Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics

Sampling experiments were performed to investigate mean square error and bias in estimates of mean shape produced by different geometric morphometric methods. The experiments use the isotropic error model, which assumes equal and independent variation at each landmark. The case of three landmarks in the plane (i.e., triangles) was emphasized because it could be investigated systematically and the results displayed on the printed page. The amount of error in the estimates was displayed as RMSE surfaces over the space of all possible configurations of three landmarks. Patterns of bias were shown as vector fields over this same space. Experiments were also performed using particular combinations of four or more landmarks in both two and three dimensions.It was found that the generalized Procrustes analysis method produced estimates with the least error and no pattern of bias. Averages of Bookstein shape coordinates performed well if the longest edge was used as the baseline. The method of moments (Stoyan, 1990, Model. Biomet. J. 32, 843) used in EDMA (Lele, 1993, Math. Geol. 25, 573) exhibits larger errors. When variation is not small, it also shows a pattern of bias for isosceles triangles with one side much shorter than the other two and for triangles whose vertices are approximately collinear causing them to resemble their own reflections. Similar problems were found for the log-distance method of Rao and Suryawanshi (1996, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 95, 4121). These results and their implications for the application of different geometric morphometric methods are discussed.     

MicroRNA regulation masters basal transcription: Clash of the Titans

Comment on: Portal MM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:8686-91.     

The role of eIF5A in protein synthesis

Comment on: Henderson A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:6415-9.     

You’d better catch that Wnt: Primitive hematopoiesis requires canonical Wnt signaling

Comment on: Tran HT, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:16160-5.     

A self-propelled biological process

Comment on : Park JE, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:8200-05.     

AGTR1 as a therapeutic target in ER-positive and ERBB-negative breast cancer cases

Comment on: Rhodes DR, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:10284-9.     

PARP-3, a DNA-dependent PARP with emerging roles in double-strand break repair and mitotic progression

Comment on: Boehler C, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:2783-8.     

Changing pace: Viral mimicry of an anaphase promoting complex subunit

Comment on: Mo M, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19527-32.     

A general requirement for FcγRIIB co-engagement of agonistic anti-TNFR antibodies

Comment on: Li F, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:10966-71.     

Manipulation of single polymerase-DNA complexes: A mechanical view of DNA unwinding during replication

Comment on: Morin JA, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:8115-20.     

Recognizing the cooperative and independent mitochondrial functions of Parkin and PINK1

Comment on: Johnson BN, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:6283-8.     

Do transcription factories and TOP2B provide a recipe for chromosome translocations in therapy-related leukemia?

Comment on: Cowell IG, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:8989-94.     

Finding time: A daily clock in yeast

Comment on: Eelderink-Chen Z, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:2043-7.     

microRNAs gain magnitude in muscle

Comment on: Crist CG, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:13383-7.     

TLS/FUS

Comment on: Tan AY, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:6030-5.     

A long way to stemness

Comment on: Tanaka Y, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:4515-20.     

How a mismatch repair enzyme balances the needs for efficient lesion processing and minimal action on undamaged DNA

Comment on: Maiti A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:8091-6.     

The Myc-ARF-Egr1 pathway

Comment on: Boone DN, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 108:632-7.     

Probing the complexity of miRNA expression across hematopoiesis

Comment on: Petriv OI, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:15443-8.     

The TGFβ-Par6 polarity pathway: Linking the Par complex to EMT and breast cancer progression

Comment on: Viloria-Petit AM, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:14028-33.