The use of elements of the E. coli Ntr-system for the design of an optimized recombinant expression system for high cell density cultivations.

The inducible glnA promoter 2 of the E. coli glutamine synthetase gene is suitable as an expression unit for the production of recombinant proteins at low and high cell densities. It is active when the concentration of ammonium as the sole nitrogen source in the culture medium is below 1 mM. This nitrogen regulatory system was optimized by introduction of expression cassettes consisting of additional elements of the ntr-system. These artificial constructions result in enhanced recombinant gene expression in the production phase. Furthermore, the basic recombinant protein level during the growth phase is reduced due to a tighter promoter control. A three- to four-fold higher accumulation of chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase (as reporter protein) and of anti-EGF-receptor miniantibodies was achieved by increasing the amount of the final regulator molecule NtrC approximately P via plasmidal co-expression of the ntrC gene. The introduction of a modified glnA promoter 1 inverse to glnAp2 lowered the basic activity of glnAp2 to about one half. It is assumed that under nitrogen excess conditions sigma 70-RNA polymerase binds at glnAp1 and thereby prevents most of the binding of sigma 54-RNA polymerase at glnAp2. The optimized expression systems were successfully applied in low and high cell density cultivations. In the fed-batch phase of high cell density cultivations recombinant protein formation was induced through external nitrogen limitation under FIA-controlled concentration of glucose as carbon source.     

Protein-induced DNA bending clarifies the architectural organization of the sigma54-dependent glnAp2 promoter

Sigma54-RNA polymerase (Esigma54) predominantly contacts one face of the DNA helix in the closed promoter complex, and interacts with the upstream enhancer-bound activator via DNA looping. Up to date, the precise face of Esigma54 that contacts the activator to convert the closed complex to an open one remains unclear. By introducing protein-induced DNA bends at precise locations between upstream enhancer sequences and the core promoter of the sigma54-dependent glnAp2 promoter without changing the distance in-between, we observed a strong enhanced or decreased promoter activity, especially on linear DNA templates in vitro. The relative positioning and orientations of Esigma54, DNA bending protein and enhancer-bound activator on linear DNA were determined by in vitro footprinting analysis. Intriguingly, the locations from which the DNA bending protein exerted its optimal stimulatory effects were all found on the opposite face of the DNA helix compared with the DNA bound Esigma54 in the closed complex. Therefore, these results provide evidence that the activator must approach the Esigma54 closed complexes from the unbound face of the promoter DNA helix to catalyse open complex formation. This proposal is further supported by the modelling of activator-promoter DNA-Esigma54 complex.     

Role of the spacer between the -35 and -10 regions in sigmas promoter selectivity in Escherichia coli

In vitro, the sigma(s) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP), RpoS, recognizes nearly identical -35 and -10 promoter consensus sequences as the vegetative sigma70. In vivo, promoter selectivity of RNAP holoenzyme containing either sigma(s) (Esigma(s)) or sigma70 (Esigma70) seems to be achieved by the differential ability of the two holoenzymes to tolerate deviations from the promoter consensus sequence. In this study, we suggest that many natural sigma(s)-dependent promoters possess a -35 element, a feature that has been considered as not conserved among sigma(s)-dependent promoters. These -35 hexamers are mostly non-optimally spaced from the -10 region, but nevertheless functional. A +/- 2 bp deviation from the optimal spacer length of 17 bp or the complete absence of a -35 consensus sequence decreases overall promoter activity, but at the same time favours Esigma(s) in its competition with Esigma70 for promoter recognition. On the other hand, the reduction of promoter activity due to shifting of the -35 element can be counterbalanced by an activity-stimulating feature such as A/T-richness of the spacer region without compromising Esigma(s) selectivity. Based on mutational analysis of sigma(s), we suggest a role of regions 2.5 and 4 of sigma(s) in sensing sub-optimally located -35 elements.     

Binding affinity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase*sigma54 holoenzyme for the glnAp2, nifH and nifL promoters

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase associated with the sigma54 factor (RNAP*sigma54) is a holoenzyme form that transcribes a special class of promoters not recognized by the standard RNA polymerase*sigma70 com plex. Promoters for RNAP*sigma54 vary in their overall 'strength' and show differences in their response to the presence of DNA curvature between enhancer and promoter. In order to examine whether these effects are related to the promoter affinity, we have determined the equilibrium dissociation constant K(d) for the binding of RNAP*sigma54 to the three promoters glnAp2, nifH and nifL. Binding studies were conducted by monitoring the changes in fluorescence anisotropy upon titrating RNAP*sigma54 to carboxyrhodamine-labeled DNA duplexes. For the glnAp2 and nifH promoters similar values of K(d) = 0.94 +/- 0.55 nM and K(d) = 0.85 +/- 0.30 nM were determined at physiological ionic strength, while the nifL promoter displayed a significantly weaker affinity with K(d) = 8.5 +/- 1.9 nM. The logarithmic dependence of K(d) on the ionic strength I was -Deltalog(K(d))/Deltalog(I) = 6.1 +/- 0.5 for the glnAp2, 5.2 +/- 1.2 for the nifH and 2.1 +/- 0.1 for the nifL promoter. This suggests that the polymerase can form fewer ion pairs with the nifL promoter, which would account for its weaker binding affinity.