Management of Nondiagnostic Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Survey of Endocrinologists

ObjectiveTo evaluate the approach of endocrinologists in the setting of nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies.MethodsIn 2002, we surveyed physicians attending the national annual meetings of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the Endocrine Society of North America, using a 13-item questionnaire. The responses were tallied and analyzed.ResultsOf the 143 respondents, 139 were endocrinologists, with a male:female ratio of 2.5:1. Most respondents were involved in a medical practice in North America, but Europe, Asia, New Zealand, and Australia were also represented. Of those performing thyroid FNA biopsy, 31% used thyroid ultrasound guidance. Among the survey respondents, 16%, 49%, 20%, and 15% performed less than 2, 2 to 5, 6 to 10, and more than 10 thyroid FNA biopsies per month, respectively. Among the respondents, 13.5%, 44%, 28.5%, 10%, and 4% had nondiagnostic rates of less than 5%, 5 to 10%, 11 to 20%, 21 to 30%, and more than 30%, respectively. The approach of the respondents to an initially nondiagnostic FNA was repeated FNA biopsy in 87%, observation in 7%, levothyroxine suppression in 4%, and thyroid scintigraphy in 2%. Respondents believed that the most cost-effective approach in a patient with nondiagnostic FNA was repeated biopsy (82%), monitoring the size of the thyroid nodule (17%), and surgical referral (< 1%). No one was willing to repeat the thyroid biopsy more than three times.ConclusionOn the basis of findings in our survey, most endocrinologists repeat thyroid FNA at least once when confronted with a nondiagnostic result. No published studies have demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of this approach versus proceeding to surgical intervention or observation. We hope that this survey will encourage further studies on this issue. (Endocr Pract. 2004;10: 317-323)     

Surgical Utility of Afirma: Effects of High Cancer Prevalence and Oncocytic Cell Types in Patients with Indeterminate Thyroid Cytology

ObjectiveThe Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) molecular marker assay was developed for the purpose of improving surgical decision-making with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies of thyroid nodules. In this paper, we analyze the performance of the GEC over 27 months in a community hospital-based thyroid surgery practice.MethodsWe began using GEC and Thyroid Cytopathology Partners (TCP) exclusively for thyroid FNA analysis in January 2011, shortly after the Afirma GEC became commercially available. In this paper, we focus on patients with indeterminate FNA results and the outcomes of GEC analysis, with particular attention paid to the calculation of the negative predictive value (NPV) of the Afirma test.ResultsWe performed 645 FNAs in 519 patients over 27 months. Overall, 58 FNAs (9%) were read as indeterminate, with 36 of these classified as suspicious by GEC (62%), 20 characterized as GEC benign (34%), and 2 determined to be inadequate due to low mRNA content. Of the 36 suspicious GEC patients, 30 underwent thyroidectomy, and 21 of the 30 had malignant final pathology. Of the 20 benign GEC patients, 5 underwent thyroid surgery, and 2 were discovered to have malignancies. The NPV for the Afirma GEC in our practice environment was 89.6%.ConclusionIn a practice with a high incidence of thyroid cancer in patients with indeterminate FNAs (33% for our practice), the NPV of the Afirma GEC test may not be as robust as suggested in the existing literature. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:364-369)     

Repeatedly nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspirations do not modify malignancy risk

Objective: Thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic (ND) fine-needle aspirations (FNA) typically undergo repeat sampling. While repeat FNA is often diagnostic, little is known regarding the significance of repeatedly ND aspirates. Limited data suggest there is very low, if any, risk of malignancy for repeatedly ND FNAs. Study Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of ND thyroid FNAs over a nearly 6-year period at our institution to further address this question. Results: There were 834 ND thyroid FNAs, representing 694 distinct thyroid nodules. Repeat FNA was performed after an initial ND aspirate in 52% of cases (363/694); 19% (70/363) had at least one additional ND diagnosis on repeat FNA. Surgical follow-up was available for 57 cases. Malignancy was identified histologically in 21% (9/42) of nodules after a single ND FNA and in 20% (3/15) of nodules with 2 or more repeatedly ND aspirates. Accounting for all benign cytologic follow-up, the overall risk of malignancy was 4% [12/303; 3.5% (9/255) following a single ND FNA and 6.3% (3/48) after repeated ND FNAs]. Conclusion: We observed no modification of malignancy risk when repeated FNAs were ND. Clinical management for an ND aspirate should remain repeat aspiration along with clinical and sonographic correlation.     

Prediction of Nondiagnostic Results in Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: utility of On-Site Gross Visual Assessment of Specimens for Liquid-Based Cytology

Objective: To explore a comprehensive approach for on-site gross visual assessments of liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens of thyroid nodules and determine morphologic criteria that help predict nondiagnostic rates.Methods: Two-hundred nodules from 165 patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) at our hospital were included in this prospectively designed, retrospective analysis. Specimens were visually assessed on-site for three morphologic categories (specimen color, specimen volume, and particle count) using a 5-point grading.Results: Twenty-two nodules (11%) showed nondiagnostic results. Regarding specimen color, nondiagnostic rates tended to be higher in grades 1 (75%) and 5 (100%) than in grades 2 (18%), 3 (8%), or 4 (17%), with a significant difference between grade 1 and grade 3 (P = .003). For specimen volume, nondiagnostic results were significantly more common in grade 1 (33%) and 5 (33%) than in grades 3 (5%) or 4 (1%) (P<.005). There was a significant negative correlation between the grading of the particle count and the nondiagnostic rate (Spearman ρ = -1.000; P<.001). The sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of nondiagnostic results were 77% and 76%, respectively, at the optimal cutoff value of 2 (grade 2 or lower).Conclusion: Particle count was an important morphologic criterion that helped predict nondiagnostic rates in LBC specimens of thyroid nodules, and the specimen color and volume were also useful adjuncts. In routine practice, on-site gross visual assessment followed by resampling (if necessary) may potentially help reduce the rates of nondiagnostic results, repeat FNAs, and the number of unnecessary needle passes.Abbreviations: FNA = fine-needle aspiration; LBC = liquid-based cytology; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; US = ultrasonography     

The Value of Gross Visual Assessment of Specimen Adequacy for Liquid-Based Cytology During Ultrasound-Guided,Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Major problems of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules arise due to nondiagnostic results caused by inadequately obtained FNA specimens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of visual assessment of liquid-based cytology specimens during FNA of thyroid nodules for predicting sampling adequacy.Methods: For 3 months, visual assessment of FNA specimens was used for 534 consecutive nodules in 534 patients. The FNA specimens were visually graded immediately following aspiration for each nodule, and the visual grades were classified into 2 categories: inadequate (<6 cell groups) and adequate (>6 cell groups). The cytology results were classified as diagnostic or nondiagnostic based on the Bethesda system. We compared the ultrasound features and FNA characteristics between the diagnostic and nondiagnostic results. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors independently predictive of nondiagnostic results. We also evaluated the interobserver agreement regarding the visual assessment.Results: Visual assessment was feasible in all patients, and the nondiagnostic rate was 11.6% (62 of 534). Nondiagnostic results were more frequent in the inadequate visual assessment group (38.1%) than in the adequate visual assessment group (10.5%) (P = .001). Independent predictive factors for nondiagnostic results were inadequate visual assessment (odds ratio, 5.18), >50% vascularity (odds ratio, 3.98), and macrocalcification (odds ratio, 3.60). Interobserver agreement for the prediction of visual assessment was good (κ value, 0.767; P<.001).Conclusion: Immediate visual assessment of a specimen during FNA of a thyroid nodule is a feasible method for predicting sampling adequacy.Abbreviations: FNA = fine-needle aspiration LBC = liquid-based cytology US = ultrasound     

Correlation of Findings from Iodine 123 Scan and Ultrasonography in the Recommendation for Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of correlating findings from iodine I 123 (¹²³I) radionuclide scans and thyroid ultrasonography on the decision to perform fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of thyroid nodules.MethodsIodine 123 scans and sonographic images of adult patients who had both examinations performed within 6 months of each other at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of 1 or more nodules satisfying imaging-specific criteria for recommending FNA biopsy was recorded. Iodine 123 scan and sonographic images were then directly compared to determine how frequently the FNA recommendation would be affected by discordant findings.ResultsThe study included 97 adult patients, with a total of 291 thyroid lobes (right thyroid lobe, left thyroid lobe, and isthmus). Recommendations for FNA biopsy were concordant in 231 of 291 lobes (79.4%), with both modalities recommending FNA biopsy in 55 lobes and not recommending FNA biopsy in 176 lobes. A discordant recommendation occurred in 60 of 291 lobes (20.6%). Using only ultrasonography findings, a recommendation for FNA biopsy was not indicated for 11 of the 291 lobes (3.8%) with functioning nodules. Using only ¹²³I findings, a recommendation for FNA biopsy was not indicated for 23 of the 291 lobes (7.9%); 13 had nodules, but none that fulfilled sonographic criteria, and 10 had no identifiable nodule on ultrasonography. Iodine 123 scan did not identify 26 lobes with nodules (8.9%) for which FNA biopsy was recommended based on ultrasonography findings.ConclusionRecommendations for FNA biopsy should not be based on the presence of hypofunctioning regions on ¹²³I scan without sonographic confirmation. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:699-706)     

Timing of repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration in the management of thyroid nodules

Objective: The Bethesda System for reporting thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) recommends repeat aspirations be done at least 3 months following the initial aspiration to prevent false-positive misinterpretations due to reactive/reparative changes. Because limited data exists, we reviewed our own data to ascertain the recommendation. Study Design: We retrospectively reviewed thyroid FNAs accessioned in the Cytology Laboratory at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Mass., USA, from January 2006 to December 2008. We identified patients with repeat aspirates of a single lesion and those with thyroidectomy specimens. Cytologic and surgical diagnoses along with time between FNAs were recorded. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected in the distribution among nondiagnostic, suboptimal, and adequate categories with respect to the timing of repeat FNA (p = 0.25). Forty-six percent of the lesions that were nondiagnostic/suboptimal initially yielded the same results on repeat. Twenty-eight percent of initially adequate specimens were nondiagnostic/suboptimal on repeat (p = 0.04). Nine percent of those with an initial atypical diagnosis had the same diagnosis on repeat, while 2.6% of those who did not have an initial atypical diagnosis had an atypical diagnosis on repeat (p = 0.29). False positives between early (16%) and late (12%) repeats were not statistically significant (p = 0.74). Conclusion: The diagnostic yield and accuracy of repeat FNA is independent of the time interval between procedures but may be related to the original FNA diagnosis.     

The Role of Core-Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules with Initially Nondiagnostic Fine-Needle Aspiration Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This study evaluated the prevalence of nondiagnostic results, diagnostic performance, and complications of core-needle biopsy (CNB) compared with repeat fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for thyroid nodules with previous nondiagnostic FNA findings.Methods: The Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were thoroughly searched for studies evaluating CNB or repeat FNA for thyroid nodules with initially nondiagnostic FNA results. Pooled proportions of nondiagnostic results of CNB and repeat FNA were calculated. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CNB and repeat FNA for a diagnosis of malignancy using a bivariate random-effects model. Complication rates were also evaluated.Results: A review of 52 articles identified 4 eligible articles, involving 1,028 patients with 1,028 thyroid nodules, which were included in the meta-analysis. CNB demonstrated significantly lower rates of nondiagnostic results (6.4%) than repeat FNA (36.5%) (P<.0001). In the 3 studies that analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of CNB in diagnosing malignancy, CNB demonstrated significantly higher summary estimates of sensitivity (89.8%) than repeat FNA (60.6%) (P = .022), but summary specificity did not differ between CNB (99.2%) and repeat FNA (99.0%) (P = .576). None of the patients who underwent CNB or repeat FNA experienced any major complications.Conclusion: CNB demonstrates lower rates of nondiagnostic results and higher diagnostic accuracy than repeat FNA. CNB, rather than repeat FNA, can be utilized to diagnose thyroid nodules previously nondiagnostic on FNA.Abbreviations:CI = confidence intervalCNB = core-needle biopsyFNA = fine-needle aspirationSROC = summary receiver operating characteristicUS = ultrasound     

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy with Core-Needle Biopsy in the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic rate of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) with the diagnostic rate of combined FNAB and core-needle biopsy in the evaluation of nodular thyroid disease.MethodsWe performed a retrospective case-control study by reviewing charts of patients who underwent ultrasound-guided FNAB and core-needle biopsy of the thyroid at a tertiary referral center from January 1999 to December 2001. Results were classified as diagnostic (negative, suspicious, or positive for malignancy) or nondiagnostic. These findings were compared with an age- and sex-matched control group who underwent only FNAB. Complications between the groups were reviewed.ResultsThe patient group consisted of 320 patients who underwent 340 ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and core-needle biopsies of the thyroid; the control group consisted of 311 patients who underwent 340 FNABs. There was no significant difference in the nondiagnostic rates between groups—12.9% in patients who had FNAB–only compared with 10.9% in patients who had both procedures (proportion difference, -2.1%; 95% confidence interval, -7.0% to 2.9%; P = .41). There was a trend towards an increased incidence of hematoma and infection in the core biopsy group. In the group that underwent FNAB and core-needle biopsies, 10 patients (3.1%) developed biopsy-specific complications (hematomas in 8 patients, biopsy site infections in 2 patients). In the FNAB only group, 3 patients (1.0%) developed hematomas; there was no incidence of infection.ConclusionsIn the evaluation of thyroid nodules, the addition of core-needle biopsies to FNAB confers little benefit in decreasing the nondiagnostic rates and may be associated with increased complications. Core-needle biopsies should not be routinely performed in the evaluation of thyroid nodules, but rather, patient selection for the more invasive core biopsy should be done judiciously. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:426-431)     

Preoperative Ultrasonography Findings Predict the Need for Repeated Surgery in Papillary Thyroid Cancer

ObjectiveTo determine the impact of neck ultrasonography in predicting papillary thyroid cancer persistence or recurrence.MethodsBetween March 2005 and March 2009, we identified patients with a preoperative diagnosis of papillary thyroid cancer. Exclusion criteria included no documented preoperative ultrasonography and initial surgery at an outside institution. Patients with positive preoperative ultrasonography were compared with patients who had negative preoperative ultrasonography by assessing rates of neck dissection, complications, disease persistence or recurrence, and the need for repeated surgery.Results:Of 127 patients initially identified, 16 did not have preoperative ultrasonography and 4 did not have their initial surgery at our institution, leaving 107 patients in our cohort. Twenty-two patients had positive preoperative ultrasonography and 85 patients had negative preoperative ultrasonography. Patients with positive preoperative ultrasonography had a higher rate of repeated surgery than those with negative preoperative ultrasonography (27% vs 4.7%, P = .003). There was no difference in postoperative complication rates. No patients with negative preoperative ultrasonography and an ultrasound report stating specifically “no suspicious lymph nodes” required repeated surgery.ConclusionsNegative preoperative ultrasonography with specific lymph node evaluation predicts a low risk of needing early reoperation. Positive preoperative ultrasonography may be a marker for more aggressive disease and the best predictor of the need for additional surgery in the future. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:403-409)     

Preoperative and Postoperative Evaluation of Thyroid Disease in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment of Primary Hyperparathyroidism

ObjectiveTo evaluate the occurrence of thyroid disease in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism.MethodsIn this case series, records of all patients with a diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy between January 2005 and December 2008 in our clinic were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperatively, all patients were evaluated with ultrasonography and parathyroid scintigraphy; when needed, thyroid scintigraphy and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were used. All patients underwent standard neck exploration. Postoperative histopathologic findings of thyroid tissue were classified as nodular/ multinodular hyperplasia, Hashimoto thyroiditis, papillary thyroid carcinoma, or normal.ResultsFifty-one women and 9 men were included. In the 60 patients, preoperative ultrasonography revealed thyroiditis (without nodules) in 13 (22%), a solitary nodule in 9 (15%) (coexistent with thyroiditis in 7 patients), multinodular goiter in 24 (40%) (coexistent with thyroiditis in 5 patients), and normal findings in 14 (23%). Rates of thyroiditis and nodular goiter were 42% and 55%, respectively. Collectively, prevalence of thyroid disease was 77%. Total thyroidectomy was performed in 27 patients, and hemithyroidectomy was performed in 15 patients. Indications for total thyroidectomy were nondiagnostic or suspicious FNAB results in 5 patients, hyperthyroidism in 4 patients, ultrasonography findings in 11 patients, and intraoperatively recognized suspicious nodularity in 7 patients. Postoperatively, thyroid carcinoma was diagnosed in 9 patients (15%).ConclusionsThyroid disease, particularly thyroid carcinoma, is common in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. This association should be considered when selecting the surgical procedure. Intraoperative evaluation of the thyroid is as important as preoperative evaluation with ultrasonography and FNAB in patients with thyroid disease and primary hyperparathyroidism. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:7-13)     

Utility of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier for Evaluation of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules and Correlation with Ultrasound Risk Assessment: Single Institutional Experience

Objective: We assessed our experience with Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) combined with sono-graphic risk assessment, using both the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in evaluating indeterminate thyroid nodules.Methods: We identified 98 patients with 101 nodules who had a second fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017, and sent to Veracyte for cytopathology and subsequent Afirma GEC testing. A second FNA biopsy was performed if the initial cytopathology was either Bethesda III or IV (n = 94) or nondiagnostic (n = 7). We correlated cytopathology, histopathology, and Afirma GEC results with sonographic risk assessment using both the ATA system and TI-RADS.Results: The mean age of the cohort was 57.4 ± 12.3 years; 84% women and 60% white. Repeat FNA was benign in 51 of 101 nodules, and of the remaining 50 nodules, 18 (36%) were GEC-benign and 32 (64%) GEC-suspicious. Eighteen of the 32 GEC-suspicious nodules underwent surgery with the following results: 7 benign (39%), 1 follicular thyroid carcinoma (6%), 6 follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer (33%), and 4 noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features (22%). The malignancy rate among the surgical cohort was 39% (without noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP]) and 61% (with NIFTP) and about 50% and 20% of this group scored in the high suspicion category by ATA and TR5 by TI-RADS, respectively.Conclusion: Afirma GEC was useful in avoiding surgery in one-third of indeterminate nodules and performed similarly to ATA and TI-RADS. However, the use of echogenicity in scoring may underestimate the risk of malignancy in patients with indeterminate nodules.Abbreviations:ATA = American Thyroid Association; AUS = Atypia of Undetermined Significance; FLUS = Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNA = fine needle aspiration; FTC = follicular thyroid cancer; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer; GEC = Gene Expression Classifier; ND = nondiagnostic; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; TR = TI-RADS     

Predicting Malignant Involvement in a Thyroid Nodule: Role of Ultrasonography

ObjectiveTo assess how ultrasonography can contribute during the evaluation of a thyroid nodule and whether this technique can have a role in predicting malignant involvement.MethodsIn this retrospective study, data were analyzed on 220 consecutive patients (with 348 thyroid nodules) who underwent thyroidectomy and had previously undergone assessment by high-resolution thyroid ultrasonography. Nodule size, echogenicity, regularity of margins, halo sign, presence or absence of calcifications, and invasion of surrounding tissues were evaluated. The nodules were classified as low, medium, or high risk for malignant involvement on the basis of nodule characteristics found on ultrasonography. All nodules were submitted to cytologic examination by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) before thyroidectomy. Ultrasound, FNA, and pathologic postoperative results were compared.ResultsAmong the 348 thyroid nodules, 56 were ultrasonographically classified as low risk, 268 as medium risk, and 24 as high risk for malignant potential. Fifty of 56 (89.3%) low-risk nodules and 213 of 268 (79.5%) medium-risk nodules were diagnosed as benign at pathologic postoperative examination. In contrast, however, only 6 of 24 (25%) high-risk nodules were diagnosed as benign. Among the 18 high-risk nodules of 1-cm diameter or larger, FNA showed a 20% false-negative result.ConclusionHigh-risk classification of a thyroid nodule on ultrasonography had a positive predictive value for malignant involvement of 75%. Nodule characteristics analyzed by ultrasonography should be considered at the time of surgical intervention. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13: 219-224)     

Guideline Implementation on Fine-Needle Aspiration for Thyroid Nodules: Focusing on Micronodules

Objective: We investigated patients who were referred to our institution after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed at outside clinics to evaluate how many nodules satisfied the FNA indications of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and compare that to the number of thyroid nodules that satisfy the FNA indications of the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2018, 2,628 patients were included in our study. The included patients were those referred for thyroid surgery after having a suspicious thyroid nodule. We retrospectively applied the three guidelines to each thyroid nodule and determined whether each nodule satisfied the FNA indications. We compared the proportion of nodules satisfying the FNA indications of each guideline using a generalized linear model and generalized estimating equation.Results: The median size of the 2,628 thyroid nodules was 0.9 cm (range, 0.2 to 9.5 cm). We found that FNA was not indicated for 54.1%, 47.7%, and 19.1% of nodules and 87.3%, 99.0%, and 97.8% among them were micronodules (<1 cm) according to the ACR-TIRADS, ATA guideline, and K-TIRADS, respectively. The proportion of micronodules which satisfied the FNA indications was significantly higher for the K-TIRADS (65.1%) compared to the ACR TIRADS (12.1%) and ATA guideline (12.1%) (P<.001).Conclusion: Among patients referred for thyroid surgery to our institutions, about 35% of the micronodules underwent FNA despite not being appropriate for indications by the K-TIRADS. Systematic training for physicians as well as modifications to increase the sensitivity of the guideline may be needed to reduce the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancers, especially for micronodules.     

Thyroid Cytology and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: Differences Among Indeterminate Specimens

ObjectiveTo assess the potential for stratification of indeterminate cytologic findings on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules in an effort to improve therapeutic strategies.MethodsWe attempted to determine the malignant risk associated with various indeterminate FNA cytologic patterns by correlation of specimens with the final histologic diagnosis. For this analysis, we identified 294 computerized medical records of surgically treated thyroid nodules during a 5-year period at our institution with the corresponding FNA cytology reports available.ResultsOf the 294 surgical cases, 162 with a positive or indeterminate cytologic report were selected, reviewed, and classified. Of 52 patients with positive cytologic findings on FNA, 51 (98%) had a final histologic report of a malignant thyroid nodule. Of 110 patients with indeterminate specimens, 30 (27%) had a final histologic diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma. The presence of nuclear atypia was predictive of thyroid carcinoma in 75% of patients, a Hürthle cell cytologic pattern was associated with a malignant thyroid nodule in 33%, and a hypercellular smear was suggestive of malignant involvement in 26% of cases. The lowest rate of malignant potential was associated with cytologic microfollicular and scant colloid alone subtype (6%).ConclusionThe results of this study show that indeterminate thyroid cytologic specimens can be subdivided into groups with different malignant risks. A microfollicular cytologic pattern in the absence of a hypercellular smear or nuclear atypia does not support a recommendation of surgical treatment. A malignant cytologic diagnosis has a high positive predictive value for detection of thyroid cancer. (Endocr Pract. 2004;10:330-334)     

Implementation of a joint protocol for the management of thyroid nodules with a cytological diagnosis of follicular lesion of undetermined significance: experience in one hospital

Background: Follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) was introduced for fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in which there is insufficient evidence to classify the lesion as follicular neoplasm/suspicious of follicular neoplasm or suspicious for malignancy. The recommended management was repeat FNA and correlation with clinical and radiological data. In 2009 we started a joint clinicopathological protocol to improve management of FLUS, recommending follow‐up with repeat FNA at 6 months. The aim of this study was to report on the audit of results of this protocol. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of the patients with FLUS at a single hospital. Between 2007 and 2010 we found 135 cases with this diagnosis (3.6%). We only had long enough follow‐up information for the 95 patients that were included in the present study. Results: FLUS was diagnosed in 74 FNAs before protocol implementation (3.2%) and 61 FNAs after (4.2%), with follow‐up of 46 and 49 patients, respectively. Before 2009, 38/46 (82.6%) patients had surgical excisions, compared with 32/49 (65.3%): a significant reduction of 17% in the number requiring surgery (P = 0.05). We have also shown a reduction in the median time to surgery (11.9 versus 2.9 months). Despite the joint protocol, the FNA was only repeated in two patients. The histological diagnoses were similar in the two periods of time: 31.6% and 31.3% follicular adenomas; 13.1% and 3.1% (P = 0.2) papillary carcinoma (follicular variant). Conclusions: Implementation of a joint protocol reduced the number of surgical operations in patients with FLUS but in most cases FNA was not repeated as recommended. Excision was justified in one‐third of operated patients. Less than 15% of lesions were malignant, which is in accordance with previous reports in the literature.     

Impact of Electronic Consultation on Timeliness and Guideline Concordance of Workups Leading to Thyroid Nodule Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

ObjectiveElectronic consultations (e-consults) are commonly used to obtain endocrinology input on clinical questions without a face-to-face visit, but sparse data exist on the resultant quality of care for specific conditions. We examined workups resulting in a thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy to investigate whether endocrinology e-consults were more timely and similarly guideline-concordant compared with endocrinology face-to-face visits and whether endocrinology e-consults were more guideline-concordant compared with workups without endocrinology input.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed charts of 302 thyroid FNA biopsies conducted in the Veterans Affairs health system between May 1, 2017, and February 4, 2020 (e-consult, n = 99; face-to-face visit, n = 100; no endocrinology input, n = 103). We used t tests to compare timeliness, χ² tests to compare the proportion of guideline-concordant workups, and multivariable linear and logistic models to control for demographic factors.ResultsFNAs preceded by an endocrinology e-consult had more timely workups compared with those preceded by endocrinology face-to-face visits in terms of days elapsed between referral and FNA biopsy (geometric mean 44.7 days vs 61.7 days, P = .01). The difference in the summary measure of guideline concordance across groups was not statistically significant (P =.38).ConclusionE-consults were faster than face-to-face consults and similarly guideline-concordant compared with both face-to-face consults and no endocrinology input for workups resulting in FNA. Decisions about the appropriate use of e-consults for thyroid nodules should take into account these data while also considering the potential benefits of direct patient-endocrinologist interaction for complex situations.     

Do all Thyroid Nodules >4 cm need to be Removed? An Evaluation of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Large Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Controversy exists regarding the ability of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy to rule out malignancy when thyroid nodules exceed 4 cm in diameter. The goal of this study was to provide data regarding FNA accuracy in a clinical setting for detecting/ruling out malignancy in large thyroid nodules (≥4 cm) and discuss FNA utility in guiding surgical decisions.Methods: All thyroid FNA cases performed at Marshfield Clinic from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2010 followed by complete or partial thyroidectomy on nodules of at least 4 cm were identified. Demographics, medical history, nodule biopsy characteristics, surgical procedures, and diagnosis data were abstracted. FNA was compared to histologic evaluation of surgical specimens.Results: A total of 198 patients with large thyroid nodules were identified. Most had a single large nodule, but ~40% were multinodular, and 206 total nodules were assessed. Females outnumbered males, and the mean age was ~50 years. After surgery, cancer was histologically identified in 49/206 (23.8%) nodules, including 9/123 nodules that had been categorized as benign by FNA, corresponding to a false-negative rate of 7.3%. Sensitivity/specificity for detecting malignancy by FNA was ~80%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was just below 60%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 93% but rose to 96% when papillary microcarcinomas were excluded.Conclusion: While FNA sensitivity in large nodules was relatively low, NPV was high, especially if incidental papillary microcarcinomas were excluded. When cancer prevalence and NPV are known, FNA can be a reliable “rule out” test in nodules ≥4 cm. This information is critical and can help guide the surgery decision, especially in high-risk patients. The decision for surgery should not be solely based on nodule size but should consider additional factors including cancer prevalence, clinical history, ultrasound features, surgical risk, and life expectancy.Abbreviations:FNA = fine-needle aspirationNPV = negative predictive valuePPV = positive predictive value     

Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007

S. Piana, A. Frasoldati, M. Ferrari, R. Valcavi, E. Froio, V. Barbieri, C. Pedroni and G. Gardini Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007 Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) has long been recognized as an essential technique for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Although specific cytological patterns have been recognized, a wide variety of reporting schemes for thyroid FNA results have been adopted. This study reports our experience with a five‐category reporting scheme developed in‐house based on a numeric score and applied to a large series of consecutive thyroid FNAs. It focuses mainly on the accuracy of thyroid FNA as a preoperative test in a large subset of histologically distinct thyroid lesions. Methods: During the 1998–2007 period, 18 359 thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNAs were performed on 15 269 patients; FNA reports were classified according to a C1–C5 reporting scheme: non‐diagnostic (C1), benign (C2), indeterminate (C3), suspicious (C4), and malignant (C5). Results: Non‐diagnostic (C1) and indeterminate (C3) FNA results totalled 2 230 (12.1%) and 1 461 (7.9%), respectively, while suspicious (C4) and malignant (C5) results totalled 238 (1.3%) and 531 (2.9%), respectively. Histological results were available in 2 047 patients, with thyroid malignancy detected in 840. Positive predictive value of FNA was 98.1% with a 49.0 likelihood ratio (LR) of malignancy in patients with a C4/C5 FNA report. Conclusions: This five‐category scheme for thyroid FNA is accurate in discriminating between the virtual certainty of malignancy associated with C5, a high rate (92%) of malignancy associated with C4, and a 98% probability of a histological benign diagnosis associated with C2. Further sub‐classifications of C3 may improve the accuracy of the diagnostic scheme and may help in recognizing patients eligible for a ‘wait and see’ management.