Transmission of rayado fino virus of maize (Zea mays) by Dalbulus tnaidis

Rayado fino virus (RFV) of maize (Zea mays) was transmitted by the leaf-hopper Dalbulus maidis in a manner characteristic of viruses that multiply in their insect vectors. Individual insects fed on infected plants transmitted the virus after incubation periods of 8–22 days; males had shorter incubation periods than females but died sooner. Insects retained infectivity for 1–20 days. Transmission by most insects was intermittent. Inoculativity by D. maidis decreased with time, but the virus was recovered from insects that had lost their ability to transmit. Extracts of plants infected with RFV and viruliferous insects were injected into healthy insects, which became viruli-ferous. Infectivity of the extracts was not affected by tetracycline hydrochloride (Achromycin). D. maidis was able to transmit simultaneously RFV and the corn stunt agent. Other than maize, Teosinte (Euchlaena mexicana) was the only plant susceptible to the virus, among a number of species of Gramineae tested.     

Acquisition and transmission of corn stunt spiroplasma by its leafhopper vector Dalbulus maidis

As the acquisition access period of Dalbulus maidis on infected maize increased from 15 min to 7 days, the incubation period of corn stunt spiroplasma (CSS) in the insect decreased from 27 days to 8 days and the final proportion of transmitting insects increased from 5% to 100%. After 7 days access the median incubation period (IPsO) was 14.3 days (IP₅₀ females = 12.9 days: IP₅₀ males =16.8 days), while the proportion of transmitting insects increased from 4. 3% (9 days after the start of acquisition access) to a maximum of 93% (after 22 days), before decreasing. Females started transmitting significantly earlier and a greater proportion transmitted each day than males, until day 22 when both sexes transmitted equally. Of the insects which transmitted CSS, 29% did so continuously until death; 66% failed to transmit during the last 1–3 days, and 5% transmitted intermittently towards the end of their life. During daily transfer, females were more likely to infect plants consecutively (up to 25) than males, and females infected the higher proportion of test plants. As the transmission access period was increased from 1 h to 72 h, the proportion of transmitting insects increased from 22.5% to 97.3% and the incubation period in maize decreased.     

Relations of carrot red leaf and carrot mottle viruses with their aphid vector, Cavariella aegopodii

Studies with Scottish isolates of carrot red leaf (CRLV) and carrot mottle (CMotV) viruses confirmed the dependency of CMotV on CRLV for transmission by the aphid Cavariella aegopodii. CMotV was transmitted by aphids only when the two viruses were present in the same source plant, and its transmission was not assisted by anthriscus yellows virus, which acts as a helper for parsnip yellow fleck virus. Some test plants became infected with CRLV alone, and a few with CMotV alone. In winter, aphid transmission of CRLV and CMotV was greatly increased when the source plants received supplementary lighting whereas the CMotV infectivity of sap was not increased. C. aegopodii acquired CRLV and CMotV after minimum acquisition access times of 30 min and inoculated them after minimum inoculation access times of 2 min. There was a minimum latent period of 7–18 h. The viruses were retained by the aphid after moulting and are therefore circulative in the vector, but were not transmitted to progeny insects. Aphids allowed 24 h to acquire the viruses continued to transmit them for at least 12 days, but some aphids allowed 6 h or less for virus acquisition ceased to transmit after 3 or 4 days. CRLV is considered a tentative member of the luteovirus group.     

Aphid-injection experiments with carrot mottle virus and its helper virus, carrot red leaf

Carrot mottle virus (CMotV) and its helper virus, carrot red leaf (CRLV), were not transmitted by aphids (Cavariella aegopodii) that had fed through membranes on, or had been injected with, sap from mixedly infected chervil plants or partially purified preparations of CMotV. However, the viruses were transmitted by recipient aphids injected with haemolymph from donor aphids that had fed on mixedly infected plants but not by a second series of recipients injected with haemolymph from the first series. Some of the first series of recipients transmitted both viruses for up to 11 days but others transmitted erratically and many lost ability to transmit after a few days. The results confirm that both viruses are circulative but provide no evidence for multiplication in the vector. Non-viruliferous aphids, or aphids that had acquired CRLV by feeding, did not transmit CMotV when they were injected with haemolymph from aphids that had fed on a source of CMotV alone, confirming that they can only transmit CMotV when they acquire it from a mixedly infected plant. When extracts from donor aphids were treated with ether before injection, recipient aphids transmitted both CRLV and CMotV, although the infectivity of CMotV grown in Nicotiana clevelandii in the absence of CRLV is destroyed by ether treatment. CMotV particles acquired by aphids from mixedly infected plants therefore differed in some way from those in singly infected plants. A plausible explanation of these results, and of the dependence of CMotV on CRLV for aphid transmission, is that doubly infected plants contain some particles that consist of CMotV nucleic acid coated with CRLV protein.     

Comparative transmission of bean leaf roll and pea enation mosaic viruses by aphids

Acyrthosiphon pisum was a more efficient vector than Myzus persicae of bean leaf roll virus (BLRV), but the two species transmitted pea enation mosaic virus (PEMV) equally well and much more often than Megoura viciae. M. viciae did not transmit BLRV, and Aphis fabae did not transmit BLRV or PEMV. BLRV and PEMV were transmitted more often by nymphs of A. pisum than by adult apterae or alatae that fed on infected plants only as adults, but both viruses were readily transmitted by adults that had developed on infected plants. The shortest time in which nymphs acquired BLRV was 2 h, and 50 % transmitted after an acquisition period of 4 days. Some nymphs acquired PEMV in 30 min and 50% in 8 h. The shortest time for inoculation of BLRV by adults was 15 min, but some transmitted PEMV in probes lasting less than 1 min. The median latent periods of BLRV and PEMV in aphids fed for 12 h on infected plants were, respectively, 105 and 44 h. Clones of A. pisum differed in their ability to transmit BLRV and PEMV, and efficiency in transmitting the two viruses seemed to be unrelated. Some aphids that fed successively on plants infected with each virus transmitted both viruses, and infectivity with one virus did not seem to affect transmission of the other.     

Further studies on a British form of pea early-browning virus

An isolate of pea early-browning virus from Britain (PEBV (B)) has tubular particles most of which are either about 103 or 212 mμ long with sedimentation coefficients of 210 and 286 S respectively. Both types show cross-banding at intervals of 2.5 mμ. Virus preparations containing only the shorter particles were not infective. PEBV (B) was transmitted to pea seedlings by both adult and juvenile Trichodorus primitivus (de Man) (Nematoda) and persisted for 32 days in T. primitivus kept without plants. In two experiments T. primitivus failed to transmit a Dutch isolate (PEBV (D)), which is distantly related serologically to PEBV (B). PEBV (B) was transmitted by nematodes to cucumber roots more readily in soil at 20d? than at 24d? C., and more readily at 24d? than at 29d? C. When transmitted by inoculation of sap, PEBV (B) and PEBV (D) caused similar symptoms in some pea varieties but differed in virulence towards others. Thirty-one varieties resistant to natural infection with PEBV in The Netherlands were susceptible to PEBV (B) when manually inoculated with sap or when grown in naturally infested soil from one site; twenty-six of these varieties did not become infected in soil from a second site, in which several other varieties that are susceptible in The Netherlands were infected. Varieties should therefore be tested for resistance by growing them on many infested fields. All but one of the pea varieties resistant to PEBV in The Netherlands became infected with the English form of tomato black ring virus when grown in soil containing infective Longidorus attenuatus Hooper.     

Maize rough dwarf virus (Reoviridae) in its planthopper vector Laodelphax striatellus in relation to vector infectivity

The infectivity of females of the planthopper vector Laodelphax striatellus given access to maize rough dwarf virus (MRDV) infected plants was assessed for up to 55 days from the end of the access period. A 3-day inoculation access period was used, and this avoided intermittent transmission. Maximum infectivity was reached c. 30 days after acquisition access and the proportion of transmitter insects then remained constant. There was no difference in the efficiency of female L. striatellus in acquiring MRDV as third instar nymphs or as adults when compared in transmission tests 24, 30, 35 and 40 days after access to the virus. ELISA tests for MRDV subviral particles (SVPs) discriminated between individual viruliferous and non-viruliferous insects from the 30th day after access. Of the viruliferous (ELISA positive) insects about 30% did not transmit MRDV and the proportion remained similar from 30 to 55 days after access. None of the non-transmitter insects tested in serial transfer transmission tests was positive in ELISA. The concentration of SVPs detected by ELISA in the transmitter hoppers continued to increase exponentially, even after maximum infectivity was reached.     

Biological characteristics of grass geminiviruses from eastern Australia

Two serotypes of chloris striate mosaic virus (CSMV), paspalum striate mosaic virus (PSMV) and geminiviruses infecting Bromus catharticus and Digitaria didactyla were investigated. Their field occurrence and experimental hosts are listed. Serial transmission data for CSMV by single Nesoclutha pallida show a minimum latent period of 12–14 h, and regular transmission with occasional breaks for up to 50 days. Cicadulina bimaculata did not transmit any isolates after plant feeding acquisition, but transmitted CSMV inefficiently after insect injection. The vector of PSMV was found to be a specific biotype of N. pallida which bred only on Paspalum spp. The rate of transmission of CSMV with the Chloris biotype of N. pallida and of PSMV with the Paspalum biotype reached c. 50% with single insects, but only when freshly-infected source plants were used. Geminate particles were found in thin sections of leaf tissue infected with all four viruses, and partially purified preparations were made of three of these. In gel diffusion tests, the virus from Microlaena stipoides produced a spur reaction with CSMV, when reacted with CSMV antiserum. The B. catharticus and D. didactyla isolates failed to react serologically with CSMV, maize streak or Vanuatu digitaria streak viruses.     

New insights in phytoplasma‐vector interaction: acquisition and inoculation of flavescence dorée phytoplasma by Scaphoideus titanus adults in a short window of time

The leafhopper Scaphoideus titanus is able to transmit 16SrV phytoplasmas agents of grapevine's flavescence dorée (FD) within 30–45 days, following an acquisition access period (AAP) of a few days feeding on infected plants as a nymph, a latency period (LP) of 3–5 weeks becoming meanwhile an adult, and an inoculation access period (IAP) of a few days on healthy plants. However, several aspects of FD epidemiology suggest how the whole transmission process may take less time, and may start directly with adults of the insect vector. Transmission experiments have been set up under lab condition. Phytoplasma‐free S. titanus adults were placed on broad bean (BB) plants (Vicia faba) infected by FD‐C (16SrV‐C) phytoplasmas for an AAP = 7 days. Afterwards, they were immediately moved onto healthy BB for IAP, which were changed every 7 days, obtaining three timings of inoculation: IAP 1, IAP 2 and IAP 3, lasting 7, 14 and 21 days from the end of AAP, respectively. DNA was extracted from plants and insects, and PCR tests were performed to identify FD phytoplasmas. Insects were dissected and fluorescence in situ hybridisation was made to detect the presence of phytoplasmas in midguts and salivary glands. The rate of infection in insects ranged 46–68% without significant differences among IAPs. Inoculation in plants succeeded in all IAPs, at a rate of 16–23% (no significant differences). Phytoplasma load was significantly higher in IAP 3 than IAP 1–2 for both plants and insects. Phytoplasmas were identified both in midgut and salivary glands of S. titanus at all IAP times. The possible implications of these results in the epidemiology of flavescence dorée are discussed.     

Purification and Properties of the Geminivirus Euphorbia Mosaic Virus

Euphorbia mosaic virus was purified from infected plants of Nicotiana benthamiana. Highest concentrations of virus particles were found in infected plant tissue between 10–12 days after inoculation. The enzyme driselase assisted in purification of the virus particles from the infected tissue yielding about 600 μg/kg of plant material. Purified preparations showed a maximum absorption at 260–263 nm and the ratio of absorption at 260 and 280 nm was 1.4. The viral nucleic acid was digestedby DNase I and S₁ Nuclease but not RNase A. A single coat protein with a MW of 32,000 d and two DNA bands with a MW 0.96 × 10⁶ d (2870 nucleotides) and 0.90 × 10⁶ d (2700 nucleotides) were associated with the purified virus particles. Virus specific DNA was isolated from infected tissue between 7 and 15 days after inoculations.     

THE TRANSMISSION OF PLANT VIRUSES BY BITING INSECTS, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO COWPEA MOSAIC

Experiments on the virus-vector relationship of the Trinidad cowpea mosaic virus, transmitted by Ceratoma ruficornis , gave the following results: ability to infect decreased with increasing time after ceasing to feed on infected plants, but vectors remained infective for 14 days (much longer than the longevity in vitro of the virus at glasshouse shade temperatures of 23–31°C.); the beetles transmitted more consistently after longer feeding on infected plants, though feeds of under 5 min. made them efficient vectors; the proportion of plants infected increased with the amount of feeding damage on them; fasting the vectors before feeding on infected plants increased voracity but had no effect on their ability to transmit; beetles became infective immediately after feeding on infected plants. Cowpeas were infected by inoculation with macerated infective vectors or with juice regurgitated by vectors. There is no evidence that aphids or other sucking insects can transmit the virus. It seems similar to squash mosaic and turnip yellow mosaic, for vectors of all three viruses probably transmit by regurgitating infective juice during feeding.     

Factors affecting aphid acquisition and transmission of soybean mosaic virus

Myzus persicae transmitted soybean mosaic virus (SMV) most efficiently following 30 or 60 s acquisition probes on infected plants. There were no differences in susceptibility to SMV infection of soybean plants 1 to 12 wk old, but symptoms were more severe in plants inoculated when young than when old. Soybeans inoculated between developmental stages R3 and R6 only showed yellowish-brown blotching on one or more leaves. There were no observable differences in the time of appearance or type of symptoms shown by soybean seedlings inoculated either by sap or by aphids; infected plants became acquisition hosts for aphids 5–6 days after inoculation. There was no change in the efficiency with which M. persicae transmitted SMV from source plants up to 18 wk after inoculation. M. persicae transmitted SMV from leaves of field-grown soybeans when plants were inoculated at developmental stages V6, R2, and R3 and tested as sources 57–74 days after inoculation but not from plants inoculated at R5 and tested as sources 14 to 32 days after inoculation. M. persicae acquired SMV from soybean buds, flowers, green bean pods, and unifoliolate, trifoliolate, and senescent leaves. Middle-aged and deformed leaves were better sources of the virus than buds, unfolding and old symptomless leaves. The results are being incorporated into a computer model of SMV epidemiology.     

Insect vectors of cowpea mosaic virus in Nigeria

A yellow strain of cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) was transmitted in cowpea by two thrips, Sericothrips occipitalis and Taeniothrips sjostedti; two chrysomelid beetles, Ootheca mutabilis and Paraluperodes quaternus; a curculionid beetle, Nematocerus acerbus; and two acridid grasshoppers, Catantops spissus spissus and Zonocerus variegatus. Summarizing trials with single insects, the efficiency of transmission of CPMV averaged 18—21% for N. acerbus and the two grasshoppers, 55% for P. quaternus, and 71% for O. mutabilis. Twenty-two and 40% of the plants exposed to large populations of S. occipitalis and T. sjostedti, respectively, were infected. In three trials with an aphid, Aphis craccivora, 4 of 49 plants were infected with CPMV, but these infections were considered spurious because no infections occurred in any of 63 plants exposed to this insect in four other trials. A coreid bug, Riptortus dentipes, did not transmit CPMV. Mosaic symptoms in infected plants appeared 5—39 days after they were exposed to vectors. Infective virus was recovered from fresh faecal pellets of each grasshopper vector.     

Transmission of broad bean stain virus and Echtes Ackerbohnenmosaik-Virus to field beans (Viciajaba) by weevils

Sitona lineatus and Apion vorax were the two most common species of weevil on field beans (Vicia faba minor) at Rothamsted between 1970 and 1974. In glasshouse tests, A. vorax was a much more efficient vector than 5. lineatus of broad bean stain virus (BBSV) and Echtes Ackerbohnenmosaik-Virus (EAMV), and both species transmitted EAMV more often than BBSV. Five other species of Apion transmitted the viruses infrequently or not at all. S. lineatus adults transmitted no more often after 8–16 days on infected plants than after 1–2 days. Some A. vorax adults transmitted EAMV, but not BBSV, after feeding on infected leaves for a few minutes. After 4 days on infected plants, A. vorax sometimes remained infective for the following 8 days. No A. vorax collected from woodland plants in spring was infective with BBSV or EAMV, but 4% from bean crops containing seed-borne infection carried BBSV and 17% carried EAMV. BBSV and EAMV were recovered from triturated weevils, but not from weevil haemolymph. Possibly the viruses are transmitted as contaminants of the mouthparts or by regurgitation during feeding, but A. vorax was observed to regurgitate only when anaesthetized. BBSV and EAMV were not transmitted by aphids (Aphis fabae and Acyrthosiphon pisum), nor by pollen beetles {Meligethes spp.). Field observations suggest that infected seed is the main source of BBSV and EAMV in spring-sown crops, and that crops grown from virus-free seed, and isolated from infected crops by 250–500 m, remain free of infection for most of the season.     

Leafhopper transmission of Rhynchosia little leaf, a disease associated with mycoplasma-like organisms in Jamaica

Little leaf disease of Rhynchosia minima (RLL) in Jamaica is reported for the first time. The presence of phloem-restricted MLO in diseased but not healthy plants, the remission of symptoms induced in RLL-affected plants with soil drenches of tetracycline, but not penicillin, and the transmission of disease-associated MLO to R. minima test plants, suggests that RLL has an MLO aetiology. RLL is vectored by the cicadellid leafhopper Ollarianus balli, for which R. minima represents the specific field host. Healthy colonies of O. balli produced from eggs oviposited on the RLL-immune weed Asystasia gangetica suggest that RLL is not transovarially transmitted. O. balli acquired the RLL agent after access to infected plants for 5 days (shorter feeds were not tried), and there was a maximum latent period in the leafhopper of 21 days. Of the O. balli collected from heavily-infected field stands of RLL, 35% transmitted the disease, while, of those reared on RLL in captivity for 14–16 days, 56% transmitted. Male and female O. balli transmitted equally efficiently, while nymphs were less frequent vectors. O. balli also infected Cajanus cajan, an important small scale subsistence crop in Jamaica, and Catharanthus roseus. It did not, however, transmit coconut lethal yellowing (CLY) disease to test palms after natural or deliberate acquisition-feeding on RLL, acquisition-feeding on CLY-affected palms, or, after injection with CLY-affected phloem exudate. There was thus no evidence that RLL is related to CLY or that O. balli can act as a vector of CLY.     

The transmission of strawberry latent ringspot virus by Xiphinema diversicaudatutn (Nematoda)

Strawberry latent ringspot virus (SLRV) was found in diseased rose bushes growing in a glasshouse where the soil contained Xiphinema diversicaudatum (Micol). Adult female, adult male and juvenile X. diversicaudatum all transmitted the virus to cucumber seedlings, and nematodes kept without plants for 32 days after acquiring SLRV later transmitted it. When transferred to fresh plants every 2–4 days for 3 weeks, single nematodes transmitted up to three times; one nematode did not transmit until 19 days after the transfers began. One adult X. diversicaudatum, out of 141 tested, transmitted both SLRV and arabis mosaic virus. In all respects X. diversicaudatum behaved as a vector of SLRV as it does as a vector of arabis mosaic virus.     

Cucumber Vein Yellowing Virus; Host Range and Virus Vector Relationships

Cucumber vein yellowing virus (CVYV) is transmitted by Bemisia tabaci, it has a narrow host range restricted to some cucurbitaceous plants including Cucumis sativus, C. melo, C. melo var. flexousus, Cucurbita pepo, C. foesti, Citrullus vulgaris, C. colocynthis and Lagenaria siceraria. Although a single whitefly can transmit the disease, the efficiency of transmission was low. At least 15–20 insects per plant were required to cause an infection of 55 % of inoculated plants. The minimum acquisition and inoculation feeding periods were 30 and 15 min, respectively. The latent period in the vector is about 75 min and the whitefly was infectious for not more than 5 h.     

Settling preferences of the whitefly vector Bemisia tabaci on infected plants varies with virus family and transmission mode

Virus infection may change not only the host‐plant phenotypic (morphological and physiological) characteristics, but can also modify the behavior of their insect vector in a mutualistic or rather antagonistic manner, to promote their spread to new hosts. Viruses differ in their modes of transmission and depend on vector behavior for successful spread. Here, we investigated the effects of the semi‐persistently transmitted Tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV, Crinivirus) and the persistent circulative Tomato severe rugose virus (ToSRV, Begomovirus) on alighting preferences and arrestment behavior of their whitefly vector Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Middle East Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) on tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Santa Clara, Solanaceae). The vector alighting preferences between infected and uninfected plants in choice assays were apparently influenced by the presence of ToCV and ToSRV in the whiteflies or by their previous exposure to infected plants. The observed changes in vector behavior do not seem to benefit the spread of ToCV: non‐viruliferous insects clearly preferred mock‐inoculated plants, whereas ToCV‐viruliferous insects landed on mock‐inoculated and ToCV‐infected plants, indicating a partial change in insect behavior – ToCV was able to directly affect the preference of its vector B. tabaci, but this change in insect behavior did not affect the virus spread because viruliferous insects landed on mock‐inoculated and infected plants indistinctly. In contrast, ToSRV‐viruliferous insects preferred to land on mock‐inoculated plants, a behavior that increases the probability of spread to new host plants. In the arresting behavior assay, the majority of the insects remained on mock‐inoculated plants when released on them. A greater number of insects moved toward mock‐inoculated plants when initially released on ToCV‐ or ToSRV‐infected plants, suggesting that these viruses may repel or reduce the nutritional quality of the host plants for B. tabaci MEAM1.     

Transmission characteristics and some other properties of bean yellow vein-banding virus, and its association with pea enation

Bean yellow vein-banding virus (BYVBV) has been found occasionally in mixed infection with pea enation mosaic virus (PEMV) in spring-sown field beans (Vicia faba minor) in southern England. Glasshouse tests confirmed that, like PEMV, BYVBV is transmissible by manual inoculation and by aphids in the persistent manner. However, BYVBV can be transmitted by aphids only from plants that are also infected with a helper virus, usually PEMV. Thus after separation from PEMV by passage through Phaseolus vulgaris it was no longer aphid-transmissible. It became aphid-transmissible again only after re-mixing in plants with PEMV or with a substitute helper, bean leaf roll virus (BLRV). It was not transmitted by aphids that fed sequentially on plants singly infected with PEMV and BYVBV. Thus the interaction between BYVBV and PEMV (or BLRV) that enables BYVBV to be transmitted by aphids seems to occur only in doubly infected plants. However, it was not transmitted by aphids from plants doubly infected with BYVBV and broad bean wilt virus (BBWV). BYVBV and PEMV were transmitted more readily by Acyrthosiphon pisum than by Myzus persicae; neither virus was transmitted by Aphis fabae. Phenol extracts of BYVBV-infected leaves were more infective than phosphate buffer or bentonite-clarified extracts and were sometimes infective when diluted to 1/1000. The infectivity of BYVBV in phosphate buffer extracts of leaves singly infected with BYVBV, unlike that in extracts of leaves doubly infected with BYVBV and PEMV (or BLRV), was destroyed by treatment with organic solvents. BYVBV infected 11 of 28 plant species that were inoculated with phenol extracts; seven of the infected species were legumes. No transmission of BYVBV was detected through seed harvested from infected field bean plants. Isometric particles c. 30 nm in diameter were seen in extracts of plants doubly infected with BYVBV and PEMV but not in extracts of plants infected with BYVBV alone. Leaves of plants infected with BYVBV, alone or with PEMV, contained membrane-bound structures c. 50–90 nm in diameter associated with the tonoplast in cell vacuoles. These structures were not found in healthy leaves. BYVBV has several properties in common with other known aphid-borne viruses that are helper-dependent and transmitted in a persistent manner. Possibly, as suggested for some of them, aphid transmission of BYVBV depends on the coating of its nucleic acid with helper virus coat protein.