Social context affects risk taking by a satellite species in a mixed-species foraging group

Mixed-species flocks of birds form during winter in the easterndeciduousforests of North America. These flocks consist oftwo flock-leading nuclearspecies, tufted titmouse (Baeolophusbicolor) and Carolina chickadee(Poecile carolinensis), andseveral follower, or satellite, species,including downy woodpecker(Picoides pubescens) and white-breastednuthatch (Sitta carolinensis).Hypotheses explaining the adaptivenessof participation in suchmixed-species foraging groups have focused onincreased foragingsuccess and/or decreased predation risk. We tested thepredictionthat if nuthatches join nuclear species to reduce predationrisk,they should be more reluctant to visit an exposed feederin the absence oftitmice than in their presence. When the feederwas positioned 16 m fromforest cover, latency to visit thefeeder was greater for both male and femalenuthatches whentitmice were absent. Removal of titmice had no effect onlatencyat 8 m. In the absence of titmice, nuthatches visited the feederlessfrequently at both distances. These results indicate thatreduced predationrisk is a benefit that satellite species gainby flocking with nuclearspecies.     

Conspecific Influences on Vigilance Behavior in Wild Chimpanzees

Diurnal primates rely on visual monitoring behavior to collect various kinds of ecological and social information. Vigilance behavior is monitoring specifically to detect external threats. Previous studies of vigilance behavior were focused mainly on the influence of predation threats, whereas the influences of conspecific factors, such as intragroup threats, have been relatively unstudied. Individual vigilance is predicted to be inversely related to the group size or the number of individuals nearby if the main target of the vigilance is a predation threat and positively related if the main target of the vigilance is a conspecific threat. I studied wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania, and measured the vigilance duration when they are resting on the ground via 2-min focal observation. In both males and females, vigilance duration increased as the number of individuals nearby increased. This result agrees with the idea that the chimpanzees are vigilant toward other group members. In addition, maternal vigilance monitors and protects the safety of dependent offspring as the duration of maternal vigilance was longer when a dependent infant was separated from its mother than when the offspring was in contact with its mother. The results indicate that the vigilance behavior in wild chimpanzees was affected by conspecific factors.     

Mixed-species primate groups in the kibale forest: Ecological constraints on association

Five species of diurnal primates in the Kibale Forest of western Uganda— red colobus (Colobus badius),black- and- white colobus (Colobus guereza),redtail monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius),blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis),mangabeys (Cercocebus albigena)-often associate in mixed- species groups that vary in size and composition from day to day. Across this range of species, we found no consistent effect of association on feeding rate. In addition, there is no systematic difference between the species- specific individual feeding rates when animals were in mixed- species groups feeding in a specific tree on one day and when individuals of one of the same species were feeding in the same individual tree on a subsequent day. If associating in a mixed- species group lowers the risk of predation, one might expect that the number of vigilant events would decrease in mixed- species groups. However, the only species to exhibit a consistent decrease in vigilant behavior when in association was the red colobus. Redtail monkeys were more vigilant when in association. We predicted that the density and distribution of food resources would both constrain the frequency of association and the size of mixed- species groups. Based on 22 months of data on food resources and bimonthly censuses, we found no relationship between the frequency of association (except mangabeys) or mean mixed- species group size and the density and distribution of food resources for all species. Finally, we examined the behavior of the monkeys in and out of association before and after the playback of a crowned hawk eagle call (Spizaetus coronatus),a known predator. When more species were in association, the amount of time they spent being vigilant following the playback was greater and the response more intense than when fewer species were in association or when the group was alone. The results of this study illustrate that the nature of the costs and benefits of polyspecific associations for these different monkey species are complex and vary from species to species.     

Overriding the oddity effect in mixed-species aggregations: group choice by armored and nonarmored prey

Because "odd" individuals often suffer disproportionately highrates of predation, solitary individuals should join groupswhose members are most similar to themselves in appearance.We examined group-choice decisions by individuals in armoredand nonarmored species and predicted that either (1) the oddityeffect would result in preference for conspecific groups forsolitary individuals of both species, or (2) individuals inthe armored species would prefer to associate with groups containingindividuals of the more vulnerable species. Armored brook sticklebacks(Culaea inconstans) and nonarmored fathead minnows (Pimephalespromelas) have the same predators and often occur together instreams. In mixed-species shoals, yellow perch (Perca flavescens)attacked minnows earlier and more often than sticklebacks. Wetested whether solitary minnows and sticklebacks preferred toassociate with conspecific or heterospecific shoals under conditionsof both low and high predation risk. When predation risk washigh, minnows preferred to associate with conspecifics overheterospecifics, as predicted by the oddity effect. In contrast,sticklebacks preferentially associated with groups of minnowsover groups of conspecifics when predation risk was high. Whenpredation risk was low, solitary individuals of both speciespreferentially associated with conspecific over heterospecificshoals. Stickleback shoal choices under low-risk conditionsmay have been influenced by interspecific competition for food.In feeding experiments, minnows were more efficient foragersthan sticklebacks, so it should benefit sticklebacks to avoidminnows unless predation risk is high. Therefore, for armoredprey, the benefits of associating with more vulnerable preyappear to override the costs of both the oddity effect and foodcompetition when predation risk is high.     

Vigilance in Single- and Mixed-Species Groups of Tamarins (Saguinus labiatus and Saguinus fuscicollis)

By forming larger sizes of groups, individuals benefit from a decrease in vigilance, but the collective vigilance of the group as a whole is not compromised. We examined whether this group size effect is apparent in mixed-species groups of red-bellied tamarins (S. labiatus) and saddleback tamarins (S. fuscicollis) which form stable and permanent associations in the wild. We studied general vigilance and responses to hidden threatening stimuli in five captive groups of each species, while they were housed in single- and mixed-species groups. For vigilance, the individual rate was lower in the larger mixed-species groups than in the smaller single-species groups. In addition, the amount of time when at least one individual was vigilant was higher in mixed-species groups. This suggests that the tamarins alter their vigilance behavior in the presence of the other species. In response to hidden threats, both species performed brief vigilance checks and frequencies of checking did not differ in single- and mixed-species groups. However, both species had a significant reduction in the mean duration per check, and there was a reduced total amount of time spent vigilance checking in the mixed-species groups compared to the single-species groups, demonstrating the group size effect. Overall the mixed-species groups had a higher number and mean duration of checking than the smaller single-species groups. Given that the two species share a common set of predators, and respond to each other's alarm calls, these findings provide strong evidence that individuals of both tamarin species may be able to benefit from forming mixed-species groups via improved vigilance and monitoring of threats.     

Costs and benefits of flocking in foraging white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons): effects of resource depletion

This study investigated the costs and benefits of flocking in white-fronted geese Anser albifrons foraging on rice grains in Japan. The time budgets of focal geese were recorded, and the effects of flock size on the proportions of time spent in vigilant and agonistic behaviour were tested. The results showed that the decline in vigilance level and consequent increase in foraging time were beneficial results of flocking whereas agonistic interactions, a potential cost of flocking, did not increase with increasing flock size. However, seasonal variation in flock size suggested that exploitative competition could be a cost of flocking; the sizes of flocks in spring, when resource depletion had progressed, were significantly reduced compared with those in autumn. An experimental increase in rice density resulted in a significant increase in flock size. We conclude that the flock size of foraging white-fronted geese is a result of compromise between a constant benefit of flocking (i.e. decline in vigilance level) and a cost of flocking varying with food abundance (i.e. exploitative competition).     

Development of interspecific recognition behavior in the antsManica rubida andFormica selysi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) reared in mixed-species groups

The purpose of this study was to determine the role of early social experience on the ontogeny of kin and nestmate recognition in ants by means of both behavioral and chemical analysis. Workers of two ant species,Manica rubida (Myrmicinae) andFormica selysi (Formicinae), were reared in homospecific groups (control) or in artificial heterospecific groups (mixed), created less than 5 h after their emergence. Recognition was evaluated between unfamiliar individuals of different species reared in control and mixed groups for periods of 5, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h and 8, 15, 30, 60, or 90 days after emergence. Heterospecifically reared individuals of both species gradually became tolerant of allospecific individuals from control groups. Moreover, homospecifically reared individuals did not aggress allospecific individuals reared in mixed groups. During the course of familiarization between the species, there were modifications of the chemical recognition signals. In mixed groups, hydrocarbon profiles of both species acquire gradually some of the components characteristic of their heterospecific nestmates. These experiments showed that allospecific recognition required the acquisition of a minimal quantity of allospecific cues. The phenomenon provided an another example of the relationship between tolerance and the chemical cues displayed by both species. The results suggested that the individual recognized the allospecific cues borne on each individual's body surface and/or that each individual learned and memorized allospecific cues during its early life. Therefore, each individual might develop a template encoding the allospecific and the conspecific cues to characterize nestmates.