内质网和细胞骨架在植物病毒细胞内转运中的作用

植物病毒的侵染循环是一个病毒.寄主互作过程.内质网和细胞骨架在病毒细胞内转运中起着重要调节作用,不仅协助病毒从复制位点转运到细胞边缘胞间连丝处,还可能介导多余病毒因子的降解.针对植物细胞内质网和细胞骨架在烟草花叶病毒等植物病毒细胞内转运过程中所起的作用进行了综述.     

植物病毒长距离转运的分子机理

植物病毒侵入寄主细胞后,其局部侵染和系统侵染的形成涉及病毒在植物体内二种不同的转运模式:经过叶肉细胞胞间连丝来实现的胞间转运(cel-to-cell movement)和经过植物维管系统的韧皮部筛管来实现的长距离转运(long-distance transport)[1].近十年来对胞间转运的大量研究,尤其是对TMV在烟草叶肉细胞间转运机理的出色研究,使人们逐步明晰了病毒胞间转运的一些基本步骤及转运机理,建立起了植物病毒胞间转运机理研究的基本模式[2-5].与此同时,因病毒的长距离转运是其实现系统侵染的关键过程,人们对病毒长距离转运机理的研究也积累了相当多的工作,该方面的研究日益成为植物病毒学研究的一个重要内容.本文拟对病毒长距离转运过程中所涉及的病毒因子、病毒-寄主的互作及病毒进出韧皮部筛分子的可能方式作一概述.     

植物病毒蛋白核质转运的研究进展

植物病毒编码一些含有核定位信号(nuclear localization signal,NLS)或者核输出信号(nuclear export signal,NES)的核质转运蛋白,这些已被验证的转运蛋白有三种类型:核输入蛋白、核输出蛋白和核质穿梭蛋白。它们通过识别寄主核质转运受体Importinα和Importinβ,介导含有经典核定位信号的蛋白质入核过程,以及寄主蛋白Ran参与,由XPO1介导的富含亮氨酸核输出信号的蛋白质出核过程。植物病毒核质转运蛋白利用寄主的转运机制,进出细胞核发挥相应功能,如介导病毒基因组的核输入和核输出、介导病毒长距离运输及系统侵染、抵抗寄主细胞启动的RNA沉默、调节寄主细胞转录活性、调控病毒的复制及表达和参与病毒症状的形成等。对植物病毒蛋白核质转运的相关研究进展进行综述,着重介绍植物病毒蛋白核质转运类型、核输入和输出信号、转运机制和生物学意义,以及寄主蛋白介导的互作等研究的最新成果。     

植物病毒的运动蛋白（Movement Protein）

植物病毒的运动蛋白是由病毒编码的一种蛋白,在病毒的细胞间运动中起重要作用。现在,发现的运动蛋白越来越多,对其一级结构、在植物体内的表达、定位和功能日益清楚。但运动蛋白在体内的修饰及其与运动蛋白功能的关系的研究还刚开始,对与运动蛋白作用的寄主因子了解很少。植物运动蛋白的研究对植物病毒细胞间运动和植物体内特有的胞间连丝的研究提供了很好的突破口。     

玉米根冠中类外连丝的结构特征及其共质传输功能(简报)

胞间连丝是植物体内连接两个相邻细胞原生质体的共质运输通道,在胞间物质的转运和通讯联络上发挥重要作用。胞间连丝的功能在生理上主要体现在它对胞间转运物质的通透性（permeability）,通透性的变化和调节影响到许多生理过程的进展与协调。在植物的不同组织及其发育的不同阶段,不同的物化因素,不同的逆境胁迫以及病原物的侵染均可导致胞间连丝的通透性呈现相应的变动。胞间连丝存在形式的多样性以及对其不同程度和不同方式的修饰,均可对胞间连丝的生理功能及其通透性有明显的影响。[第一段]     

胞间连丝与大分子物质的胞间转运机制

胞间连丝是相邻细胞间共质体运输的桥梁。基于对胞间连丝分子组成及超微结构的研究,不同学者提出了不同的胞间连丝结构模型。对其功能的研究表明,胞间连丝在物质运输、信息传递、病毒的周身感染等方面都具有重要作用。文章就胞间连丝的结构、分子组成及病毒介导的大分子胞间转移,以及对内源蛋白质的胞间转运机制诸方面的研究进展作了概述。     

胞间连丝与大分子物质的胞间转移

胞间连丝是细胞间细胞器,是细胞间通讯的直接途径。一般认为,胞间连丝允许通过物质的分子量上限(SEL)是800～1000 Da．近年来研究的许多证据表明,胞间连丝的SEL随组织种类及其生理状况而异。在某些情况下,它可以允许大分子物质通过,如病毒运动蛋白与胞间连丝相互作用,使病毒通过胞间连丝转移。玉米突变体 kn1基因异常表达的KN1可使包括表皮在内的各层组织结瘤,KN1是细胞间移动的信息物,P-蛋白可由伴胞通过胞间连丝转移到筛管。某些组织中胞间连丝很高的SEL和发育过程胞间连丝SEL的变化可能在植物发育调控中有重要作用。本文对大分子通过胞间连丝转移的机理进行了讨论。     

抗病毒转基因植物

欧共体委员会(CEC)桥(Bridge)计划最近资助了一项题为植物病毒胞间移动与胞间连丝结构间关系的细胞生物学的项目。对在侵染周期中可使植物病毒进入健康细胞的病毒蛋白(细胞间移动蛋白)的研究对所涉及的病毒机制和正在探讨的植物结构都有所启发。在病毒侵染周期中细胞间移动蛋白由病毒基     

刺盘孢菌的蛋白互作预测及侵染早期共表达模块分析

刺盘孢菌是一类重要的植物病原真菌,在全球范围内危害众多单双子叶植物。有许多研究对病菌的侵染模式进行了探索,但仍未阐明其确切的分子机制。本研究在预测病菌蛋白互作的基础上,结合表达谱数据对病菌在活体生存环境下的共表达模块进行挖掘和分析,以期为分子机制的研究提供新的线索。通过同源映射法和结构域法,预测得到刺盘孢菌的4 288个蛋白之间存在41 700个潜在互作,其中39 776个互作发生于异源蛋白之间,1 924个互作发生于同一蛋白内。将蛋白互作数据分别与4个表达谱数据进行整合,构建得到离体I、离体II、活体I和活体II 4个共表达互作组。对离体和活体互作组的共有基因的表达水平进行比较分析,结果表明,与离体互作组相比,活体互作组中与翻译、蛋白代谢等有关的基因表达水平下降,与离子转运、糖物质转运等有关的基因表达水平上升,暗示了物质转运在刺盘孢菌侵染早期的重要作用。进一步对活体互作组进行模块化分析,结果表明,活体I和活体II的特异模块分别与胁迫响应、肌动蛋白纤维长度调控有关,其中胁迫响应子网是以热激蛋白Hsp70为核心的互作簇,可能参与病菌对寄主的识别与对抗;肌动蛋白纤维长度调控子网则可能与病菌菌丝在寄主细胞间的延伸有关。     

胞间连丝与大分子物质的胞间转移

胞间连丝是细胞间细胞器,是细胞间通讯的直接途径。一般认为,胞间连丝允许通过物质的分子量上限（ＳＥＬ）是８００～１０００Ｄａ．近年来研究的许多证据表明,胞间连丝的ＳＥＬ随组织种类及其生理状况而异。在某些情况下,它可以允许大分子物质通过,如病毒运动蛋白与胞间连丝相互作用,使病毒通过胞间连丝转移。玉米突变体ｋｎ１基因异常表达的ＫＮ１可使包括表皮在内的各层组织结瘤,ＫＮ１是细胞间移动的信息物,Ｐ蛋白可由伴胞通过胞间连丝转移到筛管。某些组织中胞间连丝很高的ＳＥＬ和发育过程胞间连丝ＳＥＬ的变化可能在植物发育调控中有重要作用。本文对大分子通过胞间连丝转移的机理进行了讨论。     

Replication and trafficking of a plant virus are coupled at the entrances of plasmodesmata

Plant viruses use movement proteins (MPs) to modify intercellular pores called plasmodesmata (PD) to cross the plant cell wall. Many viruses encode a conserved set of three MPs, known as the triple gene block (TGB), typified by Potato virus X (PVX). In this paper, using live-cell imaging of viral RNA (vRNA) and virus-encoded proteins, we show that the TGB proteins have distinct functions during movement. TGB2 and TGB3 established endoplasmic reticulum–derived membranous caps at PD orifices. These caps harbored the PVX replicase and nonencapsidated vRNA and represented PD-anchored viral replication sites. TGB1 mediated insertion of the viral coat protein into PD, probably by its interaction with the 5′ end of nascent virions, and was recruited to PD by the TGB2/3 complex. We propose a new model of plant virus movement, which we term coreplicational insertion, in which MPs function to compartmentalize replication complexes at PD for localized RNA synthesis and directional trafficking of the virus between cells.     

How do plant virus nucleic acids move through intercellular connections?

In addition to their function in transport of water, ions, small metabolites, and growth factors in normal plant tissue, the plasmodesmata presumably serve as routes for cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses in infected tissue. Virus cell-to-cell spread through plasmodesmata is an active process mediated by specialized virus encoded movement proteins; however, the mechanism by which these proteins operate is not clear. We incorporate recent information on the biochemical properties of plant virus movement proteins and their interaction with plasmodesmata in a model for transport of nucleic acids through plasmodesmatal channels. We propose that only single stranded (ss) nucleic acids can be transported efficiently through plasmodesmata, and that movement proteins function as molecular chaperones for ss nucleic acids to form unfolded movement protein-ss nucleic acid complexes. These complexes are targeted to plasmodesmata. Plasmodesmatal permeability is then increased following interaction with movement protein and the entire movement complex or its nucleic acid component is translocated across the plasmodesmatal channel.     

Tubule-guided cell-to-cell movement of a plant virus requires class XI myosin motors

Cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses occurs via plasmodesmata (PD), organelles that evolved to facilitate intercellular communications. Viral movement proteins (MP) modify PD to allow passage of the virus particles or nucleoproteins. This passage occurs via several distinct mechanisms one of which is MP-dependent formation of the tubules that traverse PD and provide a conduit for virion translocation. The MP of tubule-forming viruses including Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) recruit the plant PD receptors called Plasmodesmata Located Proteins (PDLP) to mediate tubule assembly and virus movement. Here we show that PDLP1 is transported to PD through a specific route within the secretory pathway in a myosin-dependent manner. This transport relies primarily on the class XI myosins XI-K and XI-2. Inactivation of these myosins using dominant negative inhibition results in mislocalization of PDLP and MP and suppression of GFLV movement. We also found that the proper targeting of specific markers of the Golgi apparatus, the plasma membrane, PD, lipid raft subdomains within the plasma membrane, and the tonoplast was not affected by myosin XI-K inhibition. However, the normal tonoplast dynamics required myosin XI-K activity. These results reveal a new pathway of the myosin-dependent protein trafficking to PD that is hijacked by GFLV to promote tubule-guided transport of this virus between plant cells.     

Cellular pathways for viral transport through plasmodesmata

Plant viruses use plasmodesmata (PD) to spread infection between cells and systemically. Dependent on viral species, movement through PD can occur in virion or non-virion form, and requires different mechanisms for targeting and modification of the pore. These mechanisms are supported by viral movement proteins and by other virus-encoded factors that interact among themselves and with plant cellular components to facilitate virus movement in a coordinated and regulated fashion.     

The Ins and Outs of Nondestructive Cell-to-Cell and Systemic Movement of Plant Viruses

Propagation of viral infection in host plants comprises two distinct and sequential stages: viral transport from the initially infected cell into adjacent neighboring cells, a process termed local or cell-to-cell movement, and a chain of events collectively referred to as systemic movement that consists of entry into the vascular tissue, systemic distribution with the phloem stream, and unloading of the virus into noninfected tissues. To achieve intercellular transport, viruses exploit plasmodesmata, complex cytoplasmic bridges interconnecting plant cells. Viral transport through plasmodesmata is aided by virus-encoded proteins, the movement proteins (MPs), which function by two distinct mechanisms: MPs either bind viral nucleic acids and mediate passage of the resulting movement complexes (M-complexes) between cells, or MPs become a part of pathogenic tubules that penetrate through host cell walls and serve as conduits for transport of viral particles. In the first mechanism, M-complexes pass into neighboring cells without destroying or irreversibly altering plasmodesmata, whereas in the second mechanism plasmodesmata are replaced or significantly modified by the tubules. Here we summarize the current knowledge on both local and systemic movement of viruses that progress from cell to cell as M-complexes in a nondestructive fashion. For local movement, we focus mainly on movement functions of the 30 K superfamily viruses, which encode MPs with structural homology to the 30 kDa MP of Tobacco mosaic virus, one of the most extensively studied plant viruses, whereas systemic movement is primarily described for two well-characterized model systems, Tobacco mosaic virus and Tobacco etch potyvirus. Because local and systemic movement are intimately linked to the molecular infrastructure of the host cell, special emphasis is placed on host factors and cellular structures involved in viral transport.     

A novel function for a ubiquitous plant enzyme pectin methylesterase: the host-cell receptor for the tobacco mosaic virus movement protein

Plant virus-encoded movement proteins promote viral spread between plant cells via plasmodesmata. The movement is assumed to require a plasmodesmata targeting signal to interact with still unidentified host factors presumably located on plasmodesmata and cell walls. The present work indicates that a ubiquitous cell wall-associated plant enzyme pectin methylesterase of Nicotiana tabacum L. specifically binds to the movement protein encoded by tobacco mosaic virus. We also show that pectin methylesterase is an RNA binding protein. These data suggest that pectin methylesterase is a host cell receptor involved in cell-to-cell movement of tobacco mosaic virus.     

Plant virus transport: motions of functional equivalence

Plant virus cell-to-cell movement and subsequent systemic transport are governed by a series of mechanisms involving various virus and plant factors. Specialized virus encoded movement proteins (MPs) control the cell-to-cell transport of viral nucleoprotein complexes through plasmodesmata. MPs of different viruses have diverse properties and each interacts with specific host factors that also have a range of functions. Most viruses are then transported via the phloem as either nucleoprotein complexes or virions, with contributions from host and virus proteins. Some virus proteins contribute to the establishment and maintenance of systemic infection by inhibiting RNA silencing-mediated degradation of viral RNA. In spite of all the different movement strategies and the viral and host components, there are possible functional commonalities in virus-host interactions that govern viral spread through plants.     

Plasmodesmata and plant viruses. A centenary story.

The passage of plant viruses from a cell to adjacent ones remained for a long time an unexplained event. Only during the thirties did Samuel and other plant virologists put forward the hypothesis that the passage occurred through plasmodesmata, i.e. those protoplasmic connections between plant cells described since the late 19th century. A direct relation between viruses and plasmodesmata was first demonstrated by electron microscopy during the late 1960s by Esau and co-workers, and then widely confirmed. The mechanism of the passage was investigated in depth starting from the 1970s, and research received a remarkable impulse after that a well-defined model of plasmodesmata had been obtained thank, in particular, to work of the Robards' and Gunning's groups. In this context, the discovery of the polycystronic functionality of the viral genomes was fundamental. A protein coded by tobacco mosaic virus, discovered in 1982 independently by the Soviet group of Atabekov and the American group of Zaitlin, was demonstrated to be indispensable for the transport of virus infection from cell to cell through plasmodesmata. Elegant investigations on this 'movement protein' demonstrated that it actually increases the permeability of plasmodesmata. The relation between viruses and plasmodesmata is one of the most interesting and investigated theme of research, which is receiving much attention from plant virologists, physiologists and molecular biologists. The current status of knowledge still presents unsolved questions, and the story is far from over.