Differential translocation of protein precursors across SecY-deficient membranes of Escherichia coli: SecY is not obligatorily required for translocation of certain secretory proteins in vitro.

SecY, a component of the protein translocation system in Escherichia coli, was depleted at a nonpermissive temperature in a strain which had a temperature-sensitive polar effect on the expression of its secY. Membrane vesicles prepared from these cells, when grown at the nonpermissive temperature, contained about 5% SecY and similarly low levels of SecG. As expected, translocation of alkaline phosphatase precursors across these SecY-deficient membranes was severely impaired and appeared to be directly related to the decrease of SecY amounts. However, despite such a dramatic reduction in SecY and SecG levels, these membranes exhibited 50 to 70% of the wild-type translocation activity, including the processing of the signal peptide, of OmpA precursor (proOmpA). This translocation activity in SecY-deficient membranes was still SecA and ATP dependent and was not unique to proOmpA, as lipoprotein and lambda receptor protein precursors were also transported efficiently. Membranes that were reconstituted from these SecY-depleted membranes contained undetectable amounts of SecY yet were also shown to possess substantial translocation activity for proOmpA. These results indicate that the requirement of SecY for translocation is not obligatory for all secretory proteins and may depend on the nature of precursors. Consequently, it is unlikely that SecY is the essential core channel through which all precursors traverse across membranes; rather, SecY probably contributes to efficiency and specificity.     

SecA protein, a peripheral protein of the Escherichia coli plasma membrane, is essential for the functional binding and translocation of proOmpA.

We have reconstituted protein translocation across plasma membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli using purified proOmpA and trigger factor, a 63 kd soluble protein. Treatment of membrane vesicles with urea inactivates them for translocation unless a factor present in cytoplasmic extracts is added during the translocation reaction. Sedimentation analysis showed that the stimulatory activity is of distinctly higher mol. wt than trigger factor. Cytoplasmic extracts from a strain that greatly overproduces the SecA protein are highly enriched in the stimulatory activity for untreated membranes and restore translocation to urea-treated membranes, suggesting that this protein is the stimulatory factor. This assay was used to monitor the isolation of SecA protein from the overproducing strain. The purified protein is soluble, yet binds peripherally to membranes with high affinity and supports translocation. Using pure proOmpA, SecA protein, trigger factor and urea-treated membranes, the protein export process was resolved into binding and translocation steps. We find that proOmpA binds to membrane vesicles with or without SecA protein, but that translocation only occurs when SecA was bound prior to proOmpA.     

The role of topogenic sequences in the movement of proteins through membranes.

Recent advances have led to considerable convergence in ideas of the way topogenic sequences act to translocate proteins across various intracellular membranes (Table 2). Whereas co-translational translocation and processing were previously considered the norm at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, several instances of post-translational translocation into endoplasmic reticulum microsomes in vitro have now been described. However, it must be noted that post-translational translocation in vitro is much less efficient than when endoplasmic reticulum membranes are present during translation, and it is possible that in the intact cell translocation occurs during translation. Movement of proteins into chloroplasts and mitochondria occurs after translation. When translocation is post-translational, proteins may perhaps traverse the membrane as folded domains, and the conformational effects of topogenic sequences on these domains may be as envisaged in Wickner's 'membrane-trigger hypothesis'. Both signal and transit sequences possess amphipathic structures which are capable of interacting with phospholipid bilayers, and these interactions may disturb the bilayer sufficiently to allow entry of the following domains of protein. There is increasing evidence that GTP is required to bind ribosomes and their associated nascent chains to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Precisely how the cell's energy is applied to achieve translocation is not clear, but one possibility at the endoplasmic reticulum is that a GTP-hydrolysing transducing mechanism may exist to couple signal sequence receptor binding to movement of the nascent chain across the membrane. Electrochemical gradients are required for protein movement to the mitochondrial inner membrane and across the bacterial inner membrane. Cytoplasmic factors such as SRP, the secA gene product or a 40 kDa protein (for mitochondrial precursors) may act by binding to topogenic sequences and preventing precursor proteins as they are translated from folding into forms which cannot be translocated. Specificity in the cell may be achieved both by targetting interactions between these cytoplasmic factors and their receptors located in target membranes, and also by specific binding of the topogenic sequences to specific proteins integrated into the target membranes. Possible candidates for the latter are the protein of microsomal membranes that reacts with a photoreactive signal peptide to give a 45 kDa complex (Fig. 1), the secY gene product of the bacterial inner membrane, and receptors on the outer membranes of chloroplasts and mitochondria. Whether these aid translocation as well as recognition is not clear.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Temperature-induced changes of spin-labelled radioactive lipids in isolated guinea pig liver microsomal membranes before and in mitochondrial membranes after their translocation.

Lipids of isolated guinea pig liver microsomal membranes were labelled biosynthetically with isomeric doxyl stearic acid and temperature-induced changes of these membranes were studied by electron spin resonance. A noticeable discontinuity was detected at 10--12 degree C with 12- or 16-doxyl stearic acid containing membrane lipids which was attributed to the spin-labelled lipid--microsomal membrane protein interactions since no such discontinuity was detected in liposomes prepared from total lipid extracts of microsomal membranes. When microsomal membranes containing radioactive isomeric spin-labelled lipids were incubated with unlabelled mitochondria, reisolated mitochondrial membranes contained translocated radioactive isomeric spin-labelled lipids. Temperature-induced changes in these membranes showed no discontinuity with either isomeric doxyl stearic acid derivative, establishing a difference in the environment of translocated lipids in the membrane donor compared with that in the membrane acceptor. Microsomal membranes recovered from translocation experiments showed the same behaviour as the original membranes and exhibited the same discontinuity at 10--12 degree C, establishing that the translocation incubation itself did not alter the spin-labelled lipid interaction within these membranes. Studies of the loss of paramagnetism of spin-labelled lipids in microsomal membranes before and in mitochondrial membranes after their translocation showed a significant difference and suggested that both the outer and the inner mitochondrial membranes might have been involved.     

Archaeal protein translocation crossing membranes in the third domain of life.

Proper cell function relies on correct protein localization. As a first step in the delivery of extracytoplasmic proteins to their ultimate destinations, the hydrophobic barrier presented by lipid-based membranes must be overcome. In contrast to the well-defined bacterial and eukaryotic protein translocation systems, little is known about how proteins cross the membranes of archaea, the third and most recently described domain of life. In bacteria and eukaryotes, protein translocation occurs at proteinaceous sites comprised of evolutionarily conserved core components acting in concert with other, domain-specific elements. Examination of available archaeal genomes as well as cloning of individual genes from other archaeal strains reveals the presence of homologues to selected elements of the bacterial or eukaryotic translocation machines. Archaeal genomic searches, however, also reveal an apparent absence of other, important components of these two systems. Archaeal translocation may therefore represent a hybrid of the bacterial and eukaryotic models yet may also rely on components or themes particular to this domain of life. Indeed, considering the unique chemical composition of the archaeal membrane as well as the extreme conditions in which archaea thrive, the involvement of archaeal-specific translocation elements could be expected. Thus, understanding archaeal protein translocation could reveal the universal nature of certain features of protein translocation which, in some cases, may not be readily obvious from current comparisons of bacterial and eukaryotic systems. Alternatively, elucidation of archaeal translocation could uncover facets of the translocation process either not yet identified in bacteria or eukaryotes, or which are unique to archaea. In the following, the current status of our understanding of protein translocation in archaea is reviewed.     

Secretion in yeast: in vitro analysis of the sec53 mutant.

Of central importance to studying protein translocation via a combined genetic and biochemical approach is the in vitro analysis of yeast conditionally-lethal secretory mutants. Analysis of sec53 presented an opportunity not only to see if mutants could be examined in recently developed yeast in vitro translocation systems, but also to characterize further the nature of this mutant originally postulated to be defective in protein translocation. Membranes from sec53 were capable of translocating and glycosylating nascent prepro-alpha-factor in vitro in both sec53 and wild-type lysates at temperatures that were non-permissive for growth of the mutant cells. These results suggested that the Sec53 protein does not function directly in the translocation and glycosylation of prepro-alpha-factor. To examine this point further, we isolated membranes from sec53 cells that had been grown at the non-permissive temperature prior to disruption. In such cases, regardless of assay temperature, membranes from sec53 cells efficiently translocated but failed to glycosylate prepro-alpha-factor in vitro. The in vitro phenotype of sec53 could be mimicked by isolating rough microsomes from wild-type cells that had been grown for 1 h in the presence of tunicamycin. Together, these results demonstrate that sec53 is not defective in translocation, rather in assembly of the dolichol-oligosaccharide substrate needed for N-linked glycosylation.     

Translocation of Protein Kinase C in Anterior Pituitary Tumor Cells

Previous studies have shown that phorbol esters and lithium each stimulate the secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by the anterior pituitary tumor cell line AtT20/D16-16. Pretreatment with either lithium or phorbol ester desensitizes the cells to subsequent stimulation by phorbol ester. An early consequence of phorbol ester action in other systems is the translocation of protein kinase C from cytosol to membranes. We have assayed protein kinase C activity in cytosol and membranes of AtT20 cells after treatment with phorbol dibutyrate, lithium, or other agents that stimulate secretion of ACTH in these cells. Phorbol dibutyrate clearly induced translocation of protein kinase C, but lithium treatment did not cause translocation itself, nor did pretreatment with lithium affect the translocation induced by phorbol dibutyrate. These results are consistent with a role for translocation of protein kinase C in the stimulatory and desensitizing effects of phorbol esters but fail to implicate translocation in the actions of lithium on AtT20 cells.     

Secretion in yeast: preprotein binding to a membrane receptor and ATP- dependent translocation are sequential and separable events in vitro

We have used a cytosol-free assay in which efficient translocation and signal peptide cleavage is achieved when the affinity-purified precursor of OmpA (proOmpA) is diluted out of 8 M urea into a suspension of yeast rough microsomes. This aspect of protein targeting and transport occurs in two discernible steps: (a) in the absence of ATP and cytosolic factors, the precursor binds to the membranes but is not translocated; (b) addition of ATP results in the translocation of the bound precursor and its processing to the mature form. The binding to microsomes of radiolabeled proOmpA is saturable and inhibited by the addition of unlabeled proOmpA but not by mature OmpA or other proteins. The binding of radiolabeled prepro-alpha-factor is also effectively competed by other preproteins, but not by mature ones. Scatchard analysis showed the Kd of proOmpA to be 7.5 X 10(-9) M. Binding is most likely protein mediated as treatment of the microsomes with the protease papain was found to be inhibitory. These results represent the first functional characterization of secretory protein precursor binding to membranes. Alkylation of the microsomes with NEM, washing the membranes with urea or using membranes from the (translocation) mutant ptll at the nonpermissive temperature, did not affect binding, but did eliminate the subsequent ATP-dependent translocation. The ability to subdivide translocation into individual reactions provides a more precise means of determining the membrane components involved in this process.     

Segregation of the polypeptide translocation apparatus to regions of the endoplasmic reticulum containing ribophorins and ribosomes. I. Functional tests on rat liver microsomal subfractions

A preparation of rat liver microsomes containing 70% of the total cellular endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes was subfractionated by isopycnic density centrifugation. Twelve subfractions of different ribosome content ranging in density from 1.06 to 1.29 were obtained and analyzed with respect to marker enzymes, RNA, and protein content, as well as the capacity of these membranes to bind 80S ribosomes in vitro. After removal of native polysomes from these microsomal subfractions by puromycin in a buffer of high ionic strength their capacity to rebind 80S ribosomes approached levels found in the corresponding native membranes before ribosome stripping. This indicates that in vitro rebinding of ribosomes occurs to the same sites occupied in the cell by membrane-bound polysomes. Microsomes in the microsomal subfractions were also tested for their capacity to effect the translocation of nascent secretory proteins into the microsomal lumen utilizing a rabbit reticulocyte translation system programmed with mRNA coding for the precursor of human placental lactogen. Membranes from microsomes with the higher isopycnic density and a high ribosome content showed the highest translocation activity, whereas membranes derived from smooth microsomes had only a very low translocation activity. These results indicate the membranes of the rough and smooth portions of the endoplasmic reticulum are functionally differentiated so that sites for ribosome binding and the translocation of nascent polypeptides are segregated to the rough domain of the organelle.     

The Tom channel in the mitochondrial outer membrane: alive and kicking

The targeting of newly-made polypeptides to specific membranes, and the subsequent ability of a membrane to allow only certain polypeptides into its compartment, are essential to maintain the ultrastructure of Eukaryotic cells. Distinct oligomeric protein complexes in each cellular membrane catalyse these translocation processes. A recent report [Hill K et al. Nature 1998;395:516-521 (Ref. 1)] of the reconstitution of the translocation channel from the mitochondrial outer membrane, after producing the major structural component of the channel by recombinant means, promises a system to dissect in molecular detail the exact working of one of these protein translocation machines.     

Wild type and mutant signal peptides of Escherichia coli outer membrane lipoprotein interact with equal efficiency with mammalian signal recognition particle

The signal peptide of the outer membrane lipoprotein (OMLP) of Escherichia coli was shown to be capable of promoting protein translocation across mammalian microsomal membranes in vitro. We assayed translocation of a fusion protein containing the OMLP signal peptide and nine amino acids of OMLP fused in frame to beta-lactamase. The efficiency with which the mammalian translocation machinery recognizes and accepts the OMLP signal peptide as substrate is indistinguishable from that of mammalian secretory proteins. Upon translocation mammalian signal peptidase processes the pre-OMLP-beta-lactamase protein at different sites than are utilized in vivo by E. coli OMLP signal peptidase (signal peptidase II) but that can be predicted as mammalian signal peptidase cleavage sites. Mutants in the OMLP signal peptide were tested for their ability to promote translocation of the fusion protein in this assay system. It has been shown previously that mutants in the positively charged amino acids at the amino terminus of the signal peptide severely delay the translocation of OMLP in vivo in E. coli. However, these mutants had no detectable effect either on signal recognition by mammalian signal recognition particle or on the efficiency of translocation itself.     

SecA protein needs both acidic phospholipids and SecY/E protein for functional high-affinity binding to the Escherichia coli plasma membrane.

Translocation of preproteins across the Escherichia coli inner membrane requires acidic phospholipids. We have studied the translocation of the precursor protein proOmpA across inverted inner membrane vesicles prepared from cells depleted of phosphatidylglycerol and cardiolipin. These membranes support neither translocation nor the translocation ATPase activity of the SecA subunit of preprotein translocase. We now report that inner membrane vesicles which are depleted of acidic phospholipids are unable to bind SecA protein with high affinity. These membranes can be restored to translocation competence by fusion with liposomes containing phosphatidylglycerol, suggesting that the defect in SecA binding is a direct effect of phospholipid depletion rather than a general derangement of inner membrane structure. Reconstitution of SecY/E, the membrane-embedded domain of translocase, into proteoliposomes containing predominantly a single synthetic acidic lipid, dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol, allows efficient catalysis of preprotein translocation.     

Mitochondrial precursor proteins are imported through a hydrophilic membrane environment

We have analyzed how translocation intermediates of imported mitochondrial precursor proteins, which span contact sites, interact with the mitochondrial membranes. F1-ATPase subunit beta (F1 beta) was trapped at contact sites by importing it into Neurospora mitochondria in the presence of low levels of nucleoside triphosphates. This F1 beta translocation intermediate could be extracted from the membranes by treatment with protein denaturants such as alkaline pH or urea. By performing import at low temperatures, the ADP/ATP carrier was accumulated in contact sites of Neurospora mitochondria and cytochrome b2 in contact sites of yeast mitochondria. These translocation intermediates were also extractable from the membranes at alkaline pH. Thus, translocation of precursor proteins across mitochondrial membranes seems to occur through an environment which is accessible to aqueous perturbants. We propose that proteinaceous structures are essential components of a translocation apparatus present in contact sites.     

Studies on the lipid dependency and mechanism of the translocation of the mitochondrial precursor protein apocytochrome c across model membranes

The lipid dependency of apocytochrome c binding to model membranes and of the translocation of the precursor protein across these membranes was studied by using large unilamellar, trypsin-containing vesicles. These vesicles were improved with respect to those used in a previous article (Rietveld, A., and de Kruijff, B. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 6704-6706), in the sense that a lower amount of trypsin was enclosed. In mixed egg phosphatidylcholine/bovine brain phosphatidylserine vesicles, both the Kd of apocytochrome c binding (about 20 microM) and the number of phosphatidylserine molecules interacting with the protein was found to be constant. When the phosphatidylserine fraction in the vesicles is more than 15-30% apocytochrome c addition results in the exposure of (a part of) the protein to the internal, trypsin-containing vesicle medium, which process we conceive as a translocation event. Also the interaction of apocytochrome c with vesicles composed of phosphatidylcholine and another acidic phospholipid in a 1:1 ratio, leads to the translocation of the protein across the model membrane. The affinity of this binding was found to be in the order cardiolipin greater than phosphatidylglycerol greater than phosphatidylinositol greater than phosphatidylserine. By varying the lipid composition of the vesicles, it could be demonstrated that the translocation requires a fluid bilayer. In addition, protein specificity was shown for the translocation process. Although apocytochrome c-lipid interaction causes vesicle aggregation, fusion by lipid mixing could not be detected. Due to the apocytochrome c-lipid interaction also, protein aggregates and oligomers have been formed. These results will be discussed in the light of a model for translocation of a precursor protein across a model membrane. The relevance for the mitochondrial system will also be discussed.     

Protein translocation across membranes.

Cellular membranes act as semipermeable barriers to ions and macromolecules. Specialized mechanisms of transport of proteins across membranes have been developed during evolution. There are common mechanistic themes among protein translocation systems in bacteria and in eukaryotic cells. Here we review current understanding of mechanisms of protein transport across the bacterial plasma membrane as well as across several organelle membranes of yeast and mammalian cells. We consider a variety of organelles including the endoplasmic reticulum, outer and inner membranes of mitochondria, outer, inner, and thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts, peroxisomes, and lysosomes. Several common principles are evident: (a) multiple pathways of protein translocation across membranes exist, (b) molecular chaperones are required in the cytosol, inside the organelle, and often within the organelle membrane, (c) ATP and/or GTP hydrolysis is required, (d) a proton-motive force across the membrane is often required, and (e) protein translocation occurs through gated, aqueous channels. There are exceptions to each of these common principles indicating that our knowledge of how proteins translocate across membranes is not yet complete.     

Possible participation of acid phospholipids in the translocation of secreted proteins through the cytoplasmic membrane of bacteria

The work presents a brief review of data on the interrelation between the biosynthesis and secretion of proteins in bacteria, and between metabolism, composition and physicochemical state of membrane lipids. Based on the analysis of these data in view of the modern ideas of the dynamic character of the membrane lipid structure, a hypothesis concerning the active participation of acid phospholipids in the translocation of protein and phospholipids through the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane is advanced. A new model of the coupled translocation of protein and phospholipids through the membrane is proposed which differs from the previous ones because it accounts not only the role of the secreted protein structure in its translocation through the membrane but assumes an active participation of membranes themselves (specifically phospholipids) in this process. The model assumes the interaction between a signal peptide of the de novo synthesized protein and acid phospholipids of membranes. Such an interaction initiates a transmembrane movement of phospholipids and a coupled translocation of phospholipids and protein, in which phospholipids and proteins secreted favor the movement of each other.     

Protein unfolding--an important process in vivo?

Protein unfolding is an important step in several cellular processes, most interestingly protein degradation by ATP-dependent proteases and protein translocation across some membranes. Unfolding can be catalyzed when the unfoldases change the unfolding pathway of substrate proteins by pulling at their polypeptide chains. The resistance of a protein to unraveling during these processes is not determined by the protein's stability against global unfolding, as measured by temperature or solvent denaturation in vitro. Instead, resistance to unfolding is determined by the local structure that the unfoldase encounters first as it follows the substrate's polypeptide chain from the targeting signal. As unfolding is a necessary step in protein degradation and translocation, the susceptibility to unfolding of substrate proteins contributes to the specificity of these important cellular processes.     

Reconstitution of protein translocation activity from partially solubilized microsomal vesicles

We have used a reconstitution assay to demonstrate that protein translocation activity can be recovered after microsomal vesicles derived from the rough endoplasmic reticulum have been partially solubilized with n-octyl-beta-glucopyranoside. Two independent approaches were used to establish conditions for partially solubilizing microsomal membranes. When the lipid bilayer was disrupted by detergents to the extent that the integrity of the lipid bilayer had been perturbed, membranes were inactive for translocation. However, detergent-treated membranes could be reconstituted in good yield into a translocation competent form once the detergent was removed.     

Regulation of glucose transporter 4 translocation by the Rab guanosine triphosphatase-activating protein AS160/TBC1D4: role of phosphorylation and membrane association

Insulin-stimulated translocation of the glucose transporter GLUT4 to the plasma membrane in muscle and fat cells depends on the phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway. The downstream target AS160/TBC1D4 is phosphorylated upon insulin stimulation and contains a TBC domain (Tre-2/Bub2/Cdc16) that is present in most Rab guanosine triphosphatase-activating proteins. TBC1D4 associates with GLUT4-containing membranes under basal conditions and dissociates from membranes with insulin. Here we show that the association of TBC1D4 with membranes is required for its inhibitory action on GLUT4 translocation under basal conditions. Whereas the insulin-dependent dissociation of TBC1D4 from membranes was not required for GLUT4 translocation, its phosphorylation was essential. Many agonists that stimulate GLUT4 translocation failed to trigger TBC1D4 translocation to the cytosol, but in most cases these agonists stimulated TBC1D4 phosphorylation at T642, and their effects on GLUT4 translocation were inhibited by overexpression of the TBC1D4 phosphorylation mutant (TBC1D4-4P). We postulate that TBC1D4 acts to impede GLUT4 translocation by disarming a Rab protein found on GLUT4-containing-membranes and that phosphorylation of TBC1D4 per se is sufficient to overcome this effect, allowing GLUT4 translocation to the cell surface to proceed.     

Stable association of chloroplastic precursors with protein translocation complexes that contain proteins from both envelope membranes and a stromal Hsp100 molecular chaperone.

Cytoplasmically synthesized precursors interact with translocation components in both the outer and inner envelope membranes during transport into chloroplasts. Using co-immunoprecipitation techniques, with antibodies specific to known translocation components, we identified stable interactions between precursor proteins and their associated membrane translocation components in detergent-solubilized chloroplastic membrane fractions. Antibodies specific to the outer envelope translocation components OEP75 and OEP34, the inner envelope translocation component IEP110 and the stromal Hsp100, ClpC, specifically co-immunoprecipitated precursor proteins under limiting ATP conditions, a stage we have called docking. A portion of these same translocation components was co-immunoprecipitated as a complex, and could also be detected by co-sedimentation through a sucrose density gradient. ClpC was observed only in complexes with those precursors utilizing the general import apparatus, and its interaction with precursor-containing translocation complexes was destabilized by ATP. Finally, ClpC was co-immunoprecipitated with a portion of the translocation components of both outer and inner envelope membranes, even in the absence of added precursors. We discuss possible roles for stromal Hsp100 in protein import and mechanisms of precursor binding in chloroplasts.