Colesevelam Hydrochloride Added to Background Metformin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis from 3 Clinical Studies

ObjectiveTo evaluate the glucose- and lipid-altering efficacy of colesevelam hydrochloride (HCl) when added to background metformin therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsThis post hoc analysis included patients with T2DM from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled pivotal studies who received metformin as part of their background antidiabetes therapy. In the pivotal studies, patients with T2DM were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam HCl (3.75 g/d) or placebo added to existing metformin (26 weeks), sulfonylurea (26 weeks), or insulin (16 weeks) monotherapy or combination therapy, wherein the combination therapies may have included metformin.ResultsIn this pooled analysis of 696 patients with T2DM who were receiving metformin monotherapy or metformin combined with other antidiabetes therapies, 355 were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam HCl and 341 to receive placebo. In comparison with placebo, colesevelam HCl significantly reduced hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (mean treatment difference: -0.50% and -15.7 mg/dL, respectively; P < .001 for both), as well as significantly reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; mean treatment difference: -16.5%), total cholesterol (TC; -5.8%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C; -8.2%), and apolipoprotein (apo) B (-7.6%) (P < .0001 for all). Median triglyceride levels were increased with colesevelam HCl (median treatment difference: + 12.8%; P < .0001). In comparison with placebo, colesevelam HCl significantly increased apo A-I (mean treatment difference: + 3.3%; P < .0001), whereas the mean increase in HDL-C with colesevelam HCl was not significant. Colesevelam HCl therapy was generally well tolerated.ConclusionWhen added to metformin-including therapy, colesevelam HCl significantly reduced A1C and fasting glucose, as well as levels of LDL-C, TC, non- HDL-C, and apo B in patients with inadequately controlled T2DM. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:933-938)     

Initial Combination Therapy with Metformin and Colesevelam for Achievement of Glycemic and Lipid Goals Min Early Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with metformin plus colesevelam in patients with early type 2 diabetes.MethodsIn this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adults with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [A1C] values of 6.5% to 10.0%) and hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] levels ≥ 100 mg/dL) were randomly assigned (1:1) to colesevelam (3.75 g/d) or placebo in combination with open-label metformin (850 mg/d; uptitrated at week 2 to 1, 700 mg/d). The primary efficacy evaluation was change in A1C from baseline to study end (week 16 with last observation carried forward).ResultsIn total, 286 patients were randomized: metformin/colesevelam (n = 145) or metformin/placebo (n = 141). Mean A1C was reduced by 1.1% with metformin/ colesevelam (from 7.8% at baseline to 6.6% at study end) and by 0.8% with metformin/placebo (from 7.5% to 6.7%), resulting in a treatment difference of -0.3% at study end (P = .0035). In addition, metformin/colesevelam significantly reduced LDL-C (-16.3%), total cholesterol (-6.1%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-8.3%), apolipoprotein B (-8.0%), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (-17%) and increased apolipoprotein A-I (+ 4.4%) and triglycerides (+ 18.6%) versus metformin/placebo (P < .01 for all). The proportions of patients who achieved recommended goals with metformin/colesevelam versus metformin/placebo, respectively, were as follows: A1C < 7.0% (67% versus 56% [P = .0092]), LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (48% versus 18% [P < .0001]), and composite A1C < 7.0% + LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (40% versus 12% [P < .0001]). Safety and tolerability were similar between the treatment groups.ConclusionMetformin plus colesevelam may be a valid option for initial therapy to achieve glycemic and lipid goals safely in early type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:629-640)     

Glycemic Control and Diabetic Dyslipidemia in Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveThe incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing at an alarming rate, especially in ethnic minorities, and T2DM is associated with significant comorbidities. The primary objective of this study was to assess glycemic control and cardiovascular risk outcomes in children with T2DM at 1 year after diagnosis. We also assessed whether insulin treatment at onset of diabetes is beneficial for overall outcome in those with elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C).MethodsA retrospective electronic chart review of non-Hispanic white (NHW) and African American (AA) children with T2DM.ResultsA total of 86 patients (66.3% females, 79.1% AA, mean age, 13.8 ± 2.4 years) with T2DM were included. Analyses of therapeutic outcome measures at the 1-year follow-up showed HbA1C <8% in 27.7% of patients, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >130 mg/dL in 12.5%, non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) >160 mg/dL in 15.6%, HDL-C <35 mg/dL in 25%, systolic hypertension (HTN) in 35.6%, and diastolic HTN in 6.8% of subjects. Among those started on insulin at initial diagnosis, there was significant improvement in glycemic outcomes (P<.0001 on insulin vs. P = .02 not on insulin) and dyslipidemia (total cholesterol [TC] [P = .001], LDL-C [P = .02], HDL-C [P = .01], non-HDL-C [P = .0002], and TC/HDL-C [P = .005]) compared with no significant change among those who did not receive insulin at diagnosis.ConclusionSubstantial numbers of children with T2DM do not achieve glycemic and cardiovascular therapeutic goals 1 year after diagnosis. Insulin therapy at diagnosis has significant beneficial effects on diabetic dyslipidemia in those with higher HbA1C. (Endocr Pract. 2013; 19:972-979)     

Colesevelam Hydrochloride to Treat Hypercholesterolemia and Improve Glycemia in Prediabetes: A Randomized,Prospective Study

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of the bile acid sequestrant colesevelam hydrochloride in patients with hypercholesterolemia and prediabetes.MethodsIn this 16-week, randomized, double-blind study, adults with untreated prediabetes (2-hour postoral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] glucose ≥ 140 to 199 mg/dL, fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≥ 110 to 125 mg/ dL, or both), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL, and triglycerides < 500 mg/dL were randomly assigned to receive colesevelam (3.75 g/d) or placebo. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 16 with last observation carried forward. Secondary end points included change in FPG, hemoglobin A1c (A1C), and 2-hour post-OGTT glucose level from baseline to week 16 and attainment of LDL-C and FPG targets.ResultsIn total, 216 patients were randomized (colesevelam, 108; placebo, 108). In comparison with placebo, colesevelam significantly reduced LDL-C (mean treatment difference, -15.6%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.1%), total cholesterol (-7.2%), apolipoprotein B (-8.1%) (P < .001 for all the foregoing), FPG (median, -2.0 mg/dL; P = .02), and A1C (mean, -0.10%; P = .02). Colesevelam did not significantly change 2-hour post-OGTT glucose (-1.9 mg/dL; P = .75) or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.5%; P = .80). In addition, colesevelam significantly increased triglyceride levels relative to placebo (median, 14.3%; P < .001). The proportion of patients achieving target levels with colesevelam versus placebo, respectively, was as follows: LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (29% versus 11%; P < .001), A1C < 6.0% (37% versus 25%; P = .05), FPG < 110 mg/dL (48% versus 56%; P = .97), and normalization of glucose (FPG < 100 mg/dL [40% versus 23%; P = .06]). Colesevelam had a weight-neutral effect and was well tolerated.ConclusionColesevelam is an option for managing the lipid profile and normalizing glucose levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and prediabetes. Further study is warranted to determine whether colesevelam slows or prevents progression of prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:617-628)     

Effects of Colesevelam,Rosiglitazone, or Sitagliptin on Glycemic Control and Lipid Profile in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Metformin Monotherapy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the glycemic effect of colesevelam, rosiglitazone, or sitagliptin when added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and to examine the effects of these antidiabetes agents on lipid and lipoprotein levels.MethodsThis 16-week, open-label pilot study conducted between May 2007 and April 2008 at 20 sites in the United States, 7 sites in Mexico, and 6 sites in Colombia, enrolled adults with inadequately controlled type 2 DM (glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c], 7.0%-10.0%) on a stable metformin regimen (1500-2550 mg daily for ≥ 3 months). At Week 0, participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to open-label colesevelam hydrochloride, 3.75 g daily; openlabel rosiglitazone maleate, 4 mg daily; or open-label sitagliptin phosphate, 100 mg daily, in addition to existing metformin therapy. The primary efficacy variable was the change in HbA_1c from baseline to Week 16 with last (postbaseline) observation carried forward.ResultsIn total, 169 participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups (colesevelam, n = 57; rosiglitazone, n = 56; and sitagliptin, n = 56), and 141 participants (83.4%) completed the study. Least-squares mean reductions in HbA_1c from baseline were observed in all groups at Week 16 last observation carried forward (colesevelam, -0.3% [P <.031]; rosiglitazone: -0.6% [P <.001]; sitagliptin: -0.4% [P <.009]) At study end, 10 of 56 participants (17.9%) in the colesevelam group, 19 of 54 (35.2%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 15 of 55 (27.3%) in the sitagliptin group achieved HbA_1c < 7.0%. Colesevelam significantly reduced mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels relative to baseline (11.6%), whereas levels were significantly increased with rosiglitazone and sitagliptin at Week 16 last observation carried forward (7.8% and 7.7%, respectively). Twenty-two of 52 participants (42.3%) in the colesevelam group, 12 of 51 (23.5%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 13 of 53 (24.5%) in the sitagliptin group achieved LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dL at Week 16 last observation carried forward.ConclusionAll 3 antidiabetes agents significantly improved glycemic control, but only colesevelam also significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 DM. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:53-63)     

Association of circulating selenium concentration with dyslipidemia: Results from the NHANES

BackgroundObservational studies have suggested that selenium levels might associate with the risk of cardio-metabolic diseases, but how circulating selenium is related to dyslipidemia remains inconclusive.ObjectivesTo investigate the association of circulating selenium levels with lipid profiles and dyslipidemia among US adults.MethodsUsing the data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 1999–2006), we performed multivariate logistic regression to examine the association of circulating selenium levels (in quartiles) with total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, and atherogenic index (AI).ResultsWe included 2903 adults (49.3 % male) (average age: 61.9) for analysis. Circulating selenium had non-linear association with TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and AI (all p < 0.05). When comparing with the lowest quartile, subjects with the highest quartile of circulating selenium (>147.00 μg/L) had the higher odds of elevated TG (OR: 1.75, 95% CI = 1.14, 2.68), TC (OR: 2.47, 95% CI = 1.62, 3.76), LDL-C (OR: 2.52, 95% CI = 1.60, 3.96), non-HDL-C (OR: 2.17, 95% CI = 1.41, 3.33), AI (OR: 1.20, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.97) and low-HDL-C (OR: 2.10, 95% CI = 1.19, 3.72). Similar patterns were observed in subgroup analysis.ConclusionsHigher circulating selenium levels had non-linear association with lipid profiles and the increased odds of dyslipidemia.     

Baseline cholesterol absorption and the response to ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the ENHANCE trial

Subjects with increased cholesterol absorption might benefit more from statin therapy combined with a cholesterol absorption inhibitor. We assessed whether baseline cholesterol absorption markers were associated with response to ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy, in terms of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering and cholesterol absorption inhibition, in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). In a posthoc analysis of the two-year ENHANCE trial, we assessed baseline cholesterol-adjusted campesterol (campesterol/TC) and sitosterol/TC ratios in 591 FH patients. Associations with LDL-C changes and changes in cholesterol absorption markers were evaluated by multiple regression analysis. No association was observed between baseline markers of cholesterol absorption and the extent of LDL-C response to ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy (β = 0.020, P = 0.587 for campesterol/TC and β<0.001, P = 0.992 for sitosterol/TC). Ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment reduced campesterol levels by 68% and sitosterol levels by 62%; reductions were most pronounced in subjects with the highest cholesterol absorption markers at baseline, the so-called high absorbers (P < 0.001). Baseline cholesterol absorption status does not determine LDL-C lowering response to ezetimibe/simvastatin therapy in FH, despite more pronounced cholesterol absorption inhibition in high absorbers. Hence, these data do not support the use of baseline absorption markers as a tool to determine optimal cholesterol lowering strategy in FH patients. However, due to the exploratory nature of any posthoc analysis, these results warrant further prospective evaluation in different populations.     

Inhibition of cholesterol absorption by the combination of dietary plant sterols and ezetimibe: effects on plasma lipid levels

Consumption of plant sterols and treatment with ezetimibe both reduce cholesterol absorption in the intestine. However, the mechanism of action differs between the two treatments, and the consequences of combination treatment are unknown. Therefore, we performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study for the plant sterol component with open-label ezetimibe treatment. Forty mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects were randomized to the following treatments for 4 weeks each: 10 mg/day ezetimibe combined with 25 g/day control spread; 10 mg/day ezetimibe combined with 25 g/day spread containing 2.0 g of plant sterols; 25 g/day spread containing 2.0 g of plant sterols; and placebo treatment consisting of 25 g/day control spread. Combination treatment of plant sterols and ezetimibe reduced low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 1.06 mmol/l (25.2%; P < 0.001) compared with 0.23 mmol/l (4.7%; P = 0.006) with plant sterols and 0.94 mmol/l (22.2%; P < 0.001) with ezetimibe monotherapy. LDL-C reduction conferred by the combination treatment did not differ significantly from ezetimibe monotherapy (-0.12 mmol/l or -3.5%; P = 0.13). Additionally, the plasma lathosterol-to-cholesterol ratio increased with all treatments. Sitosterol and campesterol ratios increased after plant sterol treatment and decreased upon ezetimibe and combination therapy. Our results indicate that the combination of plant sterols and ezetimibe has no therapeutic benefit over ezetimibe monotherapy in subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia.     

Low-density lipoprotein-associated variables and the severity of coronary artery disease: an untreated Chinese cohort study

Abstract

Background and aims: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is causal risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) and LDL-associated variables including LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (apoB), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipoprotein a [Lp(a)], small dense LDL (sd-LDL), and oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) have been widely used for predicting the risk of CAD. This study was aimed to compare the values of six LDL-related variables for predicting the severity of CAD using untreated patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG).

Methods: A group of 1977 individuals were consecutively enrolled and divided into CAD (n?=?1151) and non-CAD groups (n?=?826) according to the results of CAG. LDL-C, apoB, non-HDL-C, Lp(a), sd-LDL and ox-LDL were measured, respectively. The numbers of stenotic arteries and Gensini Scores (GS) were used to calculate the severity of CAD and the associations of six variables with the severity of CAD and predicting value of these parameters were simultaneously examined.

Results: CAD patients had significantly higher concentrations of LDL-related variables than non-CAD ones (all p?<?0.05). Importantly, all variables rose with the increase in the severity of CAD. The predicting value of CAD manifested as sd-LDL?>?ox-LDL?>?apoB?>?non-HDL-C?>?LDL-C?>?Lp(a) [area under curve (AUC): sd-LDL 0.641; ox-LDL 0.640; apoB 0.611; non-HDL-C 0.587; LDL-C 0.583; Lp(a) 0.554; respectively]. In multivariate logistic analysis, all variables showed as independent risk factors for the severity of CAD [odds ratio (OR): ox-LDL?>?sd-LDL?>?apoB?>?non-HDL-C?>?LDL-C?>?Lp(a)].

Conclusions: All of LDL-related variables could be useful marker for predicting the severity of CAD but sd-LDL and ox-LDL appeared to litter better. Further study may be needed to validate our results.     

载脂蛋白E基因多态性检测对ACS患者降脂疗效的影响

目的:探究载脂蛋白E(ApoE)基因多态性检测在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者降脂治疗的中应用价值。方法:选取2019年2月~2020年6月180例ACS患者,采用随机数字表法分为A、B、C共3组各60例,各组患者均接受ApoE基因多态性检测,并根据Sanger法测序判断ApoE基因表型(E2、E3、E4表型),A组予以瑞舒伐他汀口服(10 mg/d),B组予以瑞舒伐他汀强化治疗(20 mg/d),C组予以瑞舒伐他汀(10 mg/d)+依折麦布(10 mg/d)口服,连续治疗1个月,评价3组各基因表型血脂[总胆固醇(TC)、三酰甘油(TG)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)]改善情况、LDL-C达标率,记录药物副反应,所有患者随访1个月,统计心血管不良事件(MACE)发生情况。结果:3组ApoE基因E2、E3、E4表型构成比无显著差异(P>0.05)。治疗后,各组不同ApoE基因表型TC、TG、LDL-C水平均较治疗前下降,且变化率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),表现为E2型>E3型>E4型;其中,3组E2表型TC、TG、LDL-C水平变化率无显著差异(P>0.05);B组、C组E3表型TC、TG、LDL-C水平变化率均显著高于A组(P<0.05),但B组、C组各指标变化率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3组E4表型TC、TG、LDL-C水平变化率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且表现为C组>B组>A组。治疗后,A组LDL-C达标率为61.67%,显著低于B组的85.00%、C组的90.00%(P<0.05);其中,3组E2表型LDL-C达标率比较无显著差异(P>0.05),A组E3表型LDL-C达标率显著低于B组、C组(P<0.05),A组、B组E4表型LDL-C达标率低于C组(P<0.05)。治疗期间,仅B组出现1例ALT超出正常上限3倍,停药后可恢复正常。3组MACE发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),表现为A组发生率18.33%明显高于B组5.00%、C组3.33%(P<0.05),但3组E2、E4型MACE发生率均无明显差异(P>0.05),而A组E3型MACE发生率高于B组、C组(P<0.05)。结论:ACS患者降脂疗效与ApoE基因表型有关,对E2表型单用瑞舒伐他汀即可取得良好降脂效果,对E3表型强化瑞舒伐他汀或联合依折麦布治疗较单用瑞舒伐他汀均能提高降脂效果,而对E4表型联合依折麦布降脂效果优于单用瑞舒伐他汀或强化治疗。     

Effects of ezetimibe and simvastatin on apolipoprotein B metabolism in males with mixed hyperlipidemia

Sixteen hyperlipidemic men were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study to evaluate the effect of ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, coadministered and alone, on the in vivo kinetics of apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 and B-100 in humans. Subjects underwent a primed-constant infusion of a stable isotope in the fed state. The coadministration of simvastatin and ezetimibe significantly reduced plasma concentrations of cholesterol (−43.0%), LDL-C (−53.6%), and triglycerides (−44.0%). Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) apoB-48 pool size (PS) was significantly decreased (−48.9%) following combination therapy mainly through a significant reduction in TRL apoB-48 production rate (PR) (−38.0%). The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of VLDL and LDL apoB-100 were significantly increased with all treatment modalities compared with placebo, leading to a significant reduction in the PS of these fractions. We also observed a positive correlation between changes in TRL apoB-48 PS and changes in TRL apoB-48 PR (r = 0.85; P < 0.0001) with combination therapy. Our results indicate that treatment with simvastatin plus ezetimibe is effective in reducing plasma TRL apoB-48 levels and that this effect is most likely mediated by a reduction in the intestinal secretion of TRL apoB-48. Our study also indicated that the reduction in LDL-C concentration following combination therapy is mainly driven by an increase in FCR of apoB-100 containing lipoproteins.     

血清CTRP5、CTRP12、CTRP13与老年2型糖尿病患者糖脂代谢和颈动脉粥样硬化的关系

摘要 目的：探讨血清补体1q/肿瘤坏死因子相关蛋白（CTRP）5、CTRP12、CTRP13与老年2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者糖脂代谢和颈动脉粥样硬化（CAS）的关系。方法：选取2021年1月～2023年1月徐州医科大学附属医院收治的198例老年T2DM患者纳入T2DM组,另选取同期100名体检健康老年人纳入对照组,根据是否CAS将老年T2DM患者分为CAS组131例和非CAS组67例。检测血清CTRP5、CTRP12、CTRP13和糖脂代谢指标[空腹血糖（FPG）、餐后2h血糖（2hBG）、糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）、稳态模型评估-胰岛素抵抗指数（HOMA-IR）、总胆固醇（TC）、三酰甘油（TG）、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL-C）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）]。采用Pearson相关性分析老年T2DM患者血清CTRP5、CTRP12、CTRP13与糖脂代谢指标水平的相关性,采用多因素Logistic回归模型和受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析老年T2DM患者CAS的影响因素及血清CTRP5、CTRP12、CTRP13水平对其的诊断价值。结果：与对照组比较,T2DM组血清CTRP5、FPG、2hBG、HbA1c、HOMA-IR、TC、TG、LDL-C水平升高,CTRP12、CTRP13、HDL-C水平降低（P＜0.05）。Pearson相关性分析显示,老年T2DM患者血清CTRP5与FPG、2hBG、HbA1c、HOMA-IR、TC、TG、LDL-C水平呈正相关,与HDL-C水平呈负相关（P＜0.05）;血清CTRP12、CTRP13与FPG、2hBG、HbA1c、HOMA-IR、TC、TG、LDL-C水平呈负相关,与HDL-C水平呈正相关（P＜0.05）。多因素Logistic回归模型分析显示,HbA1c、HOMA-IR、LDL-C、CTRP5升高为老年T2DM患者CAS的独立危险因素,CTRP12、CTRP13升高为独立保护因素（P＜0.05）。ROC曲线分析显示,血清CTRP5、CTRP12、CTRP13水平联合诊断老年T2DM患者CAS的曲线下面积（AUC）为0.915,大于血清CTRP5、CTRP12、CTRP13水平单独诊断的0.790、0.785、0.789。结论：老年T2DM患者血清CTRP5水平升高,CTRP12、CTRP13水平降低,与糖脂代谢紊乱和CAS密切相关,血清CTRP5、CTRP12、CTRP13水平联合对老年T2DM患者CAS具有较高的诊断价值。     

Low-level environmental lead and cadmium exposures and dyslipidemia in adults: Findings from the NHANES 2005–2016

BackgroundPrevious experimental and occupational health studies have shown the toxic effects of relatively high-level cadmium and lead on lipid metabolism. However, limited studies investigated the relationships between serum lipid levels and exposure to low-level lead and cadmium in adults.ObjectiveTo investigate the associations between lead and cadmium levels in blood and dyslipidemia in adults.MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional study of 7,457 adults aged 20–79 years who were recruited in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005–2016) was conducted. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to examine the associations of blood lead and cadmium levels with serum lipid profiles and risk of dyslipidemia, respectively.ResultsThe weighted geometric means [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] of lead and cadmium in blood were 1.23 (1.21, 1.25) μg/dL and 0.36 (0.35, 0.37) μg/L, respectively. Blood lead was significantly associated with serum total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (Apo B) levels after adjusting for covariates. Compared with the adults in the lowest blood lead quartile (≤0.76 μg/dL), those in the highest lead quartile (>1.90 μg/dL) had higher risks of elevated TC (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.59–2.22), non-HDL-C (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.33–1.91), LDL-C (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.41–1.99) and Apo B (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.46–2.73). However, the single effect of cadmium exposure and the joint effect of lead and cadmium exposures on dyslipidemia were not observed.ConclusionBlood lead well below the current recommended level was positively associated with the risk of dyslipidemia in adults, while the low-level cadmium exposure currently observed in adults did not show any significant associations with lipid levels.     

Advances in Lipid Testing and Management in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo review the pathophysiologic basis for the classic phenotype associated with diabetic dyslipidemia, discuss recent advances in lipid and lipoprotein testing for risk assessment and lipid therapy monitoring, and summarize a systematic approach to the clinical management of diabetic dyslipidemia.MethodsWe review the pertinent literature, including treatment guidelines and results of major clinical trials, and discuss the effectiveness of various pharmacologic interventions for management of lipid levels in patients with diabetes.ResultsThe incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus continue to escalate globally at alarming rates. Diabetes predisposes to multiple microvascular and macrovascular complications, including cardiovascular disease, the number 1 cause of mortality in the United States. The third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel in 2001 identified diabetes as a coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalent, in light of the evidence that CHD risk in persons with diabetes is similar to that of nondiabetic persons with established CHD. Diabetic dyslipidemia is characterized by a constellation of lipid derangements—hypertriglyceridemia, a low concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and a high concentration of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles—that accelerate the progression of atherosclerotic disease and the development of atherothrombotic events.ConclusionStatin trials have demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases, including in patients with diabetes. Nevertheless, many patients who achieve their LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) goal still have residual CHD risk. Diabetic dyslipidemia contributes to this residual risk because of the increased concentration of atherogenic apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins that can persist despite normalized LDL-C levels and low HDL-C levels. Recent clinical trials emphasize the importance of intensive lipid lowering to achieve recommended goals for LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:641-652)     

血清UA、Hcy、LDL-C联合监测对急性脑梗死患者阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗后脑出血性转化的预测价值

摘要 目的：探讨血清尿酸（UA）、同型半胱氨酸（Hcy）和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）联合监测对急性脑梗死（ACI）患者阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗后脑出血性转化（HT）的预测价值。方法：选取2018年1月～2020年12月西南医科大学附属成都三六三医院收治的173例接受阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗的ACI患者,根据静脉溶栓后是否发生HT分为HT组和非HT组。对比两组的临床资料和血清UA、Hcy、LDL-C水平,采用多因素Logistic回归分析ACI患者阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗后发生HT的影响因素,采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析血清UA、Hcy、LDL-C联合监测对ACI患者阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗后发生HT的预测价值。结果：173例患者中有47例发生HT,发生率为27.17％。与非HT组比较,HT组年龄更大,收缩压、舒张压、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表（NIHSS）评分、溶栓前随机血糖以及Hcy水平更高,而LDL-C及UA水平更低（P＜0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示：收缩压、NIHSS评分、溶栓前随机血糖以及Hcy水平为ACI患者阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗后发生HT的危险因素,而UA、LDL-C水平为保护因素。ROC曲线分析结果显示：血清UA、Hcy、LDL-C单独与联合监测预测ACI患者阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗后HT的曲线下面积（AUC）分别为0.764、0.794、0.674、0.888,联合监测时的AUC明显更高。结论：血清UA、LDL-C低水平和Hcy高水平是ACI患者阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗后HT的影响因素,联合监测能提高对HT发生的预测价值。     

中西医结合治疗对T2DM合并CHD患者血糖、血脂及血管内皮功能的影响

目的:探讨中西医结合治疗对2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并冠心病(CHD)患者血糖、血脂及血管内皮功能的影响。方法:将120例T2DM合并CHD患者上随机分为研究组与对照组各60例,在原饮食、运动疗法及降压、降糖治疗方案不变的条件下,对照组加用阿托伐他汀钙片治疗,研究组加用阿托伐他汀钙片与降脂通脉胶囊治疗。检测和比较两组治疗前后总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2h血糖(2h PBG)、一氧化氮(NO)及内皮素(CE)-1水平的变化。结果:两组治疗后FBG、2h PBG水平均较治疗前明显下降(P0.05),而组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组治疗后TG、TC、LDL-C水平均较治疗前明显下降(P0.05),HDL-C水平均较治疗前明显升高(P0.05),且研究组TG、TC、LDL-C水平显著低于对照组(P0.05),HDL-C水平显著高于对照组(P0.05)。两组治疗后血清NO水平均较治疗前明显升高(P0.05),血清CE水平均较治疗前明显下降(P0.05),且研究组血清NO水平明显高于对照组(P0.05),血清CE水平明显低于对照组(P0.05)。两组治疗过程中均未见明显不良反应。结论:降脂通脉胶囊联合阿托伐他汀可显著改善T2DM合并CHD患者的血脂和血管内皮功能,但不会进一步降低血糖。     

Effects of ezetimibe on markers of synthesis and absorption of cholesterol in high-risk patients with elevated C-reactive protein

AimsHigh-risk subjects with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) are at high risk for cardiovascular events and frequently require potent statins or combined lipid-lowering therapy to achieve lipid targets and decrease inflammation. Our study aimed at evaluating the effects of three lipid-modifying therapies on LDL-cholesterol, CRP levels and markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis.Main methodsA prospective intervention study was performed in high cardiovascular risk individuals receiving atorvastatin 10 mg daily for four weeks. Those with CRP ≥ 2.0 mg/L were randomized to another four-week treatment period with atorvastatin 40 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg or the combination of atorvastatin 40 mg / ezetimibe 10 mg. Lipids, markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), and synthesis (desmosterol), as well as CRP were quantified at baseline and end of study.Key findingsOne hundred and twenty two individuals were included. Atorvastatin alone or combined with ezetimibe reduced both LDL-cholesterol and CRP (P < 0.002 vs. baseline; Wilcoxon); ezetimibe did not modify CRP. Ezetimibe-based therapies reduced absorption markers and their ratios to cholesterol (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline, for all; Wilcoxon), whereas atorvastatin alone increased campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios (P < 0.05 vs. baseline; Wilcoxon). In addition, ezetimibe also increased desmosterol and desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline; Wilcoxon).SignificanceThese results contribute to understanding the link between cellular cholesterol homeostasis, inflammation and lipid-modifying therapies. Our findings highlight the broader benefit of combined therapy with a potent statin and ezetimibe decreasing inflammation, and preventing increase in cholesterol biosynthesis, an effect not observed with ezetimibe alone.     

2型糖尿病合并冠心病患者血清IL-6、PCT、CatS、Gal-3与糖脂代谢、胰岛素抵抗和心功能的相关性分析

摘要 目的：探讨2型糖尿病（T2DM）合并冠心病患者血清白介素-6（IL-6）、降钙素原（PCT）、组织蛋白酶S（CatS）、半乳糖凝集素3（Gal-3）与糖脂代谢、胰岛素抵抗和心功能的相关性。方法：选择我院2019年2月～2021年2月收治的102例T2DM患者,将其根据是否伴有冠心病分成单纯T2DM组（n=62）和T2DM合并冠心病组（n=40）。另取同期健康体检人员50例作为对照组。比较三组血清IL-6、PCT、CatS、Gal-3水平。对比单纯T2DM组与T2DM合并冠心病组间糖脂代谢、胰岛素抵抗和心功能指标差异,并分析血清IL-6、PCT、CatS、Gal-3与上述指标的相关性。结果：单纯T2DM组、T2DM合并冠心病组的血清IL-6、PCT、CatS、Gal-3水平均高于对照组,且T2DM合并冠心病组上述各项指标水平均高于单纯T2DM组（P＜0.05）。T2DM合并冠心病组空腹血糖（FPG）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）水平以及胰岛素抵抗指数（HOMA-IR）均高于单纯T2DM组（P＜0.05）,而两组间餐后2 h血糖（2hPG）、糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）、甘油三酯（TG）、总胆固醇（TC）、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL-C）、空腹胰岛素（FINS）水平比较无统计学差异（P>0.05）。T2DM合并冠心病组左心室射血分数（LVEF）、左心室收缩末期容积（LVESV）及左心室舒张末期容积（LVEDV）均低于单纯T2DM组（P＜0.05）。Pearson相关性分析结果显示：T2DM合并冠心病患者的血清IL-6、PCT、CatS、Gal-3水平与LDL-C水平、HOMA-IR均呈正相关,而与LVEF、LVESV、LVEDV均呈负相关（P＜0.05）。结论：T2DM合并冠心病患者血清IL-6、PCT、CatS、Gal-3水平呈异常高表达,且和糖脂代谢、胰岛素抵抗和心功能密切相关,对患者病情具有一定辅助评估价值。     

阿托伐他汀联合依折麦布对冠心病患者氧化应激及血脂水平的影响

目的:探讨依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀对冠心病患者氧化应激及血脂水平的影响及临床疗效。方法:选择2013年8月-2016年8月于我院接受治疗的冠心病患者144例,随机分为对照组和研究组,每组72例。对照组患者给予阿托伐他汀及硝酸甘油治疗,研究组患者给予阿托伐他汀和依折麦布治疗。观察并比较两组患者治疗前后血清过氧化物酶(MPO)、丙二醇(MDA)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三脂(TG)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)及高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)水平、心功能及临床疗效。结果:研究组患者临床总有效率(87.5%)效显著高于对照组(76.4%),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后,两组患者血清MDA及MPO水平均降低,而SOD水平均升高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,治疗后研究组患者血清MDA及MPO水平较低,而SOD水平较高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,两组患者血清HDL-C水平均升高,而LDL-C,TC及TG水平均降低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,治疗后研究组患者血清HDL-C水平较高,而LDL-C,TC及TG水平较低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后LVEDD及LVESD均降低,而LVEF均升高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,研究组患者治疗后LVEDD及LVESD较低,而LVEF较高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀治疗冠心病的临床疗效显著,能够降低患者血脂水平,改善氧化应激反应及心功能,值得临床推广应用。