Potential Roles for Centromere Pairing in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation

One of the key differences between mitosis and meiosis is the necessity for exchange between homologous chromosomes. Crossing-over between homologous chromosomes is essential for proper meiotic chromosome segregation in most organisms, serving the purpose of linking chromosomes to their homologous partners until they segregate from one another at anaphase I. In several organisms it has been shown that occasional pairs of chromosomes that have failed to experience exchange segregate with reduced fidelity compared to exchange chromosomes, but do not segregate randomly. Such observations support the notion that there are mechanisms, beyond exchange, that contribute to meiotic segregation fidelity. Recent findings indicate that active centromere pairing is important for proper kinetochore orientation and consequently, segregation of non-exchange chromosomes. Here we discuss the implications of these findings for the behavior of meiotic chromosomes.     

Meiotic Chromosome Pairing in Triploid and Tetraploid Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Meiotic chromosome pairing in isogenic triploid and tetraploid strains of yeast and the consequences of polyploidy on meiotic chromosome segregation are studied. Synaptonemal complex formation at pachytene was found to be different in the triploid and in the tetraploid. In the triploid, triple-synapsis, that is, the connection of three homologues at a given site, is common. It can even extend all the way along the chromosomes. In the tetraploid, homologous chromosomes mostly come in pairs of synapsed bivalents. Multiple synapsis, that is, synapsis of more than two homologues in one and the same region, was virtually absent in the tetraploid. About five quadrivalents per cell occurred due to the switching of pairing partners. From the frequency of pairing partner switches it can be deduced that in most chromosomes synapsis is initiated primarily at one end, occasionally at both ends and rarely at an additional intercalary position. In contrast to a considerably reduced spore viability (~40%) in the triploid, spore viability is only mildly affected in the tetraploid. The good spore viability is presumably due to the low frequency of quadrivalents and to the highly regular 2:2 segregation of the few quadrivalents that do occur. Occasionally, however, quadrivalents appear to be subject to 3:1 nondisjunction that leads to spore death in the second generation.     

植物减数分裂染色体配对与染色体组分析的研究进展

简要介绍了植物减数分裂染色体配对研究.综述了减数分裂染色体配对研究在鉴定异源易位系、确定多倍体物种类型、分析物种间亲缘关系和物种的染色体组来源及探讨杂种不育的细胞遗传学机制等诸多方面的应用进展.分析了影响染色体配对的主要因素,如配对控制体系、遗传背景和外界环境条件等,并展望了染色体配对研究与其他技术结合在染色体组分析中的应用前景.     

Heteroduplex DNA Formation and Homolog Pairing in Yeast Meiotic Mutants

Previous studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have identified several meiosis-specific genes whose products are required for wild-type levels of meiotic recombination and for normal synaptonemal complex (SC) formation. Several of these mutants were examined in a physical assay designed to detect heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) intermediates in meiotic recombination. hDNA was not detected in the rec102, mei4 and hop1 mutants; it was observed at reduced levels in red1, mek1 and mer1 strains and at greater than the wild-type level in zip1. These results indicate that the REC102, MEI4, HOP1, RED1, MEK1 and MER1 gene products act before hDNA formation in the meiotic recombination pathway, whereas ZIP1 acts later. The same mutants assayed for hDNA formation were monitored for meiotic chromosome pairing by in situ hybridization of chromosome-specific DNA probes to spread meiotic nuclei. Homolog pairing occurs at wild-type levels in the zip1 and mek1 mutants, but is substantially reduced in mei4, rec102, hop1, red1 and mer1 strains. Even mutants that fail to recombine or to make any SC or sc precursors undergo a significant amount of meiotic chromosome pairing. The in situ hybridization procedure revealed defects in meiotic chromatin condensation in mer1, red1 and hop1 strains.     

The Multiple Roles of Cohesin in Meiotic Chromosome Morphogenesis and Pairing

Sister chromatid cohesion, mediated by cohesin complexes, is laid down during DNA replication and is essential for the accurate segregation of chromosomes. Previous studies indicated that, in addition to their cohesion function, cohesins are essential for completion of recombination, pairing, meiotic chromosome axis formation, and assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC). Using mutants in the cohesin subunit Rec8, in which phosphorylated residues were mutated to alanines, we show that cohesin phosphorylation is not only important for cohesin removal, but that cohesin's meiotic prophase functions are distinct from each other. We find pairing and SC formation to be dependent on Rec8, but independent of the presence of a sister chromatid and hence sister chromatid cohesion. We identified mutations in REC8 that differentially affect Rec8's cohesion, pairing, recombination, chromosome axis and SC assembly function. These findings define Rec8 as a key determinant of meiotic chromosome morphogenesis and a central player in multiple meiotic events.     

A Defective Meiotic Outcome of a Failure in Homologous Pairing and Synapsis Is Masked by Meiotic Quality Control

Successful gamete production is ensured by meiotic quality control, a process in which germ cells that fail in bivalent chromosome formation are eliminated during meiotic prophase. To date, numerous meiotic mutants have been isolated in a variety of model organisms, using defects associated with a failure in bivalent formation as hallmarks of the mutant. Presumably, the meiotic quality control mechanism in those mutants is overwhelmed. In these mutants, all germ cells fail in bivalent formation, and a subset of cells seem to survive the elimination process and develop into gametes. It is possible that mutants that are partially defective in bivalent formation were missed in past genetic screens, because no evident meiotic defects associated with failure in bivalent formation would have been detectable. Meiotic quality control effectively eliminates most failed germ cells, leaving predominately successful ones. Here, we provide evidence supporting this possibility. The Caenorhabditis elegans mrg-1 loss-of-function mutant does not appear to be defective in bivalent formation in diakinesis oocytes. However, defects in homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis during the preceding meiotic prophase, prerequisites for successful bivalent formation, were observed in most, but not all, germ cells. Failed bivalent formation in the oocytes became evident once meiotic quality control was abrogated in the mrg-1 mutant. Both double-strand break repair and synapsis checkpoints are partly responsible for eliminating failed germ cells in the mrg-1 mutant. Interestingly, removal of both checkpoint activities from the mrg-1 mutant is not sufficient to completely suppress the increased germline apoptosis, suggesting the presence of a novel meiotic checkpoint mechanism.     

Two Types of Sites Required for Meiotic Chromosome Pairing in Caenorhabditis Elegans

Previous studies have shown that isolated portions of Caenorhabditis elegans chromosomes are not equally capable of meiotic exchange. These results led to the proposal that a homolog recognition region (HRR), defined as the region containing those sequences enabling homologous chromosomes to pair and recombine, is localized near one end of each chromosome. Using translocations and duplications we have localized the chromosome I HRR to the right end. Whereas the other half of chromosome I did not confer any ability for homologs to pair and recombine, deficiencies in this region dominantly suppressed recombination to the middle of the chromosome. These deletions may have disrupted pairing mechanisms that are secondary to and require an HRR. Thus, the processes of pairing and recombination appear to utilize at least two chromosomal elements, the HRR and other pairing sites. For example, terminal sequences from other chromosomes increase the ability of free duplications to recombine with their normal homologs, suggesting that telomere-associated sequences, homologous or nonhomologous, play a role in facilitating meiotic exchange. Recombination can also initiate at internal sites separated from the HRR by chromosome rearrangement, such as deletions of the unc-54 region of chromosome I. When crossing over was suppressed in a region of chromosome I, compensatory increases were observed in other regions. Thus, the presence of the HRR enabled recombination to occur but did not determine the distribution of the crossover events. It seems most likely that there are multiple initiation sites for recombination once homolog recognition has been achieved.     

Meiotic behaviour of individual chromosomes in allotriploid Alstroemeria hybrids

Chromosome association and chiasma formation were studied in pollen mother cells at metaphase I of four allotriplod BC1 plants (2n=3x=24) obtained from the backcross of the hybrid Alstroemeria aurea x A. inodora with its parent A. inodora. We distinguished the chromosomes of both parental species by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), whereas the individual chromosomes were identified on the basis of their multicolour FISH banding patterns obtained after a second hybridization with two species-specific satellite repeats as probes. All the four BC1 plants possessed two genomes of A. inodora and one of A. aurea. Variable numbers of recombinant chromosomes, resulting from meiotic recombination in the interspecific hybrid, were present in these plants. The homologous A. inodora chromosomes generally formed bivalents, leaving the homoeologous A. aurea chromosomes unassociated. High frequencies of trivalents were observed for the chromosome sets that contained recombinant chromosomes, even when the recombinant segments were small. Chromosome associations in the trivalents were restricted to homologous segments. The implications of the absence of homoeologous chromosome pairing on gamete constitution and prospects for introgression in Alstroemeria are discussed.     

Meiotic cytology and chromosome behaviour in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana

This article reviews the historical development of cytology and cytogenetics in Arabidopsis, and summarizes recent developments in molecular cytogenetics, with special emphasis on meiotic studies. Despite the small genome and small chromosomes of Arabidopsis, considerable progress has been made in developing appropriate cytogenetical techniques for chromosome analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) applied to extended meiotic pachytene chromosomes has resulted in a standardized karyotype (idiogram) for the species that has also been aligned with the genetical map. A better understanding of floral and meiotic development has been achieved by combining cytological studies, based on both sectioning and spreading techniques, with morphometric data and developmental landmarks. The meiotic interphase, preceding prophase I, has been investigated by marking the nuclei undergoing DNA replication with BrdU. This allowed the subclasses of meiotic interphase to be distinguished and also provided a means to time the duration of meiosis and its constituent phases. The FISH technique has been used to analyse in detail the meiotic organization of telomeres and centromeric regions. The results indicate that centromere regions do not play an active role in chromosome pairing and synapsis; however, telomeres pair homologously in advance of general chromosome synapsis. The FISH technique is currently being applied to analysing the pairing and synapsis of interstitial chromosome regions through interphase and prophase I. FISH probes also allow the five bivalents of Arabidopsis to be identified at metaphase I and this has permitted an analysis of chiasma frequencies in individual bivalents, both in wild-type Arabidopsis and in two meiotic mutants.     

Meiotic Disjunction of Homologs in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Is Directed by Pairing and Recombination of the Chromosome Arms but Not by Pairing of the Centromeres

We explored the behavior of meiotic chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by examining the effects of chromosomal rearrangements on the pattern of disjunction and recombination of chromosome III during meiosis. The segregation of deletion chromosomes lacking part or all (telocentric) of one arm was analyzed in the presence of one or two copies of a normal chromosome III. In strains containing one normal and any one deletion chromosome, the two chromosomes disjoined in most meioses. In strains with one normal chromosome and both a left and right arm telocentric chromosome, the two telocentrics preferentially disjoined from the normal chromosome. Homology on one arm was sufficient to direct chromosome disjunction, and two chromosomes could be directed to disjoin from a third. In strains containing one deletion chromosome and two normal chromosomes, the two normal chromosomes preferentially disjoined, but in 4-7% of the tetrads the normal chromosomes cosegregated, disjoining from the deletion chromosome. Recombination between the two normal chromosomes or between the deletion chromosome and a normal chromosome increased the probability that these chromosomes would disjoin, although cosegregation of recombinants was observed. Finally, we observed that a derivative of chromosome III in which the centromeric region was deleted and CEN5 was integrated at another site on the chromosome disjoined from a normal chromosome III with fidelity. These studies demonstrate that it is not pairing of the centromeres, but pairing and recombination along the arms of the homologs, that directs meiotic chromosome segregation.     

X-4 Translocations and Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster Males: Role of Sex Chromosome Pairing

Males carrying certain X-4 translocations exhibit strongly skewed sperm recovery ratios. The X^P4^D half of the translocation disjoins regularly from the Y chromosome and the 4^PX^D half disjoins regularly from the normal 4. Yet the smaller member of each bivalent is recovered in excess of its pairing partner, apparently due to differential gametic lethality. Chromosome recovery probabilities are multiplicative; the viability of each genotype is the product of the recovery probability of its component chromosomes. Meiotic drive can also be caused by deficiency for X heterochromatin. In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R males show the same size dependent chromosome recoveries and multiplicative recovery probabilities found in T(1;4)B^S males. Meiotic drive in In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R males has been shown to be due to X-Y pairing failure. Although pairing is regular in the T(X;4) males, the striking phenotypic parallels suggest a common explanation. The experiments described below show that the two phenomena are, in fact, one and the same. X-4 translocations are shown to have the same effect on recovery of independently assorting chromosomes as does In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R. Addition of pairing sites to the 4^PX^D half of the translocation eliminates drive. A common explanation—failure of the distal euchromatic portion of the X chromosome to participate in X:Y meiotic pairing—is suggested as the cause for drive. The effect of X chromosome breakpoint on X-4 translocation induced meiotic drive is investigated. It is found that translocations with breakpoints distal to 13C on the salivary map do not cause drive while translocations broken proximal to 13C cause drive. The level of drive is related to the position of the breakpoint—the more proximal the breakpoint the greater the drive.     

Meiotic chromosomal variation resulting from irradiation of pollen in maize

The objective of this study was to standardize an induction strategy of chromosome aberrations in maize inbred line L-869. Pollen grains irradiated with 0, 36 and 72 Gy were used for fertilization. Resulting seeds were planted in a greenhouse to assess the number of abnormal meiotic cells. Germination, height, sterility and mortality were verified. Cells with delayed separation of chromosomes, translocation, deficiency, abnormal pairing, later condensation and anaphase bridges were observed. The number of abnormalities increased as the dosage increased but chromosome aberration types were the same regardless of the dosages used. Various chromosome-altered plants were obtained without viability loss     

Centromere Pairing in Early Meiotic Prophase Requires Active Centromeres and Precedes Installation of the Synaptonemal Complex in Maize

Pairing of homologous chromosomes in meiosis is critical for their segregation to daughter cells. In most eukaryotes, clustering of telomeres precedes and facilitates chromosome pairing. In several species, centromeres also form pairwise associations, known as coupling, before the onset of pairing. We found that, in maize (Zea mays), centromere association begins at the leptotene stage and occurs earlier than the formation of the telomere bouquet. We established that centromere pairing requires centromere activity and the sole presence of centromeric repeats is not sufficient for pairing. In several species, homologs of the ZIP1 protein, which forms the central element of the synaptonemal complex in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), play essential roles in centromere coupling. However, we found that the maize ZIP1 homolog ZYP1 installs in the centromeric regions of chromosomes after centromeres form associations. Instead, we found that maize STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE OF CHROMOSOMES6 homolog forms a central element of the synaptonemal complex, which is required for centromere associations. These data shed light on the poorly understood mechanism of centromere interactions and suggest that this mechanism may vary somewhat in different species.     

Catalase in Plodia interpunctella II. Biochemical variation associated with an X-Y translocation

From electrophoretic ovidence of sex-linked inheritance of catalase in Plodia interpunctella it is suggested that the observed exceptional offspring are the result of an X-Y translocation which is proved to occur with a non negligible frequency. The rate of electrophoretically observed translocation was 1.8%. The existence of a Y chromosome in heterogametic females was proved by the finding of positive sex chromatin. The population sample examined was panmictic. The results favour the possibility that the translocation takes place randomly.     

Roles of Hop1 and Mek1 in Meiotic Chromosome Pairing and Recombination Partner Choice in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins Hop1 and Mek1 have been proposed to promote homologous recombination in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by establishment of a barrier against sister chromatid recombination. Therefore, it is interesting to know whether the homologous proteins play a similar role in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Unequal sister chromatid recombination (USCR) was found to be increased in hop1 and mek1 single and double deletion mutants in assays for intrachromosomal recombination (ICR). Meiotic intergenic (crossover) and intragenic (conversion) recombination between homologous chromosomes was reduced. Double-strand break (DSB) levels were also lowered. Notably, deletion of hop1 restored DSB repair in rad50S meiosis. This may indicate altered DSB repair kinetics in hop1 and mek1 deletion strains. A hypothesis is advanced proposing transient inhibition of DSB processing by Hop1 and Mek1 and thus providing more time for repair by interaction with the homologous chromosome. Loss of Hop1 and Mek1 would then result in faster repair and more interaction with the sister chromatid. Thus, in S. pombe meiosis, where an excess of sister Holliday junction over homologous Holliday junction formation has been demonstrated, Hop1 and Mek1 possibly enhance homolog interactions to ensure wild-type level of crossover formation rather than inhibiting sister chromatid interactions.Sexual reproduction in eukaryotes involves formation of haploid gametes from diploid cells by one round of DNA replication, pairing of the homologous chromosomes, and recombination and then by the two meiotic divisions (53). In fungi the gametes differentiate into haploid spores, which germinate to form vegetative cells. Crossover (CO) formation between homologous chromosomes and DNA repair processes between sister chromatids are required for spore viability (10, 55, 58).In vegetative cells homologous recombination (HR) is important for repair of DNA damage and stalled replication forks, with the sister chromatid as the preferred partner (28). Many of the enzymes involved in mitotic HR also contribute to meiotic recombination. In addition, meiosis-specific cytological structures and enzymes enhance recombination frequency (meiotic induction) and shift partner preference from sister chromatids to homologous chromosomes (3, 47, 64, 74). In detail the steps of HR vary between different types of sequence organization (allelic versus sister versus ectopic), between different types of DNA damage, between meiotic and mitotic cells, and between species (10, 55, 58).Meiotic recombination, including CO formation, is initiated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other eukaryotes, DSBs are formed by Spo11. Many cofactors are required (29). The Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog is Rec12, also requiring auxiliary factors whose elimination leads to loss of meiotic DSB formation (12). The 5′ single-strand ends at DSBs are processed by nucleases. In S. cerevisiae the MRX complex made up by the proteins Rad50, Mre11, and Xrs2 is required for this resection, as well as for DSB formation. The corresponding MRN complex of S. pombe (Rad50, Rad32, and Nbs1) is not required for DSB formation but is essential for DSB repair (43, 72). Deletion of rad50, rad32, or ctp1 (homologous to SAE2/COM1 in S. cerevisiae and CtIP in humans) leads to very low spore viability. These proteins are also essential for DSB processing (23, 24, 32, 43, 60, 62).Free DNA 3′ ends at DSBs are recruited for invasion of a sister or homologous chromatid by the strand transfer proteins Rad51 and Dmc1, again involving many accessory proteins (16). This results in the central intermediates of HR: heteroduplex DNA consisting of single strands originating from different chromatids and Holliday junctions (HJs). In S. cerevisiae HJs form preferably between homologs with a two- to sixfold excess over intersister HJs (64). Surprisingly, meiotic HJs form with about a fourfold excess between sisters in S. pombe (11). Eventually the intermediates are resolved into crossover (CO) and noncrossover (NCO) events. COs show exchange of the flanking sequences of the two chromatids involved and usually carry a patch of conversion (unilateral transfer of DNA sequences from one chromatid to its interacting partner) near the DSB site. NCOs are conversion events without associated COs (22). In S. pombe loss of core HR functions leads to very low spore viability: deletion of rad51 but not of dmc1 (20), double mutation of rad54 and rdh54 (7), inactivation of the endonuclease activity encoded by mus81 and eme1 (5, 52), and combined deletion of rad22 and rti1 (homologs of RAD52 of S. cerevisiae). But, differently from the other core functions, Rad22 and Rti1 are not required for CO and NCO (50).Early in meiotic prophase of many eukaryotes, axial elements (called lateral elements in later stages) form along sister chromatids, and pairing of homologous chromosomes is initiated, leading to juxtaposition of the homologous chromosomes along their whole length in the synaptonemal complex (SC) (54). In S. pombe no SC is formed, but linear elements (LEs), resembling axial elements of other eukaryotes, are formed. LEs do not form continuously along the chromosomes (1) but load the proteins Rec10, Hop1, and Mek1 (36, 44, 57), which are homologs of, or at least related, to the S. cerevisiae proteins Red1, Hop1, and Mek1, respectively, localizing to axial/lateral elements (2, 67). Hop1 carries a HORMA domain, also present in proteins associating with axial elements and regulating the progress of recombination in higher eukaryotes: Arabidopsis thaliana (61), Caenorhabditis elegans (9, 41), and mammals (18).In S. cerevisiae localization of Hop1 and Mek1 (meiosis-specific protein kinase) to axial elements is dependent on Red1 (2, 67). Mutation of the three S. cerevisiae genes results in reduction of DSB formation, CO and conversion frequencies, and spore viability (26, 31, 59). Direct comparison of unequal sister chromatid recombination (USCR) frequencies in an assay excluding the scoring of intrachromatid recombination (ICR) revealed no increase in the hop1 null mutant but about fourfold increases in the red1 and mek1 null mutants (69). The S. cerevisiae Hop1, Red1, and Mek1 proteins are involved in biasing meiotic DSB repair to occur between homologous chromosomes rather than between sister chromatids (47). Activated Mek1 kinase is required for the inhibition of sister chromatid-mediated DSB repair by Rad51, when the DMC1 gene is deleted and the meiotic recombination checkpoint is activated (4, 27, 38, 47). For Mek1 activation, phosphorylation of Hop1 by the Mec1/Tel1 kinases is also required (6).Less is known about the S. pombe proteins. Hop1 of S. pombe was identified as a nonsignificant hit by sequence comparison with full-length S. cerevisiae Hop1 and contains an N-terminal HORMA domain and a central zinc finger motif like Hop1 in S. cerevisiae. In addition they share a short homology block toward the C terminus (36). The Mek1 protein of S. pombe shares 34% identity and 54% similarity with its S. cerevisiae counterpart along the whole sequence. It contains an FHA domain in the N-terminal part like the other members of its family of checkpoint kinases and is involved in regulation of the meiotic cell cycle (57). Hop1 and Mek1 are strongly expressed in meiosis but not expressed or only slightly expressed in vegetative cells (42, 57). In prophase both proteins localize to LEs as defined by colocalization with the LE component Rec10 (36). Deletion of the distant RED1 homolog rec10 abolishes LE formation (36, 44) and strongly reduces meiotic recombination (17, 70). Rec10, but not Hop1 and Mek1, is required for localization of Rec7 (a distant homolog of S. cerevisiae Rec114) to meiotic chromosomes (34). Rec7 and Rec10 are required for Rec12 activity (12, 29).Obtaining information on the functions of Hop1 and Mek1 in S. pombe was the aim of the work presented here, especially on their possible roles in homolog versus sister discrimination for DSB repair. Deletion mutants have been studied with respect to spore viability and the frequencies of CO and conversion. They have also been assessed for genetic recombination events between sister chromatids in the known PS1 assay (63) and the newly developed VL1 assay (for details, see Fig. ​Fig.3).3). Physical analysis of DSB formation and repair has been performed in meiotic time course experiments. It is proposed that S. pombe Hop1 and Mek1 are promoting interactions between homologous chromosomes rather than inhibiting interactions between sister chromatids.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.PS1 and VL1 assay systems for intrachromosomal recombination. Strains with constructs carrying repeated DNA sequences have been assayed for prototroph formation either by intrachromatid recombination (ICR, yielding prototrophs only in PS1) or by unequal sister chromatid recombination (USCR, in PS1 and VL1). Crosses of the constructs were performed with strains carrying a deletion of the ade6 gene to exclude other homologous recombination events. (A) The PS1 assay involves copies of the ade6 gene inactivated by either the hot spot mutation M26 or the mutation 469. The repeated sequences are separated by the ura4⁺ marker (63). ICR (left) or USCR (right) between the repeated sequences can lead to formation of adenine prototrophs that have lost the ura4⁺ marker by crossover (CO) or single-strand annealing (SSA) events. Adenine prototrophs maintaining the ura4⁺ marker can derive from noncrossover (NCO) events. Both types of pairing may lead to CO or NCO products. (B) The newly constructed VL1 assay (see the supplemental material) involves different truncations of the ade6 gene separated by the hyg^R marker (also called hphMX6), conferring hygromycin resistance. The left truncation carries a 3′ portion of ade6; the right truncation carries a 5′ portion of ade6. While the gray parts of the truncations are not overlapping, the white sections of 500-bp length are of almost identical sequence, allowing for homologous pairing. CO and SSA products resulting from ICR retain only the central portion of ade6 and remain auxotrophic. Adenine prototrophic CO and NCO products resulting from USCR both retain hygromycin resistance. Note that NCO events may arise through loop formation of one sister chromatid and pairing with a single block (500 bp) of the repeated ade6 sequence (39).     

Chromosomal localization of intergenomic RFLP loci in hexaploid wheat.

Hybridization of radiolabeled wheat DNA probes to genomic DNA digests of compensating nullisomic-tetrasomic lines and ditelosomic lines of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Chinese Spring) can be used to identify intergenomic RFLPs. Sixty-three PstI/BamHI genomic DNA probes and eight cDNA probes were used to determine the chromosomal locations of 223 DNA fragments that define a minimum of 189 RFLP loci. Eighty-four percent of the genomic DNA clones hybridize to fragments located in homoeologous chromosomes and 16% hybridize to fragments located in one chromosome only or to fragments located in nonhomoeologous chromosomes. All of the cDNA probes hybridize to fragments located in homoeologous chromosomes.