Disinfection in Food Processing – Efficacy Testing of Disinfectants

The key to effective cleaning and disinfection of food plants is the understanding of the type of the soil to be removed from the surfaces. An efficient cleaning and disinfection procedure consists of a sequence of rinses using good quality water with application of detergents and disinfectants. Disinfection is required in food plant operations, where wet surfaces provide favourable conditions for the growth of microbes. The efficacy of disinfectants is usually determined in suspensions, which do not mimic the growth conditions on surfaces where the agents are required to inactivate the microbes. Therefore, the suspension tests do not give adequate information and reliable carrier tests, which mimic surface growth, are needed. In developing a proposal for the testing of disinfectants on surfaces to an analytical standard, it is important to identify the major sources of variation in the procedure. In response to the need for a relatively realistic, simple and reliable test for disinfectant efficacy a method for culturing laboratory model biofilms has developed. The use of artificial biofilms i.e. biofilm-constructs inoculated with process contaminants in disinfectant testing can also be used for screening the activity of various disinfectants on biofilm cells. Both biofilm carrier tests showed clearly that the biofilm protects the microbes against the disinfectants. The chemical cleanliness is also essential in food plants. The total cleanliness of the process lines is mainly based on measuring the microbial load using culturing techniques. These results can give an incorrect picture of the total cleanliness, because the viable microbes do not grow when disinfectants are left on the surface. The luminescent bacteria light inhibition method offers a useful alternative for testing chemical residue left on surfaces after cleaning and disinfection operations.     

Surface-Dried Viruses Can Resist Glucoprotamin-Based Disinfection

Touching of contaminated objects and surfaces is a well-known method of virus transmission. Once they are attached to the hands, viruses can easily get adsorbed and initiate infection. Hence, disinfection of frequently touched surfaces is of major importance to prevent virus spreading. Here we studied the antiviral activity of a glucoprotamin-containing disinfectant against influenza A virus and the model virus vaccinia virus (VACV) dried on inanimate surfaces. The efficacy of the surface disinfectant on stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride, and glass coupons was investigated in a quantitative carrier test. Vacuum-dried viruses were exposed to 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1% disinfectant for 5 min, 15 min, and 30 min without agitation, and residual infectivity was determined by endpoint titration. Although glucoprotamin was highly active against both viruses in suspension, limited antiviral activity against the surface-dried viruses was detected. Even after 30 min of exposure to 1% disinfectant, VACV was not completely inactivated. Furthermore, influenza A virus inactivation was strongly affected by the surface composition during the 5-min and 15-min treatments with 0.25% and 0.5% disinfectant. The results presented in this study highlight the relevance of practical tests to assess the antiviral activity of surface disinfectants. High virucidal activity in solution is not necessarily indicative of high antiviral activity against surface-dried viruses. In addition, we want to emphasize that the mere exposure of surfaces to disinfectants might not be sufficient for virus inactivation and mechanical action should be applied to bring attached viruses into contact with virucidal compounds.     

Efficacy of a variety of disinfectants against Listeria spp.

The efficacy of 14 disinfectants against Listeria innocua and two strains of Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of organic matter was studied. Quantitative efficacy tests were used. Many of the disinfectants tested were not as effective on Listeria spp. when the test organisms were dried onto the surface of steel disks (carrier tests) as they were when the organisms were placed in suspension (suspension test). The presence of whole serum and milk (2% fat) further reduced the disinfectant capacities of most of the formulations studied. Only three disinfectants (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, and glutaraldehyde) were effective in the carrier test in the presence of serum; however, all three were ineffective when challenged with milk (2% fat). Only one solution, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, was effective in the presence of milk. All but four formulations (chloramine-T, phosphoric acid, an iodophor, and formaldehyde) were effective in the suspension tests, regardless of the organic load. L. monocytogenes was observed to be slightly more resistant to disinfection than L. innocua was. There was no difference in disinfectant susceptibility between the two strains of L. monocytogenes. These findings emphasize the need for caution in selecting an appropriate disinfectant for use on contaminated surfaces, particularly in the presence of organic material.     

Sporicidal effect of disinfectants on Bacillus cereus isolated from the milk processing environment

The sporicidal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and a combination of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide on Bacillus cereus spores isolated from the milk processing environment was examined using the European Suspension Test and by a surface disinfection test on stainless steel and rubber. The results of the laboratory tests were compared with field trials in a milking installation. In general, it was difficult to obtain consistent results, as the repeatability and reproducibility of the tests were found to vary according to the test strain, spore suspension preparation, disinfectant test solution, organic load, contact time and temperature. The sporulation medium used to obtain spores influenced the sporicidal effect considerably. To overcome this problem a standard method for preparation of spore suspensions should be prescribed. The various disinfectants were more effective in suspensions than on surfaces and in field trials. For the suspension tests SE values ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 were reached within 10 min at 50°C, depending on the disinfectant used. Sodium hypochlorite-based products were most effective. The activity on spores on surfaces and in field trials was limited. In surface tests reductions of 0.4–0.8 were observed within 10 min at 50°C depending on the type of surface. The SE values obtained for rubber were lower compared with stainless steel. The decrease in spore levels found in the milking installation was comparable with the surface experiments, i.e. 0.4–1.0. It is important to develop standard test procedures to assess the sporicidal efficacy of disinfectants used in food hygiene. Surface tests should be included to reflect the in-use conditions more closely and minimum standards should be determined for both suspension tests and surface tests.     

Efficacy of a variety of disinfectants against Listeria spp

The efficacy of 14 disinfectants against Listeria innocua and two strains of Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of organic matter was studied. Quantitative efficacy tests were used. Many of the disinfectants tested were not as effective on Listeria spp. when the test organisms were dried onto the surface of steel disks (carrier tests) as they were when the organisms were placed in suspension (suspension test). The presence of whole serum and milk (2% fat) further reduced the disinfectant capacities of most of the formulations studied. Only three disinfectants (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, and glutaraldehyde) were effective in the carrier test in the presence of serum; however, all three were ineffective when challenged with milk (2% fat). Only one solution, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, was effective in the presence of milk. All but four formulations (chloramine-T, phosphoric acid, an iodophor, and formaldehyde) were effective in the suspension tests, regardless of the organic load. L. monocytogenes was observed to be slightly more resistant to disinfection than L. innocua was. There was no difference in disinfectant susceptibility between the two strains of L. monocytogenes. These findings emphasize the need for caution in selecting an appropriate disinfectant for use on contaminated surfaces, particularly in the presence of organic material.     

Progress report on CEN/TC 216/Working Group 3: Disinfectant test methods for food hygiene, institutional, industrial and domestic applications

The scope of Working Group 3 (WG3) is very wide both in terms of the areas it covers and the range of disinfectant applications. The major role of disinfectants within this field, however, is the control of the microbial contamination of surfaces that could be used to produce products to be eaten or used by people (cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs etc.). For these applications, disinfectants need to be tested to quantify the effects of microbial type and growth conditions, interfering substances, pH, temperature, contact time and concentration. To address these needs, WG3 has produced a Phase 2 Step 1 Bactericidal (prEN 1276) and Fungicidal (prEN 1650) test, which are at the stage of public comment, and are intended to cover the majority of disinfection applications in its remit. More specialist tests are in preparation to cover virucidal and sporicidal applications and will be available by 1997. These are suspension tests and should be applied when the targeted microbial contamination is already in suspension or is brought into suspension by the disinfectant action. In addition, a surface test is being developed on the basis of the protocol published by the Ad-hoc Surface Test Group. This test will be used to assess disinfection efficacy against organisms attached to surfaces, e.g. those remaining on food processing surfaces after a cleaning action. It is hoped that these approaches will provide test methods that will give confidence, to both disinfectant manufacturers and users, of the performance of disinfectant products when used for their intended purpose.     

A rapid method for assessing the suitability of quenching agents for individual biocides as well as combinations

AIMS: To develop a novel, rapid method for testing the ability of quenching agents to neutralize disinfectants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tests were performed to determine the suitability of different neutralizers for a range of disinfectants, using a new method based on the Bioscreen optical density analyser. Results showed that during disinfection tests, efficacy could be over-estimated due to poor, or no, neutralization of the disinfectant after a specified time of exposure to the bacteria. The failure to distinguish adequately between bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects can lead to false results during disinfectant testing. Experiments also showed that dilution of the disinfectant, following exposure to the bacteria, was not always sufficient to stop the activity of the disinfectant for chemicals with low dilution coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The quench test proved to be very quick and easy to perform, with results being available within 18 h. Using the Bioscreen, the test is automated and determines whether dilution into a particular neutralizer is able to inactivate a disinfectant within 30 s. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This new approach allows the efficacy of quenching agents to be determined, prior to undertaking each disinfection study, and can help in the development of more suitable quenching solutions. The test has also been used to find suitable neutralizers for mixtures of disinfectants which might be used during studies on synergistic biocide combinations.     

Assessment of the efficacy of disinfectants on surfaces

The Literature on testing the efficacy of disinfectants covers a century. Most predominant and standardized are the so called suspension tests that allow for the quantitative estimation of the microbicidal activity (log reduction factors) of disinfectants on test organisms suspended in solutions of these products.Since the outcome of suspension tests might be a poor predictor for the efficacy of a disinfectant under practical circumstances, especially with regard to bacteria attached to surfaces, a variety of test procedures have been designed to mimic those conditions. Within the framework of CEN/TC 216 a quantitative surface test has been developed to assess the activity of disinfectants on bacteria or fungi attached to steenless steel surfaces. Preliminary data suggest that covering a dried inoculum with disinfectant without any further mechanical action to improve contact between organisms and disinfectant, will usually result in lower reduction factors than those obtained with suspension tests. Comparative testing further suggests that by applying mechanical action, with the effect of resuspending cells in the liquid on the surface,—similar to mopping, brushing etc.— will result in higher reduction rates. Although not unexpected these findings emphasize the importance of designing test methods based on practical applications of disinfectants.     

On the methods of disinfecting bronchofibroscopes

An apparatus is proposed for the wet disinfection of bronchofibroscopes which enables to wash with disinfectant solution the external surfaces of the tube and instrument channel while keeping dry the control mechanism. Several disinfecting regimens have been tested using chlorohexidine (Gibitan), benzalkonium chloride (Roccal), diocide and ethanol solutions. On experimental contamination of bronchofibroscopes with a P. aeruginosa culture effective disinfection was achieved using 0.5% aqueous and ethanol solution of chlorohexidine and 1% benzalkonium chloride solution (5-min, exposure in the circulation mode of the apparatus), 0.1% solution of diocide only produced a bactericidal effect after a 30-min, exposure. Adequate disinfection was not feasible when the endoscope was soaked in disinfectant. Similar results were obtained when bronchofibroscopes were disinfected in a clinical setup where they became contaminated with the most common pathogenic and potentially pathogenic microflora from the airways of patients suffering from purulent pulmonary diseases.     

Disinfection and hygiene in the veterinary field and disinfection of animal houses and transport vehicles

Disinfection in animal houses means always a combination between cleaning and disinfection because the high amount of organic material present in such an environment will neutralize rapidly each disinfectant brought to the surface if no cleaning step had been done before. Depending on the kind of material, cleaning gives a 3 log reduction of total bacterial count on the surface and disinfection another 3 log reduction. This means that under practical conditions generally 10³ cfu of bacteria remain per cm² of surface, mostly sporeformers. The choice of disinfectant depends on the purpose of disinfection. In the case of notifiable diseases, it must be active against a defined pathogen. In the case of prophylactic disinfection, it must be active against a broad spectrum of microorganisms.Only disinfectants which are tested for their activity on surfaces which are representative for animal houses e.g. wood should be used, otherwise the failure under practical conditions can be predicted and work, as well as money, will be wasted. The optimal temperature for the liquids used in cleaning and disinfection is 40°C and the optimal temperature of surfaces is 20°C. Colder surfaces require higher concentrations of active substances in the solution, below 10°C the effect of practical disinfection is incomplete. Low air humidity and high air velocity have a negative influence on the action of most disinfectants on surfaces. The amount of disinfectant necessary to disinfect a surface in an animal house is at least 0.4 l/m². Transport vehicles are very difficult to disinfect, especially in winter-time. They should be cleaned with hot water, the remaining liquid should be removed by a suitable vacuum cleaner and the concentration of the disinfectant should be elevated at least for the factor 3. Mechanic action will improve the disinfecting effect in vehicles as well as preliminary disinfection prior cleaning.     

A LABORATORY TEST FOR EVALUATING CHEMICAL STERILIZERS FOR DAIRY FARMS

SUMMARY: A technique for testing chemical sterilizers for dairy farms, using moulded rubber teat cup liners, is described. Results are based on colony counts of rinses taken after disinfection. The test can be used for comparing a new disinfectant with a standard sodium hypochlorite.     

Effect of freezing and storage temperature on stability and antimicrobial activity of an antibiotic mixture used for decontamination of tissue allografts

One of the most important risks to be controlled in tissue banking is the infection associated with the clinical use of auto- and allografts. Thus, tissue disinfection protocols are used, in addition to processing in controlled environments. For this purpose, combinations of antibiotics are designed to ensure a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity. This type of protocol is usually validated by testing its antimicrobial efficacy. In this work, we have studied the effect of several factors on the potential of an antibiotic mixture: container, freezing, storage at 4 °C, storage at ??30 °C and storage at ??80 °C. The molecular stability of the compounds has also been tested, additionally to their efficacy. Our findings show that storage conditions affect the molecular stability of Fungizone and Tobramycin (only in case of frozen storage for the last one). Nevertheless, the solution retains its antimicrobial activity for several weeks. The availability of stored aliquots of disinfectant solution and defining expiry dates for different storage conditions can help to schedule tissue bank tasks.     

Development of a standard test to assess the resistance of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm cells to disinfectants

A standardized disinfectant test for Staphylococcus aureus cells in biofilms was developed. Two disinfectants, the membrane-active compound benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and the oxidizing agent sodium hypochlorite, were used to evaluate the biofilm test. S. aureus formed biofilms on glass, stainless steel, and polystyrene in a simple system with constant nutrient flow that mimicked as closely as possible the conditions used in the current standard European disinfectant test (EN 1040). The biofilm that was formed on glass contained cell clumps and extracellular polysaccharides. The average surface coverage was 60%, and most (92%) of the biofilm cells were viable. Biofilm formation and biofilm disinfection in different experiments were reproducible. For biofilms exposed to BAC and hypochlorite the concentrations needed to achieve 4-log killing were 50 and 600 times higher, respectively, than the concentrations needed to achieve this level of killing with the European phase 1 suspension test cells. Our results show that a standardized disinfectant test for biofilm cells is a useful addition to the current standard tests.     

Disinfection of wooden structures contaminated with Paenibacillus larvae subsp. larvae spores

AIMS: The aim of the study is to examine the disinfection of wood contaminated with Paenibacillus larvae subsp. larvae spores, in order to find a practical decontamination method for hive materials. METHODS AND RESULTS: The number of viable spores recovered after the treatment, on the surface by swabbing, and in the deeper parts of the wood by scraping, was used to test the efficiency of the disinfection. Our results indicate that chemical disinfection is only complete when high concentrations (> 50%) of the disinfectant are used. Heat treatment in general was found to be very effective. The scorching of wood was not satisfactory as it only killed spores at the surface. CONCLUSION: Complete disinfection is only possible with some heat treatments or by using high concentrations of chemical disinfectants. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study puts forward some methods that can provide complete decontamination, which is necessary for an effective control of American foulbrood disease.     

Antimicrobial activity of a formulation for the low temperature disinfection of critical and semi-critical medical equipment and surfaces

The antimicrobial activity of the disinfectant formulation UMONIUM38 (Isopropyl-tridecyl-dimethyl-ammonium; Huckert's International, Nivelles, Belgium) planned for the low temperature disinfection of critical and semi-critical medical equipment and surfaces was evaluated under clean and dirty experimental conditions (high and low concentrations of organic material). The formulation was obtained by a synergic combination of three different active compounds, two alcohols and a quaternary ammonium. The anti-mycobacterial (Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium terrae), and antiviral (Poliovirus type 1, Adenovirus type 5, hepatitis B virus, and human immunodeficiency virus type 1) activities of this formulation were addressed using suspension assays. In addition, surface assays were also used to test the antibacterial (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus hirae) and antimycotic (Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger) activities. The data document the dynamics of the antimicrobial activity under in vitro controlled conditions and highlight the relatively low influence of organic material on its activity.     

Ortho-phthalaldehyde: a possible alternative to glutaraldehyde for high level disinfection

Ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) was tested against a range of organisms including glutaraldehyde-resistant mycobacteria, Bacillus subtilis spores and coat-defective spores. Glutaraldehyde (GTA) and peracetic acid (PAA) were tested for comparative purposes. Both suspension and carrier tests were performed using a range of concentrations and exposure times. All three biocides were very effective (> or = 5 log reduction) against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in suspension tests. OPA and GTA (PAA was not tested) were also very effective against Staph. aureus and Ps. aeruginosa in carrier tests. OPA showed good activity against the mycobacteria tested including the two GTA-resistant strains, but 0.5% w/v OPA was found not to be sporicidal. However, limited activity was found with higher concentrations and pH values. Coat-defective spores were more susceptible to OPA, suggesting that the coat may be responsible for this resistance. The findings of this study suggest that OPA is effective against GTA-resistant mycobacteria and that it is a viable alternative to GTA for high level disinfection.     

Development of a Standard Test To Assess the Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Cells to Disinfectants

A standardized disinfectant test for Staphylococcus aureus cells in biofilms was developed. Two disinfectants, the membrane-active compound benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and the oxidizing agent sodium hypochlorite, were used to evaluate the biofilm test. S. aureus formed biofilms on glass, stainless steel, and polystyrene in a simple system with constant nutrient flow that mimicked as closely as possible the conditions used in the current standard European disinfectant test (EN 1040). The biofilm that was formed on glass contained cell clumps and extracellular polysaccharides. The average surface coverage was 60%, and most (92%) of the biofilm cells were viable. Biofilm formation and biofilm disinfection in different experiments were reproducible. For biofilms exposed to BAC and hypochlorite the concentrations needed to achieve 4-log killing were 50 and 600 times higher, respectively, than the concentrations needed to achieve this level of killing with the European phase 1 suspension test cells. Our results show that a standardized disinfectant test for biofilm cells is a useful addition to the current standard tests.     

Effect of sub-lethal chemical disinfection on the biofilm forming ability,resistance to antibiotics and expression of virulence genes of Salmonella Enteritidis biofilm-surviving cells

Abstract

Although disinfection procedures are widely implemented in food environments, bacteria can survive and present increased virulence/resistance. Since little is known about these phenomena regarding biofilms, this study aimed to investigate the effect of chemical disinfection on biofilm-derived cells of Salmonella Enteritidis. Using a reference strain (NCTC 13349) and a food isolate (350), biofilm susceptibility to benzalkonium chloride (BAC), sodium hypochlorite (SH) and hydrogen peroxide (HP) was evaluated and biofilms were exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of each disinfectant. Biofilm-derived cells were characterized for their biofilm forming ability, antibiotic resistance and expression of virulence-associated genes. Except for a few instances, disinfectant exposure did not alter antibiotic susceptibility. However, SH and HP exposure enhanced the biofilm forming ability of Salmonella Enteritidis NCTC 13349. After BAC and HP exposure, biofilm-derived cells presented a down-regulation of rpoS. Exposure to BAC also revealed an up-regulation of invA, avrA and csgD on Salmonella Enteritidis NCTC 13349. The results obtained suggest that biofilm-derived cells that survive disinfection may represent an increased health risk.     

Impedimetric evaluation of the efficiency of disinfectants against biofilms

An impedimetric evaluation of disinfectant efficacy has shown that biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria mono-cytogenes attached to polyvinyl chloride (PVC), Teflon, Plexiglass, wood, rubber and stainless steel are more resistant than the same bacteria in suspension. Based on the activity against the test-organisms after 1, 3 and 5 min with exposures to 0.5, 1 and 2% of each disinfectant, the resistance towards disinfection was related to the type of hard-surface to which biofilms were attached.     

Disinfecting endoscopes: how not to transmit Mycobacterium tuberculosis by bronchoscopy.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis was cultured from the bronchial washings of two patients who underwent bronchoscopy consecutively with the same bronchoscope. Active pulmonary tuberculosis was later confirmed in the first patient, whereas the second patient had clinical and serologic evidence of infection with respiratory syncytial virus. The bronchoscope had been cleaned with an iodophor disinfectant, which had not destroyed the tubercle bacilli. The agent recommended for chemical disinfection of fibreoptic bronchoscopes is 2% glutaraldehyde solution; the instrument should be immersed in it for 10 to 30 minutes. Five hours'' exposure to ethylene oxide is recommended for sterilization of instruments. These procedures must be preceded by adequate mechanical cleaning. Then transmission of pathogenic organisms during endoscopy, which can result in nosocomial disease, misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment, will be avoided.