Expression of MRF4, a myogenic helix-loop-helix protein, produces multiple changes in the myogenic program of BC3H-1 cells.

Expression of MRF4, a myogenic regulatory factor of the basic helix-loop-helix type, produced multiple changes in the myogenic program of the BC3H-1 cell line. BC3H-1 cells that stably expressed exogenous MRF4 were prepared and termed BR cell lines. Upon differentiation, the BR cells were found to have three muscle-specific properties (endogenous MyoD expression, myoblast fusion, and fast myosin light-chain 1 expression) that the parent BC3H-1 cells did not have. Of the four known myogenic regulatory factors (MyoD, myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4), only MRF4 was capable of activating expression of the endogenous BC3H-1 myoD gene. In addition, the pattern of Myf-5 expression in BR cells was the opposite of that in BC3H-1 cells. Myf-5 expression was low in BR myoblasts and showed a small increase upon myotube formation, whereas Myf-5 expression was high in BC3H-1 myoblasts and decreased upon differentiation. Though the MRF4-transfected BR cells fused to form large myotubes and expressed fast myosin light-chain 1, the pattern of myosin heavy-chain isoform expression was the same in the BR and the nonfusing parent BC3H-1 cells, suggesting that factors in addition to the MyoD family members regulate myosin heavy-chain isoform expression patterns in BC3H-1 cells. In contrast to the changes produced by MRF4 expression, overexpression of Myf-5 did not alter BC3H-1 myogenesis. The results suggest that differential expression of the myogenic regulatory factors of the MyoD family may be one mechanism for generating cells with diverse myogenic phenotypes.     

c-myc inhibition of MyoD and myogenin-initiated myogenic differentiation.

In vertebrate development, a prominent feature of several cell lineages is the coupling of cell cycle regulation with terminal differentiation. We have investigated the basis of this relationship in the skeletal muscle lineage by studying the effects of the proliferation-associated regulator, c-myc, on the differentiation of MyoD-initiated myoblasts. Transient cotransfection assays in NIH 3T3 cells using MyoD and c-myc expression vectors demonstrated c-myc suppression of MyoD-initiated differentiation. A stable cell system was also developed in which MyoD expression was constitutive, while myc levels could be elevated conditionally. Induction of this conditional c-myc suppressed myogenesis effectively, even in the presence of MyoD. c-myc suppression also prevented up-regulation of a relative of MyoD, myogenin, which is normally expressed at the onset of differentiation in all muscle cell lines examined and may be essential for differentiation. Additional experiments tested whether failure to differentiate in the presence of myc could be overcome by providing myogenin ectopically. Cotransfection of c-myc with myogenin, MyoD, or a mixture of myogenin and MyoD showed that neither myogenin alone nor myogenin plus MyoD together could bypass the c-myc block. The effects of c-myc were further dissected by showing that c-myc can inhibit differentiation independently of Id, a negative regulator of muscle differentiation. These results lead us to propose that c-myc and Id constitute independent negative regulators of muscle differentiation, while myogenin and any of the other three related myogenic factors (MyoD, Myf-5, and MRF4/herculin/Myf-6) act as positive regulators.     

Differential expression of myogenic determination genes in muscle cells: possible autoactivation by the Myf gene products.

The development of muscle cells involves the action of myogenic determination factors. In this report, we show that human skeletal muscle tissue contains, besides the previously described Myf-5, two additional factors Myf-3 and Myf-4 which represent the human homologues of the rodent proteins MyoD1 and myogenin. The genes encoding Myf-3, Myf-4 and Myf-5 are located on human chromosomes 11, 1, and 12 respectively. Constitutive expression of a single factor is sufficient to convert mouse C3H 10T1/2 fibroblasts to phenotypically normal muscle cells. The myogenic conversion of 10T1/2 fibroblasts results in the activation of the endogenous MyoD1 and Myf-4 (myogenin) genes. This observation suggests that the expression of Myf proteins leads to positive autoregulation of the members of the Myf gene family. Individual myogenic colonies derived from MCA C115 cells (10T1/2 fibroblast transformed by methylcholanthrene) express various levels of endogenous MyoD1 mRNA ranging from nearly zero to high levels. The Myf-5 gene was generally not activated in 10T1/2 derived myogenic cell lines but was expressed in some MCA myoblasts. In primary human muscle cells Myf-3 and Myf-4 mRNA but very little Myf-5 mRNA is expressed. In mouse C2 and P2 muscle cell lines MyoD1 is abundantly synthesized together with myogenin. In contrast, the rat muscle lines L8 and L6 and the mouse BC3H1 cells express primarily myogenin and low levels of Myf-5 but no MyoD1. Myf-4 (myogenin) mRNA is present in all muscle cell lines at the onset of differentiation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Myf-5 and myoD genes are activated in distinct mesenchymal stem cells and determine different skeletal muscle cell lineages.

Targeted inactivation of the myogenic determination genes myf-5 and myoD in mice resulted in moderate (Myf-5) or no muscle phenotypes (MyoD) and double knock-out mutants lacking both genes failed to develop any skeletal muscle. In order to determine the mechanism of this apparent genetic redundancy we investigated the basis of functional overlap between the two genes. Here we demonstrate that Myf-5 and MyoD are not expressed within the same muscle precursor cell, but rather determine different muscle cell lineages arising from independently committed stem cell populations. Selective ablation of Myf-5-expressing muscle precursors from differentiating ES cells does not prevent Myo-D-dependent muscle differentiation. The early muscle progenitor cells which normally express Myf-5 do not develop into later appearing MyoD cells, even when the myf-5 gene has been inactivated. Thus skeletal musculature in vertebrates develops from two separate cell lineages and complementation may occur at the cellular level, but not between different myogenic factor genes within one cell.     

The MyoD family of transcription factors and skeletal myogenesis

Gene targeting has allowed the dissection of complex biological processes at the genetic level. Our understanding of the nuances of skeletal muscle development has been greatly increased by the analysis of mice carrying targeted null mutations in the Myf-5, MyoD and myogenin genes, encoding members of the myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) family. These experiments have elucidated the hierarchical relationships existing between the MRFs, and established that functional redundancy is a feature of the MRF regulatory network. Either MyoD or Myf-5 is sufficient for the formation or survival of skeletal myoblasts. Myogenin acts later in development and plays an essential in vivo role in the terminal differentiation of myotubes.     

Differential binding of quadruplex structures of muscle-specific genes regulatory sequences by MyoD, MRF4 and myogenin

Four myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs); MyoD, Myf-5, MRF4 and Myogenin direct muscle tissue differentiation. Heterodimers of MRFs with E-proteins activate muscle-specific gene expression by binding to E-box motifs d(CANNTG) in their promoters or enhancers. We showed previously that in contrast to the favored binding of E-box by MyoD-E47 heterodimers, homodimeric MyoD associated preferentially with quadruplex structures of regulatory sequences of muscle-specific genes. To inquire whether other MRFs shared the DNA binding preferences of MyoD, the DNA affinities of hetero- and homo-dimeric MyoD, MRF4 and Myogenin were compared. Similarly to MyoD, heterodimers with E47 of MRF4 or Myogenin bound E-box more tightly than quadruplex DNA. However, unlike homodimeric MyoD or MRF4, Myogenin homodimers associated weakly and nonpreferentially with quadruplex DNA. By reciprocally switching basic regions between MyoD and Myogenin we demonstrated dominance of MyoD in determining the quadruplex DNA-binding affinity. Thus, Myogenin with an implanted MyoD basic region bound quadruplex DNA nearly as tightly as MyoD. However, a grafted Myogenin basic region did not diminish the high affinity of homodimeric MyoD for quadruplex DNA. We speculate that the dissimilar interaction of MyoD and Myogenin with tetrahelical domains in muscle gene promoters may differently regulate their myogenic activities.     

Conditional conversion of ES cells to skeletal muscle by an exogenous MyoD1 gene.

A variety of differentiated cell types can be converted to skeletal muscle cells following transfection with the myogenic regulatory gene MyoD1. To determine whether multipotent embryonic stem (ES) cells respond similarly, cultures of two ES cell lines were electroporated with a MyoD1 cDNA driven by the beta-actin promoter. All transfected clones, carrying a single copy of the exogenous gene, expressed high levels of MyoD1 mRNA. Surprisingly, although maintained in mitogen-rich medium, this ectopic expression was associated with a transactivation of the endogenous myogenin and myosin light chain 2 gene but not the endogenous MyoD1, MRF4, Myf5, the skeletal muscle actin, or the myosin heavy chain genes. Preferential myogenesis and the appearance of contracting skeletal muscle fibers were observed only when the transfected cells were allowed to differentiate in vitro, via embryoid bodies, in low-mitogen-containing medium. Myogenesis was associated with the activation of MRF4 and Myf5 genes and resulted in a significant increase in the level of myogenin mRNA. Not all cells were converted to skeletal muscle cells, indicating that only a subset of stem cells can respond to MyoD1. Moreover, the continued expression of the introduced gene was not required for myogenesis. These results show that ES cells can respond to MyoD1, but environmental factors control the expression of its myogenic differentiation function, that MyoD1 functions in ES cells even under environmental conditions that favor differentiation is not dominant (incomplete penetrance), that MyoD1 expression is required for the establishment of the myogenic program but not for its maintenance, and that the exogenous MyoD1 gene can trans-activate the endogenous myogenin and MLC2 genes in undifferentiated ES cells.     

Ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation, intracellular localization, and protein synthesis of MyoD and Id1 during muscle differentiation

Mammalian skeletal myogenesis results in the differentiation of myoblasts to mature syncytial myotubes, a process regulated by an intricate genetic network of at least three protein families: muscle regulatory factors, E proteins, and Id proteins. MyoD, a key muscle regulatory factor, and its negative regulator Id1 have both been shown to be degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Using C2C12 cells and confocal fluorescence microscopy, we showed that MyoD and Id1 co-localize within the nucleus in proliferating myoblasts. In mature myotubes, in contrast, they reside in distinctive subcellular compartments, with MyoD within the nucleus and Id1 exclusively in the cytoplasm. Cellular abundance of Id1 was markedly diminished from the very onset of muscle differentiation, whereas MyoD abundance was reduced to a much lesser extent and only at the later stages of differentiation. These reductions in MyoD and Id1 protein levels seem to result from a change in the rate of protein synthesis rather than the rate of degradation. In vivo protein stability studies revealed that the rates of ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated MyoD and Id1 degradation are independent of myogenic differentiation state. Id1 and MyoD were both rapidly degraded, each with a t 1/2 approximately = 1 h in myoblasts and in myotubes. Furthermore, relative protein synthesis rates for MyoD and Id1 were significantly diminished during myoblast to myotube differentiation. These results provide insight as to the interaction between MyoD and Id1 in the process of muscle differentiation and have implications for the involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated protein degradation and protein synthesis in muscle differentiation and metabolism under abnormal and pathological conditions.