DNA-Binding ability of GAGA zinc finger depends on the nature of amino acids present in the beta-hairpin

The GAGA factor of Drosophila melanogaster uses a single Cys2-His2-type zinc finger for specific DNA binding. Comparative sequence alignment of the GAGA zinc finger core with other structurally characterized zinc fingers reveals that the beta-hairpin of the GAGA zinc finger prefers amino acids with an aliphatic side-chain different from those of other zinc fingers. To probe the substitution effect of aromatic amino acids in the beta-hairpin on the DNA binding, three mutant peptides were designed by substituting consensus phenylalanine, an aromatic amino acid, at key positions in the beta-hairpin region. The metal-binding and the overall fold of the mutant peptides are very similar to those of the wild-type as shown by UV-vis absorption spectroscopy and circular dichroism spectroscopy. However, the gel mobility shift assay and isothermal calorimetric studies demonstrated that none of the mutants are able to bind the cognate DNA substrate, although the mutation is confined only to the beta-hairpin region. The present results suggest that the nature of the amino acids in the beta-hairpin plays an important role in the DNA-binding of the GAGA factor protein.     

An arginine residue instead of a conserved leucine residue in the recognition helix of the finger 3 of Zif268 stabilizes the domain structure and mediates DNA binding

The Cys(2)His(2)-type zinc finger is a common DNA binding motif that is widely used in the design of artificial zinc finger proteins. In almost all Cys(2)His(2)-type zinc fingers, position 4 of the α-helical DNA-recognition site is occupied by a Leu residue involved in formation of the minimal hydrophobic core. However, the third zinc finger domain of native Zif268 contains an Arg residue instead of the conserved Leu. Our aim in the present study was to clarify the role of this Arg in the formation of a stable domain structure and in DNA binding by substituting it with a Lys, Leu, or Hgn, which have different terminal side-chain structures. Assessed were the metal binding properties, peptide conformations, and DNA-binding abilities of the mutants. All three mutant finger 3 peptides exhibited conformations and thermal stabilities similar to the wild-type peptide. In DNA-binding assays, the Lys mutant bound to target DNA, though its affinity was lower than that of the wild-type peptide. On the other hand, the Leu and Hgn mutants had no ability to bind DNA, despite the similarity in their secondary structures to the wild-type. Our results demonstrate that, as with the Leu residue, the aliphatic carbon side chain of this Arg residue plays a key role in the formation of a stable zinc finger domain, and its terminal guanidinium group appears to be essential for DNA binding mediated through both electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bonding with DNA phosphate backbone.     

Structure of the Wilms tumor suppressor protein zinc finger domain bound to DNA

The zinc finger domain of the Wilms tumor suppressor protein (WT1) contains four canonical Cys(2)His(2) zinc fingers. WT1 binds preferentially to DNA sequences that are closely related to the EGR-1 consensus site. We report the structure determination by both X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy of the WT1 zinc finger domain in complex with DNA. The X-ray structure was determined for the complex with a cognate 14 base-pair oligonucleotide, and composite X-ray/NMR structures were determined for complexes with both the 14 base-pair and an extended 17 base-pair DNA. This combined approach allowed unambiguous determination of the position of the first zinc finger, which is influenced by lattice contacts in the crystal structure. The crystal structure shows the second, third and fourth zinc finger domains inserted deep into the major groove of the DNA where they make base-specific interactions. The DNA duplex is distorted in the vicinity of the first zinc finger, with a cytidine twisted and tilted out of the base stack to pack against finger 1 and the tip of finger 2. By contrast, the composite X-ray/NMR structures show that finger 1 continues to follow the major groove in the solution complexes. However, the orientation of the helix is non-canonical, and the fingertip and the N terminus of the helix project out of the major groove; as a consequence, the zinc finger side-chains that are commonly involved in base recognition make no contact with the DNA. We conclude that finger 1 helps to anchor WT1 to the DNA by amplifying the binding affinity although it does not contribute significantly to binding specificity. The structures provide molecular level insights into the potential consequences of mutations in zinc fingers 2 and 3 that are associated with Denys-Drash syndrome and nephritic syndrome. The mutations are of two types, and either destabilize the zinc finger structure or replace key base contact residues.     

CCHX zinc finger derivatives retain the ability to bind Zn(II) and mediate protein-DNA interactions

Classical (CCHH) zinc fingers are among the most common protein domains found in eukaryotes. They function as molecular recognition elements that mediate specific contact with DNA, RNA, or other proteins and are composed of a betabetaalpha fold surrounding a single zinc ion that is ligated by two cysteine and two histidine residues. In a number of variant zinc fingers, the final histidine is not conserved, and in other unrelated zinc binding domains, residues such as aspartate can function as zinc ligands. To test whether the final histidine is required for normal folding and the DNA-binding function of classical zinc fingers, we focused on finger 3 of basic Krüppel-like factor. The structure of this domain was determined using NMR spectroscopy and found to constitute a typical classical zinc finger. We generated a panel of substitution mutants at the final histidine in this finger and found that several of the mutants retained some ability to fold in the presence of zinc. Consistent with this result, we showed that mutation of the final histidine had only a modest effect on DNA binding in the context of the full three-finger DNA-binding domain of basic Krüppel-like factor. Further, the zinc binding ability of one of the point mutants was tested and found to be indistinguishable from the wild-type domain. These results suggest that the final zinc chelating histidine is not an essential feature of classical zinc fingers and have implications for zinc finger evolution, regulation, and the design of experiments testing the functional roles of these domains.     

DNA-induced alpha-helix capping in conserved linker sequences is a determinant of binding affinity in Cys(2)-His(2) zinc fingers

High-affinity, sequence-specific DNA binding by Cys(2)-His(2) zinc finger proteins is mediated by both specific protein-base interactions and non-specific contacts between charged side-chains and the phosphate backbone. In addition, in DNA complexes of multiple zinc fingers, protein-protein interactions between the finger units contribute to the binding affinity. We present NMR evidence for another contribution to high- affinity binding, a highly specific DNA-induced helix capping involving residues in the linker sequence between fingers. Capping at the C terminus of the alpha-helix in each zinc finger, incorporating a consensus TGEKP linker sequence that follows each finger, provides substantial binding energy to the DNA complexes of zinc fingers 1-3 of TFIIIA (zf1-3) and the four zinc fingers of the Wilms' tumor suppressor protein (wt1-4). The same alpha-helix C-capping motif is observed in the X-ray structures of four other protein-DNA complexes. The structures of each of the TGEKP linkers in these complexes can be superimposed on the linker sequences in the zf1-3 complex, revealing a remarkable similarity in both backbone and side-chain conformations. The canonical linker structures from the zinc-finger-DNA complexes have been compared to the NMR structure of the TGEKP linker connecting fingers 1 and 2 in zf1-3 in the absence of DNA. This comparison reveals that additional stabilization likely arises in the DNA complexes from hydrogen bonding between the backbone amide of E3 and the side-chain O(gamma) of T1 in the linker. We suggest that these DNA-induced C-capping interactions provide a means whereby the multiple-finger complex, which must necessarily be domain-flexible in the unbound state as it searches for the correct DNA sequence, can be "snap-locked" in place once the correct DNA sequence is encountered. These observations provide a rationale for the high conservation of the TGEKP linker sequences in Cys(2)-His(2) zinc finger proteins.     

Keep Your Fingers Off My DNA: Protein–Protein Interactions Mediated by C2H2 Zinc Finger Domains

Cys2-His2 (C2H2) zinc finger domains (ZFs) were originally identified as DNA-binding domains, and uncharacterized domains are typically assumed to function in DNA binding. However, a growing body of evidence suggests an important and widespread role for these domains in protein binding. There are even examples of zinc fingers that support both DNA and protein interactions, which can be found in well-known DNA-binding proteins such as Sp1, Zif268, and Ying Yang 1 (YY1). C2H2 protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are proving to be more abundant than previously appreciated, more plastic than their DNA-binding counterparts, and more variable and complex in their interactions surfaces. Here we review the current knowledge of over 100 C2H2 zinc finger-mediated PPIs, focusing on what is known about the binding surface, contributions of individual fingers to the interaction, and function. An accurate understanding of zinc finger biology will likely require greater insights into the potential protein interaction capabilities of C2H2 ZFs.     

Mechanism of DNA binding by the ADR1 zinc finger transcription factor as determined by SPR

The ADR1 protein recognizes a six base-pair consensus DNA sequence using two zinc fingers and an adjacent accessory motif. Kinetic measurements were performed on the DNA-binding domain of ADR1 using surface plasmon resonance. Binding by ADR1 was characterized to two known native binding sequences from the ADH2 and CTA1 promoter regions, which differ in two of the six consensus positions. In addition, non-specific binding by ADR1 to a random DNA sequence was measured. ADR1 binds the native sites with nanomolar affinities. Remarkably, ADR1 binds non-specific DNA with affinities only approximately tenfold lower than the native sequences. The specific and non-specific binding affinities are conferred mainly by differences in the association phase of DNA binding. The association rate for the complex is strongly influenced by the proximal accessory region, while the dissociation reaction and specificity of binding are controlled by the two zinc fingers. Binding kinetics of two ADR1 mutants was also examined. ADR1 containing an R91K mutation in the accessory region bound with similar affinity to wild-type, but with slightly less sequence specificity. The R91K mutation was observed to increase binding affinity to a suboptimal sequence by decreasing the complex dissociation rate. L146H, a change-of-specificity mutation at the +3 position of the second zinc finger, bound its preferred sequence with a slightly higher affinity than wild-type. The L146H mutant indicates that beneficial protein-DNA contacts provide similar levels of stabilization to the complex, whether they are hydrogen-bonding or van der Waals interactions.     

A mutation outside the two zinc fingers of ADR1 can suppress defects in either finger.

A second-site mutation that restored DNA binding to ADR1 mutants altered at different positions in the two zinc fingers was identified. This mutation (called IS1) was a conservative change of arginine 91 to lysine in a region amino terminal to the two zinc fingers and known from previous experiments to be necessary for DNA binding. IS1 increased binding to the UAS1 sequence two- to sevenfold for various ADR1 mutants and twofold for wild-type ADR1. The change of arginine 91 to glycine decreased binding twofold, suggesting that this arginine is involved in DNA binding in the wild-type protein. The increase in binding by IS1 did not involve protein-protein interactions between the two ADR1 monomers, nor did it require the presence of the sequences flanking UAS1. However, the effect of IS1 was influenced by the sequence of the first finger, suggesting that interactions between the region amino terminal to the fingers and the fingers themselves could exist. A model for the role of the amino-terminal region based on these results and sequence homologies with other DNA-binding motifs is proposed.     

Effects of bulkiness and hydrophobicity of an aliphatic amino acid in the recognition helix of the GAGA zinc finger on the stability of the hydrophobic core and DNA binding affinity

The GAGA factor of Drosophila melanogaster uses a single Cys 2His 2-type zinc finger for specific DNA binding. The conformation and DNA binding mode of the GAGA zinc finger are similar to those of other structurally characterized zinc fingers. In almost all Cys 2His 2-type zinc fingers, the fourth position of the DNA-recognizing helix is occupied by the Leu residue involved in the formation of the minimal hydrophobic core. However, no systematic study on the precise role of the Leu residue in the hydrophobic core formation and DNA binding function has been reported. In this study, the Leu residue is substituted with other aliphatic amino acids having different side chain lengths and hydrophobicities, namely, Ile, Val, Aib, and Ala. The metal binding properties were studied by UV-vis spectroscopy. The peptide conformations were examined by CD and NMR spectroscopies. Furthermore, the DNA binding ability was examined with a gel mobility shift assay. Though the Ile, Val, and Aib mutants exhibited conformations similar to those of the wild type, the DNA binding affinity decreased as the side chain length of the amino acid decreased. Interestingly, the Val mutant can bind to the cognate DNA, while Aib cannot, in spite of the similarity in their secondary structures based on the CD measurements. Variable-temperature NMR experiments clearly indicated differences in the stability of the hydrophobic core between the Val and Aib mutants. This study demonstrates that the bulkiness of the conserved aliphatic residue is important in the formation of the well-packed minimal hydrophobic core and proper ternary structure and that the hydrophobic core stabilization is apparently related to the DNA binding function of the GAGA zinc finger.     

Four of the seven zinc fingers of the Evi-1 myeloid-transforming gene are required for sequence-specific binding to GA(C/T)AAGA(T/C)AAGATAA.

Expression of the Evi-1 gene is activated in murine myeloid leukemias by retroviral insertions and in human acute myelogenous leukemia by translocations and inversions involving chromosome band 3q26 where the gene resides. Aberrant expression of the Evi-1 gene has been shown to interfere with myeloid differentiation, which is proposed to be the basis for its role in leukemias. The Evi-1 gene encodes a 145-kDa DNA-binding protein containing two domains of seven and three Cys2-His2 zinc fingers. Previous studies identified a portion of the consensus DNA-binding sequence for the first domain of zinc fingers. The experiments presented here extend these studies and demonstrate that the first domain recognizes a consensus of 15 nucleotides consisting of GA(C/T)AAGA(T/C)AAGATAA. The first three fingers of the first domain do not detectably bind DNA but contribute to the binding by conferring a relative specificity for GACAA verses GATAA in the first position. The first three fingers also contribute to optimal binding of the 15-nucleotide consensus sequence.