kidney cancer, Erectile dysfunction, Interstitial cystitisSmoking remains one of the greatest health threats to our nation, and the death rate among current smokers is two to three times that of nonsmokers.¹ There is also evidence that smoking is associated with several urologic diseases. If we are to be effective healthcare providers, urologists must make a concerted effort to make our patients aware of the connections between tobacco and common urologic diseases. Also, urologists are in the unique position to motivate patients to stop smoking and to enter smoking cessation programs. This article points out the various urologic conditions associated with smoking and tobacco use with the intention of providing physicians and patients with knowledge and education regarding this connection.     

Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer 101: Basics,Controversies, and Facts

Proton beam therapy for prostate cancer has become a source of controversy in the urologic community, and the rapid dissemination and marketing of this technology has led to many patients inquiring about this therapy. Yet the complexity of the technology, the cost, and the conflicting messages in the literature have left many urologists ill equipped to counsel their patients regarding this option. This article reviews the basic science of the proton beam, examines the reasons for both the hype and the controversy surrounding this therapy, and, most importantly, examines the literature so that every urologist is able to comfortably discuss this option with inquiring patients.Key words: Prostate cancer, Proton beam therapy, External beam radiation therapy, Intensity modulated radiation therapyProton beam therapy (PBT) has become a source of controversy in the urologic community. It is not uncommon to hear mixed messages regarding the issue, from zealous advocates to cost-conscious skeptics, leaving many urologists unsure what to tell their patients with prostate cancer. What is clear, however, is that the technology is disseminating across the nation, and as our patients turn to the internet to learn more about their diagnosis, they are going to encounter increasingly more information about PBT, both scientific and promotional in nature. Hence, it is necessary for every urologist to understand the basics of PBT to help guide our patients through treatment options. This article reviews and compares the basic science of conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with PBT, examines the reasons for both the hype and the controversy surrounding this therapy, and, most importantly, examines the literature so that all urologists are adequately equipped to counsel their patients on this subject.     

Ergonomic Status of Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery: Survey Results from 241 Urologic Surgeons in China

Background

The prolonged and frequent use of laparoscopic equipment raises ergonomic risks that may cause physical distress for surgeons. We aimed to assess the prevalence of urologic surgeons’ physical distress associated with ergonomic problems in the operating room (OR) and their awareness of the ergonomic guidelines in China.

Methods

A sample of 300 laparoscopic urologists in China was assessed using a questionnaire on demographic information, ergonomic issues in the OR, musculoskeletal symptoms, and awareness of the ergonomic guidelines for the OR.

Results

There were 241 survey respondents (86.7%) with valid questionnaires. Among the respondents, only 43.6% placed the operating table at pubic height during the actual operation. The majority of the respondents (63.5%) used only one monitor during the procedure. Only 29.9% placed the monitor below the eye level. More than half of the respondents (50.6%) preferred to use manual control instead of the foot pedal. Most of the respondents (95.0%) never used the body support. The respondents experienced discomfort in the following regions, in ascending order: leg (21.6%), hand (30.3%), wrist (32.8%), shoulder (33.6%), back (53.1%), and neck (58.1%). The respondents with over 250 total operations experienced less discomfort than those with less than 250 total operations. Most of the respondents (84.6%) were unaware of the ergonomic guidelines. However, almost all of the respondents (98.3%) regarded the ergonomic guidelines to be important in the OR.

Conclusions

Most of the laparoscopic urologists were not aware of the ergonomic guidelines for the OR; hence, they have been suffering from varying degrees of physical discomfort caused by ergonomic issues. There is an urgent need for education regarding ergonomic guidelines in the OR for laparoscopic urologists in China.     

The role of the urologist in treating patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Objectives: To ascertain what percentage of urologists' oncology practice is dedicated to the care of prostate cancer patients and to determine urologists' attitudes towards the treatment of patients with metastatic and hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). An additional objective is to determine urologists' interest in administering various types of chemotherapy in HRPC patients.Materials and Methods: The American Urological Association (AUA) directory of practicing urologists was obtained, and 3000 randomly selected members of the AUA, as well as the complete list of 168 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) members, were chosen for the mailing of a 16-item questionnaire. The urologists were asked about how many of their patients have prostate cancer, how many have metastatic disease, and how many have HRPC and are currently receiving intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. In addition, the urologists were queried regarding their level of interest in learning about chemotherapy options as well as learning how to administer chemotherapy.Results: A total of 654 survey questionnaires were completed and returned for tabulation, resulting in a 21% effective response rate. Sixty-four percent of the responding urologists' cancer patients had prostate cancer, 21% had metastatic disease, and 19% had HRPC; only 4% of the urologists currently administer IV chemotherapy themselves. When asked to describe their interest in learning how to deliver and be reimbursed for IV chemotherapy, 26% expressed an extremely low level of interest, 23% a low level of interest, 31% a high level of interest, and 17% an extremely high level of interest. The results of other questions are presented and correlated with the number of years the urologists have been in practice and other demographic data.Conclusions: The management of prostate cancer comprises a major portion of urologists' practices. Almost one half (48%) of the urologists in this survey were interested in administering and being reimbursed for IV chemotherapy. Several chemotherapy regimens have been shown to improve quality of life in patients with HRPC, yet only about 30% of these patients were referred for chemotherapy. If more urologists were able to deliver these drugs, then the number of patients referred for chemotherapy would likely increase, as would accrual to important clinical trials in HRPC. The results of this survey suggest that methods to implement the training and reimbursement of urologists in the use of chemotherapy regimens should be investigated.     

Management of vesicoureteral reflux

Four cases of vesicoureteral reflux are discussed by prominent pediatric urologists. The condition can range from minimal reflux into the distal ureter to massive reflux causing tortuosity of the ureter and hydronephrosis. Treatment options range from medical management to tapering of the ureter with reimplantation. The cross-trigonal technique is popular among pediatric urologists, and the Politano-Leadbetter technique is a very successful technique that has stood the test of time. The extravesical approach to ureteral reimplantation reduces morbidity, shortens hospital stays, reduces medical costs, and maintains the high success rates of the intravesical techniques. Subureteric injection of bulking agents to correct the reflux holds promise as an alternative to open surgery, but presents the challenge of identifying the ideal bulking agent.     

Perplexing problem of persistently painful prostatitis

Chronic prostatitis has been a perplexing problem for urologists for decades. This review explores the perils and pitfalls urologists encounter with epidemiology, etiology, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of this syndrome. The major question involves the problem of developing rational treatment plans for patients with a medical condition associated with genitourinary pain, variable voiding, and sexual dysfunction but no obvious and accepted etiology. Exciting, innovative, ongoing research does offer some solutions and management strategies that urologists can even now incorporate into their practice while waiting for the fundamental questions to be answered.     

Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy: Treatment Recommendations Differ between Urologists and Radiation Oncologists

Purpose

There is no consensus on optimal use of radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy. The purpose of this study was to describe opinions of urologists and radiation oncologists regarding adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy.

Methods

Urologists and genitourinary radiation oncologists were solicited to participate in an online survey. Respondent characteristics included demographics, training, practice setting, patient volume/experience, and access to radiotherapy. Participant practice patterns and attitudes towards use of adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy in standardized clinical scenarios were assessed.

Results

One hundred and forty-six staff physicians participated in the survey (104 urologists and 42 genitourinary radiation oncologists). Overall, high Gleason score (Gleason 7 vs. 6, RR 1.37 95% CI 1.19-1.56, p<0.0001 and Gleason 8-10 vs. 6, RR 1.56 95% CI 1.37-1.78, p<0.0001), positive surgical margin (RR 1.43 95% CI 1.26-1.62, p<0.0001), and extraprostatic tumour extension (RR 1.16 95% CI 1.05-1.28, p<0.002) conferred an increased probability of recommending adjuvant radiotherapy. Radiation oncologists were more likely to recommend adjuvant radiotherapy across all clinical scenarios (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.39, 1.60, p <0.001). Major differences were found for patients with Gleason 6 and isolated positive surgical margin (radiotherapy selected by 21% of urologists vs. 70% of radiation oncologists), and patients with extraprostatic extension and negative surgical margins (radiotherapy selected by 18% of urologist vs. 57% of radiation oncologists).

Conclusions

Urologists and radiation oncologists frequently disagree about recommendation for post-prostatectomy adjuvant radiotherapy. Since clinical equipoise exists between adjuvant versus early salvage post-operative radiotherapy, support of clinical trials comparing these approaches is strongly encouraged.     

Validity of the "bother score" in the evaluation and treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a condition that is common among older men. It causes a variety of clinically significant lower urinary tract signs and symptoms. BPH is rarely life-threatening; the decision to seek treatment is frequently based on the degree to which patients find the symptoms bothersome and disruptive of daily activities. Recently developed reliable and valid outcome measures to evaluate treatments for BPH are clinical tools that urologists can use to determine the extent of bother and make treatment decisions. A single question used to determine the "bother score" provides a widely used and statistically valid measure of the need for treatment of BPH. Validation data support the argument that the bother score is a statistically reliable measure of treatment outcome in patients with BPH who view their symptoms as bothersome.     

De-implementation of low value castration for men with prostate cancer: protocol for a theory-based,mixed methods approach to minimizing low value androgen deprivation therapy (DeADT)

Background

Men with prostate cancer are often castrated with long-acting injectable drugs termed androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Although many benefit, ADT is also used in patients with little or nothing to gain. The best ways to stop this practice are unknown, and range from blunt pharmacy restrictions to informed decision-making. This study will refine and pilot two different de-implementation strategies for reducing ADT use among those unlikely to benefit in preparation for a comparative effectiveness trial.

Methods/design

This innovative mixed methods research program has three aims. Aim 1: To assess preferences and barriers for de-implementation of chemical castration in prostate cancer. Guided by the theoretical domains framework (TDF), urologists and patients from facilities with the highest and lowest castration rates across the VA will be interviewed to identify key preferences and de-implementation barriers for reducing castration as prostate cancer treatment. This qualitative work will inform Aim 2 while gathering rich information for two proposed pilot intervention strategies. Aim 2: To use a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a novel barrier prioritization approach, for de-implementation strategy tailoring. The investigators will conduct national surveys of urologists to prioritize key barriers identified in Aim 1 for stopping incident castration as localized prostate cancer treatment using a DCE experiment design. These quantitative results will identify the most important barriers to be addressed through tailoring of two pilot de-implementation strategies in preparation for Aim 3 piloting. Aim 3: To pilot two tailored de-implementation strategies to reduce castration as localized prostate cancer treatment. Building on findings from Aims 1 and 2, two de-implementation strategies will be piloted. One strategy will focus on formulary restriction at the organizational level and the other on physician/patient informed decision-making at different facilities. Outcomes will include acceptability, feasibility, and scalability in preparation for an effectiveness trial comparing these two widely varying de-implementation strategies.

Discussion

Our innovative approach to de-implementation strategy development is directly aligned with state-of-the-art complex implementation intervention development and implementation science. This work will broadly advance de-implementation science for low value cancer care, and foster participation in our de-implementation evaluation trial by addressing barriers, facilitators, and concerns through pilot tailoring.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03579680, First Posted July 6, 2018.

     

To Share or Not to Share: Malaysian Healthcare Professionals' Views on Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Making Roles

Aim

To explore the views of Malaysian healthcare professionals (HCPs) on stakeholders’ decision making roles in localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatment.

Methods

Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted with HCPs treating PCa. Data was analysed using a thematic approach. Four in-depth interviews and three focus group discussions were conducted between December 2012 and March 2013 using a topic guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.

Findings

The participants comprised private urologists (n = 4), government urologists (n = 6), urology trainees (n = 6), government policy maker (n = 1) and oncologists (n = 3). HCP perceptions of the roles of the three parties involved (HCPs, patients, family) included: HCP as the main decision maker, HCP as a guide to patients’ decision making, HCP as a facilitator to family involvement, patients as main decision maker and patient prefers HCP to decide. HCPs preferred to share the decision with patients due to equipoise between prostate treatment options. Family culture was important as family members often decided on the patient’s treatment due to Malaysia’s close-knit family culture.

Conclusions

A range of decision making roles were reported by HCPs. It is thus important that stakeholder roles are clarified during PCa treatment decisions. HCPs need to cultivate an awareness of sociocultural norms and family dynamics when supporting non-Western patients in making decisions about PCa.     

Epididymal metastasis from carcinoma of the prostate

Epididymal Metastasis from a primary carcinoma of the prostate gland is a rare but recognised phenomena. We describe a case of such metastasis which, unlike previous reports, presents as a painful epididymal mass. Therefore it is important for urologists to consider epididymal metastasis as part of the differential diagnosis in a patient with known carcinoma of the prostate and a tender epididymal mass.     

Medical and minimally invasive treatment of urinary incontinence

Newer agents and procedures give urologists more options in treating patients who have urinary incontinence related to such etiologies as an ineffective sphincter, detrusor hypersensitivity, obstruction, or a combination of these. Abolition of the involuntary contractions characteristic of detrusor instability can be accomplished pharmacologically or surgically. First-line anticholinergic agents are tolterodine and oxybutynin XL, given orally. Alternatively, intravesical administration provides a high concentration of drug, such as capsaicin or resiniferatoxin, at the detrusor muscle level. However, this commits the patient to intermittent self-catheterization. Surgery is reserved for those who have failed prolonged trials of conservative therapies. For patients with intractable urge incontinence, urologists have the new technique of sacral nerve stimulation.     

Lower urinary tract injuries following blunt trauma: a review of contemporary management

Lower urinary tract trauma, although relatively uncommon in blunt trauma, can lead to significant morbidity when diagnosed late or left untreated; urologists may only encounter a handful of these injuries in their career. This article reviews the literature and reports on the management of these injuries, highlighting the issues facing clinicians in this subspecialty. Also presented is a structured review detailing the mechanisms, classification, diagnosis, management, and complications of blunt trauma to the bladder and urethra. The prognosis for bladder rupture is excellent when treated. Significant intraperitoneal rupture or involvement of the bladder neck mandates surgical repair, whereas smaller extraperitoneal lacerations may be managed with catheterization alone. With the push for management of trauma patients in larger centers, urologists in these hospitals are seeing increasing numbers of lower urinary tract injuries. Prospective analysis may be achieved in these centers to address the current lack of Level 1 evidence.     

Another look at cryoprostatectomy

The early 1960s witnessed a marked advancement in cryogenic research and its clinical application to surgery. Cooper's development of a closed controllable method for destruction of tissue by cryosurgery was at the forefront. In 1964, Gonder et al. (3) modified this apparatus and popularized its use in the treatment of the common problem of the obstructing prostate gland. However, this potential panacea soon presented the urologists with unexpected serious complicaions. Prolonged sloughing of the necrotized prostate, accidental freezing of rectum, bladder, external urethral sphincter occurred which were unacceptable and rarely encountered with conventional methods of prostatectomy. At this point in time, most urologists in the United States abandoned this procedure. However, others persisted and modified this technique with more precise methods of control monitoring and utilized a small resection of thawing prostate at the time of cryoprostatectomy. During this transition phase, the indications were justifiably narrowed to (i) poor-risk patients, (ii) those with hematological problems, (iii) treatment of large inoperable prostate carcinomas. Our experience with the last 100 cases of combined cryotransurethral prostatectomy encourages another look at this procedure. The utilization of this method, however, must be restricted to a select group of patients and should be carried out by only those urologists properly trained in this surgical modality.     

Hypercalcemic States associated with nephrolithiasis

Although kidney stone formation due to hypercalcemic states is rare, it is important for urologists to understand the pathophysiology of these conditions, methods of diagnosis, and treatments. This should foster a quicker diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy. The latter typically leads to the attenuation of kidney stone activity. Moreover, these patients have a systemic disease, and therapy has other health benefits.     

Medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: new terminology, new concepts, better choices

This article discusses 3 areas of medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that are undergoing extensive research and evaluation: 1) the use of muscarinic receptor antagonists to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with BPH; 2) the definition of an "enlarged prostate"; and 3) sexual function and LUTS. Fears of worsening obstructive symptoms or causing acute urinary retention often keep practitioners from prescribing muscarinic receptor antagonists to men who might have concomitant bladder outlet obstruction; a multicenter, multinational, double-blind study showed that tolterodine is safe for men with low postvoid residual volumes. Most urologists accept that a prostate volume of more than 40 mL is consistent with an enlarged prostate; there is more debate regarding prostate volumes of 30 to 40 mL. Recently presented data suggest that combination medical therapy might be effective for men having prostates with volumes of more than 25 mL. The association between voiding and sexual function has been increasingly recognized and investigated, and there seem to be common pathophysiologic mechanisms governing both conditions. Targeted treatment algorithms addressing both conditions seem warranted.     

Adenoviral gene therapy, radiation, and prostate cancer

Viral gene therapy has exceptional potential as a specifically tailored cancer treatment. However, enthusiasm for cancer gene therapy has varied over the years, partly owing to safety concerns after the death of a young volunteer in a clinical trial for a genetic disease. Since this singular tragedy, results from numerous clinical trials over the past 10 years have restored the excellent safety profile of adenoviral vectors. These vectors have been extensively studied in phase I and II trials as intraprostatically administered agents for patients with locally recurrent and high-risk local prostate cancer. Promising therapeutic responses have been reported in several studies with both oncolytic and suicide gene therapy strategies. The additional benefit of combining gene therapy with radiation therapy has also been realized; replicating adenoviruses inhibit DNA repair pathways, resulting in a synergistic sensitization to radiation. Other, nonreplicating suicide gene therapy strategies are also significantly enhanced with radiation. Combined radiation/gene therapy is currently being studied in phase I and II clinical trials and will likely be the first adenoviral gene therapy mechanism to become available to urologists in the clinic. Systemic gene therapy for metastatic disease is also a major goal of the field, and clinical trials are currently under way for hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Second- and third-generation "re-targeted" viral vectors, currently being developed in the laboratory, are likely to further improve these systemic trials.     

mHealth in Urology: A Review of Experts’ Involvement in App Development

IntroductionSmartphones are increasingly playing a role in healthcare and previous studies assessing medical applications (apps) have raised concerns about lack of expert involvement and low content accuracy. However, there are no such studies in Urology. We reviewed Urology apps with the aim of assessing the level of participation of healthcare professionals (HCP) and scientific Urology associations in their development.ResultsThe search yielded 372 apps, of which 150 were specific for Urology. A fifth of all apps had no HCP involvement (20.7%) and only a third had been developed with a scientific Urology association (34.7%). The lowest percentage of HCP (13.4%) and urological association (1.9%) involvement was in apps designed for the general population. Furthermore, there was no contribution from an Urology society in "Electronic Medical Record" nor in "Patient Information" apps. A limitation of the study is that only Android and iOS apps were reviewed.ConclusionsDespite the increasing Mobile Health (mHealth) market, this is the first study that demonstrates the lack of expert participation in the design of Urology apps, particularly in apps designed for the general public. Until clear regulation is enforced, the urological community should help regulate app development. Maintaining a register of certified apps or issuing an official scientific seal of approval could improve overall app quality. We propose that urologists become stakeholders in mHealth, shaping future app design and promoting peer-review app validation.     

Fine needle aspiration of the prostate gland in the community hospital. A predictive value analysis

Fine needle aspiration cytology of the prostate gland has not been widely accepted into the clinical armamentarium of most urologists, even though its benefits are well recognized. This sluggish acceptance is most likely due to a cautious reluctance on the part of the general pathologist in the community hospital to evaluate these specimens and to uncertainty on the part of the urologist on how to interpret the pathologist's impressions should the pathologist attempt to evaluate the specimens. This article offers a predictive value analysis of the data obtained from four general pathologists after reviewing 50 fine needle aspirations of the prostate.